DOCSLIB.ORG

Global Standard for Responsible Supply of Marine Ingredients Fishery Assessment Methodology and Template Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Global Standard for Responsible Supply of Marine Ingredients Fishery Assessment Methodology and Template Report IFFO RS Global Standard for Responsible Supply of Marine Ingredients Global Standard for Responsible Supply of Marine Ingredients Fishery Assessment Methodology and Template Report Version No.: 2.0 Date: July 2017 Fishery Under Mauritanian Small Pelagics - Purse seine Assessment Date 10 March 2018 Tom Evans Assessor Application details and summary of the assessment outcome Name: Key Traceability Address: 70 Londesborough Road, Southsea Country: UK Zip: PO4 0EX Tel. No. NA Fax. No. NA Email address: Applicant Code NA [email protected] Key Contact: Tom Evans Title: Mr Certification Body Details IFFO RS v2 Name of Certification Body: Assessor Name Peer Reviewer Assessment Initial/Surveillance Whole fish / Days / Re-approval By-product Tom Evans Jo Gascoigne na na na Assessment Period na Scope Details Mauritania Management Authority (Country/State) Round Sardinella (S.aurita) Main Species Cunene horse mackerel (T.trecae) Flat Sardinella (S.maderensis) Chub mackerel (S.japonicus) European Pilchard (S.pilchardus) Atlantic Horse Mackerel (T.trachurus) Bonga Shad (Ethmalosa fimbriate) Area 34 Fishery Location Purse Seine Gear Type(s) Outcome of Assessment Overall Outcome Fail Clauses Failed M2 - Management B – Round Sardinella B - Cunene horse Mackerel B – Flat Sardinella B – Chub Mackerel B - Atlantic Horse Mackerel B – Bonga Shad D- False Scad F1, F3 - Environment Peer Review Evaluation Recommendation Assessment Determination Peer Review Comments Notes for On-site Auditor Note: This table should be completed for whole fish assessments only. General Results General Clause Outcome (Pass/Fail) M1 - Management Framework Pass M2 - Surveillance, Control and Enforcement Fail F1 - Impacts on ETP Species Fail F2 - Impacts on Habitats Pass F3 - Ecosystem Impacts Fail Species-Specific Results Category Species % landings Outcome (2014-2016) (Pass/Fail) Category B Round sardinella 36.2 Fail (Sardinella aurita) Category B Cunene horse mackerel 22.2 Fail (Trachurus trecae) Category B Flat sardinella 11.1 Fail (Sardinella maderensis) Category B Chub mackerel 9.3 Fail (Scomber japonicus) Category B European Pilchard 8.5 Pass (Sardina pilchardus) Category B Atlantic Horse Mackerel 7.0 Fail (Trachurus trachurus) Category B Bonga Shad 5.2 Fail (Ethmalosa fimbriata) Category D False Scad 0.3 Fail (Caranx rhonchus) Category D European Anchovy 0.2 Pass (Engraulis encrasicolus) [List all Category A and B species. List approximate total % age of landings which are Category C and D species; these do not need to be individually named here] HOW TO COMPLETE THIS ASSESSMENT REPORT This assessment template uses a modular approach to assessing fisheries against the IFFO RS standard. Whole Fish The process for completing the template for a whole fish assessment is as follows: 1. ALL ASSESSMENTS: Complete the Species Characterisation table, to determine which categories of species are present in the fishery. 2. ALL ASSESSMENTS: Complete clauses M1, M2, M3: Management. 3. IF THERE ARE CATEGORY A SPECIES IN THE FISHERY: Complete clauses A1, A2, A3, A4 for each Category A species. 4. IF THERE ARE CATEGORY B SPECIES IN THE FISHERY: Complete the Section B risk assessment for each Category B species. 5. IF THERE ARE CATEGORY C SPECIES IN THE FISHERY: Complete clause C1 for each Category C species. 6. IF THERE ARE CATEGORY D SPECIES IN THE FISHERY: Complete Section D. 7. ALL ASSESSMENTS: Complete clauses F1, F2, F3: Further Impacts. A fishery must score a pass in all applicable clauses before approval may be recommended. To achieve a pass in a clause, the fishery/species must meet all of the minimum requirements. By-products The process for completing the template for by-product raw material is as follows: 1. ALL ASSESSMENTS: Complete the Species Characterisation table with the names of the by-product species and stocks under assessment. The ‘% landings’ column can be left empty; all by-products are considered as Category C and D. 2. IF THERE ARE CATEGORY C BYPRODUCTS UNDER ASSESSMENT: Complete clause C1 for each Category C by-product. 