DOCSLIB.ORG

A Stable Cenozoic Geologic Time Scale Is Indispensable Amos Salvador

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Stable Cenozoic Geologic Time Scale Is Indispensable Amos Salvador Reprinted from Episodes (2006, v. 29, no. 1, p. 43-45) GeoArabia, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2006. Gulf PetroLink, Bahrain A stable Cenozoic geologic time scale is indispensable Amos Salvador stable, standard geologic time scale is review covers 19 journals of extensive distribution, A indispensable for the clear and precise plus a considerable number of geologic maps, time communication among geologists; it is a basic tool scales, geology textbooks and the GeoRef. Together of geologic work. Considerable progress has been with an additional investigation of the mid‑20th made to achieve such a stable time scale. However, century geologic literature, it clearly reveals that during the last few years several proposals have the geologic time scale most widely accepted and been made to modify the Cenozoic section of the used has the Cenozoic Erathem/Era comprising the geologic time scale that threaten to destabilize it. Tertiary and the Quaternary systems/periods, with Seven articles published in Episodes since 2000 the Tertiary comprising the Paleogene and Neogene that could contribute to this destabilization are subsystems/subperiods. The Paleogene includes the discussed. They provide excellent examples of the Paleocene, Eocene, and Oligocene series/epochs, profusion of different terminologies, hierarchies, the Neogene comprises the Miocene and Pliocene and stratigraphic relationships that have been series/epochs, and the Quaternary includes the proposed: to eliminate the Tertiary and the Pleistocene and Holocene series/epochs (Figure 1). Quaternary or to raise their rank to suberathems; to extend the Neogene to the present, to make the However, during the last few years several Quaternary a formal subsystem of the Neogene, proposals have been made to modify this widely or consider it an informal stratigraphic unit; to accepted Cenozoic time scale, each contributing in eliminate the Holocene, and to decouple the base of different ways to destabilize it. Only those proposals the Pleistocene from the base of the Quaternary. If published in Episodes during the last 6 years will adopted, these proposals would cause nothing but be discussed in this note. They provide an excellent great confusion and controversy. They disregard example of the profusion of different terminologies, the clear preferences of geologists the world over as hierarchies and stratigraphic relationships proposed reflected by the terminology they have been using to modify the Cenozoic time scale. for many decades. Common sense would dictate the continued use of this terminology in its current, Proposed modifications to the Cenozoic widely accepted form. time scale INTRODUCTION Gradstein (2000) presented a Cenozoic time scale in which the Tertiary was eliminated and the Cenozoic There is no doubt that a stable standard geologic is shown as composed of the Paleogene, Neogene time scale – an international Standard Global and Quaternary systems/periods. Chronostratigraphic (Geochronologic) Scale – with precise numerical dates for its units and their Gradstein and Ogg (2002) and Gradstein et al. boundaries, to which every geologist in the world (2004) offered Cenozoic time scales in which both can refer, is a basic tool of geology, and indispensable the Tertiary and the Quaternary were left out, the for the advancement of geologic studies. Such a scale Cenozoic including the Paleogene and Neogene makes it possible for all geologists to communicate clearly and precisely among themselves and, as Erathem System and Subsystem Series a result, to cooperate effectively in working to (Era) (Period and Subperiod) (Epoch) decipher the geologic history of the Earth. Holocene Quaternary Notable progress has been made during the last 50 Pleistocene years in reaching such a stable standard geologic Neogene Pliocene time scale thanks to the work of the International Cenozoic Miocene Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS) of the IUGS. Tertiary Oligocene Paleogene Eocene Regarding the Cenozoic time scale, the current Paleocene preference of the vast majority of geologists has been documented by an extensive review of the geologic Figure 1: The most widely accepted Cenozoic literature published since 1980 (Salvador, 2006). This time scale in current use. 155 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/11/4/155/4565356/salvador.