Updates from the International and Internationalized Criminal Courts Shaleen Brunsdale American University Washington College of Law

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Updates from the International and Internationalized Criminal Courts Shaleen Brunsdale American University Washington College of Law Human Rights Brief Volume 16 | Issue 2 Article 7 2009 Updates from the International and Internationalized Criminal Courts Shaleen Brunsdale American University Washington College of Law Kara Karlson American University Washington College of Law Jennifer Goldsmith American University Washington College of Law Laura Jarvis American University Washington College of Law Megan Chapman American University Washington College of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/hrbrief Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Brunsdale, Shaleen, Kara Karlson, Jennifer Goldsmith, Laura Jarvis, and Megan Chapman." Updates from the International and Internationalized Criminal Courts." Human Rights Brief 16, no.2 (2009): 40-44. This Column is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Human Rights Brief by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Brunsdale et al.: Updates from the International and Internationalized Criminal Cou UPDATES FROM INTERNATIONAL AND INTERNATIONALIZED CRIMINAL COURTS & TRIBUNALS INTERNATIONA L CRI M INA L commander Radislav Krstic´. He related them victimized only because of their TRIBUNA L FOR THE his experience of being captured by the ethnicity. This ICTY initiative will serve FOR M ER YUGOS L AVIA Bosnian Serb army, the Vojska Repub- as a useful tool for understanding and lika Srpska (VRS), while he was hiding appreciating the atrocities which occurred A New Face in a forest during an attempted escape in the former Yugoslavia and support the from Srebrenica. He had been seized efforts by the international community to In December 2008, the International and lined up in a meadow along with secure justice for the people who were Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugo- dozens of men. The men were shot and most affected. slavia (ICTY) launched a new website killed, but the boy managed to survive, giving itself a fresh, new face. The new escape, and tell his story. The Tribunal Future of the Tribunal layout, design and innovative additional convicted Radislav Krstic´ and sentenced content helps the ICTY achieve judicial him to 35 years’ imprisonment. Another The ICTY is working towards the com- transparency and accountability and pro- victim, Grozdana Ce´ ´cez, a 43-year-old pletion of its mandate and has devised a vides insight into challenges and achieve- Bosnian Serb woman, testified in the case plan to complete its mission successfully, ments. The new website pays tribute to against Zdravko Mucic´, Hazim Delic´, in a timely manner, and in coordination the contributions the Tribunal has made Esad Landžo, and Zejnil Delalic´, com- with domestic legal systems in the for- to international humanitarian law and manders and deputy commanders in the mer Yugoslavia. The Tribunal’s current human rights issues. The Tribunal hopes C ˇelebic ´ i prison camp. She had been raped goal is to complete all proceedings by to use the website to educate the interna- by Hazim Delic´ and multiple other men in 2012. Of the 161 Accused indicted by tional community about the massacre at the camp. After the experience, she said the Tribunal, only five Accused remain Srebrenica, rapes committed by members that she was driven to commit suicide in the pretrial stage, twenty-six are in the of the Bosnian Serb armed forces, and the but was stopped by another detainee who course of trial and ten have appeals pend- persecution that occurred in the Omarska, had also been raped. The case of Hazim ing. With the arrest of Stojan Župljanin Keraterm and Trnopolje camps, amongst Delic´, who was sentenced to 18 years’ and Radovan Karadžic´ on June 11, 2008 other horrendous events which will now imprisonment, was a landmark case in and July 18, 2008 respectively, only two become part of an undeniable historical international law marking the first time accused, Ratko Mladic´ and Goran Hadžic´, record. The ICTY plans to use this new the court found rape as a form of torture. are still at large. All the other cases have and improved forum to spread the ideals been completed. of international justice not only by shar- Another witness, a Bosnian army pris- ing updates on the convictions and trials oner of war testified about being tortured The ICTY has bolstered its completion of some of the most notorious criminals, in the Široki Brijeg prison near Mostar, strategy by focusing on the most senior but also by sharing the tragic stories and in southern Bosnia and Herzegovina. He leaders suspected of crimes within its the courageous voices of hundreds of was repeatedly beaten and bloodied with jurisdiction and transferring cases against victims. boots, belts and fists. He talked about intermediate and lower-level perpetra- being interrogated