Toxins Mediate Glaucous-Winged Gull Predation on Bivalve Prey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Toxins Mediate Glaucous-Winged Gull Predation on Bivalve Prey SEQUESTERED PARALYTIC SHELLFISH POISONING TOXINS MEDIATE GLAUCOUS-WINGED GULL PREDATION ON BIVALVE PREY RIKK G. KVITEK 1 Departmentof Zoology,University of Washington,Seattle, Washington 98195 USA A•sllo,cr.--Glaucous-winged Gulls (Larusglaucescens) avoid paralyticshellfish poisoning by conditionedaversions developed after the regurgitationof contaminatedbivalve prey. In feeding experimentswith free-rangingGlaucous-winged Gull chicks,toxic (445 •g saxitoxin equivalentsper 100 g) butter clams(Saxidomus giganteus) were regurgitatedin <5 rain (n = 58), and nontoxic butter clamswere never regurgitated(n = 30). Chicks that had ingested toxicS. giganteusthen refusedto eat either toxicor nontoxicbutter clamsoffered later, but they acceptedother bivalve prey. In feeding experimentswith wild adult and juvenile L. glaucescens,gulls took significantlyfewer butter clamsat a site where S. giganteushas been chronicallytoxic for > 14 yr than they took at a nontoxicbut otherwisecomparable site. These preferenceswere species-specificand independentof prey toxicity or whether the live clams were intact or removed from their shells.The gulls showedno differencebetween sites in their preferencesfor three other bivalve species(Clinocardium nuttalli, Protothacastaminea, Tresuscapax), all of which containedeither no or very low levels of toxins at both sites.The aversionto intact but not to shuckedbutter clamswas more strongly developedin adults than in juveniles.Most of the gulls that ate butterclams at the toxicsite discarded the siphons (which accountfor the majorityof the toxicity in contaminatedbutter clams)of both toxic and nontoxicbutter clams,but they never discardedsiphons of other bivalves.Gulls at the nontoxicsite never discardedthe siphonsof bivalve prey. I suggestthat avian predators generallyare not at risk from paralyticshellfish poisoning toxin via bivalve vectorsbecause they can detectand avoid toxic prey. Becauseof the apparentinability of gulls to discriminate between toxic and nontoxic individuals of the same prey species,avian predation pressure on somebivalve populationsmay be greatly reduced.Received 16 [uly 1990,accepted 8 November 1990. PARALYTICshellfish poisoning (PSP) results al. 1971, Shumway 1990). Toxic "red tides" from the consumption of food contaminated (bloomsof toxigenic dinoflagellates)recur glob- with highly lethal neurotoxinsproduced by ally, appear to be increasingin frequency, and toxigenic dinoflagellates (Protogonyaulaxspp.) result in numerous shellfishery closuresand (Halstead 1978). Paralytic shellfish poisoning human illnesses and deaths every year (Hal- toxins (PSPT) can move through marine food stead1978, Nishitani and Chew 1988,Shumway chains and have been implicated in the mass 1990). mortalities of planktivorous fish (White 1977, Although many marineand coastalbirds prey 1980, 1981a, b) and seabirds (McKernan and on bivalves (Oldham 1930, Recher 1966, Barash Scheffer 1942, Coulson et al. 1968, Bicknell and et al. 1975,Sanger and Jones1982, Vermeer 1982, Walsh 1975,Sasner et al. 1975,Armstrong et al. Bourne 1984, Nettleship et al. 1984, Richardson 1978, Hockey and Cooper 1980, Nisbet 1983). and Verbeek 1986, Roberts et al. 1989) known The most common vector of the toxins in cases to concentratePSPT (Quayle 1969, Prakashet of bird mortalities has been planktivorous fish, al. 1971),avian mortalities have only rarely been yet it is suspension-feedingbivalves that pre- associatedwith PSPTcontaminated bivalve prey sent the greatestparalytic shellfish poisoning (Bicknell and Walsh 1975, Sasner et al. 1975, risk to human health (Quayle 1969, Prakashet Hockeyand Couper 1980).Indeed, it is the rar- ity of PSP-relatedavian deathsthat is most sur- prising given the extremelethality of the toxins • Present address:Moss Landing Marine Labora- and their widespread occurrence. Paralytic tories, P.O. Box450, Moss Landing, California 95034 shellfish poisoning toxins are among the most USA. potent neurotoxins known and are fatal to most 381 The Auk 108: 381-392. April 1991 382 RIKKG. KVITEK [Auk,Vol. 108 vertebratesat extremely small concentrations 1984, Nettleship et al. 1984, Richardson and (Halstead1978). The World Health Organiza- Verbeek 1986). tion has set the maximum PSPT