DOCSLIB.ORG

Effect of Microencapsulation on the Viability of Probiotic Bacteria Under Storage and Simulated

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Effect of Microencapsulation on the Viability of Probiotic Bacteria Under Storage and Simulated الجمهورية الجزائرية الديمقراطية الشعبية وزارة التعليم العالي و البحث العلمي People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research جامعة محمد الصديق بن يحي - جيجل University Mohammed Seddik Benyahia - Jijel كلية علوم الطبيعة و الحياة Faculty of Nature and Life Sciences قسم المكروبيولوجيا التطبيقية وعلوم التغذية Department of Applied Microbiology and Food Sciences Thesis Realized by Samiya AMIRA In Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Sciences In Biology Option: Microbial Biotechnology Effect of microencapsulation on the viability of probiotic bacteria under storage and simulated gastrointestinal conditions Under the Supervision of: Pr. Mohammed SIFOUR Examiners committee Chairman: Pr. Tayeb IDOUI University Mohamed Seddik Benyahia-Jijel Supervisor: Pr. Mohammed SIFOUR University Mohamed Seddik Benyahia-Jijel Examiners: Dr. Hani BELHADJ University of Farhat Abbas-Setif 01 Dr. Abdelhakim AOUF University of Farhat Abbas-Setif 01 Dr. Abdelhafid BOUBENDIR University of Abdelhafid Boussouf -Mila Academic year: 2019/2020 Serial number: Acknowledgments Firstly, I thank Allah for all things given for me, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor Prof. Mohammed SIFOUR for the continuous support of my doctorate thesis and related research, for his patience, motivation, and immense knowledge. His guidance helped me in all the time of research and writing of this thesis. I could not have imagined having a better advisor for my doctorate study. A very special gratitude goes out to Prof. Houria OULED HADDAR and Prof. Tayeb IDOUI for helping me during the realization of this work. Besides my advisor, I would like to thank the members of thesis committee, the chairman Prof. Tayeb IDOUI, and the examiners Dr. Hani BELHADJ, Dr. Abdelhakim AOUF and Dr. Abdehafid BOUBENDIR for their acceptance to evaluate this work. I am grateful to my mother, who has provided me through moral and emotional support in my life. I am also grateful to my father, brother, sisters and friends who have supported me along the way. With a special mention to Dr. Asma Cherbal, for her patience, her help in material provided and thesis redaction. I acknowledge also, Ms. Saliha Hirache and Ms. Moufida Bensam for their emotional support. Another person to whom I address my special thanks, for his help in the thesis manuscript, thank you Ahmed. Big thanks for Ms. Sawsen Hadef, Mr. Tarek Khennouf and Mr.Mohammed Taher Boubezari. I am grateful to Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research to support this research. My sincere thanks also go to Pr. Gianluigi Mauriello, from the University of Federico II, Naples, Italy, who provided me an opportunity to join his laboratory team: Dr. Diamante Maresca, and Dr. Annachiara De prisco, who gave me the opportunity to access to the laboratory and research facilities. I am also grateful to the staff of Laboratory of Applied Microbiology and Laboratory of Molecular Toxicology at the University Mohamed Seddik Benyahia, Jijel. And finally, I thank everyone who contributed in the realization of this thesis. Thanks for all your encouragement ii List of content Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... ii List of abbreviations...................................................................................................................... iii List of figures ................................................................................................................................ iv List of tables .................................................................................................................................. vi Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 I. Literature review I.1. Lactic acid bacteria and probiotics ......................................................................................... 3 I.1.1. Probiotics ............................................................................................................................. 3 I.1.2. Lactic acid bacteria .............................................................................................................. 3 I.1.3. Screening and selection of probiotics .................................................................................. 5 I.1.4. Health benefits and mechanisms of action of LAB ............................................................ 6 I.2. Klila ........................................................................................................................................ 8 I.3. Microencapsulation ................................................................................................................. 11 I.3.1. Definition ............................................................................................................................. 11 I.3.2. Encapsulating materials ....................................................................................................... 12 I.3.2.1. Alginate............................................................................................................................. 12 I.3.2.2. Gellen gum........................................................................................................................ 12 I.3.2.3. Xanthan gum ..................................................................................................................... 13 I.3.2.4. Chitosan ............................................................................................................................ 13 I.3.2.5. Cellulose Acetate Phtalate (CAP) ..................................................................................... 13 I.3.2.6. Starch ................................................................................................................................ 13 I.3.2.7. K-carrageenan ................................................................................................................... 14 I.3.2.8. Gum Arabic (Acacia gum) ................................................................................................ 14 I.3.2.9. Locust bean gum .............................................................................................................. 15 I.3.2.10. Gelatin............................................................................................................................. 