while being attached to tors to competent national courts set up Voice of the Victims wires from an induction telephone pass- in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and ing electricity from his fingers to his toes. Croatia. The impact of referrals on the The ICTY created the Voice of the He recalled that for food, the prisoners overall workload of the Tribunal has been Victims section on their website to honor received a quarter loaf of bread every two significant. Ten accused have been trans- the courage and bravery of those victims or three days and no water. The Tribunal ferred to the War Crimes Section of the who testified before the Tribunal, facing convicted Mladen Naletilic´ and Vinko State Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina; the people who caused them so much Martinovic´ of a number of crimes against two were transferred to the authorities suffering. It recognizes the importance Bosnian Muslims in the Mostar area and of Croatia; and one was transferred to of giving victims a chance to tell their sentenced them to 20 and 18 years impris- Serbia for trial before the domestic courts stories to bridge the gap between the onment, respectively. of these countries. The Tribunal has con- Tribunal, situated so far away in The tinued to stay involved and monitor the Hague, and the communities who have Amongst the many stories captured progress of these trials, however, ensuring the most interest in the information about on the ICTY website run common tragic full adherence with human rights norms its work. themes of pain and suffering. Numerous and due process standards. victims’ stories of what they saw and One of the victims includes a 17-year- experienced have been featured, includ- As the ICTY enters the final years old Muslim teenager who testified in ing stories from farmers, doctors, house- of its mandate, it continues to conduct a the case against Bosnian Serb Army wives, students and children, many of wide range of outreach activities includ- 40 Published by Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law, 2009 1 Human Rights Brief, Vol. 16, Iss. 2 [2009], Art. 7 ing the facilitation of trial coverage by Republika Srpska Army, is charged with INTERNATIONA L CRI M INA L local media, direct community outreach participating in the disappearances, rape, TRIBUNA L FOR RWANDA in the former Yugoslavia by officers on and murder of civilians from the town of the ground, and capacity-building efforts Rogatica, BiH, in 1992. A few days later, The Prosecutor v. Protais with national judicial institutes dealing Tomo Jurinovic´ was taken into custody as Zigiranyirazo, Case No. with war crimes. The focus of the Tribu- well to be held for one month. Jurinovic´, a ICTR-01-73-T nal is now on the mechanisms that will member of the Croatian Defense Council, be left in place to address residual issues along with others, is accused of having On December 18, 2008, Trial Chamber after the completion of the cases on the taken a family from their home in Novo III of the International Criminal Tribunal Tribunal’s docket. Some of the key issues Selo, and transported them to another for Rwanda (ICTR) convicted Protais being addressed include the location, pub- town. In the process, the family was Zigiranyirazo for genocide and extermi- lic access, security, and preservation of abused, and one family member was killed. nation as a crime against humanity and ICTY records. The Tribunal has also sentenced him to 20 years imprisonment. compiled their best practices, which will Dragic´ Gojkovic´, Rada Gojkovic´ et. al. The Chamber found that the Prosecution be published and disseminated by the pled not guilty to the offense of illicit traf- failed to establish that Zigiranyirazo was United Nations Interregional Crime and ficking in arms, military equipment, and criminally responsible for conspiracy to Justice Research Institute (UNICRI), their products of dual use. They are charged commit genocide, complicity in genocide partner in this endeavor. with abusing their authority and duty by and murder as a crime against humanity. facilitating the illegal sailing and import- As the Tribunal’s work winds down, ing of military ships into BiH through Protais Zigiranyirazo, also known as it remains committed to ensuring that the country’s harbors and ports. Momir “Mr. Z,” was born in 1938 in the prefec- its achievements endure. The capture of Pelemiš and Slavko Peric´, suspected of ture of Gisenyi, Rwanda. He served as the the two remaining fugitives, Mladic´ and committing genocide, pled not guilty. Prefect of Ruhengeri between 1974 and Hadžic´, are of utmost importance to the They are charged with permanently and 1989. Although he subsequently became ICTY and the United Nations Security forcibly transferring Bosniak civilians a businessman, he remained influential in Council. Serge Brammertz, chief prosecu- from a UN safe area in Srebenica in order politics by virtue of the fact that his sister, tor of the ICTY, confirmed that efforts to execute Bosniak men and boys.