concentration Gulls (Larusspp.) commonlyprey on bivalves allowed in shellfishfor human consumptionat by dropping them from aloft to crack open the 80 •g STX equivalents/100g. (Paralyticshell- shell (Oldham 1930, Barash et al. 1975, Roberts fish poisoningtoxins are derivativesof saxitox- et al. 1989). In the Pacific Northwest, Glaucous- in [STX], one of the two most lethal PSPT, and winged Gulls (Larusglaucescens) frequently for- mouse bioassay results are expressed in STX age on infaunal bivalves (Protothacastaminea, equivalents.)In two studieswith birds,pigeons Tapesjaponica, Clinocardium nuttalli, and Saxido- (Columbasp.) were found to have a LD50of 90 musgiganteus) (Barash et al. 1975, Vermeer 1982, •g STX equivalents/kg(see Halstead 1978), and pets. obs.). Each of these prey species retains the lethal dose for EuropeanStarlings (Sturnus PSPTfor varying lengths of time (5 weeksto 2 vulgaris)was <490 •g STX/kg (Kvitek and Beit- yr) following exposure to a toxic "red tide" let 1988, 1989). Because bivalve toxicities are (Quayle 1969, Shumway 1990). Red tides are routinelywell abovethese levels in manyareas, commonalong the west coastof North America, often measuredin the thousandsof gg STX/100 with many beachesclosed to clamming each g (Quayle 1969, Prakash et al. 1971, Halstead year (Quayle 1969, Nishitani and Chew 1988), 1978, Shumway 1990), either avian survival or but there have never been reports of gull mor- their predationon bivalvesmust be profoundly talities associated with toxic shellfish. In Wash- influenced at these times, unless the birds are ington State alone, bivalves at >50 sites con- highly resistantto PSPT. tained PSPT concentrations above the public Immunity to PSPT is not the most probable health closurelevel (80 •g STX equivalents/100 explanation for the rarity of bivalve-related g) during 1989 (Washington State Department PSPTbird mortalitiesgiven that PSPThas been of Health unpubl. rep.). implicated in bird kills via other vectorsas well My primary purpose was to resolve the par- as bivalves in a few cases.A more likely hy- adox of seabirds that prey on bivalves but do pothesis is that avian predators may develop not die as a result of PSPT-contaminatedprey. aversionsto toxicbivalve prey. Tufts (1979)cites I conducteda seriesof feeding experimentswith anecdotalaccounts of residentgulls (Larusspp.) free-ranging wild Glaucous-winged Gulls to and eiders (Somateriaspp.) avoiding toxic shell- determine (1) if experienced and naive gulls fish that kill migratory Black Ducks (Anasrub- differ in their responseto toxic prey, (2) wheth- ripes),and of a duck that regurgitated force-fed er or not naive gulls develop a conditioned toxic mussels.Acquired aversionsto toxic prey aversionfollowing the ingestionof toxic prey, have been well documented for some insectiv- and (3) at what level (individual, species,genus orous birds (e.g. Blue Jays,Cyanocitta cristata, or family) conditioned gulls discriminate be- that encounter monarch butterflies; Brower and tween prey, if an aversion is formed. I chose Fink 1985). These specieshave learned to iden- butter clams as the toxic prey because of the tify and avoid prey that is toxic or likely to be availability of highly toxic individuals due to toxic, and in some cases to circumvent the this species'tendency to retain PSPTfor > 1 yr chemical defensesof their prey by selective re- (Quayle 1969, Shumway 1990). They are also jection of the most toxic tissues. Similar re- abundant in many intertidal habitats and thus sponseshave been demonstrated in sea otters frequently eatenby Glaucous-wingedGulls and (Enhydralutris; Kvitek et al. in press) and fish other birds (Barash et al. 1975, Vermeer 1982, (Leptocottusarmatus; Kvitek MS) fed PSPT-con- Vermeer and Bourne 1984, pets. obs.).I selected taminated bivalves. three sitesfor the experiments.One was a Glau- If it occurs, avoidance of bivalve and other cous-wingedGull breeding area that does not intertidal invertebratesby avian predatorsas a supportinfaunal bivalve prey asforage for gulls; result of sequesteredPSPT could have signifi- the second, an area heavily used by foraging cant ecological and economic implications. Glaucous-wingedGulls where butter clamsbut Shorebirds have been shown to have profound not all bivalves are chronically toxic; and the effectson infaunal prey abundanceand distri- third, a similar but nontoxic site as a control. In bution (O'Conner and Brown 