Evolution of the Computational Pharmaceutics Approaches in the Modeling and Prediction of Drug Payload in Lipid and Polymeric Nanocarriers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evolution of the Computational Pharmaceutics Approaches in the Modeling and Prediction of Drug Payload in Lipid and Polymeric Nanocarriers pharmaceuticals Review Evolution of the Computational Pharmaceutics Approaches in the Modeling and Prediction of Drug Payload in Lipid and Polymeric Nanocarriers Shaymaa A. Abd-algaleel 1, Hend M. Abdel-Bar 2 , Abdelkader A. Metwally 3,4 and Rania M. Hathout 3,* 1 Department of Pharmaceutics, Egyptian Drug Authority, Cairo 12618, Egypt; [email protected] 2 Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sadat City, Sadat 32897, Egypt; [email protected] 3 Department of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt; [email protected] 4 Health Sciences Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait 13110, Kuwait * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This review describes different trials to model and predict drug payload in lipid and polymeric nanocarriers. It traces the evolution of the field from the earliest attempts when numerous solubility and Flory-Huggins models were applied, to the emergence of molecular dynamic simula- tions and docking studies, until the exciting practically successful era of artificial intelligence and machine learning. Going through matching and poorly matching studies with the wet lab-dry lab results, many key aspects were reviewed and addressed in the form of sequential examples that Citation: Abd-algaleel, S.A.; highlighted both cases. Abdel-Bar, H.M.; Metwally, A.A.; Hathout, R.M. Evolution of the Computational Pharmaceutics Keywords: lipid; polymer; simulations; docking; machine learning; in-silico Approaches in the Modeling and Prediction of Drug Payload in Lipid and Polymeric Nanocarriers. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 645. https:// 1. Introduction doi.org/10.3390/ph14070645 Nowadays, many efforts are exerted in the pharmaceutical field regarding the devel- opment of different types of drug delivery systems (DDS). This aims to keep the therapeutic Academic Editor: Dimitris Tsiourvas efficacy of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), and successfully deliver the proper dose to the physiological target site. Among different types of existing DDS, nanocarriers Received: 31 May 2021 have gained great interest due to their ultra-small size that controls the pharmacokinetics Accepted: 29 June 2021 and pharmacodynamics of the drug [1,2]. Nanocarriers made specifically of lipids and Published: 5 July 2021 polymers are extensively investigated in the literature, and the number of papers deal- ing with them is dramatically increasing over time [3–6]. A core feature for a successful Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral lipid/polymeric formulation is the capacity of the carrier to retain its cargo, i.e., the drug with regard to jurisdictional claims in payload [7–9]. Selecting the optimum carrier for this purpose is an issue of time, cost published maps and institutional affil- and effort if the design is solely built on the basis of wet-lab methods. In silico pharma- iations. ceutical formulation design now constitutes a key part of contemporary drug delivery research. It is gaining popularity because it offers the experimentalists a highly pixilated picture of their target based on molecular details of both the drug and the carrier. With this knowledge, designing nanocarriers with optimized properties is much faster with Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. minimal laboratory effort and cost concerns. The scope of the current review is to illustrate Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. the different reported techniques to model and predict he drug payload in the lipid and This article is an open access article the polymeric nanocarriers. Evaluation of the consistency of these models with respect to distributed under the terms and their experimental validation results is another perspective. Given the diversity of APIs conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// and the heterogeneity of lipids and polymeris that are used in nanocarriers preparation, creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ many modelling techniques are described in literature to explain the complex relationship 4.0/). of drug-carrier systems. Some groups emphasized the use of the Flory-Huggins theory Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 645. