DOCSLIB.ORG

The USSR and the Cold War J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Access to History for the IB Diploma The Cold War David G. Williamson To Sue The material in this title has been developed independently of the International Baccalaureate®, which in no way endorses it. The Publishers would like to thank the following for permission to reproduce copyright material: Photo credits p.18 The Granger Collection, NYC/TopFoto/Cartoon by C. Berryman published in the Washington Star, 9 October 1939; p.34 © Hulton-Deutsch Collection/CORBIS; p.45 British Cartoon Archive, University of Kent/artwork © Alex Marengo; p.77 © dpa/Corbis; p.89 Press Office of the Government of Germany; p.111 Xinhua News Agency/Eyevine; p.114 TopFoto; p.115 © Bettmann/CORBIS; p.122 Xinhua News Agency/Eyevine; p.131 AFP/Getty Images; p.143 Press Office of the Government of Germany; p.155 Jack Esten/Picture Post/Getty Images; p.170 Press Office of the Government of Germany; p.180 TopFoto; p.189 © Bettmann/CORBIS; p.199 © Bettmann/CORBIS; p.208 © Bettmann/CORBIS; p.249 Keystone/Getty Images; p.261 Sahm Doherty/ Time Life Pictures/Getty Images; p.264 © Pascal Manoukian/Sygma/Corbis; p.289 culture-images/TopFoto. Acknowledgements Norman Davies: Table: Statistics of Poland’s trade balance from 1950–76 in millions of convertible zloty from God’s Playground – A History of Poland, Volume 2 (Oxford University Press, 2005), reproduced by permission of the publisher; C.S. Maier: Tables: ‘Numbers of visitors from the GDR to the FRG’ and ‘Total indebtedness to the West’ from Dissolution: The Crisis of Communism and the End of East Germany (Princeton University Press, 1997), © 1997 Princeton University Press, reprinted by permission of Princeton University Press; Christian Ostermann: ‘The United States and the East German Uprising of 1953 and the Limits of Rollback’ from Cold War International History Project (Woodrow Wilson Center for Scholars, 1994), reproduced by permission of the author; Richard Sakwa: Table: ‘Republics of the USSR’ from Soviet Politics in Perspective (Routledge, 1998), reproduced by permission of Taylor & Francis Books (UK); G. Swain and N. Swain: Tables: ‘State control of industrial output and trade in 1952’ and ‘Collectivization of agriculture in eastern Europe’ from Eastern Europe since 1945 (Palgrave Macmillan, 1993), reproduced by permission of the publisher; M. Walker: Table: ‘Numbers of US and Soviet nuclear launchers and warheads, 1962–80’ from The Cold War (Vintage, 1993). Every effort has been made to trace all copyright holders, but if any have been inadvertently overlooked the Publishers will be pleased to make the necessary arrangements at the first opportunity. Although every effort has been made to ensure that website addresses are correct at time of going to press, Hodder Education cannot be held responsible for the content of any website mentioned in this book. It is sometimes possible to find a relocated web page by typing in the address of the home page for a website in the URL window of your browser. Hachette UK’s policy is to use papers that are natural, renewable and recyclable products and made from wood grown in sustainable forests. The logging and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental regulations of the country of origin. Orders: please contact Bookpoint Ltd, 130 Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4SB. Telephone: +44 (0)1235 827720. Fax: +44 (0)1235 400454. Lines are open 9.00a.m.–5.00p.m., Monday to Saturday, with a 24-hour message answering service. Visit our website at www.hoddereducation.co.uk © David G. Williamson 2013 First published in 2013 by Hodder Education, An Hachette UK Company 338 Euston Road London NW1 3BH Impression number 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Year 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 All rights reserved. Apart from any use permitted under UK copyright law, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or held within any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or under licence from the Copyright Licensing Agency Limited. Further details of such licences (for reprographic reproduction) may be obtained from the Copyright Licensing Agency Limited, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Cover photo © The Granger Collection/TopFoto Illustrations by Barking Dog Art Typeset in 10/13pt Palatino and produced by Integra Software Services Pvt. Ltd., Pondicherry, India Printed in Italy A catalogue record for this title is available from the British Library ISBN 978 14441 56478 Contents Introduction 4 1 What you will study 4 2 How you will be assessed 5 3 About this book 7 CHAPTER 1 The origins of the Cold War, 1917–45 10 1 The ideology of the Cold War 10 2 The Soviet Union and the Western powers, 1917–41 14 3 The