Comparison of Professional Positions and Duties Between State Park Peace Officers and Game Wardens for Texas Parks and Wildlife

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Comparison of Professional Positions and Duties Between State Park Peace Officers and Game Wardens for Texas Parks and Wildlife COMPARISON OF PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS AND DUTIES BETWEEN STATE PARK PEACE OFFICERS AND GAME WARDENS FOR TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT by Richard G. Powe, B. B. A. Accounting; B. S. Geog Resource & Enviro Stdies A directed research project submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Geography with a Major in Geog Resource & Enviro Stdies May 2021 Committee Chair Directed Research Advisor: Dr. Andrew Sansom Committee Member: Dr. Jennifer Devine Texas State University Graduate Program in Geography i COPYRIGHT by Richard G. Powe 2021 ii FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, Richard G. Powe, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. iii DEDICATION The devotion and sense of appreciation goes out to those people who have assisted during the pursuit of this academic goal and endeavor. Most know who they are, yet the specific person would be the author’s father, Richard E. Powe, who is the first to help in the initial education about nature and how to catch a fish, many years in the past, only to look and find the path found here, and now. Never could have figured out the way of fishing, if it were not for the dedication and instruction. May peace always be found over the spirit whom blessed us at his time of departure. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people influenced this project's structure and the development of the Comparison of Professional Positions and Duties Between State Park Pease Officers and Game Wardens for Texas Parks and Wildlife Department construction. For their collaboration and contributions, special thanks are given to Chief Wes Masur, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) Leader of the State Park Police Officers, Colonel Chad Jones (TPWD) Lieutenant Colonel of the prestigious Texas Game Wardens, along with the peace officers who took the survey. Texas State University provided many folks who were critical to the work: Dr. Andrew Sansom Professor of Practice, Parks and Protected Places, Conservation Leadership/Problems in Applied Geography, and Directed Research Advisor, Dr. Jennifer A. Devine Assistant Professor, and Committee Member, Dr. John P. Tiefenbacher Professor Natural Use and Resources, Applied Research Design, and Air Quality Management, Dr. Christi G. Townsend Senior Lecturer Physical Geography, Richard A. Earl Retired Professor Water Resources, Environmental Management, Mr. Neil Kucera Lecturer, Energy Resource Management, Elements of Environmental Law, Dr. Colleen C. Myles Associate Professor, Interpretive Environmental Geography, Dr. Alberto Giordano Professor Applied Human Geography, Dr. Nathan A. Currit, Environmental Problems on the US/Mexico Border, Dr. Osvaldo Muniz-Solari and Dr. Michael Solem, Dr. Ronald R. Hagelmam, Dr. Kimberly M. Meitzen, Dr. Alexander (Sasha) Savelyev, Marc Carter, Shelly Plant, Dr. Zhan, and special thanks to Ayodeji E Iyanda Ph. D. Candidate (Texas State University). Additional thanks to my wife, Belsa O. Powe, for putting up with many days of my struggles with pressures and then a debilitating injury that we bore along with my mother, Luann Powe, and friends Roberto Garcia, John Walker, and S. Brent Brotzman, MD, without their help, this endeavor would have never completed. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS …………………………………………………………... v TABLE OF CONTENTS …………………………………………………………….. vi LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………………viii LIST OF FIGURES …………………………………………………………………… x ABSTRACT …………………………………………………………………………… xi INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………… 1 BACKGROUND ……………………………………………………………………….. 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ………………………………………………………………. 3 Green Crimes …………………………………………………………… 3 Protecting the Environment …………………………………………...... 5 Peace Officer Roles …………………………………………………….. 6 Volunteer Engagement …………………………………………………. 8 Educational Requirements ……………………………………………… 9 Former Game Warden Interviews Texas Parks and Wildlife …………... 9 Agency Review of Law Enforcement Structure ……………………….. 13 Project Management ………………………………………………….... 15 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………... 16 METHODOLOGY …………………………………………………………………….. 17 DATA Analytical Approach ………………………………………………………….... 30 vi TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page INTERVIEW AND SURVEY RESULTS with DISCUSSION ……………………….. 32 CONCLUSION ………………………………………………………………………..... 