Indian Journal of Geo Marine Sciences Vol. 46 (06), June 2017, pp. 1116-1127 Diversity and enzymatic profile of bacterial flora in the gut of an estuarine fish, Mugil jerdoni Ankita A. Datta, Amit K. Sharma, Rahul Kundu & Satya P. Singh* UGC-CAS Department of Biosciences, Saurashtra University, Rajkot 360 005, India *[E-mail:
[email protected]] Received 12 August 2015 ; revised 07 December 2015 In order to examine the bacterial diversity and enzymatic potential, the isolates were screened for the amylolytic, cellulolytic, lipolytic and proteolytic activities using selective media. Significant proportion of the isolates (44%) exhibited lipase activity, while only few (11%) had protease activity. The 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis revealed that most of the isolates related to the genera Bacillus, Acinetobacter, Staphylococcus, Aeromonas, Psychrobacter, Dietzia and Isoptericola. Examined bacteria displayed significant tolerance against varying salt concentrations. Most of the isolates displayed antagonism against 10 selected target organisms. Bacteria were also assessed for their resistance and sensitivity against different antibiotics. Staphylococcus epidermis MJMG8.1 and Dietzia sp. MJMG8.2 grew significantly in the presence of different organic solvents. [Key Words: Microbial enzymes, antibiotic resistance, 16S rRNA sequencing, phylogeny, microbial diversity, fish-gut microflora] Introduction The culturable bacterial flora in the gut of Staphylococcus, unidentified anaerobes and yeast are freshwater and marine water fishes has been explored reported to produce exogenous enzymes. Amylases, in limited sense 1. Bacterial population in the fish gut proteases, lipases, cellulases, chitinases and few is governed by various environmental and intrinsic others have been produced by the gut flora 5, 7. factors such as species, developmental stage, feeding Studies have revealed that the gut microflora prevents strategy, structure of the digestive system and other the establishment of opportunistic pathogens in the physiological factors 2.