Grand Alliance, 1941–45 20 4 The liberation of Europe, 1943–45 25 5 The Yalta Conference, February 1945 33 Examination advice 38 Examination practice 41 Activities 41 CHAPTER 2 From wartime allies to post-war enemies, 1945–47 42 1 Transition from war to fragile peace, 1945–46 42 2 Germany, June 1945–April 1947 50 3 The Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan 54 4 The ‘Iron Curtain’ 59 5 Key debate: Did the US or the USSR start the Cold War, 1945–47 67 Examination advice 70 Examination practice 73 Activities 73 CHAPTER 3 The division of Germany and Europe, 1948–52 74 1 The division of Germany 74 2 Western European rearmament 82 3 The consolidation of the rival blocs 90 Examination advice 98 Examination practice 101 Activities 101 CHAPTER 4 The spread of communism in Asia, 1945–54 102 1 Japan and the Cold War, 1945–52 102 2 The Chinese Civil War 107 3 The Korean War, 1950–53 117 4 Indochina, 1945–54 128 Examination advice 134 Examination practice 137 Activities 137 CHAPTER 5 From détente to the Berlin Wall, 1953–61 138 1 The thaw, 1953–55 138 2 The emergence of the Third World and the Non-Aligned Movement 148 3 1956: The year of crises 152 4 The aftermath of the Hungarian and Suez Crises, 1957–58 160 5 The Berlin Crisis, 1958–61 164 Examination advice 172 Examination practice 175 Activities 175 CHAPTER 6 The global Cold War, 1960–78 176 1 The Sino-Soviet split 176 2 The Congo Crisis, 1960–65 181 3 The Cuban Missile Crisis, 1962 186 4 Vietnam, 1954–75 194 5 The Cold War in the Middle East, 1957–79 209 6 The Cold War in Africa, 1964–79 218 Examination advice 228 Examination practice 231 Activities 231 CHAPTER 7 The politics of détente, 1963–79 232 1 US–Soviet relations, 1963–72 232 2 Détente in Europe, 1963–69 240 3 Ostpolitik 247 4 Helsinki Accords and SALT II, 1975–79 251 Examination advice 256 Examination practice 259 Activities 259 CHAPTER 8 The end of the Cold War 260 1 ‘New Cold War’, 1976–85 260 2 Mikhail Gorbachev and renewed détente, 1985–89 270 3 The collapse of communism in eastern Europe, 1989–90 279 4 Collapse of the USSR 292 Examination advice 302 Examination practice 305 Activities 305 Glossary 306 Timeline 312 Further reading 315 Internal assessment 319 Index 321 Dedication Dedicated to Keith Randell (1943–2002) The original Access to History series was conceived and developed by Keith, who created a series to ‘cater for students as they are, not as we might wish them to be’. He leaves a living legacy of a series that for over 20 years has provided a trusted, stimulating and well-loved accompaniment to post-16 study. Our aim with these new editions for the IB is to continue to offer students the best possible support for their studies. 3 Introduction This book has been written to support your study of Topic 5: The Cold War for IB History Diploma Route 2 Paper 2. This first chapter gives you an overview of: ✪ the content you will study for the Cold War ✪ how you will be assessed for Paper 2 ✪ the different features of this book and how these will aid your learning. 1 What you will study The late twentieth century witnessed the Cold War. The end of the Second World War brought two superpowers, the United States (US) and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), to the fore of international relations. Both states had vast territories, with large populations, tremendous national resources and major industrial complexes. They both fielded large militaries that had defeated Axis states in the Second World War and each represented a specific governing and economic structure. The US generally stood for democratically elected governments that espoused free trade or capitalism, while the USSR was a communist state in which there was only one political party, the Communist Party, and the economy was primarily directed by the state. These competing economic and government models, along with the need for each to create alliances for their security and the security of their allies, had worldwide consequences as each state attempted to gain further allies, spread their economic and governing systems and competed militarily, both in terms of quantity and technology. The Cold War is an interesting topic of study. The competition between the US and the USSR and their allies had economic consequences for Europe and many other parts of the world. Various wars, such as those in Korea, Vietnam and Afghanistan resulted, in part, from the desire to either limit or spread communism or capitalism. While the Cold War may often be seen as a period in which the world was often seemingly on the threshold of nuclear warfare, it may also be interpreted as an era in which the search for peace and security were paramount concerns for many nations’ leaders.
Recommended publications
  • The Regime Change Consensus: Iraq in American Politics, 1990-2003

