Brussels, 18 September 2012

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Brussels, 18 September 2012 Secretariat of the Committee on Budgetary Control Brussels, 22 November 2013 Budgetary Control Committee Delegation to Kaliningrad in the context of economic and financial impact for the Union by having a Russian enclave within the Union's border 8-9 July 2013 Feedback note In the Chair: Mr Jan MULDER (ALDE, Netherlands) EP Participating Members: Ms Ingeborg GRAESSLE (EPP, Germany), Ms Zuzana BRZOBOHATA (S&D, Czech Rep.), Ms Edit HERCZOG (S&D, Hungary), Mr Soren Bo SONDERGAARD (GUE/NGL, Denmark), Mr Boguslaw SONIK (EPP, Poland), Mr Joachim ZELLER (EPP, Germany) The final programme is to be found in Annex I. A question for oral answer with debate in Plenary sent to the European Commission on Cigarette production and smuggling in the Kaliningrad region is to be found as Annex II. 1 1. The aim of the visit of the CONT Delegation was to verify how the spending of EU funds on various projects in the region of Kaliningrad is done as well as to check the illegal flow of goods - mainly illicit trade of cigarettes and petrol products - into the EU from the region, which harms the income of the EU budget. 2. It aimed also to check how the customs control systems procedures are implemented in the EU external Polish-Russian border crossing point of Grzechotki-Momonowo. Fight against fraud and the protection of the Union's financial interests in general were also on the scope of the delegation. 3. Following intensive exchanges the delegation was invited by the regional authorities of Kaliningrad oblast as the Russian Parliament didn’t show interest in issuing an invitation to the Committee delegation. 4. On 8 July am the Delegation visited the Polish-Russian border crossing in Mamonovo II - Grzechotki, which has been built thanks to EU funds (13.3 million EUR under the TACIS CBC Programme). On both sides of the border Members held meetings with respectively the Russian and Polish customs authorities. 5. Mamonowo-Grzechotki is the main border crossing between the two countries and since its opening in 2010 the waiting time on the Pl-Ru border has been significantly shortened and the quality of services improved. Thanks to the modern equipment installed controlling all the freight entering into the EU, illegal goods are now less prone to entering through this border crossing. It seems that they are however shipped into the EU via other means. 6. The Delegation met also with representatives of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex) and discussed the safety of the eastern borders of the EU as well as the specificity of each one of them (from Finnish-Russian to Romanian-Moldovan border). 7. On 8 July pm the delegation held meetings with the regional authorities of Kaliningrad oblast. The delegation encountered the Governor Nikolai N. Tsukanov as well as several other ministers of the Kaliningrad Government. The Members highlighted the problem of tobacco smuggling from the region and urged for a rapid intervention of the Russian authorities. 8. After the meeting a press conference was held which was highly attended by regional and local media as well as by some representatives of national Russian media. The issue of tobacco smuggling was raised as well and it was reflected in the press articles the following day. 9. Accordingly with public available sources that estimate that the cross-border cigarette smuggling from Kaliningrad to the European Union (particularly to Lithuania and Poland) is an illegal industry worth an approximate 1 billion US dollars1 CONT decided to send a delegation to Kaliningrad. The Committee paid therefore particular attention to the fight against cigarette smuggling and other forms of illicit trade of tobacco products at this external border of the European Union. 1 http://www.publicintegrity.org/2008/10/20/6353/made-be-smuggled 2 10. Analysis by FRONTEX confirms that cigarette smuggling is one of the main problems affecting the EU Eastern border, and suggests a significant scale of smuggling from the Western Balkan countries. It also suggests that cigarette smuggling significantly affects the work of order authorities on the Eastern land borders, including on the land borders with Turkey, and with Western Balkan countries2. 11. The second day of the visit focused on EU funded projects. The delegation visited a Long Term Control Plan and Drug Treatment Hospital in Kaliningrad, which obtained funds to develop services to contain the spread of HIV and Tuberculosis among injecting drug users in Kaliningrad oblast (331 thousand EUR under the TACIS program). This ongoing project is a successful one and the hospital authorities have already declared that they will attempt to continue funding the project once the EU funding has ended. 12. The Delegation visited the town of Zelenogradsk on the Baltic coast, where one of the pumping stations of the project of Waste Water Management in Small Towns of Kaliningrad Oblast has been located (9.5 million EUR from the EU funds via the Nordic Environment Finance Corporation (NEFCO)). This project is a part of a series of ambitious projects of the EU aiming at improving the quality of water in the Baltic Sea. Despite long efforts of the Commission (lasting already 17 years), the water sanitation projects in Kaliningrad are unfortunately still not functioning. 