94 APPEDICES ………………………………………………………………………........ 97 A. Salary Table 16 Texas Game Wardens .…………………………………....... 97 Salary Table 17 SPPO ……………………………………………………...... 98 Salary Table 18 Texas Game Wardens and SPPO (Chief Masur) …………... 99 B. Appendix B: Table 19 Texas Parks and Wildlife Department parks ………..102 C. Appendix C: Ecoregions of Texas …………………………………………. 106 D. LE Structure ………………………………………………………………… 107 State Park Law Enforcement Program Data ……………………………. 107 State Park Police Salary percentage below schedule "C" stipends …….. 107 Recommendations ………………………………………………………. 108 Conservation Law Enforcement Case Study ……………………………. 111 E. Appendix E: Interview Transcriptions …………………………………….... 112 State Park Police Officer Chief Wes Masur ……………………………….... 112 Game Warden, Colonel, Chad Jones ………………………………………... 134 REFERENCES ………………………………………………………………………….. 160 vii LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Survey Questions 1 through 6, Age Range, Race/Ethnicity, Gender, Education, Income Range, Years of Service …………………………… 24 2. Survey Question Green Criminology Theory ………………………………………... 24 3. Survey Question Protecting the Environment (Agency Mission) …………………..... 25 4. Survey Question Protecting the Environment (Agency Mission) ……………………. 26 5. Survey Question Peace Officer Roles (Scope of Power) (Specialized Training) …….. 26 6. Survey Question Volunteer Engagement ……………………………………………... 27 7. Survey Question Educational Requirement …………………………………………… 28 ***COVID -19 Amendment. …………………………………………... 29 8. Survey Results Question 6. Years of Experience ties with Figure 6 ......………………. 73 9. Survey Question 7 Results. Green Criminology ……………………………………… 76 10. Survey Question 8 Results. Protecting the Environment (Agency Mission) ………… 78 11. Survey Question 9 Results. Protecting the Environment (Agency Mission) ………… 80 12. Survey Question 10 Results. Peace Officer Roles (Scope of Power) (Specialized Training) ………………………………...... 82 13. Survey Question 11 Results. Volunteer Engagement …………………………………. 84 14. Survey Question 12 Results. Educational Requirement……………………………….. 84 15. Survey Question 13 Results Kindly leave comments on experience ………………...... 89 16. Salaries for Texas Game Wardens .……………………………………………………. 97 viii LIST OF TABLES (Continued) Table Page 17. Salaries SPPO ………….……………………………………………………………. 98 17.1 Game warden and state park police officer < 4 years pay variance………………… 98 18. Salary Texas Game Wardens and SPPO (Chief Masur) …………………………….. 99 19. State Parks at Texas Parks and Wildlife Department ……………………………….. 105 20. Ecoregions of Texas ………………………………………………………………… 106 ix LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Question 1. Survey Results. Age Range Count and Percentage, graph .……………… 68 2. Question 2. Survey Results. Income Range and Count and Percentage, graph ……… 69 3. Question 3. Survey Results. Race/Ethnicity Count and Percentage, graph …………… 70 4. Question 4. Survey Results. Gender Count and Percentage. graph …………………… 71 5. Question 5. Survey Results. Education Count and Percentage, graph ………………… 72 6. Question 6. Survey Results. Year of Experience Count and Percentage, graph ………. 74 7. Survey Question 7 Green Criminology, graph ………………………………………… 77 8. Survey Question 8. Protecting Environment (Agency Mission), graph. ………………. 79 9. Survey Question 9. Location. Protecting Environment (Agency Mission), graph………81 10. Survey Question 10. Scope of Power (Specialized Training), graph …………………83 11. Survey Question 11. Volunteer Engagement, graph …………………………………. 85 12. Survey Question 12. Educational Requirements, graph ……………………………… 88 13. Figure 13. Texas State Parks. Taken from Wikipedia ……………………………….. 102 14. Texas Counties, 254 Taken from OntheWorldmap.com …………………………….. 105 x ABSTRACT The paper discusses how the conservation officer deals with culture and today's society's duties—learning the behavioral characteristics that distinguish between a state park police officer and game warden for the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD). A literature review reveals data on game wardens and protection of wildlife and looking more into the data collected from qualitative formats and keeping an eye on identifying emergent themes related to criteria components. Each of these themes will be discussed in greater detail with descriptive, quantitative statistics. To better understand each peace officer experience, interviews for the State Park Police Officers (SPPO) leaders and the Game Wardens (GW) for Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. The survey's relationship to determine respondents' collections of questions will focus on the information and the decisions they made. This survey will focus on five areas: 1. Green criminology theory, 2. Protecting the Environment (Agency Mission), 3. Peace Officer Roles (Scope of