    The Regime Change Consensus: Iraq in American Politics, 1990-2003

    THE REGIME CHANGE CONSENSUS: IRAQ IN AMERICAN POLITICS, 1990-2003 Joseph Stieb A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the College of Arts and Sciences. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Wayne Lee Michael Morgan Benjamin Waterhouse Daniel Bolger Hal Brands ©2019 Joseph David Stieb ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Joseph David Stieb: The Regime Change Consensus: Iraq in American Politics, 1990-2003 (Under the direction of Wayne Lee) This study examines the containment policy that the United States and its allies imposed on Iraq after the 1991 Gulf War and argues for a new understanding of why the United States invaded Iraq in 2003. At the core of this story is a political puzzle: Why did a largely successful policy that mostly stripped Iraq of its unconventional weapons lose support in American politics to the point that the policy itself became less effective? I argue that, within intellectual and policymaking circles, a claim steadily emerged that the only solution to the Iraqi threat was regime change and democratization. While this “regime change consensus” was not part of the original containment policy, a cohort of intellectuals and policymakers assembled political support for the idea that Saddam’s personality and the totalitarian nature of the Baathist regime made Iraq uniquely immune to “management” strategies like containment. The entrenchment of this consensus before 9/11 helps explain why so many politicians, policymakers, and intellectuals rejected containment after 9/11 and embraced regime change and invasion.
  • Russia's Role in the Horn of Africa

    Russia's Role in the Horn of Africa

    Russia Foreign Policy Papers “E O” R’ R H A SAMUEL RAMANI FOREIGN POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE • RUSSIA FOREIGN POLICY PAPERS 1 All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Author: Samuel Ramani The views expressed in this report are those of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Foreign Policy Research Institute, a non-partisan organization that seeks to publish well-argued, policy- oriented articles on American foreign policy and national security priorities. Eurasia Program Leadership Director: Chris Miller Deputy Director: Maia Otarashvili Editing: Thomas J. Shattuck Design: Natalia Kopytnik © 2020 by the Foreign Policy Research Institute July 2020 OUR MISSION The Foreign Policy Research Institute is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the United States. We educate those who make and influence policy, as well as the public at large, through the lens of history, geography, and culture. Offering Ideas In an increasingly polarized world, we pride ourselves on our tradition of nonpartisan scholarship. We count among our ranks over 100 affiliated scholars located throughout the nation and the world who appear regularly in national and international media, testify on Capitol Hill, and are consulted by U.S. government agencies. Educating the American Public FPRI was founded on the premise that an informed and educated citizenry is paramount for the U.S.
  • The Origins of the Angolan Civil War

