DOCSLIB.ORG

Of the Serravallian Stage (Middle Miocene)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Of the Serravallian Stage (Middle Miocene) 152 152 Articles by F.J. Hilgen1, H.A. Abels1, S. Iaccarino2, W. Krijgsman3, I. Raffi4, R. Sprovieri5, E. Turco2 and W.J. Zachariasse1 The Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) of the Serravallian Stage (Middle Miocene) 1Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected] 2Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Parma, Parma, Italy. 3Paleomagnetic Laboratory “Fort Hoofddijk”, Budapestlaan 17, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands. 4Dipartimento di Geotecnologie per l’Ambiente e il Territorio, Università “G. d’Annunzio”, Chieti, Italy. 5Dipartimento di Geologia e Gedesia della Terra, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy. The Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for point in a continuous marine section facilitates communication among the Base of the Serravallian Stage (Middle Miocene) is Earth Scientists as it permits to export the boundary as a timeline away from the GSSP, using multiple stratigraphic tools. defined in the Ras il Pellegrin section located in the During the last decade, much progress has been made in the coastal cliffs along the Fomm Ir-Rih Bay on the west Neogene by defining GSSPs of the Zanclean (Van Couvering et al., coast of Malta (35°54'50"N, 14°20'10"E). The GSSP is 2000), Piacenzian (Castradori et al., 1998) and Gelasian (Rio et al., at the base of the Blue Clay Formation (i.e., top of the 1998) Stages of the Pliocene, and the Messininan and Tortonian Stages transitional bed of the uppermost Globigerina of the (Upper) Miocene (Hilgen et al., 2000a; Hilgen et al., 2005). The next logical step is to select and propose the GSSP for the next Limestone). This boundary between the Langhian and older stage in the Miocene, the Serravallian (Pareto, 1865). Serravallian stages coincides with the end of the major Unfortunately the historical stratotype section of the Serravallian Mi-3b global cooling step in the oxygen isotopes and consists of shallow-marine sediments (Vervloet, 1966) that are reflects a major increase in Antarctic ice volume, marking unsuitable for defining the GSSP. However the definition of the GSSP is greatly facilitated by the progress made in establishing an orbitally- the end of the Middle Miocene climate transition and tuned and integrated stratigraphic framework for the Middle-Upper the Earth’s transformation into an “Icehouse” climate Miocene both in the Mediterranean (Hilgen et al., 2000b, 2003; state. The associated major glacio-eustatic sea-level Caruso et al., 2002; Lirer et al., 2002; Sprovieri M. et al., 2002; Abels drop corresponds with sequence boundary Ser1 of et al., 2005) as well as in the open ocean (Shackleton and Crowhurst, Hardenbol et al. (1998) and supposedly with the TB2.5 1997; Westerhold et al., 2005; Holbourn et al., 2005; 2007). Formal definition of Middle Miocene global chronostratigraphic sequence boundary of Haq et al (1987). This event is units via their GSSPs is also timely in view of the current interest in slightly older than the last common and/or continuous major climate transitions and perturbations that occurred along the occurrence of the calcareous nannofossil Sphenolithus Cenozoic climatic deterioration from the Eocene “Greenhouse World” heteromorphus, previously considered as guiding into the present “Icehouse World”. In fact, one of the major changes in the climate system is termed the Middle Miocene climate transition criterion for the boundary, and is projected to fall within that started from the Miocene climatic optimum around 16 to 15 Ma. the younger half of Chron C5ACn. The GSSP level is in The end of the transition is marked by the major Mi-3b isotope shift full agreement with the definitions of the Langhian and reflecting a significant increase in Antarctic ice volume and the final Serravallian in their respective historical stratotype transition into the “Icehouse World” (Fig.1). In fact it is this isotope sections in northern Italy and has an astronomical age shift, or more accurately the end of this shift, that is taken as prime guiding criterion for the Serravallian GSSP rather than one of the of 13.82 Ma. more conventional biostratigraphic criteria that proved to be slightly diachronous between the Mediterranean and open ocean. Introduction and Motivation The Ras il Pellegrin section located along the west coast of Malta was selected as the best section for defining the Serravallian GSSP The aim of this paper is to announce the formal ratification of because it covers the critical time interval in a continuous deep marine the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) of the Serravallian succession suitable for integrated stratigraphic studies. In 2006, a Stage which, together with the preceding