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Salvador systems/periods, and the Neogene extending To eliminate the Tertiary and the Quaternary from to the present. Ogg (2004) also extended the the Cenozoic time scale clearly ignores reality. Neogene to the present but stated (p. 126) that the As systems of the Cenozoic Erathem, they are Quaternary “remains a very useful climate‑based too deeply rooted in the geologic literature to be chronostratigraphic term” that would be defined willfully eradicated. “as a ‘composite epoch’ (equal to the Holocene and Pleistocene epochs plus the Gelasian stage of As I recently documented (Salvador, 2006), Tertiary the Pliocene; or simply the geologic time interval is a stratigraphic term that has been used, and ‘younger than 2.6 Ma’)”. He added (p. 126): “This continues to be extensively used, with the same ‘composite epoch’ would have no formal placement meaning in all countries and regions of the world in the hierarchy of chronostratigraphic units”. from which I obtained information. Since 1980, Tertiary was used in the title, time scales, or in the Pillans (2004) also proposed to eliminate the Tertiary, legends of maps and cross sections of 3,037 articles and to extend the Neogene System to the present. in the 19 geologic journals reviewed. In the last 10 He retained the Quaternary as a formal subsystem years, 1,257 articles used Tertiary (Salvador, 2006, of the Neogene and included in it the Gelasian Stage p. 25). Tertiary was used in all geologic maps I of the Pliocene and the Pleistocene and Holocene reviewed, and in the vast majority of time scales. series. Aubry et al. (2005) presented a Cenozoic time In all cases, Tertiary was used as the lower system/ scale that includes the Tertiary and the Quaternary period of the Cenozoic Erathem/Era. as sub‑erathems/sub‑eras of the Cenozoic Erathem/ Era ‑ thus acknowledging the universal acceptance Past attempts to abandon the Tertiary have been and use of the Tertiary and the Quaternary by ignored. Recent attempts will also be ignored. The geologists from around the world. The Paleogene Tertiary has been, and continues to be, an extremely and the Neogene were shown as systems/periods, useful stratigraphic unit for discussing and with the Neogene extending to the present. The mapping stratigraphy at a local or regional scale, Holocene was apparently eliminated as the upper in surface or subsurface studies, in biostratigraphy, series of the Quaternary/Neogene. The base of the magnetostratigraphy, sequence stratigraphy and Quaternary was decoupled from the base of the many other fields of stratigraphic investigation. The Pleistocene, and the Quaternary, a unit of superior use of Tertiary by geologists from all over the world rank was shown as contained entirely within the has not declined in the last 25 years and does not Neogene, a unit of inferior rank. look like it is going to anytime soon. The Tertiary has passed with high marks the test of use over Finally, Suguio et al. (2005) proposed to eliminate the time. This is the reality of the status of the Tertiary in Tertiary and the Quaternary, to extend the Neogene stratigraphic terminology. to the present including the Miocene, Pliocene, and Pleistocene but also omitting the Holocene and Gradstein and Ogg (2002) Gradstein Gradstein et al. (2004) Pillans Aubry et al. Suguio et al. extending the Pleistocene to the present. They added (2000) Ogg (2004) (2004) (2005) (2005) (p. 199) that it may be possible “to consider the Quaternary as an informal chronostratigraphic unit, RY RY HOLOC. HOLOC. HOLOC. whose beginning could be located at the base of the OCENE ? ? ? . Gelasian Stage, coincident with the commencement TERNA TERNA T. QUA of the Pleistocene Epoch at about 2.6 My”. Figure PLEIST PLEIST PLEIST PLEIST PLEIST QUA 2 shows the subdivisions by different authors QUA mentioned above. NEOGENE NEOGENE NEOGENE Are these proposed modifications PLIOCENE PLIOCENE PLIOCENE PLIOCENE PLIOCENE sensible and necessary? NEOGENE NEOGENE Y This profusion of proposals for different TIAR terminologies, hierarchies, and stratigraphic MIOCENE MIOCENE MIOCENE MIOCENE MIOCENE relationships does not help to achieve a stable, TER standard geologic time scale for the Cenozoic, particularly because most of the proposals ignore the terminology, hierarchies, and stratigraphic LEOGENE LEOGENE LEOGENE LEOGENE LEOGENE OLIGOCENE OLIGOCENE OLIGOCENE OLIGOCENE OLIGOCENE relationships that geologists worldwide have PA PA PA PA PA accepted and used for many decades, and continue Figure 2: The subdivision of Cenozoic time scale by to use today. different authors. 