DOCSLIB.ORG

Mammals of the Rincon Mountain District, Saguaro National Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mammals of the Rincon Mountain District, Saguaro National Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Mammals of the Rincon Mountain District, Saguaro National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/SODN/NRR—2011/437 ON THE COVER Jaguar killed in Rincon Mountains in 1902, photographed at saloon in downtown Tucson. Photograph courtesy Arizona Historical Society. Mammals of the Rincon Mountain District, Saguaro National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/SODN/NRR—2011/437 Author Don E. Swann With contributions by Melanie Bucci, Matthew Caron, Matthew Daniels, Ronnie Sidner, Sandy A. Wolf, and Erin R. Zylstra Saguaro National Park 3693 South Old Spanish Trail Tucson, Arizona 85730-5601 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Sonoran Desert Network 7660 E. Broadway Blvd., Suite 303 Tucson, AZ 85710 August 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service’s Natural Resource Stewardship and Science offi ce, in Fort Collins, Colo- rado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the informa- tion is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received formal peer review by subject- matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data, and whose background and expertise put them on par technically and scientifi cally with the authors of the information. Views, statements, fi ndings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily refl ect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available from the Sonoran Desert Network website, http://science.nature.nps.gov/ im/units/sodn/index.cfm, and the Natural Resource Publications Management website, http://www. nature.nps.gov/publications/NRPM. Please cite this publication as: Swann, D. E. 2011. Mammals of the Rincon Mountain District, Saguaro National Park. Natural Resource Report NPS/SODN/NRR—2011/437. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 151/109187, August 2011 ii Mammals of the Rincon Mountain District, Saguaro National Park Contents Photos .....................................................................................................................................v Maps .....................................................................................................................................vii Abstract .................................................................................................................................ix Acronyms ...............................................................................................................................xi Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................xiii Introduction ...........................................................................................................................1 Marsupials ..............................................................................................................................2 Virginia Opossum .......................................................................................................................... 2 Insectivores .............................................................................................................................4 Desert Shrew ................................................................................................................................. 4 Bats..........................................................................................................................................6 Mexican Long-Tongued Bat .......................................................................................................... 6 Lesser Long-Nosed Bat .................................................................................................................. 8 Southwestern Myotis .................................................................................................................. 10 California Myotis ......................................................................................................................... 12 Western Small-Footed Myotis ....................................................................................................14 Fringed Myotis ............................................................................................................................. 16 Cave Myotis.................................................................................................................................. 18 Long-Legged Myotis ................................................................................................................... 20 Yuma Myotis ................................................................................................................................ 22 Western Red Bat .......................................................................................................................... 24 Hoary Bat ..................................................................................................................................... 26 Silver-Haired Bat .......................................................................................................................... 28 Western Pipistrelle ...................................................................................................................... 30 Big Brown Bat .............................................................................................................................. 32 Townsend’s Big-Eared Bat ........................................................................................................... 34 Pallid Bat ...................................................................................................................................... 36 Brazilian (Mexican) Free-Tailed Bat ............................................................................................ 38 Pocketed Free-Tailed Bat ............................................................................................................ 40 Rabbits ..................................................................................................................................42 Desert Cottontail ......................................................................................................................... 42 Eastern Cottontail ...................................................................................................................... 44 Antelope Jackrabbit .................................................................................................................... 46 Black-Tailed Jackrabbit................................................................................................................ 48 Rodents .................................................................................................................................50 Cliff Chipmunk ............................................................................................................................. 