    The Origins of the Angolan Civil War

    The Origins of the Angolan Civil War The Origins of the Angolan Civil War Foreign Intervention and Domestic Political Conflict Fernando Andresen Guimaraes First published in paperback in Great Britain 2001 by MACMILLAN PRESS LTD Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and London Companies and representatives throughout the world A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 978-1-349-26184-0 ISBN 978-0-333-97766-8 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-0-333-97766-8 First published in paperback in the United States of America 2001 by ST. MARTIN'S PRESS, LLC, Scholarly and Reference Division, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 ISBN 978-0-312-17512-2 cloth ISBN 978-0-333-91480-9 paperback The Library of Congress has cataloged the hardcover edition as follows: Guimaraes, Femando Andresen, 1965- The origins of the Angolan civil war: foreign intervention and domestic political conflict / Femando Andresen Guimaraes. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-312-17512-2 (cloth) I. Angola-History-Civil war, 1975- -Causes. 1. Title. DTl428.G85 1997 967.304-dc21 97-9652 CIP © Femando Andresen Guimaraes 1998. 200 I First edition 1998 Reprinted with new Preface 200 I All rights reserved. No reproduction. copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced. copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright. Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency.
  • Angola Background Paper

    Angola Background Paper

    NATIONS UNIES UNITED NATIONS HAUT COMMISSARIAT HIGH COMMISSIONER POUR LES REFUGIES FOR REFUGEES BACKGROUND PAPER ON REFUGEES AND ASYLUM SEEKERS FROM ANGOLA UNHCR CENTRE FOR DOCUMENTATION AND RESEARCH GENEVA, APRIL 1999 THIS INFORMATION PAPER WAS PREPARED IN THE COUNTRY INFORMATION UNIT OF UNHCR’S CENTRE FOR DOCUMENTATION AND RESEARCH ON THE BASIS OF PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION, ANALYSIS AND COMMENT, IN COLLABORATION WITH THE UNHCR STATISTICAL UNIT. ALL SOURCES ARE CITED. THIS PAPER IS NOT, AND DOES NOT, PURPORT TO BE, FULLY EXHAUSTIVE WITH REGARD TO CONDITIONS IN THE COUNTRY SURVEYED, OR CONCLUSIVE AS TO THE MERITS OF ANY PARTICULAR CLAIM TO REFUGEE STATUS OR ASYLUM. PREFACE Angola has been an important source country of refugees and asylum-seekers over a number of years. This paper seeks to define the scope, destination, and causes of their flight. The first and second part of the paper contains information regarding the conditions in the country of origin, which are often invoked by asylum-seekers when submitting their claim for refugee status. The Country Information Unit of UNHCR's Centre for Documentation and Research (CDR) conducts its work on the basis of publicly available information, analysis and comment, with all sources cited. In the third part, the paper provides a statistical overview of refugees and asylum-seekers from Angola in the main European asylum countries, describing current trends in the number and origin of asylum requests as well as the results of their status determination. The data are derived from government statistics made available to UNHCR and are compiled by its Statistical Unit. Table of Contents 1.
  • MILITANT LIBERALISM and ITS DISCONTENTS: on the DECOLONIAL ORIGINS of ENDLESS WAR a Dissertation Presented to the Faculty Of

    MILITANT LIBERALISM and ITS DISCONTENTS: on the DECOLONIAL ORIGINS of ENDLESS WAR a Dissertation Presented to the Faculty Of

