DOCSLIB.ORG

Report to the Commission on the Advancement of Federal Law Enforcement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report to the Commission on the Advancement of Federal Law Enforcement If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. LAW ENFORCEMENT IN A NEW CENTURY AND A CHANGING WORLD Improving the Administration of Federal law Enforcement ()F Criminal ,lustics HeierEmce Service (NC,JRS) MD 2084%000 Report of the Commission on the Advancement of Federal law Enforcement COMMISSION ON THE ADVANCEMENT Of fEDERAl LAW ENfORCEMENT January 2000 The Honorable Strom Thurmond President Pro Tempore United States Senate The Honorable Tom Daschle Minority Leader United States Senate The Honorable J. Dennis Hastert Speaker United States House of Representatives The Honorable Richard Gephardt Minority Leader United States House of Representatives The Honorable William Rehnquist Chief Justice of the United States Gentlemen: Public Law 104-132 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) pro- vided for the establishment of a Commission on the Advancement of Federal Law Enforcement. The Commission, created as an independent advisory body, was asked to report to Congress and the American People on a wide variety of matters related to Federal law enforcement. Section 806 of the legislation created this five-member Commission-one each to be appointed by the President Pro Tempore and Minority Leader of the Senate; one each by the Speal<er and Minority Leader of the House of Representatives; and one to be appointed Chair by the Chief Justice of the United States. In addition to authorizing the Commission to hold hearings in pursuit of its mandate, to sit and tal<e testimony, to administer oaths to witnesses appearing before it, and to secure information directly from any department or agency of the United States, the statute directed the Commission to submit a report to the Congress and the public within 2 years. I am pleased to submit that report. I want to aclmowledge the diligence with which my colleagues on the Commis- sian pursued the complex and wide-ranging mandate incorporated into our statute. The Commission took its responsibilities seriously, determined to be vigorous in its discussions, candid in sharing its views and opinions, and straightforward in its recommendations on what needs to be done. Although individual members some- times emphasized different issues, the Commission was unanimous in supporting the broad themes and recommendations presented in this document. I would also like to thank each of you for your confidence in the Commission's ability to complete this challenging assignment Your support helped the Commission complete its task on schedule. Finally, I would like to acknowledge the Commission staff-working under the able leadership of Executive Director Dr. Lee Colwell, General Counsel Michael E. Shaheen Jr., and Director of Research Richard J. Fera- for their unfailing service. Respectfully submitted, William H. Webster Chairman MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION ON THE ADVANCEMENT OF FEDERAl lAW ENFORCEMENT William H. Webster, Chairman Senior Partner, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy Washington, D.C. ~--Donald-C~Dahlini-------Vice-f'residennor Academrc Affarrs University of South Dakota Vermillion, South Dakota Gilbert G. Gallegos National President Fraternal Order of Police Albuquerque, New Mexico Robert E. Sanders, Esq. Attorney Punta Gorda, Florida v Robert M. Stewart Chief, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) Columbia, South Carolina Lee Colwell Executive Director Michael E. Shaheen Jr. General Counsel Richard J. Fera Director of Research Carmelita R. Pratt Administrative Officer Jacqueline A. Mitchell Executive Assistant CONTENTS Executive Summary------------------- 1 Introduction ______________________ 15 Chapter One. A Large and Complex System _________ 27 Chapter Two. Coordination: Who's in Charge of What? ____ 45 Chapter Three. Terrorism 61 T Chapter Four. Globalization of Crime ___________ 71 Chapter Five. Federalization of Crime ___________ 87 Chapter Six. Professionalism, Integrity, and Accountability __ 95 Chapter Seven. Recommendations ____________ 107 Endnotes 131 Selected Bibliography 143 vii Appendixes 159 Appendix A. Biographies of the Commissioners 160 Appendix B. Authorizing Legislation 164 Appendix C. Federal Organizations with Some Law Enforcement Functions __________ 168 Appendix D. Executive Order No. 11396 172 Appendix E. Commission Meetings and Witnesses 174 Appendix F. Expert Papers and Advisors 181 Appendix G. Personnel Authorized to Carry Firearms in 14 Federal Agencies ___________ 183 Appendix H. Acknowledgments 184 ~ tJ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY its review of the data and testimony and its deliberations were com- pleted, the Commission on the Advancement of Federal Law Enforcement reached broad agreement on several major themes and directions for the future. First and foremost, Commission members found that Federal law enforcement agencies are currently among the finest in the world_and_thaLmoslArnericans-Share-in-that-view•~.--------- (The Commission defines Federal law enforcement as the entire range of activities and operations, at tl1e national level, that are intended to prevent crime, apprehend and prosecute offenders, 1 and maintain the country's corrections system.) Second, Commission members believe that law enforcement stands at the thresh- 1 old of a new century and a changing world, and that, as the Nation moves into a new era, several challenges threaten its capacity to maintain and improve its system of Federal law enforcement. These challenges are as follows: 1. Difficult coordination challenges. Within the spectrum of Federal agencies involved in law enforcement, it is not always clear which organization has responsibility for handling specific types of crimes. Managing diverse agencies, their missions and priorities is a constant challenge. Although many examples of excellent coordination exist across Federal agencies-and among Federal, State, and local agencies-equally valid examples of poor coordination are also easy to find. The United States lacks clearly articu­ lated, easy-to-understand policies that dictate which agencies have responsi­ bilities for which areas of criminal activity and how the many Federal agen­ cies and officials with law enforcement responsibilities should coordinate their activities. In addition, poor integration of domestic and foreign intelli- gence capabilities limits effective law enforcement and is a menace to the national interest. 