Chapter 27: Margaret Street

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 27: Margaret Street DRAFT CHAPTER 27 Margaret Street In 1742 the Daily Advertiser ran a notice inviting offers for a collection of shells ‘fit either for the Cabinet, Grotto, Frame, or Flower Work’ to be viewed at a house near Oxford Market at the east end of Margaret Street, ‘a Pedestal in Shell-Work over the door’.1 That may be the first public reference to Margaret Street. By then this street of four blocks, running east out of the south corner of Cavendish Square up to the edge of the Cavendish–Harley estate at Wells Street, was well on its way to completion. It had acquired its name by the time the original estate layout was published by John Prince back in 1719 (see Ill. ##/##). It commemorated the 2nd Earl of Oxford’s four-year-old daughter Lady Margaret Harley, whose marriage to the 2nd Duke of Portland at the Oxford Chapel fifteen years later brought the property into the Cavendish- Bentinck family. Had Prince’s plan been followed, Margaret Street would have been shorter, terminating after just two blocks in a large square, ‘Marybone Place’, intended for a market on the axis of Great Portland Street. But the revised plan of the early 1720s, made or influenced by James Gibbs, reduced the size of what became Oxford Market, leaving Margaret Street free to run on eastwards to the estate border. Development at either end of the street started in the 1720s, more firmly at the western end, beyond Bolsover and Edward Streets. It continued apace throughout the 1730s, so that by the time of the Daily Advertiser notice, head leases had been granted for the whole north side except for the future sites of All Saints Church and Audley House (Nos 9–12). Opposite, progress Survey of London © Bartlett School of Architecture, University College London Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/architecture/research/survey-london 1 DRAFT east of Great Portland Street was less even, faltering after 1737. After two head leases were granted in 1743 (of Nos 69–71), the rest followed intermittently in the 1750s apart from No. 84 (the All Saints school site), leased as late as 1769.2 The south side of Margaret Street in the vicinity of the pre-existing Marylebone Passage consequently became a ragbag of semi- industrial premises and yards. Few of the takes offered in this leasing process amounted to more than three or four house-plots. Many of the original head lessees were familiar from elsewhere on the Cavendish–Harley estate, like John Devall (Nos 18, 21- 22 and 62–64), George Mercer (Nos 13–17 and 46), William Wilton (Nos 19 and 20) and the ubiquitous Thomas Huddle (Nos 8–12 and 72–74). The biggest single taker was the joiner John Lane, who developed the sites of Nos 23–28 and 51–54 opposite in 1735–6. His ground included the street’s most enduring pub, The Cock at the north-west corner with Great Portland Street, leased in 1735.3 The lack of remaining buildings predating the second half of the nineteenth century means that little can be said about Margaret Street’s early appearance, but it was probably humdrum. The one exception to the ordinary run of houses was the Margaret Street Chapel, built around 1752 between Nos 8 and 9 as a dissenters’ chapel and little above humdrum itself. The nineteenth-century saw this chapel and its surroundings transformed into London’s leading Anglo-Catholic church. Margaret Street was a mixed street. In its early years it attracted a few gentry, particularly along the north side west of Great Titchfield Street. One house here, John Devall’s No. 18, was exceptionally wide, with an ample garden behind, and therefore appealed to grandees such as the 6th Earl of Denbigh in the 1760s, and the Earl of Euston (future 4th Duke of Grafton) in the 1790s and early 1800s.4 Further west, Nos 27–29 were also highly rated houses built by John Lane in the late 1730s. The staircase compartment of No. 28 was recorded by the Belcher & Joass assistant C. D. Carus-Wilson before the house was destroyed in 1908, and published in Mervyn Macartney’s Survey of London © Bartlett School of Architecture, University College London Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/architecture/research/survey-london 2 DRAFT Practical Exemplar of Architecture. It had an oak stair with triple balusters on each step and ornamental plasterwork on the walls and ceiling. The oakwork was partly reused in Macartney’s country home, Kennet Orley, Woolhampton, Berkshire, but the plasterwork was ‘entirely ruined in removal’. The next-door house, No. 29, was leased by Lane in 1738 to Lady Elizabeth Montagu.5 Early Margaret Street residents of note