The Korean Pivot and the Return of Great Power Politics in Northeast Asia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Korean Pivot and the Return of Great Power Politics in Northeast Asia AtlanticAtlantic Council Council MILLENNIUMMILLENNIUM LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP PROGRAMPROGRAM THE KOREAN PIVOT AND THE RETURN OF GREAT POWER POLITICS IN NORTHEAST ASIA THE KOREAN PIVOT AND GREAT POWER POLITICS IN NORTHEAST ASIA SUNGTAE JACKY PARK THE KOREAN PIVOT AND THE RETURN OF GREAT POWER POLITICS IN NORTHEAST ASIA SUNGTAE JACKY PARK ISBN: 978-1-61977-978-5 Cover photo credit: Province of British Colombia/Flickr. A South Korean soldier and a US soldier stand guard at the Korean Demilitarized Zone between South Korea and North Korea. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The author is solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. November 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS TENT Executive Summary 1 Introduction 3 Korea: A Shrimp among Whales 3 Future of the Two Koreas and Great Power Politics in Northeast Asia 5 The North Korean Collapse Scenario 8 Unified Korea: Where Europe’s Past Could Become Asia’s Future 11 Korea in US Foreign Policy: A Lynchpin of Peace and Security in the Asia-Pacific 12 A Comprehensive Strategy for Korea 14 Conclusion 18 About the Author 19 THE KOREAN PIVOT AND THE RETURN OF GREAT POWER POLITICS IN NORTHEAST ASIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Korea has been a contested domain among great powers in surrounding North Korea’s future further adds to the Northeast Asia since antiquity. Today, as China reemerges, possibility that the Korean peninsula might turn into a Japan reenergizes, and the United States rebalances toward Asia, the competition over Korea will likely return and rapid change in Korea could trigger interventions by great become a critical issue among the contending powers. powers,sudden flashpoint which could in Northeastattempt to Asia. secure Serious their interestsinstability on or To explore the problem, this report will examine Korea’s the Korean peninsula in unpredictable ways as situations grand strategies toward great powers, discuss the future on the ground change rapidly. of the strategic dynamic on the Korean peninsula, explore the potential North Korean collapse scenario and its Therefore, the United States has an interest in formulating a strategy to reduce great power tension on the Korean the United States. peninsula over the long term. In addition, Washington implications, and finally offer policy recommendations for should seek to subvert the Kim regime at the grassroots Korea is a weak power surrounded by great powers. level and bring about regime change in Pyongyang. While To maintain its security and sovereignty, Korea has any North Korean collapse scenario is likely to be a historically aligned closely with dominant great powers in tumultuous affair, the United States cannot base its North Northeast Asia or has sought to manipulate and navigate Korea policy on the unrealistic premise that the regime, between them. For decades, North Korea has sought to pit great powers against each other while developing nuclear weapons to maximize its autonomy and status. South Korea aboutin its current “when” state, the collapse will remain should stable occur, indefinitely not “whether,” or will (also known as the Republic of Korea or ROK) has pursued becausemake significant the Kim reforms.regime’s Theeventual relevant collapse policy is questionlikely is more subtle strategies to maximize security and stability— inevitable. bandwagoning or hedging depending on circumstances. The full return of great power politics in East Asia could A NORTH KOREAN allow North Korea to better exploit the great power COLLAPSE WILL BE rivalries in the region and prevent the United States and the regional powers from cooperating to deal with Pyongyang. FAR MORE DANGEROUS Furthermore, South Korea’s strategy of hedging might become unsustainable, as pressure to choose between WHEN THE RELATIONSHIP China and the United States increases. In addition to the BETWEEN THE UNITED shifting dynamics on the Korean peninsula, there is also the possibility of the North Korean regime’s sudden demise. STATES AND ITS ALLIES The totalitarian nature of the Kim Jong-un regime AND CHINA WILL combined with its failed economic model means that the HAVE BECOME MORE system is likely to collapse at some point in the future. Moreover, North Korean society has been changing PRECARIOUS IN THE gradually since the famine of 1994–98 with the irreversible introduction of a pervasive black market economy and FUTURE. massive corruption. In the long run, one also cannot rule out the possibility of cracks emerging at the elite level, A North Korean collapse today might be safer and more given Kim Jong-un’s youth and lack of experience. manageable than it would be twenty years from now. A North Korean collapse will be far more dangerous If not carefully managed by the major stakeholders in when the relationship between the United States and its Northeast Asia, the North Korean regime’s demise and allies and