A New Kind of Flying Bishop?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A New Kind of Flying Bishop? March/April 2000 Volume 19, Number 2 THE BI-MONTHLY MAGAZINE OF THE PRAYER BOOK SOCIETY A New Kind of Flying Bishop? Archbishop Moses Tay John Rodgers Chuck Murphy Archbishop Emmanuel Kolini Two American citizens who are priests of the Episcopal Church are now also fly-in Bishops from Asia and Africa. See inside pages 2ff. for details and comment. THE LIVING PAST FOR THE PRESENT AND INTO THE FUTURE SINGAPORE CONSECRATIONS o understand the background to the Consecrations in Singapore on 1. Initial Press Release from Singapore, January 29,2000 TJanuary 29 it is necessary to be aware of this Letter to the Participants and invited observers attending the Group of Primates meeting held in NEW BISHOPS FROM AFRICA AND ASIA CONSECRATED Kampala, 16th to 18th November 1999. AND SENT TO THE UNITED STATES As we come to the end of this consultation together, we thank God St. Andrew's Cathedral, Singapore, January 29, 2000 for our fellowship with you in our Lord Jesus Christ. We deeply respect your devotion to Christian truth and commitment to mission and service. An intemational group of Anglican Archbishops and Bishops today We also hear and understand what you have told us about examples of consecrated the Rev. Charles H. Murphy HI and the Very Rev. Dr. John abandonment of Anglican teaching, discipline and practices in the H. Rodgers Jr., as Bishops who will be released to minister in the United provinces from which you come. We share your distress on account ofthe States of America. "The releasing of bishops into another province is an damage and harmful results of these increasingly serious developments. action not without precedence in the Anghcan Communion " said Bishop C. FitzSimons Allison, former bishop of South Carolina. We declare our solidarity with you first of all in prayer. Together we have seen that God's Church is healed only through God's grace, mercy Murphy, the rector of one of the fastest growing Episcopal Churches and power. We assure you, too, that among us are those ready to respond in the U.S., and Rodgers, Dean Emeritus of Trinity Episcopal School for to specific and urgent situations which may arise in the months before the Ministry in Ambridge, Pennsylvania, have agreed to step forward at this Primates' Meeting in Portugal from. 23rd to 28th March. Parishes and moment of crisis, in an initiative aimed at reversing a 30-year decline of clergy under threat because of their loyalty to the Gospel and to Anglican 30 percent in the membership of the Episcopal Church of the U.S.A. standards must be supported and we will play our part in such support. "This crisis of decline is a of the Christian Faith that has left the Episcopal Church divided," said Rodgers. "Our calMng is to minister to At the forthcoming Primates' Meeting we will inform our colleagues those congregations who beheve that the authority of Scripture and the of the intolerable situation that you and others like you are facing. We historic Creeds are central to our Faith, conduct, and unity as Anghcans," will carefully document and commend a proposal to this meeting which, said Murphy. we believe, will address the problems in our Communion caused by mis­ use of autonomy and innovations exceeding the limits of our Anglican The two Bishops will provide pastoral support, guidance, and over­ diversity. In this we will be acting upon Resolution 1116(B) Lambeth '98. sight at the request of clergy and congregations that want to continue in the doctrine, discipline and worship of Christ as the Anghcan Church has We will be seeking agreement on and the progressive implementa­ received them. They will actively seek to plant Anglican missions in areas tion of effective measures to ensure a retum to historic standard for ordi­ where there are receptive communities and httle faithful witness in the nation, moral and marriage disciplines where in our communion these Episcopal Church. "We are committed to lead the Church—not leave it," have been notoriously breached. Our endeavor here accords with said Murphy. Lambeth Resolution 1.10. The Archbishops and Bishops agree that this is a Gospel issue, not We are aware that until orthodox Episcopal oversight is restored in a political issue. It is an action to re-establish the unity that has been vio­ all dioceses there will be serious restriction upon mission and acute dif­ lated by the unrebuked ridicule and denial of basic Christian teaching. ficulties in pastoral care. As a clear goal we aim for such resolution. For They are convinced it is time to give the faithful in the US a place to its realization we will take all the measures available consistent with our remain Anghcan. obedience to Christ, submission