Recommended publications
  • 4-Year Work Plan by District for Fys 2015-2018
    4 Year Work Plan by District for FYs 2015 - 2018 Overview Section §201.998 of the Transportation code requires that a Department Work Program report be provided to the Legislature. Under this law, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) provides the following information within this report. Consistently-formatted work program for each of TxDOT's 25 districts based on Unified Transportation Program. Covers four-year period and contains all projects that the district proposes to implement during that period. Includes progress report on major transportation projects and other district projects. Per 43 Texas Administrative Code Chapter 16 Subchapter C rule §16.106, a major transportation project is the planning, engineering, right of way acquisition, expansion, improvement, addition, or contract maintenance, other than the routine or contracted routine maintenance, of a bridge, highway, toll road, or toll road system on the state highway system that fulfills or satisfies a particular need, concern, or strategy of the department in meeting the transportation goals established under §16.105 of this subchapter (relating to Unified Transportation Program (UTP)). A project may be designated by the department as a major transportation project if it meets one or more of the criteria specified below: 1) The project has a total estimated cost of $500 million or more. All costs associated with the project from the environmental phase through final construction, including adequate contingencies and reserves for all cost elements, will be included in computing the total estimated cost regardless of the source of funding. The costs will be expressed in year of expenditure dollars. 2) There is a high level of public or legislative interest in the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeological Survey Investigations at Martin Creek Lake State Park, Rusk County, Texas
    Volume 2011 Article 11 2011 Archeological Survey Investigations at Martin Creek Lake State Park, Rusk County, Texas Timothy K. Perttula Heritage Research Center, Stephen F. Austin State University, [email protected] Bo Nelson Heritage Research Center, Stephen F. Austin State University, [email protected] Jon C. Lohse [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Perttula, Timothy K.; Nelson, Bo; and Lohse, Jon C. (2011) "Archeological Survey Investigations at Martin Creek Lake State Park, Rusk County, Texas," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2011, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.21112/ita.2011.1.11 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2011/iss1/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Archeological Survey Investigations at Martin Creek Lake State Park, Rusk County, Texas Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2011/iss1/11 Archeological Survey Investigations at Martin Creek Lake State Park, Rusk County, Texas by Timothy K.
    [Show full text]
  • LONE STAR STATE Stargazing
    LONE STAR STATE Stargazing IndependenceTitle.com Keep Your Eyes to the Sky! These are some of the best places to stargaze in Texas Big Bend National Park Big Bend National Park is not only Texas’s most famous park— it is also known as one of the most outstanding places in North America for star gazing. Thanks to the sparse human occupation of this region, it has the least light pollution of any other National Park unit in the lower 48 states. This can be a real surprise to visitors when they are outside in Big Bend at night and see the Milky Way in its full glory for perhaps the first time in their life. Needless to say, you can stargaze just about anywhere in Big Bend, but there are a few spots you might want to consider. If you’re an admirer of astronomy, bring your telescope to the Marathon Sky Park. You can also see the stars from the stargazing platform atop Eve’s Garden Bed and Breakfast in Marathon. Brazos Bend State Park Located an hour outside of Houston, Brazos Bend State Park is a great place for any astronomical enthusiast. Not only is it far removed from the light pollution of the Lone Star State’s biggest city, it’s home to the George Observatory, where visitors can view planetary objects up close and personal. LONE STAR STATE Caprock Canyons State Park Home to the only wild bison herd in the state of Texas, Caprock Canyon State Park in the Texas panhandle has stunning views of constellations.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks, Recreation and Open Space M Aster Plan