13. The third visited project was the cross-border bicycle trail between Lithuania and Russia along the old post road on Curonian Spit EUROVELO-BALTICA in the Curonian National Park (225 thousand EUR under TACIS program). The Russian bicycle trail project has been rejected by the Russian Ministry of Environment and only the Lithuanian side of the route has been created. Members insisted that the National Park Authorities should guarantee that the project is completed in the Russian side as well. 14. This delegation follows up the 2012 delegation of the Budgetary Control Committee to Rotterdam and Antwerp, on customs control systems at the EU external borders and fight against fraud and illegitimate (smuggled and counterfeit) cigarettes and the hearing organised by the Committee on 17 September 2012 concerning "How to improve the capacity of the future Hercules III programme to promote activities in the field of the protection of the EU's financial interests?" 15. Recalls that in 2011 the amounts of cigarettes seized were 141.000.000 in Antwerp and 81.900.000 in Rotterdam harbours, further recalls that according to the figures provided by "The Dutch Cigarette Manufacturers Association" the illegitimate (smuggled and counterfeit) cigarettes consumption has been increasing year over year and therefore the EU (and Members States) financial interests are being damaged; 16. The Head of Section of the EU-Russia Cooperation Programme and the Head of Finance and Contracts Section of the EU Delegation in Moscow assisted in the delegation. 2 Stepping up the fight against cigarette smuggling and other forms of illicit trade in tobacco products - A comprehensive EU Strategy - COM(2013) 324 final 3 CONT delegation observations and recommendations: 17. Insists that insufficient control at the EU external borders represents a significant decrease of the traditional own resources funding to the revenues for the European budget and therefore deserve from the political authorities greater attention; 18. Underlines that the Treaty states that the Union and the Member States share responsibility for protecting the Union's financial interests and fighting fraud and the Commission should exercise overall oversight, set standards and verify compliance; calls for close cooperation between the Commission and the Member States in order to protect the Union's financial interest effectively; 19. Regrets that annual losses of revenue in the European Union can be estimated, on the basis of seizures of cigarettes notified by the Member States, at about EUR 10 billion per year, of which about 10 % (i.e. 1 billion EUR) would be revenue to the European Union Budget and that it is estimated that 65% of the seized cigarettes are counterfeit3; based on these information the damage of counterfeit to the Union Budget can be estimated at around EUR 650 million per year, the damage due to contraband at around EUR 350 million per year; 20. Notes that accordingly with Frontex-coordinated Joint Operation Focal Points Land 2010 and 2011 the common borders are one of the most important entry points for smuggled cigarettes to the EU, followed by the Eastern Balkans (border with Turkey) and the Western Balkans; 21. Deplores that accordingly with public available sources the estimated cross border cigarette smuggling from Kaliningrad to the European Union (particularly to Lithuania and Poland) is an illegal industry worth an approximate 1 billion US dollars; 22. Notes that Western European countries are destination markets for both cigarettes smuggled from third countries to Member States but also those illegally produced on the territory of the EU and that in the case of Poland and Lithuania, an estimated 60–70% of all smuggled cigarettes are sold there while the rest are smuggled to other European countries; 23. Notes that the expanding flow of illicit goods is caused predominately by price differentials between the two sides of the common borders for a wide range of products, in particular excise goods; further notes that tobacco smuggling continues to be lucrative due to price differences between the EU and third countries and that the main destination countries for smuggled
Recommended publications
  • Zelenogradsk Child Daycare Centre Is Located Here
    Promenade (15) The first sea promenade of Cranz was constructed after World War I. It was wooden and 900 meter long. Then the promenade was reconstructed several times. Wooden structures were changed into more secure concrete ones. Today the promenade is being completely reconstructed. It is tiled. Hotel «Baltic Sea» (16) The building was constructed in neoclassic style in 1885. The hotel was Regional Tourism one of the most fashionable hotels in Cranz. After World War I the Information Center Railroad Control Directorate of Bromberg (region of West Prussia) was located here. Later the building belonged to Königsberg Women’s League, 4 Prospect Mira Street, tel.: 555-200 which arranged a retirement house here. www.visit-kaliningrad.ru Antique banisters and patterned bars remained in the building. Today it is an administrative house. The local library is located on the first floor. 1 Lenina street Villa of Friedrich Bast (17) It is a typical sample of East Prussian modernist style which is noticeable Tourist route for its asymmetry. Look at the decorative ornament over the front access door: the circle and four rays symbolize the Sun. Earlier the left wing of the house belonged to rich house-owner Friedrich Bast. Dentist Pankof occupied the first floor. The right wing was occupied by a boarding house. Today Zelenogradsk child daycare centre is located here. «Zelenogradsk - Cranz» 4 Lenina street Villa of Max Krell (18) The villa of well-known Prussian lawyer Max Krell was constructed at the beginning of the 20th century according to the individual project. It is unique because of combination of Russian and Gothic styles.