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14070645 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/pharmaceuticals Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 25 Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 645 of drug-carrier systems. Some groups emphasized the use of the Flory-Huggins2 of 29 theory and the different solubility models for drug loading prediction. Similarly, increased un- derstanding of the drug-carrier interaction process began reaching its full potential upon reviewsand the discussing different solubility molecular models dynamics for drug simulations loading prediction. and docking Similarly, applications increased in un- this area. Furthermore,derstanding of recent the drug-carrier related research interaction reports process that began deal reachingwith larger its full number potential of uponparameters tendreviews to apply discussing novel molecular concepts dynamics of prediction simulations such andas the docking smart applications artificial intelligence-based in this area. Furthermore, recent related research reports that deal with larger number of parameters models. Thereby, the aim of this review is to cover all these techniques from naïve primi- tend to apply novel concepts of prediction such as the smart artificial intelligence-based tivemodels. approaches Thereby, to the the aim most of this innovative review is to on coveres. allThe these investigated techniques fromstudies naïve include primitive the poly- mericapproaches and the to lipid the most nanocarriers innovative along ones. Thewith investigated hybrids of studies them. includeEach section the polymeric of the review addressesand the lipid one nanocarriersmodelling area along from with the hybrids perspect of them.ive of Eachits implications section of the for review DL prediction, ad- todresses the scientific one modelling and technical area from challenges the perspective associated of its implications with its development. for DL prediction, Important to the liter- aturescientific examples and technical demonstrating challenges these associated aspects with are its highlighted. development. Such Important a work, literature appeals to re- searchersexamples who demonstrating are interested these aspectsin the areintervention highlighted. between Such a work, computer appeals and to researchersformulation sci- encewho to are reach interested state-of-the-art in the intervention solutions between for DL computer in lipid and and formulation polymeric sciencenanocarriers. to reach state-of-the-art solutions for DL in lipid and polymeric nanocarriers. Along with the review, the reader can find brief definitions and explanations of the Along with the review, the reader can find brief definitions and explanations of the mentionedmentioned tools. tools. Furthermore, some some hints hints are ar providede provided that that may may help futurehelp future tuning tuning of of techniquetechnique selection selection.. FigureFigure1 depicts1 depicts the the scope scope of this of this review. review. FigureFigure 1. 1. ContributionContribution ofof different different analytical analytical and and in silicoin silico tools tools to the to drug the loadingdrug loading optimization optimization in in differentdifferent classes classes of nanocarriers.nanocarriers. 2. Solubility Parameters and Flory-Huggins Theory 2. SolubilityThe essence Parameters of DL optimization and Flory-Huggins is to predict molecules’ Theory preferences in excipients depend- ing onThe their essence physicochemical of DL optimization properties [is10 to,11 predict]. These aremolecules’ empirical preferences mathematical in equations excipients de- pendingparameterized on their to wrapphysicochemi the physicalcal details properties and some [10,11]. structural These integration are empirical of the involved mathematical equationsmolecules parameterized [11]. The most frequentlyto wrap the noticed physical one is details the Flory-Huggins and some structural theory (FH). integration It is a of thethermodynamic involved molecules model first [11]. introduced The most in frequently the world ofnoticed polymers one to is explain the Flory-Huggins their behavior theory in solutions [12], and this is well documented in polymers literature [13–15]. Recently, this (FH). It is a thermodynamic model first introduced in the world of polymers to explain technique was used to extract valuable information regarding the plausible loading of many theirdrugs behavior in polymeric in solutions [16–19] and [12], even and lipid this [20 is]—carriers well documented via predicting in theirpolymers mutual literature solubil- [13– 15].ity/miscibility. Recently, this It is technique well known was that used one to of extract the most valuable important information factors that determineregarding the the plau- sibleloading loading capacity of many of a carrier drugs is thein solubilitypolymeric of the[16–19] drug and in this even carrier lipid [10 ,[20]—carriers21,22]. Thus, this via pre- dictingmodel their depends mutual on estimating solubility/miscibility. specific solubility It is parameters well known (SP), that usually one of Hildebrand the most andimportant factorsHansen that SP, todetermine calculate thethe final loading FH interaction capacity parameterof a carrier (X His) asthe follows: solubility of the drug in this carrier [10,21,22].