    December 2009 Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc. Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Page 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgements Chapter 1 - Introduction Chapter 2 - Community Profi le and Park & Recreation Resources Chapter 3 - The Planning Process and Standards Chapter 4 - Needs Assessments Chapter 5 - Environmental Preservation and Open Space Plan Chapter 6 - Priorities, Reccommendations and Implementation Bibliography Appendix Page 2 Acknowledgements City Council Ted Reynolds, Mayor Dr. Robert Kelly, District 1 Gayle White, District 2 Dale Sturgeon, District 3 John Warren, Mayor Pro Tem, District 4 Parks and Recreation Board Ben Oefi nger, Chairman Casey Dugger Jeff LeClair Burt Powell Barbara Robinson Randy Stone Mary Ann Wheatley City Staff Chester R. Nolen, City Manager Rick Holden, Assistant City Manager Max Robertson, Director Parks & Recreation Division Mike Utecht, Superintendent of Parks and Recreation Kristi Dempsey, Parks & Recreation Gina Moore, Recreation Manager Donna Jackson Zimmerman, Director of Development Services Ann Powell, City Planner Project Team Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc. Linda Jordan, Project Manager Suzanne C. Sweek, RLA, ASLA, Project Coordinator Cathy Acuna, Planner Michael Kashuba, Planner Raymond Turco and Associates Raymond Turco Page 3 Page 4 Chapter 1 Introduction This plan has been prepared in compliance Standards developed for Cleburne and discussed with the guidelines for park and recreation in Chapter 3. “Our mission is to enhance the quality of life system master plans established by Texas Parks in Cleburne through people, places, programs & Wildlife (TP&W). TP&W provides a variety Preservation of the City’s natural environment is and partnerships.” - Cleburne Parks and of matching grant programs, and master plans discussed in Chapter 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Assessment for North Texas Optimization of Airspace and Procedures in the Metroplex
    Draft Environmental Assessment for North Texas Optimization of Airspace and Procedures in the Metroplex Volume II - Appendices September 2013 Prepared by: United States Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Fort Worth, Texas Table of Contents APPENDIX A A.1 First Early Notification Announcement................................................................................ 1 A.1.1 Early Notification Letters ..................................................................................................... 1 A.1.2 Comments Received From the First Announcement........................................................23 A.1.3 Outreach Meetings............................................................................................................49 APPENDIX B B.1 List of Preparers.................................................................................................................. 1 B.1 Receiving Parties & Draft EA Notification of Availability..................................................... 3 APPENDIX C C.1 Contact Information............................................................................................................. 1 C.2 References.......................................................................................................................... 1 APPENDIX D D.1 List of Acronyms.................................................................................................................. 1 D.2 Glossary .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch
    Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas Texans Outdoors: An Analysis of 1985 Participation in Outdoor Recreation Activities By Kathryn N. Nichols and Andrew P. Goldbloom Under the Direction of James A. Deloney November, 1989 Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, Texas 78744 (512) 389-4900 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Conducting a mail survey requires accuracy and timeliness in every single task. Each individualized survey had to be accounted for, both going out and coming back. Each mailing had to meet a strict deadline. The authors are indebted to all the people who worked on this project. The staff of the Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division, deserve special thanks. This dedicated crew signed letters, mailed, remailed, coded, and entered the data of a twenty-page questionnaire that was sent to over twenty-five thousand Texans with over twelve thousand returned completed. Many other Parks Division staff outside the branch volunteered to assist with stuffing and labeling thousands of envelopes as deadlines drew near. We thank the staff of the Information Services Section for their cooperation in providing individualized letters and labels for survey mailings. We also appreciate the dedication of the staff in the mailroom for processing up­ wards of seventy-five thousand pieces of mail. Lastly, we thank the staff in the print shop for their courteous assistance in reproducing the various documents. Although the above are gratefully acknowledged, they are absolved from any responsibility for any errors or omissions that may have occurred. ii TEXANS OUTDOORS: AN ANALYSIS OF 1985 PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR RECREATION ACTIVITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land
