DOCSLIB.ORG

The Army and Army Air Force Awards Were All for Actions in Operation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Army and Army Air Force Awards Were All for Actions in Operation The army and army air force awards were all for actions in Operation Market Garden (drama- tized in the movie A Bridge Too Far~ during the liberation of the Netherlands. This was the largest airborne operation of World War II, and involved the U.S. 82nd Airborne Division, the U.S. 101st Airborne Division, the British 1st Airborne Division, and the Polish Independent Parachute Brigade. The three naval awards were all for operations in defense of the Dutch East Indies in 1942. Dutch reference sources usually summarize the individual awards of the Fourth Class of the MWO to Americans as 12 to the 82nd Airbornd Division, 3 to the 101 st Airborne Division, 4 to the Army Air Force, and 3 to the Navy, but this appears to be slightly off. A check of the individ- ual citations seems to indicate that the actual breakdown of the army awards is 11 to the 82nd Airborne Division and 4 to the 101st. Ten of the individual awards to the 82nd Airborne Division were made by Royal Decree Num- ber 31 of 8 October 1945. The citations with this decree all specifically stated that the recipi- ents were attached to the 82nd Airborne Division. The award to Colonel Reuben H. Tucker, the citation of which also specified that he was with the 82nd Airborne Division was, like the other ten 82nd Airborne Division awards, for action in the Nijmegen area during September and Oc- tober 1944. The only MWO citations to U.S. Army personnel that have absolutely no unit iden- tification in them are those to Lieutenant Colonel Charles H. Chase and Colonel Harry W. O. Kinnard. Additional research, however, indicates that Colonel Kinnard commanded a battalion in the 101st Airborne Division. (Note 7) Also, both of these awards werre made by Royal De- cree Number 35 of 14 November 1946, which was the Decree by which the other two awards to officers of the 101st Airborne Division were made. Finally, Colonel Chase’s award citation specified that the conferment was for action between Veghel and Uden, which was in the 101st Airborne’s area of operations, and some 20 kilometers southwest of any unts of the 82nd. Thus, it would appear that he was in fact assigned to the 101st Airborne Division. By Royal Decree Number 30 of 8 October 1945, the Divisional Color of the 82nd Airborne Divi- sion was decorated with the Fourth Class of the Military Order of William. This award was made in recognition of the Division’s service at Nijmegen from 17 September to 4 October 1944. There is still one final award of the MWO to an American that must be accounted for. By Royal Decree Number 36 of 15 April 1948, a posthumous award of the Grand Cross was made to President Franklin D. Roosevelt. On 24 April 1990, there was a gathering in the Hague to celebrate the Order’s 175th anniver- sary, to which all 63 surviving Knights of the Military Order of William were invited. (Note 8) At that time, there were 4 American recipients still living: Steve A. Chappuis, Julian A. Cook, Ed- ward S. Fulmer, and Harry W. O. Kinnard. All of the American Knights except Julian Cook were able to attend. According to a letter from Mrs. Jos Mulder-Gemmeke (Note 9), President of the Royal Society of Knights of the Military Order of William (Koningiijke Vereniging v~n Ridders der M!/itaire Willems-Orde), as of 28 December 1992, Messers Chappuis, Fulmer, and Kinnard are still alive. The Society has not heard from Julian Cook since 1990. Loosely attached to the Order is the Orange Lanyard (het Oran!e Ere Ko0rd or Oran!e Fluit- k00rd. (Note 10) I have seen it referred to as both in Dutch sources). This is a plain single orange cord with a loop at each end and a brass swivel fastened in one of the loops. The lan- yard is worn by looping it over the left shoulder and placing the swivel in the left breast pocket. U.S. Army regulations call for a cord 1/4-inch (about 6.4ram) in diameter and 33-inches (about 838mm) long to be worn by U.S. personnel entitled to wear this recognintion, but Dutch sources indicate that the cord is 5mm in diameter and 900ram long. An individual who is either assigned or permanently attached ~nd ~resent for d~y with a unit during the action for