included the writer William Duncombe, who died at a house here in 1769; the architect John Soane, a lodger at No. 53 in 1781–3 and tenant of No. 50, 1783–6; Thomas Jervais, the pre-eminent stained-glass painter of his day, at No. 69, c.1773–83, before he moved to Windsor to work on St George’s Chapel; and the military engineer General Hugh Debbieg, at No. 53 from the late 1790s till his death in 1810. Artists included George Carter, painter, at No. 31, c.1777–85; George Townly Stubbs, engraver, at No. 48, 1777; and Robert Fulton, portraitist and later inventor of the steamboat, at No. 67, 1791.6 The quotient of tradespeople was strong by the end of the eighteenth century, some doubtless already drawn by the magnet of Oxford Street’s shops. Insurance records of the 1790–1840 period show dressmakers, staymakers, milliners and hairdressers in several Margaret Street houses. Other well-represented trades were coach-building and coach-painting.7 For a while the scruffy east end of the south side hosted some notable manufacturers. Jervais may have been the first, at No. 69. An estate survey of about 1805 shows a large open yard surrounded by ‘Chiesley’s Agricultural Implement Manufactory’ (Robert Chislie & Co., according to the ratebooks); then, just further east, Henry Maudslay, ‘mechanist’, cheek by jowl with Schweppe & Company’s mineral water warehouse on the later convent site (Ill. 27/1). Maudslay moved into Margaret Street from his first independent premises round the corner at 64 Wells Street in 1802, remaining till 1810. In these years this pioneer of the British machine-tool industry was employing up to 80 men and making his celebrated block-making machinery for Survey of London © Bartlett School of Architecture, University College London Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/architecture/research/survey-london 3 DRAFT Portsmouth Dockyard in forges behind the frontage.8 For the Schweppes company this was their fourth London address. Jacob (sometimes called James) Schweppe from Geneva had originally opened a London branch for his carbonated water in 1792 at Drury Lane, then after one brief move took on 11 Margaret Street in 1795. The shift to larger premises across the road seems to have coincided with Schweppe’s retirement in 1798–9 in favour of three Channel Islanders, H. W. & F. C. Lauzun and R. C. Brohier, who continued the business here under Schweppe’s name until 1831, when it moved to 51 Berners Street. Changes in numbering at this haphazard end of the street make the addresses of these premises confusing. Maudslay is shown on the estate map as at No. 75, but that had altered to 78 before he left. Schweppes are advertised in 1804 as at No. 75, yet the estate map puts them at No. 76 and by 1818 they are at No. 79, a number which appears on surviving Schweppes bottles. The ratebooks give different numberings again but no change of premises seems to have been involved. Later, between 1838 and 1870, a back building occupied by the Irish sculptor Patrick MacDowell as his studio is variously numbered as 74A, 75 and 78.9 The planning and building of Regent Street between 1813 and 1823 broke the unity of Margaret Street and its relation to Cavendish Square, leaving a rump of houses at the west end beyond the new street, all on the south side (Nos 34–40). Several houses were demolished during the process, including No. 42, from about 1797 the home of the painters Charles Hayter and his son George.10 The street was left with gaps in the numbering as a result. Property on the north side of Margaret Street east of Great Titchfield Street was damaged by a severe fire in 1825, which caused havoc in the middle of the block as far east as Wells Street. In 1844–5 the builder John Kelk, successor to William Newton, carpenter, who had premises at No. 12 on the north-east corner with Great Titchfield Street and yards behind, moved his base to South Street, Grosvenor Square, and redeveloped the Margaret Street Survey of London © Bartlett School of Architecture, University College London Website: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/architecture/research/survey-london 4 DRAFT frontage, tucking in three extra houses west of Nos 9–11.11 It was also Kelk, soon to gain fame as a public works contractor, who secured the contract for the more dramatic change a few doors eastwards, the replacement of the Margaret Chapel and its neighbours with All Saints in 1850–2. By a short head the church was preceded by a synagogue further west, tucked away in 1848–9 on back land between Nos 48 and 50 on the south side, between Regent and Great Portland Streets. If more discreet, this project too was not without ambition.