Recommended publications
  • ORIGINAL: ENGLISH TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Erik Møse
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Tribunal pénal international pour le Rwanda ORIGINAL: ENGLISH TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Erik Møse, presiding Judge Jai Ram Reddy Judge Sergei Alekseevich Egorov Registrar: Adama Dieng Date: 18 December 2008 THE PROSECUTOR v. Théoneste BAGOSORA Gratien KABILIGI Aloys NTABAKUZE Anatole NSENGIYUMVA Case No. ICTR-98-41-T JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE Office of the Prosecutor: Counsel for the Defence: Barbara Mulvaney Raphaël Constant Christine Graham Allison Turner Kartik Murukutla Paul Skolnik Rashid Rashid Frédéric Hivon Gregory Townsend Peter Erlinder Drew White Kennedy Ogetto Gershom Otachi Bw’Omanwa The Prosecutor v. Théoneste Bagosora et al., Case No. ICTR-98-41-T TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION........................................................................................ 1 1. Overview ................................................................................................................... 1 2. The Accused ............................................................................................................. 8 2.1 Théoneste Bagosora ................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Gratien Kabiligi ....................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Aloys Ntabakuze ...................................................................................................... 10 2.4 Anatole Nsengiyumva .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ICTR-2001-73-T the PROSECUTOR CHAMBER III of the TRIBUNAL V
    THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RWANDA CASE NO. : ICTR-2001-73-T THE PROSECUTOR CHAMBER III OF THE TRIBUNAL v. PROTAIS ZIGIRANYIRAZO MONDAY, 3 OCTOBER 2005 1502H TRIAL Before the Judges: Inés Monica Weinberg de Roca, Presiding Lee Gacuiga Muthoga Khalida Rachid Khan For the Registry: Mr. Constant K. Hometowu Mr. Sheha Mussa For the Prosecution: Mr. Hassan Bubacar Jallow Mr. Wallace Kapaya Ms. Gina Butler Mr. Iskander Ismail For the Accused Protais Zigiranyirazo: Mr. John Philpot Mr. Peter Zaduk Court Reporters: Ms. Ann Burum Ms. Sherri Knox Ms. Jean Baigent Ms. Judith Baverstock ZIGIRANYIRAZO MONDAY, 3 OCTOBER 2005 I N D E X WITNESS For the Prosecution: ZUHDI JANBEK Examination-in-chief by Mr. Kapaya .......................................................................................................... 21 EXHIBITS Exhibit No. P. 1E and P. 1F ....................................................................................................................... 25 Exhibit No. P. 2 .......................................................................................................................................... 26 ANN BURUM - ICTR - TRIAL CHAMBER III - page i ZIGIRANYIRAZO MONDAY, 3 OCTOBER 2005 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 MADAM PRESIDENT: 3 Mr. Jallow. 4 MR. JALLOW: 5 Thank you very much. If it pleases the Court, My Lords, the Accused who is -- stands before us today, 6 Protais Zigiranyirazo, is charged with conspiracy to commit genocide, with genocide or, in the 7 alternative, complicity in genocide, crimes against humanity by extermination and murder, by virtue of 8 his responsibility under Article 6(1) of the statute of the Tribunal. 9 10 Your Honours, genocide and conspiracy to commit it and complicity in it are never an act of a single 11 individual but one of several, even many, individuals. This particular article obliges us, the Prosecution, 12 to prove individual responsibility of the Accused, and this we expect to do through the witnesses whom 13 we will be presenting before the Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded License
    journal of international peacekeeping 22 (2018) 40-59 JOUP brill.com/joup Rwanda’s Forgotten Years Reconsidering the Role and Crimes of Akazu 1973–1993 Andrew Wallis University of Cambridge [email protected] Abstract The narrative on the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda has become remark- able in recent years for airbrushing the responsibility of those at its heart from the tragedy. The figure of President Juvenal Habyarimana, whose 21-year rule, along with the unofficial network based around his wife and family, the Akazu, has been largely marginalised. Yet to understand April 1994 requires a far longer-term understanding. Those responsible had grown their power, influence and ambition for decades inside every part of Rwandan society after seizing power in their coup of 1973; they had estab- lished personal and highly lucrative bonds with European and North American coun- tries, financial institutions and the Vatican, all of whom variously assisted with finan- cial, political, diplomatic and military support from 1973 into 1994. This chapter seeks to outline how Akazu built its powerbase, influence and ambition in the two decades before 1994 and the failure of its international backers to respond to repeated warning signs of a tragedy foretold. Keywords genocide – Akazu – Habyarimana – Parmehutu – Network Zero The official Independence Day celebrations that got underway on Sunday 1 July 1973 came as Rwanda teetered on the edge of an expected coup. Eleven years after independence the one party regime of President Grégoire Kayiban- da was imploding. Hit by economic and political stagnation, notably the dam- aging failure to share the trappings of power with those outside his central © Andrew Wallis, 2020 | doi:10.1163/18754112-0220104004 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0Downloaded License.
