CALIFORNIA Mount Shasta

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CALIFORNIA Mount Shasta OREGON Tulelake th Lower Goose 5 Klamath Lake Clear Lake Lake 116 Congress of the United States Crescent City Tule Lake Reservoir Sump DEL Yreka NORTE SISKIYOU MODOC Alturas Weed CALIFORNIA Mount Shasta Arcata Shasta Burney Lake Eureka Weaverville HUMBOLDT SHASTA LASSEN Fortuna TRINITY Shasta Lake 1 UTAH Eagle Redding Lake Susanville Lake Red Bluff Almanor TEHAMA PLUMAS East Quincy American Indian Reservations and Off-Reservation Trust Lands (ORTL) in California 2 Congressional Congressional Congressional Chico Paradise Name District Name District Name District Agua Caliente Indian Reservation and ORTL 36 Greenville Rancheria 1 Resighini Rancheria 2 Alturas Indian Rancheria 1 Grindstone Indian Rancheria 3 Rincon Reservation 50 BUTTE Auburn Rancheria and ORTL 1,4 Guidiville Rancheria and ORTL 2 Roaring Creek Rancheria 1 GLENN Augustine Reservation 36 Hoopa Valley Reservation 2 Robinson Rancheria and ORTL 3,5 SIERRA Barona Reservation 50 Hopland Rancheria and ORTL 2 Rohnerville Rancheria 2 Fort Bragg Oroville Benton Paiute Reservation and ORTL 8 Inaja and Cosmit Reservation 50 Round Valley Reservation and ORTL 2 Willits Berry Creek Rancheria and ORTL 1 Jackson Rancheria 4 Rumsey Indian Rancheria 3 MENDOCINO Big Bend Rancheria 1 Jamul Indian Village 50 San Manuel Reservation 8,31 NEVADA Big Lagoon Rancheria 2 Karuk Reservation and ORTL 1,2 San Pasqual Reservation 50 5 NEVADA Big Pine Reservation 8 La Jolla Reservation 50 Santa Rosa Rancheria 21 Truckee Big Sandy Rancheria 4 La Posta Indian Reservation 50,51 Santa Rosa Reservation 36 Colusa YUBA Grass Valley Ukiah Big Valley Rancheria 5 Laytonville Rancheria 2 Santa Ynez Reservation 24 LAKE Bishop Reservation 8 Likely Rancheria 1 Santa Ysabel Reservation 50 COLUSA Yuba City Lake Blue Lake Rancheria and ORTL 2 Lone Pine Reservation 8 Sherwood Valley Rancheria and ORTL 2 Clear Lake PLACER Tahoe Bridgeport Reservation 8 Lookout Rancheria 1 Shingle Springs Rancheria 4 Clearlake Cabazon Reservation 36 Los Coyotes Reservation 50 Smith River Rancheria and ORTL 2 Lakeport Cahuilla Reservation 36 Lytton Rancheria 11 Soboba Reservation and ORTL 36 3 SUTTER Campo Indian Reservation 51 Manchester-Point Arena Rancheria 2 Stewarts Point Rancheria 2 South Capitan Grande Reservation 50 Manzanita Reservation and ORTL 50 Sulphur Bank Rancheria 3 Auburn* Lake Tahoe Cedarville Rancheria and ORTL 1 Mesa Grande Reservation 50 Susanville Indian Rancheria and ORTL 1 80 Roseville Chemehuevi Reservation 8 Middletown Rancheria 5 Sycuan Reservation 50 YOLO EL DORADO Chicken Ranch Rancheria and ORTL 4 Montgomery Creek Rancheria 1 Table Bluff Reservation 2 Placerville Cold Springs Rancheria 4 Mooretown Rancheria and ORTL 1 Table Mountain Rancheria 4 Woodland Citrus SONOMA Heights Colorado River Indian Reservation* 8,36 Morongo Reservation and ORTL 36 Timbi-Sha Shoshone Reservation and ORTL* 8 SACRAMENTO Colusa Rancheria 3 North Fork Rancheria and ORTL 4 Torres-Martinez Reservation 36,51 Windsor Arden-Arcade* 505 Davis ALPINE Cortina Indian Rancheria 3 Pala Reservation 50 Trinidad Rancheria and ORTL 2 5 Coyote Valley