Recommended publications
  • Rhodochrosite Gems Unstable Colouration of Padparadscha-Like
    Volume 36 / No. 4 / 2018 Effect of Blue Fluorescence on the Colour Appearance of Diamonds Rhodochrosite Gems The Hope Diamond Unstable Colouration of in London Padparadscha-like Sapphires Volume 36 / No. 4 / 2018 Cover photo: Rhodochrosite is prized as both mineral specimens and faceted stones, which are represented here by ‘The Snail’ (5.5 × 8.6 cm, COLUMNS from N’Chwaning, South Africa) and a 40.14 ct square-cut gemstone from the Sweet Home mine, Colorado, USA. For more on rhodochrosite, see What’s New 275 the article on pp. 332–345 of this issue. Specimens courtesy of Bill Larson J-Smart | SciAps Handheld (Pala International/The Collector, Fallbrook, California, USA); photo by LIBS Unit | SYNTHdetect XL | Ben DeCamp. Bursztynisko, The Amber Magazine | CIBJO 2018 Special Reports | De Beers Diamond ARTICLES Insight Report 2018 | Diamonds — Source to Use 2018 The Effect of Blue Fluorescence on the Colour 298 Proceedings | Gem Testing Appearance of Round-Brilliant-Cut Diamonds Laboratory (Jaipur, India) By Marleen Bouman, Ans Anthonis, John Chapman, Newsletter | IMA List of Gem Stefan Smans and Katrien De Corte Materials Updated | Journal of Jewellery Research | ‘The Curse Out of the Blue: The Hope Diamond in London 316 of the Hope Diamond’ Podcast | By Jack M. Ogden New Diamond Museum in Antwerp Rhodochrosite Gems: Properties and Provenance 332 278 By J. C. (Hanco) Zwaan, Regina Mertz-Kraus, Nathan D. Renfro, Shane F. McClure and Brendan M. Laurs Unstable Colouration of Padparadscha-like Sapphires 346 By Michael S. Krzemnicki, Alexander Klumb and Judith Braun 323 333 © DIVA, Antwerp Home of Diamonds Gem Notes 280 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Journal of the All India Glass Manufacturers' Federation Inside
    Vol. 4 | No. 1 | April - June 2016 www.aigmf.com Quarterly Journal of The All India Glass Manufacturers’ Federation Bi-lingual Inside Interview Special Feature Yoshihiko Sano • Sustainability in Glass President of Nipro Corporation • A Note on Closed Glass Companies in the USA • Nipro Injects Innovation into Pre- for Artistic Appreciation filled Syringes and Targets US Expansion • Efficient Workflow: Automation and Digitisation Reduce Production and Handling Costs Upcoming Events (Sept 2, 2016) • FEA Studies of Impact Loads on NNPB Refillable • Enhancing Profitability by Empowering Workforce Bottles • Business Opportunities for Indian Glass Companies at Port of Duqm, • Energy Efficient Renovation Boost for Added- Sultanate of Oman Value Glazing • AIGMF Executive Committee Meeting / AGM Main Story Glass Packaging Supporting Swachh Bharat Abhiyaan (Clean India Campaign) event at Central Glass and Ceramic Research Institute (CSIR-CGCRI), Kolkata Page No. 6 Technical Articles Prof. (Dr.) A. K. Bandyopadhyay Prof. (Dr.) A Sustainable 50 for postage postage for 50 ` ASS ASS www.aigmf.com Building and Packaging material - An Publication GlASS Gl Gl 500 (within India) + + India) (within 500 ` ` Overseas: US$ 60 (including postage and bank charges) bank and postage (including 60 US$ Overseas: Order Print Copies: Print Order Price: Price: PORT OF DUQM Duqm, 100% Foreign Ownership the preferred Tax -exemption for 30 years Free Repatriation of Capital Special Economic & profi ts No minimum capital requirement No currency restrictions Zone for your No personal income tax Exemption from import & overseas export duties Usufruct agreements up to 50 years renewable investment One-stop station service For more information, contact: Port of Duqm Company SAOC Tel: (+968) 24342800 | Fax: (+968) 24587343 | [email protected] | www.portduqm.com 2 Kanch | Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXIX - Public and Parliamentary Speeches Part II July 1869 - March 1873 [1869]
