DOCSLIB.ORG

Engineers in WWII 1944

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Engineers in WWII 1944 Number 1, May 1994 Engineers in World War II — 1944 January 4 The attack on Mount Porchia, Italy, by the 6th Armored Division — began at 1930, and by daylight the division had been pushed back to its starting point. The 1108th Engineer Combat Group of Colonel K. S. Andersson, composed of the 48th Engineer Combat Battalion (ECB) commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Andrew J. Goodpaster and the 235th Engineer Combat Battalion commanded by Major Frank Polish, were ordered in as infantry. After several days of heavy fighting, the engineers took and held Mount Porchia. Both units received heavy casualties. Colonel Goodpaster was severely wounded and evacuated. Sergeant Joseph C. Specker, Co C, 48th ECB, received the Medal of Honor posthumously for his actions in wiping out snipers. Both units received the Presidential Unit Citation. February The 1875th Engineer Aviation Battalion landed at Bombay, India, 13 — and moved to Dudhkundi where it began to convert the old Royal Air Force field to B-29 superfortress standards. On 20 June 1944, a B-29 pilot landed on the new runway at Dudhkundi by mistake, thus establishing the runway as operational and ready for launching long-range bombers into the Japanese homeland. May 17 — Japanese forces blocked construction of the Ledo Road at Myitkyina, Burma. A detachment of Company A. 879th Airborne Engineer Battalion, with equipment, began landing at Myitkyinaair strip in gliders and continued to land during the night. Work began rapidly on the airstrip with the unit providing its own defense against Japanese attacks until the strip was finished. May 18 — While under hostile fire, 25 landing craft manned by Company A, 542d Engineer Boat and Shore Regiment, landed a reinforced battalion of the 163d Infantry, 41st Infantry Division, on Wadke Island. The infantry soldiers flattened themselves on the bottoms of the boats for protection behind armored plates, but the engineer crews, lacking this shielding, took many hits. As soon as one engineer went down, another took his place. In recognition of its work, Co. A, 542d Boat and Shore Regiment, received the Presidential Unit Citation. May 26 — Japanese attacks seriously threatened the Myitkyina Airstrip in Burma, leading General Stillwell to send the 209th and 236th Engineer Combat Battalions forward as infantry. Fighting continued for two months before the Japanese retreated. Twenty- eight officers and enlisted men from the two engineer units were killed in action, and another 335 were wounded. Both units received the Presidential Unit Citation. June 6 — The U.S. Army's V Corps landed on OMAHA Beach, Normandy, supported by Brigadier General William M. Hoge's Provisional Engineer Special Brigade Group, consisting of the 5th and 6th Special Brigades and the 11th Port Headquarters. On UTAH Beach the 1st Engineer Special Brigade supported VII Corps. Colonel Paul Thompson, 6th Brigade commander, was seriously wounded twice and evacuated on D-Day. From D-Day until D+100, more than 1,000,000 tons of supplies, 100,000 vehicles, and 600,000 men poured over OMAHA Beach. During this same period 93,000 casualties were evacuated. During the assault phase on OMAHA Beach, special engineer assault gapping teams came ashore with the infantry and opened gaps 50 yards wide in the barbed wire and obstacles lined the shore. Support teams followed to widen the gaps. Slowly, against stiff German opposition, the engineers on OMAHA Beach began opening the exits. At Exit E-l, mines, barbed wire, obstacles, antitank ditches, and impassable gravel and sand, barred the tanks from moving until Private Vinton Dove, a bulldozer operator from Company C, 37th Engineer Combat Battalion, and his relief operator, Private William J. Shoemaker, cleared a road through the shingle, removed the roadblock at E-l, and filled the antitank ditch, opening a path for the Sherman tanks. For their actions both men were awarded the Distinguished Service Cross. June 26 — The Germans surrendered Cherbourg on D+20, and the next day 18 engineer units, led by the 1056th Engineer Group, began reconstruction of Cherbourg. By 1 November, when the group was ordered to the Albert Canal area, engineers had completed facilities for unloading 25,000 tons a day, well over the planned figure of 7,900 tons a day. July 21 — On Guam, the 77th Infantry Division, supported by the 302d Engineer Combat Battalion, began landing in the early afternoon, unopposed because of naval bombardment. The main job of the engineers was to keep the supply