DOCSLIB.ORG

4.1. Aristophanes and His Works (TT 1-5)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4.1. Aristophanes and His Works (TT 1-5) 4. Aristophanes of Boiotia SALVATORE TUFANO – Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma [email protected] 4.1. Aristophanes and His Works (TT 1-5) T 1 (= BNJ 379 T 1; FGrHist 379 T 1; cp. F 5 [Plut. De Hdt. mal. 31.864D]).683 Ἀριστοφάνους […] τοῦ Βοιωτοῦ “Aristophanes [...] of Boiotia”. T 2 (= BNJ 379 T 2b; EGM I T 1A; cp. F 6 [Plut. De Hdt. mal. 33.866F-867A]). ὡς Ἀριστοφάνης ἐκ τῶν κατ᾽ ἄρχοντας ὑποµνηµάτων ἱστόρησε “As Aristophanes retold, from the public records organized through the yearly archons” (tr. S. Tufano) T 3 (= BNJ 379 T 2a; FGrHist 379 T 2; cp. F 2 [Steph. Byz. α 330, s.v. ἀντικονδυλεῖς]). Ἀριστοφάνης ὁ τοὺς Θηβαίους ὥρους γεγραφώς “Aristophanes, author of Theban Annals”. 683 Since these witnesses actually belong to the fragments, I comment on the textual problems in the commentary on the single fragments. Salvatore Tufano. Boiotia from Within. Teiresias Supplements Online, Volume 2. 2019. © Salvatore Tufano 2019. License Agreement: CC-BY-NC (permission to use, distribute, and reproduce in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed and not used for commercial purposes). Tufano, Boiotia from Within – 4. Aristophanes T 4 (= EGM I F 1A; cp. F 1 [POxy. 2463, ll. 14-16]). Ἀριστοφάνης δ’[ἐν| τῆι α΄ {πρώτῃ} τῶν Βοι[ωτι-| κῶν πρώτῃ del. Fowler “Aristophanes, in the first book of his Boiotian Histories”. T 5 (= EGM I F 2; cp. F 3 [Suda ο 275, s.v. Ὁµολώϊος (= Phot. Lex. (g, z) ο 298 (III 82 Theodoridis)]). Ἀριστοφάνης ἐν β’ Θηβαϊκῶν ὁ Phot. ὡς Suda Ἀριστόδηµος Reines “Aristophanes, in the second book of his Theban Histories”. 4.1.1. Title The titles of Boiotian local historiography present problems that go beyond common doubts concerning the transmitted titles of any Classical historian: as with many other authors only transmitted in fragments, we lack certain information on many of the names of the genre.684 The parallel case of Hellanikos is paradigmatic, because the debate on the possibility that he could assign the title Ἀτθίς685 to his local history of Athens demonstrates the hardships of accepting that the same title Βοιωτικά (F 2) could be the original one.686 Aristophanes certainly wrote after Herodotus, since in the fragment (5) he comments on the arrival of Herodotus in Thebes. This tradition does not explicitly allow us, however, to 684 Cp. 1.3 for a summary of the (poor) knowledge we have on the biographies of the authors, discussed in the present book. 685 Cp. e.g. Nicolai 2010, on the possibility that Hellanikos’ works did not have specific titles, and Ottone 2010, according to whom the Athenian history of Hellanikos originally had the title Ἀττικὸς λόγος. 686 On the specific problem of the early development of Boiotian historiography, see supra 1.2.1. 190 Tufano, Boiotia from Within – 4. Aristophanes claim that Aristophanes was sensibly later than the author of the Histories. A prudent positioning between the end of the fifth century BCE and the beginning of the later century places Aristophanes in a moment when there was an early circulation of books and an incipient habit to assign a title to a literary work.687 Consequently, it is possible that Aristophanes was responsible for assigning a title to his output. The second problem to address is the variety of titles that are transmitted to describe the specific book where a tradition held by Aristophanes was retold. Two opposing stances have been taken, one which reduces the variety of the transmitted titles to two main works, namely the Θηβαῖοι Ὧροι (T 3), and a more generic work on Boiotia, titled Βοιωτικά / Θηβαϊκά (TT 4-5).688 The other assumes that the four known titles (T 2: Κατ᾽ἄρχοντας ὑποµνήµατα; T 3: Θηβαῖοι Ὧροι; T 4: Βοιωτικά; T 5: Θηβαϊκά) may be the result of pure invention or confusion in our sources: no possible conclusion on this detail, as a consequence, might be reached.689 In order to reconsider which option might be more probable, we will now shortly reflect on what has been generally transmitted in the tradition of the horoi and of the hypomnemata. In other words, it is useful to ponder whether the general picture which emerges from the titles transmitted under these titles may apply to the content of the fragments of Aristophanes. The identification of local historiography with horography was first suggested by Jacoby (1909): by assuming that local historiography could coincide with a narrative based on local annals (horoi), he implied that all local histories generally follow a constant annalistic framework. Such a theory, however, might be profoundly misleading, as scholars like von Fritz (1967 I: 97) have shown how the first local histories did not always depend on a political or evenemential plan: they could follow other internal criteria, relevant to their respective audiences, as is maintained in our present study. Further chronographical studies confirm the relevance of this distinction and the importance of the geographic area that was the object of the local history.690 Today, an immediate correlation between titles like Ὧροι and an annalistic partition is generally refused. 687 Schmalzriedt 1970. 688 Cp. Fowler 2000: 54. 689 Despite a preference for the first scenario (two works), Fowler (2000: xxxv) refers to a “confusion of titles.” 690 Cp. Tober 2017 on the role of the local audience and infra 7.1 on this debate. 191 Tufano, Boiotia from Within – 4. Aristophanes Local historiographical works, in fact, were often organized according to other criteria or the interests of the author.691 The chronological partition is not therefore a criterion upon which we can assess the relationship between local and universal history, in general. As Jacoby (1949: 68) said, the first one should be better understood as “that species of Greek historical writing, which we call Local Chronicle or better with a more comprehensive expression Local History” (my italics). On these grounds, the title itself, then, might not be enough to infer anything on the content of a work, and the existence of a title (Theban) “Horoi” could be the simple assumption of ancient scholarship. However, in the specific case of Aristophanes, the title Horoi finds more support in our witnesses. Our sources on his framework stress the fact that he followed the events kat’archontas (even when the title is surprisingly broader, as in the case of hypomnema). We then need to seriously consider that this memory of the title Horoi was more than an easy label for this specifically local historian. Whereas, in the beginning, Ὧροι mostly referred to works written in the Ionic world,692 Diodorus Siculus (1.26.5) was also aware that a further specification might be necessary: he feels the need to clarify that only “yearly chronicles” (αἱ κατ’ἔτος ἀναγραφαί) can be called ὡρογραφίαι.693 Despite, then, Plutarch’s generic definition of ὡρογράφοι as all the local historians of Naxos,694 the witnesses on Aristophanes, and the overall development of the title Horoi, concur to suggest that, in this specific case, Aristophanes may have followed an annalistic framework (cp. F 6, on the possibility of the mention of an eponymous archon). This annalistic framework was denied by Chaniotis (1988: 193 n.414), who thought that the hypomnemata (T 2; cp. Plut. Sol. 11.2) were the “Akten der Beamten”, i.e. official 691 Chronographical studies: Möller 2001. See e.g. Fowler 1996: 66 and n.28, for the mandatory caution to pay, before dismissing any possibility that these local histories were used by Herodotus. On the annalistic partition of the genre, see also supra 1.2.3. See Thomas 2014b: 160-2 for examples of the other criteria of local historiography. 