which the Orange Lanyard was awarded may wear it as a permanent part of his uniform, even if sub- sequently reassigned to another unit. It is NOT authorized for temporary wear by personnel later assigned to a cited unit. The Orange Lanyard is normally awarded to any unit that receives the Fourth Class of the Mili- tary Order of William. The award is not automatic, however, but must be specifically conferred on the unit by order of the Minister of War. It may also be awarded independently. Three American units have been awarded the Orange Lanyard. The 82nd Airborne Division received it by order of the Minister of War on 8 October 1945 (Sec. X 25), the same day that it was awarded the MWO. On 20 September 1946, the Orange Lanyard was awarded to the 101 st Airborne Division (Sec. P 203). Finally, a retroactive award of the Orange Lanyard was made on 20 April 1982 to the glider pilots of the IXth Army Air Force Troop Carrier Command for their part in getting the two cited divisions into combat. According to one Dutch source, the awarding of the Orange Lanyard to the two American divisions was a mistake, since it is an insigne rather than a decoration. The United States Army has established its own streamers to represent these awards on unit flags. Army Awards Re~ulation~ provide for a yellow streamer with two 11/32-inch blue stripes, one-and-a-quarter-inches apart, to represent a unit award of the MWO and an orange streanl- er to represent an award of the Orange Lanyard. Both streamers are two-and-three-quarter- inches wide, three feet long, and have blue lettering. The lettering indicates the action for which the award was made. Also attached to the MWO were the Sword of Honor (d~ Eresabel) and the Honorable Mention (de Eervolle Vermelding), both now obsolete, but as neither of these were ever awarded to an American, their story will have to wait for another article. (Notes 11 and 12) There are a number of people I must thank for their assistance in helping me research this arti- cle. They are OMSA members C. Peter Mulder and Paul H. Till, Werner W. G. Sterubaut, Cura- tor of the Museum of the Chancery of the Dutch Orders at Paleis Het Loo in Apeldoorn, and Mrs. P. H. Th. Dumon, Secretary of the Dutch Society for the Study of Military History (Neder- landse Vereniginq ter Geoefening van de Militaire Histori~. Thanks are also due to Albert Gleim, past Editor of JOMSA, for having sent me a copy of the correspondence from the Assis- tant to the Military Attache, United States Embassy, the Hague, to the Adjutant General’s Of- rice, listing all U.S. Army recipients of Dutch awards for service during World War Two, as of 12 February 1946. It was my receipt of this list that gave me the interest in completing it in so far as MWO recipients were concerned, and so Colonel G~eim may be regarded as the "godfather" of this article. NOTES The Grand Order of the Union (Grote Orde van de Unie) (Grand Cross only) and the Order of Merit of the Kingdom of Holland (Orde van Verdienste van het Koninkri!k Holland) (de- grees of Commander and Knight) were both established by King Louis Napoleon on 11 December 1806. No insignia of the former and apparently only a few knight’s badges of the latter were ever made before they were combined into the Royal Order of Holland (Koninklijke Orde van Holland) (Grand Cross, Commander and Knight) on 14 February 1807. This Ot’der, on 6 February 1808, became the Order of the Union (Orde van de Unie), with new insignia. The Kingdom of Holland was annexed by France on 9 July 1810, and its recipients could now receive the Legion of Honor. Additionally, the Order of the Reunion was established as an Imperial French Order in three classes on 18 October 1811. Established on 18 July 1808, the Gold Medal for Excellent Bravery of the Kingdom of Hol- land (Go~den Medaille v0or Uitmuntende Da~perheid van het Koninkri!k Holland~ was only awarded six times. The Silver Medal for Bravery of the Kingdom of Holland (Zilveren Medaille vo0r Dapperheld van he~ K0ninkrijk Holland), established the same day, was only awarded to thirteen individuals. The firesteel and the green ("wooden") Burgundy cross are both symbolic of the Order of the Golden Fleece (Orde van het Gulden Vlies), established by Philip the Good, Duke of Burgundy in 1429. The "Seventeen Nederlands", most of which had passed to the Habsburgs as part of the Burgundian Inheritance, had been united and given autonomy by Charles V. in 1548, and the boundaries of Wil~em’s 1815 Kingdom of the Netherlands were almost the same as this domain. There is some evidence that Willem wanted to restore the old Burgundian Kingdom centered on the territories he ruled, and that he also wanted to restore the Order of the Golden Fleece in the Netherlands with hemself as the Grand Master, but for political reasons these were both impossibilities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The United States Atomic Army, 1956-1960 Dissertation
