Iacp New Members
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
General Information Pursuant to Section 55 of the Federal Data
General information pursuant to Section 55 of the Federal Data Protection Act (Bundesdatenschutzgesetz - BDSG) regarding data processing by customs authorities in the context of criminal offences and infringements of rules of law (Last updated: December 2018) Preface Among the functions of Customs are the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of certain offences and infringements of rules of law including the enforcement of the fines imposed by the customs authorities. In order to fulfil this role, the customs services are entitled to process personal data. The information detailed in this letter concerns: • Controls under aspects of customs and movement of cash law • Procedures concerning tax-related criminal offences and infringements of rules of law • Procedures concerning criminal offences and infringements in non-tax relevant areas (excluding the Financial Monitoring Unit to Control Unreported or Illicit Employment) The information contained herein only concerns the processing of personal data by the customs authorities (main customs offices, customs investigation offices, the German Customs Criminological Office, the Federal Treasury and its branches, and the General Customs Directorate). Data processing by the tax administration (tax offices, regional finance directorates, state offices for finance, Federal Central Tax Office) is not addressed. “Personal data” means any information that directly relates to an identified or identifiable natural person. When financial authorities “process” personal data, it means that they collect, save, apply, transfer, make available for retrieval, edit or delete data. In the following we will provide information about the kind of personal data that we collect, who we collect it from, and what we do with this data. In addition, we will inform you about your privacy rights in relation to data protection and advise you on whom to contact if you have any questions or complaints. -
Army Protocol Directorate
Army Protocol Directorate Office of the Chief of Staff 204 Army Pentagon Washington, DC 20310-0204 Phone: (703) 697-0692/DSN 227-0692 Fax: (703)693-2114/DSN 223-2114 [email protected] Department of the Army Protocol Precedence List as of 10 December 2010 VIP Code 1 27 Secretary of Housing and Urban Development 28 Secretary of Transportation 1 President of the United States 29 Secretary of Energy 2 Heads of State/Reigning Royalty 30 Secretary of Education VIP Code 2 (Four Star Equivalent) 31 Secretary of Veterans Affairs 32 Secretary of Homeland Security 3 Vice President of the United States 33 Chief of Staff to the President 4 Governors in Own State (see #42) 34 Director, Office of Management and Budget 5 Speaker of the House of Representatives 35 US Trade Representative 6 Chief Justice of the Supreme Court 36 Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency 7 Former Presidents of the United States (by seniority of assuming office) 37 Director, National Drug Control Policy 8 U.S. Ambassadors to Foreign Governments (at post) 38 Director of National Intelligence 9 Secretary of State 39 President Pro Tempore of the Senate 10 President, United Nations General Assembly (when in session) 40 United States Senators (by seniority; when equal, alphabetically by State) 11 Secretary General of the United Nations 41 Former United States Senators (by date of retirement) 12 President, United Nations General Assembly (when not in session) 42 Governors when not in own State (by State date of entry; when equal by 13 President, International Court of Justice alphabetically) (see #4) 14 Ambassadors to Foreign Governments Accredited to the U.S. -
State Police · ([, , -Faa.' * ¥S@ N
If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. , , \~\ .... , i > or <::::,•. " Maryland state Police · ([, , -fAA.' * ¥S@ n • '- . " , , • .. '. , , '., M • Q triOJl3 • , , " , ~""'"., " · ,', (0703 CJ • 107039 U.S. Department of JUstice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of • Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been granted by ~1aryland State Police • to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). FUrther reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis sion of the copyright owner. • ANNU~L REPORT • • • GEORGE B· BROSAN SUPERINTENDENT • PREPARED By: PLANNING AND RESEARCH UIVISION MARYLAND STATE POLICE • • STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES BISHOP L. ROBINSON MARYLAND STATE POLICE SECmTARY PIKESVILLE, MARYLAND 21208-3899 PUBL IC SAFETY AND WIL.LlAM DONALD SCHAEFER CORRECTIONAL SERVICES • - GOVERNOR AREA CODE 301 486-3101 TTY FOR DEAF AREA CODE 301 488-0677 John J. O'Neill MELVIN A. STEINBERG Acting Superintendent LT. GOVEnNOR MARYLAND STATE POLICE June 26 I 1987 • The Honorable WillIam Donald Schaefer Governor of the State of Maryland State House Annapolis, Maryland 21404 • Dear Governor Schaefer: The Maryland State PolIce Is pleased to submit to you the 1986 Annual Report which reflects the services this Agency rendered to the citizens of Maryland during the year. • The Anti-Driving While IntoxIcated (OWl) efforts continue to be effec tive. In 1986, the percentage of alcohol related accidents was at an all time low of 47.5 percent. -
