DOCSLIB.ORG

Engagement with False Content Producers Plummeted on Twitter and Facebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Engagement with False Content Producers Plummeted on Twitter and Facebook Engagement with False Content Producers Plummeted on Twitter and Facebook Adrienne Goldstein Manipulative News Sites Accounted for a Record Share of Facebook Interactions Sites that gather and present information irresponsibly (according to the news-rating service NewsGuard) accounted for a record-high one-fifth of Facebook interactions with U.S.-based sitesi in the second quarter of 2021, while engagement with articles from outlets that repeatedly publish false content plummeted on Twitter and Facebook. This occurred amidst an overall decline in engagement with all types of sites. After all-time highs in engagement with both types of deceptive news outlets in 2020, sites that publish false content have seen their engagement drop at much higher rates than U.S.- based sites in general, likely as a result of account takedowns and changes in policies around COVID-19 misinformation and content moderation. The changes demonstrate that Facebook and Twitter have the tools to address disinformation. However, outlets that gather and present information irresponsibly without publishing false content present a special challenge to the platforms. These sites can help spread conspiracies theories about elections and vaccines, highlighting the need for what GMF Digital calls “democratic design” principles to promote transparency and civic information. • Amidst an overall decline in Facebook interactions with U.S.-based sites that began in the latter half of 2020, interactions with outlets that collect and present information irresponsibly dropped in the second quarter of 2021. They fell by slightly less than the drop in overall traffic (35 percent vs 38 percent) and by far less than a sample of 106 trustworthy sites with perfect NewsGuard ratings (56 percent) or sites that repeatedly publish false content (54 percent). Sites that gather and present information irresponsibly can help spread conspiracy theories without publishing false content by cherry-picking anecdotes. • As a result, outlets that gather and present information irresponsibly saw their share of interactions with all U.S.-based sites increase to over one-fifth, a five-year high, while false content producers accounted for only 1 percent of interactions—a five-year low. • On Twitter, verified account shares with sites that repeatedly publish false information fell by 47 percent, outpacing the decline in shares with sites that gather and present information irresponsibly (37 percent), trustworthy sites (38 percent), and all types of web content (31 percent). Sites that gather and present information irresponsibly made up 9 percent of verified account shares of links to U.S.-based sites, and those that repeatedly publish false content made up 3 percent of shares. These are three-year lows for both types of outlet. • The best-performing content on Facebook from outlets that gather and present information irresponsibly focused on race and culture-war issues like critical race theory, but the top- performing articles on each platform raising questions on vaccines also came from these outlets. These outlets dominated outlet traffic on Facebook. Note: For Facebook, GMF’s Digital New Deal project measures interactions (likes, comments, and shares) on posts that include links to deceptive sites—sites that repeatedly publish false content or gather and present information irresponsibly. For Twitter, we analyze shares (tweets and retweets) by verified accounts (that is, blue check-marks) of links to deceptive sites. Facebook interactions and Twitter verified account shares of articles are just a piece of the misinformation puzzle. On Facebook, private groups, memes, and even profile picture frames are also vectors of misinformation. On Twitter, verified accounts represent a small subset of the user base. Interactions and verified account shares do not reflect the number of people who have seen a given piece of content. Facebook Interactions with false and manipulative sites continued to drop in the second quarter of 2021, with sites that publish false content below their 2016 levels and manipulative sites above them. Amidst an overall drop in interactions with U.S.-based sites, interactions with false-content producers and trustworthy sites dropped by over half between the first two quarters of 2021 while interactions with sites that gather and present information irresponsibly dropped by less (slightly more than a third). Interactions with all types of web content, including both kinds of deceptive outlets, increased steadily from the third quarter of 2016 through 2019, before a dramatic uptick 2020. Interactions declined beginning in the third quarter of 2020, with a more intense drop beginning in February 2021. Interactions for outlets that gather and present information irresponsibly grew by 309 percent from the run-up to the 2016 presidential election through the second quarter of 2020, but by second quarter of 2021 they had only increased by 59 percent relative to 2016 levels. Meanwhile, interactions with outlets that repeatedly publish false content declined by 72 percent from 2016 through the second quarter of 2021. Just one year earlier, in the second quarter of 2020, interactions with false content producers had increased by 154 percent relative to 2016 levels. Interactions for all U.S.