Langhian, constitutes the formal proposal for defining the boundary (Hilgen et al., 2006) was twofold subdivision of the Middle Miocene Subseries in the Global unanimously accepted (86% quorum, all 18 votes positive, one with Standard Global Chronostratigraphic scale. Boundaries between reservations) by the voting members of the Subcommission on global stages, the basic chronostratigraphic units, are defined by a Neogene Stratigraphy (SNS). Official acceptance of the revised GSSP for the younger stage. Their formal definition at a well defined proposal by the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS) September 2009 153 Chronostrat. Geomagnetic Reconstructed sea level Biostratigraphy Isotope-stratigraphy less deep and less far from the coast. Polarity Planktonic Calc. ODP 1146 It is at the beginning of the d h e 13 c oire foraminifera nannopl. Benthic foraminiferal δ C g Coastal onlap o atS 0 0.8 1.6 alternations of greyish sandy marls p N Zone M Zone NN Zones P E ATNTS04 Sequences segmented and yellow sands that I place the 012 Benthic foraminiferal δ18 O n lower limit of the third subdivision ain of the Miocene terrains, which is that otroT of the Upper Miocene and which I C5 name the Serravallian stage, after the village of Serravalle, where the stage is well developed and forms a n aillavarre range of high hills that extend to the west and east of the village and which represent a special geological S ” aspect and composition”. T e e C GSSP n Note that Pareto (1865) consi- n CM6 M E3 / Mi-3b e ec M g dered the Serravallian as the third “ oi o e (upper) Miocene stage following the M N n aih – now obsolete – Bormidian and the g Langhian defined by him at the n ” aL O same time. He placed the Tortonian C M already in the Pliocene below the M “ upper Pliocene Piacenzian (see Fig.1a in Hilgen et al., 2005). n aila After its introduction, the Serravallian was soon abandoned in gidru favour of the Helvetian introduced B earlier by Mayer-Eymar (1858; see Fig.1a in Hilgen et al., 2005). But the term Serravallian was revived Figure 1. Summary of the Geologic Time Scale 2004 (GTS04) from 18 to 10 Ma, showing the geomagnetic polarity time scale of the ATNTS2004 (Lourens et al., 2004), the reconstructed sea level after it was realized that the type Helvetian was time-equivalent with and segmented coastal onlap (after Hardenbol et al., 1998), the planktonic foraminiferal N and M zones (Blow, 1969 and Berggren et al., 1995),, the calcareous nannofossil NN zones (after Raffi et the Burdigalian (Regional Commi- ttee on Mediterranean Neogene al., 2006), and the benthic oxygen and carbon isotope records of ODP Site 1146 (after Holbourn et al., 2005; 2007). Biostratigraphic ages are from the Mediterranean if available, other ages are from Stratigraphy (RCMNS) congress, Vienna, 1959). A proposal was ODP Sites 925 and 926. Figure modified from a chart produced with the Time Scale Creator program, available at: http://stratigraphy.org/column.php?id=Time%20Scale%20Creator. Serravallian GSSP presented – and accepted – at the RCMNS congress in Bratislava is indicated by an arrow to the left. (1975) to incorporate the Serravallian (15 votes or 88% positive, one abstain and one negative) and in the Standard Chronostratigraphic Scale as the second upper sub- ratification by the Executive Committee of the International Union division of the Middle Miocene, above the Langhian and below the of Geological Sciences (IUGS) were obtained later in 2006 and in Tortonian (see Fig.1b in Hilgen et al., 2005). The Serravallian has 2007, respectively. been consistently used as a global stage in all published standard geological time scales afterwards (e.g., Harland et al., 1989; Berggren Serravallian Stage: a brief historical review et al., 1995; Gradstein et al., 2004; Lourens et al., 2004) (see Fig. 1c in Hilgen et al., 2005). Nevertheless, the term was rarely used outside In this section we start with a brief outline of the original definition the Mediterranean probably as a consequence of different of the Serravallian Stage by Pareto in 1865, followed by a short interpretations proposed for the position of the Langhian-Serravallian description of the Serravallian historical stratotype of Vervloet (1966) boundary relative to the Geomagnetic Polarity Time Scale (GPTS) and the position of the base of the Serravallian and top Langhian in (Rio et al., 1997). However, since 1997, there was general consensus their respective stratotypes. to use the Sphenolithus heteromorphus Last Occurrence (LO) as primary guiding criterion for defining the boundary (Rio et al., 1997). Original definition of the Serravallian (Pareto, 1865) Serravallian stratotype section (Vervloet, 1966) The Serravallian Stage, named after the village of Serravalle Scrivia in northern Italy, was introduced by Pareto in 1865 (in english After the revival of the Serravallian, a stratotype section was translation): designated by Vervloet in the Scrivia valley near the village of “Towards the upper part of the Langhian stage you can see the Serravalle Scrivia in agreement with the type section of his Serravalle beginning of an alternation of greyish marls with beds of yellowish Sandstone Formation (Vervloet, 1966; see also Boni and Selli, 1971).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cambrian Phytoplankton of the Brunovistulicum – Taxonomy and Biostratigraphy