50 Harris’s Antelope Squirrel ........................................................................................................... 52 Round-Tailed Ground Squirrel .................................................................................................... 54 Rock Squirrel ................................................................................................................................ 56 Abert’s Squirrel ............................................................................................................................ 58 Arizona Gray Squirrel .................................................................................................................. 60 Botta’s Pocket Gopher ................................................................................................................ 62 Arizona Pocket Mouse ................................................................................................................ 64 Bailey’s Pocket Mouse ................................................................................................................. 66 Contents iii Rock Pocket Mouse ..................................................................................................................... 68 Sonoran Desert Pocket Mouse ................................................................................................... 70 Merriam’s Kangaroo Rat ............................................................................................................. 72 Banner-Tailed Kangaroo
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CEMOZOIC DEPOSITS in the SOUTHERN FOOTHILLS of the SANTA CATALINA MOUNTAINS NEAR TUCSON, ARIZONA Ty Klaus Voelger a Thesis Submi
    Cenozoic deposits in the southern foothills of the Santa Catalina Mountains near Tucson, Arizona Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Voelger, Klaus, 1926- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 25/09/2021 10:53:10 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/551218 CEMOZOIC DEPOSITS IN THE SOUTHERN FOOTHILLS OF THE SANTA CATALINA MOUNTAINS NEAR TUCSON, ARIZONA ty Klaus Voelger A Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Department of Geology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in the Graduate College, University of Arizona 1953 Approved; , / 9S~J Director of Thesis ^5ate Univ. of Arizona Library The research on which this thesis is based was com­ pleted by Mr. Klaus Voelger of Berlin, Germany, while he was studying at the University of Arizona under the program of the Institute of International Education. The final draft was written after Mr. Voelgerf s return to his home in the Russian-occupied zone of Berlin. Difficulties such as a shortage of typing paper of uniform grade and the impossibility of adequate supervision and advice on matters of terminology, punctuation, and English usage account for certain details in which this thesis may depart from stand­ ards of the Graduate College of the University of Arizona. These details are largely mechanical, and it is felt that they do not detract appreciably from the quality of the research nor the clarity of presentation of the results.
    [Show full text]
  • Sell-0717 , Rincon Mountains, AGS Field Trip, Nov. 1971 , AZ, Pima Co. ,MILS
    CONTACT INFORMATION Mining Records Curator Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress St., Suite 100 Tucson, Arizona 85701 520-770-3500 http://www.azgs.az.gov [email protected] The following file is part of the James Doyle Sell Mining Collection ACCESS STATEMENT These digitized collections are accessible for purposes of education and research. We have indicated what we know about copyright and rights of privacy, publicity, or trademark. Due to the nature of archival collections, we are not always able to identify this information. We are eager to hear from any rights owners, so that we may obtain accurate information. Upon request, we will remove material from public view while we address a rights issue. CONSTRAINTS STATEMENT The Arizona Geological Survey does not claim to control all rights for all materials in its collection. These rights include, but are not limited to: copyright, privacy rights, and cultural protection rights. The User hereby assumes all responsibility for obtaining any rights to use the material in excess of “fair use.” The Survey makes no intellectual property claims to the products created by individual authors in the manuscript collections, except when the author deeded those rights to the Survey or when those authors were employed by the State of Arizona and created intellectual products as a function of their official duties. The Survey does maintain property rights to the physical and digital representations of the works. QUALITY STATEMENT The Arizona Geological Survey is not responsible for the accuracy of the records, information, or opinions that may be contained in the files. The Survey collects, catalogs, and archives data on mineral properties regardless of its views of the veracity or accuracy of those data.
    [Show full text]
  • Faunal Remains
    CHAPTER 13 FAUNAL REMAINS Judi L. Cameron, Consultant, Jennifer A. Waters, Desert Archaeology, Inc., Barnet Pavao-Zuckerman and Vince M. LaMotta, Arizona State Museum, and Peter D. Schulz, University of California at Davis Large numbers of animal bones were found dur- environmental modification (such as caliche-coating ing the Rio Nuevo Archaeology project. Analysts and root-etching) on each bone also was noted. examined a sample of the bones to determine how Taxonomic identifications were based on com- humans utilized animals over the course of the last parisons with a comparative collection, as well as 4,000 years. Cameron studied animal bone from Early with the aid of published keys (for mammal bones, Agricultural, Early Ceramic, and Hohokam contexts, Gilbert 1980; Olsen 1964; for bird bones, Cohen and while Waters identified bone recovered from the Serjeantson 1996; Gilbert et al. 1981; Olsen 1979). Tucson Presidio, AZ BB:13:13 (ASM), and from a Taxonomic information on fragments that could not Chinese gardeners’ well at the San Agustín Mission be identified to order or below consisted primarily locus of the Clearwater site, AZ BB:13:6 (ASM). of the definition of size categories within classes. The Pavao-Zuckerman and LaMotta analyzed bone from size categories for mammals were defined as follows: Pima features at the San Agustín Mission locus, Clear- small mammal fragments were woodrat- to rabbit- water site, and Schulz identified the fish bone recov- sized, medium mammal fragments were bobcat-/ ered from the Chinese gardener’s well. canid-sized, and large mammal fragments were deer-sized. Elements that fell in size between canid and jackrabbit were placed in a medium-small mam- FAUNAL REMAINS FROM PREHISTORIC mal category.