-based sites and the sample of trustworthy sites were roughly the same in the second quarter of 2021 as in 2016, after having grown considerably in 2020. The top five manipulative sites (Daily Wire, Fox News, The Blaze, Breitbart, and Bongino) accounted for two-thirds of interactions with such sites. There was some movement among these top outlets: The Daily Wire became the top outlet in 2021 after four years of Fox News dominance. The Conservative Opinion dropped out the top five in the second quarter of 2021 as its interactions fell from 61 million to 15 million. According to NewsGuard, outlets that gather and present information irresponsibly fail to “reference multiple sources, preferably those that present direct, firsthand information on a subject or event or from credible second-hand news sources.” These outlets “egregiously distort or misrepresent information to make an argument or report on a subject.” Below are some of the highest-performing articles about vaccines from this group of outlets. • Daily Wire: “NFL Wide Receiver Refuses Vaccine, Wants To 'Represent' Other Silent Players: 'If I'm Forced Into Retirement, So Be It.'” 284,000 interactions. • Fox Business: “Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signs executive order banning 'vaccine passports.’” 207,000 interactions. • Washington Times: “Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene proposes bills to fire Dr. Fauci, ban vaccine passports.” 126,000 interactions. These types of articles speak to the challenges that outlets that gather and present information irresponsibly pose to Facebook. The articles do not include falsehoods about vaccines. But they disproportionately amplify vaccine-hesitant voices over experts and safety data and fail to mention risks of not being vaccinated against COVID-19. This is where what GMF Digital calls “democratic design” would help by increasing transparency on coordination, amplification, and outlet funding and practices, while amplifying civic information providers such as public-health officials. Various new Facebook policies that address upstream design may have restricted interactions with false content producer content. • Facebook began reducing the distribution of posts in News Feed from an individual’s Facebook account if they repeatedly share false content. Our data do not include interactions on posts from private profiles, but individuals can boost public pages by sharing their content. • Facebook began displaying a pop-up when users attempt to like a page that has repeatedly published false content. • In June, Facebook stopped automatically applying the “newsworthiness” fact-checking exception to politicians. • In May, Facebook banned the page for LifeSiteNews, an anti-abortion false content producer, over COVID-19 and vaccine misinformation policies. LifeSiteNews.com was one of the top false content producers in 2019 and 2020. Not all Facebook policy changes have a significant observable impact on outlet interactions. For example, interactions with the sample of trustworthy sites did not increase dramatically when Facebook emphasized the quality of journalism in its news feed algorithm in immediate aftermath of the 2020 presidential election. However, the changes may have increased views of content from trustworthy outlets or prevented a significant decline in engagement with trustworthy sites. Twitter Verified account shares of links to false content producers fell by 47 percent between the first and second quarters of 2021, significantly more than shares of links to all U.S. sites (35 percent), outlets that gather and present information irresponsibly (37 percent), and trustworthy outlets (38 percent). These declines in shares for outlets that produce false or misleading content come after historic highs in the fourth quarter of 2020. Compared to 2018, when our data set begins, verified account shares of links to deceptive sites declined even more than shares with all types of U.S.-based sites, with false content producers experiencing the greatest decline. The drop-off was even more pronounced compared to the fourth quarter of 2020, when shares with false and misleading outlets reached their peak. Relative to the first quarter of 2018, verified account shares dropped by 50 percent for outlets that repeatedly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How the U.S. Christian Right Is Transforming Sexual Politics in Africa
    Colonizing African Values How the U.S. Christian Right is Transforming Sexual Politics in Africa A PUBLICATION OF POLITICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES BY KAPYA JOHN KAOMA Political Research Associates (PRA) is a progressive think tank devoted to supporting movements that build a more just and inclusive democratic society. We expose movements, institutions, and ideologies that undermine human rights. PRA seeks to advance progressive thinking and action by providing research-based information, analysis, and referrals. Copyright ©2012 Political Research Associates Kaoma, Kapya John. ISBN-10: 0-915987-26-0 ISBN-13: 978-0-915987-26-9 Design by: Mindflash Advertising Photographs by: Religion Dispatches, Michele Siblioni/AFP/Getty Images, Mark Taylor/markn3tel/Flickr This research was made possible by the generous support of the Arcus Foundation and the Wallace Global Fund. Political Research Associates 1310 Broadway, Suite 201 Somerville, MA 02144-1837 www.publiceye.org Colonizing African Values How the U.S. Christian Right is Transforming Sexual Politics in Africa A PUBLICATION OF POLITICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES BY KAPYA KAOMA POLITICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES i Colonizing African Values - How the U.S. Christian Right is Transforming Sexual Politics in Africa Foreword ganda’s infamous 2009 Anti-Homosexuality Bill, onstrates in Colonizing African Values that the Ameri- which would institute the death penalty for a can culture wars in Africa are growing hotter. Tracing U new and surreal category of offenses dubbed conflicts over homosexuality and women’s repro- “aggravated homosexuality,” captured international ductive autonomy back to their sources, Kaoma has headlines for months. The human rights community uncovered the expanding influence of an interde- and the Obama administration responded forcefully, nominational cast of conservative American inter- the bill was tabled, and the story largely receded ests.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Gab? a Bastion of Free Speech Or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber?