    MONIKA JACHOWICZ-ZDANOWSKA Cambrian phytoplankton of the Brunovistulicum – taxonomy and biostratigraphy Polish Geological Institute Special Papers,28 WARSZAWA 2013 CONTENTS Introduction...........................................................6 Geological setting and lithostratigraphy.............................................8 Summary of Cambrian chronostratigraphy and acritarch biostratigraphy ...........................13 Review of previous palynological studies ...........................................17 Applied techniques and material studied............................................18 Biostratigraphy ........................................................23 BAMA I – Pulvinosphaeridium antiquum–Pseudotasmanites Assemblage Zone ....................25 BAMA II – Asteridium tornatum–Comasphaeridium velvetum Assemblage Zone ...................27 BAMA III – Ichnosphaera flexuosa–Comasphaeridium molliculum Assemblage Zone – Acme Zone .........30 BAMA IV – Skiagia–Eklundia campanula Assemblage Zone ..............................39 BAMA V – Skiagia–Eklundia varia Assemblage Zone .................................39 BAMA VI – Volkovia dentifera–Liepaina plana Assemblage Zone (Moczyd³owska, 1991) ..............40 BAMA VII – Ammonidium bellulum–Ammonidium notatum Assemblage Zone ....................40 BAMA VIII – Turrisphaeridium semireticulatum Assemblage Zone – Acme Zone...................41 BAMA IX – Adara alea–Multiplicisphaeridium llynense Assemblage Zone – Acme Zone...............42 Regional significance of the biostratigraphic
    [Show full text]
  • Neogene Stratigraphy of the Langenboom Locality (Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands)
    Netherlands Journal of Geosciences — Geologie en Mijnbouw | 87 - 2 | 165 - 180 | 2008 Neogene stratigraphy of the Langenboom locality (Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands) E. Wijnker1'*, T.J. Bor2, F.P. Wesselingh3, D.K. Munsterman4, H. Brinkhiris5, A.W. Burger6, H.B. Vonhof7, K. Post8, K. Hoedemakers9, A.C. Janse10 & N. Taverne11 1 Laboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University, Arboretumlaan 4, 6703 BD Wageningen, the Netherlands. 2 Prinsenweer 54, 3363 JK Sliedrecht, the Netherlands. 3 Naturalis, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands. 4 TN0 B&0 - National Geological Survey, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands. 5 Palaeocecology, Inst. Environmental Biology, Laboratory of Palaeobotany and Palynology, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 4, 3584 CD Utrecht, the Netherlands. 6 P. Soutmanlaan 18, 1701 MC Heerhugowaard, the Netherlands. 7 Faculty Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, de Boelelaan 1085, 1081 EH Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 8 Natuurmuseum Rotterdam, P.O. Box 23452, 3001 KL Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 9 Minervastraat 23, B 2640 Mortsel, Belgium. 10 Gerard van Voornestraat 165, 3232 BE Brielle, the Netherlands. 11 Snipweg 14, 5451 VP Mill, the Netherlands. * corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Manuscript received: February 2007; accepted: March 2008 Abstract The locality of Langenboom (eastern Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands), also known as Mill, is famous for its Neogene molluscs, shark teeth, teleost remains, birds and marine mammals. The stratigraphic context of the fossils, which have been collected from sand suppletions, was hitherto poorly understood. Here we report on a section which has been sampled by divers in the adjacent flooded sandpit 'De Kuilen' from which the Langenboom sands have been extracted.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018 March 2019 __________________________________ ANNUAL REPORT 2018 INSTITUT CATALÀ DE PALEONTOLOGIA MIQUEL CRUSAFONT DAVID M. ALBA Director © Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont 2019 Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont (ICP), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Edifici ICTA-ICP, c/ Columnes s/n, Campus de la UAB, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona. Museu de l’ICP c/ Escola Industrial 23, 08201 Sabadell, Barcelona. Patrons: Member of: __________________________________ Annual Report 2018 Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont WELCOME TO THE ICP Greetings from the Director _______________________________________________________________________ At the ICP we are convinced that Paleontology, as a discipline halfway between Biology and Geology, should make fundamental contributions not only to the history of life, but also to evolutionary theory. Therefore, the research performed at the ICP clearly follows a paleobiological approach. In other words, for us it is not enough to know how past living beings were and what are their kinship relationships with extant ones. We also aim to know how they lived, how they moved, what they ate, how they developed and reproduced, how they interacted with one another, what environment they inhabited and, ultimately, how past interactions between organisms and environment have shaped the ecosystems that we know today. It is precisely the access to deep time (or geological time, the one which is measured in millions and millions of years), by means of the study of fossil remains, what provides Paleobiology with a unique perspective of utmost importance for understanding why and how living beings have evolved in relation to the environment than surrounds them through Earth’s history.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Neogene Chronology: New Perspectives in High-Resolution Stratigraphy
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Columbia University Academic Commons Late Neogene chronology: New perspectives in high-resolution stratigraphy W. A. Berggren Department of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543 F. J. Hilgen Institute of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 4, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands C. G. Langereis } D. V. Kent Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964 J. D. Obradovich Isotope Geology Branch, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225 Isabella Raffi Facolta di Scienze MM.FF.NN, Universita ‘‘G. D’Annunzio’’, ‘‘Chieti’’, Italy M. E. Raymo Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 N. J. Shackleton Godwin Laboratory of Quaternary Research, Free School Lane, Cambridge University, Cambridge CB2 3RS, United Kingdom ABSTRACT (Calabria, Italy), is located near the top of working group with the task of investigat- the Olduvai (C2n) Magnetic Polarity Sub- ing and resolving the age disagreements in We present an integrated geochronology chronozone with an estimated age of 1.81 the then-nascent late Neogene chronologic for late Neogene time (Pliocene, Pleisto- Ma. The 13 calcareous nannoplankton schemes being developed by means of as- cene, and Holocene Epochs) based on an and 48 planktonic foraminiferal datum tronomical/climatic proxies (Hilgen, 1987; analysis of data from stable isotopes, mag- events for the Pliocene, and 12 calcareous Hilgen and Langereis, 1988, 1989; Shackle- netostratigraphy, radiochronology, and cal- nannoplankton and 10 planktonic foram- ton et al., 1990) and the classical radiometric careous plankton biostratigraphy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neogene/Quaternary Boundary in India: a Review
    Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth Planet. Sci.), Vol. 90. Number 2, July 1981, pp. 111-123. @ Printed in India. The Neogene/Quaternary boundary in India: A review D P AGRAWAL, D K BHATT*, SHEELA KUSUMGAR and R K PANT Physical Research laboratory, Ahmedabad 380 009, India *Geological Survey of India, Lucknow 226 007. India MS received 5 January 1981; revised 30 April 1981 Abstract. The Neogene/Quaternary boundary has been variously defined in different continents. A global review of the problem shows that only the Old- uvai event on the palaeomagnetic timescale may provide an universally accept- able isochronous datum for delineating this boundary. The N/Q boundary in the Siwaliks, Kashmir and the Andamans in India is defined in the light of recent research. Keywor~. Neogene/Quaternary boundary ; palaeomagnetic data. 1. Introduction Lyel] coined the term 'Pleistocene' in 1839 as a substitute for the term newer Pliocene (Lyell 1833) and included the sediments which contained 90-95~ molluscan species still living. During the Pleistocene many of the living mammals made their first appearance. The onset of the first glacia- tion was also used as a marker to define the boundary between Pliocene and Pleistocene by geologists working on continental sections. Recent literature, however, prefers to use the term Neogene/Quaternary boundary in place of the Pliocene/Pleistocene boundary. The Russian workers, however, use Neogene/Anthropogene and interpolate an 'Eopleistocene' stage between the Pliocene and Pleistocene (Gerasimov 1979); this stage marks the first appearance of hominid forms. We will, for the present, use the term Neogene/Quaternary (N/Q) boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraining Neogene Temperature and Precipitation Histories in The