China will have become more precarious in the future. As of now, the United States is still powerful consequences. Currently, the United States, China, Japan, enough in Northeast Asia to act as a stabilizer to allow the Russia,subsequent and Southunification Korea could agree have in principle potentially that destabilizing North major powers in the region to settle the Korean question Korea should be denuclearized, that there should be no diplomatically. In the future, the current favorable situation war on the Korean peninsula, and that an abrupt collapse might not exist. Moreover, a collapsing North Korea with of the Kim regime is undesirable. With North Korea’s far more developed nuclear and missile capabilities could demise, a point of consensus on the Korean peninsula crumble with a bang instead with a whimper. Long-term contestation over Korea once again. The element pose significant danger if the Kim regime decides to ofwould unpredictability suddenly disappear, and unintended leading toconsequences intensified regional outweigh the short-term costs. benefits from North Korea’s demise in the near future ATLANTIC COUNCIL 1 THE KOREAN PIVOT AND THE RETURN OF GREAT POWER POLITICS IN NORTHEAST ASIA The United States needs a comprehensive strategy toward 3. The United States needs to maintain strong, but Korea that places the country within the context of strictly bilateral alliances with Japan and South Northeast Asia’s great power politics. The strategy laid out Korea to bolster deterrence against North Korea, in this report consists of four elements. balance China, and manage the region’s numerous political and security issues. The United States 1. President Obama or the next president should should not pursue serious US-Japan-ROK trilateral rally Congress and the American public to increase security cooperation or a trilateral alliance the defense budget to at least 4 percent of the GDP because it would likely be dysfunctional while in order to bolster the rebalance to Asia and to overly antagonizing China. maintain stability and robust deterrence on the Korean peninsula. 4. The United States should convince China to discuss with all relevant parties (the United States, Japan, 2. The United States should have mid-level State Russia, and South Korea) and come to a rough Korea. At the same time, the United States for Northeast Asia’s geopolitical order, what role shouldDepartment seek toofficials subvert engage North in Korea talks andwith bring North Koreacompromise should on play what in the Korean arrangement, unification and means how about regime change by covertly facilitating the the parties involved should cooperate to achieve the desired outcome. the country to empower North Koreans at the grassrootsblack market level. flow of goods and information into 2 ATLANTIC COUNCIL THE KOREAN PIVOT AND THE RETURN OF GREAT POWER POLITICS IN NORTHEAST ASIA INTRODUCTION KOREA: A SHRIMP AMONG Situated at the heart of Northeast Asia, the Korean WHALES peninsula has historically been the pivot of contention An old proverb describing Korea’s unfortunate geopolitical whenever great power competitions emerged in the region. Chinese and Japanese political and military involvement in between whales.” Even today, the two Koreas are surrounded Korea goes back to antiquity; the Mongol invasion of Japan, position says that “a shrimp breaks its back in a fight the only invasion of Japan’s home islands before World War presence in Northeast Asia, China, and Japan respectively), II, came through Korea in 1274 and 1281; the second major andby the Russia, world’s which first, is second, still a great and militarythird largest power. economies To survive (US in between 1592 and 1598. During the modern era, three closely with dominant great powers in the region or has majorconflict wars, between the First China Sino-Japanese and Japan was War fought (1894–1895), in Korea soughtsuch a difficultto manipulate environment, and navigate Korea between has traditionally them in pursuitaligned the Russo-Japanese War (1904–1905), and the Korean of security and sovereignty. War (1950–1953), broke out over the status of Korea. As China reemerges, Japan reenergizes, and the United States During the pre-modern era, Korea, particularly during the Joseon period (1392–1897), accommodated and aligned the region, the Korean question will inevitably return. with China. The Sino-Korean relationship has always been rebalances to Asia to compete for influence and security in uneasy, but nominally acknowledging the China-centered Yet, compared to other Asia-related topics, discussions world order ensured Korea’s sovereignty and allowed the about the Korean peninsula’s place in Northeast Asia’s country to maintain its culture and identity. Nonetheless, great power politics are relatively few and far between Korea has not always been a pliant tributary state. Early in the Washington policy community. Debates on the Korean kingdoms often challenged and went to war with region’s great power relations almost always focus on the far more powerful Chinese dynasties and northern tribal United States, China, Japan, and occasionally Russia.