1977, Evans et al. this way I was able to comparethe feeding be- 1979, Quammen 1984) and to prey heavily on havior of birds chronically exposedto PSPT- commerciallyimportant bivalve species(Bourne laden butter clams with that of naive chicks at April 1991] Gullsand Shellfish Toxins 383 TAnIll 1. Bivalve communitiesat ScatchetHead (nontoxic site) and Middle Ground (toxic site). Toxicity levels aregiven for bivalvesused in gull feedingexperiments; NDT = nodetectable toxin (< 37•g STXequivalents/ 100g). All sampleswere analyzed with mousebioassay, except the cockles,which were tested with high performanceliquid chromatography. Means _+ SD are givenfor bivalvedensity (n = 5 and 6 for Scatchet Head and Middle Ground, respectively). Scatchet Head (nontoxic) Middle Ground (toxic) Toxicity Density Toxicity Density Species (ug STX/100g) (ind./0.25m 2) (ugSTX/100 g) (ind./0.25m
Recommended publications
  • Small Scale Clam Farming in Washington
    S m a l l - S c a l e CLAM Farming For PleaSure and ProFit in WaShington According to one Native American tale, the first humans arrived in the Pacific Northwest by stepping out of a clam shell. Since those ancient times, clams have had central roles in shaping the cultures and economies of the Pacific Northwest. For many shoreline property owners or leaseholders in Washington, clam farming is an enjoyable and sometimes profitable way to remain connected with the rich aquacultural legacy of the state. It is also a good way for them to become more aware of coastal processes such as sedimentation and erosion and to be vigilant for Spartina cordgrass, European green crab and other unintentionally introduced marine organisms. Two clam species — native littleneck clams and Manila clams — are routinely farmed in Washington. This publication introduces shoreline property owners and leaseholders to these two species and describes methods for growing clams for consumption. 1 2 IntroducIng two PoPular clams Three clam species — native littleneck clams (Protothaca staminea), Manila clams (Venerupis japonica) and geoduck clams (Panope abrupta) — are routinely farmed in Washington. Successful cultivation of geoduck clams entails different farming strategies and, as such, is not described in this introductory document. Native littleneck clams have been an important food On Washington beaches, Manila clams thrive in source of Northwest coastal Indian tribes. These clams protected bays and inlets on relatively stable have relatively thick shells that can attain a length of beaches with mixtures of gravel, sand, three inches. They can grow to a harvestable size in mud and shell.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Variation of Biochemical Components in Clam (Saxidomus
    J. Ocean Univ. China (Oceanic and Coastal Sea Research) DOI 10.1007/s11802-016-2855-6 ISSN 1672-5182, 2016 15 (2): 341-350 http://www.ouc.edu.cn/xbywb/ E-mail:[email protected] Seasonal Variation of Biochemical Components in Clam (Saxidomus purpuratus Sowerby 1852) in Relation to Its Reproductive Cycle and the Environmental Condition of Sanggou Bay, China BI Jinhong1), 2), LI Qi1), *, ZHANG Xinjun2), ZHANG Zhixin2), TIAN Jinling2), XU Yushan2), and LIU Wenguang3) 1) Key Laboratory of Mariculture of Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, P. R. China 2) Rongcheng Fishery Technical Extension Station, Rongcheng 264300, P. R. China 3) Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-Resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, P. R. China (Received January 3, 2015; revised March 2, 2015; accepted December 29, 2015) © Ocean University of China, Science Press and Spring-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 Abstract Seasonal variation of biochemical components in clam (Saxidomus purpuratus Sowerby 1852) was investigated from March 2012 to February 2013 in relation to environmental condition of Sanggou Bay and the reproductive cycle of clam. According to the histological analysis, the reproductive cycle of S. purpuratus includes two distinctive phases: a total spent and inactive stage from November to January, and a gametogenesis stage, including ripeness and spawning, during the rest of the year. Gametes were generated at a low temperature (2.1℃) in February. Spawning took place once a year from June to October. The massive spawning occurred in August when the highest water temperature and chlorophyll a level could be observed.