to the authority of Scripture and accord­ ing to our ordination vows. We seek to share your pain but cannot prom­ This bold initiative is intended to help Arch bishops from around the ise to eliminate it. world take seriously the need for the reform and renewal of the Episcopal Church at their meeting next month in Lisbon, Portugal. We have greatly valued this second consultation. Our representa­ tives have formally visited ECUSA. We see no immediate need for setting The sending of these Bishops back to the United States is offered as up a third consultation on this scale. Be assured of our sharp awareness an interim step in an ongoing effort to lead the Episcopal Church back to of this discord that directly affects our churches as well as yours and our its biblical foundations. determination to find and follow Christ's way ahead. The consecrators were The Most Reverend Emmanuel Kohni, Brothers and sisters pray for us as we do for you. Archbishop of the Province of Rwanda; The Most Reverend Moses Tay, Archbishop of the Province of South East Asia; The Right Reverend John Yours in Christ, Ruchyahana, the Diocese of Shyira in Rwanda. They were assisted by The Right Reverend C. Fitzimmons Allison, the thirteenth Bishop of the The Most Rev E. M. Kolini, Rwanda Diocese of South Carolina, Episcopal Church, USA; The Right Reverend The Most Rev Dr Livingstone Mpalanyi-Nkoyoyo, Uganda Alex D. Dickson, the first Bishop of the Diocese of West Tennessee, The Most Rev Patrice Byankya Njojo, DR Congo Episcopal Church, USA; and The Right Reverend David Pytches, the for­ The Most Rev Samuel Ndayisenga, Burundi mer Bishop of Chile, Bolivia and Peru. The Most Rev Moses Tay, S. E. Asia The Most Rev Donald Mtetemela, Tanzania For further information contact: The Rt. Rev. Charles Murphy, First The Rt Rev Massassel B. Dawidi, representing the Sudan Promise, 843-237-0318, The Rt. Rev. Dr. John Rodgers, Association of The Rt Rev Peter Njenga, representing Kenya Anghcan Congregations on Mission, 847-486-9711. + The Most Rev Maurice Sinclair, Southem Cone of America 2 MANDATE: March/April 2000 The Prayer Book Society 2. Letters from the Presiding Bishop of the ECUSA (a) For the primates of the Anglican Communion My dear brothers: I have been profoundly disturbed by the caricature that has been presented of the Episcopal Church in the United States as being disre­ garding of scripture and the classical doctrines of the church. To be sure there are divergent views on the question of human sexuality which are supported by different readings and interpretations of the biblical texts, but in no way is the biblical record treated as other than the word of God "containing all things necessary to salvation." With regard to doctrine, I know of no active bishops who are other than completely orthodox in their understanding of the creeds. I therefore regard the actions of the primates of Rwanda and South East Asia as singularly unhelpful at a time when we in the Episcopal Church are seeking to upbuild and strengthen our fundamental unity in faith for the sake of mission to a broken and needy world. The enclosed letter is self-explanatory and I wanted you to have a copy of it, particularly as we look ahead to the primates meeting at which time I sincerely hope the intemal hfe of the Episcopal Church will not be the dominant topic of our time together. Let us not be deflect­ ed from the larger concems of genocide, crushing poverty side by side with inordinate affluence, and the dangerous fundamentalism—both within Islam and our own Christian community—which threatens to tum our God of compassion into a idol of wrath. Yours in Christ, The Most Rev. Frank T. Griswold Presiding Bishop and Primate, The Episcopal Church January 31, 2000 (b) For all bishops Dear brothers and sisters: I have just leamed this morning, as perhaps you have as well, that Saturday in Singapore two primates of the Anghcan Communion, the Most Rev. Emmanuel Kohni, Archbishop of the Province of Rwanda, and the Most Rev. Moses Tay, Archbishop of the Province of South East Asia, along with Bishop Ruchyahana also of Rwanda, and two retired bishops of our Province, Alex Dicks on and Fitzsimmons Allison, have ordained two priests of our church, John H. Rodgers and Charles H. Murphy, as bishops. Their press release says that they have "agreed to step forward at this moment of crisis, in an initiative aimed at reversing a 30-year decline of 30 percent in the membership ofthe Episcopal Church in the U.S.A." I am appalled by this irregular action and even more so by the purported "crisis" that has been largely fomented by them and others, and which bears very little resemblance to the church we actually know, which is ahve and well and faithful, as the Zacchaeus report so clearly indicates.