15 I.3.2.11.Whey and Milk proteins ................................................................................................. 15 I.3.2.12.Pectin ............................................................................................................................... 16 I.3.2.13. Chickpea protein ............................................................................................................. 16 I.3.3. Encapsulating techniques ..................................................................................................... 16 I.3.3.1. Extrusion ........................................................................................................................... 16 I.3.3.2. Emulsion ........................................................................................................................... 17 I.3.3.3. Spray drying...................................................................................................................... 18 I.3.3.4. Coacervation ..................................................................................................................... 19 I.3.3.5. Spray chilling/cooling/congealing .................................................................................... 19 I.3.3.6. Freeze-drying .................................................................................................................... 19 I.3.4. Factors affecting on microencapsulation effectiveness ....................................................... 19 I.3.5. Applications of microencapsulation .................................................................................... 20 I.3.6. Probiotics in food products .................................................................................................. 20 I.3.6.1. Dairy products ................................................................................................................. 20 I.3.7.1.1. Yoghurts ........................................................................................................................ 21 I.3.6.1.2. Cheese ............................................................................................................................ 21 I.3.6.1.3. Ice cream and frozen dairy desserts ............................................................................... 21 I.3.6.2. Non-dairy products ........................................................................................................... 21 I.3.6.3. Other food carriers ............................................................................................................ 22 II. Materials and methods II.1. Bacterial isolates ....................................................................................................................... 23 II.2. Media and chemicals ................................................................................................................. 23 II.3. Isolation and purification of lactic acid bacteria
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UCC Library and UCC Researchers Have Made This Item Openly Available. Please Let Us Know How This Has Helped You. Thanks! Downlo
    UCC Library and UCC researchers have made this item openly available. Please let us know how this has helped you. Thanks! Title Bacterial inhabitants of tumours: methods for exploration and exploitation Author(s) Walker, Sidney P. Publication date 2020-05-04 Original citation Walker, S. P. 2020. Bacterial inhabitants of tumours: methods for exploration and exploitation. PhD Thesis, University College Cork. Type of publication Doctoral thesis Rights © 2020, Sidney P. Walker. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Item downloaded http://hdl.handle.net/10468/10055 from Downloaded on 2021-10-08T08:21:36Z Coláiste na hOllscoile, Corcaigh THE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND, CORK School of Microbiology Bacterial inhabitants of tumours: Methods for exploration and exploitation Thesis presented by Sidney Walker Under the supervision of Dr. Mark Tangney and Dr. Marcus Claesson For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2016-2020 1 Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Chapter I: Literature Review .............................................................................................................. 7 Section 1: Sequencing and the Microbiome ........................................................................ 7 The Microbiome ............................................................................................................... 8 Sequencing ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Vertical Flow Exchange on Microbial Community Dis- Tributions in Hyporheic Zones
    Article 1 by Heejung Kim and Kang-Kun Lee* Effect of vertical flow exchange on microbial community dis- tributions in hyporheic zones School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea; *Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected] (Received: November 2, 2018; Revised accepted: January 6, 2019) https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2019/019001 The effect of the vertical flow direction of hyporheic flux advance of hydrodynamic modeling has improved research of hydro- on the bacterial community is examined. Vertical velocity logical exchange processes at the hyporheic zone (Cardenas and Wil- change of the hyporheic zone was examined by installing son, 2007; Fleckenstein et al., 2010; Endreny et al., 2011). Also, this a piezometer on the site, and a total of 20,242 reads were zone has plentiful micro-organisms. The hyporheic zone constituents analyzed using a pyrosequencing assay to investigate the a dynamic hotspot (ecotone) where groundwater and surface water diversity of bacterial communities. Proteobacteria (55.1%) mix (Smith et al., 2008). were dominant in the hyporheic zone, and Bacteroidetes This area constitutes a flow path along which surface water down wells into the streambed sediment and groundwater up wells in the (16.5%), Actinobacteria (7.1%) and other bacteria phylum stream, travels for some distance before eventually mixing with (Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria, Chloroflexi, Planctomycetesm groundwater returns to the stream channel (Hassan et al., 2015). Sur- and unclassified phylum OD1) were identified. Also, the face water enters the hyporheic zone when the vertical hydraulic head hyporheic zone was divided into 3 points – down welling of surface water is greater than the groundwater (down welling).