156 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/11/4/155/4565356/salvador.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 A stable Cenozoic geologic time scale is indispensable In the review of the geological literature mentioned the geologic literature (Salvador, 2006), none of the above, I also found that Paleogene and Neogene publications extended the Neogene to the present. have seen increasing use during the last 25 years, mostly as sub‑systems/sub‑periods of the Tertiary So what would be preferable? System/Period, but also as systems of the Cenozoic when Tertiary has not been used. This
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cambrian Phytoplankton of the Brunovistulicum – Taxonomy and Biostratigraphy
    MONIKA JACHOWICZ-ZDANOWSKA Cambrian phytoplankton of the Brunovistulicum – taxonomy and biostratigraphy Polish Geological Institute Special Papers,28 WARSZAWA 2013 CONTENTS Introduction...........................................................6 Geological setting and lithostratigraphy.............................................8 Summary of Cambrian chronostratigraphy and acritarch biostratigraphy ...........................13 Review of previous palynological studies ...........................................17 Applied techniques and material studied............................................18 Biostratigraphy ........................................................23 BAMA I – Pulvinosphaeridium antiquum–Pseudotasmanites Assemblage Zone ....................25 BAMA II – Asteridium tornatum–Comasphaeridium velvetum Assemblage Zone ...................27 BAMA III – Ichnosphaera flexuosa–Comasphaeridium molliculum Assemblage Zone – Acme Zone .........30 BAMA IV – Skiagia–Eklundia campanula Assemblage Zone ..............................39 BAMA V – Skiagia–Eklundia varia Assemblage Zone .................................39 BAMA VI – Volkovia dentifera–Liepaina plana Assemblage Zone (Moczyd³owska, 1991) ..............40 BAMA VII – Ammonidium bellulum–Ammonidium notatum Assemblage Zone ....................40 BAMA VIII – Turrisphaeridium semireticulatum Assemblage Zone – Acme Zone...................41 BAMA IX – Adara alea–Multiplicisphaeridium llynense Assemblage Zone – Acme Zone...............42 Regional significance of the biostratigraphic
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 30. Latest Oligocene Through Early Miocene Isotopic Stratigraphy
    Shackleton, N.J., Curry, W.B., Richter, C., and Bralower, T.J. (Eds.), 1997 Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, Vol. 154 30. LATEST OLIGOCENE THROUGH EARLY MIOCENE ISOTOPIC STRATIGRAPHY AND DEEP-WATER PALEOCEANOGRAPHY OF THE WESTERN EQUATORIAL ATLANTIC: SITES 926 AND 9291 B.P. Flower,2 J.C. Zachos,2 and E. Martin3 ABSTRACT Stable isotopic (d18O and d13C) and strontium isotopic (87Sr/86Sr) data generated from Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Sites 926 and 929 on Ceara Rise provide a detailed chemostratigraphy for the latest Oligocene through early Miocene of the western Equatorial Atlantic. Oxygen isotopic data based on the benthic foraminifer Cibicidoides mundulus exhibit four distinct d18O excursions of more than 0.5ä, including event Mi1 near the Oligocene/Miocene boundary from 23.9 to 22.9 Ma and increases at about 21.5, 18 and 16.5 Ma, probably reßecting episodes of early Miocene Antarctic glaciation events (Mi1a, Mi1b, and Mi2). Carbon isotopic data exhibit well-known d13C increases near the Oligocene/Miocene boundary (~23.8 to 22.6 Ma) and near the early/middle Miocene boundary (~17.5 to 16 Ma). Strontium isotopic data reveal an unconformity in the Hole 926A sequence at about 304 meters below sea ßoor (mbsf); no such unconformity is observed at Site 929. The age of the unconfor- mity is estimated as 17.9 to 16.3 Ma based on a magnetostratigraphic calibration of the 87Sr/86Sr seawater curve, and as 17.4 to 15.8 Ma based on a biostratigraphic calibration. Shipboard biostratigraphic data are more consistent with the biostratigraphic calibration.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological-Geomorphological and Paleontological Heritage in the Algarve (Portugal) Applied to Geotourism and Geoeducation