3. IF THERE ARE CATEGORY D BYPRODUCTS UNDER ASSESSMENT: Complete Section D. 4. ALL OTHER SECTIONS CAN BE DELETED. Clauses M1 - M3, F1 - F3, and Sections A and B do not need to be completed for a by-product assessment. By-product approval is awarded on a species-by-species basis. Each by-product species scoring a pass under the appropriate section may be approved against the IFFO RS Standard. SPECIES CATEGORISATION The following table should be completed as fully as the available information permits. Any species representing more than 0.1% of the annual catch should be listed, along with an estimate of the proportion of the catch each species represents. The species should then be divided into Type 1 and Type 2 as follows: • Type 1 Species can be considered the ‘target’ or ‘main’ species in the fishery. They make up the bulk of annual landings and are subjected to a detailed assessment. • Type 2 Species can be considered the ‘bycatch’ or ‘minor’ species in the fishery. They make up a small proportion of the annual landings and are subjected to relatively high- level assessment. Type 1 Species must represent 95% of the total annual catch. Type 2 Species may represent a maximum of 5% of the annual catch (see Appendix B). Species which make up less than 0.1% of landings do not need to be listed (NOTE: ETP species are considered separately). The table should be extended if more space is needed. Discarded species should be included when known. The ‘stock’ column should be used to differentiate when there are multiple biological or management stocks of one species captured by the fishery. The ‘management’ column should be used to indicate whether there is an adequate management regime specifically aimed at the individual species/stock. In some cases it will be immediately clear whether there is a species- specific management regime in place (for example, if there is an annual TAC). In less clear circumstances, the rule of thumb should be that if the species meets the minimum requirements of clauses A1-A4, an adequate species-specific management regime is in place. NOTE: If any species is categorised as Endangered or Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List, or if it appears in the CITES appendices, it cannot be approved for use as an IFFO RS raw material. This applied to whole fish as well as by-products. TYPE 1 SPECIES (Representing 95% of the catch or more) Category A: Species-specific management regime in place. Category B: No species-specific management regime in place. TYPE 2 SPECIES (Representing 5% OF THE CATCH OR LESS) Category C: Species-specific management regime in place. Category D: No species-specific management regime in place. Commo Latin name Stock % of Management Category n landings name (2014- 2016) * Round S. aurita FAO Area 34 - 816,000t Management Type 1 Sardinella NW Africa 36.2% measures are not Category B species specific. Cunene horse T.trecae FAO Area 34 - 500,000t Management Type 1 mackerel NW Africa 22.2% measures are not Category B species specific. Flat Sardinella S. maderensis FAO Area 34 - 251,100t Management Type 1 NW Africa 11.1% measures are Category B neither species nor stock specific. Chub mackerel S. japonicus FAO Area 34 - 210,000t Management Type 1 NE Atlantic 9.3% measures are Category B neither species nor stock specific. European S. pilchardus FAO Area 34 - 192,000t Management Type 1 Pilchard NW African 8.5% measures are not Category B Southern species specific. Stock Atlantic Horse T. trachurus FAO Area 34 - 157,900t Management Type 1 Mackerel NW Africa 7.0% measures are not Category B species specific. Bonga Shad E. fimbriata FAO Area 34 - 118,300t Management Type 1 NW Africa 5.2% measures are not Category B stock specific. False Scad C. rhonchus FAO Area 34 - 6,800t Management Type 2 NW Africa 0.3% measures are not Category D stock specific. European E. encrasicolus FAO Area 34 - 4,400t Management Type 2 Anchovy NW Africa 0.2% measures are not Category D stock specific. Total 2,256,500t 100% * Data taken from the 2016 Artisanal and semi industrial fleet. MANAGEMENT The two clauses in this section relate to the general management regime applied to the fishery under assessment. A fishery must meet all the