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Daughtry, Katheryne Virginia
    ABSTRACT DAUGHTRY, KATHERYNE VIRGINIA. Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Lactobacillus buchneri Strains Isolated from Spoiled Fermented Cucumber. (Under the direction of Dr. Rodolphe Barrangou and Dr. Suzanne D. Johanningsmeier). Lactobacillus buchneri is a facultative anaerobe and member of the lactic acid bacteria. L. buchneri has been isolated from various environments, but most commonly from decomposing plant material, such as silage and spoiled food products, including wine, beer, Swiss cheese, mayonnaise, and fermented cucumber. Recently, the metabolic pathway for the conversion of lactic acid to acetic acid and 1,2-propanediol was annotated in this species. Although this metabolic pathway is not common in most lactic acid bacteria, L. buchneri degrades lactate under various conditions. Lactic acid utilization in fermented cucumbers leads to a rise in pH, ultimately spoiling the product. In previous studies, strains of L. buchneri isolated from fermented cucumber spoiled displayed variation in colony morphologies. It was predicted the isolates were phenotypically and genotypically diverse, and that the abilities to degrade lactic acid may be strain specific. To examine this hypothesis, thirty-five L. buchneri cultures isolated from spoiled fermented cucumber and the type strain isolated from tomato pulp were characterized and unique strains were subjected to whole genome sequencing. Each isolate was genotypically and phenotypically characterized using 16S rDNA sequencing, DiversiLab® rep-PCR, colony morphology on MRS agar, carbohydrate profiling, growth rates in MRS media, and the ability to degrade lactic acid in a modified MRS medium. Great diversity in colony morphology revealed variations of color (ranging from opaque yellow to white), texture (brittle, viscous, or powdery), shape (umbonate, flat, circular, or irregular) and size (1 mm- 11mm).
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Mechanisms of Inhibition of Streptococcus Species by Phytochemicals
    molecules Review Molecular Mechanisms of Inhibition of Streptococcus Species by Phytochemicals Soheila Abachi 1, Song Lee 2 and H. P. Vasantha Rupasinghe 1,* 1 Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS PO Box 550, Canada; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Dentistry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS PO Box 15000, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-902-893-6623 Academic Editors: Maurizio Battino, Etsuo Niki and José L. Quiles Received: 7 January 2016 ; Accepted: 6 February 2016 ; Published: 17 February 2016 Abstract: This review paper summarizes the antibacterial effects of phytochemicals of various medicinal plants against pathogenic and cariogenic streptococcal species. The information suggests that these phytochemicals have potential as alternatives to the classical antibiotics currently used for the treatment of streptococcal infections. The phytochemicals demonstrate direct bactericidal or bacteriostatic effects, such as: (i) prevention of bacterial adherence to mucosal surfaces of the pharynx, skin, and teeth surface; (ii) inhibition of glycolytic enzymes and pH drop; (iii) reduction of biofilm and plaque formation; and (iv) cell surface hydrophobicity. Collectively, findings from numerous studies suggest that phytochemicals could be used as drugs for elimination of infections with minimal side effects. Keywords: streptococci; biofilm; adherence; phytochemical; quorum sensing; S. mutans; S. pyogenes; S. agalactiae; S. pneumoniae 1. Introduction The aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge of the antimicrobial activity of naturally occurring molecules isolated from plants against Streptococcus species, focusing on their mechanisms of action. This review will highlight the phytochemicals that could be used as alternatives or enhancements to current antibiotic treatments for Streptococcus species.