Reservation 2 Paskenta Rancheria 1 Tule River Reservation and ORTL 23 Santa NAPA 6 SACRAMENTO Dry Creek Rancheria 2 Pauma and Yuima Reservation 50 Tuolumne Rancheria 4 Rosa 80 Elk Grove AMADOR Elk Valley Rancheria and ORTL 2 Pechanga Reservation 42,50 Twenty-Nine Palms Reservation 8,36 Rohnert Park Ione Enterprise Rancheria 1 Picayune Rancheria and ORTL 4 Upper Lake Rancheria 3 Napa Vacaville Ewiiaapaayp Reservation 50 Pinoleville Rancheria 2 Viejas Reservation 50 Petaluma* Fairfield 7 Fort Bidwell Reservation and ORTL 1 Pit River Trust Land 1 Washoe Ranches Trust Land* 4 SOLANO CALAVERAS Fort Independence Reservation 8 Quartz Valley Reservation and ORTL 1 Woodfords Community 4 MARIN 5 Fort Mojave Reservation and ORTL* 8 Ramona Village 36 XL Ranch Rancheria 1 See Inset A Lodi San Andreas Fort Yuma Indian Reservation* 51 Redding Rancheria 1 Yurok Reservation 2 * Entity is located within more than one state. Redwood Valley Rancheria 2 TUOLUMNE Antioch* Mono CONTRA Stockton Sonora Lake COSTA 9 SAN JOAQUIN 4 14 11 MONO (pt) 580 SAN Modesto FRANCISCO ALAMEDA 680 Mammoth Lakes 15 10 STANISLAUS MARIPOSA 17 Bishop Pacific SAN San Jose* Ocean MATEO SANTA CLARA MERCED Yosemite Lakes 18 16 MADERA SANTA Los Banos CRUZ 19 Santa Cruz* San Luis Reservoir Madera Watsonville FRESNO Clovis Fresno* Inset A Salinas 5 Seaside SONOMA Vallejo SAN Monterey Lone Pine Novato SOLANO BENITO San 780 3 INYO Pablo 2 Soledad Bay 22 MARIN San Rafael 80 5 Hanford Visalia Concord 20 Lemoore MONTEREY Richmond 21 Tulare TULARE 580 CONTRA COSTA Walnut Creek Corcoran Porterville Berkeley 11 Avenal KINGS 80 13 680 San Antonio 8 SAN Reservoir FRANCISCO 12 San Francisco* Oakland Nacimiento Delano 580 Reservoir El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles) Ridgecrest ALAMEDA Daly City Pacific San 23 Ocean Francisco 15 380 Bay ARIZONA Hayward SAN LUIS 880 OBISPO San Mateo Bakersfield* Fort Irwin 14 San Luis Obispo KERN 15 280 (pt) Redwood City* SAN Fremont* MATEO SAN Scale: 1:650,000 18 SANTA Palo Santa BERNARDINO Needles 0 4 8 12 Kilometers CLARA 17 5 Alto Maria Rosamond Mountain Sunnyvale Barstow 0 4 8 12 Miles View 24 Santa Clara 40 SANTA Lancaster* Lompoc BARBARA 15 VENTURA Palmdale 25 Victorville LOS ANGELES C ol ora do Santa Barbara Santa 27 R Clarita Hesperia iv er Simi See Inset B Valley* 26 Big Bear City San Buenaventura Big River (Ventura)* Inset B San Bernardino Twentynine Palms SANTA Oxnard Thousand Oaks Scale: 1:650,000 BARBARA 26 0 4 8 12 Kilometers 33 31 25 Riverside 0 4 8 12 Miles 24 41 San VENTURA Fernando LOS Moreno Cathedral City 28 215 Valley ANGELES 27 8 Palm Desert RIVERSIDE 36 Blythe 210 SAN Indio 10 Burbank* 15 30 29 BERNARDINO Glendale Pasadena* Rancho 42 405 5 Cucamonga Murrieta 24 48 45 Temecula* 31 ORANGE El Monte 32 Fontana* 10 33 East Los Angeles* West Covina Pomona Ontario SANTA Santa Los Angeles* 26 15 Salton Monica 34 BARBARA 49 Sea 37 35 Oceanside 47 LOS 40 605 Escondido 5 Downey 41 ANGELES 50 VENTURA (pt) Inglewood* 38 15 Carlsbad SAN IMPERIAL 105 Norwalk 39 DIEGO 51 Corona 43 Compton Fullerton RIVERSIDE 710 52 44 Anaheim* San Diego* 53 El Centro Long 8 110 Beach* Orange* 46 42 Calexico Torrance* Garden Grove* 5 47(pt) ORANGE Chula