Recommended publications
  • MODELLER 10.1 Manual
    MODELLER A Program for Protein Structure Modeling Release 10.1, r12156 Andrej Saliˇ with help from Ben Webb, M.S. Madhusudhan, Min-Yi Shen, Guangqiang Dong, Marc A. Martı-Renom, Narayanan Eswar, Frank Alber, Maya Topf, Baldomero Oliva, Andr´as Fiser, Roberto S´anchez, Bozidar Yerkovich, Azat Badretdinov, Francisco Melo, John P. Overington, and Eric Feyfant email: modeller-care AT salilab.org URL https://salilab.org/modeller/ 2021/03/12 ii Contents Copyright notice xxi Acknowledgments xxv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 What is Modeller?............................................. 1 1.2 Modeller bibliography....................................... .... 2 1.3 Obtainingandinstallingtheprogram. .................... 3 1.4 Bugreports...................................... ............ 4 1.5 Method for comparative protein structure modeling by Modeller ................... 5 1.6 Using Modeller forcomparativemodeling. ... 8 1.6.1 Preparinginputfiles . ............. 8 1.6.2 Running Modeller ......................................... 9 2 Automated comparative modeling with AutoModel 11 2.1 Simpleusage ..................................... ............ 11 2.2 Moreadvancedusage............................... .............. 12 2.2.1 Including water molecules, HETATM residues, and hydrogenatoms .............. 12 2.2.2 Changing the default optimization and refinement protocol ................... 14 2.2.3 Getting a very fast and approximate model . ................. 14 2.2.4 Building a model from multiple templates . .................. 15 2.2.5 Buildinganallhydrogenmodel
    [Show full text]
  • Istls Information Services to Life Science Internet Bioinformatics Resources Josef Maier [E-Mail: [email protected]] Last Checked August, 17Th, 2011
    IStLS Information Services to Life Science Internet Bioinformatics Resources Josef Maier [e-mail: [email protected]] Last checked August, 17th, 2011 IStLS Bioinformatics Resources http://www.istls.de/bioinfolinks.php Courses and lectures Bioinformatics - Online Courses and Tutorials http://www.bioinformatik.de/cgi-bin/browse/Catalog/Research_and_Education/Online_Courses_and_Tutorials/ EMBRACE Network of Excellence http://www.embracegrid.info/page.php EMBNet Quick Guides http://www.embnet.org/node/64 EMBNet Courses http://www.embnet.org/ Sequence Analysis with distributed Resources http://bibiserv.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/sadr/ Tutorial Protein Structures (EXPASY) SwissModel http://swissmodel.expasy.org/course/course-index.htm CMBI Courses for protein structure http://swift.cmbi.ru.nl/teach/courses/index.html 2Can Support Portal - Bioinformatics educational resource http://www.ebi.ac.uk/2can Bioconductor Workshops http://www.bioconductor.org/workshops/ CBS Bioinformatics Courses http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/courses.php The European School In Bioinformatics (Biosapiens) http://www.biosapiens.info/page.php?page=esb Institutes Centers Networks Bioinformatics Institutes Germany WSI Wilhelm-Schickard-Institut für Informatik - Universitaet Tuebingen http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/en/faculties/faculty-of-science/departments/computer-science/department.html WSI Huson - Algorithms in Bioinformatics http://www-ab.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/welcome.html WSI Prof. Zell - Computer Architecture http://www.ra.cs.uni-tuebingen.de/ WSI Kohlbacher - Div. for Simulation
    [Show full text]
  • Pyplif HIPPOS-Assisted Prediction of Molecular Determinants of Ligand Binding to Receptors
    molecules Article PyPLIF HIPPOS-Assisted Prediction of Molecular Determinants of Ligand Binding to Receptors Enade P. Istyastono 1,* , Nunung Yuniarti 2, Vivitri D. Prasasty 3 and Sudi Mungkasi 4 1 Faculty of Pharmacy, Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta 55282, Indonesia 2 Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Biotechnology, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta 12930, Indonesia; [email protected] 4 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta 55282, Indonesia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +62-274883037 Abstract: Identification of molecular determinants of receptor-ligand binding could significantly increase the quality of structure-based virtual screening protocols. In turn, drug design process, especially the fragment-based approaches, could benefit from the knowledge. Retrospective virtual screening campaigns by employing AutoDock Vina followed by protein-ligand interaction finger- printing (PLIF) identification by using recently published PyPLIF HIPPOS were the main techniques used here. The ligands and decoys datasets from the enhanced version of the database of useful de- coys (DUDE) targeting human G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) were employed in this research since the mutation data are available and could be used to retrospectively verify the prediction. The results show that the method presented in this article could pinpoint some retrospectively verified molecular determinants. The method is therefore suggested to be employed as a routine in drug Citation: Istyastono, E.P.; Yuniarti, design and discovery. N.; Prasasty, V.D.; Mungkasi, S. PyPLIF HIPPOS-Assisted Prediction Keywords: PyPLIF HIPPOS; AutoDock Vina; drug discovery; fragment-based; molecular determi- of Molecular Determinants of Ligand Binding to Receptors.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Babel Documentation Release 2.3.1