Recommended publications
  • Code Description Start Date End Date A1 Protestant Episcopal Church
    Faith and Belief Codes as of 7/21/2017 Code Description Start Date End Date A1 Protestant Episcopal Church 20170331 A2 Independent Baptist Bible Mission 20170331 A3 Baptist Bible Fellowship 20170331 A4 Ohio Yearly Meeting of Friends 20170331 A5 Kansas Yearly Meeting of Friends 20170331 A6 Anglican Orthodox Church 20170331 A7 Messianic 20170331 AC Advent Christian Church AD Eckankar 20170331 AH Heathen 20170331 AJ Jehovah’s Witnesses AK Korean Evangelical Church of America 20170331 AM Christian Crusade 20170331 AN Native American AO Brethren In Christ Fellowship 20170331 AR American Baptist Convention 20170331 AS Seventh Day Adventists AT Baptist General Conference 20170331 AV Adventist Churches AX Bible Presbyterian Church 20170331 AY Church of The Spiral Tree 20170331 B1 Southern Methodist Church 20170331 B2 Reformed Churches 20170331 B3 Grace Gospel Fellowship 20170331 B4 American Baptist Association 20170331 B5 Congregational Methodist Church 20170331 B6 Conservative Baptist Association of America 20170331 B7 General Conference of the Swedenborgian Church 20170331 B9 Association of Free Lutheran Congregations 20170331 BA American Baptist Churches In USA BB Baptist Churches BC Southern Baptist Convention BE Armenian Apostolic 20170331 BF Free Will Baptist Churches, Other BG General Association of General Baptists BH Fundamental Methodist Church Inc. 20170331 BI United Presbyterian Church In The USA 20170331 BN National Baptist Convention of America BP Progressive National Baptist Convention BR General Association of Regular Baptist
    [Show full text]
  • The Brokenbody Ti-Mbrokenbody
    r f THE BROKENBODY TI-MBROKENBODY an examination, PrePard especially for laymen, of what has happened in &e Episcopal church (PECUSA) in recent years, and what is being done by those determined to keep the Faith. This is not to encourage any exodus from PECUSA but to make possible an intelligent choice by those who do. ...by a Retired Priest INDEX ByWayoflntroduction..... 3 TheGreatEcumenicalGamePlan ..--..- 4 ABackgroundof History ...... 6 TheApostolicSuccession; isitnecessary? .... ... 11 WhatisanAnglo-Catholic?. ....I2 WhatisanEvangelical?.... ....I2 JustWhatDoesOrthodoxMean? .......13 EpiscopiVagantes '..... It ListofQuestions... ....17 ReformedEpiscopalChurch .... .......18 AnglicanOrthodoxChurch '....21 AmericanEpiscopalChurch .....24 AnglicanEpiscopalChurch ......27 AnglicanCatholicChurch '..'..30 Page 3 By Way of Introduction..... This booklet is written especially for the laymen since he rarely has opportunity to read church periodicals for an understanding of what has happened in the Episcopal Church in the past l5 years. To simplify matters we'll hereafter use several acronyms, the first of which is PECUSA (Protestant Episcopal Church in U.S.A.) Most of us are aware that the "troubles" (as the Irish call their revolutionary problems) came to a head at the 1976 Minneapolis General Convention, although there had been departures from PECUSA as far back as 1873. The purpose is to tell you about it without any theological gobbledegook and with as few judgmental comments as possible. The original intent of this project was to describe the origins of the seven better-known separated churches; it was soon discovered that there were neady fifty, most of which are small entities located in the southern states. The search for information showed a lot of cross- patching and cross-referencing, so in order to avoid stumbling all over ourselves we decided to confine this report to the seven.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Millennium Nrms in Britain
    THIRD MILLENNIUM NEW RELIGIOUS MOVEMENTS IN BRITAIN by George D. Chryssides (University of Birmingham, U.K.) A paper presented at the CESNUR 2011 International Conference in Danshui, Taiwan. Please do not quote or reproduce without the consent of the author. Trends in British NRMs At the 2010 CESNUR conference in Torino it was suggested that participants might offer an account of the development of new religious movements (NRMs) in their country from around 1995 to the present day. This presentation explores the development of NRMs in Britain during this period, giving particular attention to the Open Episcopal Church as a case study that raises a variety of questions about the field of NRM studies. In an age of globalisation, it is difficult to write about new religious movements by country. The vast majority of NRMs in Britain are international organisations, and key events in their history have affected the organisation globally rather than nationally. If one considers the main events that have taken place within NRMs, they do not seem to affect Britain any differently from the rest of the world. Most NRMs have an international and not merely a national presence, and hence follow international trends. For example, the Family International and the Jehovah’s Witnesses have undergone substantial restructuring. The changes in the former are more visible to members than the latter: in the case of the Witnesses, the obvious changes relate to the timings of meetings, while The Family International has rescinded its Charter, and has seen a substantial reduction in its community living. The Worldwide Church of God and the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (now the Community of Christ) have become doctrinally more mainstream.