    [Show full text]
  • A Captive Island Kaliningrad Between MOSCOW and the EU
    41 A CAPTIVE ISLAND KAlInIngRAD bETWEEn MOSCOW AnD ThE EU Jadwiga Rogoża, Agata Wierzbowska-Miazga, Iwona Wiśniewska NUMBER 41 WARSAW JULY 2012 A CAPTIVE ISLAND KALININGRAD BETWEEN MOSCOW AND THE EU Jadwiga Rogoża, Agata Wierzbowska-Miazga, Iwona Wiśniewska © Copyright by Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia / Centre for Eastern Studies CONTENT EDITORS Adam Eberhardt, Marek Menkiszak EDITORS Katarzyna Kazimierska, Anna Łabuszewska TRANSLATION Ilona Duchnowicz CO-OPERATION Jim Todd GRAPHIC DESIGN PARA-BUCH CHARTS, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH ON COVER Wojciech Mańkowski DTP GroupMedia PuBLISHER Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a, Warsaw, Poland Phone + 48 /22/ 525 80 00 Fax: + 48 /22/ 525 80 40 osw.waw.pl ISBN 978–83–62936–13–7 Contents KEY POINTS /5 INTRODUCTION /8 I. KALININGRAD OBLAST: A SUBJECT OR AN OBJECT OF THE F EDERATION? /9 1. THE AMBER ISLAND: Kaliningrad today /9 1.1. Kaliningrad in the legal, political and economic space of the Russian Federation /9 1.2. Current political situation /13 1.3. The current economic situation /17 1.4. The social situation /24 1.5. Characteristics of the Kaliningrad residents /27 1.6. The ecological situation /32 2. AN AREA UNDER SPECIAL SURVEILLANCE: Moscow’s policy towards the region /34 2.1. The policy of compensating for Kaliningrad’s location as an exclave /34 2.2. The policy of reinforcing social ties with the rest of Russia /43 2.3. The policy of restricted access for foreign partners to the region /45 2.4. The policy of controlling the region’s co-operation with other countries /47 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Kaliningrad Region?
    Kaliningrad region Government NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR BUISNESS DEVELOPMENT GENERAL INFORMATION MAXIMUM LENGTH NORWAY OF THE TERRITORY SWEDEN ESTONIA 108 КМ 108 LATVIA RUSSIA KALININGRAD LITHUANIA 15.1 REGION 205 КМ THS КМ² REGION IRELAND TERRITORY BELARUS ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER GERMANY POLAND 22 ENGLAND CITIES KALININGRAD >480 CHECH UKRAINE THOUSAND PEOPLE SLOVAKIA AUSTRIA MAIN CITIES FRANCE HUNGARY SOVETSK BALTIYSK SWITZERLAND ROMANIA >40K PEOPLE >36K PEOPLE CHERNYAKHOVSK GUSEV ITALY >37K PEOPLE >28K PEOPLE SVETLOGORSK >22K PEOPLE SPAIN BULGARIA PORTUGALPORRTUGALR Kaliningrad region Government GREECE POPULATION 60% WORKING-AGE POPULATION > 1 MIL PEOPLE DATED 01/08/2018 >10 THOUSAND PEOPLE PER YEAR >4.5 MIGRATION THOUSAND 5.2% GROWTH GRADUATES ANNUALLY UNEMPLOYMENT RATE >66 PEOPLE PER KM2 13 POPULATION DENSITY HIGHER EDUCATION 12TH PLACE IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION INSTITUTIONS Kaliningrad region Government ECONOMIC 524 $ 102 $ PERFORMANCE 33 536 ₶ 6 579 ₶ PER MONTH М2 PER YEAR AVERAGE SALARY RENTAL PRIСE FOR COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE 10.2 PROPERTIES BN $ 0.06 $ 400 $ 3.7 25 800 ₶ 641.58 BN ₶ kWh PER YEAR FOREIGN TRADE ELECTRICITY PRICE INTERNET PRICE TURNOVER 0.02 $ 2018 1.2 ₶ PER MIN OUTGOING CALLS 7. 2 2.08 0.74 $ 48 ₶ BN $ BN $ PER LITER 417.4 BN ₶ 130.5 BN ₶ PRICE OF GASOLINE GROSS INVESTMENTS CAPITAL REGIONAL DONE BY PRODUCT ORGANIZATIONS 2017 2018 Kaliningrad region Government SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE >129 1 BN ₶ MIL ₶ SEZ REGIME COVERS 2 BN $ 0.02 MIL $ THE WHOLE REGION SEZ REGIME IS REGULATED TOTAL AMOUNT MINIMUM BY THE REGIONAL AUTHORITIES
    [Show full text]
  • Kaliningrad Study