    Open Babel Documentation Release 2.3.1 Geoffrey R Hutchison Chris Morley Craig James Chris Swain Hans De Winter Tim Vandermeersch Noel M O’Boyle (Ed.) December 05, 2011 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Goals of the Open Babel project ..................................... 3 1.2 Frequently Asked Questions ....................................... 4 1.3 Thanks .................................................. 7 2 Install Open Babel 9 2.1 Install a binary package ......................................... 9 2.2 Compiling Open Babel .......................................... 9 3 obabel and babel - Convert, Filter and Manipulate Chemical Data 17 3.1 Synopsis ................................................. 17 3.2 Options .................................................. 17 3.3 Examples ................................................. 19 3.4 Differences between babel and obabel .................................. 21 3.5 Format Options .............................................. 22 3.6 Append property values to the title .................................... 22 3.7 Filtering molecules from a multimolecule file .............................. 22 3.8 Substructure and similarity searching .................................. 25 3.9 Sorting molecules ............................................ 25 3.10 Remove duplicate molecules ....................................... 25 3.11 Aliases for chemical groups ....................................... 26 4 The Open Babel GUI 29 4.1 Basic operation .............................................. 29 4.2 Options .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GROMACS: Fast, Flexible, and Free
    GROMACS: Fast, Flexible, and Free DAVID VAN DER SPOEL,1 ERIK LINDAHL,2 BERK HESS,3 GERRIT GROENHOF,4 ALAN E. MARK,4 HERMAN J. C. BERENDSEN4 1Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, Box 596, S-75124 Uppsala, Sweden 2Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, SCFAB, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden 3Max-Planck Institut fu¨r Polymerforschung, Ackermannweg 10, D-55128 Mainz, Germany 4Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, NL-9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands Received 12 February 2005; Accepted 18 March 2005 DOI 10.1002/jcc.20291 Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). Abstract: This article describes the software suite GROMACS (Groningen MAchine for Chemical Simulation) that was developed at the University of Groningen, The Netherlands, in the early 1990s. The software, written in ANSI C, originates from a parallel hardware project, and is well suited for parallelization on processor clusters. By careful optimization of neighbor searching and of inner loop performance, GROMACS is a very fast program for molecular dynamics simulation. It does not have a force field of its own, but is compatible with GROMOS, OPLS, AMBER, and ENCAD force fields. In addition, it can handle polarizable shell models and flexible constraints. The program is versatile, as force routines can be added by the user, tabulated functions can be specified, and analyses can be easily customized. Nonequilibrium dynamics and free energy determinations are incorporated. Interfaces with popular quantum-chemical packages (MOPAC, GAMES-UK, GAUSSIAN) are provided to perform mixed MM/QM simula- tions. The package includes about 100 utility and analysis programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Data, Open Source, and Open Standards in Chemistry: the Blue Obelisk Five Years On" Journal of Cheminformatics Vol
    Oral Roberts University Digital Showcase College of Science and Engineering Faculty College of Science and Engineering Research and Scholarship 10-14-2011 Open Data, Open Source, and Open Standards in Chemistry: The lueB Obelisk five years on Andrew Lang Noel M. O'Boyle Rajarshi Guha National Institutes of Health Egon Willighagen Maastricht University Samuel Adams See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalshowcase.oru.edu/cose_pub Part of the Chemistry Commons Recommended Citation Andrew Lang, Noel M O'Boyle, Rajarshi Guha, Egon Willighagen, et al.. "Open Data, Open Source, and Open Standards in Chemistry: The Blue Obelisk five years on" Journal of Cheminformatics Vol. 3 Iss. 37 (2011) Available at: http://works.bepress.com/andrew-sid-lang/ 19/ This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Science and Engineering at Digital Showcase. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Science and Engineering Faculty Research and Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Digital Showcase. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Andrew Lang, Noel M. O'Boyle, Rajarshi Guha, Egon Willighagen, Samuel Adams, Jonathan Alvarsson, Jean- Claude Bradley, Igor Filippov, Robert M. Hanson, Marcus D. Hanwell, Geoffrey R. Hutchison, Craig A. James, Nina Jeliazkova, Karol M. Langner, David C. Lonie, Daniel M. Lowe, Jerome Pansanel, Dmitry Pavlov, Ola Spjuth, Christoph Steinbeck, Adam L. Tenderholt, Kevin J. Theisen, and Peter Murray-Rust This article is available at Digital Showcase: http://digitalshowcase.oru.edu/cose_pub/34 Oral Roberts University From the SelectedWorks of Andrew Lang October 14, 2011 Open Data, Open Source, and Open Standards in Chemistry: The Blue Obelisk five years on Andrew Lang Noel M O'Boyle Rajarshi Guha, National Institutes of Health Egon Willighagen, Maastricht University Samuel Adams, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Structure Input on the Web Peter Ertl
    Ertl Journal of Cheminformatics 2010, 2:1 http://www.jcheminf.com/content/2/1/1 REVIEW Open Access Molecular structure input on the web Peter Ertl Abstract A molecule editor, that is program for input and editing of molecules, is an indispensable part of every cheminfor- matics or molecular processing system. This review focuses on a special type of molecule editors, namely those that are used for molecule structure input on the web. Scientific computing is now moving more and more in the direction of web services and cloud computing, with servers scattered all around the Internet. Thus a web browser has become the universal scientific user interface, and a tool to edit molecules directly within the web browser is essential. The review covers a history of web-based structure input, starting with simple text entry boxes and early molecule editors based on clickable maps, before moving to the current situation dominated by Java applets. One typical example - the popular JME Molecule Editor - will be described in more detail. Modern Ajax server-side molecule editors are also presented. And finally, the possible future direction of web-based molecule editing, based on tech- nologies like JavaScript and Flash, is discussed. Introduction this trend and input of molecular structures directly A program for the input and editing of molecules is an within a web browser is therefore of utmost importance. indispensable part of every cheminformatics or molecu- In this overview a history of entering molecules into lar processing system. Such a program is known as a web applications will be covered, starting from simple molecule editor, molecular editor or structure sketcher.