    [Show full text]
  • Saxidomus Giganteus Class: Bivalvia; Heterodonta Order: Veneroida Beefsteak Clam, Butter, Or Washington Clam (Deshayes,1839) Family: Veneridae
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Oregon Scholars' Bank Phylum: Mollusca Saxidomus giganteus Class: Bivalvia; Heterodonta Order: Veneroida Beefsteak clam, butter, or Washington clam (Deshayes,1839) Family: Veneridae Description Ecological Information Size—adults average 3 inches, can be 4 (10 Range—Aleutians to Monterey, California; but cm). rare in the southern range. Color—whitish; can have blackish Distribution—bays and estuaries, rarely on discoloration; interior white; exterior open coast or inlets with oceanic influence sometimes tan, particularly young specimens. (Packard 1918). Exterior—shell oval (Coan and Carlton Habitat—mud or sand (Coan and Carlton 1975), posterior truncate (Keen and Coan 1975); gravelly beaches (Puget Sound) 1974); concentric, rough ribs close together, (Kozloff 1974a); cigar-shaped or deflated no radial lines (fig. 1); valves gape only figure eight-shaped hole, 1/2-3/4 inch long slightly at posterior end (gape less than 1/4 (Jacobson 1975) (1.2-2 cm). shell width) (Kozloff 1974a); can retract Temperature—prefers colder waters (see siphon, but not foots; valves very similar; shell range). thick, heavy: deep (fig. 2). Tidal Level—can be found down to 30 cm, Interior—valves similar: inner ventral margin (about 12 inches) from surface, but frequently smooth (Keen and Coan 1974), inner surface closer to surface (Kozloff 1974a). white "porcelaneous"; with subequal darker Associates—occasionally infested wan muscle scars. Pallial line continuous, not a Immature specimens of commensal pea crab series of scars (Kozloff 1974a), (but broken by Pinnixa littoralis; but usually free of parasites a sinus), fig. 3. Flesh often red: "beefsteak" (Ricketts and Calvin 1971).