    United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 1 Texas - 48 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp. Date Cong. Element Approved District ANDERSON 396 - XXX D PALESTINE PICNIC AND CAMPING PARK CITY OF PALESTINE $136,086.77 C 8/23/1976 3/1/1979 2 719 - XXX D COMMUNITY FOREST PARK CITY OF PALESTINE $275,500.00 C 8/23/1979 8/31/1985 2 ANDERSON County Total: $411,586.77 County Count: 2 ANDREWS 931 - XXX D ANDREWS MUNICIPAL POOL CITY OF ANDREWS $237,711.00 C 12/6/1984 12/1/1989 19 ANDREWS County Total: $237,711.00 County Count: 1 ANGELINA 19 - XXX C DIBOLL CITY PARK CITY OF DIBOLL $174,500.00 C 10/7/1967 10/1/1971 2 215 - XXX A COUSINS LAND PARK CITY OF LUFKIN $113,406.73 C 8/4/1972 6/1/1973 2 297 - XXX D LUFKIN PARKS IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LUFKIN $49,945.00 C 11/29/1973 1/1/1977 2 512 - XXX D MORRIS FRANK PARK CITY OF LUFKIN $236,249.00 C 5/20/1977 1/1/1980 2 669 - XXX D OLD ORCHARD PARK CITY OF DIBOLL $235,066.00 C 12/5/1978 12/15/1983 2 770 - XXX D LUFKIN TENNIS IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LUFKIN $51,211.42 C 6/30/1980 6/1/1985 2 879 - XXX D HUNTINGTON CITY PARK CITY OF HUNTINGTON $35,313.56 C 9/26/1983 9/1/1988 2 ANGELINA County Total: $895,691.71 County Count: 7 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 2 Texas - 48 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Forts Trail Region
    CatchCatch thethe PioPionneereer SpiritSpirit estern military posts composed of wood and While millions of buffalo still roamed the Great stone structures were grouped around an Plains in the 1870s, underpinning the Plains Indian open parade ground. Buildings typically way of life, the systematic slaughter of the animals had included separate officer and enlisted troop decimated the vast southern herd in Texas by the time housing, a hospital and morgue, a bakery and the first railroads arrived in the 1880s. Buffalo bones sutler’s store (provisions), horse stables and still littered the area and railroads proved a boon to storehouses. Troops used these remote outposts to the bone trade with eastern markets for use in the launch, and recuperate from, periodic patrols across production of buttons, meal and calcium phosphate. the immense Southern Plains. The Army had other motivations. It encouraged Settlements often sprang up near forts for safety the kill-off as a way to drive Plains Indians onto and Army contract work. Many were dangerous places reservations. Comanches, Kiowas and Kiowa Apaches with desperate characters. responded with raids on settlements, wagon trains and troop movements, sometimes kidnapping individuals and stealing horses and supplies. Soldiers stationed at frontier forts launched a relentless military campaign, the Red River War of 1874–75, which eventually forced Experience the region’s dramatic the state’s last free Native Americans onto reservations in present-day Oklahoma. past through historic sites, museums and courthouses — as well as historic downtowns offering unique shopping, dining and entertainment. ★★ ★★ ★★ ★★ ★★ ★★ ★★ 2 The westward push of settlements also relocated During World War II, the vast land proved perfect cattle drives bound for railheads in Kansas and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civilian Conservation Corps and the National Park Service, 1933-1942: an Administrative History. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 266 012 SE 046 389 AUTHOR Paige, John C. TITLE The Civilian Conservation Corps and the National Park Service, 1933-1942: An Administrative History. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept. of Interior), Washington, D.C. REPORT NO NPS-D-189 PUB DATE 85 NOTE 293p.; Photographs may not reproduce well. PUB TYPE Reports - Descriptive (141) -- Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC12 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Conservation (Environment); Employment Programs; *Environmental Education; *Federal Programs; Forestry; Natural Resources; Parks; *Physical Environment; *Resident Camp Programs; Soil Conservation IDENTIFIERS *Civilian Conservation Corps; Environmental Management; *National Park Service ABSTRACT The Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) has been credited as one of Franklin D. Roosevelt's most successful