692 Cp. Laquer (1926) on the origin of Greek local historiography from oral mythical traditions reported by the hexegetai, and from annalistic records from Ionia. Thomas 2014b: 164-5 concentrates on the political meaning of these works, where the foundation myths point out and stress their Greek origins. 693 Following this technical interpretation, only “horographies” suggest a stricly annalistic framework (Thomas 2014b: 150). On the Σαµίων Ὧροι of Duris, see Landucci 1997: 205-6; Pownall 2009 ad BNJ 76 F 22; Thomas 2014b: 155-6. On local historiography and the use of the title “Ὧροι”, see Thomas 2019: 36-8. 694 Plut. de Hdt. mal. 36.869A. Even in this case, nothing speaks against the possibility that these Naxian writers also adopted an annalistic model (Thomas 2014b: 155). 192 Tufano, Boiotia from Within – 4. Aristophanes documents, probably fictitious, in light of the partisanship of Aristophanes (ibd. 207). Nevertheless, the syntagm τὰ κατ᾽ ἄρχοντας ὑποµνηµάτα is a good periphrasis for Ὧροι, as Schachter (2012b ad BNJ 379 T 2b) observed, since it reduces the vagueness of ὑπόµνηµα and allows us to reject that they were simply notes or official documents. In fact, there is at least one meaningful parallel, the inscription of Sosthenes on Paros, whose first block (A 1 = BNJ 502 F 1) mentions the historical activity of Demeas. This figure mentioned other sources and events of the life of Archilochus, even if his work was generally open to myths and “non-political” subjects: the inscription says that Demeas “wrote archon by archon, and began from the first archon” (A1 ll. 8-9: κατ[᾽ἄρχοντα]/ ἕκαστον καὶ ἦρκται ἀπὸ ἄρχοντος πρῶτον).695 The ὑποµνήµατα can also mean, from the Hellenistic period, the “Archive von Höfen und öffentlichen Behörden”.696 The public sense and official aura coexist with the more general meaning of notes and private drafts (just like the Latin parallel commentarius). Plutarch’s passage on Aristophanes (T 2), as a consequence, may be more than a punctual autoschediasm of the title of the work, since it can also shed light on the potential use of sources of an archival nature, like the chronicles (Horoi).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HOMERIC-ILIAD.Pdf
    Homeric Iliad Translated by Samuel Butler Revised by Soo-Young Kim, Kelly McCray, Gregory Nagy, and Timothy Power Contents Rhapsody 1 Rhapsody 2 Rhapsody 3 Rhapsody 4 Rhapsody 5 Rhapsody 6 Rhapsody 7 Rhapsody 8 Rhapsody 9 Rhapsody 10 Rhapsody 11 Rhapsody 12 Rhapsody 13 Rhapsody 14 Rhapsody 15 Rhapsody 16 Rhapsody 17 Rhapsody 18 Rhapsody 19 Rhapsody 20 Rhapsody 21 Rhapsody 22 Rhapsody 23 Rhapsody 24 Homeric Iliad Rhapsody 1 Translated by Samuel Butler Revised by Soo-Young Kim, Kelly McCray, Gregory Nagy, and Timothy Power [1] Anger [mēnis], goddess, sing it, of Achilles, son of Peleus— 2 disastrous [oulomenē] anger that made countless pains [algea] for the Achaeans, 3 and many steadfast lives [psūkhai] it drove down to Hādēs, 4 heroes’ lives, but their bodies it made prizes for dogs [5] and for all birds, and the Will of Zeus was reaching its fulfillment [telos]— 6 sing starting from the point where the two—I now see it—first had a falling out, engaging in strife [eris], 7 I mean, [Agamemnon] the son of Atreus, lord of men, and radiant Achilles. 8 So, which one of the gods was it who impelled the two to fight with each other in strife [eris]? 9 It was [Apollo] the son of Leto and of Zeus. For he [= Apollo], infuriated at the king [= Agamemnon], [10] caused an evil disease to arise throughout the mass of warriors, and the people were getting destroyed, because the son of Atreus had dishonored Khrysēs his priest. Now Khrysēs had come to the ships of the Achaeans to free his daughter, and had brought with him a great ransom [apoina]: moreover he bore in his hand the scepter of Apollo wreathed with a suppliant’s wreath [15] and he besought the Achaeans, but most of all the two sons of Atreus, who were their chiefs.