Recommended publications
  • Introduction to Korean History by Charles
    HIST 108: Introduction to East Asian History – Korea Spring 2017 Charles Kim (University of Wisconsin-Madison) The Cheonggye Stream in Seoul: From the turn of the 20th century to the early 21st century Course Description: Korea has a long and rich history that provides a unique vantage point for understanding major processes in East Asia and the world. This course explores Korean history from the fourteenth century to the present. The first part of the course delves into Confucian social changes during the Joseon (Chosŏn) Dynasty (1392- 1910). The second part focuses on social realities for Koreans under Japanese colonial rule (1910-1945). The final part turns to the contemporary era (1945 to present) to shed light on national division, social movements, and everyday life in South Korea and North Korea. Course Objectives: 1) Acquire a solid understanding of the major eras, political events, social realities, and intellectual trends in Korean history, 1392 to present. 2) Hone your ability to identify historically significant information in primary sources, short stories, and films. 3) Engage in historical thinking. 4) Make connections between texts, course topics, and broader issues of the past and present—within and beyond Korea. 5) Learn interactively. Required Texts: Kyung Moon Hwang, A History of Korea: An Episodic Narrative, 2nd ed. (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017). Referred to in Course Schedule as “Hwang.” Other readings and films will be made available for students to view electronically on or through Canvas on Learn@UW: https://learnuw.wisc.edu/ Course Requirements: 1) Participation: 13% 2) Facilitate Discussion: 2% (A number of you may end up doing this with a partner).
    [Show full text]
  • North Korea and the Subversive Truth Andrei Lankov by All Rational
    North Korea and the Subversive Truth Andrei Lankov By all rational measures, North Korea is the model of a “failed state.” The country is the poorest in East Asia, with a populace that struggles to survive on an annual income between some $500 and $1,200. Despite this economic catastrophe, the North Korean regime is itself a master survivor, a living fossil whose political system is a vestige of Stalinism. Since the early 1990s, many observers have predicted the regime’s imminent collapse, but Pyongyang has consistently outmaneuvered its more powerful adversaries while keeping its starving populace docile. The survival strategy followed by the North Korean regime rests upon a simple but effective imperative: control information at all costs. Above all, the leadership in Pyongyang understands that the North Korean people must never be exposed to the outside world. If this happens, the North Koreans would discover that their country is not the “people’s paradise” and “envy of the world” described in the regime’s propaganda. Indeed, if North Korean commoners ever learned about the true prosperity of their South Korean cousins, and if they became less afraid of the government’s wrath, they would do what East Germans once did: they would demand unification on South Korean terms, discarding the Pyongyang ruling elite to the proverbial “waste bin of history. ” The North Korean masses are thus watched and terrorized, even at the price of perennial economic failure. North Koreans are not allowed to interact with foreigners, including citizens of supposedly “friendly countries,” in any form without clear authorization.