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Final Report
    Final Report Chugach Regional Resources Commission Bivalve Enhancement Program Bivalve inventories and native littleneck clam (Protothaca staminea) culture studies Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council Project Number 95131 Produced by: Dr. Kenneth M. Brooks Aquatic Environmental Sciences 644 Old Eaglemount Road Port Townsend, Washington 98368 February 2, 2001 Chugach Regional Resources Commission Bivalve Enhancement Program – Bivalve Inventories and native littleneck clam (Protothaca staminea) culture studies Table of contents Page Introduction 1 1.0. Background information 2 1.1. Littleneck clam life history 2 1.1.1. Reproduction 3 1.1.2. Distribution as a function of tidal elevation. 3 1.1.3. Substrate preferences 3 1.1.4. Habitat Suitability Index (HIS) for native littleneck clams. 3 1.2. Marking clams and other bivalves 5 1.3. Aging of bivalves 6 1.4. Length at age for native littleneck clams in Alaska 8 1.5. Bivalve predators 8 1.6. Bivalve culture 9 1.7. Clam culture techniques 10 1.7.1. Predator control 11 1.7.2. Supplemental seeding 11 1.7.3. Substrate modification. 11 1.7.4. Plastic netting 11 1.7.5. Plastic clam bags 12 1.8. Commercial clam harvest management in Alaska 12 1.9. Environmental effects associated with bivalve culture 13 1.10. Background summary 15 1.11. Purpose of this study 15 2.0. Materials, methods and results for the bivalve inventories conducted in 1995 and 1996 at Port Graham, Nanwalek, Tatitlek, Chenega and Ouzinke. 17 2.1. 1995-96 bivalve inventory sampling design. 17 2.2. Clam sample processing. 18 2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Venerid Bibliography References for the "Generic Names" Database As Well As Other Selected Works on the Family Veneridae
    PEET Bivalvia Venerid Bibliography References for the "Generic Names" database as well as other selected works on the family Veneridae Accorsi Benini, C. (1974). I fossili di Case Soghe - M. Lungo (Colli Berici, Vicenza); II, Lamellibranchi. Memorie Geopaleontologiche dell'Universita de Ferrara 3(1): 61-80. Adachi, K. (1979). Seasonal changes of the protein level in the adductor muscle of the clam, Tapes philippinarum (Adams and Reeve) with reference to the reproductive seasons. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 64A(1): 85-89 Adams, A. (1864). On some new genera and species of Mollusca from the seas of China and Japan. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 13(3): 307-310. Adams, C. B. (1845). Specierum novarum conchyliorum, in Jamaica repertorum, synopsis. Pars I. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History 12: 1-10. Ahn, I.-Y., G. Lopez, R. E. Malouf (1993). Effects of the gem clam Gemma gemma on early post-settlement emigration, growth and survival of the hard clam Mercenaria mercenaria. Marine Ecology -- Progress Series 99(1/2): 61-70 (2 Sept.) Ahn, I.-Y., R. E. Malouf, G. Lopez (1993). Enhanced larval settlement of the hard clam Mercenaria mercenaria by the gem clam Gemma gemma. Marine Ecology -- Progress Series 99(1/2): 51-59 Alemany, J. A. (1986). Estudio comparado de la microestructura de la concha y el enrollamiento espiral en V. decussata (L. 1758) y V. rhomboides (Pennant, 1777) (Bivalvia: Veneridae). Bollettino Malacologico 22(5-8): 139-152. Alemany, J. A. (1987). Estudio comparado de la microestructura de la concha y el enrollamiento espiral en Dosinia exoleta (L.
    [Show full text]
  • LIBI Appendix A
    Lummi Intertidal Baseline Inventory Appendix A: Intertidal Biota Survey Prepared by: Lummi Natural Resources Department (LNR) 2616 Kwina Rd. Bellingham, WA 98226 Contributors: Craig Dolphin LNR Fisheries Shellfish Biologist Michael LeMoine LNR Fisheries Habitat Biologist Jeremy Freimund LNR Water Resources Manager March 2010 A B C D Collecting Intertidal Biota Survey samples during the LIBI. A: Anthony George and Dacia Wiitala. B: Dewey Solomon and Dan Haught. C: Jordan Ballew and Johnathan Robinson D. Delanae Estes and Jessica Urbanec. E. Julie Barber E Executive Summary The Intertidal Biota Survey documented the presence, relative abundance, and preferred habitats of benthic infauna that are present on the Lummi Reservation tidelands. 