    [Show full text]
  • Marginalia and Commentaries in the Papyri of Euripides, Sophocles and Aristophanes
    Nikolaos Athanassiou Marginalia and Commentaries in the Papyri of Euripides, Sophocles and Aristophanes PhD thesis / Dept. of Greek and Latin University College London London 1999 C Name of candidate: Nikolaos Athanassiou Title of Thesis: Marginalia and commentaries in the papyri of Euripides, Sophocles and Aristophanes. The purpose of the thesis is to examine a selection of papyri from the large corpus of Euripides, Sophocles and Aristophanes. The study of the texts has been divided into three major chapters where each one of the selected papyri is first reproduced and then discussed. The transcription follows the original publication whereas any possible textual improvement is included in the commentary. The commentary also contains a general description of the papyrus (date, layout and content) as well reference to special characteristics. The structure of the commentary is not identical for marginalia and hy-pomnemata: the former are examined in relation to their position round the main text and are treated both as individual notes and as a group conveying the annotator's aims. The latter are examined lemma by lemma with more emphasis upon their origins and later appearances in scholia and lexica. After the study of the papyri follows an essay which summarizes the results and tries to incorporate them into the wider context of the history of the text of each author and the scholarly attention that this received by the Alexandrian scholars or later grammarians. The main effort is to place each papyrus into one of the various stages that scholarly exegesis passed especially in late antiquity. Special treatment has been given to P.Wurzburg 1, the importance of which made it necessary that it occupies a chapter by itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Kretan Cult and Customs, Especially in the Classical and Hellenistic Periods: a Religious, Social, and Political Study
    i Kretan cult and customs, especially in the Classical and Hellenistic periods: a religious, social, and political study Thesis submitted for degree of MPhil Carolyn Schofield University College London ii Declaration I, Carolyn Schofield, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been acknowledged in the thesis. iii Abstract Ancient Krete perceived itself, and was perceived from outside, as rather different from the rest of Greece, particularly with respect to religion, social structure, and laws. The purpose of the thesis is to explore the bases for these perceptions and their accuracy. Krete’s self-perception is examined in the light of the account of Diodoros Siculus (Book 5, 64-80, allegedly based on Kretan sources), backed up by inscriptions and archaeology, while outside perceptions are derived mainly from other literary sources, including, inter alia, Homer, Strabo, Plato and Aristotle, Herodotos and Polybios; in both cases making reference also to the fragments and testimonia of ancient historians of Krete. While the main cult-epithets of Zeus on Krete – Diktaios, associated with pre-Greek inhabitants of eastern Krete, Idatas, associated with Dorian settlers, and Kretagenes, the symbol of the Hellenistic koinon - are almost unique to the island, those of Apollo are not, but there is good reason to believe that both Delphinios and Pythios originated on Krete, and evidence too that the Eleusinian Mysteries and Orphic and Dionysiac rites had much in common with early Kretan practice. The early institutionalization of pederasty, and the abduction of boys described by Ephoros, are unique to Krete, but the latter is distinct from rites of initiation to manhood, which continued later on Krete than elsewhere, and were associated with different gods.