Testimony of Robert J
Government of the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department Testimony of Robert J. Contee, III Acting Chief of Police Capitol Complex Security Failures on January 6, 2021 United States House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations Honorable Rosa L. DeLauro, Chairwoman Honorable Kay Granger, Ranking Member January 26, 2021 U.S. House of Representatives Virtual Briefing Washington, D.C. Good morning, Chairwoman DeLauro, Ranking Member Granger, and members of the Committee. I am Robert J. Contee, III, the Acting Chief of Police of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia, the primary police force in the District of Columbia. I appreciate this opportunity to brief you on the events of January 6, 2021, a dark day for our country. It is critically important that we – members of Congress, District leaders and policy makers, D.C. residents, and all Americans – find answers to questions about the 6th. I will relate to you the facts as we know them at this time, based on the point of view of MPD and the government of the District of Columbia. As with any event with multiple agencies, thousands of people, and almost as many cameras as people, there will inevitably be several perspectives and possibly inconsistencies that will need to be aligned as we gather more information. That process has been understandably delayed by the massive security operations around the 59th Presidential Inauguration, but certainly will be a focus for all involved agencies in the months to come. Mayor Muriel Bowser and the Metropolitan Police Department take pride in protecting all groups, regardless of their beliefs, who come to the nation’s capital to exercise their First Amendment rights “peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”1 The Metropolitan Police Department is a recognized leader in protecting and supporting these peaceful assemblies. -
State Highway Patrols-Their Functions and Financing
State Highway Patrols-Their Functions and Financing EDWARD A. GLADSTONE and THOMAS W. COOPER, U.S. Bureau of Public Roads, Office of Planning •CONCERN FOR the safety of the motoring public, and the importance of the state police organizations in enforcing traffic and safety laws, was voiced by the governors of most of the 47 states in which the legislatures met in regular session in 1965. In state after state the governor's message emphasized highway safety and pointed to the need for additional highway patrol troops to curb highway accidents and fatalities. In at least 30 states requests were made for an increase in patrol strength, either by the governor, by legislative committees, or by safety agencies. Collectively, specific requests were made in 21 states for nearly 3, 800 troopers to be added to the patrol strength within the next onP. to four years. A summary of the requests (as of mid-1965) is given in Table 1. If approved, these requests would increase patrol strength by an average of 23 percent. TAB LE 1 REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL PATROL TROOPERS, SUBMITTED TO 1965 STATE LEGISLATURES BY GOVERNORS, LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEES, OR OTHERS Number Number St,it,,, (uhPr" stl\te~) State (where stated) Arkansas - New York 112 California 195 North Carolina 200 (4 years) Florida 212 Ohio 4-00 (2 years) Georgia 8o (2 years) Oklahoma 100 (2 years) Illinois 8oo ( 4 years) Pennsylvanla 300 Indiena 150 South Carolina - Iowa 100 (2 years) South Dakota - KMSt\8 50 Tennessee 100 Maryland 4o Texas - Michigan 200 Utah 20 Minnesota 368 (by 1973) Vermont 42 (2 years) Missouri 250 Washington - Nebraska 50 West Virginia - Nevada - Wisconsin - New Mexico 10 Wyoming - Source: Daily legislative bulletins published by the National. -
IACM Annual Report
The Netherlands 2012 IACM Annual Report Official Journal of the International Association of customs and Tax Museums -1- IACM ANNUAL REPORT 2012 OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CUSTOMS AND TAX MUSEUMS www.customsmuseums.org -2- EDITORAL Dear friends and colleagues of the IACM. Nearly a year has already past since we had our annual conference and general assembly in Rot- terdam and Antwerp. We had the honor and pleasure to visit the new museum in Rotterdam. Our dutch colleagues can be proud of their building and the interior. Modern aspects have been melted with old parts to become a jewelry of a museum. It must be a pleasure to work in these rooms and also the visitors will get fully satisfaction during their visit. Everybody who didn’t attend our meeting, miss some- thing. But also our colleagues in Antwerp ere proud to present their new customs museum. A totally other style, but also very pleasant to visit. The exhibition gives an overview on customs life during the last decades in a visitor’s easy comprehension. If you are in Antwerp, just have a look at the museum, you will not regret. Another good news came from Vienna in Austria, where the customs museum build-up by our friend Ferdinand Hampl has found a new home and a new curator. So if you are in Austria, take contact with Helmut Gram and have a visit of the Austrian museum. Our exhibition together with the WCO in Brussels is still actual and can be visited till October of this year. -