366 sites were characterized and sampled across the Lummi Reservation tidelands, and the biota present were identified and counted. Approximately 150 taxa were identified in the samples, with some taxonomic labels including more than one species. Overall, polychaete worms in the Family Oweniidae were the most abundant animal taxon present across the Reservation tidelands, followed by caprellid amphipods (Caprella sp.), and then horn shells (Batillaria attramentaria). The most abundant clam species was the recently arrived purple varnish clam (Nuttallia obscurata), which also had the largest total biomass (19.9 million pounds) of any clam species. Butter clam (Saxidomus gigantea), cockle (Clinocardium nuttali), Manila clam (Venerupis phillipinarum), and Pacific littleneck clam (Leukoma staminea) populations had 6.7, 2.7, 2.9, and 2.1 million pounds of biomass, respectively. Horse clam (Tresus sp.) and softshell clam (Mya arenaria) populations were also present but estimates of biomass indicate lower overall biomass for these species (1.6 and 1.2 million pounds, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny of Veneridae (Mollusca:Bivalvia) Based on Nuclear Ri- Bosomal Internal Transcribed Spacer Region
    International Journal of Molecular Biology ISSN: 0976-0482 & E-ISSN: 0976-0490, Volume 5, Issue 1, 2014, pp.-097-101. Available online at http://www.bioinfopublication.org/jouarchive.php?opt=&jouid=BPJ0000235 MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY OF VENERIDAE (MOLLUSCA:BIVALVIA) BASED ON NUCLEAR RI- BOSOMAL INTERNAL TRANSCRIBED SPACER REGION AMPILI M.1* AND SREEDHAR S.K.2 1Department of Zoology, N.S.S. Hindu College, Changanassery- 686 102, Kerala, India. 2Department of Zoology, S.N. College, Cherthala- 688 530, Kerala, India. *Corresponding Author: Email- [email protected] Received: April 03, 2014; Accepted: April 24, 2014 Abstract- In the present study, molecular phylogeny of bivalve family Veneridae (Mollusca:Bivalvia) was analysed using internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of 21 species belonging to different subfamilies of Veneridae. ITS of ribosomal DNA can be utilised for delineating evolu- tionary and genetic relationships between closely related taxa. ITS region of Paphia malabarica belonging to subfamily Tapetinae and Meretrix casta belonging to meretricinae was sequenced. Total genomic DNA was extracted from the adductor muscle using CTAB protocol and the internal transcribed spacer region of nuclear ribosomal DNA was PCR amplified and sequenced using ITS (ITS1 and ITS2) forward and re- verse primers. Total length of sequence was found to be 895 bp in Paphia malabarica and 785 bp in Meretrix casta. GC contents in the se- quences were found to be 58.99% and 64.68% respectively in Paphia malabarica and Meretrix casta. ITS1 region of Paphia malabarica con- sisted of 393 bp with GC content 58.12% and 309 bp with 63.75% GC content in Meretrix casta.
    [Show full text]
  • The History, Present Condition, and Future of the Molluscan Fisheries of North and Central Am.Erica and Europe
    NOAA Technical Report NMFS 127 September 1997 The History, Present Condition, and Future of the Molluscan Fisheries of North and Central Am.erica and Europe VoluIne 1, Atlantic and Gulf Coasts Edited by Clyde L. MacKenzie, Jr. Victor G. Burrell, Jr. Aaron Rosenfield Willis L. Hobart U.S. Department of Commerce u.s. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE WIUJAM M. DALEY NOAA SECRETARY National Oceanic and Technical Atmospheric Administration D. James Baker Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere Reports NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service Technical Reports of the Fishery Bulletin Rolland A. Schmitten Assistant Administrator for Fisheries Scientific Editor Dr. John B. Pearce Northeast Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA 166 Water Street Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543-1097 Editorial Conunittee Dr. Andrew E. Dizon National Marine Fisheries Service Dr. Linda L. Jones National Marine Fisheries Service Dr. Richard D. Methot National Marine Fisheries Service Dr. Theodore W. Pietsch University ofWashington Dr.Joseph E. Powers National Marine Fisheries Service Dr. Tint D. Smith National Marine Fisheries Service Managing Editor Shelley E. Arenas Scientific Publications Office National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA 7600 Sand Point Way N.E. Seattle, Washington 98115-0070 The NOAA Technical Report NMFS (ISSN 0892-8908) series is published by the Scientific Publications Office, Na­ tional Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way N.E., Seatde, WA The NOAA Technical Report NMFS series of the Fishery Bulletin carries peer-re­ 98115-0070. viewed, lengthy original research reports, taxonomic keys, species synopses, flora The Secretary of Commerce has de­ and fauna studies, and data intensive reports on investigations in fishery science, termined that the publication of dlis se­ engineering, and economics.