    MILITANT LIBERALISM AND ITS DISCONTENTS: ON THE DECOLONIAL ORIGINS OF ENDLESS WAR A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Aaron B Gavin December 2017 © 2017 Aaron B Gavin MILITANT LIBERALISM AND ITS DISCONTENTS: ON THE DECOLONIAL ORIGINS OF ENDLESS WAR Aaron B Gavin, Ph. D. Cornell University 2017 MILITANT LIBERALISM AND ITS DISCONTENTS tells a story about the reinvention of liberalism during the era of decolonization. The dissertation shows how a persistent pattern of militant liberalism came to structure the postwar international order—one where the United States engages in militant action to protect the liberal international order from irredeemable illiberal threats, precisely when its hegemonic influence reaches its limit. While anti-totalitarianism and the war on terror are defining episodes in the development of this pattern, the dissertation argues that it was only liberalism’s encounter with decolonization that made the practice of militant liberalism ideologically coherent and enduring. After shattering the civilizational justifications of nineteenth century liberalism, decolonization provided militant liberals with a unique enemy, the Third World, upon which to distinguish and legitimate their own logic of violence, all while destroying alternative political possibilities arising out of the decolonial process. The dissertation explores these themes through four political thinkers—Isaiah Berlin, Louis Henkin, Frantz Fanon, and Carl Schmitt—and narrates a story about the legitimation of militant liberalism and the eventual rise of its discontents. On the one hand, Berlin and Henkin spoke of Thirdworldism as uniquely threatening: the former arguing that Thirdworldist nationalism often morphed into romantic self-assertion, and the latter claiming that Thirdworldists exploited state sovereignty allowing international terrorism to proliferate unbound.
  • Refugee Exodus from Somalia: Revisiting the Causes Hassan A

    Refugee Exodus from Somalia: Revisiting the Causes Hassan A

    Refugee Exodus from Somalia: Revisiting the Causes Hassan A. Mohamed Rhmc? needed to be rescued from themselves Cet article se propose d'exarniner les causes du conflit Somalien qui a (Rakia 1992). provoque l'exode de plus de deux millions de rkfugies. Par une approche It is unfortunate that the discourse historique du developpement de la tra@die, l'auteur offre une perspective on the crisis in Somalia has so far ig- plus complexe et tres differente de celle offerte par les medias qui se nored the complex historical develop- cantonnent dans des discussions simplistes et superficielles des symptbmes ment of the tragedy. Abdi Samatar actuels. Pour Hassan Mohammed, les causes de la crise Somalienne sont liees (1992, 626) aptly described the prob- Bun processus de desintegration de la societe civile et de ses valeurs sociales, lem: culturelleset politiques, une desintegration qui resulte de quatre evhements One of the casualties of the gruesome historiques: le decoupage de la nation et du territoire Somalien en plusieurs nightmare that is gripping Somalia entites; l'impact de la guerre froide; l'imposition de systemes politique, has been the capacity to thinkhistori- culture1 et educatif &rangers B la culture Somalienne; et enfin, la manipula- cally and systematically about the nature of the malady, and to find tion et l'exploitation des divisions claniques par l'elite politique afin de practical ways of controlling the demeurer au pouvoir. present in order to build a more sus- tainable future. Introduction stream explanations. The severity of the crisis in Somalia was largely un- The failure of "Operation Restore The most recent and probably the larg- known to the outside world prior to Hope" is an apt illustration of this est refugee exodus in the history of the the televised images of starving multi- point; the good intentionsof the opera- Horn of Africa started in Somalia in tudes and marauding armed young- tion made many innocent Somalis vic- 1988.
  • A Military History of the Angolan Armed Forces from the 1960S Onwards—As Told by Former Combatants

    A Military History of the Angolan Armed Forces from the 1960S Onwards—As Told by Former Combatants