Vista* Santa Huntington Ana* 45 Beach Scale: 1:1,575,000 Pacific Irvine Costa Ocean 0 15 30 45 Kilometers 48 Mesa 405 MEXICO 0 15 30 45 Miles Map Legend Number of Congressional Districts by State California Profile Population Population Density Congressional District Boundary AK Total Population: 39,144,818 2 (1) Age - Under 5: 6.4% Age - 5 to 19: 19.6% Age - 20 to 24: 7.4% Congressional District Area Age - 25 to 34: 14.9% Age - 35 to 44: 13.3% Age - 45 to 54: 13.4% Age - 55 to 64: 11.8% KANSAS State or Statistically Equivalent Entity Persons per Square Mile WA Age - 65+: 13.3% by Census Tract (10) Median Age: 36.2 10,000.0 to 173,336.5 ME MT ND (2) Percent Male: 49.7% 5,000.0 to 9,999.9 ERIE County or Statistically Equivalent Entity (1) (1) Percent Female: 1,000.0 to 4,999.9 VT 50.3% OR 100.0 to 999.9 MN (1) (5) (8) NH Veterans 18 years and older: 1,644,215 ID (2) 50.0 to 99.9 OLYMPIA (2) SD WI NY 25.0 to 49.9 MI MA (9) State Capital (1) (8) (27) Race & Hispanic Origin WY (14) Less than 25.0 (1) RI (2) IA PA CT (5) County Boundary Collinsville † NE (4) (18) NJ (12) Selected Place NV (3) OH (4) UT IL IN (16) DE (1) CA (4) CO (18) (9) WV MD (8) (3) VA Lake (53) (7) KS MO Water Body KY (11) Champlain (4) (8) (6) NC TN (13) OK 44 Interstate Highway AZ (9) (9) NM (5) AR SC (3) (4) (7) One Race AL GA White: 60.9% MS (14) (4) (7) Black or African American: 5.8% TX LA American Indian and (36) Alaska Native: 0.7% (6) Asian: 14.2% FL Native Hawaiian and (27) Other Paci�ic Islander: 0.4% Some Other Race: 13.5% HI Two or More Races: (2) 4.5% Apportionment based on the 2010 Census. Hispanic or Latino (of any race): 38.8% †Labels for places located within more than one Congressional District include a ‘*’. Education Total Population, Age 25+: 26,085,263 High School graduate Population Density Congressional districts are those in effect for the 116th Congress of the United States (January 2019-2021); or higher: 82.2% Persons per square mile all other legal boundaries and names are as of January 1, 2010. The boundaries shown on this map are for Bachelor’s degree 32.3% United States: 91.0 Census Bureau statistical data collection and tabulation purposes only; their depiction and designation for or higher: Graduate or professional California: 251.3 statistical purposes does not constitute a determination of jurisdictional authority or rights of ownership or degree: 12.0% entitlement. Housing Source: U.S. Census Bureau’s MAF/TIGER database (TAB10) Total Housing Units: 13,988,399 Projection: State-based Alber’s Equal Area Percent Occupied: 92.2% Owner Occupied: 53.6% Renter Occupied: 46.4% For general information, contact the Congressional Affairs Office at (301) 763-6100. For more information Percent Vacant: 7.8% Map Source: 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates regarding congressional district plans as a result of the 2010 Census, redistricting, and voting rights data, For more information on the American contact the Census Redistricting and Voting Rights Data Office at (301) 763-4039 or www.census.gov/rdo. Occupied Vacant Data Source: 2015 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates Community Survey, visit census.gov/acs.