minimum requirements in every clause before it can be recommended for approval. M1 Management Framework – Minimum Requirements M1.1 There is an organisation responsible for managing the fishery Y M1.2 There is an organisation responsible for collecting data and assessing the fishery Y M1.3 Fishery management organisations are publically committed to sustainability Y M1.4 Fishery management organisations are legally empowered to take management Y actions M1.5 There is a consultation process through which fishery stakeholders are engaged Y in decision-making M1.6 The decision-making process is transparent, with processes and results Y publically available Clause outcome: Pass Evidence The organisation responsible for managing the fishery and collecting data is the Ministry of Fisheries and the Marine Economy, who is legally empowered to put in place management measures as required to meet fishery objectives. The Institut Mauritanien de Recherche Océanographique et des Pêches (IMROP) analyses the data and provides scientific advice. At a regional level, stock assessments are carried out by CECAF (COPACE), a FAO working group made up of regional scientists. In Mauritania, the former Act no. 2000-025 of 24/01/2000, initially establishing the fisheries code amended and supplemented by Edict no. 2007-022 of 09/04/2007 and numerous enforcement decrees, was in large part replaced by Act no. 017·2015 of 29 July 2015 establishing the Fisheries Code and its enforcement decree no. 2015-159. These texts make several mentions of the concern of sustainable management of Mauritanian fisheries and fishing resources, as well as of the ecosystems that accommodate these resources.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'False Cod' Epinephelus Aeneus in a Context of Ineffective Management
    African Journal of Marine Science 2012, 34(3): 305–311 Copyright © NISC (Pty) Ltd Printed in South Africa — All rights reserved AFRICAN JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE ISSN 1814-232X EISSN 1814-2338 http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2989/1814232X.2012.725278 Economic dimension of the collapse of the ‘false cod’ Epinephelus aeneus in a context of ineffective management of the small-scale fisheries in Senegal D Thiao 1*, C Chaboud 2, A Samba 3, F Laloë 4 and PM Cury 2 1 Centre de Recherches Océanographiques de Dakar-Thiaroye (CRODT), BP 2241, Dakar, Senegal 2 IRD, UMR EME 212 (Exploited Marine Ecosystems), Centre de Recherche Halieutique Méditerranéenne et Tropicale IRD – IFREMER and Université Montpellier II, Avenue Jean Monnet, BP 171, 34203 Sète Cedex, France 3 Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles, Cité ISRA n°103, BP 03, Dakar RP, Senegal 4 IRD, UMR GRED 220 (Gouvernance, Risque, Environnement Développement), IRD – UPV Montpellier III, 911 avenue Agropolis, BP 64501, 34394 Montpellier Cedex 5, France * Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Small-scale fisheries are often seen as a solution for ensuring sustainability in marine exploitation. They are viewed as a suitable alternative to industrial fisheries, particularly when considering their social and economic importance in developing countries. Here, we show that the booming small-scale fishery sector in Senegal, in the context of increasing foreign demand, has induced the collapse of one of the most emblematic West African marine fish species, a large grouper Epinephelus aeneus , historically called ‘false cod’ by European fishers. The overexploitation of this species appears to be on account of the increasing effort sustained by a growing international demand and important subsidies, which resulted in a relative stability of the average economic yield per fishing trip and an incentive for continuing targeting this species to almost extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • BIO 313 ANIMAL ECOLOGY Corrected
    NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COURSE CODE: BIO 314 COURSE TITLE: ANIMAL ECOLOGY 1 BIO 314: ANIMAL ECOLOGY Team Writers: Dr O.A. Olajuyigbe Department of Biology Adeyemi Colledge of Education, P.M.B. 520, Ondo, Ondo State Nigeria. Miss F.C. Olakolu Nigerian Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research, No 3 Wilmot Point Road, Bar-beach Bus-stop, Victoria Island, Lagos, Nigeria. Mrs H.O. Omogoriola Nigerian Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research, No 3 Wilmot Point Road, Bar-beach Bus-stop, Victoria Island, Lagos, Nigeria. EDITOR: Mrs Ajetomobi School of Agricultural Sciences Lagos State Polytechnic Ikorodu, Lagos 2 BIO 313 COURSE GUIDE Introduction Animal Ecology (313) is a first semester course. It is a two credit unit elective course which all students offering Bachelor of Science (BSc) in Biology can take. Animal ecology is an important area of study for scientists. It is the study of animals and how they related to each other as well as their environment. It can also be defined as the scientific study of interactions that determine the distribution and abundance of organisms. Since this is a course in animal ecology, we will focus on animals, which we will define fairly generally as organisms that can move around during some stages of their life and that must feed on other organisms or their products. There are various forms of animal ecology. This includes: • Behavioral ecology, the study of the behavior of the animals with relation to their environment and others • Population ecology, the study of the effects on the population of these animals • Marine ecology is the scientific study of marine-life habitat, populations, and interactions among organisms and the surrounding environment including their abiotic (non-living physical and chemical factors that affect the ability of organisms to survive and reproduce) and biotic factors (living things or the materials that directly or indirectly affect an organism in its environment).
    [Show full text]
  • 'Saiko' Fishing Is Fuelling the Collapse of Ghana's Fisheries
    STOLEN AT SEA How illegal ‘saiko’ fishing is fuelling the collapse of Ghana’s fisheries A report produced by the Environmental Justice Foundation and Hen Mpoano Stolen at Sea: How illegal ‘saiko’ fishing is fuelling the collapse of Ghana’s fisheries. 1 Citation: EJF and Hen Mpoano (2019). Stolen at sea. How illegal 'saiko' fishing is fuelling the collapse of Ghana's fisheries. A report by: [email protected] [email protected] +233 33 2139 968 +233 31 2020 701 www.ejfoundation.org www.henmpoano.org 2 Out of the shadows. Improving transparency in global fisheries to stop IUU fishing. Contents Executive summary 4 1. Introduction 8 1.1. Illegal saiko fishing 8 2. Aim of study 9 3. Methods 10 3.1. Data collection 10 3.2. Ethics 10 4. Results 14 4.1. Estimate of saiko landings 14 (a) Elmina 14 (b) Apam 16 (c) Axim 17 (d) Total saiko landings (all landing sites) 17 4.2. Estimate of value of the trade 18 (a) Value of saiko fish traded at sea 18 (b) Value of saiko fish sold at the landing site 18 4.3. Change in the saiko trade over time 18 4.4. Composition of saiko catches 19 4.5. Impacts of saiko 20 (a) Artisanal and semi-industrial fishers 20 (b) Processors and traders 21 (c) Saiko workers 21 5. Discussion 22 5.1. The magnitude of the illegal saiko trade 22 5.2. Inequities in Ghana’s marine fisheries sector 23 5.3. Ecological impacts of the saiko trade 24 5.4. Socioeconomic impacts of saiko 28 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Global Assessment of the Status of Exploited Marine Fish and Invertebrate Populations
    A PRELIMINARY GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF THE STATUS OF EXPLOITED MARINE FISH AND INVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS June 30 2018 A PRELIMINARY GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF THE STATUS OF EXPLOITED MARINE FISH AND INVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS Maria. L.D. Palomares, Rainer Froese, Brittany Derrick, Simon-Luc Nöel, Gordon Tsui Jessika Woroniak Daniel Pauly A report prepared by the Sea Around Us for OCEANA June 30, 2018 A PRELIMINARY GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF THE STATUS OF EXPLOITED MARINE FISH AND INVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS Maria L.D. Palomares1, Rainer Froese2, Brittany Derrick1, Simon-Luc Nöel1, Gordon Tsui1, Jessika Woroniak1 and Daniel Pauly1 CITE AS: Palomares MLD, Froese R, Derrick B, Nöel S-L, Tsui G, Woroniak J, Pauly D (2018) A preliminary global assessment of the status of exploited marine fish and invertebrate populations. A report prepared by the Sea Around Us for OCEANA. The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, p. 64. 