    [Show full text]
  • Keen's Long-Eared Myotis
    COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on the Keen’s Long-eared Bat Myotis keenii in Canada DATA DEFICIENT 2003 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2003. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on Keen’s long-eared bat Myotis keenii in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vii + 35 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm) Previous report: Balcombe, J.P. 1988. COSEWIC status report on Keen’s long-eared bat Myotis keenii in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 11 pp. Production note: COSEWIC acknowledges Douglas W. Burles and David W. Nagorsen for writing the update status report on Keen’s long-eared bat Myotis keenii in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada, overseen and edited by M. Brock Fenton, COSEWIC Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee Co-chair. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Ếgalement disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le chauve-souris de Keen (Myotis keenii) au Canada – Mise à jour. Cover illustration: Keen’s long-eared bat — Illustration by Michael Harmes, from Bats of British Columbia by D.W.
    [Show full text]
  • A GUIDE to the GEOLOGY of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: the Geology and Life Zones of a Madrean Sky Island
    A GUIDE TO THE GEOLOGY OF THE SANTA CATALINA MOUNTAINS, ARIZONA: THE GEOLOGY AND LIFE ZONES OF A MADREAN SKY ISLAND ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 22 JOHN V. BEZY Inside front cover. Sabino Canyon, 30 December 2010. (Megan McCormick, flickr.com (CC BY 2.0). A Guide to the Geology of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: The Geology and Life Zones of a Madrean Sky Island John V. Bezy Arizona Geological Survey Down-to-Earth 22 Copyright©2016, Arizona Geological Survey All rights reserved Book design: M. Conway & S. Mar Photos: Dr. Larry Fellows, Dr. Anthony Lux and Dr. John Bezy unless otherwise noted Printed in the United States of America Permission is granted for individuals to make single copies for their personal use in research, study or teaching, and to use short quotes, figures, or tables, from this publication for publication in scientific books and journals, provided that the source of the information is appropriately cited. This consent does not extend to other kinds of copying for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new or collective works, or for resale. The reproduction of multiple copies and the use of articles or extracts for comer- cial purposes require specific permission from the Arizona Geological Survey. Published by the Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress, #100, Tucson, AZ 85701 www.azgs.az.gov Cover photo: Pinnacles at Catalina State Park, Courtesy of Dr. Anthony Lux ISBN 978-0-9854798-2-4 Citation: Bezy, J.V., 2016, A Guide to the Geology of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: The Geology and Life Zones of a Madrean Sky Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal Watching in Northern Mexico Vladimir Dinets
    Mammal watching in Northern Mexico Vladimir Dinets Seldom visited by mammal watchers, Northern Mexico is a fascinating part of the world with a diverse mammal fauna. In addition to its many endemics, many North American species are easier to see here than in USA, while some tropical ones can be seen in unusual habitats. I travelled there a lot (having lived just across the border for a few years), but only managed to visit a small fraction of the number of places worth exploring. Many generations of mammologists from USA and Mexico have worked there, but the knowledge of local mammals is still a bit sketchy, and new discoveries will certainly be made. All information below is from my trips in 2003-2005. The main roads are better and less traffic-choked than in other parts of the country, but the distances are greater, so any traveler should be mindful of fuel (expensive) and highway tolls (sometimes ridiculously high). In theory, toll roads (carretera quota) should be paralleled by free roads (carretera libre), but this isn’t always the case. Free roads are often narrow, winding, and full of traffic, but sometimes they are good for night drives (toll roads never are). All guidebooks to Mexico I’ve ever seen insist that driving at night is so dangerous, you might as well just kill yourself in advance to avoid the horror. In my experience, driving at night is usually safer, because there is less traffic, you see the headlights of upcoming cars before making the turn, and other drivers blink their lights to warn you of livestock on the road ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Moose Foraging in the Temperate Forests of Southern New England Author(S) :Edward K