roads open. In hand-to-hand fighting that night, 18 Japanese and 3 engineers were killed when the enemy attempted to penetrate the perimeter. August 19 In southern France, the 343d Engineer General Service Regiment — restored rail service to Aix in 10 days, repairing a 104-foot gap in the rail bridge by using a German 270-mm railway gun. The 343d stripped the gun and the rail trucks, attached a 10-foot steel extension, and launched the platform as the stringers for the new span across the gap. August 25 The 603d Engineer Camouflage Battalion, one of four such — battalions that formed a group called the 23d Headquarters Special Troops, took part in Operation BREST, near Brest, France, augmenting real units already in place with dummies, spoof radio installations, and a variety of misleading special effects. On three successive nights men of the 23d approached within 500 yards of the enemy lines and projected their amplified recordings of tanks approaching, taking up positions, and withdrawing. Engines roared; gears clashed and ground. Voices shouted in the dark. The dummy flash batteries drew repeated counterfire. The German commander later testified he had been taken in by the deception. October 2 D-Day for the XIX Corps' attack on the Siegfried Line began with an — air strike preceding an 1100 jump-off. The 105th Engineer Combat Battalion, 30th Infantry Division, and the 24th Engineer Combat Battalion, 1104th Engineer Combat Group, went forward under fire, assaulting pillboxes and constructing treadway bridges. By 7 October, XIX Corps had breached the West Wall in its sector. October 20 The Sixth Army assaulted Leyte, Philippines, with the 2d Engineer — Special Brigade supporting the X Corps landings. In the XXIV Corps area, engineers unloaded all ships of the initial assault force within the first 44 hours of landing. November Engineers of the 20th Engineer Combat Battalion were assigned to 4 — develop a trail in the Kall River gorge, Huertgen Forest area, Germany, into a main supply road. The Germans launched an attack that drove the infantry back in disorder. The 146th Engineer Combat Battalion rushed into Vossenack, and the 1340th and Company A, 20th Engineer Combat Battalion, were committed as infantry to hold the Kall River bridge. The engineers drove off the enemy and secured the bridge during a week-long battle. December When Germany launched its offensive from the Eifel region against 16 — the First United States Army lines in the Ardennes section of Belgium and Luxemburg, it marked the beginning of the Battle of the Bulge. It also set the stage for the development of the largest continuous minefield ever laid on any American division front. The 1st Engineer Combat Battalion planned and installed this extensive 12-mile minefield of 31,480 antitank mines, 127 anti- personnel mines, and 38 trip flares in 2 weeks beginning on 20 December. The minefield aided the 1st Infantry Division in firmly repelling three of Von Rundstedt's best divisions, thereby preventing a successful breakthrough in the Monschau shoulder. December The 158th Engineer Combat Battalion, under Lieutenant Colonel 17 — Sam Tabet, was assigned to protect VIII Corps headquarters at Bastogne until the 101st Airborne Division arrived. Engineers constructed and manned a line of roadblocks, hasty minefields, and dug-in positions. They stretched chains of antitank mines across the roads and covered these obstacles with rifles, machine guns, and bazookas. Elements of an armored division were forced back leaving the 158th Engineer Combat Battalion and a company of the 35th Engineer Combat Battalion as the only force in front of Bastogne. By afternoon, 19 December, the engineers had held the line long enough for the 101st to move up and relieve them. December Lieutenant Colonel Dave Pergrin, 291st Engineer Combat Battalion, 17 — sent a squad of his engineers equipped with 20 mines and 1 bazooka to set up a roadblock at Stavelot, Belgium. At 1900, three Mark IV tanks came toward the bridge. The first tank struck a mine that blew off its treads; the others withdrew. December Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Riggs, 81st Engineer Combat Battalion, 17 — received orders from the l06th Infantry Division to establish a line east of St. Vith and hold off the Germans. He rounded up all available men of the 81st and 168th Engineer Combat Battalions and managed to hold off the Germans until 21 December when they broke up into small groups and attempted to make their way back to St. Vith. Colonel Riggs was captured, but he escaped in Poland and fought with the Russians until he returned to his unit