1 Sea Around Us, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver BC V6T1Z4 Canada 2 Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research GEOMAR, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 2 Material and Methods 3 − Reconstructed catches vs official catches 3 − Marine Ecoregions vs EEZs 3 − The CMSY method 5 Results and Discussion 7 − Stock summaries reports 9 − Problematic stocks and sources of bias 14 − Stocks in the countries where OCEANA operates 22 − Stock assessments on the Sea Around Us website 31 − The next steps 32 Acknowledgements 33 References 34 Appendices I. List of marine ecoregions by EEZ 37 II. Summaries of number of stock by region and 49 by continent III.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduced Marine Species in Croatian Waters (Eastern Adriatic Sea)
    Review Article Mediterranean Marine Science Indexed in WoS (Web of Science, ISI Thomson) and SCOPUS The journal is available on line at http://www.medit-mar-sc.net Introduced marine species in Croatian waters (Eastern Adriatic Sea) M. PEĆAREVIĆ1, J. MIKUŠ1, A. BRATOŠ CETINIĆ1, J. DULČIĆ2 and M. ČALIĆ3 1 University of Dubrovnik, Department of Aquaculture, Ćira Carića 4, 20000 Dubrovnik, Croatia 2 Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Šetalište I. Meštrovića 63, 21000 Split, Croatia 3 University of Dubrovnik, Institute for Marine and Coastal Research, Kneza Damjana Jude 12, 20000 Dubrovnik, Croatia Corresponding author: [email protected] Handling Editor: Argyro Zenetos Received: 24 October 2012; Accepted: 28 February 2013; Published on line: 26 March 2013 Abstract The Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea covers more than 35% of the total Croatian territory, which means that monitoring changes in marine ecosystems and the conservation of biodiversity are of great importance. Following global changes, Croatia is experiencing increasing problems due to the introduction of new species that include aliens (due to aquaculture activities and ship- ping) and species from other Mediterranean subregions that are extending their geographic range. This work provides a checklist of introduced species in Croatian waters. A total of 113 species (15 phytoplankton, 16 zooplankton, 16 macroalgae, 44 zoobenthic and 22 fish species) have been recorded in the eastern part of the Adriatic Sea, of which 61 species are alien and 52 introduced, due to climate change. Keywords: Alien species, range expansion, Croatia, Adriatic Sea, Mediterranean Sea. Introduction Considering all major characteristics, three biogeo- graphic regions can be recognized in the Adriatic Sea: a The Adriatic Sea is an elongated semi-enclosed basin shallow northern sub-basin and a deep southern sub-ba- in the Northeastern Mediterranean Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Birane Samb Small Pelagics West Africa
    1 Case study of small pelagic fish resources in Northwest Africa Note: Some sections of this paper contains summaries from the reports of the FAO working group on the assessment of small pelagic fish off Northwest Africa and the Workshop on the management of shared small pelagic fishery resources in Northwest Africa organised by FAO and the Nansen Programme. Résumé : Les eaux marines de la région nord ouest africaine sont très productives en raison d'un upwelling actif. Le secteur de la pêche joue un rôle prépondérant dans l'économie des différents pays. En dépit de leur faible valeur marchande, les poissons pélagiques côtiers sont les espèces dominantes dans les captures et constituent les ressources les plus abondantes et les mieux partagées. Leur exploitation concerne aussi bien le secteur industriel que le secteur artisanal. Ces espèces font l’objet d’évaluations régulières et les mesures d’aménagement préconisées indiquent un suivi strict de l’effort dans les pêcheries de chinchards et de maquereaux. Un taux de capture à ne pas dépasser a été défini pour les sardinelles. Les influences respectives de la pêche et des fluctuations de l'environnement sur l'abondance de ces stocks ne sont pas bien comprises. En effet, l'abondance des stocks pélagiques reste tributaire des conditions hydroclimatiques et ces stocks nécessitent par conséquent une gestion qui tienne compte de leur instabilité. Les pays consentent actuellement un effort dans le sens de mieux réglementer la pêcherie. Mais faute de moyens et de coopération plus poussée, le respect des mesures édictées ne donne pas encore pleine satisfaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Fao Working Group on the Assessment of Small Pelagic Fish Off Northwest Africa