Recommended publications
  • Proposed Information Collection
    13316 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 65 / Thursday, April 4, 2019 / Notices 194. Pueblo of Tesuque 239. Skokomish Indian Tribe National Indian Gaming Commission. 195. Puyallup Tribe of Indians 240. Smith River Rancheria Jonodev Chaudhuri, 196. Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe 241. Snoqualmie Tribe Chairman. 197. Quapaw Tribe of Indians 242. Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Kathryn Isom-Clause, 198. Quartz Valley Indian Community 243. Sokaogon Chippewa Community Vice Chair. 199. Quechan Tribe of Fort Yuma Indian 244. Southern Ute Indian Tribe E. Sequoyah Simermeyer, Reservation 245. Sprite Lake Tribe 200. Quileute Tribe 246. Spokane Tribe of Indians Associate Commissioner. 201. Quinault Indian Nation 247. Squaxin Island Tribe [FR Doc. 2019–06566 Filed 4–3–19; 8:45 am] 202. Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior 248. St. Croix Chippewa Indians of BILLING CODE 7565–01–P Chippewa Indians Wisconsin 203. Red Cliff, Sokaogon Chippewa and 249. St. Regis Mohawk Tribe Lac Courte Oreilles Band 250. Standing Rock Sioux Tribe INTERNATIONAL TRADE 204. Red Lake Band of Chippewa 251. Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians COMMISSION Indians 252. Stockbridge-Munsee Community 205. Redding Rancheria 253. Suquamish Tribe of the Port Miscellaneous Tariff Bill Petition 206. Redwood Valley Rancheria of Madison Reservation System; Proposed Information Pomo Indians 254. Susanville Indian Rancheria Collection; Comment Request; 207. Reno-Sparks Indian Colony 255. Swinomish Indian Tribal Miscellaneous Tariff Bill Petition 208. Resighini Rancheria of Coast Indian Community Submission and Comment Forms Community 256. Sycuan Band of Diegueno Mission AGENCY: United States International 209. Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission Indians Trade Commission. Indians 257. Table Mountain Rancheria 210.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Cri'm,Inal Justice
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. 1 I . ~ f .:.- IS~?3 INDIAN CRI'M,INAL JUSTICE 11\ PROG;RAM',"::llISPLAY . ,',' 'i\ ',,.' " ,~,~,} '~" .. ',:f,;< .~ i ,,'; , '" r' ,..... ....... .,r___ 74 "'" ~ ..- ..... ~~~- :":~\ i. " ". U.S. DE P ----''''---£iT _,__ .._~.,~~"ftjlX.£~~I.,;.,..,;tI ... ~:~~~",­ TERIOR BURE AIRS DIVISION OF _--:- .... ~~.;a-NT SERVICES J .... This Reservation criminal justice display is designed to provide information we consider pertinent, to those concerned with Indian criminal justice systems. It is not as complete as we would like it to be since reservation criminal justice is extremely complex and ever changing, to provide all the information necessary to explain the reservation criminal justice system would require a document far more exten::'.J.:ve than this. This publication will undoubtedly change many times in the near future as Indian communities are ever changing and dynamic in their efforts to implement the concept of self-determination and to upgrade their community criminal justice systems. We would like to thank all those persons who contributed to this publication and my special appreciation to Mr. James Cooper, Acting Director of the U.S. Indian Police Training and Research Center, Mr •. James Fail and his staff for their excellent work in compiling this information. Chief, Division of Law Enforcement Services ______ ~ __ ---------=.~'~r--~----~w~___ ------------------------------------~'=~--------------~--------~. ~~------ I' - .. Bureau of Indian Affairs Division of Law Enforcement Services U.S. Indian Police Training and Research Center Research and Statistical Unit S.UMM.ARY. ~L JUSTICE PROGRAM DISPLAY - JULY 1974 It appears from the attached document that the United States and/or Indian tribes have primary criminal and/or civil jurisdiction on 121 Indian reservations assigned administratively to 60 Agencies in 11 Areas, or the equivalent.