    land Article Geological-Geomorphological and Paleontological Heritage in the Algarve (Portugal) Applied to Geotourism and Geoeducation Antonio Martínez-Graña 1,* , Paulo Legoinha 2 , José Luis Goy 1, José Angel González-Delgado 1, Ildefonso Armenteros 1, Cristino Dabrio 3 and Caridad Zazo 4 1 Department of Geology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain; [email protected] (J.L.G.); [email protected] (J.A.G.-D.); [email protected] (I.A.) 2 GeoBioTec, Department of Earth Sciences, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Caparica, 2829-516 Almada, Portugal; [email protected] 3 Department of Stratigraphy, Faculty of Geology, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 4 Department of Geology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, 28006 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-923294496 Abstract: A 3D virtual geological route on Digital Earth of the geological-geomorphological and paleontological heritage in the Algarve (Portugal) is presented, assessing the geological heritage of nine representative geosites. Eighteen quantitative parameters are used, weighing the scientific, didactic and cultural tourist interest of each site. A virtual route has been created in Google Earth, with overlaid georeferenced cartographies, as a field guide for students to participate and improve their learning. This free application allows loading thematic georeferenced information that has Citation: Martínez-Graña, A.; previously been evaluated by means of a series of parameters for identifying the importance and Legoinha, P.; Goy, J.L.; interest of a geosite (scientific, educational and/or tourist). The virtual route allows travelling from González-Delgado, J.A.; Armenteros, one geosite to another, interacting in real time from portable devices (e.g., smartphone and tablets), I.; Dabrio, C.; Zazo, C.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of Natural History
    Timeline of natural history This timeline of natural history summarizes significant geological and Life timeline Ice Ages biological events from the formation of the 0 — Primates Quater nary Flowers ←Earliest apes Earth to the arrival of modern humans. P Birds h Mammals – Plants Dinosaurs Times are listed in millions of years, or Karo o a n ← Andean Tetrapoda megaanni (Ma). -50 0 — e Arthropods Molluscs r ←Cambrian explosion o ← Cryoge nian Ediacara biota – z ←Earliest animals o ←Earliest plants i Multicellular -1000 — c Contents life ←Sexual reproduction Dating of the Geologic record – P r The earliest Solar System -1500 — o t Precambrian Supereon – e r Eukaryotes Hadean Eon o -2000 — z o Archean Eon i Huron ian – c Eoarchean Era ←Oxygen crisis Paleoarchean Era -2500 — ←Atmospheric oxygen Mesoarchean Era – Photosynthesis Neoarchean Era Pong ola Proterozoic Eon -3000 — A r Paleoproterozoic Era c – h Siderian Period e a Rhyacian Period -3500 — n ←Earliest oxygen Orosirian Period Single-celled – life Statherian Period -4000 — ←Earliest life Mesoproterozoic Era H Calymmian Period a water – d e Ectasian Period a ←Earliest water Stenian Period -4500 — n ←Earth (−4540) (million years ago) Clickable Neoproterozoic Era ( Tonian Period Cryogenian Period Ediacaran Period Phanerozoic Eon Paleozoic Era Cambrian Period Ordovician Period Silurian Period Devonian Period Carboniferous Period Permian Period Mesozoic Era Triassic Period Jurassic Period Cretaceous Period Cenozoic Era Paleogene Period Neogene Period Quaternary Period Etymology of period names References See also External links Dating of the Geologic record The Geologic record is the strata (layers) of rock in the planet's crust and the science of geology is much concerned with the age and origin of all rocks to determine the history and formation of Earth and to understand the forces that have acted upon it.