    FAO Fisheries Report No. 785 FAO, Rapport sur les pêches no 785 FIRM/R785 (Bi) ISSN 0429-9337 Report of the FAO WORKING GROUP ON THE ASSESSMENT OF SMALL PELAGIC FISH OFF NORTHWEST AFRICA Nouadhibou, Mauritania, 26 April–5 May 2005 Rapport du GROUPE DE TRAVAIL DE LA FAO SUR L’ÉVALUATION DES PETITS PÉLAGIQUES AU LARGE DE L’AFRIQUE NORD-OCCIDENTALE Nouadhibou, Mauritanie, 26 avril-5 mai 2005 Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: Sales and Marketing Group Information Division FAO Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00153 Rome, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (+39) 06 57053360 Les commandes de publications de la FAO peuvent être adressées au: Groupe des ventes et de la commercialisation Division de l’information FAO Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00153 Rome, Italie Courriel: [email protected] Télécopie: (+39) 06 57053360 FAO Fisheries Report No. 785 FAO, Rapport sur les pêches no 785 FIRM/R785 (Bi) Report of the FAO WORKING GROUP ON THE ASSESSMENT OF SMALL PELAGIC FISH OFF NORTHWEST AFRICA Nouadhibou, Mauritania, 26 April–5 May 2005 Rapport du GROUPE DE TRAVAIL DE LA FAO SUR L’ÉVALUATION DES PETITS PÉLAGIQUES AU LARGE DE L’AFRIQUE NORD-OCCIDENTALE Nouadhibou, Mauritanie, 26 avril-5 mai 2005 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L’ALIMENTATION ET L’AGRICULTURE Rome, 2006 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • ILLEGAL FISHING Which Fish Species Are at Highest Risk from Illegal and Unreported Fishing?
    ILLEGAL FISHING Which fish species are at highest risk from illegal and unreported fishing? October 2015 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 4 METHODOLOGY 5 OVERALL FINDINGS 9 NOTES ON ESTIMATES OF IUU FISHING 13 Tunas 13 Sharks 14 The Mediterranean 14 US Imports 15 CONCLUSION 16 CITATIONS 17 OCEAN BASIN PROFILES APPENDIX 1: IUU Estimates for Species Groups and Ocean Regions APPENDIX 2: Estimates of IUU Risk for FAO Assessed Stocks APPENDIX 3: FAO Ocean Area Boundary Descriptions APPENDIX 4: 2014 U.S. Edible Imports of Wild-Caught Products APPENDIX 5: Overexploited Stocks Categorized as High Risk – U.S. Imported Products Possibly Derived from Stocks EXECUTIVE SUMMARY New analysis by World Wildlife Fund (WWF) finds that over 85 percent of global fish stocks can be considered at significant risk of Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) fishing. This evaluation is based on the most recent comprehensive estimates of IUU fishing and includes the worlds’ major commercial stocks or species groups, such as all those that are regularly assessed by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Based on WWF’s findings, the majority of the stocks, 54 percent, are categorized as at high risk of IUU, with an additional 32 perent judged to be at moderate risk. Of the 567 stocks that were assessed, the findings show that 485 stocks fall into these two categories. More than half of the world’s most overexploited stocks are at the highest risk of IUU fishing. Examining IUU risk by location, the WWF analysis shows that in more than one-third of the world’s ocean basins as designated by the FAO, all of these stocks were at high or moderate risk of IUU fishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Ices Wgitmo Report 2013