    [Show full text]
  • 53. Presbyteral Transfers and Reinstatements
    53. Presbyteral Transfers and Reinstatements 1. Recommendations of the Ministerial Candidates’ Selection Committee acting as a Transfer Committee The report of the Appeals Committee on applicants who have appealed against the recommendations of the committee under Standing Order 730(10) [see also SO 730(14)] Two cases Report on cases where there have been medical objections No case Applicants for transfer recommended by a 75% majority or more in the Ministerial Candidates’ Selection Committee to be transferred to the jurisdiction of this Conference under SO 730 Barry James Allen (the Methodist Church of Southern Africa) Luiz Fernando Cardoso (the Methodist Church, Brazil) Lynita Conradie (The Methodist Church of Southern Africa) Gyula Ferenc Fiák (Church of the Nazarene) Alan Geoffrey Palmer (Evangelical Fellowship of Congregational Churches) Marian Alexandra Taylor (The Church of England) Nana Banyin Thomford (Anglican Orthodox Church) Jongikaya Zihle (The Methodist Church of Southern Africa) Applicants for transfer as a probationer recommended by a 75% majority or more in the Ministerial Candidates’ Selection Committee to be transferred to the jurisdiction of this Conference under SO 730 Shalome MacNeill Cooper (Probationer (United Church of Canada) Applicants for transfer recommended by a 75% majority or more in the Ministerial Candidates’ Selection Committee to proceed to initial training and probation Sang Wook Han (Jesus Korea Sungkyul Church) Applicants for transfer recommended by a 75% majority or more in the Ministerial Candidates’
    [Show full text]
  • FACT 2005 Congregational Profile
    2005 NATIONAL SURVEY OF CONGREGATIONS CONGREGATIONAL PROFILE Your congregation has been randomly selected to participate in a national study of religion in America. To have a complete picture, we need to hear from every congregation selected. The survey can be completed by the leader of the congregation, a paid staff member, or a lay leader. Some questions may not apply to your religious tradition. If so, just skip the question and go to the next one. Please note that the survey may also be completed on the Internet at http://fact.hartsem.edu/survey Thank you for your willingness to be a part of this important national study. Your Respondent Key In the boxes provided, please write the six-character respondent key printed above your address on your postcard or on your original questionnaire cover. This code will ensure we remove you from our follow-up reminder list. Thank you! A. Your Congregation’s Worship 1. How often does your congregation hold worship services? 1 One day each week 2 More than one day each week 3 Several times a month, but not every week 4 Several times a year 5 Weekly during part of the year (such as summer or ski season) 6 Some other pattern (please describe): 2. How many worship services does your congregation usually hold each weekend? Do not include special services, weddings, or funerals; please write just one number: services 3. How well do the following describe your congregation’s largest weekend worship service? NOT AT QUITE VERY CHECK ONE OPTION ON EACH LINE ALL SLIGHTLY SOMEWHAT WELL WELL A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Process Begins When an Applicant Enters a Recruiters Office and Expresses Interest in Joining the Air Force
    The process begins when an applicant enters a recruiters office and expresses interest in joining the Air Force. To get started the recruiter asks the applicant to complete the SF-86 "Questionnaire for National Security Positions" (OMB Control Number 3206-0005). The recruiter enters the information from the SF-86 into the Air Force Recruiting Information Support System - Total Force (AFRISS-TF). The recruiter then provides the applicant with the Agency Disclosure Notice and Privacy Act Statement for AFRISS-TF (see page 2) then proceeds to complete the remaining fields (see screen shots below). They are either filled out by the recruiter (because they are internal use only) or the recruiter asks the applicant for their responses. The system is logically organized and the tabs flow left to right. OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 0701-0150 OMB EXPIRATION DATE: MM/DD/YYYY AGENCY DISCLOSURE NOTICE The public reporting burden for this collection of information, 0701-0150, is estimated to average 180 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or burden reduction suggestions to the Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, at whs.mc- [email protected]. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT: The following information is provided to comply with the Privacy Act (PL93-579).