    Evolutions10.qxd 2005/09/28 12:10 PM Page 7 CHAPTER ONE A military history of the Angolan Armed Forces from the 1960s onwards—as told by former combatants Ana Leão and Martin Rupiya1 INTRODUCTION The history of the Angolan Armed Forces (FAA) remains largely unwritten—yet, understanding the FAA’s development is undoubtedly important both for future Angolan generations as well as for other sub- Saharan African countries. The FAA must first and foremost be understood as a result of several processes of integration—processes that began in the very early days of the struggle against Portuguese colonialism and ended with the April 2002 Memorandum of Understanding. Today’s FAA is a result of the integration of the armed forces of the three liberation movements that fought against the Portuguese—the MPLA (Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola), the FNLA (National Front for the Liberation of Angola) and UNITA (National Union for the Total Independence of Angola). This was a process that developed over more than 30 years. The various phases that characterise the formation and development of the FAA are closely related to Angola’s recent political history, particularly the advent of independence in 1975 and the civil war that ensued. This chapter introduces that history with a view to contributing to a clearer understanding of the development of the FAA and its current role in a peaceful Angola. As will be discussed, while the FAA was formerly established in 1992 following the provisions of the Bicesse Peace Accords, its origins go back to: 7 Evolutions10.qxd 2005/09/28 12:10 PM Page 8 8 Evolutions & Revolutions • the Popular Armed Forces for the Liberation of Angola (FAPLA) and the integration over more than three decades of elements of the Portuguese Colonial Army; • the FNLA’s Army for the National Liberation of Angola (ELNA); and • UNITA’s Armed Forces for the Liberation of Angola (FALA).
  • U.S.-Chinese Cooperation and Conflict in the Angolan Civil Arw

    U.S.-Chinese Cooperation and Conflict in the Angolan Civil Arw

    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Dissertations and Theses City College of New York 2014 U.S.-Chinese Cooperation and Conflict in the Angolan Civil arW Morgan Hess CUNY City College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cc_etds_theses/268 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Abstract This study examines China’s role in the Angolan Civil War through the context of U.S.-Chinese rapprochement and the global Cold War. Based on declassified conversations between U.S. and Chinese officials along with declassified intelligence cables, government documents, and research in the United Nations archives this paper illuminates how China played a crucial role in escalating the Angolan Civil War and encouraged U.S. intervention in the conflict. This study builds on previous scholarship yet takes a new approach that emphasizes China played the primary role in intensifying the Angolan Civil War, not the U.S. or Soviet Union. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! “Empty Cannons” U.S.-Chinese Cooperation and Conflict in the Angolan Civil War Morgan Hess Dr. Craig Daigle May 3rd, 2012 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of (Fine) Arts of the City College of the City University of New York Table of Contents 1) Introduction 1 2) Portuguese Colonialism, African Resistance, and Angola’s Independence 5 3) U.S.-Chinese Diplomacy Surrounding Angola 14 4) Motives Behind China’s Angolan Policies 20 5) Foreign Aid, Intervention, and Escalation 26 6) Recognition of Angola and Effects of the War 39 7) Conclusion 42 8) Bibliography 46 ! Introduction Angola, China, and the United States.
  • Causes of Civil War Duration: Mozambique and Angola by the Method of Difference

    Causes of Civil War Duration: Mozambique and Angola by the Method of Difference

    研究論文 ARTICLE Causes of Civil War Duration: Mozambique and Angola by the Method of Difference Kayo NAKAZAWA Forum of International Development Studies. 48―5（Mar. 2018） Causes of Civil War Duration: Mozambique and Angola by the Method of Difference Kayo NAKAZAWA＊ Abstract This research empirically examines the causes of the civil war duration gap between the civil wars of Mozambique and Angola by the method of difference. Mozambique and Angola are comparable cases, so they are best-fit cases for this method. The research proposes external state intervention, state capacity, weapons industry, UN Trust Fund, and type of natural resources as tentative independent variables. This research explores causality between each independent variable and dependent variable by process tracing on qualitative scales and employs a combination of area studies and statistical analysis to reinforce each tentative independent variable. The historical discourse also covers the internal validity problem of small-N studies by process tracing. This research concludes that UN Trust Fund and type of natural resources are both genuine variables to determine 10 years of civil war duration gap between the two states. The results of the analysis are applicable to Mozambique and Angola from 1975 to 2002 and show limited generalization. Keywords : Mozambique, Angola, Civil War Duration, Method of Difference, Process Tracing 1. Introduction Mozambique and Angola, which are part of Lusophone Africa, are located in southern Africa. They share similarities in terms of historical, social, political, and economic dimensions that they do not have in common with other Lusophone states. Moreover, both states have experienced long civil wars. However, there is a duration gap between the civil wars of these two states.
  • Leading Factors for the Somalian Invasion of Ogaden: Foreign Intervention, and the Ethiopian Response (1977-1978)