2. Terrorism. The threat that the easy availability of weapons of mass destruc- lion poses to American citizens is real. These devices-including conven- tiona!, biological, chemical, and even nuclear weapons-have the potential to enable individuals and groups to inflict the kind of damage on communities and civilians that was once the exclusive power of nation-states. Although incidents of terrorism have decreased in recent years, the lethal power of these types of weapons leads to more casualties. Moreover, the purposes for terrorist acts have changed. Historically, terrorists have sought political attention and influence, and their acts resulted in few deaths. Today, the goal of many terrorists is to kill large numbers of people. 3. Globalization of crime. Criminal enterprises in Asia, Europe, Latin America, and the Former Soviet Union are an increasing threat to American citizens and our national interests. Criminals are increasingly demonstrating an ability to cooperate with each other across national borders in areas such 2 as narcotics and money-laundering. Their access to and skill in using ad- vanced technologies often put U.S. law enforcement agencies at a disadvan­ tage. Modern telecommunications and computers maim large-scale theft and fraud possible through keyboards located anywhere in the world. 4. Federalization of crime. Over the years, the growth in the number of crimes considered "Federal" is startling. In 1789, perhaps a dozen crimes were considered sufficiently serious to warrant Federal attention; today that total exceeds 3,000. Federalizing common crimes-crimes that historically were the responsibility of State and local law enforcement agencies-has placed U.S. society in danger of having Federal law enforcement resources spread much too thinly. If the trend continues, the United States will develop the type of national police force that we have traditionally avoided. 5. Maintaining professionalism and demonstrating accountability. As the new century dawns, the challenge of maintaining public confidence in the integrity and competence of Federal agencies is an urgent priority. The lack of common standards that govern Federal law enforcement agency profes- sionalism, integrity, and public accountability needs to be addressed. In addition, Federal law enforcement agencies must upgrade the technological skills of officers, and the technologies available to them, if the officers are to perfonn as effective law enforcement professionals in a new century. POLICY CONClUSIONS Based on its investigation, the Commission came to five broad policy conclusions about the performance of the Federal law enforcement system. Conclusion 1. Coordination Of necessity, the Federal law enforcement apparatus is large and complex; in the face of this complexity, the Government's capacifLfor oversight and coordinatiou_js_______ _ weak and needs improvement. In addition, the proliferation of small agencies should be discouraged and the function of Inspectors General reviewed. Different agencies quite properly have different missions, as well as the need for quite distinct skills and areas of jurisdiction. Nonetheless, better coordination of operations 3 is
Load more

Recommended publications
  • General Information Pursuant to Section 55 of the Federal Data
    General information pursuant to Section 55 of the Federal Data Protection Act (Bundesdatenschutzgesetz - BDSG) regarding data processing by customs authorities in the context of criminal offences and infringements of rules of law (Last updated: December 2018) Preface Among the functions of Customs are the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of certain offences and infringements of rules of law including the enforcement of the fines imposed by the customs authorities. In order to fulfil this role, the customs services are entitled to process personal data. The information detailed in this letter concerns: • Controls under aspects of customs and movement of cash law • Procedures concerning tax-related criminal offences and infringements of rules of law • Procedures concerning criminal offences and infringements in non-tax relevant areas (excluding the Financial Monitoring Unit to Control Unreported or Illicit Employment) The information contained herein only concerns the processing of personal data by the customs authorities (main customs offices, customs investigation offices, the German Customs Criminological Office, the Federal Treasury and its branches, and the General Customs Directorate). Data processing by the tax administration (tax offices, regional finance directorates, state offices for finance, Federal Central Tax Office) is not addressed. “Personal data” means any information that directly relates to an identified or identifiable natural person. When financial authorities “process” personal data, it means that they collect, save, apply, transfer, make available for retrieval, edit or delete data. In the following we will provide information about the kind of personal data that we collect, who we collect it from, and what we do with this data. In addition, we will inform you about your privacy rights in relation to data protection and advise you on whom to contact if you have any questions or complaints.