    [Show full text]
  • 1'}..13 1&3 -I"'O~ ~ International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda
    rc.,7/i- J!XJI ..:??-Z 5-'I.. ~C3 1'}..13 1&3 -I"'O~ ~ INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RWANDA Case No. ICTR·2001·73·I ~{ c.::::> THE PROSECUTOR ~ AGAINST PROTAIS ZIGIRANYIRAZO ANNOTATED AMENDED INDICTMENT The Prosecutor of the International Tribunal for Rwanda, pursuant to the authority stipulated in Article 17 of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (the "Statute of the Tribunal") charges PROTAIS ZIGIRANYIRAZO with I CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT GENOCIDE in terms of Article 2(3)(b) of the Statute of the Tribunal; II GENOCIDE, pursuant to Article 2(3)(a) of the Statute of the Tribunal; alternatively III COMPLICITY IN GENOCIDE, pursuant to Article 2(3)(e) of the Statute of the Tribunal; IV EXTERMINATION, as a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY pursuant to Article 3(a) of the Statute of the Tribunal; and V MURDER, as a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY, pursuant to Article 3(b) of the Statute of the Tribunal. THE ACCUSED 1 Protais ZIGIRANYIRAZO, alias Mr. "Z", was born in 1938 in Giciye commune, Gisenyi Prefecture, Rwanda. Giciye together with the adjoining commune of Karago constitutes Bushiro which is also the birthplace of former President of Rwanda Juvenal HABYARIMANA and his wife, Agathe KANZIGA. Protais ZIGIRANYIRAZO is Agathe KANZIGA's brother, hence the brother-in-law of President HABYARIMANA. 1 2 Protais ZIGIRANYIRAZO served the 2nd Republic MRND government of Juvenal HABYARIMANA as prefet of Ruhengeri prefecture from 1974 to 1989. During the events cited in this indictment he was a businessman in Giciye commune. THE CHARGES 3 At all times referred to in this indictment there existed in Rwanda a minority ethnic group known as Tutsis, officially identified as such by the government.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeals Judgement
    Tribunal pénal international pour le Rwanda International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda UNITED NATIONS NATIONS UNIES IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER Before: Judge Theodor Meron, Presiding Judge Mehmet Güney Judge Fausto Pocar Judge Liu Daqun Judge Carmel Agius Registrar: Mr. Adama Dieng Judgement of: 16 November 2009 PROTAIS ZIGIRANYIRAZO v. THE PROSECUTOR Case No. ICTR-01-73-A JUDGEMENT Counsel for Protais Zigiranyirazo: Mr. John Philpot Mr. Peter Zaduk Ms. Fiona Gray Mr. Kyle Gervais The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Hassan Bubacar Jallow Mr. Alex Obote-Odora Ms. Christine Graham Ms. Linda Bianchi Ms. Béatrice Chapaux Mr. Alfred Orono Orono I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 A. BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................. 1 B. THE APPEALS ............................................................................................................................... 2 II. STANDARDS OF APPELLATE REVIEW ............................................................................... 3 III. APPEAL OF PROTAIS ZIGIRANYIRAZO ........................................................................... 5 A. ALLEGED ERRORS IN EVALUATING THE ALIBI (GROUNDS 6 AND 12) ........................................... 5 1. Burden of Proof in the Assessment of Alibi ............................................................................ 5 2. Alleged Errors in Evaluating
    [Show full text]
  • Amended Indictment of 31 August2004 Without the Needto Sendthe New Amendedindictment of the Languagesection
    InternationalCriminal Tribunal for Rwanda TribunalPénal Internationalpour le Rwanda UNITEDNATIONS NATIONSUNIES ArushaInternational Conference Centre P.O.Box6016, Arusha, Tanzania - B.P.6016, Arusha, Tanzanie Tel:255 27 4207-11/2504367-72 or 1 212 963 2850Fax: 255 27 2504000/4373or 1 212 963 2848 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM -- MEMORANDUM INTERIEUR To" Mr. ConstantHometowu Date: 8 March~{~1~ U Coordinator,Trial Chamber III Ref: () ! From: StëPô:TrîâïPtto~’e~y~(~, )~¢ . r2J ~ Media/AkazuTeam J~,53 -0 Subject: Filingof AmendedIndictment in compliancewith the TrialCha~tber’s o’i decisionof 2 March2005 in Prosecutorv. Zigiranyirazo,ICTR-~01-73-I -- oe 1. Kindlyfind attached the AmendedIndictment for filingin compliancewith the TrialChamber’s decision of 2 March2005. 