    ICES WGITMO REPORT 2013 ICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE ICES CM 2013/ACOM:30 Report of the ICES Working Group on Introduc- tion and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO) 20 - 22 March 2013 Montreal, Canada International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2013. Report of the ICES Working Group on Introduction and Transfers of Ma- rine Organisms (WGITMO), 20 - 22 March 2013, Montreal, Canada. ICES CM 2013/ACOM:30. 149 pp. For permission to reproduce material from this publication, please apply to the Gen- eral Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2013 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES WGITMO REPORT 2013 i Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................ 1 1 Opening of the meeting ................................................................................................ 2 2 Adoption of the agenda ................................................................................................ 2 3 WGITMO Terms of Reference .................................................................................... 2 4 Progress in relation
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Species Transshipped at Sea (Saiko Sh) in Ghana with a Note On
    Fish species transshipped at sea (Saiko ƒsh) in Ghana with a note on implications for marine conservation Denis Worlanyo Aheto ( [email protected] ) Centre for Coastal Management - Africa Centre of Excellence in Coastal Resilience (ACECoR), University of Cape Coast, Ghana https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5722-1363 Isaac Okyere ( [email protected] ) Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Ghana https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8725-1555 Noble Kwame Asare Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Ghana Jennifer Eshilley Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Ghana Justice Odoiquaye Odoi Nature Today, A25 Standards Estates, Sakumono, Tema, Ghana Research Article Keywords: Fish transshipment, saiko, IUU ƒshing, Marine Conservation, Sustainability, Ghana DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-41329/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/18 Abstract Increasing global seafood demand over the last couple of decades has resulted in overexploitation of certain ƒsh species by both industrial and small-scale artisanal ƒshers. This phenomenon has threatened the livelihoods and food security of small-scale ƒshing communities especially in the West African sub- region. In Ghana, ƒsh transshipment (locally referred to as saiko) has been catalogued as one more negative practice that is exacerbating an already dire situation. The goal of this study was to characterise transshipped ƒsh species landed in Ghana on the basis of composition, habitat of origin, maturity and conservation status on the IUCN list of threatened species to enhance understanding of the ecological implications of the practice and inform regulatory enforcement and policy formulation.
    [Show full text]
  • ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List February 2007 Sorted on Scientific Name
    ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List Sorted on Scientific Name February 2007 Scientific name English Name French name Spanish Name Code Abalistes stellaris (Bloch & Schneider 1801) Starry triggerfish AJS Abbottina rivularis (Basilewsky 1855) Chinese false gudgeon ABB Ablabys binotatus (Peters 1855) Redskinfish ABW Ablennes hians (Valenciennes 1846) Flat needlefish Orphie plate Agujón sable BAF Aborichthys elongatus Hora 1921 ABE Abralia andamanika Goodrich 1898 BLK Abralia veranyi (Rüppell 1844) Verany's enope squid Encornet de Verany Enoploluria de Verany BLJ Abraliopsis pfefferi (Verany 1837) Pfeffer's enope squid Encornet de Pfeffer Enoploluria de Pfeffer BJF Abramis brama (Linnaeus 1758) Freshwater bream Brème d'eau douce Brema común FBM Abramis spp Freshwater breams nei Brèmes d'eau douce nca Bremas nep FBR Abramites eques (Steindachner 1878) ABQ Abudefduf luridus (Cuvier 1830) Canary damsel AUU Abudefduf saxatilis (Linnaeus 1758) Sergeant-major ABU Abyssobrotula galatheae Nielsen 1977 OAG Abyssocottus elochini Taliev 1955 AEZ Abythites lepidogenys (Smith & Radcliffe 1913) AHD Acanella spp Branched bamboo coral KQL Acanthacaris caeca (A. Milne Edwards 1881) Atlantic deep-sea lobster Langoustine arganelle Cigala de fondo NTK Acanthacaris tenuimana Bate 1888 Prickly deep-sea lobster Langoustine spinuleuse Cigala raspa NHI Acanthalburnus microlepis (De Filippi 1861) Blackbrow bleak AHL Acanthaphritis barbata (Okamura & Kishida 1963) NHT Acantharchus pomotis (Baird 1855) Mud sunfish AKP Acanthaxius caespitosa (Squires 1979) Deepwater mud lobster Langouste
    [Show full text]