    [Show full text]
  • Jones (Stephen) Oklahoma City Bombing Archive, 1798 – 2003 (Bulk 1995 – 1997)
    JONES (STEPHEN) OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING ARCHIVE, 1798 ± 2003 (BULK 1995 ± 1997). See TARO record at http://www.lib.utexas.edu/taro/utcah/03493/cah-03493.html (Approximately 620 linear feet) This collection is open for research use. Portions are restricted due to privacy concerns. See Archivist's Note for more details. Use of DAT and Beta tapes by appointment only; please contact repository for more information. This collection is stored remotely. Advance notice required for retrieval. Contact repository for retrieval. Cite as: Stephen Jones Oklahoma City Bombing Archive, 1798 ± 2003 (Bulk 1995 ± 1997), Dolph Briscoe Center for American History, University of Texas at Austin. [AR 98-395; 2003-055; 2005-161] ______________________________________________________________________________ BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE: Stephen Jones (born 1940) was appointed in May 1995 by the United States District Court in Oklahoma City to serve as the lead defense attorney for Timothy McVeigh in the criminal court case of United States of America v. Timothy James McVeigh and Terry Lynn Nichols. On April 19, 1995, two years to the day after the infamous Federal Bureau of Investigation and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms raid on the Branch Davidians at Waco, Texas, a homemade bomb delivered inside of a Ryder rental truck was detonated in front of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Timothy McVeigh, as well as his accomplice Terry Nichols, were accused of and, in 1997, found guilty of the crime, and McVeigh was executed in 2001. Terry Nichols is still serving his sentence of 161 consecutive life terms without the possibility of parole in the ADX Florence super maximum-security prison in Florence, Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Protocol Directorate
    Army Protocol Directorate Office of the Chief of Staff 204 Army Pentagon Washington, DC 20310-0204 Phone: (703) 697-0692/DSN 227-0692 Fax: (703)693-2114/DSN 223-2114 [email protected] Department of the Army Protocol Precedence List as of 10 December 2010 VIP Code 1 27 Secretary of Housing and Urban Development 28 Secretary of Transportation 1 President of the United States 29 Secretary of Energy 2 Heads of State/Reigning Royalty 30 Secretary of Education VIP Code 2 (Four Star Equivalent) 31 Secretary of Veterans Affairs 32 Secretary of Homeland Security 3 Vice President of the United States 33 Chief of Staff to the President 4 Governors in Own State (see #42) 34 Director, Office of Management and Budget 5 Speaker of the House of Representatives 35 US Trade Representative 6 Chief Justice of the Supreme Court 36 Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency 7 Former Presidents of the United States (by seniority of assuming office) 37 Director, National Drug Control Policy 8 U.S. Ambassadors to Foreign Governments (at post) 38 Director of National Intelligence 9 Secretary of State 39 President Pro Tempore of the Senate 10 President, United Nations General Assembly (when in session) 40 United States Senators (by seniority; when equal, alphabetically by State) 11 Secretary General of the United Nations 41 Former United States Senators (by date of retirement) 12 President, United Nations General Assembly (when not in session) 42 Governors when not in own State (by State date of entry; when equal by 13 President, International Court of Justice alphabetically) (see #4) 14 Ambassadors to Foreign Governments Accredited to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • FY'14 Mission and Governance CLEET
    Oklahoma Senate Committee on Appropriations 2013-14 Performance Report COUNCIL ON LAW ENFORCEMENT EDUCATION AND TRAINING AGENCY MISSION STATEMENT: To provide the citizens of Oklahoma with peace officers who are trained to be professional, ethical, conscientious, sensitive to needs of the public, knowledgeable and competent in identified learning objectives; and to protect the public by regulating private security in the State of Oklahoma through education and licensing requirements and to ensure licensees practice within the provision of the law. This mission was adopted in 1967 when the agency was established. LEAD ADMINISTRATOR: Steve Emmons, Executive Director, 405-239-5152 GOVERNANCE: Oklahoma Statutes Title 70, Section3311, Part A - There is hereby created a Council on Law Enforcement Education and Training which shall be, and is hereby declared to be, a governmental law enforcement agency of the State of Oklahoma, body politic and corporate, with powers of government and with the authority to exercise the rights, privileges and functions necessary to ensure the professional training and continuing education of law enforcement officers in the State of Oklahoma. These rights, privileges and functions include, but are not limited to, those specified in Sections 3311 through 3311.10 of this title and in the Oklahoma Security Guard and Private Investigator Act. The Council shall be composed of nine (9) members, the Director of the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation, one member appointed by the Governor who may be a lay person, and seven police or peace officers, one selected by each of the following: the Court of Criminal Appeals, the Commissioner of Public Safety, the Board of Directors of the Oklahoma Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, the Oklahoma Association of Police Chiefs, the Board of Directors of the Oklahoma Sheriffs’ Association, the Board of Directors of the Fraternal Order of Police and the Governor.