    [Show full text]
  • Statius; with an English Translation by J.H. Mozley
    THE LOEB CLASSICAL LIBRARY EDITED BY T. E. PAGE, LiTT.D. E. CAPPS, PH.D., LL.D. W. H. D. ROUSE, litt.d. STATIUS II ^cfi STATIUS f WITH AN ENGLISH TRANSLATION BY J. H. MOZLEY, M.A. SOMETIME SCHOLAR OF KING S COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE USCTDEER IN CLASSICS AT EAST LONDON COLLEGE, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON IN TWO VOLUMES J.^ II THEBAID V-XII • ACHILLEID LONDON : WILLIAM HEINEMANN LTD NEW YORK: G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS MCMXXVIII ; Printed in Great Britain CONTENTS OF VOLUME II THEBAID BOOKS V-XII VOL. 11 THEBAIDOS LIBER V Pulsa sitis fluvio, populataque gurgitis altum^ agmina linquebant ripas amnemque minorem ; acrior et campum sonipes rapit et pedes arva implet ovans, rediere viris animique minaeque votaque, sanguineis mixtum ceu fontibus ignem 5 hausissent belli magnasque in proelia mentes. dispositi in turmas rursus legemque severi ordinis, ut cuique ante locus ductorque, monentur instaurare vias. tellus iam pulvere primo crescit, et armorum transmittunt fulgura silvae. 10 qualia trans pontum Phariis depvensa serenis rauca Paraetonio deeedunt agmina Nilo, quo^ fera cogit hiemps : illae clangore fugaei, umbra fretis arvisque, volant, sonat avius aether, iam Borean imbresque pati, iam nare solutis 15 amnibus et nudo iuvat aestivare sub Haemo. Hie rursus simili procerum vallante corona dux Talaionides, antiqua ut forte sub orno ^ altum P : alvum w (Z) mith alveum written over). ^ quo Vollmer : cum Pa,-. " i.e., cranes, cf. Virg. Aen. x. 264.. * The epithet is taken from a town named Paraetonium, on the Libyan coast west of the Delta. 2 THEBAID BOOK V Their thirst was quenched by the river, and the army haWng ravaged the water's depths was lea\"ing the banks and the diminished stream ; more briskly now the galloping steed scours the plain, and the infantrj' swarm exultant over the fields, inspired once more by courage and hope and warlike temper, as though from the blood-stained springs they had drunk the fire of battle and high resolution for the fray.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Studies on the Scholia to Euripides
    Preliminary Studies on the Scholia to Euripides CALIFORNIA CLASSICAL STUDIES NUMBER 6 Editorial Board Chair: Donald Mastronarde Editorial Board: Alessandro Barchiesi, Todd Hickey, Emily Mackil, Richard Martin, Robert Morstein-Marx, J. Theodore Peña, Kim Shelton California Classical Studies publishes peer-reviewed long-form scholarship with online open access and print-on-demand availability. The primary aim of the series is to disseminate basic research (editing and analysis of primary materials both textual and physical), data-heavy re- search, and highly specialized research of the kind that is either hard to place with the leading publishers in Classics or extremely expensive for libraries and individuals when produced by a leading academic publisher. In addition to promoting archaeological publications, papyrologi- cal and epigraphic studies, technical textual studies, and the like, the series will also produce selected titles of a more general profile. The startup phase of this project (2013–2017) is supported by a grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Also in the series: Number 1: Leslie Kurke, The Traffic in Praise: Pindar and the Poetics of Social Economy, 2013 Number 2: Edward Courtney, A Commentary on the Satires of Juvenal, 2013 Number 3: Mark Griffith, Greek Satyr