    [Show full text]
  • Probiotic Dairy Products Society of Dairy Technology Series
    Probiotic Dairy Products Society of Dairy Technology Series Series Editor: Adnan Y. Tamime The Society of Dairy Technology has joined with Wiley‐Blackwell to produce a series of technical dairy‐related handbooks providing an invaluable resource for all those involved in the dairy industry; from practitioners to technologists working in both tradi- tional and modern large‐scale dairy operations. Probiotic Dairy Products, 2nd Edition, ISBN 9781119214106 by Adnan Y. Tamime and Linda V. Thomas (Editors) Microbial Toxins in Dairy Products, ISBN 9781118756430 by Adnan Y. Tamime (Editor) Biofilms in the Dairy Industry, ISBN 9781118876213 by Koon Hoong Teh, Steve Flint, John Brooks, and Geoff Knight (Editors) Milk and Dairy Products as Functional Foods, ISBN 9781444336832 by Ara Kanekanian (Editor) Membrane Processing: Dairy and Beverage Applications, ISBN 9781444333374 by Adnan Y. Tamime (Editor) Processed Cheese and Analogues, ISBN 9781405186421 by Adnan Y. Tamime (Editor) Technology of Cheesemaking, 2nd Edition, ISBN 9781405182980 by Barry A. Law and Adnan Y. Tamime (Editors) Dairy Fats and Related Products, ISBN 9781405150903 by Adnan Y. Tamime (Editor) Dairy Powders and Concentrated Products, ISBN 9781405157643 by Adnan Y. Tamime (Editor) Milk Processing and Quality Management, ISBN 9781405145305 by Adnan Y. Tamime (Editor) Cleaning‐in‐Place: Dairy, Food and Beverage Operations, 3rd Edition, ISBN 9781405155038 by Adnan Y. Tamime (Editor) Structure of Dairy Products, ISBN 9781405129756 by Adnan Y. Tamime (Editor) Brined Cheeses, ISBN 9781405124607 by Adnan Y. Tamime (Editor) Fermented Milks, ISBN 9780632064588 by Adnan Y. Tamime (Editor) Probiotic Dairy Products, ISBN 9781405121248 by Adnan Y. Tamime (Editor) Probiotic Dairy Products Second Edition Edited by Adnan Y.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7820,184 B2 Stritzker Et Al
    USOO782O184B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7820,184 B2 Stritzker et al. (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 26, 2010 (54) METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR 5,833,975 A 1 1/1998 Paoletti et al. ............. 424.93.2 DETECTION OF MICROORGANISMS AND 5,976,796. A 1 1/1999 Szalay et al. ................... 435/6 SirNRTREATMENT OF DISEASES AND 6,025,155 A 2/2000 Hadlaczky et al. ......... 435/69.1 6,045,802 A 4/2000 Schlom et al. ........... 424,199.1 (75) Inventors: Jochen Harald Stritzker, Kissing (DE); 6,077,697 A 6/2000 Hadlaczky et al. 435/1723 Phil Hill, West Bridgford (GB); Aladar 6,080,849 A 6/2000 Bermudes et al. .......... 536,23.7 A. Szalay, Highland, CA (US); Yong A. 6,093,700 A 7/2000 Mastrangelo et al. ......... 514,44 Yu, San Diego, CA (US) 6,099,848. A 8/2000 Frankel et al. ........... 424,246.1 6,106,826 A 8/2000 Brandt et al. .............. 424.93.2 (73) Assignee: stylus Corporation, San Diego, CA 6, 190,657 B1 2/2001 Pawelek et al. ............ 424,931 6,217,847 B1 4/2001 Contaget al. ................ 4249.1 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 6,232,523 B1 5/2001 Tan et al. ...................... 800, 10 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 6,235,967 B1 5/2001 Tan et al. ...................... 800, 10 U.S.C. 154(b) by 362 days. 6,235,968 B1 5/2001 Tan et al. ...................... 800, 10 6,251,384 B1 6/2001 Tan et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Variations in the Bacterial Community Compositions at Different Sites in The