    Kaliningrad in Europe Kaliningrad in Europe A study commissioned by the Council of Europe Edited by Mr Bartosz Cichocki Linguistic Editing œ Mr Paul Holtom, Mrs Catherine Gheribi This study has been drafted by a group of independent experts at the initiative of the Committee of Advisers on the Development of Transfrontier Co-operation in Central and Eastern Europe, an advisory body established by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. Although every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this study, the Council of Europe takes no responsibility for factual errors or omissions. The views expressed in the study are those of the authors and do not commit the Council of Europe or any of its organs. Factual information correct at March 2003. © Council of Europe, 2003 Foreword Walter Schwimmer Secretary General of the Council of Europe Kaliningrad, the city and the Oblast, are these days receiving a lot of attention from international circles. The Russian Federation has been actively raising the awareness of European institutions about the peculiar situation of the region, separated by mainland Russia and surrounded by land by two countries, Lithuania and Poland, soon-to- become members of the European Union. The perspective of the enlargement of the European Union to the Russia‘s exclave immediate neighbours is raising fears that the isolation of the Oblast would deepen and its economic and social backwardness worsen. The Council of Europe has responded to these legitimate preoccupation by taking recently several initiatives. In 2002, the Parliamentary Assembly held a thorough debate which led to the adoption of Recommendation 1579 on the Enlargement of the European Union and the Kaliningrad Region.
    [Show full text]
  • UTLC ERA: Trans Eurasian Railway Container Operator IBS Web Talk
    TCEA22 (C) 2021 ERA UTLC UTLC ERA: Trans Eurasian railway container operator IBS Web talk Alexey Grom General Manager 10/06/2021 UTLC ERA BASE TRANSIT ROUTES Kaliningrad up close Baltiysk KCSP Dzerzhinskaya-Novaya Chernyakhovsk Vyartsilya Mamonovo Zheleznodorozhniy Buslovskaya Kaliningrad Bruzgi Svislach Brest Dostyk Izov Altynkol 5-DAY UTLC ERA SERVICES UTLC ERA organizes regular container trains through Cargo flows to/from EU Cargo flows to/from China Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan NEW GLOBAL LOGISTICS At the apex of the pandemic: air and sea • Air total cargo volumes down by >40%. • Air rates up >300%. • Up to 20% of sea sailings cancelled, total volumes down by 10-15%. • W-BOUND sea freight rates up >20%. • E-BOUND sea freight rates jumped twofold. Impact of the pandemic: rail • The “Modal Shift” phenomena – goods switching over to rail – is set to have a lasting effect on the industry, leading to us to a state of the “New Global Logistics” • "New Global Logistics" – is a paradigm shift which reflects the growing role of rail in trans-Eurasian trade • Previously, trans-Eurasian railway container transportation was expected to settle at around 3-4% of EU- China trade, but this figure already exceeded 5%, hence the status-quo is no more TREMENDOUS GROWTH OF TRANSEURASIAN TRANSIT Absolute 2019 2020 % Change Figures for UTLC ERA change Cargo volumes 333 021 546 902 213 881 64% transported, TEU Results of goods shifting over to rail: • Absolute growth of 214k TEU transported in 2020 over 2019, which amounts to 64% increase. • The total $ value of goods transported by UTLC ERA in 2020 exceeded $30 billion, accounting for 5.4% of trade between China and Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    TOWARDS A HEALTHIER BALTIC SEA – IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BALTIC SEA ACTION PLAN IN RUSSIA This report does not necessarily represent the views of HELCOM. HELCOM does not assume responsibility for the content of the report. TABLE OF CONTENTS Information included in this publication