in April 1945. December The Army map depot at Stavelot, Belgium, was abandoned during 18 — the German counteroffensive in the Ardennes. All depot records were removed, but none of the map stocks were removed or destroyed. Upon recapture of the depot, engineers found that few map stocks had been taken or destroyed. December The 1111th Engineer Combat Group ordered Company C, 51st 18 — Engineer Combat Battalion, to Trois Ponts to defend the town from German attack. Under the leadership of Major "Bull" Yates, the battalion executive officer, they defended against German tanks until relieved by the 505th Parachute Infantry Regiment. The airborne troops took up positions across the river, but were surrounded.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Law and Military Operations in Kosovo: 1999-2001, Lessons Learned For
    LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS IN KOSOVO: 1999-2001 LESSONS LEARNED FOR JUDGE ADVOCATES Center for Law and Military Operations (CLAMO) The Judge Advocate General’s School United States Army Charlottesville, Virginia CENTER FOR LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS (CLAMO) Director COL David E. Graham Deputy Director LTC Stuart W. Risch Director, Domestic Operational Law (vacant) Director, Training & Support CPT Alton L. (Larry) Gwaltney, III Marine Representative Maj Cody M. Weston, USMC Advanced Operational Law Studies Fellows MAJ Keith E. Puls MAJ Daniel G. Jordan Automation Technician Mr. Ben R. Morgan Training Centers LTC Richard M. Whitaker Battle Command Training Program LTC James W. Herring Battle Command Training Program MAJ Phillip W. Jussell Battle Command Training Program CPT Michael L. Roberts Combat Maneuver Training Center MAJ Michael P. Ryan Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Peter R. Hayden Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Mark D. Matthews Joint Readiness Training Center SFC Michael A. Pascua Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Jonathan Howard National Training Center CPT Charles J. Kovats National Training Center Contact the Center The Center’s mission is to examine legal issues that arise during all phases of military operations and to devise training and resource strategies for addressing those issues. It seeks to fulfill this mission in five ways. First, it is the central repository within The Judge Advocate General's Corps for all-source data, information, memoranda, after-action materials and lessons learned pertaining to legal support to operations, foreign and domestic. Second, it supports judge advocates by analyzing all data and information, developing lessons learned across all military legal disciplines, and by disseminating these lessons learned and other operational information to the Army, Marine Corps, and Joint communities through publications, instruction, training, and databases accessible to operational forces, world-wide.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Press January 2017 Blythe
    Pfc. Brandie Leon, 4th Infantry Division, holds security while on patrol in a local neighborhood to help maintain peace after recent attacks on mosques in the area, East Baghdad, Iraq, 3 March 2006. (Photo by Staff Sgt. Jason Ragucci, U.S. Army) III Corps during the Surge: A Study in Operational Art Maj. Wilson C. Blythe Jr., U.S. Army he role of Lt. Gen. Raymond Odierno’s III (MNF–I) while using tactical actions within Iraq in an Corps as Multinational Corps–Iraq (MNC–I) illustrative manner. As a result, the campaign waged by has failed to receive sufficient attention from III Corps, the operational headquarters, is overlooked Tstudies of the 2007 surge in Iraq. By far the most in this key work. comprehensive account of the 2007–2008 campaign The III Corps campaign is also neglected in other is found in Michael Gordon and Lt. Gen. Bernard prominent works on the topic. In The Gamble: General Trainor’s The Endgame: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Petraeus and the American Military Adventure in Iraq, Iraq, from George W. Bush to Barack Obama, which fo- 2006-2008, Thomas Ricks emphasizes the same levels cuses on the formulation and execution of strategy and as Gordon and Trainor. However, while Ricks plac- policy.1 It frequently moves between Washington D.C., es a greater emphasis on the role of III Corps than is U.S Central Command, and Multinational Force–Iraq found in other accounts, he fails to offer a thorough 2 13 January 2017 Army Press Online Journal 17-1 III Corps during the Surge examination of the operational campaign waged by III creating room for political progress such as the February 2 Corps.