    Microbiological Research 196 (2017) 26–33 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Microbiological Research j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/micres Variations in the bacterial community compositions at different sites in the tomb of Emperor Yang of the Sui Dynasty a,∗ b c d d,∗∗ Zhi Huang , Fei Zhao , Yonghui Li , Jianwei Zhang , Youzhi Feng a Key Laboratory of Agricultural Environmental Microbiology, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China b Nanjing Institute for Comprehensive utilization of Wild Plants, China CO-OP, Nanjing 210042, China c Key Laboratory of Urban and Architectural Heritage Conservation of Ministry of Education, School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China d State Key Laboratory Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: To fully understand the bacterial processes in tomb environments, it is necessary to investigate the details Received 20 August 2016 of the bacterial communities present under such oligotrophic conditions. Here, high-throughput sequenc- Received in revised form ing based on partial 16S rRNA gene sequences was used to fully evaluate the bacterial communities at 29 November 2016 different sites in the tomb of Emperor Yang of the Sui Dynasty. We also aimed to identify the soil factors Accepted 7 December 2016 that were significant related to bacterial diversity and community composition. The results showed the Available online 16 December 2016 presence of a broad taxonomic diversity that included nine major phyla.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Bacterial Orders.Pdf
    A.Phylum Acidobacteria I. Class Acidobacteria i. Acidobacteriales i Acidobacteriaceae 1 Acidobacterium 2 Edaphobacter 3 Terriglobus II.Class Holophagae i. Acanthopleuribacterales i Acanthopleuribacteraceae 1 Acanthopleuribacter ii. Holophagales i Holophagaceae 1 Geothrix 2 Holophaga B.Phylum Actinobacteria I. Class Actinobacteria i. Sphaerobacteridae i Sphaerobacterales 1 Sphaerobacterineae a Sphaerobacteraceae i Sphaerobacter ii. Rubrobacteridae i Rubrobacterales 1 Rubrobacterineae a Conexibacteraceae i Conexibacter b Patulibacteraceae i Patulibacter c Rubrobacteraceae i Rubrobacter d Solirubrobacteraceae i Solirubrobacter e Thermoleophilaceae i Thermoleophilum iii. Coriobacteridae i Coriobacteriales 1 Coriobacterineae a Coriobacteriaceae i Atopobium ii Collinsella iii Coriobacterium iv Cryptobacterium v Denitrobacterium vi Eggerthella vii Olsenella viii Slackia iv. Actinobacteridae i Bifidobacteriales 1 Bifidobacteriaceae a Aeriscardovia b Alloscardovia c Bifidobacterium d Gardnerella e Metascardovia f Parascardovia g Scardovia 2 Unclassified ii Actinomycetales 1 Streptosporangineae a Thermomonosporaceae i Actinocorallia ii Actinomadura iii Excellospora iv Spirillospora v Thermomonospora b Nocardiopsaceae i Nocardiopsis ii Streptomonospora iii Thermobifida c Streptosporangiaceae i Acrocarpospora ii Herbidospora iii Microbispora iv Microtetraspora v Nonomuraea vi Planobispora vii Planomonospora viii Planotetraspora ix Sphaerisporangium x Streptosporangium xi Thermopolyspora 2 Streptomycineae a Sterptomycetaceae i Actinopycnidium ii Actinosporangium
    [Show full text]
  • Using Oxygen and Biopreservation As Hurdles to Improve Safety Of