    What is Gab? A Bastion of Free Speech or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber? Savvas Zannettou Barry Bradlyn Emiliano De Cristofaro Cyprus University of Technology Princeton Center for Theoretical Science University College London [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Haewoon Kwak Michael Sirivianos Gianluca Stringhini Qatar Computing Research Institute Cyprus University of Technology University College London & Hamad Bin Khalifa University [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Jeremy Blackburn University of Alabama at Birmingham [email protected] ABSTRACT ACM Reference Format: Over the past few years, a number of new “fringe” communities, Savvas Zannettou, Barry Bradlyn, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Haewoon Kwak, like 4chan or certain subreddits, have gained traction on the Web Michael Sirivianos, Gianluca Stringhini, and Jeremy Blackburn. 2018. What is Gab? A Bastion of Free Speech or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber?. In WWW at a rapid pace. However, more often than not, little is known about ’18 Companion: The 2018 Web Conference Companion, April 23–27, 2018, Lyon, how they evolve or what kind of activities they attract, despite France. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558. recent research has shown that they influence how false informa- 3191531 tion reaches mainstream communities. This motivates the need to monitor these communities and analyze their impact on the Web’s information ecosystem. 1 INTRODUCTION In August 2016, a new social network called Gab was created The Web’s information ecosystem is composed of multiple com- as an alternative to Twitter.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 19-1392 In The Supreme Court of the United States THOMAS E. DOBBS, M.D., M.P.H., STATE HEALTH OFFICER OF THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, ET AL., Petitioners, v. JACKSON WOMEN’S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, ET AL., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit AMICUS BRIEF OF THE ELLIOT INSTITUTE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS THOMAS P. MONAGHAN JAY ALAN SEKULOW CECILIA NOLAND-HEIL Counsel of Record FRANCIS J. MANION STUART J. ROTH GEOFFREY R. SURTEES COLBY M. MAY AMERICAN CENTER FOR WALTER M. WEBER LAW & JUSTICE LAURA HERNANDEZ 1000 Regent University AMERICAN CENTER FOR Drive LAW & JUSTICE Virginia Beach, VA 23464 201 Maryland Ave., N.E. (757) 226-2489 Washington, DC 20002 (202) 546-8890 [email protected] Counsel for Amicus ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page QUESTION PRESENTED..................... i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES....................iv INTEREST OF AMICUS...................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT................... 1 ARGUMENT................................ 2 I. ABORTION IS A POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS PROCEDURE................3 A. Ambulance calls........................ 3 B. Maternal abortion deaths................ 5 II. THE CLAIM THAT ABORTION IS SAFER THAN CHILDBIRTH IS NOT SUPPORTED AND MOST LIKELY FALSE ............... 7 A. Relevance to abortion jurisprudence........ 7 B. Repetition of the fiction.................. 8 C. Refutation of the fiction and possible backpedaling.......................... 10 D. Dissecting the fiction................... 12 E. Response to contrary statements in Whole Woman's Health ....................... 19 III. PUBLISHED LITERATURE INDICATES THAT ABORTION IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN CONTINUED PREGNANCY......... 21 iii CONCLUSION..............................26 APPENDIX A: Correspondence with HHS/CDC . 1a APPENDIX B: Documented ambulance calls 2009-21 ............................... 10a iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page CASES City of Akron v.