Play: Five Studies, 2015 Number 4: Mirjam Kotwick, Alexander of Aphrodisias and the Text of Aristotle’s Metaphys- ics, 2016 Number 5: Joey Williams, The Archaeology of Roman Surveillance in the Central Alentejo, Portugal, 2017 PRELIMINARY STUDIES ON THE SCHOLIA TO EURIPIDES Donald J. Mastronarde CALIFORNIA CLASSICAL STUDIES Berkeley, California © 2017 by Donald J. Mastronarde. California Classical Studies c/o Department of Classics University of California Berkeley, California 94720–2520 USA http://calclassicalstudies.org email: [email protected] ISBN 9781939926104 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017916025 CONTENTS Preface vii Acknowledgments xi Abbreviations xiii Sigla for Manuscripts of Euripides xvii List of Plates xxix 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Pausanias' Description of Greece
    BONN'S CLASSICAL LIBRARY. PAUSANIAS' DESCRIPTION OF GREECE. PAUSANIAS' TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH \VITTI NOTES AXD IXDEX BY ARTHUR RICHARD SHILLETO, M.A., Soiiii'tinie Scholar of Trinity L'olltge, Cambridge. VOLUME IT. " ni <le Fnusnnias cst un homme (jui ne mnnquo ni de bon sens inoins a st-s tlioux." hnniie t'oi. inais i}iii rn>it ou au voudrait croire ( 'HAMTAiiNT. : ftEOROE BELL AND SONS. YOUK STIIKKT. COVKNT (iAKDKX. 188t). CHISWICK PRESS \ C. WHITTINGHAM AND CO., TOOKS COURT, CHANCEKV LANE. fA LC >. iV \Q V.2- CONTEXTS. PAGE Book VII. ACHAIA 1 VIII. ARCADIA .61 IX. BtEOTIA 151 -'19 X. PHOCIS . ERRATA. " " " Volume I. Page 8, line 37, for Atte read Attes." As vii. 17. 2<i. (Catullus' Aft is.) ' " Page 150, line '22, for Auxesias" read Anxesia." A.-> ii. 32. " " Page 165, lines 12, 17, 24, for Philhammon read " Philanimon.'' " " '' Page 191, line 4, for Tamagra read Tanagra." " " Pa ire 215, linu 35, for Ye now enter" read Enter ye now." ' " li I'aijf -J27, line 5, for the Little Iliad read The Little Iliad.'- " " " Page ^S9, line 18, for the Babylonians read Babylon.'' " 7 ' Volume II. Page 61, last line, for earth' read Earth." " Page 1)5, line 9, tor "Can-lira'" read Camirus." ' ; " " v 1'age 1 69, line 1 , for and read for. line 2, for "other kinds of flutes "read "other thites.'' ;< " " Page 201, line 9. for Lacenian read Laeonian." " " " line 10, for Chilon read Cliilo." As iii. 1H. Pago 264, " " ' Page 2G8, Note, for I iad read Iliad." PAUSANIAS. BOOK VII. ACIIAIA.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Reception in Contemporary Women's
    CLASSICAL RECEPTION IN CONTEMPORARY WOMEN’S WRITING: EMERGING STRATEGIES FROM RESISTANCE TO INDETERMINACY by POLLY STOKER A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Classics, Ancient History, and Archaeology School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham April 2019 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The reader who rewrites remains a vital interlocutor between the classical past and the modern classicist. However, the neglect of the female reader in classical reception studies is an omission that becomes ever more conspicuous, and surely less sustainable, as women writers continue to dominate the contemporary creative field. This thesis makes the first steps towards fashioning a new aesthetic model for the female reader based on irony, ambivalence, and indeterminacy. I consider works by Virginia Woolf, Alice Oswald, Elizabeth Cook, and Yael Farber, all of whom largely abandon ‘resistance’ as a strategy of rereading and demand a new theoretical framework that can engage with and recognize the multivalence of women’s reading and rewriting.