    [Show full text]
  • ORGANIZATION of BIOMOLECULES in a 3-DIMENSIONAL SPACE by Sameer Sajja a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the University Of
    ORGANIZATION OF BIOMOLECULES IN A 3-DIMENSIONAL SPACE by Sameer Sajja A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of North Carolina at Charlotte in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Chemistry Charlotte 2019 Approved by: ________________________________ Dr. Kirill Afonin ________________________________ Dr. Caryn Striplin ________________________________ Dr. Joanna Krueger ________________________________ Dr. Yuri Nesmelov ii ©2019 Sameer Sajja ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii ABSTRACT SAMEER SAJJA. Organization of Biomolecules in a 3-Dimensional Space (Under the direction of DR. KIRILL A. AFONIN) The human body operates using various stimuli-responsive mechanisms, dictating biological activity via reaction to external cues. Hydrogels are networked hydrophilic polymeric materials that offer the potential to recreate aqueous environments with controlled organization of biomolecules for research purposes and potential therapeutic use. The unique, programmable structure of hydrogels exhibit similar physicochemical properties to those of living tissues while also introducing component-mediated biocompatibility. The design of stimuli-responsive biocompatible hydrogels would further allow for controllable mechanical and functional properties tuned by changes in environmental factors. This study investigates individual biomolecular components needed to potentially engineer biocompatible and stimuli-responsive hydrogels. By utilizing programmable biomolecules such as nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) and proteins
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Drug Discovery and Pharmaceutical Development
    processes Review Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Drug Discovery and Pharmaceutical Development Outi M. H. Salo-Ahen 1,2,* , Ida Alanko 1,2, Rajendra Bhadane 1,2 , Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin 3,* , Rodrigo Vargas Honorato 3, Shakhawath Hossain 4 , André H. Juffer 5 , Aleksei Kabedev 4, Maija Lahtela-Kakkonen 6, Anders Støttrup Larsen 7, Eveline Lescrinier 8 , Parthiban Marimuthu 1,2 , Muhammad Usman Mirza 8 , Ghulam Mustafa 9, Ariane Nunes-Alves 10,11,* , Tatu Pantsar 6,12, Atefeh Saadabadi 1,2 , Kalaimathy Singaravelu 13 and Michiel Vanmeert 8 1 Pharmaceutical Sciences Laboratory (Pharmacy), Åbo Akademi University, Tykistökatu 6 A, Biocity, FI-20520 Turku, Finland; ida.alanko@abo.fi (I.A.); rajendra.bhadane@abo.fi (R.B.); parthiban.marimuthu@abo.fi (P.M.); atefeh.saadabadi@abo.fi (A.S.) 2 Structural Bioinformatics Laboratory (Biochemistry), Åbo Akademi University, Tykistökatu 6 A, Biocity, FI-20520 Turku, Finland 3 Faculty of Science-Chemistry, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands; [email protected] 4 Swedish Drug Delivery Forum (SDDF), Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala Biomedical Center, Uppsala University, 751 23 Uppsala, Sweden; [email protected] (S.H.); [email protected] (A.K.) 5 Biocenter Oulu & Faculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Oulu, Aapistie 7 A, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland; andre.juffer@oulu.fi 6 School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, FI-70210 Kuopio, Finland; maija.lahtela-kakkonen@uef.fi (M.L.-K.); tatu.pantsar@uef.fi
    [Show full text]
  • Ee9e60701e814784783a672a9
    International Journal of Technology (2017) 4: 611‐621 ISSN 2086‐9614 © IJTech 2017 A PRELIMINARY STUDY ON SHIFTING FROM VIRTUAL MACHINE TO DOCKER CONTAINER FOR INSILICO DRUG DISCOVERY IN THE CLOUD Agung Putra Pasaribu1, Muhammad Fajar Siddiq1, Muhammad Irfan Fadhila1, Muhammad H. Hilman1, Arry Yanuar2, Heru Suhartanto1* 1Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia 2Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia (Received: January 2017 / Revised: April 2017 / Accepted: June 2017) ABSTRACT The rapid growth of information technology and internet access has moved many offline activities online. Cloud computing is an easy and inexpensive solution, as supported by virtualization servers that allow easier