    [Show full text]
  • 21. BRYOZOA from SITE 282 WEST of TASMANIA Robin E
    21. BRYOZOA FROM SITE 282 WEST OF TASMANIA Robin E. Wass and J. J. Yoo, Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Sydney, Australia ABSTRACT More than 15,000 bryozoan fragments have been identified from 17 samples in the late Miocene and late Pleistocene sediments at Site 282, Leg 29, Deep Sea Drilling Project, off the west coast of Tas- mania (lat 42°14.76'S, long 143°29.18'E). Bryozoa are referable to the Orders Cyclostomata and Cheilostomata and represent 79 species belonging to 48 genera. Both late Miocene and late Pleisto- cene assemblages are closely related to assemblages found in the Tertiary of southern Australia, and the Recent of the southern Aus- tralian continental shelf. INTRODUCTION The bryozoan fauna is small relative to that found in the late Pleistocene sediments and relative to records of Recent and Tertiary bryozoan faunas from southern late Miocene Bryozoa from southeastern Australia. The Australia have been documented for more than a late Miocene Bryozoa in the Tertiary of southeastern century. The dominant works have been by MacGilli- Australia are also greatly diminished when compared vray (1879, 1895), Maplestone (1898), Stach (1933), and with the middle Miocene faunas. Few studies have been Brown (1958). Brown's monograph (1952) on the New made of Pliocene bryozoa in southeastern Australia, but Zealand Tertiary Bryozoa, recorded genera and species apparently bryozoans are fewer in number than in the from the Recent and Tertiary of southern Australia. late Miocene. While a great deal of work has been done, there are still The fauna observed at Site 282 is composed almost a large number of studies which have to be completed entirely of four zoarial types—catenicelliform, cellari- before the bryozoan faunas are properly understood.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Gssps Render Dual Time-Rock/Time Classification and Nomenclature Redundant?
    Do GSSPs render dual time-rock/time classification and nomenclature redundant? Ismael Ferrusquía-Villafranca1 Robert M. Easton2 and Donald E. Owen3 1Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, México, DF, MEX, 45100, e-mail: [email protected] 2Ontario Geological Survey, Precambrian Geoscience Section, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, B7064 Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5, e-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Geology, Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas 77710, e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The Geological Society of London Proposal for “…ending the distinction between the dual stratigraphic terminology of time-rock units (of chronostratigraphy) and geologic time units (of geochronology). The long held, but widely misunderstood distinc- tion between these two essentially parallel time scales has been rendered unnecessary by the adoption of the global stratotype sections and points (GSSP-golden spike) principle in defining intervals of geologic time within rock strata.” Our review of stratigraphic princi- ples, concepts, models and paradigms through history clearly shows that the GSL Proposal is flawed and if adopted will be of disservice to the stratigraphic community. We recommend the continued use of the dual stratigraphic terminology of chronostratigraphy and geochronology for the following reasons: (1) time-rock (chronostratigraphic) and geologic time (geochronologic) units are conceptually different; (2) the subtended time-rock’s unit space between its “golden spiked-marked”
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Serravallian Stage (Middle Miocene)
    152 152 Articles by F.J. Hilgen1, H.A. Abels1, S. Iaccarino2, W. Krijgsman3, I. Raffi4, R. Sprovieri5, E. Turco2 and W.J. Zachariasse1 The Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) of the Serravallian Stage (Middle Miocene) 1Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected] 2Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Parma, Parma, Italy. 3Paleomagnetic Laboratory “Fort Hoofddijk”, Budapestlaan 17, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands. 4Dipartimento di Geotecnologie per l’Ambiente e il Territorio, Università “G. d’Annunzio”, Chieti, Italy. 