Wilkins V. Maryland State Police
Wilkins v. Maryland State Police "^ irHH •••HBW H m !••••• «• •• IIP • •• •• PP-MD-002-007 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ROBERT L. WILKINS, ) individually and on behalf of ) all other persons similarly ) situated, ) 1620 Fuller Street, N.W. ) Apartment #505 ) Washington, D.C., 20009, ) ) NORMAN SCOTT EL-AMIN, ) individually and on behalf of ) all other persons similarly ) situated, ) 15271 Waterwheel Terrace ) Woodbridge, Virginia 22191, ) ) NU'MAN W. EL-AMIN, ) individually and on behalf of ) all other persons similarly ) situated, ) 5761 Harwich Court ) Apartment #222 ) Alexandria, Virginia 22311, ) ) and > ) AQUILA ABDULLAH, ) individually and on behalf of ) all other persons similarly ) situated, . ) 5761 Harwich Court ) Apartment #222 ) Alexandria, Virginia 22311, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) CÌVÌI NO. fÅiSQ ¿?3 ) ) MARYLAND STATE POLICE, ) SERVE: ) Colonel Larry W. Tolliver ) Superintendent, ) Maryland State Police ) 1201 Reisterstown Road ) Pikesville, Maryland 21208, ) ) TFC. BRYAN W. HUGHES, ¯ ) Badge #1817, ) individually and in his official ) capacity, ) Barrack "C" Cumberland ) 1125 National Highway ) Cumberland, Maryland, 21502, ) ) TFC. EDWARD V. SYRACUSE, ) Badge #3152, ) . · individually and in his official ) capacity, ) Aviation Division ) Cumberland Section ) Rt. 1, Box 100 ) Wiley Ford, West Virginia 26767, ) ) DEPUTY SHERIFF RONALD BROWN, ) individually and in his official ) capacity, ) 708 Furnace Street ) Cumberland, Maryland 21502, ) ) JOHN W. STOTLER, ) in his official capacity as ) President -
Review of Police Disciplinary Procedures in Maryland and Other States Review of Police Disciplinary Procedures in Maryland and Other States
Review of Police Disciplinary Procedures in Maryland and Other States Review of Police Disciplinary Procedures in Maryland and Other States Project X-47 Prepared by Jeanne E. Bilanin Institute for Governmental Service University of Maryland Center for Applied Policy Studies 4511 Knox Road, Suite 205 College Park, Maryland 20742 June 1999 Contents Acknowledgments ..............................................................ii Executive Summary ............................................................ iii Introduction ...................................................................1 Current Law in Maryland ...................................................1 1997 Proposal to Change Current Maryland Law .................................5 Study Methodology .......................................................5 Comparison of State Statutes ......................................................8 Officers Covered by Statutory Provisions .......................................8 Requirements Concerning Internal Investigations .................................10 Requirements Concerning Disciplinary Procedures ...............................15 Hearing Requirements ....................................................15 Hearing Board Composition ................................................18 Selection of Hearing Board Members .........................................21 Effect of Decision ........................................................22 Appeals ...............................................................25 Maryland Compared -
Internship Sites
Internship Sites Company City City of Aberdeen Aberdeen Legal Investigations, Inc. Alexandria Deputy Chief of Staff Annapolis Governor Ehrlich's Office Annapolis Senate of Maryland Annapolis Senate of Maryland Annapolis Lieutenant Governor of Maryland Annapolis House of Delegates Annapolis Senate of Maryland Annapolis House of Delegates Annapolis Senate of Maryland Annapolis House of Delegates Annapolis House of Delegates Annapolis Dept. of Defense Office of Inspector General Arlington Attorney General's Office Baltimore Maetta Young Baltimore Baltimore City Probation Baltimore Marlane Johnson, Esq. Baltimore States Attorney's Office Baltimore Judge Althea M. Handy Baltimore Judge Paul A. Smith Baltimore Baltimore City Juvenile Justice Center Baltimore Office of Attorney General Baltimore Office of the State's Attorney for Baltimore City Baltimore US Department of Justice Baltimore Maryland State Police Barrack D Bel Air Bel Air Police Dept. Bel Air Bel Air Police Dept. Bel Air Cambridge Police Dept Cambridge Superior Court of New Jersey Cape May Mental Hygiene Administration Crownsville City of Cumberland Cumberland Trent Thomas Cumberland C3I Cumberland Federal Bureaus of Prison Cumberland Michael A. Noonan, Esq. Cumberland Field Supervisor Cumberland Anderson, Rudd, Donahue & McKee Cumberland Judge of the Circuit Court Cumberland State's Attorney for Allegany County Cumberland Dept. of Parole & Probation Cumberland Alternative Sentincing Division Cumberland Allegany County Sheriff's Office Patrol Division Cumberland John Robb, Esq. -
A Rendészet Alapvonalai, Önkormányzati Rendőrség