    [Show full text]
  • Compsomyax Subdiaphana (Carpenter, 1864)
    Compsomyax subdiaphana (Carpenter, 1864) Nomenclature Phylum Mollusca Class Bivalvia Order Venerida Family Veneridae Callista subdiaphana, Clementia subdiaphana, Clementia obliqua, Common Synonyms (S) Meretrix iizukai, Previous Names (PN) Saxidomus gibbosus Distribution Type Locality Cook inlet and Prince William Sound, Alaska, to Bahia San Quintin, Baja California, and at Puertecitos, in the Golfo de California, in 2-500 m, in soft Geographic Distribution mud, frequently in areas with high organic content Description Length to 85 mm; shape subovate to subtrigonal; very inflated; posterior end longer; periostracum thin, with adherent sand grains or mud on surface; sculpture of fine, closely spaced commarginal striae; umbones anterior, prosogyrate; hinge plate feeble; anterior end of hinge plate deeply channeled; cardinal teeth stout, posterior cardinal tooth of right valve bifid; pallial sinus of moderate size, pointed; lunule weakly demarcated; escutcheon absent; ligament external, sunken; inner ventral margin smooth. Related Species and Characteristic Differences Species Name Diagnostic Characteristics Saxidomus gigantea Deep pallial sinus; protruding ligament; strong/short anterior lateral tooth WA STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 1 of 3 11/15/2017 Diagnostic Characteristics Diagnostic Characteristics Photo Credit: Marine Sediment Monitoring Team Anterior lateral tooth in right valve with beveled channel Pallial sinus moderate and pointed; smooth ventral margin Sunken ligament WA STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 2 of 3 11/15/2017 Literature Coan, E.V., Valentich-Scott, P., and F.R. Bernard. 2000. Bivalve Seashells of Western North America Marine Bivalve Mollusks from Arctic Alaska to Baja California. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History Monographs Number 2. Studies in Biodiversity Number 2. ISBN 0-936494-30-1. Santa Barbara: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultrastructural Characteristics of the Testis, Spermatogenesis and Taxonomic Values of Sperm Morphology in Male Ruditapes Philippinarum in Western Korea
    Dev. Reprod. Vol. 17, No. 2, 121~132, June, 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.12717/DR.2013.17.2.121 ISSN 1226-6752 (Print)․ISSN 2287-7967 (Online) Ultrastructural Characteristics of the Testis, Spermatogenesis and Taxonomic Values of Sperm Morphology in Male Ruditapes philippinarum in Western Korea Jin Hee Kim1, Jae Seung Chung2 and †Ki-Young Lee3 1Marine Eco-Technology Institute, Busan 608-830, Republic of Korea 2Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Inje University, Busan 614-735, Republic of Korea 3Department of Marine Biotechnology, Kunsan National Univerity, Kunsan 573-701, Republic of Korea ABSTRACT : Ultrastructural characteristics of the germ cells and accessory cells in testis during spermatogenesis and taxonomic values of mature sperm morphology of Ruditapes philippinarum were investigated by the transmission electron microscope and scanning electron microscope observations. The testis is the diffuse organ that consists of branching acini containing developing germ cells and accessory cells associated with spermatogenesis. The morphology of the spermatozoon is of the primitive type and is somewhat different to those of other bivalves. The morphologies of the sperm nucleus type and the acrosome shape of this species have a cylinderical type and a modified cone shape, respectively. As some ultrastructural characteristics of the acrosomal vesicle, the peripheral parts of two basal rings show electron opaque part, while the apex part of the acrosome shows electron lucent part. These characteristics of sperm belong to the family Veneridae in the subclass Heterodonta, unlike a characteristic of the subclass Pteriomorphia showing all part of the acrosome being composed of electron opaque part. In particular, a cylinder-like nucleus of the sperm is curved.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix H Benthic Infauna Data