    [Show full text]
  • Boardwalk Empire
    BOARDWAI,K EIITPIRE ,'Pi1ot " written by Terence Wint,er FIRST DRAFT April L6, 2008 G *ffi EXT. ATLAI:i"IIC OCEAN - NIGHT With a buoy softly clangring in the dist,ance, a 90-fooE fishing schooner, the ?omoka, rocks lazily on the open ocean, waves gentLy lapping at its hulI. ON DECK BILL MCCOY, pensive , 40, checks his pocket wauch, then spius tobaeco juice as he peers into the darkness. In the distance, VgE SEE flickering lights, then HEAR the rumble of motorboats approaching, twenty in atl. Their engines idle as the first pulls up and moors alongside. BTLL MCCOY (calling dovrn) Sittin' goddamn duck out here. DANIIy MURDOCH, tough, 30s, looks up from the motorboatr, where he's accompanied. by a YOIING HOOD, 18. MIJRDOCH So move it. then, c,mon. ON DECK McCoy yanks a canvas tarp off a mountainous stack of netted earqo -- hundreds of crates marked "Canadian Club Whiskey'. WiEh worlsnanlike precision, he and three CRSWI,IAN hoist the first load of two dozen crates up and over the side, lowering it down on a pulley. As the net reaches the motorboaL: MURDOCH (CONT'D) (to the Young Hood) Liquid go1d, boyo. They finish setting the load in place, then Murdoch guns the motorboat and heads off. Another boat putters in to take his s1ot, as the next cargo neb is lowered. TBACK WITH MURDOCH'S MOTORBOAT as it heads inland through the darkness over the water. Slowly, a KINGDOM OF LIGHTS appears on the horizon, with grand hotels, massive neon signs, carnival rides and giant lighted piers li-ning its shore.
    [Show full text]
  • 1394 White Terrorism and Willful Ignorance
    #1394 White Terrorism and Willful Ignorance JAY TOMLINSON - HOST, BEST OF THE LEFT: [00:00:00] During today's episode, I am going to be telling you about a new podcast I think you should check out. It's called Unf-ing the Republic, but they don't say f-ing. It'll help level up anyone's poliDcal arguing game. So hear me out mid-show, when I tell you more about it. And now, welcome to this episode of the award-winning Best of the LeI Podcast in which we shall learn about our long history of ignoring domesDc right-wing terrorism, from the Oklahoma City bombing through to the predictable acDons of miliDa groups in 2020 and beyond. Clips today are from the PBS News Hour, It's Been a Minute with Sam Sanders, Democracy Now!, AJ+, The David Pakman Show, the Washington Post, MSNBC and The Real News. Tracing the roots of the America's biggest domesKc terror aLack - PBS News Hour - Air Date 2-17-20 MAN: [00:00:47] There's heavy damage done. JEFFREY BROWN - HOST, PBS NEWSHOUR: [00:00:51] April 19, 1995. MAN: [00:00:56] About a third of the building has been blown away. JEFFREY BROWN - HOST, PBS NEWSHOUR: [00:00:56] A Ryder rental truck with 5,000 pounds of explosives ripped through the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City; 168 people were killed, 19 children among them. WOMAN: [00:01:08] Who has come in here and done this terrible thing? BARAK GOODMAN: [00:01:12] I knew very liale of the story.