    [Show full text]
  • Gendered Rhetoric in North Korea's International
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection 1954-2016 University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2015 Gendered rhetoric in North Korea’s international relations (1946–2011) Amanda Kelly Anderson University of Wollongong Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses University of Wollongong Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorise you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised, without the permission of the author. Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the University of Wollongong. Recommended Citation Anderson, Amanda Kelly, Gendered rhetoric in North Korea’s international relations (1946–2011), Doctor of Philosophy thesis, School of Humanities and Social Inquiry, University of Wollongong, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Korean Studies Program
    korean studies program university of michigan fall 2006 director’s note koryo saram-the unreliable people, premiers in the fall I am happy to report that Koryo Saram-The Unreliable People, every Korean who was connected to the Comintern. One cannot a one-hour documentary created by the Korean Studies Program help wondering what would have happened to modern Korean (KSP) will make its international premier at the Smithsonian history if one or more factor had changed. For instance, if the Institution’s Sackler Gallery in Washington DC on October 29. Korean communist leadership in the Soviet Union had not This documentary, which has taken two years to make, is the perished in the Great Terror, would it not have been parachuted result of an extensive collaboration between units in the into North Korea by the Soviets in the aftermath of World War II? International Institute and within the university. We were fortu- Would someone from the ranks of the Comintern-connected nate to have access to some of the lowest paid but highest skilled Koreans have ruled the roost in North Korea and not Kim Il workers to be found in the country: the UROP (Undergraduate Sung? If so, is it possible that North Korea might have ended Research and Opportunity Program) and work-study students up looking more like a garden-variety Soviet satellite, rather than who streamed in and out of the KSP offices on the third floor what it became, a beleaguered nationalist regime held together of the International Institute. These individuals worked on by a cult of personality? a multitude of tasks: sorting through primary documents and The answers, it turned out, were not only unanswerable, film footage in Russian, Korean and English; translating oral but un-researchable.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrei Lankov FORGOTTEN PEOPLE: the KOREANS of THE
    Andrei Lankov FORGOTTEN PEOPLE: THE KOREANS OF THE SAKHALIN ISLAND IN 1945-1991 In early spring 1946, hundreds of Korean miners and fishers came to a small port city of Korsakov, located in the sounthernmost part of the Sakhalin island. Southern Sakhalin just changed ownership: after 40 years of the Japanese rule, its territory was retaken by the Russians, so local Japanese were moving back to their native islands. Koreans came to Korsakov because rumors which insisted: ships would soon arrive to take all Koreans from Sakhalin back home, to southern provinces of newly independent Korea. Those who came to Korsakov wanted to be first to board these ships. However, ships never came. This was, in a sense, a sign of things to come. The Sakhalin Koreans found themselves locked at the island in 1945 (much against their will) and for long time they hoped for some miracle which will let them return to their homes. This miracle did happen eventually, but only when it was too late for most of them, and when their children and grandchildren had completely different ideas about how life should be lived. The present article is largely based on the material which were collected during the author’s trip to Sakhalin in 2009. In recent years the local historians have produced a number of high- quality studies of the Sakhalin Koran community and its history. Unfortunately, these through and interesting studies are not well-known even in Russia outside the island, let alone overseas. The present article is based on the notes and materials provided by the Sakhalin historians and activists, as well as on some publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Songbun North Korea’S Social Classification System
    Marked for Life: Songbun North Korea’s Social Classification System A Robert Collins Marked for Life: SONGBUN, North Korea’s Social Classification System Marked for Life: Songbun North Korea’s Social Classification System Robert Collins The Committee for Human Rights in North Korea 1001 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 435, Washington, DC 20036 202-499-7973 www.hrnk.org Copyright © 2012 by the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 0985648007 Library of Congress Control Number: 2012939299 Marked for Life: SONGBUN, North Korea’s Social Classification System Robert Collins The Committee for Human Rights in North Korea 1001 Connecticut Ave. NW Suite 435 Washington DC 20036 (202) 499-7973 www.hrnk.org BOARD OF DIRECTORS, Jack David Committee for Human Rights in Senior Fellow and Trustee, Hudson Institute North Korea Paula Dobriansky Former Under Secretary of State for Democ- Roberta Cohen racy and Global Affairs Co-Chair, Non-Resident Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution Nicholas Eberstadt Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute Andrew Natsios Co-Chair, Carl Gershman Walsh School of Foreign Service Georgetown President, National Endowment for Democracy University, Former Administrator, USAID David L. Kim Gordon Flake The Asia Foundation Co-Vice-Chair, Executive Director, Maureen and Mike Mans- Steve Kahng field Foundation General Partner, 4C Ventures, Inc. Suzanne Scholte Katrina Lantos Swett Co-Vice-Chair, President, Lantos Foundation for Human Rights Chairman, North Korea Freedom Coalition and Justice John Despres Thai Lee Treasurer, President and CEO, SHI International Corp. Consultant, International Financial and Strate- Debra Liang-Fenton gic Affairs Former Executive Director, Committee for Hu- Helen-Louise Hunter man Rights in North Korea, Secretary, The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • New Evidence on North Korea in 1956