    [Show full text]
  • Federally Recognized Tribes in California by the Department of Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs October 1, 2010
    Federally Recognized Tribes in California by the Department of Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs October 1, 2010 Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation Alturas Indian Rancheria Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians (formerly the Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation) Barona Group of Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians of the Barona Reservation Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California Big Lagoon Rancheria Big Pine Band of Owens Valley Paiute Shoshone Indians of the Big Pine Reservation Big Sandy Rancheria of Mono Indians of California Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians of the Big Valley Rancheria Blue Lake Rancheria Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony of California Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California Cabazon Band of Mission Indians Cachil DeHe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community of the Colusa Rancheria Cahto Indian Tribe of the Laytonville Rancheria Cahuilla Band of Mission Indians of the Cahuilla Reservation California Valley Miwok Tribe Campo Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Campo Indian Reservation Cedarville Rancheria Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of the Chemehuevi Reservation Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California Cold Springs Rancheria of Mono Indians of California Colorado River Indian Tribes of the Colorado River Indian Reservation, Arizona and
    [Show full text]
  • Redding Rancheria Motion for Summary J
    Case3:11-cv-01493-SC Document17 Filed09/30/11 Page1 of 48 1 LESTER J. MARSTON, California State Bar No. 081030 DAVID J. RAPPORT, California State Bar No. 054384 2 RAPPORT AND MARSTON 405 West Perkins Street, P.O. Box 488 3 Ukiah, CA 95482 Telephone: 707-462-6846 4 Facsimile: 707-462-4235 e-mail: [email protected] 5 [email protected] 6 TRACY EDWARDS, California State Bar No. 195402 NEAL MALMSTEN, California State Bar No. 237487 7 OFFICE OF THE TRIBAL ATTORNEY REDDING RANCHERIA 8 2000 Redding Rancheria Road Redding, CA 96001 9 Telephone: 530-225-8979 Facsimile: 530-241-1879 10 e-mail: [email protected] [email protected] 11 12 SARA DUTSCHKE SETSHWAELO, California State Bar No. 244848 SNR DENTON US LLP th 13 525 Market Street, 26 Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2708 14 Telephone: 415-882-5000 Facsimile: 415-882-0300 15 e-mail: [email protected] 16 Attorneys for Plaintiff 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 REDDING RANCHERIA, ) Case No. CV 11-01493 SC 20 ) Plaintiff, ) 21 ) v. ) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR 22 ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT; MEMORANDUM KENNETH SALAZAR, in his official ) OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN 23 capacity as the Secretary of the United ) SUPPORT THEREOF States Department of the Interior, and ) 24 LARRY ECHO HAWK, in his official ) capacity as the Assistant Secretary for ) Date: December 2, 2011 25 Indian Affairs for the United States ) Time: 1:00 p.m. Department of the Interior, ) Ctrm.: 1, Hon. Samuel Conti 26 ) Defendants. ) 27 __________________________________) 28 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; MEMO.