or extracts thereof are free for citation on the condition that the complete reference of the publication is given as stated above. SELECTED RECOMMENDATIONS page 4 Cover photo: Shutterstock Design: Janne Tuononen INTRODUCTION page 6 Copyright 2014 Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission HELCOM • BASE • HELCOM • Cooperation with Russia • Baltic Sea Action Plan (BSAP) BSAP: EUTROPHICATION page 12 • Agriculture • Scattered Settlements BSAP: BIODIVERSITY page 20 • Marine Protected Zone: Curonian Spit • Management Plan for Luga Salmon BSAP: HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES page 28 • Pharmaceuticals • Microplastics • Oil Terminal HOT SPOTS page 36 DATA: MONITORING page 40 DATA: INDICATORS page 50 PUBLIC AWARENESS page 54 RECOMMENDATIONS page 58 THANKS page 74 photo: OCEANA / Carlos Suárez 3 SELECTED RECOMMENDATIONS IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BALTIC SEA ACTION PLAN IN RUSSIA IN ST. PETERSBURG & • Continue the critical efforts on the LENINGRAD REGION: Vistula lagoon management plan by involving a wide range of authorities as • Support the survival of wild salmon in well as research institutions river Luga by establishing an effective management plan • Speed up the work among relevant Russian authorities across sectors for • Continue to research the pharmaceuti- developing a plan to improve the envi- cals in urban waste water treatment – with ronmental status of the Curonian lagoon current treatment practices, common pain killer residues end up in the Baltic Sea • Elaborate a monthly monitoring scheme on total nutrient concentra- • Investigate more the amount and tions of the water bodies in Kaliningrad types of microplastic litter in waste wa- region ter of St.
    [Show full text]
  • KALININGRAD REGION ABOUT the REGION REGION in RATINGS
    KALININGRAD REGION ABOUT the REGION REGION IN RATINGS 2019 2018/19 2016 2016 TOP-5 TOP-15/30 TOP-5 Best Russian cities for National rating of Best Russian cities for The first Russian travelling investment event tourism blue flag beach attractiveness 2015-2016 2013 2013 2013 TOP-5 1 PLACE 1 PLACE TOP-5 Best Russian cities for 30 Best Russian cities Best Russian cities Russian regions tourist living for business rating GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION KALININGRAD REGION: Within a 1500 km radius there are: Minsk 534 km Saint-Petersburg Moscow 1289 km Saint-Petersburg 960 km Smolensk 913 km Vilnius 390 km Riga 390 km Warsaw 400 km Stockholm 650 km Berlin 682 km Copenhagen 680 km Oslo 850 km LOGISTIC ADVANTAGES Ice-free port 22 international International Airport and border-crossing points a large cargo terminal (auto, water, railway and the airport). Around 1400 of Kaliningrad Two Pan-European enterprises with the total vehicle transport corridors fleet of around 8200 trucks are go through the region engaged in the trade between № 1: VIA HANSEATICA: Russia and the European Union. Riga - Kaliningrad - Gdansk The volume of international № 9: Minsk – Vilnius - freight traffic comprises more Kaliningrad). than 2.3 mln tons per year. The Kaliningrad Railway is the only railway in the country where the rail tracks of two standards are used: both Russian (1520 mm) and European (1435 mm) gauges. LOGISTIC ADVANTAGES (Railways) LOGISTIC ADVANTAGES (Railways) LOGISTIC ADVANTAGES (Roads) Traffic capacity by 2023 - 20,000 vehicles per day LOGISTIC ADVANTAGES (Maritime Transport) LOGISTIC ADVANTAGES (Aviation Transport) SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE SEZ residents in Kaliningrad region 230 investment projects 125 billion rubles total amount of investments announced.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Kaliningrad Region?