    Cold War International History Project Bulletin, Issue 16 New Evidence on North Korea in 1956 Introduction by James F. Person ew events since the end of the 1950-1953 Korean War contrast, concludes that the attack on Kim Il Sung’s policies at have had such enduring political relevance in the 60-year the August Plenum “was a desperate attempt to turn the tide Fhistory of the North Korean party-state as the three-year rather than a serious challenge to Kim’s rule.”5 dispute in the Korean Workers’ Party (KWP) over development The documentary evidence on post-war North Korea has strategies that culminated in the summer of 1956. Yet, due to the been greatly enhanced recently through the release of docu- secretive nature of the regime and the paucity of documentary ments at the Russian State Archive of Contemporary History evidence from Korean and other archives, little has been known (RGANI), the post-Stalin Central Committee archive. These about this pivotal event until recently. While accounts of the epi- documents, some of which are presented below, originated sode have appeared in many histories of modern Korea,1 they with the Central Committee Department for Relations with have largely focused on the August 1956 Plenum of the KWP International Communist Parties, the Communist Party of the Central Committee (CC), which is generally portrayed as the Soviet Union’s (CPSU) own foreign policy organ.6 Some of climax of a decade-long power struggle between four factions: the documents were also analyzed by Japanese scholar Nobuo the so-called “Soviet faction” composed of ethnic Koreans who Shimotomai, who accessed them in microfilm copy at the Slavic lived in the Soviet Union and were sent to serve in administra- Research Center in Hokkaido, Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Real North Korea This Page Intentionally Left Blank the Real North Korea
    The Real North Korea This page intentionally left blank The Real North Korea Life and Politics in the Failed Stalinist Utopia ANDREI LANKOV 1 1 Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Th ailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries. Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 © 2013 Andrei Lankov All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above. You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lankov, A. N. (Andrei Nikolaevich) Th e real North Korea : life and politics in the failed Stalinist utopia / Andrei Lankov.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting North Korean Reform; Changing the North with a New Strategy
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Dissertations and Theses City College of New York 2014 Predicting North Korean Reform; Changing the North with a New Strategy Won Ju Kim CUNY City College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cc_etds_theses/293 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Predicting North Korean Reform: Changing the North with a New Strategy Won Ju Kim May 2014 Master's Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of International Affairs at the City College of New York Advisor: Dr. Jean Krasno Table of Contents Abstract Chapter I: Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 1. Intro .................................................................................................................... 1 2. Research Question ............................................................................................. 2 3. Methodology ...................................................................................................... 3 4. Limitations ......................................................................................................... 4 5. Thesis Statement ................................................................................................ 4 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Andrei Lankov the RISE of CHINA and KOREAN UNIFICATION The
    Andrei Lankov THE RISE OF CHINA AND KOREAN UNIFICATION The rise of China can be seen as the single most important strategic problem which Korea faces currently. In the late 1970s, China entered a phase of high-speed economic growth, which still seems to be almost unstoppable. According to World Bank estimates, the average annual increase in China’s GDP in the years 2000-2009 was 9.7%. This is the world’s highest growth rate. Perhaps for the first time in modern history, the country which has the highest growth rate is the country with the largest population. The future of Korea depends on its ability to find how to handle the Chinese challenge. It is going to be difficult, but there are hopeful signs, too: Chinese political elite may be remarkably realist, even Machiavellian, in their outlook but also rational and averse to adventurism. This gives Korea some hope that compromises with China will be possible. Without such compromises no unification of Korea will be possible in a new world where China is bound to be a major player. Korean Unification: What Does China Want? What are the goals of China on the Korean peninsula, and how can these goals be reconciled with the national interests of Korea? It appears that Chinese interests on the Korean peninsula form a strict hierarchy. China needs: first, a stable Korean peninsula; second, a divided Korean peninsula; third a non-nuclear Korean peninsula. These goals are hierarchical: from the Chinese point of view, stability is more important than division, while division is more important than denuclearization.