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations & Theses in Earth and Atmospheric Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department of Sciences Spring 4-21-2016 Constraining Neogene temperature and precipitation histories in the Central Great Plains using the fossil record of Alligator Evan Whiting University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geoscidiss Part of the Climate Commons, Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Paleobiology Commons, and the Paleontology Commons Whiting, Evan, "Constraining Neogene temperature and precipitation histories in the Central Great Plains using the fossil record of Alligator" (2016). Dissertations & Theses in Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. 79. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geoscidiss/79 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations & Theses in Earth and Atmospheric Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. CONSTRAINING NEOGENE TEMPERATURE AND PRECIPITATION HISTORIES IN THE CENTRAL GREAT PLAINS USING THE FOSSIL RECORD OF ALLIGATOR by Evan T. Whiting A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Major: Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Under the Supervision of Professor Sherilyn C. Fritz Lincoln, Nebraska April, 2016 i CONSTRAINING NEOGENE TEMPERATURE AND PRECIPITATION HISTORIES IN THE CENTRAL GREAT PLAINS USING THE FOSSIL RECORD OF ALLIGATOR Evan Tyler Whiting, M.S. University of Nebraska, 2016 Advisor: Sherilyn C. Fritz Most amphibians and reptiles (excluding birds) are poikilothermic; their internal body temperature varies with that of their external environment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Middle Eocene Lowland Humid Subtropical “Shangri-La” Ecosystem in Central Tibet
    A Middle Eocene lowland humid subtropical “Shangri-La” ecosystem in central Tibet Tao Sua,b,c,1, Robert A. Spicera,d, Fei-Xiang Wue,f, Alexander Farnsworthg, Jian Huanga,b, Cédric Del Rioa, Tao Dengc,e,f, Lin Dingh,i, Wei-Yu-Dong Denga,c, Yong-Jiang Huangj, Alice Hughesk, Lin-Bo Jiaj, Jian-Hua Jinl, Shu-Feng Lia,b, Shui-Qing Liangm, Jia Liua,b, Xiao-Yan Liun, Sarah Sherlockd, Teresa Spicera, Gaurav Srivastavao, He Tanga,c, Paul Valdesg, Teng-Xiang Wanga,c, Mike Widdowsonp, Meng-Xiao Wua,c, Yao-Wu Xinga,b, Cong-Li Xua, Jian Yangq, Cong Zhangr, Shi-Tao Zhangs, Xin-Wen Zhanga,c, Fan Zhaoa, and Zhe-Kun Zhoua,b,j,1 aCAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla 666303, China; bCenter of Plant Ecology, Core Botanical Gardens, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla 666303, China; cUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049 Beijing, China; dSchool of Environment, Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, United Kingdom; eKey Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100044 Beijing, China; fCenter for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101 Beijing, China; gSchool of Geographical Sciences and Cabot Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TH, United Kingdom; hCAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101 Beijing, China; iKey Laboratory of
    [Show full text]
  • Faunal Characterisation of Neogene and Pleistocene Localities of the State Jalisco, Mexico
    ©Staatl. Mus. f. Naturkde Karlsruhe & Naturwiss. Ver. Karlsruhe e.V.; download unter www.zobodat.at carolinea, 62 (2004): 63-68, 2 Abb., 1. Taf.; Karlsruhe, 15.12.2004 63 H. D ieter Schreiber Faunal characterisation of Neogene and Pleistocene localities of the State Jalisco, Mexico Abstract The collection at the MPG (see fig. 1) contains fossil The collection of the Museo de Paleontología de Guadalajara, remains of vertebrates (Mammalia, Aves, Reptilia, Jalisco, Mexico (MPG) contains fossils of vertebrates from Amphibia, Pisces) and plant remains (e.g. siliceous several localities in the State Jalisco, SW-Mexico. The locali­ ties are Miocene up to Pleistocene in age. Based on investiga­ wood) from Miocene up to late Pleistocene localities. tions during a visit at the MPG in 2003 a faunal list and a short Unfortunately, precise coordinates of the localities or characterisation of the faunal assemblage are presented in strata of most fossils are unknown. Whereas coordi­ comparison to the localities Rancho la Brea (California, USA) nates and stratum are reported for a skeleton of a re­ and Mina (Nuevo León, NE-Mexico). Potential projects for fur­ cently excavated gomphotherid, the lack of precise de­ ther investigations on the fossil material and the localities are proposed. tails on the fossil sites and in consequence their ages is a result of the historic origin of the collection. Kurzfassung Faunistische Charakterisierung von Neogenen und Plei- stozänen Fundstellen des Staates Jalisco, Mexiko Die Sammlung des Museo de Paleontología de Guadalajara, Origin of the collection Jalisco, Mexico (MPG) umfasst Wirbeltierfossilien aus mehre­ ren Fundstellen im Bundesstaat Jalisco, SW-Mexiko.