    Kaliningrad region Government NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR BUISNESS DEVELOPMENT GENERAL INFORMATION MAXIMUM LENGTH NORWAY OF THE TERRITORY SWEDEN ESTONIA 108 КМ 108 LATVIA RUSSIA KALININGRAD LITHUANIA 15.1 REGION 205 КМ THS КМ² REGION IRELAND TERRITORY BELARUS ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER GERMANY POLAND 22 ENGLAND CITIES KALININGRAD >480 CHECH UKRAINE THOUSAND PEOPLE SLOVAKIA AUSTRIA MAIN CITIES FRANCE HUNGARY SOVETSK BALTIYSK SWITZERLAND ROMANIA >40K PEOPLE >36K PEOPLE CHERNYAKHOVSK GUSEV ITALY >37K PEOPLE >28K PEOPLE SVETLOGORSK >22K PEOPLE SPAIN BULGARIA PORTUGALPORRTUGALR Kaliningrad region Government GREECE POPULATION 56.5% WORKING-AGE POPULATION > 1 MIL PEOPLE DATED 01/08/2018 ~13 THOUSAND PEOPLE > . PER YEAR 3 7 MIGRATION THOUSAND 4. % GROWTH GRADUATES 4 ANNUALLY UNEMPLOYMENT RATE >67 PEOPLE PER KM2 9 POPULATION DENSITY HIGHER EDUCATION 12TH PLACE IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION INSTITUTIONS Kaliningrad region Government ECONOMIC 556 $ 88 $ PERFORMANCE 39 661 ₶ 6 579 ₶ 2 PER MONTH М PER YEAR AVERAGE SALARY RENTAL PRIСE FOR COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE 10.3 PROPERTIES BN $ 0.08 $ 347 $ 5.8 25 800 ₶ BN ₶ 670 kWh PER YEAR FOREIGN TRADE ELECTRICITY PRICE INTERNET PRICE TURNOVER 0.02 $ 1.2 ₶ PER MIN OUTGOING CALLS 7.1 1.6 0.65 $ 48 ₶ BN $ BN $ PER LITER 460,9 BN ₶ BN ₶ PRICE 103 OF GASOLINE GROSS INVESTMENTS CAPITAL REGIONAL DONE BY PRODUCT ORGANIZATIONS Kaliningrad region Government SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE >128.4 1 BN ₶ MIL ₶ SEZ REGIME COVERS BN $ 0.02 MIL $ THE WHOLE REGION >1.7 SEZ REGIME IS REGULATED TOTAL AMOUNT MINIMUM BY THE REGIONAL AUTHORITIES OF DECLARED
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Railway Network Evolution on the Kaliningrad Region's Landscape Environment Romanova, Elena; Vinogradova, Olga; Kretinin, Gennady; Drobiz, Mikhail
    www.ssoar.info The effect of railway network evolution on the Kaliningrad region's landscape environment Romanova, Elena; Vinogradova, Olga; Kretinin, Gennady; Drobiz, Mikhail Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Romanova, E., Vinogradova, O., Kretinin, G., & Drobiz, M. (2015). The effect of railway network evolution on the Kaliningrad region's landscape environment. Baltic Region, 4, 137-149. https://doi.org/10.5922/2074-9848-2015-4-11 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Free Digital Peer Publishing Licence This document is made available under a Free Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-51411-4 E. Romanova, O. Vinogradova, G. Kretinin, M. Drobiz This article addresses methodology of THE EFFECT OF RAILWAY modern landscape studies from the NETWORK EVOLUTION perspective of natural and man-made components of a territory. Railway infras- ON THE KALININGRAD tructure is not only an important system- REGION’S LANDSCAPE building element of economic and settle- ENVIRONMENT ment patterns; it also affects cultural landscapes. The study of cartographic materials and historiography made it possible to identify the main stages of the * development of the Kaliningrad railway E. Romanova , network in terms of its territorial scope and O. Vinogradova*, to describe causes of the observed changes. * Historically, changes in the political, eco- G.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion on the Vistula Lagoon Regional Development Considering
    OCEANOGRAPHY No. 114,2012 Discussion on the Vistula Lagoon regional development considering local consequences of climate changes Interim report on the ECOSUPPORT BONUS+ project "Advanced modelling tool for scenarios of the Baltic Sea ECOsystem to SUPPORT decision making" and RFBR project No. 08-05-92421 Anastasia Domnina, Boris Chubarenko Atlantic Branch of P.P Shirhov Institute of Oceanology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Kaliningrad, Russia Front: Map of the municipalities around the Vistula Lagoon ISSN: 0283-7714 © SMHI OCEANOGRAPHY No 114,2012 Discussion on the Vistula Lagoon regional development considering local consequences of climate changes Interim report on the ECOSUPPORT BONUS+ project "Advanced modelling tool for scenarios of the Baltic Sea ECOsystem to SUPPORT decision making" and RFBR project No. 08-05-92421 Anastasia Domnina, Boris Chubarenko Atlantic Branch of P.P Shirhov Institute of Oceanology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Kaliningrad, Russia, [email protected], [email protected] Summary Information about natural and economic conditions in the Vistula lagoon together with directions of development of municipalities around the lagoon is presented in the report. The review of directions of development show that all municipalities aim to develop tourism, harbours and land transport. Moreover, Polish municipalities give large attention to environmental protection. In the future the development towards these strategic directions will continue together with an increased role of environmental protection and consequences of climate changes. Assessment of tolerance of Vistula Lagoon municipalities’ development strategies to climate changes have shown that directions of Polish municipalities’ development is less tolerant to consequences of climate change because of a large area disposed to possible flooding, and therefore possibly high expenses for prevention of territory flooding.