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions
    TRANSACTIONS ROYAL ASIATIC SOCIETY Korea Branch Volume 86 – 2011 COVER: The seal-shaped emblem of the RAS-KB consists of the following Chinese characters: 槿 (top right), 域 (bottom right), 菁 (top left), 莪 (bottom left), pronounced Kŭn yŏk Ch’ŏng A in Korean. The first two characters mean “the hibiscus region,” referring to Korea, while the other two (“luxuriant mugwort”) are a metaphor inspired by Confucian commentaries on the Chinese Book of Odes, and could be translated as “enjoy encouraging erudition.” SUBMISSIONS: Transactions invites the submission of manuscripts of both scholarly and more general interest pertaining to the anthropology, archeology, art, history, language, literature, philosophy, and religion of Korea. Manuscripts should be prepared in MS Word format and should be submitted as 2 hard copies printed double-spaced on A4 paper and in digital form. The style should conform to The Chicago Manual of Style (most recent edition). The covering letter should give full details of the author’s name, address and biography. Romanization of Korean words and names must follow either the McCune-Reischauer or the current Korean government system. Submissions will be peer-reviewed by two readers specializing in the field. Manuscripts will not be returned and no correspondence will be entered into concerning rejections. Transactions (ISSN 1229-0009) Copyright © 2012 Royal Asiatic Society – Korea Branch CPO Box 255, Seoul 100-602, Republic of Korea Tel.: (82-2) 763-9483; Fax: (82-2) 766-3796; email: [email protected] Visit our website at www.raskb.com TRANSACTIONS of the ROYAL ASIATIC SOCIETY KOREA BRANCH Volume 86 – 2011 Contents My 45 years with the RASKB Bae Sue Ja 1 Back to the Past: A Visit to North Korea in October 2011 J.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Soviet Influence on the Formation of the North Korean Army
    A Study of Soviet Influence on the Formation of the North Korean Army Fyodor Tertitskiy Acta Koreana, Volume 20, Number 1, June 2017, pp. 195-219 (Article) Published by Keimyung University, Academia Koreana For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/756480 [ Access provided at 25 Sep 2021 14:03 GMT with no institutional affiliation ] ACTA KOR ANA VOL. 20, NO. 1, JUNE 2017: 195–219 doi:10.18399/acta.2017.20.1.009 © Academia Koreana, Keimyung University, 2017 A STUDY OF SOVIET INFLUENCE ON THE FORMATION OF THE NORTH KOREAN ARMY By FYODOR TERTITSKIY This article examines the influence of Soviet Army experience and tradition on the formation of the army of North Korea in the late 1940s–1950s. As North Korea itself was born out of the Soviet occupation zone, the USSR exercised a strong influence and the Korean People’s Army was largely shaped in the Soviet image. The author analyses North Korean military regulations, unit structure, ranks, the political officer system and Party organisations in the army. The article’s findings are that the KPA was moulded according to the Soviet model, borrowing elements of its structure from different eras of Soviet history, including those that predated the creation of the North Korean state. Although some elements of its Soviet origin disappeared over time, it would not be an exaggeration to say the North Korean army is still a Soviet-type one.∗ Keywords: Korean People’s Army, North Korean army, Red Army, Soviet-North Korean relations The army plays an extremely important role in North Korean politics and society.
    [Show full text]