    [Show full text]
  • Doi) Reorganization
    1 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 2 3 TRIBAL CONSULTATION 4 5 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (DOI) REORGANIZATION 6 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 7 8 TRANSCRIPT OF THE PROCEEDINGS 9 10 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 11 12 Jackson Rancheria Casino Resort 13 12222 New York Ranch Road 14 Jackson, California 95642 15 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 REPORTED BY: Annette Romero, Office of the Assistant Secretary – Indian Affairs and 25 Elizabeth K. Appel, Acting Chief of Staff, AS-IA 26 DATE OF PROCEEDINGS: June 19, 2018 2 1 ATTENDEES 2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 3 OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY – INDIAN AFFAIRS: 4 John Tahsuda, III, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs 5 6 OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY – INDIAN AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF REGULATORY 7 AFFAIRS AND COLLABORATIVE ACTION: 8 Elizabeth K. Appel, Director 9 Annette Romero 10 AUDIENCE MEMBERS 11 12 BEAR RIVER BAND OF THE ROHNERVILLE RANCHERIA: 13 David Montoya 14 15 CAHTO RANCHERIA TRIBE: 16 Aimie Lucas, Chairwoman 17 CLOVERDALE RANCHERIA: 18 Maria Elliott 19 Vickey Macias, Tribal Treasurer 20 CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF SILETZ: 21 Delores Pigsley, Chariwoman 22 IOWA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA: 23 Michael Garcia 24 MECHOOPALA: 25 Cassy Wilson 26 NORTH FORK MONO RANCHERIA: 27 Leora Beihn 28 Elaine Fink, Vice-Chairwoman 29 REDDING RANCHERIA: 30 Jonathan Clifton 31 Jeremy Hayward 32 Michelle Hayward 33 Mike Hollowell, Attorney 34 Hope Wilkes 3 1 ATTENDEES (CONTINUED) 2 SCOTTS VALLEY BAND OF POMO INDIANS: 3 Shawn Davis 4 SUSANVILLE INDIAN RANCHERIA 5 Deana M. Boveé, Tribal Chairwoman 6 Rietta M.
    [Show full text]
  • AFFIDAVIT in SUPPORT of SEARCH WARRANT 2 3 I, Charles Turner, Being Duly Sworn Upon Penalty of Perjury, Depose and State That: 4 1
    1 AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF SEARCH WARRANT 2 3 I, Charles Turner, being duly sworn upon penalty of perjury, depose and state that: 4 1. I have been employed since February 2001 as a Special Agent by the United States Department 5 of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Office of Justice Services, Division of Drug Enforcement. Within 6 the meaning of 25 U.S.C. § 2803, I am an officer who is empowered by law to conduct investigations, 7 make arrests, and seize property for violations of Title 18, United States Code and Title 21, United 8 States Code. I am assigned to the Western Nevada Agency Office and have been so assigned since 9 March of 2014. I am currently assigned to investigate drug trafficking organizations as they affect 10 Indian Country in the northern Nevada and California areas. 11 I. PREMISES TO BE SEARCHED 12 2. This affidavit is submitted in support of a request under F.R.Crim.P. 41 for the issuance of three 13 search warrants against the following: (1) the premises within the enclosed fenced area surrounding the 14 Alturas Rancheria Event Center and workshop building located at 901 County Road 56, Alturas, 15 California. This marijuana growing facility is located at Latitude 41° 28.642' North and Longitude 120° 16 31.513' West. An aerial photograph of the premises within the enclosed fence area to be searched is 17 attached hereto as part of Attachment A-1. This first site to be searched will sometimes be referred to 18 herein as the "Alturas Rancheria Event Center Site"; (2) the premises within the enclosed fenced area 19 surrounding the long tan building and white greenhouses, and other facilities used to manufacture 20 marijuana plants at the Pit River XL Ranch Reservation located on the west side of the highway near 21 29310 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Volkswagen Diesel Emissions Environmental Mitigation Trust For
    The Volkswagen Diesel Emissions Environmental Mitigation Trust for Indian Tribe Beneficiaries Notice of the Trust Modification Effective Date in accordance with the Order Approving Material Modifications to the Volkswagen Diesel Emissions Environmental Mitigation Trust for Indian Tribe Beneficiaries in accordance with Paragraph 6.5 of the Indian Tribe Trust and Announcement of Available Funds for the First Funding in accordance with Subparagraph 5.0.5.2 Dated: November 30, 2018 Wilmington Trust, N.A., as Trustee for the Volkswagen Diesel Emissions Environmental Mitigation Trust for Indian Tribe Beneficiaries (the “Indian Tribe Trust”) hereby gives notice that the final, fully-executed Environmental Mitigation Trust Agreement for Indian Tribe Trust Beneficiaries (as modified on November 15, 2018) (the “Modified Indian Tribe Trust Agreement”) was filed with the United States District Judge for the Northern District of California on November 30, 2018 in accordance with the Order issued by Judge Charles R. Breyer on