    [Show full text]
  • Protestant Episcopal Church the Episcopal Church
    JOURNAL OF THE GENERAL CONVENTION OF THE Protestant Episcopal Church IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA OTHERWISE KNOWN AS The Episcopal Church Held in Seattle, Washington, From September Seventeenth to Twenty-Seventh, inclusive, in the Year of Our Lord 1967 WITH APPENDICES AND SUPPLEMENTS PRINTED FOR THE CONVENTION 1967 ECUMENICAL RELATIONS Appendix 9.1 APPENDIX 9. REPORT OF THE JOINT COMMISSION ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS CONTENTS Introduction 9.3 Members of the Joint Commission 9.4 Structureof the Joint Commission 9.6 The Report 9.7 1. Relations with the Eastern Churches 9.7 2. Relations with the Roman Catholic Church 9.12 3. Consultation on Church Union 9.15 4. Pentecostal and ConservativeEvangelical Churches 9.21 5. World and National Councils of Churches 9.22 6. Jewish-ChristianDialogue 9.23 7. TheologicalConcerns 9.23 8. The Wider Episcopal Fellowship 9.24 9. The West Indies 9.27 10. Ecumenical Relations of the ExecutiveCouncil 9.27 11. Inter-Anglican Relations 9.28 Summary 9.30 Resolutions 9.31 Annexes 9.36 A. Interim Guide-Lines for Anglican-Orthodox Relationships 9.36 B. Resolutionof the BelgradeConference 9.38 C. Interim Guide-Lines for Relations with the Roman Catholic Church 9.42 D. Principles of Church Union 9.45 E. Episcopal Delegatesto EcumenicalGatherings 9.46 F. Statement on Communion Discipline 9.54· G. Financial Report 9.55 9.2 Appendix ECUMENICAL RELATIONS In jIltmoriam Whereas, Ralph W. Black served as a faithful member of the Joint Commission on Ecumenical Relations from 1961 until his death on August 22, 1966; and Whereas, He is mourned, not only by his family and by the Missionary District of North Dakota, but by his friends and fellow-workers throughout the Church; therefore, be it .
    [Show full text]
  • The Certain Trumpet Fall 2011
    The Certain Trumpet (Fall 2011) 1 The Certain Trumpet Fall 2011 by Wallace H. Spaulding THE ATTACK ON SOUTH CAROLINA IS AN ATTACK ON ALL MORAL EPISCOPALIANS UNIDENTIFIED DISSIDENTS within the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina submitted “evidence” to the Disciplinary Board of Bishops in September 2011 which they believe shows that their bishop, the Rt. Rev. Mark J. Lawrence, has “abandoned” the Episcopal Church (TEC). Lawrence is cited most notably for presiding over his diocese’s 2009 convention, which voted to “begin withdrawing from all bodies of the Episcopal Church that have assented to actions contrary to Holy Scripture, the doctrine and worship of Christ as this Church has received them, the resolutions of the Lambeth Conference which have expressed the mind of the Communion, the Book of Common Prayer, and our Constitution and Canons, until such bodies show willingness to repent of such actions.” (The primary issue, of course, is the homosexual agenda and, secondarily, abortion.) The charge does have a certain logic, since, if the General Convention, TEC’s highest legislative body, approves the “gay marriage” proposal to be presented to it in 2012 (as is certainly anticipated), South Carolina might be expected to withdraw from that body. But the implication of this action is horrendous: Any discipline of Bishop Lawrence over the issue would indicate that TEC authorities maintain that one cannot be a TEC member in good standing unless he/she endorses, or at least tolerates, sodomy and abortion. And who has the last word in defining the requirements of church membership, other than these very authorities? What of the other Episcopal dioceses that approve of South Carolina’s stand on these moral issues? They are, first of all, the 5 among the 2004-2008 Anglican Communion Network dioceses that, along with South Carolina, did not go into the new Anglican Church in North America (ACNA) in 2009: Albany, Central Florida, Dallas, Rio Grande, and Springfield (IL).