    The Online Library of Liberty A Project Of Liberty Fund, Inc. John Stuart Mill, The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXIX - Public and Parliamentary Speeches Part II July 1869 - March 1873 [1869] The Online Library Of Liberty This E-Book (PDF format) is published by Liberty Fund, Inc., a private, non-profit, educational foundation established in 1960 to encourage study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. 2010 was the 50th anniversary year of the founding of Liberty Fund. It is part of the Online Library of Liberty web site http://oll.libertyfund.org, which was established in 2004 in order to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. To find out more about the author or title, to use the site's powerful search engine, to see other titles in other formats (HTML, facsimile PDF), or to make use of the hundreds of essays, educational aids, and study guides, please visit the OLL web site. This title is also part of the Portable Library of Liberty DVD which contains over 1,000 books and quotes about liberty and power, and is available free of charge upon request. The cuneiform inscription that appears in the logo and serves as a design element in all Liberty Fund books and web sites is the earliest-known written appearance of the word “freedom” (amagi), or “liberty.” It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash, in present day Iraq. To find out more about Liberty Fund, Inc., or the Online Library of Liberty Project, please contact the Director at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • 12/05/2005 Case Announcements #2, 2005-Ohio-6408.]
    CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS December 5, 2005 [Cite as 12/05/2005 Case Announcements #2, 2005-Ohio-6408.] MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS On December 2, 2005, the Supreme Court issued orders suspending 13,800 attorneys for noncompliance with Gov.Bar R. VI, which requires attorneys to file a Certificate of Registration and pay applicable fees on or before September 1, 2005. The text of the entry imposing the suspension is reproduced below. This is followed by a list of the attorneys who were suspended. The list includes, by county, each attorney’s Attorney Registration Number. Because an attorney suspended pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VI can be reinstated upon application, an attorney whose name appears below may have been reinstated prior to publication of this notice. Please contact the Attorney Registration Section at 614/387-9320 to determine the current status of an attorney whose name appears below. In re Attorney Registration Suspension : ORDER OF [Attorney Name] : SUSPENSION Respondent. : : [Registration Number] : Gov.Bar R. VI(1)(A) requires all attorneys admitted to the practice of law in Ohio to file a Certificate of Registration for the 2005/2007 attorney registration biennium on or before September 1, 2005. Section 6(A) establishes that an attorney who fails to file the Certificate of Registration on or before September 1, 2005, but pays within ninety days of the deadline, shall be assessed a late fee. Section 6(B) provides that an attorney who fails to file a Certificate of Registration and pay the fees either timely or within the late registration period shall be notified of noncompliance and that if the attorney fails to file evidence of compliance with Gov.Bar R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canterbury Association
    The Canterbury Association (1848-1852): A Study of Its Members’ Connections By the Reverend Michael Blain Note: This is a revised edition prepared during 2019, of material included in the book published in 2000 by the archives committee of the Anglican diocese of Christchurch to mark the 150th anniversary of the Canterbury settlement. In 1850 the first Canterbury Association ships sailed into the new settlement of Lyttelton, New Zealand. From that fulcrum year I have examined the lives of the eighty-four members of the Canterbury Association. Backwards into their origins, and forwards in their subsequent careers. I looked for connections. The story of the Association’s plans and the settlement of colonial Canterbury has been told often enough. (For instance, see A History of Canterbury volume 1, pp135-233, edited James Hight and CR Straubel.) Names and titles of many of these men still feature in the Canterbury landscape as mountains, lakes, and rivers. But who were the people? What brought these eighty-four together between the initial meeting on 27 March 1848 and the close of their operations in September 1852? What were the connections between them? In November 1847 Edward Gibbon Wakefield had convinced an idealistic young Irishman John Robert Godley that in partnership they could put together the best of all emigration plans. Wakefield’s experience, and Godley’s contacts brought together an association to promote a special colony in New Zealand, an English society free of industrial slums and revolutionary spirit, an ideal English society sustained by an ideal church of England. Each member of these eighty-four members has his biographical entry.