Friday November 16, 2018 approving the proposed Material Modifications to the Indian Tribe Trust (the “Approval Order”). A copy of the final, filed version of the Modified Indian Tribe Trust Agreement and the Approval Order are attached hereto. The Approval Order provided that within two weeks of November 16, 2018 the United States, the settling defendants and the Trustee shall execute and deliver the final Modified Indian Tribe Trust Agreement and file it with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the “Court”). On the date the Modified Indian Tribe Trust Agreement is filed with the Court it shall become effective and the stay imposed by the March 2, 2018 Order will also be lifted on that same date, the “Trust Modification Effective Date” as defined therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Health Program Tool-Kit
    Tribal Health Program Tool-Kit Updated 1/26/2016 CRIHB Options 2015 California Rural Indian Health Board, Inc. 4400 Auburn Blvd., 2nd Fl. Sacramento, CA 95841 (916) 929-9761 [email protected] www.crihb.org 1 Table of Contents Page # High-Level Screening and Eligibility 4-31 . Client High-Level Screening and Eligibility Form……………………………………........... 5 . Benefit ID Number Instructions………………………………………………………………………. 6 . IHS Eligible Criteria…………………………………………………………………………………………. 7 . Tribal Affiliation Codes……………………………………………………………………………………. 9-29 . Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)………………………………………………………………… 30-31 Service Codes 32-44 . Acupuncture Services……………………………………………………………………………………… 33 . Audiology Services………………………………………………………………………………………….. 34 . Chiropractic Services………………………………………………………………………………………. 35 . Dental Services……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 36-40 . Podiatry Services…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 41-43 . Speech Therapy Services…………………………………………………………………………………. 44 Submitting Claims to CRIHB Options 45-63 . Claims processing and payments via Humboldt Independent Practice Association……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 46-50 . Claims submission via clearinghouse: Office Ally……………………………………………. 51-57 . Check claim status via Humboldt Independent Practice Association……………... 58-61 . Sample UB-04 Claim Form: Medical……………………………………………………………….. 62 . Sample UB-04 Claim Form: Dental………………………………………………………………….. 63 CRIHB Options Policies 64-88 . 101 — Program Description…………………………………………………………………………… 65-66 . 102 — Eligibility for
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Heritage Commission Response to HCD 2018 CDBG-DR
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION November 18, 2020 Joseph Helo, Program Manager CA Department of Housing and Community Development CHAIRPERSON Laura Miranda Via Email to: [email protected] Luiseño Cc to: [email protected] VICE CHAIRPERSO N Re: Native American Contact List for the Owner Occupied Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Reginald Pagali ng Program - 2018 Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery Project, Lake and Chumash Ventura Counties SECRETARY Dear Mr. Helo: Merri Lopez-Keifer Luiseño Attached are lists of tribes that have cultural and traditional affiliation to the area of potential effect (APE) for the project referenced above. I suggest you contact all of the tribes listed, and PARLIAMENTARI AN if they cannot supply information regarding the presence of cultural resources, they may Russell Attebe ry recommend others with specific knowledge. The list should provide a starting place to locate Karuk areas of potential adverse impact within the APE. By contacting all those on the list, your organization will better able to respond to claims of failure to consult, as consultation may be COMMISSIONER required under specific state Statutes. If a response from the tribe has not been received within Marshall McKay two weeks of notification, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) requests that you Wintun follow up with a telephone call or email to ensure that the project information has been received. COMMISSIONER William Mungary The NAHC also recommends that the project proponents conduct a record search of the Paiute/White Mountain NAHC’s Sacred Lands File (SLF) and also of the appropriate regional archaeological Apache Information Center of the California Historic Resources Information System (CHRIS) to determine if any tribal cultural resources are located within the APE of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Federally Recognized Indian Tribes