    [Show full text]
  • Larry Cosme FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS
    Representing Members From: FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS ASSOCIATION AGRICULTURE OIG Forest Service 1100 Connecticut Ave NW ▪ Suite 900 ▪ Washington, D.C. 20036 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY COMMERCE Export Enforcement Phone: 202-293-1550 ▪ www.fleoa.org OIG NOAA Fisheries Law Enforcement DEFENSE Air Force - OSI Army - CID Defense Criminal Investigative Service June 10, 2021 Naval Criminal Investigative Service OIG Police EDUCATION - OIG Honorable Gary Peters Honorable Rob Portman ENERGY National Nuclear Security Administration Chairman Ranking Member OIG ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY United States Senate HSGAC United States Senate HSGAC CID OIG Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION OIG FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY – OIG FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Federal Reserve Board Dear Chairman Peters and Ranking Member Portman, Federal Reserve Police FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING CENTER GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION - OIG HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES We write to you today to express our growing concern over the nomination of Kiran Ahuja as the Food & Drug Administration OIG next Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Director. Although we have not weighed in on this HOMELAND SECURITY Border Patrol nomination in the past, recent developments have generated concern in our association. Coast Guard Investigative Service Immigration & Customs Enforcement Customs & Border Protection Federal Air Marshal Service A nominee who would become the leader of the human resources, payroll and training entity within Federal Protective Service U.S. Secret Service the federal government with direct authority over millions of federal employees, including the over Transportation Security Administration OIG 100,000 federal law enforcement officers that protect and defend this nation every day, that often HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT - OIG becomes an arbiter of both agency and Congressional policies, should have a past record that shows INTERIOR Bureau of Indian Affairs fairness, equity and sensitivity to everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Lee Hancock Collection
    A Guide to the Lee Hancock Collection, 1975 – 2004, Bulk: 1993-2000 Collection 099 Descriptive Summary Creator: Hancock, Lee Title: Lee Hancock Collection Dates: 1975 – 2004, Bulk: 1993-2000 Abstract: Documents, clippings, videos, and other research materials represent journalist Lee Hancock’s research into the events of the Branch Davidian standoff near Waco in 1993. The materials are arranged into the following five series: Non-Branch Davidian Incidents, Media Coverage, Investigations, House of Representatives Hearings, and Lawsuits. Identification: Collection 099 Extent: 20 boxes (10 linear feet) Language: Materials are written in English Repository: Southwestern Writers Collection, Special Collections, Alkek Library, Texas State University-San Marcos Lee Hancock Collection SWWC Collection 099 Historical Sketch On February 28, 1993 the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) attempted to issue an arrest warrant for Vernon Wayne Howell and a search warrant for the Mount Carmel Center near Waco, Texas on the basis of illegal weapons possession. The Branch Davidians in Mount Carmel and the ATF began a shootout that ended in the deaths of four ATF agents and six Branch Davidians. The occupants of Mount Carmel and government agencies remained in a standoff for fifty-one days until the FBI launched CS gas into the compound in an effort to make the Branch Davidians exit. The CS gas assault on April 19, 1993 ended in a fire in which seventy-six people inside Mount Carmel died, including twenty-three children. After the fire a series of lawsuits and investigations began, including the 1994 criminal trial of the Branch Davidians, the 1995 congressional hearings, and a wrongful-death civil trial in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 07-589C (Filed: February 13, 2017)* *Opinion originally filed under seal on February 1, 2017 ) JEFFREY B. KING, SCOTT A. ) AUSTIN, KEVIN J. HARRIS, and ) JOHN J. HAYS, on their own behalf ) and on behalf of a class of others ) similarly situated, ) Back Pay Act; 5 U.S.C. § 5596; Class ) Action; FBI Police; 28 U.S.C. § 540C; Plaintiffs, ) Cross-Motions for Summary ) Judgment; RCFC 56 v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Joseph V. Kaplan, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs. Alexander O. Canizares, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, with whom were Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Assistant Director, Robert E. Kirschman, Jr., Director, and Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for defendant. O P I N I O N FIRESTONE, Senior Judge. Pending before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) filed by named plaintiffs Jeffrey B. King, Scott A. Austin, Kevin J. Harris, and John J. Hays, on behalf of a certified class of current and former police officers employed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) and defendant the United States (“the government”). The plaintiffs allege that they are owed back pay and other relief under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a), and the Back Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5596, on the grounds that the FBI has established a police force under 28 U.S.C. § 540C (“section 540C”) but has failed to pay police officers in accordance with the terms of section 540C.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations and Proceedings of the Joint Homeland Security Task