2. Ailthe deletions and additions required by saidDecision have been made in this AmendedIndictment. Regarding the directionin ParagraphII(3) on page8 theDecision "to insert names of unprotectedwitnesses in therelevant paragraphs as statedin paragraph25 [thisis believedto be 22]above," the Prosecution notes thatthe statementof its witness(SGO) does not giveany furthernames of the membersof the Sekimonyofamily or Bahomatutsi clan. However, its witness AKK does not providethe namesof 11 victimsof the killingson Keshoor GashiheHill. These have been set forth in revisedparagraphs 13 and30. 3. As the TrialChamber focused on theallegation that Kesho or GashiheHill and RumgaHill were in the samesecteur (following the receiptof the corrected informationthat there were not in thesame cellule), and for the sake of accuracy, the referencesto Kabayengocellule have been omitted from revised paragraphs 12,14, 29 and31. 4, Alsoattached is an annexureshowing the deletions and omissions. 5. Alsoattached is Frenchversion of theIndictment. This has been prepared by the Prosecutionin the interests of time.Essentially ail of theadditions to thetext involveddates and names.Most of the requiredchanges were deletions.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Security Council
    United Nations A/62/284–S/2007/502 General Assembly Distr.: General 21 August 2007 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Sixty-second session Sixty-second year Item 76 of the provisional agenda* Report of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Genocide and Other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Rwanda and Rwandan Citizens Responsible for Genocide and Other Such Violations Committed in the Territory of Neighbouring States between 1 January and 31 December 1994 Report of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Genocide and Other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Rwanda and Rwandan Citizens Responsible for Genocide and Other Such Violations Committed in the Territory of Neighbouring States between 1 January and 31 December 1994 Note by the Secretary-General The Secretary-General has the honour to transmit to the members of the General Assembly and to the members of the Security Council the twelfth annual report of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Genocide and Other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Rwanda and Rwandan Citizens Responsible for Genocide and Other Such Violations Committed in the Territory of Neighbouring States between 1 January and 31 December 1994, submitted by the President of the International Tribunal for Rwanda in accordance with article 32 of its statute (see Security Council resolution 955 (1994), annex), which states: “The President of the International Tribunal for Rwanda shall submit an annual report of the International Tribunal for Rwanda to the Security Council and to the General Assembly.” __________________ * A/62/150.
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda's Forgotten Years
    journal of international peacekeeping 22 (2018) 40-59 JOUP brill.com/joup Rwanda’s Forgotten Years Reconsidering the Role and Crimes of Akazu 1973–1993 Andrew Wallis University of Cambridge [email protected] Abstract The narrative on the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda has become remark- able in recent years for airbrushing the responsibility of those at its heart from the tragedy. The figure of President Juvenal Habyarimana, whose 21-year rule, along with the unofficial network based around his wife and family, the Akazu, has been largely marginalised. Yet to understand April 1994 requires a far longer-term understanding. Those responsible had grown their power, influence and ambition for decades inside every part of Rwandan society after seizing power in their coup of 1973; they had estab- lished personal and highly lucrative bonds with European and North American coun- tries, financial institutions and the Vatican, all of whom variously assisted with finan- cial, political, diplomatic and military support from 1973 into 1994. This chapter seeks to outline how Akazu built its powerbase, influence and ambition in the two decades before 1994 and the failure of its international backers to respond to repeated warning signs of a tragedy foretold. Keywords genocide – Akazu – Habyarimana – Parmehutu – Network Zero The official Independence Day celebrations that got underway on Sunday 1 July 1973 came as Rwanda teetered on the edge of an expected coup. Eleven years after independence the one party regime of President Grégoire Kayiban- da was imploding. Hit by economic and political stagnation, notably the dam- aging failure to share the trappings of power with those outside his central © Andrew Wallis, 2020 | doi:10.1163/18754112-0220104004 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0Downloaded License.