    [Show full text]
  • The Performance of Biopower and Liveliness: the Life and Death of Terri Schiavo
    Platform, Vol. 7, No. 1, On Corporeality, Spring 2013 The Performance of Biopower and Liveliness: The Life and Death of Terri Schiavo By Renée Newman-Storen Abstract Between 1990 and 2005, American woman Terri Schiavo was in a Persistent Vegetative State (PVS), kept alive by a surgically inserted feeding tube. A perceived liveliness, or lack thereof, was used as evidence on divergent ideologies and value systems and, in addition to the existing social and political landscape of the US at the time, assisted in igniting a ferocious debate on the value of life. The tragic case of a woman caught between life and death, existing in neither state entirely, was supplanted by a performative spectacle, the activated spectator and the ensuing moral panic over the nature of what being ‘alive’ itself might mean. In this article I utilise Foucault’s understanding of biopower; the concept that life, populations and the body are regulated according to systems of power and that biopower is a dominant discursive function of modernity. I examine the specifics of the tragedy of the Schiavo case in relation to the prevailing ideological (religious and political) conditions in the US that formed the conditions for the regulatory operations of the biopolitical/biopower, concluding that the battle for life at any cost becomes greater than the object or the subject of this debate and that this fight is ultimately an ideological interplay and a struggle for power. In 1990, American woman Terri Schiavo suffered a cardio and respiratory attack and until her death in 2005 was in a Persistent Vegetative State (PVS), kept alive by a surgically inserted feeding tube.
    [Show full text]
  • FAKE NEWS!”: President Trump’S Campaign Against the Media on @Realdonaldtrump and Reactions to It on Twitter
    “FAKE NEWS!”: President Trump’s Campaign Against the Media on @realdonaldtrump and Reactions To It on Twitter A PEORIA Project White Paper Michael Cornfield GWU Graduate School of Political Management [email protected] April 10, 2019 This report was made possible by a generous grant from William Madway. SUMMARY: This white paper examines President Trump’s campaign to fan distrust of the news media (Fox News excepted) through his tweeting of the phrase “Fake News (Media).” The report identifies and illustrates eight delegitimation techniques found in the twenty-five most retweeted Trump tweets containing that phrase between January 1, 2017 and August 31, 2018. The report also looks at direct responses and public reactions to those tweets, as found respectively on the comment thread at @realdonaldtrump and in random samples (N = 2500) of US computer-based tweets containing the term on the days in that time period of his most retweeted “Fake News” tweets. Along with the high percentage of retweets built into this search, the sample exhibits techniques and patterns of response which are identified and illustrated. The main findings: ● The term “fake news” emerged in public usage in October 2016 to describe hoaxes, rumors, and false alarms, primarily in connection with the Trump-Clinton presidential contest and its electoral result. ● President-elect Trump adopted the term, intensified it into “Fake News,” and directed it at “Fake News Media” starting in December 2016-January 2017. 1 ● Subsequently, the term has been used on Twitter largely in relation to Trump tweets that deploy it. In other words, “Fake News” rarely appears on Twitter referring to something other than what Trump is tweeting about.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Faris, Robert M., Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33759251 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA AUGUST 2017 PARTISANSHIP, Robert Faris Hal Roberts PROPAGANDA, & Bruce Etling Nikki Bourassa DISINFORMATION Ethan Zuckerman Yochai Benkler Online Media & the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper is the result of months of effort and has only come to be as a result of the generous input of many people from the Berkman Klein Center and beyond. Jonas Kaiser and Paola Villarreal expanded our thinking around methods and interpretation. Brendan Roach provided excellent research assistance. Rebekah Heacock Jones helped get this research off the ground, and Justin Clark helped bring it home. We are grateful to Gretchen Weber, David Talbot, and Daniel Dennis Jones for their assistance in the production and publication of this study. This paper has also benefited from contributions of many outside the Berkman Klein community. The entire Media Cloud team at the Center for Civic Media at MIT’s Media Lab has been essential to this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Virality Project Weekly Briefing #18 April 20, 2021 - April 27, 2021