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Youth Ministry As a Professional Career and the Distinctives of Liberty University Youth Ministry Training in Preparing Students for Youth Work
    LIBERTY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY THE DEVELOPMENT OF YOUTH MINISTRY AS A PROFESSIONAL CAREER AND THE DISTINCTIVES OF LIBERTY UNIVERSITY YOUTH MINISTRY TRAINING IN PREPARING STUDENTS FOR YOUTH WORK A Thesis Project Submitted to Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF MINISTRY By David E. Adams Forest, Virginia March 15, 1993 Copyright 1993 David E. Adams All Rights Reserved LIBERTY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY THESIS APPROVAL SHEET A Grade Mentor Reader ABSTRACT THE DEVELOPMENT OF YOUTH MINISTRY AS A PROFESSIONAL CAREER AND THE DISTINCTIVES OF LIBERTY UNIVERSITY YOUTH MINISTRY TRAINING IN PREPARING STUDENTS FOR YOUTH WORK David E. Adams Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary, 1993 Mentor: Dr.Ronald Hawkins The purpose of this thesis project is to demonstrate that youth ministry is a viable discipline warranting appropriate career consideration for those called into ministry. This project documents the development of the distinctiveness of the Liberty University Youth Major in preparing men and women for youth work. The first part documents the historical roots of youth ministry. Special attention is given to significant events, important personalities and founding youth organizations. Part two reveals how youth ministry became a profession. Ecclesiastical and sociological influences are considered. Section three demonstrates how Liberty University is responding to the need to prepare competent professionals. Total Number of Words: 100 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT iv LIST OF TABLES ix INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 10 PART ONE THE HISTORICAL ROOTS OF YOUTH MINISTRY PROFESSION I. THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF YOUTH MINISTRY 17 Pre-1800 / s Youth Work 17 Revival at Amherst I Dartmouth l Princeton 17 1700/s - Discovering the roots of modern.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Classification System of Religious Groups in the Americas by Major Traditions and Family Types
    LATIN AMERICAN SOCIO-RELIGIOUS STUDIES PROGRAM (PROLADES) TOWARD A CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM OF RELIGIOUS GROUPS IN THE AMERICAS BY MAJOR TRADITIONS AND FAMILY TYPES Clifton L. Holland, Editor First Edition: 30 October 1993 Last Modified on 20 April 2010 PROLADES Apartado 1524-2050, San Pedro, Costa Rica Telephone: (506) 283-8300; Fax (506) 234-7682 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.prolades.com © Clifton L. Holland 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 PROLADES Apartado 1524-2050 San José, Costa Rica All Rights Reserved 2 CONTENTS 1. Document #1: Toward a Classification System of Religious Groups in the Americas by Major Traditions and Family Types 7 2. Document #2: An Annotated Outline of the Classification System of Religious Groups by Major Traditions, Families and Sub-Families with Special Reference to the Americas 15 PART A: THE OLDER LITURGICAL CHRISTIAN TRADITIONS 15 A1.0 EASTERN LITURGICAL TRADITIONS 15 A1.10 EASTERN OTHODOX TRADITION 15 A1.11 Patriarchates 16 A1.12 Autocephalous Orthodox Churches 16 A1.13 Other Orthodox Churches in the Americas 17 A1.14 Schismatic Groups of Eastern Orthodox Origins 18 A1.20 NON-CALCEDONIAN ORTHODOX TRADITION 18 A1.21 Nestorian Family – Church of the East 18 A1.22 Monophysite Family 19 A1.23 Coptic Church Family 19 A1.30 INTRA-FAITH ORTHODOX ORGANIZATIONS 20 A2.0 WESTERN LITURGICAL TRADITION 20 A2.1 Roman Catholic Church 21 A2.2 Religious Orders of the Roman Catholic Church 21 A2.3 Autonomous Orthodox Churches in communion with the Vatican 21 A2.4 Old Catholic Church Movement 23 A2.5 Other