    INTIMIDATING THE WORLD: THE UNITED STATES ATOMIC ARMY, 1956-1960 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Paul C. Jussel, B.A., M.M.A.S., M.S.S. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee Approved by Professor Allan R. Millett, Advisor Professor John R. Guilmartin __________________ Professor William R. Childs Advisor Department of History ABSTRACT The atomic bomb created a new military dynamic for the world in 1945. The bomb, if used properly, could replace the artillery fires and air-delivered bombs used to defeat the concentrated force of an enemy. The weapon provided the U.S. with an unparalleled advantage over the rest of the world, until the Soviet Union developed its own bomb by 1949 and symmetry in warfare returned. Soon, theories of warfare changed to reflect the belief that the best way to avoid the effects of the bomb was through dispersion of forces. Eventually, the American Army reorganized its divisions from the traditional three-unit organization to a new five-unit organization, dubbed pentomic by its Chief of Staff, General Maxwell D. Taylor. While atomic weapons certainly had an effect on Taylor’s reasoning to adopt the pentomic organization, the idea was not new in 1956; the Army hierarchy had been wrestling with restructuring since the end of World War II. Though the Korean War derailed the Army’s plans for the early fifties, it returned to the forefront under the Eisenhower Administration. The driving force behind reorganization in 1952 was not ii only the reoriented and reduced defense budget, but also the Army’s inroads to the atomic club, formerly the domain of only the Air Force and the Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • EXTENSIONS of REMARKS, Vol
    32618 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS, Vol. 155, Pt. 24 December 17, 2009 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS HONORING ROSE KAUFMAN rollcall Vote No. 933; H. Res. 940, rollcall Vote is that of the largest land battle in our Army’s No. 934; H. Res. 845, rollcall Vote No. 935; history and the turning point of World War II. HON. NANCY PELOSI H.R. 2278, rollcall Vote No. 936; H. Res. 915, Its precedent is the model it provides, even OF CALIFORNIA rollcall Vote No. 937; and H. Res. 907, rollcall today, for our men and women in combat. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Vote No. 938. During my 31 years of service in the Navy, I f witnessed acts of extraordinary bravery and Wednesday, December 16, 2009 resolve among the men and women under my HONORING THE 65TH ANNIVER- Ms. PELOSI. Madam Speaker, I rise today command. As a Vice Admiral, I was honored SARY OF THE BATTLE OF THE to honor the life of an extraordinary wife, to serve with the finest sailors that our country BULGE mother, grandmother, and artist, Rose Kauf- has to offer and witness these men and man. women perform their duties with the same pur- The Pelosi family was blessed to be forever HON. JOE SESTAK pose and spirit that led the Allied Forces to joined to the Kaufman family when our daugh- OF PENNSYLVANIA victory 65 years ago. ter Christine married Rose and Phil’s son, IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES This past August, I was honored with the Peter. Their wedding brought us all closer to- Wednesday, December 16, 2009 opportunity to welcome the 83rd Infantry Divi- gether and made us a single family and dear Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Market Garden WWII