    Leading Factors for the Somalian Invasion of Ogaden: Foreign Intervention, and the Ethiopian Response (1977-1978)

    International Journal of Social Science Studies Vol. 6, No. 6; June 2018 ISSN 2324-8033 E-ISSN 2324-8041 Published by Redfame Publishing URL: http://ijsss.redfame.com Leading Factors for the Somalian Invasion of Ogaden: Foreign Intervention, and the Ethiopian Response (1977-1978) Wondim Tiruneh Zeleke1 1Instructor, Injibara College of Teachers’ Education, Department of Social Science, Ethiopia Correspondence: Wondim Tiruneh Zeleke, Instructor, Injibara College of Teachers’ Education, Department of Social Science, Ethiopia. Received: April 12, 2018 Accepted: April 26, 2018 Available online: May 25, 2018 doi:10.11114/ijsss.v6i6.3301 URL: https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v6i6.3301 Abstract The main objective of this paper is to assess the historical out line on the Dynamics of Conflict and Intervention in North -East Africa: The Case Study on the Second Ethio- Somalian (Ogaden) War of 1977-1978. Hence, the Ogaden war, a brief but costly war fought between Ethiopia and Somalia that ended by the defeat of Somalia and her withdrawal in January, 1978 was seen differently by different sides. Opposing foreign intervention in civil wars has also been a central phenomenon of international politics. The war was aggravated by outsiders for many years and in 1970s, above all by the superpowers, namely, the USA and USSR, and also by their contingents. At the heart of the issues underlying the War in the Horn of Africa lie three legacies of the past: namely; European colonial rule; Somali irredentism; and superpowers intervention/ Afyare Abdi Elmi and Abdullahi Barise; 2006:45/. This conflict can be viewed as a meaningless tragedy for the people of the Horn of Africa in general and Somalia in particular.
  • America's War in Angola, 1961-1976 Alexander Joseph Marino University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

    America's War in Angola, 1961-1976 Alexander Joseph Marino University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 5-2015 America's War in Angola, 1961-1976 Alexander Joseph Marino University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the African History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Marino, Alexander Joseph, "America's War in Angola, 1961-1976" (2015). Theses and Dissertations. 1167. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1167 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. America’s War in Angola, 1961-1976 America’s War in Angola, 1961-1976 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History by Alexander J. Marino University of California, Santa Barbara Bachelor of Arts in History, 2008 May 2015 University of Arkansas This thesis is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council ______________________________________ Dr. Randall B. Woods Thesis Director ______________________________________ Dr. Andrea Arrington Committee Member ______________________________________ Dr. Alessandro Brogi Committee Member ABSTRACT A study of the role played by the United States in Angola’s War of Independence and the Angolan Civil War up to 1976. DEDICATION To Lisa. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................
  • “Buried in the Sands of the Ogaden”: the United States, the Horn of Africa and the Demise of Detente

    “Buried in the Sands of the Ogaden”: the United States, the Horn of Africa and the Demise of Detente

    “Buried in the Sands of the Ogaden”: The United States, The Horn of Africa and The Demise of Detente. Louise Prentis Woodroofe London School of Economics and Political Science PhD International History UMI Number: U615656 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615656 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Abstract The decade of the 1970s, despite representing the era of detente, superficially appeared to be one of Soviet successes and American setbacks. From Vietnam to Angola, the USSR seemed to be gaining Marxist friends in the Third World. Because of this, the Soviet Union wanted the United States to recognize it as an equal power in the world. With such acknowledgement, the Kremlin believed that negotiations to limit the arms race would then be mutually beneficial. On the other hand, President Nixon and Secretary of State Kissinger interpreted detente as a series of agreements and compromises to draw Moscow into an international system through which the United States could exercise some control over Soviet foreign relations, particularly with the Third World.