CHRISTIÁN LÁSZLÓ A RENDÉSZET ALAPVONALAI, ÖNKORMÁNYZATI REND ŐRSÉG CHRISTIÁN LÁSZLÓ A RENDÉSZET ALAPVONALAI, ÖNKORMÁNYZATI RENDŐRSÉG UNIVERSITAS–GY ŐR Nonprofit Kft. ♦ Gy őr, 2011. Széchenyi István Egyetem Gyõr Szerz ő: Christián László ISBN: 978-963-9819-65-8 © UNIVERSITAS–GY ŐR Nonprofit Kft., 2011. Minden jog fenntartva, beleértve a sokszorosítás, a m ű b ővített, illetve rövidített válto- zata kiadásának jogát is. A kiadó írásbeli hozzájárulása nélkül sem a teljes m ű, sem an- nak része semmiféle formában nem sokszorosítható. Kiadja az UNIVERSITAS–GY ŐR Nonprofit Kft. Felel ős kiadó: A kft. mindenkori ügyvezet ője. M űszaki szerkeszt ő: Nagy Zoltán. Készült a Palatia Nyomda és Kiadó Kft. nyomdájában. Felel ős vezet ő: Radek József. TARTALOMJEGYZÉK EL ŐSZÓ ..................................................................................................................................... 9 BEVEZETÉS ........................................................................................................................... 13 KIINDULÁSI ALAPOK ......................................................................................................... 16 1. EPIZÓDOK A RENDÉSZET TÖRTÉNETÉB ŐL .................................................... 29 1.1. A KEZDETEKR ŐL .................................................................................................... 29 1.2. RÓMA , IUS PUBLICUM ............................................................................................ 30 1.3. „S ÖTÉT KÖZÉPKOR ”?! ........................................................................................... -
Department of State Police Department of State Police Summary of Department of State Police Summary of Maryland State Police
Maryland State Police MISSION To ensure Maryland is a safe place to live, work and visit. VISION To serve and protect the citizens of Maryland while remaining focused on our core values of integrity, fairness and service. KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES Goal 1. Prevent and investigate crime while supporting allied law enforcement agencies. Obj. 1.1 Use task forces, drug interdiction units, forensic and intelligence data to identify and arrest perpetrators of criminal acts. Performance Measures 2014 Act. 2015 Act. 2016 Act. 2017 Act. 2018 Act. 2019 Est. 2020 Est. Number of local drug task force investigations 1,366 1,810 1,731 1,977 1,898 1,900 1,900 Number of arrests 752 789 1,567 842 586 650 650 Number of drug interdiction investigations – Package Unit 476 366 406 362 281 300 300 Number of drug interdiction arrests 253 179 124 134 99 130 130 Amount of seized cash assets $2,853,638 $1,857,260 $8,428,716 $4,871,208 $7,311,121 $4,000,000 $3,700,000 Amount of forfeited cash assets $2,556,161 $3,508,238 $152,513 $251,969 $707,906 $450,000 $300,000 597 Amount of seized non-cash assets $1,438,065 $751,997 $521,111 $514,394 $534,704 $400,000 $400,000 Amount of forfeited non-cash assets $151,555 $117,771 $212,854 $82,380 $111,792 $120,000 $125,000 Obj. 1.2 The Vehicle Theft Prevention Council will assist jurisdictions having the highest auto theft rates by disseminating grant funding for special enforcement and prevention projects. -
Law Enforcement Career Information
LLaaww EEnnffoorrcceemmeenntt CCaarreeeerr IInnffoorrmmaattiioonn U.S. Customs and Border Protection Protection Officer Agriculture Specialist Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Criminal Investigator Industry Operations Investigator FBI Special Agent Central Intelligence Agency U.S. Military Police NYS Environmental Conservation Officer NYS Forest Ranger NYS Park Police NYS Trooper NYS Police Forensic Investigation Officer NYS University Police Officer NYS Correction Officer Schoharie County Deputy Sheriff Schoharie County Probation Officer Local Law Enforcement Police Officer SUNY Cobleskill Career Development Center BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES CRIMINAL INVESTIGATOR (SPECIAL AGENT), Grade 5 ORGANIZATION’S NAME: U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives JOB DUTIES: Highly trained special agents are responsible for investigating violations of Federal law relating to firearms, explosives, arson and alcohol and tobacco diversion. These investigations involve surveillance, interviewing suspects and witnesses, making arrests, obtaining and executing search warrants, and searching for physical evidence. EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS: A bachelor’s degree from an accredited college or university OR three years of general experience, one of which was equivalent to at least the grade 4 OR a combination of education and experience. Education is credited on the basis of 30 semester hours or 45 quarter hours of undergraduate work which is equivalent to 9 months of work experience. APPLICATION PROCESS: All applicants must take and pass the ATF Treasury Enforcement Agent (TEA) examination and the ATF special agent applicant assessment to be eligible for further consideration for agent positions. Applicants must meet basic qualifications. Applications for position openings or testing opportunities will only by accepted in response to a specific ATF job notice or vacancy announcement.