    [Show full text]
  • International Chronostratigraphic Chart
    INTERNATIONAL CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHART www.stratigraphy.org International Commission on Stratigraphy v 2014/02 numerical numerical numerical Eonothem numerical Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Erathem / Era System / Period GSSP GSSP age (Ma) GSSP GSSA EonothemErathem / Eon System / Era / Period EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) / Eon GSSP age (Ma) present ~ 145.0 358.9 ± 0.4 ~ 541.0 ±1.0 Holocene Ediacaran 0.0117 Tithonian Upper 152.1 ±0.9 Famennian ~ 635 0.126 Upper Kimmeridgian Neo- Cryogenian Middle 157.3 ±1.0 Upper proterozoic Pleistocene 0.781 372.2 ±1.6 850 Calabrian Oxfordian Tonian 1.80 163.5 ±1.0 Frasnian 1000 Callovian 166.1 ±1.2 Quaternary Gelasian 2.58 382.7 ±1.6 Stenian Bathonian 168.3 ±1.3 Piacenzian Middle Bajocian Givetian 1200 Pliocene 3.600 170.3 ±1.4 Middle 387.7 ±0.8 Meso- Zanclean Aalenian proterozoic Ectasian 5.333 174.1 ±1.0 Eifelian 1400 Messinian Jurassic 393.3 ±1.2 7.246 Toarcian Calymmian Tortonian 182.7 ±0.7 Emsian 1600 11.62 Pliensbachian Statherian Lower 407.6 ±2.6 Serravallian 13.82 190.8 ±1.0 Lower 1800 Miocene Pragian 410.8 ±2.8 Langhian Sinemurian Proterozoic Neogene 15.97 Orosirian 199.3 ±0.3 Lochkovian Paleo- Hettangian 2050 Burdigalian 201.3 ±0.2 419.2 ±3.2 proterozoic 20.44 Mesozoic Rhaetian Pridoli Rhyacian Aquitanian 423.0 ±2.3 23.03 ~ 208.5 Ludfordian 2300 Cenozoic Chattian Ludlow 425.6 ±0.9 Siderian 28.1 Gorstian Oligocene Upper Norian 427.4 ±0.5 2500 Rupelian Wenlock Homerian
    [Show full text]
  • Paleogeographic Maps Earth History
    History of the Earth Age AGE Eon Era Period Period Epoch Stage Paleogeographic Maps Earth History (Ma) Era (Ma) Holocene Neogene Quaternary* Pleistocene Calabrian/Gelasian Piacenzian 2.6 Cenozoic Pliocene Zanclean Paleogene Messinian 5.3 L Tortonian 100 Cretaceous Serravallian Miocene M Langhian E Burdigalian Jurassic Neogene Aquitanian 200 23 L Chattian Triassic Oligocene E Rupelian Permian 34 Early Neogene 300 L Priabonian Bartonian Carboniferous Cenozoic M Eocene Lutetian 400 Phanerozoic Devonian E Ypresian Silurian Paleogene L Thanetian 56 PaleozoicOrdovician Mesozoic Paleocene M Selandian 500 E Danian Cambrian 66 Maastrichtian Ediacaran 600 Campanian Late Santonian 700 Coniacian Turonian Cenomanian Late Cretaceous 100 800 Cryogenian Albian 900 Neoproterozoic Tonian Cretaceous Aptian Early 1000 Barremian Hauterivian Valanginian 1100 Stenian Berriasian 146 Tithonian Early Cretaceous 1200 Late Kimmeridgian Oxfordian 161 Callovian Mesozoic 1300 Ectasian Bathonian Middle Bajocian Aalenian 176 1400 Toarcian Jurassic Mesoproterozoic Early Pliensbachian 1500 Sinemurian Hettangian Calymmian 200 Rhaetian 1600 Proterozoic Norian Late 1700 Statherian Carnian 228 1800 Ladinian Late Triassic Triassic Middle Anisian 1900 245 Olenekian Orosirian Early Induan Changhsingian 251 2000 Lopingian Wuchiapingian 260 Capitanian Guadalupian Wordian/Roadian 2100 271 Kungurian Paleoproterozoic Rhyacian Artinskian 2200 Permian Cisuralian Sakmarian Middle Permian 2300 Asselian 299 Late Gzhelian Kasimovian 2400 Siderian Middle Moscovian Penn- sylvanian Early Bashkirian