access to personal computing resources. Unfortunately, current virtualization technology has some major disadvantages that can lead to suboptimal server performance. As a result, some companies have begun to move from virtual machines to containers. While containers are not new technology, their use has increased recently due to the Docker container platform product. Docker’s features can provide easier solutions. In this work, insilico drug discovery applications from molecular modelling to virtual screening were tested to run in Docker. The results are very promising, as Docker beat the virtual machine in most tests and reduced the performance gap that exists when using a virtual machine (VirtualBox). The virtual machine placed third in test performance, after the host itself and Docker. Keywords: Cloud computing; Docker container; Molecular modeling; Virtual screening 1. INTRODUCTION In recent years, cloud computing has entered the realm of information technology (IT) and has been widely used by the enterprise in support of business activities (Foundation, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Protein-Ligand Docking Methods on Peptide-Ligand
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/212514; this version posted November 1, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Evaluation of protein-ligand docking methods on peptide-ligand complexes for docking small ligands to peptides Sandeep Singh1#, Hemant Kumar Srivastava1#, Gaurav Kishor1#, Harinder Singh1, Piyush Agrawal1 and G.P.S. Raghava1,2* 1CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39A, Chandigarh, India. 2Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Okhla Phase III, Delhi India #Authors Contributed Equally Emails of Authors: SS: [email protected] HKS: [email protected] GK: [email protected] HS: [email protected] PA: [email protected] * Corresponding author Professor of Center for Computation Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology (IIIT Delhi), Okhla Phase III, New Delhi-110020, India Phone: +91-172-26907444 Fax: +91-172-26907410 E-mail: [email protected] Running Title: Benchmarking of docking methods 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/212514; this version posted November 1, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. ABSTRACT In the past, many benchmarking studies have been performed on protein-protein and protein-ligand docking however there is no study on peptide-ligand docking.
    [Show full text]
  • Parameterizing a Novel Residue
    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Luthey-Schulten Group, Department of Chemistry Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group Computational Biophysics Workshop Parameterizing a Novel Residue Rommie Amaro Brijeet Dhaliwal Zaida Luthey-Schulten Current Editors: Christopher Mayne Po-Chao Wen February 2012 CONTENTS 2 Contents 1 Biological Background and Chemical Mechanism 4 2 HisH System Setup 7 3 Testing out your new residue 9 4 The CHARMM Force Field 12 5 Developing Topology and Parameter Files 13 5.1 An Introduction to a CHARMM Topology File . 13 5.2 An Introduction to a CHARMM Parameter File . 16 5.3 Assigning Initial Values for Unknown Parameters . 18 5.4 A Closer Look at Dihedral Parameters . 18 6 Parameter generation using SPARTAN (Optional) 20 7 Minimization with new parameters 32 CONTENTS 3 Introduction Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are a powerful scientific tool used to study a wide variety of systems in atomic detail. From a standard protein simulation, to the use of steered molecular dynamics (SMD), to modelling DNA-protein interactions, there are many useful applications. With the advent of massively parallel simulation programs such as NAMD2, the limits of computational anal- ysis are being pushed even further. Inevitably there comes a time in any molecular modelling scientist’s career when the need to simulate an entirely new molecule or ligand arises. The tech- nique of determining new force field parameters to describe these novel system components therefore becomes an invaluable skill. Determining the correct sys- tem parameters to use in conjunction with the chosen force field is only one important aspect of the process.
    [Show full text]