    [Show full text]
  • US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (Excerpt)
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified December 16, 1982 East German Ministry of State Security, 'US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (excerpt) Citation: “East German Ministry of State Security, 'US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (excerpt),” December 16, 1982, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, BStU, Berlin, ZA, HVA, 19, pp. 126-359. Translated from German by Bernd Schaefer; available in original language at the Parallel History Project. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/112680 Summary: The Stasi's own preface to the V Corps/U.S. Army 1981 war plan (which recognizes that NATO's concept was defensive in nature in contrast to Warsaw Pact plans, which until 1987 indeed envisioned the mentioned "breakthrough towards the Rhine") Original Language: German Contents: English Translation MINISTRY FOR STATE SECURITY Top Secret! Berlin, 16. Dec 1982 Only for personal use! Nr. 626/82 Return is requested! Expl. 5. Bl. MY Information about Military planning of the USA and NATO for the operation of the V. Army Corps/USA in times of tension and in war Part 1 Preliminary Remarks Through reliable intelligence we received portions of the US and NATO military crisis and wartime planning for the deployment of the V Corps/USA stationed in the FRG. This intelligence concerns the secret Operations Plan 33001 (GDP – General Defense Plan) for the V Corps/USA in Europe. The plan is endorsed by the US Department of the Army and, after consultation with NATO, became part of NATO planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Disjointed War: Military Operations in Kosovo, 1999
    Disjointed War Military Operations in Kosovo, 1999 Bruce R. Nardulli, Walter L. Perry, Bruce Pirnie John Gordon IV, John G. McGinn Prepared for the United States Army Approved for public release; distribution unlimited R Arroyo Center The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Army under contract number DASW01-01-C-0003. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Disjointed war : military operations in Kosovo, 1999 / Bruce R. Nardulli ... [et al.]. p. cm. “MR-1406.” Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-8330-3096-5 1. Kosovo (Serbia)—History—Civil War, 1998—Campaigns. 2. North Atlantic Treaty Organization—Armed Forces—Yugoslavia. I. Nardulli, Bruce R. DR2087.5 .D57 2002 949.703—dc21 2002024817 Cover photos courtesy of U.S. Air Force Link (B2) at www.af.mil, and NATO Media Library (Round table Meeting) at www.nato.int. RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. Cover design by Stephen Bloodsworth © Copyright 2002 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from RAND. Published 2002 by RAND 1700 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 201 North Craig Street, Suite 102, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org/ To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] PREFACE Following the 1999 Kosovo conflict, the Army asked RAND Arroyo Center to prepare an authoritative and detailed account of military operations with a focus on ground operations, especially Task Force Hawk.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1990S: Trouble in the Balkans 117
    The 1990s: Trouble in the Balkans 117 Chapter Five The 1990s: Trouble in the Balkans A CHANGING WORLD The end of the Cold War brought profound changes to international relations. During the Cold War, both the Soviets and the West had supported client states around the globe, sometimes suppressing internal dissent in those countries to prop up friendly regimes. Now that the Cold War’s strategic rationales had dwindled away, dissent could reappear, sometimes turning into conflict. Coun- tries and alliances either adapted to the changed situation or disappeared. The US Army was also facing major changes, most notably, a substantial re- duction in size. With fewer threats on the horizon, neither the public nor poli- ticians were willing to spend as much money on the military. The American public expected a “peace dividend” of lower defense spending, and the political question shifted from whether candidates were hawkish about defense to how they would spend the “dividend.” Some favored spending the money on various programs, others preferred tax cuts. Meanwhile, the active duty Army fell by 32%, from 772,000 to 529,000. A less obvious change for the Army was a shift in the locations where it might see combat. Since Vietnam, the Army’s major emphasis had been preparing to fight a Soviet/Warsaw Pact attack in Europe. Now that the Soviet threat was over and an invasion of Germany unlikely, major reductions of American forces in Europe, especially in Germany, were planned. Remaining troops had to be ready to deploy elsewhere, wherever the trouble was. Germany would be a starting point, not the scene of action.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainment of Army Forces in Operation Iraqi Freedom
