Willmoore Kendall: Conservative Iconoclast (I1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Willmoore Kendall: Conservative Iconoclast (I1 GEORGE H. NASH FEW WHO MET Willmoore Kendall ever tion far into the night. Kendall’s sister forgot him. He was born in Konawa, Okla- provides a glimpse of his arguments with homa in 1909, the son of a blind Southern his father-which suggest the pattern at Methodist minister. Kendall’s early years Oxford and wherever he went: were spent in little prairie towns where his . it was not unusual for him and Dad father preached-towns like Konawa, to engage in heated debate of a political Idabel, Mangum. He was a child prodigy issue, ending with one or the other who learned to read at the age of two by storming out of the room in anger- playing with a typewriter. He graduated and then hear them, a few hours later, from high school at thirteen, entered North- pick up the same subject, each taking western University the same year, and the opposite side of the question under graduated from the ,University of Oklaho- discussion. It was for them, I think, ma at eighteen. By the time he was twenty a very stimulating kind of mental gym- he had published a book on baseball and nastics-and it made artists of argu- was teaching in a “prep” school. He was, mentative technique out of both of in the words of a friend, “the boy wonder them.2 of Oklahoma.”1 After completing all non-thesis gradu- While Kendall’s pugnacious probing at Ox- ate work in Romance Languages at the ford was generally good-humored, his tem- University of Illinois, Kendall became a perament helps to explain the later troubled Rhodes Scholar in 1932; his next four personal and academic life of this strangely years abroad in many respects changed his driven man. entire life. It was at Oxford that he en- While abroad in the 1930’s, Kendall be- rolled in the philosophy, politics, and eco- came known as a man of the Left-even nomics (P.P.E.) program and discovered (some believed) the Trotskyist Left. While his future intellectual passion : political the precise evolution of his beliefs in this philosophy. One of his tutors was the dis- period is in some disp~te,~the testimony of tinguished philosopher R. G. Collingwood, those who knew him at Oxford is solid on who, Kendall later remarked, was a major one point: he was an enthusiastic admirer influence. The years in England were ones of the Spanish Republic. In 1935 he left of excitement, challenge, and intellectual Oxford for a sojourn as a United Press exploration, and in this atmosphere Kendall correspondent in Madrid. There is little thrived. He was argumentative, even quar- doubt that this experience, which ended relsome, and soon earned a reputation as a shortly before the civil war broke out on brilliant, eccentric, and sometimes impos- July 18, 1936, was in political terms one of sible fellow. He loved to shock people in- the decisive moments of his career. Pas- to debate, taking on all comers in disputa- sionately in favor of the leftist Spanish Re- Modern Age 127 LICENSED TO UNZ.ORG ELECTRONIC REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED public, Kendall became associated with a he advocated the Ludlow Amendment, un- number of prominent Spanish Trotskyists der which the United States could not of- in Madrid.4 According to Kendall’s first ficially go to war (except in case of inva- wife, whom he married in 1935, Kendall’s sion) until a national referendum was held. affinity for the Trotskyists was in large part “There are those of us,” he declared, “who a reaction against Stalinism. In the turbu- believe that the best judges of a nation’s lent cockpit of Spanish political warfare, welfare are the people who live in it; and Kendall’s detestation of Stalin and the Mos- once that belief has been set aside, the door cow-oriented Communists grew.5 The dicta- is thrown wide open to the most violent torial, totalitarian, anti-democratic aspects excesses of minority of Communism appalled him. He later told Meanwhile Kendall continued his study a friend that as Spain slid toward civil war of political philosophy. Changing his field he could tolerate the ‘Communists’ blowing from Romance Languages, he obtained his up the plants of opposition newspapers. But Ph.D. from the University of Illinois in when they deliberately killed opposition Political Science in 1940. His dissertation newsboys-this was too much! Exposure adviser was Francis Wilson, one of the to the Spanish Republic “really shook Will- pioneers of the postwar conservative moore up,” one friend recalled, and with- renascence. Kendall’s dissertation, pub- in a few months “his thought crystallized lished a year later, was true to his tempera- into fervent anti-Communism.”