5Dipartimento di Geologia e Gedesia della Terra, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy. The Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for point in a continuous marine section facilitates communication among the Base of the Serravallian Stage (Middle Miocene) is Earth Scientists as it permits to export the boundary as a timeline away from the GSSP, using multiple stratigraphic tools. defined in the Ras il Pellegrin section located in the During the last decade, much progress has been made in the coastal cliffs along the Fomm Ir-Rih Bay on the west Neogene by defining GSSPs of the Zanclean (Van Couvering et al., coast of Malta (35°54'50"N, 14°20'10"E). The GSSP is 2000), Piacenzian (Castradori et al., 1998) and Gelasian (Rio et al., at the base of the Blue Clay Formation (i.e., top of the 1998) Stages of the Pliocene, and the Messininan and Tortonian Stages transitional bed of the uppermost Globigerina of the (Upper) Miocene (Hilgen et al., 2000a; Hilgen et al., 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal Footprints from the Miocene-Pliocene Ogallala
    Mammalfootprints from the Miocene-Pliocene Ogallala Formation, easternNew Mexico by ThomasE. Williamsonand SpencerG. Lucas, New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science,1801 Mountain Road NW Albuquerque, New Mexico 87104-7375 Abstract well-develooed mudcracks. The track- ways are diveloped on the mudstone Mammal trackways preserved in the drape but are preserved as infillings at the Miocene-Pliocene Ogallala Formation of base of the overlying conglomerate (Figs. eastern New Mexico represent the first 2-4). Most tracks are preserved on the report of mammal fossils-from this unit in underside of a single, thick conglomerate New Mexico. These trackwavs are Dre- block (Fig. 3). A few isolated mammal served as infillings in a conglomerate near the base of the Ogallala Formation. At least prints were also observed on the under- four mammalian ichnotaxa are represented, side of adjacent blocks.he depth of the including a single trackway of a large camel infillings suggest that tracks were made in (Gambapessp. A), several prints of an uncer- a relatively soft substrate. Some prints are tain family of artiodactyl (Gambapessp B), a accompanied by marks indicating slip- single trackway of a large feloid carnivoran page on a slick, wet substrate (Fig. 5C). (Bestiopeda sp.), and several indistinct im- Infillings of mudcracks and narrow, cylin- pressions, probably representing more than drical burrows and raindrop impressions one trackway of a small canid carnivoran are Dreserved over some areas of the (Chelipus sp ). The footprints are preserved in a channel-margin facies of an Ogallala tracliway slab. Mammal trackways repre- braided stream. sent at least four ichnotaxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Neogene Stratigraphy of the Langenboom Locality (Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands)
    Netherlands Journal of Geosciences — Geologie en Mijnbouw | 87 - 2 | 165 - 180 | 2008 Neogene stratigraphy of the Langenboom locality (Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands) E. Wijnker1'*, T.J. Bor2, F.P. Wesselingh3, D.K. Munsterman4, H. Brinkhiris5, A.W. Burger6, H.B. Vonhof7, K. Post8, K. Hoedemakers9, A.C. Janse10 & N. Taverne11 1 Laboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University, Arboretumlaan 4, 6703 BD Wageningen, the Netherlands. 2 Prinsenweer 54, 3363 JK Sliedrecht, the Netherlands. 3 Naturalis, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands. 4 TN0 B&0 - National Geological Survey, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands. 5 Palaeocecology, Inst. Environmental Biology, Laboratory of Palaeobotany and Palynology, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 4, 3584 CD Utrecht, the Netherlands. 6 P. Soutmanlaan 18, 1701 MC Heerhugowaard, the Netherlands. 7 Faculty Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, de Boelelaan 1085, 1081 EH Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 8 Natuurmuseum Rotterdam, P.O. Box 23452, 3001 KL Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 9 Minervastraat 23, B 2640 Mortsel, Belgium. 10 Gerard van Voornestraat 165, 3232 BE Brielle, the Netherlands. 11 Snipweg 14, 5451 VP Mill, the Netherlands. * corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Manuscript received: February 2007; accepted: March 2008 Abstract The locality of Langenboom (eastern Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands), also known as Mill, is famous for its Neogene molluscs, shark teeth, teleost remains, birds and marine mammals. The stratigraphic context of the fossils, which have been collected from sand suppletions, was hitherto poorly understood. Here we report on a section which has been sampled by divers in the adjacent flooded sandpit 'De Kuilen' from which the Langenboom sands have been extracted.