    Virality Project Weekly Briefing #18 April 20, 2021 - April 27, 2021 This report was created by analysts from the Virality Project, a coalition of research entities focused on real-time detection, analysis, and response to COVID-19 anti-vaccine mis- and disinformation. The Virality Project aims to support information exchange between public health officials, government, and social media platforms through weekly briefings and real-time incident response. Public officials and health organizations interested in officially joining this collaboration can reach the partnership at [email protected]. In this briefing: Events This Week ● Vaccine “shedding” narrative about menstrual cycles creates confusion about COVID-19 vaccines’ impact on women’s health among anti-vaccine and wellness communities. ● Israeli study with small sample size finds correlation between Pfizer vaccine and shingles. Online users twist the findings to suggest a link between vaccines and herpes. ● CDC reports 5,800 “breakthrough” cases of people getting coronavirus after vaccination. Some accounts have seized on this data to suggest that vaccines are ineffective. ● An unfounded claim that a 12-year-old was hospitalized due to a vaccine trial spread among anti-vaccine groups resulting in safety concerns about vaccinating children. ● Anti-vaccine accounts attempt to hijack #RollUpYourSleeves after NBC TV Special to draw attention to vaccine misinformation. Non-English Language ● Chinese language video from Guo Wengui spreads false narrative and Foreign Spotlight that no COVID-19 vaccines work. ● Children’s Health Defense article translated into Chinese spreads on WeChat. ● Report from Israeli People’s Committee uses unverified reports to claim Pfizer vaccine more dangerous than others Ongoing Themes and ● New film featuring footage from the “Worldwide Rally for Tactics Freedom” marketed widely online among anti-vaccine and health freedom groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Proceedings of the Thirteenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2019) Different Spirals of Sameness: A Study of Content Sharing in Mainstream and Alternative Media Benjamin D. Horne,* Jeppe Nørregaard,y Sibel Adalı* Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute*, Technical University of Denmarky [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Vos, and Shoemaker 2009; Allcott and Gentzkow 2017; Mele et al. 2017). Thus, we may have a more diverse set of In this paper, we analyze content sharing between news news to read than in years past, but the standards of quality sources in the alternative and mainstream media using a dataset of 713K articles and 194 sources. We find that content have wavered, creating a new set of concerns. sharing happens in tightly formed communities, and these This rise in low-quality and potentially malicious news communities represent relatively homogeneous portions of producers has been the focus of many recent studies such the media landscape. Through a mix-method analysis, we as those focusing on detecting false content (Potthast et al. find several primary content sharing behaviors. First, we find 2017; Popat et al. 2016; Singhania, Fernandez, and Rao that the vast majority of shared articles are only shared with 2017; Horne et al. 2018; Baly et al. 2018). Some other stud- similar news sources (i.e. same community). Second, we find ies have focused on the tactics used to spread low-quality that despite these echo-chambers of sharing, specific sources, news, such as the use of social bots (Shao et al. 2017) such as The Drudge Report, mix content from both main- stream and conspiracy communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Election Fraud in the 2020 US Election
    2020 Analysis of Election Fraud in the 2020 US Election Insights from pressrelations GmbH Analysis period: 08/01/2016 –11/14/2020 2020 REPORTING OVER TIME The Subject of Election Fraud in US Media In 2016, Trump prepares the ground for his current accusations of election fraud by fraud - especially in the last few days. Starting on Election Day, reporting on the topic speaking of "illegal" votes for the first time. This narrative will be carried over one-to- was initially quite hesitant. The topic was mainly picked up by untrustworthy media one to the mail-in ballots in 2020. The narrative that Democrats wanted to "steal" the outlets. Reliable outlets picked up the topic after November 12th, right after Trump's election comes as a consequence of their call for absentee voting due to the tweet about the "deleted votes". coronavirus pandemic. The various allegations related to the technology for voting and counting votes used by Dominion Voting Systems make up a large part of the discussion about election Coverage on the topic of election fraud by number of contributions: August 2016 - November 2020 6.000 US Election 2020: Trump claims the election was stolen by fraud 5.000 Midterms 2018: Trump 4.000 accuses Democratic Party of US Elections 2016: manipulation of ballots by Trump: "Election could be millions of illegal third parties postponed to prevent mail-in 3.000 immigrants vote, election fraud". according to Donald Trump: "Hillary Clinton won 2.000 Trump 'popular vote' thanks to 3-5 million illegal votes" 1.000 0 Apr Apr Apr Apr Jan
    [Show full text]
  • Disinformation, and Influence Campaigns on Twitter 'Fake News'