    Appendix C: Federally Recognized Indian Tribes The following tribal entities within the contiguous 48 states are recognized and eligible to receive services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs. For further information contact Bureau of Indian Affairs, Division of Tribal Government Services, 1849 C Street N.W., Washington, DC 20240; Telephone number (202) 208-7445.1 Figure C.1 shows the location of the Federally Recognized Tribes. 1. Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 2. Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation, California 3. Ak Chin Indian Community of Papago Indians of the Maricopa, Ak Chin Reservation, Arizona 4. Alabama and Coushatta Tribes of Texas 5. Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town of the Creek Nation of Oklahoma 6. Alturas Rancheria of Pit River Indians of California 7. Apache Tribe of Oklahoma 8. Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming 9. Aroostook Band of Micmac Indians of Maine 10. Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana 11. Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation, California 12. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin 13. Bay Mills Indian Community of the Sault Ste. Marie Band of Chippewa Indians Bay Mills. Reservation, Michigan 14. Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California 15. Big Lagoon Rancheria of Smith River Indians of California 1Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 220, November 13, 1996. C–1 Figure C.1.—Locations of Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations. C–2 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 107/Wednesday, June 3, 2020
    34228 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 107 / Wednesday, June 3, 2020 / Notices Oklahoma and the Wichita and of these human remains and associated the request to the University of the Affiliated Tribes (Wichita, Keechi, Waco funerary objects should submit a written Pacific, Dugoni School of Dentistry at & Tawakonie), Oklahoma (hereafter request with information in support of the address in this notice by July 6, referred to as ‘‘The Tribes’’). the request to Dr. Marc Levine, 2020. Associate Curator of Archaeology, Sam History and Description of the Remains ADDRESSES: Dorothy Dechant, Center for Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural Dental History and Craniofacial Study, In 1957, human remains representing, History, University of Oklahoma, 2401 University of the Pacific, Dugoni School at minimum, four individuals were Chautauqua Avenue, Norman, OK of Dentistry, 155 Fifth Street, San excavated by the University of 73072–7029, telephone (405) 325–1994, Francisco, CA 94103–2919, telephone Oklahoma at site 34Ms20 in Muskogee email [email protected], by July 6, 2020. (415) 929–6627, email ddechant@ County, OK. At an unknown date, the After that date, if no additional pacific.edu. associated cultural materials were requestors have come forward, transfer SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: transferred to the Museum. The human of control of the human remains and Notice is here given in accordance with the remains include the partial skeleton of associated funerary objects to The Native American Graves Protection and an adult male 20–35 years old that were Tribes may proceed. Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. commingled with remains of a child 7– The Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of 3003, of the completion of an inventory 9 years old, a young adult 18–22 years Natural History is responsible for of human remains under the control of old of indeterminate sex, and a young notifying The Tribes that this notice has the University of the Pacific, Dugoni adult 20–30 years old of indeterminate been published.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villages, Pueblos, Missions, Ranchos, Reservations, Colonies, and Rancherias
    Tulsa Law Review Volume 44 Issue 2 60 Years after the Enactment of the Indian Country Statute - What Was, What Is, and What Should Be Winter 2008 The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villages, Pueblos, Missions, Ranchos, Reservations, Colonies, and Rancherias William Wood Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation William Wood, The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villages, Pueblos, Missions, Ranchos, Reservations, Colonies, and Rancherias, 44 Tulsa L. Rev. 317 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr/vol44/iss2/1 This Native American Symposia Articles is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Law Review by an authorized editor of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wood: The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villa THE TRAJECTORY OF INDIAN COUNTRY IN CALIFORNIA: RANCHERIAS, VILLAGES, PUEBLOS, MISSIONS, RANCHOS, RESERVATIONS, COLONIES, AND RANCHERIAS William Wood* 1. INTRODUCTION This article examines the path, or trajectory,1 of Indian country in California. More precisely, it explores the origin and historical development over the last three centuries of a legal principle and practice under which a particular, protected status has been extended to land areas belonging to and occupied by indigenous peoples in what is now California. The examination shows that ever since the Spanish first established a continuing presence in California in 1769, the governing colonial regime has accorded Indian lands such status.
    [Show full text]