    APPENDIX H BENTHIC INFAUNA DATA Raw Benthic Infauna Counts Table H-1 - 2018 RHMP Sediment Quality Objectives (SQO) Assessment - Dancing Coyote Benthic Infaunal Community - Raw Identification Taxonomist Phylum Class Order Family Taxon 10015 10016 10017 10019 10020 10022 10023 10024 10029 10030 Lovell ANNELIDA Clitellata Haplotaxida Tubificidae Tubificinae Lovell ANNELIDA Polychaeta Capitellidae Capitella capitata Cmplx 2 1 Lovell ANNELIDA Polychaeta Capitellidae Decamastus gracilis Lovell ANNELIDA Polychaeta Capitellidae Heteromastus sp Lovell ANNELIDA Polychaeta Capitellidae Mediomastus sp 84 3 2 2 10 Lovell ANNELIDA Polychaeta Capitellidae Mediomastus sp 6 Harris 2001 Lovell ANNELIDA Polychaeta Capitellidae Notomastus hemipodus Lovell ANNELIDA Polychaeta Capitellidae Notomastus lineatus Lovell ANNELIDA Polychaeta Capitellidae Notomastus magnus 1 Lovell ANNELIDA Polychaeta Capitellidae Notomastus sp 3 Lovell ANNELIDA Polychaeta Maldanidae Euclymeninae 2 1 Lovell ANNELIDA Polychaeta Maldanidae Euclymeninae sp A 2 Lovell ANNELIDA Polychaeta Maldanidae Maldane sarsi Lovell ANNELIDA Polychaeta Maldanidae Metasychis disparidentatus 2 1 Lovell ANNELIDA Polychaeta Maldanidae Notoproctus pacificus Lovell ANNELIDA Polychaeta Maldanidae Petaloclymene pacifica Lovell ANNELIDA Polychaeta Maldanidae Praxillella pacifica Pasko ANNELIDA Polychaeta Echiuridea Bonelliidae Nellobia eusoma Pasko ANNELIDA Polychaeta Echiuridea Thalassematidae Arhynchite californicus Lovell ANNELIDA Polychaeta Eunicida Amphinomidae Pareurythoe californica 25 Lovell ANNELIDA
    [Show full text]
  • Brachyura: Pinnotheridae), with an Updated List of Symbiont-Host Associations
    diversity Review A Review of the Ecomorphology of Pinnotherine Pea Crabs (Brachyura: Pinnotheridae), with an Updated List of Symbiont-Host Associations Werner de Gier 1,2,* and Carola Becker 3 1 Taxonomy and Systematics Group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands 2 Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 11103, 9700 CC Groningen, The Netherlands 3 Vergleichende Zoologie, Institut für Biologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Philippstraße 13, Haus 2, 10115 Berlin, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +31-7-1751-9600 Received: 14 October 2020; Accepted: 10 November 2020; Published: 16 November 2020 Abstract: Almost all pea crab species in the subfamily Pinnotherinae (Decapoda: Brachyura: Pinnotheridae) are considered obligatory endo- or ectosymbionts, living in a mutualistic or parasitic relationship with a wide variety of invertebrate hosts, including bivalves, gastropods, echinoids, holothurians, and ascidians. While the subfamily is regarded as one of the most morphologically adapted groups of symbiotic crabs, the functionality of these adaptations in relation to their lifestyles has not been reviewed before. Available information on the ecomorphological adaptations of various pinnotherine crab species and their functionality was compiled in order to clarify their ecological diversity. These include the size, shape, and ornamentations of the carapace, the frontal appendages and mouthparts, the cheliped morphology, the ambulatory legs, and the reproductive anatomy and larval characters. The phylogenetic relevance of the adaptations is also reviewed and suggestions for future studies are made. Based on an updated list of all known pinnotherine symbiont–host associations and the available phylogenetic reconstructions, it is concluded that, due to convergent evolution, unrelated species with a similar host interaction might display the same morphological adaptations.
    [Show full text]