    USING OXYGEN AND BIOPRESERVATION AS HURDLES TO IMPROVE SAFETY OF COOKED FOOD DURING STORAGE AT REFRIGERATION TEMPERATURES By NYDIA MUNOZ A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Biological Systems Engineering MAY 2018 © Copyright by NYDIA MUNOZ, 2018 All Rights Reserved © Copyright by NYDIA MUNOZ, 2018 All Rights Reserved To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the dissertation of NYDIA MUNOZ find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. Shyam Sablani, Ph.D., Chair Juming Tang, Ph.D. Gustavo V. Barbosa-Cánovas, Ph.D. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENT My special gratitude to my advisor Dr. Shyam Sablani for taking me as one his graduate students and supporting me through my Ph.D. study and research. His guidance helped me in all the time of research and writing of this thesis. At the same time, I would like to thank my committee members Dr. Juming Tang and Dr. Gustavo V. Barbosa-Cánovas for their valuable suggestions on my research and allowing me to use their respective laboratories and instruments facilities. I am grateful to Mr. Frank Younce, Mr. Peter Gray and Ms. Tonia Green for training me in the use of relevant equipment to conduct my research, and their technical advice and practical help. Also, the assistance and cooperation of Dr. Helen Joyner, Dr. Barbara Rasco, and Dr. Meijun Zhu are greatly appreciated. I am grateful to Dr. Kanishka Buhnia for volunteering to carry out microbiological counts by my side as well as his contribution and critical inputs to my thesis work.
    [Show full text]
  • ( 12 ) United States Patent
    US010398154B2 (12 ) United States Patent ( 10 ) Patent No. : US 10 , 398 , 154 B2 Embree et al. ( 45 ) Date of Patent: * Sep . 3 , 2019 (54 ) MICROBIAL COMPOSITIONS AND ( 58 ) Field of Classification Search METHODS OF USE FOR IMPROVING MILK None PRODUCTION See application file for complete search history . (71 ) Applicant: ASCUS BIOSCIENCES , INC ., San Diego , CA (US ) (56 ) References Cited ( 72 ) Inventors: Mallory Embree, San Diego , CA (US ) ; U . S . PATENT DOCUMENTS Luke Picking , San Diego , CA ( US ) ; 3 , 484 , 243 A 12 / 1969 Anderson et al . Grant Gogul , Cardiff , CA (US ) ; Janna 4 ,559 , 298 A 12 / 1985 Fahy Tarasova , San Diego , CA (US ) (Continued ) (73 ) Assignee : Ascus Biosciences , Inc. , San Diego , FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS CA (US ) CN 104814278 A 8 / 2015 ( * ) Notice : Subject to any disclaimer , the term of this EP 0553444 B1 3 / 1998 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 U .S . C . 154 (b ) by 0 days. (Continued ) This patent is subject to a terminal dis OTHER PUBLICATIONS claimer . Borling , J , Master' s thesis, 2010 . * (21 ) Appl. No .: 16 / 029, 398 ( Continued ) ( 22 ) Filed : Jul. 6 , 2018 Primary Examiner - David W Berke- Schlessel (65 ) Prior Publication Data ( 74 ) Attorney , Agent, or Firm — Cooley LLP US 2018 /0325966 A1 Nov . 15 , 2018 ( 57 ) ABSTRACT Related U . S . Application Data The disclosure relates to isolated microorganisms — includ (63 ) Continuation of application No. ing novel strains of the microorganisms - microbial consor PCT/ US2014 /012573 , filed on Jan . 6 , 2017 . tia , and compositions comprising the same . Furthermore , the disclosure teaches methods of utilizing the described micro (Continued ) organisms, microbial consortia , and compositions compris (51 ) Int.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1. Validly Published Names, Conserved and Rejected Names, And