    [Show full text]
  • Homer's Iliad: a Discussion Guide
    Homer’s Iliad: A Discussion Guide By David Bruce SMASHWORDS EDITION Copyright 2013 by Bruce D. Bruce Thank you for downloading this book. You are welcome to share it with your friends. This book may be reproduced, copied and distributed for non-commercial purposes, provided the book remains in its complete original form. If you enjoyed this book, please return to Smashwords.com to discover other works by this author. Thank you for your support. Preface The purpose of this book is educational. I have read, studied and taught Homer’s Iliad, and I wish to pass on what I have learned to other people who are interested in studying Homer’s Iliad. In particular, I think that the readers of this introduction to Homer’s Iliad will be bright high school seniors and college first-year students, as well as intelligent adults who simply wish to study the Iliad despite not being literature majors. This book uses a question-and-answer format. It poses, then answers, relevant questions about Homer, background information, and the Iliad. This book goes through the Iliad book by book. I recommend that you read the relevant section of the Iliad, then read my comments, then go back and re-read the relevant section of the Iliad. However, do what works for you. Teachers may find this book useful as a discussion guide for the epic poem. Teachers can have students read books from the epic poem, then teachers can ask students selected questions from this study guide. It helps to know something about Homer’s Odyssey, Virgil’s Aeneid, Greek and Roman mythology, and Ovid’s Metamorphoses, but this background reading is not strictly necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • The Histories
    Place Names Latitude Longitude Numbers of Times Mentioned Adriatic Sea 42.7752864 15.885196 3 Paphos 34.757212 32.406593 1 Oaxos 35.3080415 24.8441326 2 Petra 35.25 26.25 2 Siphnus 35.208535 26.108246 4 Abae 38.5831615 22.929852 5 Abdera 40.93950935 24.9795992 13 Abydos 26.409131 31.91627145 18 Acarnania 38.71765475 21.19036225 2 Achaia 38.10212147 22.22458591 8 Achelous river 38.3388321 21.1067111 3 Acheron river 39.2348296 20.4831346 2 Achilleum 39.914982 26.1511315 1 Achilles 46.5 31.5 1 Pyrene 42.468926 2.866662 1 Adramytteum 39.5023635 26.936321 1 Aegaen Sea 37.44094966 25.85418454 9 Aegina island 37.7409397 23.430141 51 Egyptian sea 31.15802 32.68554 1 Egypt 19.21140877 30.56732963 263 Aeolia 38.84644288 26.95080175 2 Ethiopia 14.125005 38.721522 22 Aetolia 38.51650426 21.75966982 1 Agathyrsi 47.5 27.5 11 Agora 40.513545 26.786353 1 Aegae 38.154879 22.314637 2 Aegaleos Mountain 37.154 21.721 1 Aege 39.978627 23.666064 1 Aegira 38.1297925 22.377887 1 Aegilea island 38.1771519 24.1749085 2 Aegion 38.252707 22.081952 1 Aenea 40.439481 22.879124 2 Aenus 40.7248985 26.085729 2 Aenyra 40.683333 24.65 1 Aesa 40.309275 23.060368 1 Acanthus 40.39975 23.880112 8 Acragas 37.29289215 13.58945448 4 Acrothoum 38.4526062 23.2197021 1 Akrothooi 40.183833 24.34933 1 Alabanda 37.59557847 27.97571613 2 Alalia 42.10240033 9.511828 2 Alopecae 37.95 23.749997 1 Alpeni 38.801852 22.586084 4 Amathus 34.712264 33.13708095 3 Ampelus headland 37.75 26.75 2 Amphicaea 38.642319 22.598214 1 Amphissa 38.518403 22.374172 2 Anagyrous 37.8300155 23.804843 1 Anaphlystus
    [Show full text]
  • SCHOLIA, COMMENTARIES, and LEXICA on SPECIFIC LITERARY WORKS 2 Scholia, Commentaries, and Lexica on Specific Literary Works
    18 SCHOLIA, COMMENTARIES, AND LEXICA ON SPECIFIC LITERARY WORKS 2 Scholia, Commentaries, and Lexica on Specific Literary Works 2.1 ARCHAIC AND CLASSICAL POETRY This category includes the most famous and most often cited scholia. By far the most important are the Homer scholia, but those on Pindar and the Attic drama- tists are also significant. 