    Operation Market Garden WWII Operation Market Garden (17–25 September 1944) was an Allied military operation, fought in the Netherlands and Germany in the Second World War. It was the largest airborne operation up to that time. The operation plan's strategic context required the seizure of bridges across the Maas (Meuse River) and two arms of the Rhine (the Waal and the Lower Rhine) as well as several smaller canals and tributaries. Crossing the Lower Rhine would allow the Allies to outflank the Siegfried Line and encircle the Ruhr, Germany's industrial heartland. It made large-scale use of airborne forces, whose tactical objectives were to secure a series of bridges over the main rivers of the German- occupied Netherlands and allow a rapid advance by armored units into Northern Germany. Initially, the operation was marginally successful and several bridges between Eindhoven and Nijmegen were captured. However, Gen. Horrocks XXX Corps ground force's advance was delayed by the demolition of a bridge over the Wilhelmina Canal, as well as an extremely overstretched supply line, at Son, delaying the capture of the main road bridge over the Meuse until 20 September. At Arnhem, the British 1st Airborne Division encountered far stronger resistance than anticipated. In the ensuing battle, only a small force managed to hold one end of the Arnhem road bridge and after the ground forces failed to relieve them, they were overrun on 21 September. The rest of the division, trapped in a small pocket west of the bridge, had to be evacuated on 25 September. The Allies had failed to cross the Rhine in sufficient force and the river remained a barrier to their advance until the offensives at Remagen, Oppenheim, Rees and Wesel in March 1945.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 111 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 111 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 155 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2009 No. 192 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Saturday, December 19, 2009, at 6 p.m. Senate The Senate met at 10 a.m. and was O God, from whom all noble desires ings, enabling them to see and experi- called to order by the Honorable and all good counsels do proceed, crown ence evidences of Your love. May their KIRSTEN E. GILLIBRAND, a Senator from the deliberations of our lawmakers consistent communication with You the State of New York. with spacious thinking and with sym- radiate in their faces, be expressed in pathy for all humanity. As they face their character, and be exuded in posi- PRAYER perplexing questions, quicken in them tive joy. Sanctify this day of labor The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- every noble impulse, transforming fered the following prayer: their work into a throne of service. with the benediction of Your approval. Let us pray. Lord, shower them with Your bless- We pray in Your great Name. Amen. NOTICE If the 111th Congress, 1st Session, adjourns sine die on or before December 23, 2009, a final issue of the Congres- sional Record for the 111th Congress, 1st Session, will be published on Thursday, December 31, 2009, to permit Members to insert statements. All material for insertion must be signed by the Member and delivered to the respective offices of the Official Reporters of Debates (Room HT–59 or S–123 of the Capitol), Monday through Friday, between the hours of 10:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Hitlers-Last-Days-By-Bill-Oreilly-Excerpt
    207-60729_ch00_6P.indd ii 7/7/15 8:42 AM Henry Holt and Com pany, LLC Publishers since 1866 175 Fifth Ave nue, New York, New York 10010 macteenbooks . com Henry Holt® is a registered trademark of Henry Holt and Com pany, LLC. Copyright © 2015 by Bill O’Reilly All rights reserved. Permission to use the following images is gratefully acknowledged (additional credits are noted with captions): Mary Evans Picture Library— endpapers, pp. ii, v, vi, 35, 135, 248, 251; Bridgeman Art Library— endpapers, p. iii; Heinrich Hoffman/Getty— p. 1. All maps by Gene Thorp. Case design by Meredith Pratt. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data O’Reilly, Bill. Hitler’s last days : the death of the Nazi regime and the world’s most notorious dictator / Bill O’Reilly. — First edition. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-62779-396-4 (hardcover) • ISBN 978-1-62779-397-1 (e- book) 1. Hitler, Adolf, 1889–1945. 2. Hitler, Adolf, 1889–1945— Death and burial. 3. World War, 1939–1945— Campaigns— Germany. 