    Appendix 1. Validly published names, conserved and rejected names, and taxonomic opinions cited in the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology since publication of Volume 2 of the Second Edition of the Systematics* JEAN P. EUZÉBY New phyla Alteromonadales Bowman and McMeekin 2005, 2235VP – Valid publication: Validation List no. 106 – Effective publication: Names above the rank of class are not covered by the Rules of Bowman and McMeekin (2005) the Bacteriological Code (1990 Revision), and the names of phyla are not to be regarded as having been validly published. These Anaerolineales Yamada et al. 2006, 1338VP names are listed for completeness. Bdellovibrionales Garrity et al. 2006, 1VP – Valid publication: Lentisphaerae Cho et al. 2004 – Valid publication: Validation List Validation List no. 107 – Effective publication: Garrity et al. no. 98 – Effective publication: J.C. Cho et al. (2004) (2005xxxvi) Proteobacteria Garrity et al. 2005 – Valid publication: Validation Burkholderiales Garrity et al. 2006, 1VP – Valid publication: Vali- List no. 106 – Effective publication: Garrity et al. (2005i) dation List no. 107 – Effective publication: Garrity et al. (2005xxiii) New classes Caldilineales Yamada et al. 2006, 1339VP VP Alphaproteobacteria Garrity et al. 2006, 1 – Valid publication: Campylobacterales Garrity et al. 2006, 1VP – Valid publication: Validation List no. 107 – Effective publication: Garrity et al. Validation List no. 107 – Effective publication: Garrity et al. (2005xv) (2005xxxixi) VP Anaerolineae Yamada et al. 2006, 1336 Cardiobacteriales Garrity et al. 2005, 2235VP – Valid publica- Betaproteobacteria Garrity et al. 2006, 1VP – Valid publication: tion: Validation List no. 106 – Effective publication: Garrity Validation List no. 107 – Effective publication: Garrity et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Topic 1. Introduction to Microbiology. the Subject and Tasks
    Contents Topic 1. Introduction to microbiology. The subject and tasks of microbiology. A short historical essay………………………………………………………………5 Topic 2. Systematics and nomenclature of microorganisms……………………. 10 Topic 3. General characteristics of prokaryotic cells. Gram’s method ………...45 Topic 4. Principles of health protection and safety rules in the microbiological laboratory. Design, equipment, and working regimen of a microbiological laboratory………………………………………………………………………….162 Topic 5. Physiology of bacteria, fungi, viruses, mycoplasmas, rickettsia……...185 TOPIC 1. INTRODUCTION TO MICROBIOLOGY. THE SUBJECT AND TASKS OF MICROBIOLOGY. A SHORT HISTORICAL ESSAY. Contents 1. Subject, tasks and achievements of modern microbiology. 2. The role of microorganisms in human life. 3. Differentiation of microbiology in the industry. 4. Communication of microbiology with other sciences. 5. Periods in the development of microbiology. 6. The contribution of domestic scientists in the development of microbiology. 7. The value of microbiology in the system of training veterinarians. 8. Methods of studying microorganisms. Microbiology is a science, which study most shallow living creatures - microorganisms. Before inventing of microscope humanity was in dark about their existence. But during the centuries people could make use of processes vital activity of microbes for its needs. They could prepare a koumiss, alcohol, wine, vinegar, bread, and other products. During many centuries the nature of fermentations remained incomprehensible. Microbiology learns morphology, physiology, genetics and microorganisms systematization, their ecology and the other life forms. Specific Classes of Microorganisms Algae Protozoa Fungi (yeasts and molds) Bacteria Rickettsiae Viruses Prions The Microorganisms are extraordinarily widely spread in nature. They literally ubiquitous forward us from birth to our death. Daily, hourly we eat up thousands and thousands of microbes together with air, water, food.
    [Show full text]