    [Show full text]
  • The Neogene: Origin, Adoption, Evolution, and Controversy
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Earth-Science Reviews 89 (2008) 42–72 www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev The Neogene: Origin, adoption, evolution, and controversy Stephen L. Walsh 1 Department of Paleontology, San Diego Natural History Museum, PO Box 121390, San Diego, CA 92112, USA Received 4 October 2007; accepted 3 December 2007 Available online 14 December 2007 Abstract Some stratigraphers have recently insisted that for historical reasons, the Neogene (Miocene+Pliocene) should be extended to the present. However, despite some ambiguity in its application by Moriz Hörnes in the 1850s, the “Neogene” was widely adopted by European geologists to refer to the Miocene and Pliocene of Lyell, but excluding the “Diluvium” (later to become the Pleistocene) and “Alluvium” (later to become the Holocene). During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the ends of the Neogene, Tertiary and Pliocene evolved in response to the progressive lowering of the beginnings of the Quaternary and Pleistocene.
    [Show full text]
  • Neogene Life & Extinctions (Pdf)
    Neogene Worlds, Life & Extinctions Norman MacLeod School of Earth Sciences & Engineering, Nanjing University Neogene Worlds, Life & Extinctions Objectives Understand the structure of the Neogene world in terms of timescales, geo- graphy, environments, and organisms. Understand the structure of Neogene extinction events. Understand the major Neogene extinction drivers. Understand the degree to which these putative drivers correlate with Neogene extinction events. Neogene Worlds, Life & Extinctions Presentation Topics Stratigraphy - chronostrati- graphy & geochronology Geography - tectonics & distribution Climate - circulation, temp- 0°0° erature, weather Biota - protists, inverte- brates, vertebrates, plants Evolution - evolutionary faunas, adaptive radiations, major innovations Significant Events - sea-level changes, volcanic eruptions, marine anoxia events, bolide impacts, extinctions 80 PhanerozoicPhanerozoic System Durations 64 48 Duration32 (myr) 16 0 Camb. Ord. Sil. Dev. Carbon. Perm. Trias. Jur. Cret. Paleog. Neog. Data fromQuat. ICS (2020) Cenozoic Epoch Durations 24 19.2 14.4 9.6 Duration (myr) 4.8 0 Paleocene Eocene Oligocene Miocene Pliocene Data from ICS (2020) Neogene Neogene Timescale System/ Numerical Period Series/Epoch Stage/Age Age (Ma) 2.580 Piacenzian Pliocene 3.600 Zanclean 5.333 Messinian 7.246 Tortonian 11.63 Serravillian Miocene 13.82 Neogene Langhian 15.97 Burdigalian 20.44 Aquitainian 23.03 ICS International Chronostrat. Chart 2020/03 Neogene Tectonic Configuration Establishment of modern tectonic plate configurations and establishment of modern atmospheric and marine circulation patterns. Continents continue to drift toward their present positions. Land bridge between North America and South America forms during the Pliocene due to sea-level fall. Mountain ranges appear on almost all continents owing to tectonic collisions & subductions. Tectonic collision between Africa and Europe caused Mediterranean Sea to dry up in Messinian.
    [Show full text]