4. Berlin, Battle of, Berlin, Germany, 1945. 5. Heads of state— Germany— Biography. 6. Dictators— Germany— Biography. I. O’Reilly, Bill. Killing Patton. II. Title. DD247.H5O735 2015 943.086092— dc23 2015000562 Henry Holt books may be purchased for business or promotional use. For information on bulk purchases, please contact the Macmillan Corporate and Premium Sales Department at (800) 221-7945 x5442 or by e-mail at specialmarkets@macmillan . com. First edition—2015 / Designed by Meredith Pratt Based on the book Killing Patton by Bill O’Reilly, published by Henry Holt and Com pany, LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • In Our Centennial Year of the Society, Another Great Reunion
    In Our Centennial Year of the Society, Another Great Reunion By Henry Bodden – Editor ur 102nd Anniversary Left, entrance to Jekyll Soldiers Ball, and the Island Resort. 100th Anniversary of the Below, Gabe Guevarra O and Henry Bodden met Society of the Third Infantry in the lobby. Division returned to Fort Stewart, Georgia to celebrate these two events. Most guests to the reunion stayed at the Westin Hotel on the beach at Jekyll Island. Although the weather was overcast and drizzling for the Unfortunately, on Friday of weekend, it was nice to be on the November 15th, a transportation ocean for walks and sightseeing. glitch denied us a tour to the It was nice to reunite with friends Mighty Eight Museum tour, so and new acquaintances as every- some visited the area while oth- one checked in. On Thursday ers congregated in the November the 14th, registration Hospitality Room while awaiting began as members assembled in the much anticipated formal the Hospitality Room for snacks Soldiers Ball that night. So, at uniforms of our Fort Stewart sol- and fellowship. That night we all 5:00 p.m. there was a VIP recep- diers and all the beautiful ladies attended the President’s tion which was followed by a in their formal dress. It was a Reception Dinner with a wel- social hour. As a non-veteran and come and stirring speech by my first Soldiers Ball, I was real- Please turn to REUNION on page 4 Society President Toby Knight. ly impressed with all the dress A Visit With Col.
    [Show full text]
  • OPERATION MARKET- GARDEN 1944 (1) the American Airborne Missions
    OPERATION MARKET- GARDEN 1944 (1) The American Airborne Missions STEVEN J. ZALOGA ILLUSTRATED BY STEVE NOON © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CAMPAIGN 270 OPERATION MARKET- GARDEN 1944 (1) The American Airborne Missions STEVEN J ZALOGA ILLUSTRATED BY STEVE NOON Series editor Marcus Cowper © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 The strategic setting CHRONOLOGY 8 OPPOSING COMMANDERS 9 German commandersAllied commanders OPPOSING FORCES 14 German forcesAllied forces OPPOSING PLANS 24 German plansAllied plans THE CAMPAIGN 32 The southern sector: 101st Airborne Division landingOperation Garden: XXX Corps The Nijmegen sector: 82nd Airborne DivisionGerman reactionsNijmegen Bridge: the first attemptThe demolition of the Nijmegen bridgesGroesbeek attack by Korps FeldtCutting Hell’s HighwayReinforcing the Nijmegen Bridge defenses: September 18Battle for the Nijmegen bridges: September 19Battle for the Nijmegen Railroad Bridge: September 20Battle for the Nijmegen Highway Bridge: September 20Defending the Groesbeek Perimeter: September 20 On to Arnhem?Black Friday: cutting Hell’s HighwayGerman re-assessmentRelieving the 1st Airborne DivisionHitler’s counteroffensive: September 28–October 2 AFTERMATH 87 THE BATTLEFIELD TODAY 91 FURTHER READING 92 INDEX 95 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com The Void: pursuit to the German frontier, August 26 to September 11, 1944 26toSeptember11, August pursuittotheGermanfrontier, Void: The Allied front line, date indicated Armed Forces Nijmegen Netherlands Wesel N German front line, evening XXXX enth Ar ifte my First Fsch September 11, 1944 F XXXX XXX Westwall LXVII 1. Fsch XXX XXXX LXXXVIII 0 50 miles XXX 15 LXXXIX XXX Turnhout 0 50km LXXXVI Dusseldorf Ostend Brugge Antwerp Dunkirk XXX XXX Calais II Ghent XII XXX Cdn Br XXX Cologne GERMANY Br Maastricht First Fsch Brussels XXXX Seventh Bonn Boulognes BELGIUM XXX XXXX 21 Aachen LXXXI 7 XXXX First XXXXX Lille 12 September 4 Liège Cdn XIX XXX XXX XXX North Sea XXXX VII Namur VII LXXIV Second US B Koblenz Br St.