    [Show full text]
  • This Essay Explains Benjamin Disraeli Parliamentary Response to The
    Conservatism and British imperialism in India: finding the local roots of empire in Britain and India by Matthew Stubbings A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2015 © Matthew Stubbings 2015 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public ii Abstract This thesis explores the importance of political conservatism in shaping the ideological and political foundations of British imperialism in India between 1857 and 1914. From the Indian Revolt to the rise of Indian nationalism, it examines how British and Indian conservatives attempted to define a conceptual and institutional framework of empire which politically opposed liberal imperialism to the First World War. It relies upon a biographical analysis to examine how intellectual configurations defined distinct political positions on Indian empire. This study reveals the extent that local conservative inclination and action, through political actors such as Lord Ellenborough, Benjamin Disraeli, Lord Mayo, Lord Lytton, the Kathiawar States, Roper Lethbridge, and M.M. Bhownaggree, shaped public and partisan discourse on empire. It argues that British and Indian conservatives evoked shared principles centered in locality, prescription, and imagination to challenge, mollify, and supplant the universal and centralizing ambitions of liberal imperialists and nationalists with the employment of pre-modern ideas and institutions. It is argued that this response to liberalism conditioned their shared contribution and collaboration towards an imperial framework predicated principally upon respecting and supporting local autonomy and traditional authority in a hierarchical and divided India.
    [Show full text]
  • Ed 349 467 Author Title Institution Pub Date Note
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 349 467 CE 062 037 AUTHOR Taylor, Maurice, Ed.; Bedard, Rene, Ed. TITLE Canadian Association for the Study of Adult Education. Proceedings of the Annual Conference (11th, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, May 1992). INSTITUTION Canadian Association for the Study of Adult Education, Guelph (Ontario). PUB DATE May 92 NOTE 384p.; For other proceedings, see ED 299 461, CE 062 029-032, and CE 062 035-036. AVAILABLE FROMSylvie Lefrancois, 132 Victoria Ave., Greenfield Park, Quebec .14V 1L8, Canada ($30 Canadian). PUB TYPE Collected Works Conference Proceedings (021) LANGUAGE English; French EDRS PRICE MF01/PC16 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult Education; Adult Learning; Adult Literacy; Adult Students; Basic Skills; Community Development; Distance Education; Educational Research; Extension Education; Foreign Countries; Labor Education; Learning Theories; Legal Education (Professions); *Literacy Education; Needs Assessment; On the Job Training; Research Methodology; Resource Allocation; Rural Extension; Social Action; Womens Education IDENTIFIERS *Canada; Malta; Tanzania; Workplace Literacy ABSTRACT Among 8 French and 54 English papers in this report are the following: "Marks on Paper" (Andruske); "A Multifaceted Approach to Program Evaluation" (Barabash-Pope et al.); "Marine Incidents and their Prevention through Education" (Boshier); "Exploring Needs of Adult Students in Postsecondary Institutions" (Bradley, Cleveland-Innes); "Emancipation through Acquisition of Basic Skills" (Briton et al.); "RoboEd: Re-Imaging Adult Education
    [Show full text]
  • Thank You to Our 2,900 + Members. Your Support Is the Foundation of Our Nonprofit Hiway Theater