    Moose Foraging in the Temperate Forests of Southern New England Author(s) :Edward K. Faison, Glenn Motzkin, David R. Foster and John E. McDonald Source: Northeastern Naturalist, 17(1):1-18. 2010. Published By: Humboldt Field Research Institute DOI: 10.1656/045.017.0101 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1656/045.017.0101 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non- commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. 2010 NORTHEASTERN NATURALIST 17(1):1–18 Moose Foraging in the Temperate Forests of Southern New England Edward K. Faison1,2,*, Glenn Motzkin1, David R. Foster1, and John E. McDonald3 Abstract - Moose have recently re-colonized the temperate forests of southern New England, raising questions about this herbivore’s effect on forest dynamics in the region. We quantifi ed Moose foraging selectivity and intensity on tree species in rela- tion to habitat features in central Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals of the Finger Lakes ID Guide
    A Guide for FL WATCH Camera Trappers John Van Niel, Co-PI CCURI and FLCC Professor Nadia Harvieux, Muller Field Station K-12 Outreach Sasha Ewing, FLCC Conservation Department Technician Past and present students at FLCC Virginia Opossum Eastern Coyote Eastern Cottontail Domestic Dog Beaver Red Fox Muskrat Grey Fox Woodchuck Bobcat Eastern Gray Squirrel Feral Cat Red Squirrel American Black Bear Eastern Chipmunk Northern Raccoon Southern Flying Squirrel Striped Skunk Peromyscus sp. North American River Otter North American Porcupine Fisher Brown Rat American Mink Weasel sp. White-tailed Deer eMammal uses the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) for common and scientific names (with the exception of Domestic Dog) Often the “official” common name of a species is longer than we are used to such as “American Black Bear” or “Northern Raccoon” Please note that it is Grey Fox with an “e” but Eastern Gray Squirrel with an “a”. Face white, body whitish to dark gray. Typically nocturnal. Found in most habitats. About Domestic Cat size. Can climb. Ears and tail tip can show frostbite damage. Very common. Found in variety of habitats. Images are often blurred due to speed. White tail can overexpose in flash. Snowshoe Hare (not shown) is possible in higher elevations. Large, block-faced rodent. Common in aquatic habitats. Note hind feet – large and webbed. Flat tail. When swimming, can be confused with other semi-aquatic mammals. Dark, naked tail. Body brown to blackish (darker when wet). Football-sized rodent. Common in wet habitats. Usually doesn’t stray from water. Pointier face than Beaver.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    Arizona terrestrial vertebrate species richness: An application of Arizona GAP GIS thematic processing Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors McCarthy, Scott Beach Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 01/10/2021 07:57:06 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/278677 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfihn master. UMI fihns the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter frice, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afifect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Surveys of Saguaro National Park Protected Natural Areas
    Floristic Surveys of Saguaro National Park Protected Natural Areas William L. Halvorson and Brooke S. Gebow, editors Technical Report No. 68 United States Geological Survey Sonoran Desert Field Station The University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USGS Sonoran Desert Field Station The University of Arizona, Tucson The Sonoran Desert Field Station (SDFS) at The University of Arizona is a unit of the USGS Western Ecological Research Center (WERC). It was originally established as a National Park Service Cooperative Park Studies Unit (CPSU) in 1973 with a research staff and ties to The University of Arizona. Transferred to the USGS Biological Resources Division in 1996, the SDFS continues the CPSU mission of providing scientific data (1) to assist U.S. Department of Interior land management agencies within Arizona and (2) to foster cooperation among all parties overseeing sensitive natural and cultural resources in the region. It also is charged with making its data resources and researchers