    [Show full text]
  • 598Th Transportation Group Rotterdam, the Netherlands 950Th Transportation Companyinbremerhaven,GE(Page5)
    TRANS TRIBUNE Chronicle of Warrior Logistics in Motion! Volume 8, Number 6, June 2009 IncomIng The 598th Transportation Group welcomes Lt.Col. Riley J. Cheramie the new Commander of the 838th Transportation Battalion in Rotter- dam, NL (Page 4) and Captain Sol A. Velez, the new Interim Commander of the 950th Transportation Company in Bremerhaven, GE (Page 5). Lt.Col. Riley J. Cheramie Captain Sol A. Velez outgoIng The 598th Transportation Group says farewell to Command Sergeant Major James E. Riddick, 598th Trans Gp CSM (Page 2), Lieutenant Colonel(P) James E. Anderson, former Commander of the 838th Trans Bn, and Major Reed, former Commander of the 950th Trans Co. 598th Transportation Group Rotterdam, The Netherlands Cmd. Sgt.Maj. James E. Riddick Lt.Col.(P) James E. Anderson Maj. Scott M. Reed SDDC From the Commander Col. Stephen E. Farmen Commander 598th Trans Gp (SDDC) eam! – the Summer Solstice has passed and we are officially in the Summer TSeason! Again, I could not be prouder of the hard work and efforts of the entire Workforce that continue to make a profound difference across the EUCOM/AF- 598th RICOM areas of responsibility and in support of ongoing contingency operations in Iraq and Afghanistan! Truly remarkable! The Northern Distribution Network continues to serve as a critical lifeline for expanding operations in Afghanistan. In TRANS fact, as we approach the end of June we are about to achieve a significant milestone as container # 1,000 will be successfully delivered to Afghanistan - with over 3000 more booked and in motion…We will continue to grow and expand this of course TRIBUNE and your efforts are not going unnoticed.
    [Show full text]
  • Honorary Regimental Sergeant Major for Over 17 Years
    Once a Devil, always a Devil! That is what you hear around Ardennes every morning, or during the 504th Association Convention. Those that have left the 504th PIR and the veterans that were part of this storied Regiment cherish every moment. Former Brigade Command Sergeant Major, CSM Alexander Barnett, was just a Private when he served with the Blue Devils under former Blue Devils CSM (R) Vincent Myers and former 504th Regimental Sergeant Major Ron Rath. CSM (R) Ron Rath became the Command Sergeant Major of 2nd Battalion, 504th Parachute Infantry Regiment, 82nd Airborne Division in February 1985. He deployed with them to Multinational Force and Observers (Sinai), Golden Pheasant, Just Cause, and Desert Storm. In November 1991, he became the Regimental Sergeant Major for the 504th Parachute Infantry Regiment. Sergeant Major Rath’s career spans over 30 years. After CSM (R) Ron Rath decided to retire, he couldn’t bear staying away from the Regiment so he selflessly served as the Honorary Regimental Sergeant Major for over 17 years. The Blue Devils and White Devils leadership lived the motto; Once a Devil, always a Devil! Former CSM (R) Vincent Myers, who was the Command Sergeant Major of 3-504th PIR, followed CSM (R) Ron Rath steps. CSM (R) Vincent Myers replaced CSM (R) Ron Rath as the 504th PIR Command Sergeant Major in 1994. Just recently, 26 February 2017, CSM (R) Vincent Myers replaced CSM (R) Ron Rath as the Honorary Regimental Sergeant Major. In this article, CSM (R) Vincent Myers shared his experiences with the Blue Devils and the 504th Regiment.