    Recommendations and Proceedings of the Joint Homeland Security Task Force Volume I: Report January 31, 2002 i Table of Contents VOLUME I INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………..…1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………….5 RECOMMENDATIONS……………………………………………………………..................9 PROCEEDINGS OF TASK FORCE…………………………………………………………27 4.1 Vesting Responsibility for Homeland Security in One Office…………………..…32 4.2 Enhancing Intelligence Gathering Capacity: Issues and Discussions…………..34 4.3 Cyber and Campus Terrorism Issues………………………………………….…...41 4.4 Criminal Law Amendments………………………………………...........................44 4.5 Response Recommendations.............................................................................45 4.6 Capitol Security……………………………………………………………………..…53 VOLUME II Appendix ii I. INTRODUCTION Oklahoma understands all too well the brutality of terrorism. The April 19, 1995 bombing of the Federal Building in Oklahoma City is seared into the state’s consciousness and taught the nation that terrorism can originate within our own borders. The devastating consequences of international terrorism became a profound reality to the citizens of the entire country on September 11, 2001 when terrorists turned commercial aircraft into suicide weapons of mass destruction and executed the deadliest strike on American soil in our history. Just as the nation dealt with the aftermath of the December 7, 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor, we now face a similar challenge to meet the threat of terrorism. In the war against terrorism, there may never be total, unconditional victory. Rather, we are in a protracted battle that will test our resolve and commitment as a people and a nation. There will be victories and setbacks, but we must have the will to sustain the pressure on our foes for the long-term in order to achieve measurable success. The State of Oklahoma has a responsibility to its citizens, as well as an obligation to the nation, to review its security posture and take steps to enhance security as required.
    [Show full text]
  • The Noble Experiment
    Parkland College A with Honors Projects Honors Program 2014 The obleN Experiment Scarlett Longdon Parkland College Recommended Citation Longdon, Scarlett, "The oN ble Experiment" (2014). A with Honors Projects. 129. https://spark.parkland.edu/ah/129 Open access to this Essay is brought to you by Parkland College's institutional repository, SPARK: Scholarship at Parkland. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Scarlett Longdon Final Project History 105-201 Parkland College THE NOBLE EXPERIMENT Many in the early twentieth century believed alcohol to be responsible for the many problems plaguing America. Groups like the Women’s Christian Temperance Union and the Anti-Saloon League pressed for prohibition laws banning the sale, manufacture and consumption of alcohol in the belief that it would reduce unemployment, domestic violence and poverty. With a massive push that was decades in the making, the Eighteenth Amendment is passed and prohibition takes effect in January 1920. With the desire to drink still looming over everyone, the illegal alcohol or moonshining business boomed, causing more problems in America and not fixing the old ones. The rate of alcoholism rose, and many even began dying off from the illegal poisonous alcohol they were consuming. Prohibition is when the infamous gangster Al Capone came to light, with many others like him murdering others to make a buck. Prohibition ended as a failure due to many reasons. The American’s determination to get drunk and make money overwhelmed the laws passed to prevent it. How illegal alcohol, money, and the people pulling the strings on both sides ended prohibition before it was even able to start will be the focus of my paper.
    [Show full text]
  • The BG News April 20, 1993
    Bowling Green State University ScholarWorks@BGSU BG News (Student Newspaper) University Publications 4-20-1993 The BG News April 20, 1993 Bowling Green State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/bg-news Recommended Citation Bowling Green State University, "The BG News April 20, 1993" (1993). BG News (Student Newspaper). 5532. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/bg-news/5532 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Publications at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in BG News (Student Newspaper) by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@BGSU. Weather Today: breezy with Softball sensation Lisa Mountjoy showers & thunderstorms The Big Six: BG's wealthiest pours it on from the pitching and a high in the 50s. private landowners. mound. *ti ><? The BG News Tuesday, April 20,1993 The BG News Volume 75, Issue 139 Koresh compound destroyed by flames by Laura Tolley end to the standoff. Ricks said multiple witnesses spotted said the agency believed no tunnel The fire erupted while television The Associated Press Eight cult members who escaped the cult members setting several fires. system would have allowed people to cameras provided live coverage of an flames are believed by federal officials One person. Ricks said, "was knelt survive the fire. armored vehicle battering a hole into to be the only survivors, but authorities down with his hands cupped, from "It's a bad end and one of the ends we the compound's first story.
    [Show full text]