available to the interested public. Seventeen such field stations in California, Arizona, and Nevada carry out WERC’s work. The SDFS provides a multi-disciplinary approach to studies in natural and cultural sciences. Principal cooperators include the School of Renewable Natural Resources and the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at The University of Arizona. Unit scientists also hold faculty or research associate appointments at the university. The Technical Report series distributes information relevant to high priority regional resource management needs. The series presents detailed accounts of study design, methods, results, and applications possibly not accommodated in the formal scientific literature. Technical Reports follow SDFS guidelines and are subject to peer review and editing.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepus Flavigularis) in Oaxaca, Mexico
    Journal of Mammalogy, 87(4):748–756, 2006 HOME RANGE AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR OF THE ENDANGERED TEHUANTEPEC JACKRABBIT (LEPUS FLAVIGULARIS) IN OAXACA, MEXICO VERO´ NICA FARI´AS,* TODD K. FULLER,FERNANDO A. CERVANTES, AND CONSUELO LORENZO Department of Natural Resources Conservation, 160 Holdsworth Way, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003-9285, USA (VF, TKF) Laboratorio de Mastozoologı´a, Instituto de Biologı´a, Universidad Nacional Auto´noma de Me´xico, Coyoaca´n, Me´xico D.F. 04510, Me´xico (VF, FAC) Departamento de Ecologı´a y Sistema´tica Terrestre, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, San Cristo´bal de Las Casas, Chiapas 29290, Me´xico (CL) Present address of VF: Laboratorio de Ana´lisis Espaciales, Instituto de Biologı´a, Universidad Nacional Auto´noma de Me´xico, Coyoaca´n, Me´xico D.F. 04510, Me´xico We studied the home-range and core-area size and overlap of Tehuantepec jackrabbits (Lepus flavigularis) by radiotracking 32 individuals between May 2001 and April 2003 in savanna habitat in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Oaxaca, Mexico. Annual home-range and core-area sizes averaged 55 ha 6 8 SE and 8 6 1 ha for 10 adults of both sexes using the 95% and 50% fixed-kernel isopleths, respectively. Seasonal home ranges varied widely for adults, from 15 to 111 ha for females and from 24 to 166 ha for males. Juvenile males had larger seasonal home ranges than did juvenile females (X ¼ 80 and 24 ha). For adult jackrabbits, seasonal home ranges were larger during the 1st year compared to those of the 2nd year of study (X ¼ 87 and 49 ha), particularly for females.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats
    Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats A agnella, Kerivoula 901 Anchieta’s Bat 814 aquilus, Glischropus 763 Aba Leaf-nosed Bat 247 aladdin, Pipistrellus pipistrellus 771 Anchieta’s Broad-faced Fruit Bat 94 aquilus, Platyrrhinus 567 Aba Roundleaf Bat 247 alascensis, Myotis lucifugus 927 Anchieta’s Pipistrelle 814 Arabian Barbastelle 861 abae, Hipposideros 247 alaschanicus, Hypsugo 810 anchietae, Plerotes 94 Arabian Horseshoe Bat 296 abae, Rhinolophus fumigatus 290 Alashanian Pipistrelle 810 ancricola, Myotis 957 Arabian Mouse-tailed Bat 164, 170, 176 abbotti, Myotis hasseltii 970 alba, Ectophylla 466, 480, 569 Andaman Horseshoe Bat 314 Arabian Pipistrelle 810 abditum, Megaderma spasma 191 albatus, Myopterus daubentonii 663 Andaman Intermediate Horseshoe Arabian Trident Bat 229 Abo Bat 725, 832 Alberico’s Broad-nosed Bat 565 Bat 321 Arabian Trident Leaf-nosed Bat 229 Abo Butterfly Bat 725, 832 albericoi, Platyrrhinus 565 andamanensis, Rhinolophus 321 arabica, Asellia 229 abramus, Pipistrellus 777 albescens, Myotis 940 Andean Fruit Bat 547 arabicus, Hypsugo 810 abrasus, Cynomops 604, 640 albicollis, Megaerops 64 Andersen’s Bare-backed Fruit Bat 109 arabicus, Rousettus aegyptiacus 87 Abruzzi’s Wrinkle-lipped Bat 645 albipinnis, Taphozous longimanus 353 Andersen’s Flying Fox 158 arabium, Rhinopoma cystops 176 Abyssinian Horseshoe Bat 290 albiventer, Nyctimene 36, 118 Andersen’s Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arafura Large-footed Bat 969 Acerodon albiventris, Noctilio 405, 411 Andersen’s Leaf-nosed Bat 254 Arata Yellow-shouldered Bat 543 Sulawesi 134 albofuscus, Scotoecus 762 Andersen’s Little Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arata-Thomas Yellow-shouldered Talaud 134 alboguttata, Glauconycteris 833 Andersen’s Naked-backed Fruit Bat 109 Bat 543 Acerodon 134 albus, Diclidurus 339, 367 Andersen’s Roundleaf Bat 254 aratathomasi, Sturnira 543 Acerodon mackloti (see A.
    [Show full text]