    Thank You to Our 2,900 + Members. Your support is the foundation of our nonprofit Hiway Theater. ANGELS AND MOGULS Mark & Susan Asher Mrs. Edward J. Goodman & Hilary Goodman Sperling Kim Peavy Donald & Marcia Pizer Lee & Sharon Rosenthal David & Suzanne Rowland Jonathan & Joan Wilt PRODUCERS Susan Adler & Bob Chanin James Blair & Eugenia Drobit Evelyn D. Allen-Chase Jay & Jo Blumenthal Wendy Ankrom & Peter Chang Richard & Lowell Booth Barbara & Tom Bale Ken & Marie Boyden Darryl Ball & Connie Kittner Tom & Mary Breslin David Ballard & Lynn Jones Rochelle & Bennett Broad Ellen Bernstein Barrett Kimberly & Donald Brooks John Basile & Joseph Kulkosky Wendy Browder Herbert & Rochelle Bass Peter & Vickie Brown Barbara S.C. Batt Linda Brueckman Edward & Amy Brantz Bedrick Laura Burnham & Richard Distel Raihana & Mirza Beg Martha Carey & Mark Tomlinson Albert & Peninah Berdugo Joan Casey & Dan Morrissy Sandra Berkowitz Mary Ellen Cassidy Kevin Bernstein & Rebecca Meyer Mary Chomitz & Morton Collier Peggy Bishop Marc & Marjorie Cohen Rochelle F. Cohen & Chris Murphy Richard Heiberger Sarah & Alan Coslov Sally & Rick Heimann William & Patricia Crawford Michael & Lynda Hershman Scott Creighton Darcy Hille & Robert Buttram Donald Cresswell & Nancy Nitzberg Catherine Hillgen Harriet Cutler Mark & Mershon Hinkel William & Penelope Cutler Joan Horvath & John Leach Joe & Rema D’Alessandro Jeanne & Richard Hughes Bill & Anne Dibble Bill Hyman & Janine Pratt Claire DiLullo & Antonio Schiavone Ketill & Ursula Ingolfsson Ruth Ann Dobnak Edward & Regina
    [Show full text]
  • Participant List
    FINLAND 20111 PARTICIPANT LIST GLASS PERFORMANCE DAYS Conference & Glass Expo 17 – 20 June, 2011 Workshops 16 – 17 June, 2011 Tampere, Finland Supporting Press 2011 2 Asianglass, UK Glaston News, Finland Architectural Glass & Industrial Glass, China Glaswelt, Germany BAU Business, Ukraine Gradimo.hr, Croatia DETAIL, Germany Intelligent Glass Solutions, UK ECC, China Lasinikkari, Finland China Building Doors Curtain Wall & Lasirakentaja, Finland Equipment, China Middle East Glass Magazine, Egypt DGG Journal, Germany O Vidroplano, Brasil e-glass weekly, USA Photon International, Germany Fereastra Magazine, Romania Photovoltaics International, Germany GFF, Germany Reed Business Information, Italy GGF, UK Refrige Portal, Spain Glassbulletin, India Revista Del Vidrioplano, Spain Glass eye, UK Rivista del Vetro, Italy The Glazine, UK Solaria, Italy Glass & Business, Russia Solar Industry Magazine, USA Glas in Beeld, the Netherlands Sun & Wind Energy, Germany Glas Ingenieur, Germany USGlass, USA Glass International, UK USGNN.com News, USA Glass Magazine, USA VERRE, France Glass Online, Italy Vitrea/Novoperfil, Spain Glass on Web, Italy Vision Publications, UK Glas + Rahmen, Germany Verre Plat, France Glass Technology International, Italy Windows. Doors. Glass Facades,Ukraine Glass Times, UK World of Glass, Greece Glass Worldwide, UK Windows Active, UK Industrial Supporters ORGANIZED BY 3 www.glaston.net GOLD SPONSORS www.dowcorning.com www.dupont.com www.edgetechig.com www.guardian.com www.solutia.com www.trosifol.com www.leyboldoptics.com SILVER SPONSORS www.bystronic-glass.com www.hegla.de Glass EXPO EXHIBITORS 4 A1 ISRA SURFACE VISION A2 HÜTTINGER A3 BOHLE A4 SEFAR A5 FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE A6 BENEQ A7 GLASSTRESS A8 VINDICO A10 SOFTECO Press tables B1 SIKA B2 RITEC B3 LEYBOLD OPTICS B4 DOW CORNING B5 BRIDGESTONE B6 HALDENWANGER B7 GLASTON Fairs C2 VESUVIUS C3 MÄKELÄ ALU & LUMON C4 CIMEC C5 SPUTTERING COMPONENTS D1A SAFETY GLASS EXPERTS D1B PHOTOSOLAR Posters D2 DR.