    [Show full text]
  • Königsberg–Kaliningrad, 1928-1948
    Exclave: Politics, Ideology, and Everyday Life in Königsberg–Kaliningrad, 1928-1948 By Nicole M. Eaton A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Yuri Slezkine, chair Professor John Connelly Professor Victoria Bonnell Fall 2013 Exclave: Politics, Ideology, and Everyday Life in Königsberg–Kaliningrad, 1928-1948 © 2013 By Nicole M. Eaton 1 Abstract Exclave: Politics, Ideology, and Everyday Life in Königsberg-Kaliningrad, 1928-1948 by Nicole M. Eaton Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Yuri Slezkine, Chair “Exclave: Politics, Ideology, and Everyday Life in Königsberg-Kaliningrad, 1928-1948,” looks at the history of one city in both Hitler’s Germany and Stalin’s Soviet Russia, follow- ing the transformation of Königsberg from an East Prussian city into a Nazi German city, its destruction in the war, and its postwar rebirth as the Soviet Russian city of Kaliningrad. The city is peculiar in the history of Europe as a double exclave, first separated from Germany by the Polish Corridor, later separated from the mainland of Soviet Russia. The dissertation analyzes the ways in which each regime tried to transform the city and its inhabitants, fo- cusing on Nazi and Soviet attempts to reconfigure urban space (the physical and symbolic landscape of the city, its public areas, markets, streets, and buildings); refashion the body (through work, leisure, nutrition, and healthcare); and reconstitute the mind (through vari- ous forms of education and propaganda). Between these two urban revolutions, it tells the story of the violent encounter between them in the spring of 1945: one of the largest offen- sives of the Second World War, one of the greatest civilian exoduses in human history, and one of the most violent encounters between the Soviet army and a civilian population.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Territories Through the Construction of Sports Facilities
    E3S Web of Conferences 208, 08008 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020808008 IFT 2020 Development of territories through the construction of sports facilities Lidya Shershova*, Elena Golovina, Yulia Gurenko, and Olga Tomashevskaya Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, 14 Nevskiy St, 236016 Kaliningrad, Russian Federation Abstract. The approach to the development of territories through the construction of sports facilities on the example of the city of Kaliningrad (Northwestern Federal District, Russia) is considered. The results of the implementation of state target programs for the formation of the urban environment are analysed. These programs provide the opportunity to engage in physical education and sports on equipped sports grounds. The results of monitoring the use of sports facilities for physical culture and sports in the city of Kaliningrad are presented. The conditions for increasing the volume of physical activity of young people through the system of attracting them to systematic physical culture and sports on doorstep sports grounds have been determined. 1 Introduction Today, in many regions of Russia, special attention is paid to the sustainable development of territories through the provision of a comfortable and favorable environment for life [1]. Special attention is paid to the promotion of physical culture and sports activities through the popularization of a healthy lifestyle. The development of mass sports activities opens up new horizons for adjusting territorial development plans. Physical activity is an essential element of a healthy lifestyle, has a beneficial effect not only on the harmonious development of a person's personality, but also on his functional capabilities, increases physical and mental performance, strengthens health and prevents diseases [2].
    [Show full text]