‘ This theme ment: daring, relentlessly argued, and un- -militant, uncompromising hostility to orthodox.12 ‘Challenging the conventional Communism-became one of the dominant notion that John Locke was the champion features of his thought. The disintegration of inalienable natural rights, Kendall of Spain, the awful specter of civil war, meticulously contended that Locke was ac- started a disillusioned man on the road to tually a “majority rule” democrat. To be the Right. Like so many other postwar con- sure, Locke talked of natural rights, but in servatives (Whittaker Chambers, Frank the last analysis he “would entrust to the Rleyer, and more), in Kendall’s past was majority the power of defining individual a god-or, more likely in his case, only rights.”’3 “. Locke’s natural rights are a demigod-that failed.* merely the natural rights vouchsafed by a But if Kendall’s anti-Stalinism was the legislature responsible to the majori- genesis of a later, broader anti-Commu- ty. .”I4 The society is sovereign, not the nism, it did not make an instant conserva- individual, whose rights are “a function of, tive out of him. Returning to the University not a limitation on” the society.15 How of Illinois in the fall of 1936, Kendall con- could Locke have both “rights” and majori- tinued to be a man of the Left. He sup- ty dominance? Because, said Kendall, of ported the cause of Republican Spain and his “latent premise” that his kind of ma- was even accused of recruiting students for jority “would never withdraw a right which the Abraham Lincoln Brigade. His first the individual ought to have.”16 scholarly articles in the late 1930’s were of Kendall’s work, which was recognized a decidedly left-wing cast-articles in which as a major piece of scholarship on the he advocated, for example, government Locke “problem,” inaugurated one of the ownership of the presss and contended that most unusual academic careers of his time. an “economic oligarchy” had always held After government service during and after political power in America.lo Ever distrust- World War I1 (including a high position ful of elites, Kendall enunciated a radical at the Central Intelligence Agency) ,I7 Ken- democratic viewpoint-a position some- dall joined the Yale University faculty in what in vogue in the late 1930’s during the 1947 and stayed for fourteen tumultuous debate over majority rule versus the “nine and bitter years. His letters from this peri- old men” on the Supreme Court. In 1938 od are full of stories of departmental’war- 128 Spring 1975 LICENSED TO UNZ.ORG ELECTRONIC REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED fare; never, although he had tenure, did of the late 1940,s and early 1950’s: the Yale grant him a promotion from associate status and influence of Communism in professor. Finally, in 1961, when Kendall American life. Into this fray he moved with believed it clear that he would never go characteristic vigor and flamboyance, soon higher at Yale, he offered to leave-if emerging as one of the most capable of the Yale “bought up” his tenure rights. Yale academic defenders of Senator Joseph Mc- agreed and paid him a sum in the tens of Carthy, whom he knew personally. Tire- thousands of dollars. Kendall told a friend lessly he defended McCarthy’s crusade, that he was “the only man that Yale ever Whittaker ‘Chambers, and the determina- paid to resign from its faculty.yy18 tion of many Americans to declare Commu- In his early years at Yale,1° Kendall’s nists beyond the bounds of public protec- principal scholarly enthusiasms were “ma- tion. He criticized Alger Hiss and J. Robert jority-rule democracy” and the related Oppenheimer23-activities not likely to critique of the “open society.” He called smooth the ruffled feathers of some of his himself “an old-fashioned majority-rule enemies on the Left. Discussing the Nixon- democrat,” by which he meant that the peo- Mundt bill to control Communism in 1950, ple in a democracy had “not only the right Kendall even suggested deportation as a but the duty. to use public policy as an possible sanction against Communists (and, instrument for creating the kind of society back in the 1930’~~Nazis, too). Kendall their values call for. .” He was there- acknowledged that “liquidation of a fore flatly against attempts to limit majori- minority” must be a very careful undertak- ties by bills of rights;20 such attempts were, ing. But he insisted on two principles: ipso facto, undemocratic. Why was he so unremittingly hostile to the natural rights . a) that a democratic society that philosophy? A passage from a critique of has a meaning to preserve, as I think one of his favorite target-John Stuart ours still does, must stand prepared to Mill-provides a clue: make such decisions, and b) that the surest way for it to lose its meaning is Start out with Mill’s principles, and you for it to tell itself, and its potential dis- end, as Mill himself did, with the sidents, that where dissidence is con- anarchistic view that there are no limits cerned, the sky’s the limit.24 whatever upon the degree of “diversity” a society can stomach and still survive In another letter several years later Kendall (wherefore we must today tolerate, for amplified his point.