    [Show full text]
  • Saddleworth Sketches
    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. https://books.google.com Saddle worth ^KETCHES. I Saddleworth Sketches JOSEPH BRADBURY. OLDHAM : HIRST & RENNIE. MANCHESTER: JOHN HEYWOOD. LONDON : SIMPKIN, MARSHALL, & Co. PUBLISHERS' PREFACE. ANY of the Sketches composing the present volume appeared in the Oldham Chronicle during the winter months of 1870-1, and, in reprinting them in a more permanent form, no attempt has been made to give them the character of a History of Saddleworth. The original idea of their writer, Mr. Joseph Brad bury, has been adhered to, but, in consequence of his prolonged absence from Oldham, he has not been able to undertake the revision. One of the Sketches has been omitted, the others to some extent con densed, and the whole carefully corrected, so that it is hoped errors in circumstances and dates have been minimised, if not altogether avoided. During the task of revision, interesting material accumulated rapidly, and much has necessarily been omitted in order that the book might not become too bulky. The additions, for which Mr. Bradbury is not responsible, are the paper on "Rush Bearing in the Olden Time," kindly placed at our disposal by G. Shaw, Esq., and the three chapters following the Table of Chronology. The only considerable additions in the other Sketches are the additional facts and speculations in connection with the Green field murder, extending from page 17 to 34, and a few anecdotes respect ing the Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis for Westminster Conference
    Laura Bronner Property and Power: MPs’ Asset Type and Support for Democratization Property and Power: MPs' Asset Type and Support for Democratization in the 1867 UK Reform Act Laura Bronner, Nuffield College Working Paper Abstract Influential current theories of democratization (Acemoglu & Robinson, 2000, 2006; Boix, 2003) emphasize elites’ fear of the redistributive consequences of democratic reform as an important limit on democratization. They also argue that capital-owners are less likely than landowners to fear redistribution, as their assets are more mobile and thus easier to protect from expropriation. This thesis uses the 1867 Reform Act in the UK, which doubled the enfranchised population to include large parts of the urban working class, as a case study. It uses an original dataset on the 1865-8 House of Commons to test the claim that asset type matters for democratization, and finds that in fact, the most substantively important variable for votes on democratization was party, which has been neglected by the distributional conflict literature. While material interests, particularly landowning, matter, they are crucially mediated by partisan electoral interests. Indeed, while landowning Liberals are less democratic than non-landowning Liberals, this effect is not present among Conservatives. Using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods, this thesis contends that this effect is due to partisan electoral and material interests reinforcing one another in an anti-democratic direction among Conservatives, while for landowning
    [Show full text]
  • RHO Volume 19 Back Matter
    CAMDEN w mmL m SOCIETY. FOR THE PUBLICATION OF EARLY HISTORICAL AND LITERARY REMAINS. AT a General Meeting of the Camden Society held at the Freemasons' Tavern, Great Queen Street, Lincoln's Inn Fields, on Monday the 2nd May, 1842, THOMAS AMYOT, ESQ. F.R.S., TREAS. S.A., DIRECTOR, IN THE CHAIR. THE Director having opened the business of the Meeting, The Secretary read the Report of the Council agreed upon at their meeting of the 28th April last, whereupon it was Resolved, That the said Report be received and printed, and that the Thanks of the Society be given to the Council for their services. The Thanks of the Society were also voted to the Editors of the Society's publications; to the Right Honourable Thomas Grenville; to the Master and Fellows of St. Peter's College, Cambridge; to J. I. Black- burn, Esq. M.P.; to the Local Secretaries; and to Messrs. Nichols, for the assistance towards attaining the objects of the Society mentioned in the Report as having been given by them. The Secretary then read the Report of the Auditors, agreed upon at their meeting of the 30th of April last, whereupon it was Resolved, That the said Report be received and approved, and that the Thanks of the Society be given to the Auditors for their trouble. Thanks -were then voted to the Director, Treasurer, and Secretary for their services during the past year; and Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.226, on 25 Sep 2021 at 00:35:51, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
    [Show full text]