    [Show full text]
  • Letters LT.GEN.THEODORE G
    GEN.GORDON R. SULLIVAN, USA RET. President, AUSA Letters LT.GEN.THEODORE G. STROUP JR., USA RET. Vice President, Education, AUSA Procurement Challenges been able to afford to maintain or gear MARY BLAKE FRENCH Editor in Chief I Richard Hart Sinnreich’s typically up to build what we’ve asked for. LARRY MOFFI Managing Editor logical and readable February “Front & Those less capable companies have ei- PAUL W. BARTELS Art Director Center” article, “Rebuilding America’s ther gone out of business, merged DENNIS STEELE Senior Staff Writer Eroding Defense Industrial Base,” hits with the big guys or refrained from TONI EUGENE Associate Editor JOSEPH L. BRODERICK Production Artist many of the problems facing the tech- bidding on programs that they can’t TENLEY WADSWORTH Assistant Editor nical production side of procurement. produce. So we’ve arrived at a point SARA HOV Assistant Editor Another significant problem relates of almost sole-source production ca- JEREMY DOW Editorial Assistant to the increasing complexity of re- pability for some classes of materiel. Contributing Editors quired new military materiel. Many The solutions are both economical GEN.FREDERICK J. KROESEN, USA RET.; years ago, I twisted a common phrase, infusion, which is implicit in Sinn- MAJ.GEN.EDWARD B. ATKESON, USA RET.; concluding that “invention is the moth- reich’s article, and realistic require- AND SCOTT R. GOURLEY er of necessity.” That was based on wit- ments processes. We need to do both, LT.GEN.THOMAS G. RHAME, USA RET. nessing the successful “sales pitch” and each is difficult to accomplish. Vice President, Finance and approach of some defense industry COL.ROGER MICKELSON, USA RET.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Service Honors Command
    JOINT SERVICE HONORS COMMAND Monthly Newsletter September, 2013 Volume 0913 STATISTICS: AWARDS AND DECORATIONS: August 2013: During this month, we The following awards or decorations were completed 14 solo Honor Services and 1 presented during the month of August 2013. in support of the Navy for a total of 15 services for the Month of August 2013. THE LEGION OF MERIT RIBBON COL Ken Hendrix CHAPLINS CORNER: PATREOTIC POEM: A Prayer for Soldiers Brave warriors, should fate find us in battle, May our cause be just. May our leaders have clear vision. May our courage not falter. May we be triumphant an earn victory as we Battle of the Flag show mercy to our enemies. May our efforts bring lasting peace. May our by Gary Huddleston sacrifice be always appreciated by those we serve. May we return to our loved A protest raged on a courthouse lawn, ones unharmed. Should we be harmed, Round a makeshift stage they charged on, may our wounds heal. Should we perish in the struggle, may God embrace us and Fifteen hundred or more they say, find for us a place in His Kingdom. Had come to burn a flag that day. A boy held up the folded flag, Cursed it, and called it a dirty rag. 1 An old man pushed through the angry crowd, And the boy who had called it a "dirty rag", With a rusty shotgun shouldered proud. Handed the old soldier the folded flag. His uniform jacket was old and tight, So the battle of the flag this day was won He had polished each button shiny and bright.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Combat Effective Divisions in the United States Army
    THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMBAT EFFECTIVE DIVISIONS IN THE UNITED STATES ARMY DURING WORLD WAR II A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University by Peter R. Mansoor, B.S. * * * * * The Ohio State University 1992 Master's Examination Committee: Approved by Allan R. Millett Williamson Murray ~~~ Allan R. Millett Warren R. Van Tine Department of History ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I express sincere appreciation to Dr. Allan R. Millett for his guidance in the preparation of this thesis. I also would like to thank Dr. Williamson Murray and Dr. John F. Guilmartin for their support and encouragement during my research. I gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Richard Sommers and Dr. David Keough at the United States Army Military History Institute in Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania, and Dr. Timothy Nenninger and Dr. Richard Boylan at the Modern Military Records Branch of the National Archives in Suitland, Maryland. Without their professional assistance, I would not have been able to complete the research for this thesis. As always, my wife Jana and daughter Kyle proved to be towers of support, even when daddy "played on the computer" for hours on end. ii VITA February 28, 1960 . Born - New Ulm, Minnesota 1982 . B.S., United States Military Academy, West Point, New York 1982-Present ......... Officer, United States Army PUBLICATIONS "The Defense of the Vienna Bridgehead," Armor 95, no. 1 (Jan.-Feb. 1986): 26-32. "The Second Battle of Sedan, May 1940," Military Review 68, no. 6 (June 1988): 64-75. "The Ten Lean Years, 1930-1940," editor, Armor 96, no.
    [Show full text]