2.1.1 Homer Ancient scholarship on Homer was extensive and of high quality, for the best scholars of antiquity devoted much of their time and energy to the Homeric poems. Work on Homer that could be described as scholarship goes back at least to the classical period and probably to the sixth century bc, and editing the text of Homer was one of the main tasks of the first Alexandrian scholars. Zenodotus, Aristophanes of Byzantium, and Aristarchus probably all produced editions of the Iliad and Odyssey, and Aristarchus wrote extensive commentaries, while Zenodotus and Aristophanes compiled glossaries of primarily Homeric words. In addition, the early and persistent use of Homer as a school text meant that there was a tradi- tion of school exegesis that reached back as far as the classical period. Though none of the very early work on Homer survives in its original form, a surprising amount is preserved in various later compilations, so we often know, for example, the read- ings of several different Alexandrian scholars for a particular passage, and even some of the arguments behind these readings (although the arguments preserved in later sources cannot always be assumed to be those of the editor himself). Two principal sources for the ancient scholarship on Homer survive: the scholia and Eustathius’ commentaries, both of which are gigantic works filling many vol- umes in modern editions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Two Voices of Statius: Patronymics in the Thebaid
    The Two Voices of Statius: Patronymics in the Thebaid. Kyle Conrau-Lewis This thesis is submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts School of Historical and Philosophical Studies University of Melbourne, November 2013. 1 This is to certify that: 1. the thesis comprises only my original work towards the degree of master of arts except where indicated in the Preface, 2. due acknowledgement has been made in the text to all other material used, 3. the thesis is less than 50,000 words in length, exclusive of tables, maps, bibliographies and appendices. 2 Contents Abstract 4 Introduction 5 Chapter 1 24 Chapter 2 53 Chapter 3 87 Conclusion 114 Appendix A 117 Bibliography 121 3 Abstract: This thesis aims to explore the divergent meanings of patronymics in Statius' epic poem, the Thebaid. Statius' use of language has often been characterised as recherché, mannered and allusive and his style is often associated with Alexandrian poetic practice. For this reason, Statius' use of patronymics may be overlooked by commentators as an example of learned obscurantism and deliberate literary self- fashioning as a doctus poeta. In my thesis, I argue that Statius' use of patronymics reflects a tension within the poem about the role and value of genealogy. At times genealogy is an ennobling feature of the hero, affirming his military command or royal authority. At other times, a lineage is perverse as Statius repeatedly plays on the tragedy of generational stigma and the liability of paternity. Sometimes, Statius points to the failure of the son to match the character of his father, and other times he presents characters without fathers and this has implications for how these characters are to be interpreted.
    [Show full text]
  • Sing, Goddess, Achilles' Rage, Black and Murderous, That Cost The
    ILIAD ILIAD BOOK 1 RAGE: Sing, Goddess, Achilles' rage, Black and murderous, that cost the Greeks Incalculable pain, pitched countless souls Of heroes into Hades' dark, And left their bodies to rot as feasts For dogs and birds, as Zeus' will was done. Begin with the clash between Agamemnon— The Greek warlord—and godlike Achilles. Which of the immortals set these two At each other's throats? 10 APOLLO, Zeus' son and Leto's, offended By the warlord. Agamemnon had dishonored Chryses, Apollo's priest, so the god Struck the Greek camp with plague, And the soldiers were dying of it. Chryses Had come to the Greek beachhead camp BOOK 1 Hauling a fortune for his daughter's ransom. Displaying Apollo's sacral ribbons On a golden staff, he made a formal plea 20 To the entire Greek army, but especially The commanders, Atreus' two sons: "Sons of Atreus and Greek heroes all: May the gods on Olympus grant you plunder Of Priam's city and a safe return home. But give me my daughter back and accept This ransom out of respect for Zeus' son, Lord Apollo, who deals death from afar." A murmur rippled through the ranks: "Respect the priest and take the ransom." 30 But Agamemnon was not pleased And dismissed Chryses with a rough speech: "Don't let me ever catch you, old man, by these ships again, Skulking around now or sneaking back later. The god's staff and ribbons won't save you next time. The girl is mine, and she'll be an old woman in Argos Before I let her go, working the loom in my house And coming to my bed, far from her homeland.
    [Show full text]