    [Show full text]
  • Genocide, War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity
    GENOCIDE, WAR CRIMES HUMAN AND CRIMES RIGHTS AGAINST HUMANITY WATCH A Digest of the Case Law of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Genocide, War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity A Digest of the Case Law of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Copyright © 2010 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-586-5 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org ii GENOCIDE, WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: A DIGEST OF THE CASE LAW OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RWANDA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................... iv DEDICATION ....................................................................................................... v FOREWORD ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal Judgement, Para
    Tribunal pénal international pour le Rwanda International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda UNITED NATIONS NATIONS UNIES IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER Before: Judge Theodor Meron, Presiding Judge Mehmet Güney Judge Fausto Pocar Judge Liu Daqun Judge Carmel Agius Registrar: Mr. Adama Dieng Judgement of: 16 November 2009 PROTAIS ZIGIRANYIRAZO v. THE PROSECUTOR Case No. ICTR-01-73-A JUDGEMENT Counsel for Protais Zigiranyirazo: Mr. John Philpot Mr. Peter Zaduk Ms. Fiona Gray Mr. Kyle Gervais The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Hassan Bubacar Jallow Mr. Alex Obote-Odora Ms. Christine Graham Ms. Linda Bianchi Ms. Béatrice Chapaux Mr. Alfred Orono Orono I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 A. BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................. 1 B. THE APPEALS ............................................................................................................................... 2 II. STANDARDS OF APPELLATE REVIEW ............................................................................... 3 III. APPEAL OF PROTAIS ZIGIRANYIRAZO ........................................................................... 5 A. ALLEGED ERRORS IN EVALUATING THE ALIBI (GROUNDS 6 AND 12) ........................................... 5 1. Burden of Proof in the Assessment of Alibi ............................................................................ 5 2. Alleged Errors in Evaluating
    [Show full text]
  • Judge Inés Mónica Weinberg De Roca, Presiding Judge Khalida Rachid Khan Judge Lee Gacuiga Muthoga
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Tribunal pénal international pour le Rwanda UNITED NATIONS NATIONS UNIES OR: ENG TRIAL CHAMBER III Before: Judge Inés Mónica Weinberg de Roca, presiding Judge Khalida Rachid Khan Judge Lee Gacuiga Muthoga Registrar: Adama Dieng Date: 18 December 2008 THE PROSECUTOR v. Protais ZIGIRANYIRAZO Case No. ICTR-01-73-T JUDGEMENT Office of the Prosecutor: Wallace Kapaya Charity Kagwi-Ndungu Gina Butler Iskandar Ismail Jane Mukangira Counsel for the Accused: John Philpot Peter Zaduk The Prosecutor v. Protais Zigiranyirazo, Case No. ICTR-01-73-T TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 4 1. THE TRIBUNAL AND ITS JURISDICTION ....................................................................... 4 2. THE ACCUSED ............................................................................................................ 4 3. INDICTMENT ............................................................................................................... 5 4. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURAL HISTORY ........................................................................ 5 5. OVERVIEW OF THE CASE ............................................................................................ 5 CHAPTER II: FACTUAL FINDINGS ....................................................................... 7 1. PRELIMINARY MATTERS ............................................................................................. 7 1.1. Judicial Notice ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Patterns of Acceptance. International Criminal Justice After the Rwandan Genocide Content
    Changing Patterns of Acceptance. International Criminal Justice after the Rwandan Genocide Content 1 Introduction 2 International Criminal Justice in Rwanda Patrick Rowanda and Susanne Buckley-Zistel 3 International Criminal Justice in the Rwandan Public Eye: a Necessity with Many Downsides 4 Conclusion 5 Bibliography Changing Patterns of Acceptance. International Criminal Justice after the Rwandan Genocide Changing Patterns of Acceptance. International Criminal Justice after the Rwandan Genocide Patrick Rowanda1 and Susanne Buckley-Zistel2 1. Introduction On 7 April 1994, after an attack on an aircraft carrying the then President of Rwanda Juvénal Habyarimana, a killing machine moved into action in an attempt to extinguish all Tutsi in the Central African country, Rwanda. In just 100 days, about 800,000 Tutsi, as well as a number of Hutu political opponents, were murdered by Hutu militias, government troops and Hutu community members. In many ways, the Rwandan genocide remains an unprecedented example of violence and terror at the end of the 20th century. Although tragic, the Rwandan genocide did not happen in a vacuum, but in the midst of a democratisation process following a four-year insurgency by the Tutsi-led Rwanda Patriotic Front/Army (RPF/A) of General Paul Kagame, now President of Rwanda. Sparked by the insurgency and the subsequent pressure of the international community to share power and to allow democratic multi-party elections, Habyarimana’s people incited nation-wide violence and hate through spreading fear of a Tutsi victory and the ensuing suppression of all Hutu. Given the history of the country in which violence against the Tutsi had occurred before, these hate discourses fell on fertile ground, leading even family members to turn against each other.
    [Show full text]