    [Show full text]
  • International Chronostratigraphic Chart
    INTERNATIONAL CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHART www.stratigraphy.org International Commission on Stratigraphy v 2015/01 numerical numerical numerical Eonothem numerical Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Erathem / Era System / Period GSSP GSSP age (Ma) GSSP GSSA EonothemErathem / Eon System / Era / Period EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) / Eon GSSP age (Ma) present ~ 145.0 358.9 ± 0.4 ~ 541.0 ±1.0 Holocene Ediacaran 0.0117 Tithonian Upper 152.1 ±0.9 Famennian ~ 635 0.126 Upper Kimmeridgian Neo- Cryogenian Middle 157.3 ±1.0 Upper proterozoic ~ 720 Pleistocene 0.781 372.2 ±1.6 Calabrian Oxfordian Tonian 1.80 163.5 ±1.0 Frasnian 1000 Callovian 166.1 ±1.2 Quaternary Gelasian 2.58 382.7 ±1.6 Stenian Bathonian 168.3 ±1.3 Piacenzian Middle Bajocian Givetian 1200 Pliocene 3.600 170.3 ±1.4 Middle 387.7 ±0.8 Meso- Zanclean Aalenian proterozoic Ectasian 5.333 174.1 ±1.0 Eifelian 1400 Messinian Jurassic 393.3 ±1.2 7.246 Toarcian Calymmian Tortonian 182.7 ±0.7 Emsian 1600 11.63 Pliensbachian Statherian Lower 407.6 ±2.6 Serravallian 13.82 190.8 ±1.0 Lower 1800 Miocene Pragian 410.8 ±2.8 Langhian Sinemurian Proterozoic Neogene 15.97 Orosirian 199.3 ±0.3 Lochkovian Paleo- Hettangian 2050 Burdigalian 201.3 ±0.2 419.2 ±3.2 proterozoic 20.44 Mesozoic Rhaetian Pridoli Rhyacian Aquitanian 423.0 ±2.3 23.03 ~ 208.5 Ludfordian 2300 Cenozoic Chattian Ludlow 425.6 ±0.9 Siderian 28.1 Gorstian Oligocene Upper Norian 427.4 ±0.5 2500 Rupelian Wenlock Homerian
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018 March 2019 __________________________________ ANNUAL REPORT 2018 INSTITUT CATALÀ DE PALEONTOLOGIA MIQUEL CRUSAFONT DAVID M. ALBA Director © Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont 2019 Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont (ICP), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Edifici ICTA-ICP, c/ Columnes s/n, Campus de la UAB, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona. Museu de l’ICP c/ Escola Industrial 23, 08201 Sabadell, Barcelona. Patrons: Member of: __________________________________ Annual Report 2018 Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont WELCOME TO THE ICP Greetings from the Director _______________________________________________________________________ At the ICP we are convinced that Paleontology, as a discipline halfway between Biology and Geology, should make fundamental contributions not only to the history of life, but also to evolutionary theory. Therefore, the research performed at the ICP clearly follows a paleobiological approach. In other words, for us it is not enough to know how past living beings were and what are their kinship relationships with extant ones. We also aim to know how they lived, how they moved, what they ate, how they developed and reproduced, how they interacted with one another, what environment they inhabited and, ultimately, how past interactions between organisms and environment have shaped the ecosystems that we know today. It is precisely the access to deep time (or geological time, the one which is measured in millions and millions of years), by means of the study of fossil remains, what provides Paleobiology with a unique perspective of utmost importance for understanding why and how living beings have evolved in relation to the environment than surrounds them through Earth’s history.
    [Show full text]
  • New Dinoflagellate Cyst and Acritarch Taxa from the Pliocene and Pleistocene of the Eastern North Atlantic (DSDP Site 610)
    Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 6 (1): 101–117 Issued 22 February 2008 doi:10.1017/S1477201907002167 Printed in the United Kingdom C The Natural History Museum New dinoflagellate cyst and acritarch taxa from the Pliocene and Pleistocene of the eastern North Atlantic (DSDP Site 610) Stijn De Schepper∗ Cambridge Quaternary, Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge CB2 3EN, United Kingdom Martin J. Head† Department of Earth Sciences, Brock University, 500 Glenridge Avenue, St. Catharines, Ontario L2S 3A1, Canada SYNOPSIS A palynological study of Pliocene and Pleistocene deposits from DSDP Hole 610A in the eastern North Atlantic has revealed the presence of several new organic-walled dinoflagellate cyst taxa. Impagidinium cantabrigiense sp. nov. first appeared in the latest Pliocene, within an inter- val characterised by a paucity of new dinoflagellate cyst species. Operculodinium? eirikianum var. crebrum var. nov. is mostly restricted to a narrow interval near the Mammoth Subchron within the Plio- cene (Piacenzian Stage) and may be a morphological adaptation to the changing climate at that time. An unusual morphotype of Melitasphaeridium choanophorum (Deflandre & Cookson, 1955) Harland & Hill, 1979 characterised by a perforated cyst wall is also documented. In addition, the stratigraphic utility of small acritarchs in the late Cenozoic of the northern North Atlantic region is emphasised and three stratigraphically restricted acritarchs Cymatiosphaera latisepta sp. nov., Lavradosphaera crista gen. et sp. nov.
    [Show full text]