    [Show full text]
  • Faith and Belief Codes
    Faith and Belief Codes as of 7/21/2017 Code Description Start Date End Date A1 Protestant Episcopal Church 20170331 A2 Independent Baptist Bible Mission 20170331 A3 Baptist Bible Fellowship 20170331 A4 Ohio Yearly Meeting of Friends 20170331 A5 Kansas Yearly Meeting of Friends 20170331 A6 Anglican Orthodox Church 20170331 A7 Messianic 20170331 AC Advent Christian Church AD Eckankar 20170331 AH Heathen 20170331 AJ Jehovah’s Witnesses AK Korean Evangelical Church of America 20170331 AM Christian Crusade 20170331 AN Native American AO Brethren In Christ Fellowship 20170331 AR American Baptist Convention 20170331 AS Seventh Day Adventists AT Baptist General Conference 20170331 AV Adventist Churches AX Bible Presbyterian Church 20170331 AY Church of The Spiral Tree 20170331 B1 Southern Methodist Church 20170331 B2 Reformed Churches 20170331 B3 Grace Gospel Fellowship 20170331 B4 American Baptist Association 20170331 B5 Congregational Methodist Church 20170331 B6 Conservative Baptist Association of America 20170331 B7 General Conference of the Swedenborgian Church 20170331 B9 Association of Free Lutheran Congregations 20170331 BA American Baptist Churches In USA BB Baptist Churches BC Southern Baptist Convention BE Armenian Apostolic 20170331 BF Free Will Baptist Churches, Other BG General Association of General Baptists BH Fundamental Methodist Church Inc. 20170331 BI United Presbyterian Church In The USA 20170331 BN National Baptist Convention of America BP Progressive National Baptist Convention BR General Association of Regular Baptist
    [Show full text]
  • QUESTIONNAIRE May 30, 2014
    1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER PEW RESEARCH CENTER 2014 RELIGIOUS LANDSCAPE STUDY (RLS-II) MAIN SURVEY OF NATIONALLY REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE OF ADULTS FINAL QUESTIONNAIRE May 30, 2014 NOTE: THIS DOCUMENT INCLUDES QUESTIONS THAT WERE RELEASED AS PART OF THE FIRST OR SECOND REPORTS ON THE FINDINGS OF THE RELIGIOUS LANDSCAPE STUDY, THOSE RELEASED AS PART OF “RELIGION IN EVERYDAY LIFE” AND THOSE RELEASED AS PART OF “ONE-IN-FIVE U.S. ADULTS WERE RAISED IN INTERFAITH HOMES.” SOME QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN HELD FOR FUTURE RELEASE, AS INDICATED BELOW. Guide to questions on the RLS-II interactive website: An interactive website was released in conjunction with the Religious Landscape Study reports. The list below shows which questions can be analyzed using the website and what short description the website used for each question. Short Description on Website Question number Age AGE Generation AGE Gender SEX Race and Ethnicity HISP, RACE Immigration Status Q.P2, Q.P6, Q.P7 Income INCOME Education EDUC Marital Status MARITAL Parental Status CHILDREN Belief in God Q.G1, Q.G1b Importance of Religion Q.F2 Attendance at Religious Services ATTEND Prayer Frequency Q.I1 Prayer Groups Q.I2a Meditation Q.I2c Feelings of Spiritual Well-Being Q.I4a Feelings of Sense of Wonder Q.I4b Guidance on Right and Wrong Q.B31 Standards for Right and Wrong Q.B2d Reading Scripture Q.I2b Interpretation of Scripture Q.G7, Q.G7b Belief in Heaven Q.G5 Belief in Hell Q.G6 Political Party PARTY, PARTYLN Political Ideology IDEO Size of Government Q.B20 Government Aid to the Poor Q.B2b Abortion Q.B21 Homosexuality Q.B2a Same-Sex Marriage Q.B22 Protecting the Environment Q.B2c Human Evolution Q.B30, Q.B30b www.pewresearch.org 2 PEW RESEARCH CENTER Full text of question wording: LANDLINE INTRO: Hello, I am _____ calling on behalf of the Pew Research Center.
    [Show full text]