effortsto conserve both the natural and human resources of the nation. This publication provides a review of the program and its impacton resource conservation, environmental management, and education. Chapters give accounts of: (1) the history of the CCC (tracing its origins, establishment, and termination); (2) the National Park Service role (explaining national and state parkprograms and co-operative planning elements); (3) National Park Servicecamps (describing programs and personnel training and education); (4) contributions of the CCC (identifying the major benefits ofthe program in the areas of resource conservation, park and recreational development, and natural and archaeological history finds); and (5) overall
    [Show full text]
  • Scuba Diving Is Swimming Underwater While There Are Many Places to Enjoy Scuba Diving in Using Scuba Equipment
    Clubs and Associations ® DIVING Life’s better outside . FETY DAN (Divers Alert Network) SA RULES • Don’t dive alone. www.diversalertnetwork.org UTDO Be A Diver O O • Don’t hold your breath. R www.beadiver.com • Don’t ascend faster than your smallest The following associations provide scuba instructor Scuba exhaled bubbles. training. Instructors certified by these programs provide scuba training to individuals for their basic • Don’t stay down too long. and advanced certifications. Diving • Don’t dive too deep. NAUI IN TEXAS (National Association of Underwater Instructors) • Don’t dive with malfunctioning equipment. www.naui.org PADI • Don’t destroy the environment. (Professional Association of Diving Instructors) www.padi.com • Don’t plan a decompression dive as a SSI (Scuba Schools International) recreational scuba diver. www.divessi.com • Don’t go in overhead environments. Contact your local dive stores for more information about these associations. • Don’t dive beyond your training. • Don’t forget your safety stop. • Don’t forget to log your dives. Be a volunteer Aquarena Center www.aquarena.txstate.edu Moody Gardens www.moodygardens.com Sea Center Texas www.tpwd.state.tx.us/seacenter/ 4200 Smith School Road Austin, Texas 78744 Texas Freshwater Fisheries Center www.tpwd.state.tx.us/tffc/ In accordance with Texas State Depository Law, this publication is available at the Texas State Publications Clearinghouse and/or Texas Depository Libraries. NOTE: Presentation of information within this brochure does not © 2010 TPWD PWD BR V3400-1161 (2/10) Printed on recycled paper. in any way constitute an endorsement by TPWD. Lake Sam Rayburn Lufkin What is scuba? Where to go www.swf-wc.usace.army.mil/samray Lake Travis Austin Scuba diving is swimming underwater while There are many places to enjoy scuba diving in www.lcra.org using scuba equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile
    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
    [Show full text]
  • GOOSE ISLAND STATE PARK STATE ISLAND GOOSE Concession Building
    PARKS TO VIEW CCC WORK Born out of the Great Depression, the Civilian Conservation Corps put young men to work in the 1930s. The jobs involved building parks and conserving natural resources across the country. Many of our state parks here in Texas display the CCC’s handiwork. Texas now has 29 CCC state parks. Some, like Garner and Palo Duro Canyon, are well known to travelers across the state. So here’s a list of some CCC parks you may not have visited … yet. By Dale Blasingame � PHOTO BY EARL NOTTINGHAM / TPWD PHOTO © LAURENCEPHOTO PARENT ABILENE STATE PARK PARKS TO VIEW CCC WORK Map and directions CCC enrollees used native limestone and 150 Park Road 32 red sandstone to build many of the park’s Tuscola, TX 79562 features, including the arched concession building (with observation tower) and the Latitude: 32.240731 water tower. The CCC also constructed the Longitude: -99.879139 swimming pool, with pyramidal poolside pergolas. Online reservations (325) 572-3204 Entrance Fees Adult Day Use: $5 Daily Child 12 and Under: Free Visit park website PHOTO BY TPWD BY PHOTO BONHAM STATE PARK PARKS TO VIEW CCC WORK Map and directions The CCC touch can be seen everywhere – 1363 State Park 24 from the earthen dam used to form the Bonham, TX 75418 65-acre lake to the boathouse and park headquarters. Visit the CCC-constructed Latitude: 33.546727 picnic area first, which houses my favorite Longitude: -96.144758 footbridge in all of Texas. Online reservations (903) 583-5022 Entrance Fees Adult Day Use: $4 Daily Child 12 and Under: Free Visit park website PHOTO BY CHASE FOUNTAIN / TPWD CHASE BY PHOTO FOUNTAIN � MORE � DAVIS MOUNTAINS STATE PARK PARKS TO VIEW CCC WORK Map and directions Indian Lodge, the pueblo-style hotel in PO Box 1707 Davis Mountains State Park, reflects the Fort Davis, TX 79734 history and culture of the region.
    [Show full text]