    Disinformation, ‘Fake News’ and Influence Campaigns on Twitter OCTOBER 2018 Matthew Hindman Vlad Barash George Washington University Graphika Contents Executive Summary . 3 Introduction . 7 A Problem Both Old and New . 9 Defining Fake News Outlets . 13 Bots, Trolls and ‘Cyborgs’ on Twitter . 16 Map Methodology . 19 Election Data and Maps . 22 Election Core Map Election Periphery Map Postelection Map Fake Accounts From Russia’s Most Prominent Troll Farm . 33 Disinformation Campaigns on Twitter: Chronotopes . 34 #NoDAPL #WikiLeaks #SpiritCooking #SyriaHoax #SethRich Conclusion . 43 Bibliography . 45 Notes . 55 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study is one of the largest analyses to date on how fake news spread on Twitter both during and after the 2016 election campaign. Using tools and mapping methods from Graphika, a social media intelligence firm, we study more than 10 million tweets from 700,000 Twitter accounts that linked to more than 600 fake and conspiracy news outlets. Crucially, we study fake and con- spiracy news both before and after the election, allowing us to measure how the fake news ecosystem has evolved since November 2016. Much fake news and disinformation is still being spread on Twitter. Consistent with other research, we find more than 6.6 million tweets linking to fake and conspiracy news publishers in the month before the 2016 election. Yet disinformation continues to be a substantial problem postelection, with 4.0 million tweets linking to fake and conspiracy news publishers found in a 30-day period from mid-March to mid-April 2017. Contrary to claims that fake news is a game of “whack-a-mole,” more than 80 percent of the disinformation accounts in our election maps are still active as this report goes to press.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2020 Election 2 Contents
    Covering the Coverage The 2020 Election 2 Contents 4 Foreword 29 Us versus him Kyle Pope Betsy Morais and Alexandria Neason 5 Why did Matt Drudge turn on August 10, 2020 Donald Trump? Bob Norman 37 The campaign begins (again) January 29, 2020 Kyle Pope August 12, 2020 8 One America News was desperate for Trump’s approval. 39 When the pundits paused Here’s how it got it. Simon van Zuylen–Wood Andrew McCormick Summer 2020 May 27, 2020 47 Tuned out 13 The story has gotten away from Adam Piore us Summer 2020 Betsy Morais and Alexandria Neason 57 ‘This is a moment for June 3, 2020 imagination’ Mychal Denzel Smith, Josie Duffy 22 For Facebook, a boycott and a Rice, and Alex Vitale long, drawn-out reckoning Summer 2020 Emily Bell July 9, 2020 61 How to deal with friends who have become obsessed with 24 As election looms, a network conspiracy theories of mysterious ‘pink slime’ local Mathew Ingram news outlets nearly triples in size August 25, 2020 Priyanjana Bengani August 4, 2020 64 The only question in news is ‘Will it rate?’ Ariana Pekary September 2, 2020 3 66 Last night was the logical end 92 The Doociness of America point of debates in America Mark Oppenheimer Jon Allsop October 29, 2020 September 30, 2020 98 How careful local reporting 68 How the media has abetted the undermined Trump’s claims of Republican assault on mail-in voter fraud voting Ian W. Karbal Yochai Benkler November 3, 2020 October 2, 2020 101 Retire the election needles 75 Catching on to Q Gabriel Snyder Sam Thielman November 4, 2020 October 9, 2020 102 What the polls show, and the 78 We won’t know what will happen press missed, again on November 3 until November 3 Kyle Pope Kyle Paoletta November 4, 2020 October 15, 2020 104 How conservative media 80 E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scandalous Fall of Feminism and the ``First Black President''
    Chapter 24 The Scandalous Fall of Feminism and the ``First Black President'' Melissa Deem Feminism is always on trial. The most recent indictments occurred during the popular coverage of the Clinton/Lewinsky affair. Ironically, this time feminism was called forth to defend itself against the charge of silence. One commentator argued that this latest indictment ``signifies the end of feminism as we know it.'' He continues, ``the once shrill voice of feminist outrage is suddenly, deafeningly still'' (Horowitz 1998). These comments represent a new trend within the popular discourses concerning feminism in the United States. This may be the first moment in history when feminists have been castigated for too little speech. The ``fall'' of Bill Clinton (which never came to completion but saturated the political public sphere for two long years) was accompanied by another antici- pated fall: the demise of feminism. Public discourse across the political spectrum heralded the ``death of feminism'' when commenting on the relative silence of feminists in regard to the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal. Feminism's ``silence'' has been found especially noteworthy when contrasted to the loud anti-Republican pedagogy concerning sex and power with which feminists trumped patriarchy during the earlier Clarence Thomas and Bob Packwood scandals. Feminism may be the most visibly culpable post-1960s political movement called into question by the discourses of the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal, but it is certainly not alone. Clinton has come to embody a set of complaints against feminism and post-1960s racial and class politics more generally. His embodi- ment of minoritarian politics has been striking.
    [Show full text]