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as CHILD POLICY a public service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION Jump down to document ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research NATIONAL SECURITY organization providing objective analysis and POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY effective solutions that address the challenges facing SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY the public and private sectors around the world. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND Support RAND INFRASTRUCTURE Purchase this document WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Arroyo Center View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Sustainment of Army Forces in Operation Iraqi Freedom Battlefield Logistics and Effects on Operations Eric Peltz, John M. Halliday, Marc L. Robbins, Kenneth J. Girardini Prepared for the United States Army Approved for public release; distribution unlimited The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Army under Contract No.
    [Show full text]
  • V Corps Inactivates After Nearly a Century of Service to U.S. Army
    V Corps inactivates after nearly a century of service to U.S. Army June 12, 2013 By Sgt. Daniel Cole, U.S. Army Europe Public Affairs Tweet . V Corps commander Lt. Gen. James L. Terry (left) and corps Command Sgt. Maj. William Johnson place a Meritorious Unit Commendation streamer on the corps colors during the unit's inactivation ceremony at Schloss Biebrich in Wiesbaden, Germany, June 12. (Photo by Karl Weisel) RELATED ITEMS: Social Media - More images in U.S. Army Garrison Wiesbaden's Flickr photostream Facebook WIESBADEN, Germany –- V Corps marked its inactivation after nearly a century of prestigious service to the U.S. Army with a ceremony at Wiesbaden’s Schloss Biebrich, Twitter June 12. Flickr The ceremony served to inactivate V Corps and to give a final salute to the unit for YouTube everything it has accomplished in its 95-year history. It was also a time to present two campaign steamers to the corps for its service. A Meritorious Unit Commendation streamer was presented for the unit’s most recent deployment serving as the of NATO’s International Security Assistance Force Joint Command (IJC) in Afghanistan. The second streamer, the Superior Army Unit Award, honors the unit for its efforts during the reconstitution, modularization and relocation of V Corps to Wiesbaden from Heidelberg. During the ceremony V Corps commander Lt. Gen. James L. Terry and corps Command Sgt. Maj. William Johnson placed the streamers on the unit’s colors and cased the banner for inactivation. Terry spoke about how the corps has provided USAREUR and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • V Corps Public Affairs News Release
    V Corps Public Affairs News Release For more information, contact: Maj. Rich Spiegel/Hilde Patton DSN 314.370.5812/16 Civ. 49(0)6221.57.5812/16 Email: Richard [email protected] Email: [email protected] For Immediate Release: V Corps Commander nominated for Pentagon position Heidelberg, Germany (July 26, 2007) -- Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates announced yesterday that the President has nominated Lt. Gen. James D. Thurman, commander of V Corps here, to become the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-3/5/7, U.S. Army, Washington, D.C. The nomination has to be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. General Thurman has been commander of V Corps since January this year. V Corps serves the U.S. European Command and is the United States Army's only forward-deployed corps headquarters. With more than 25,000 soldiers and civilians, V Corps is the Army's contingency force for European and Central Command missions and stands ready to deploy from its bases in Europe to Central and Eastern Europe, the Mediterranean, Africa, the Middle East and the Persian Gulf. During his command, Thurman used his experience gained during command in Iraq to improve readiness and training of deploying units. He was also instrumental in starting the transformation of the current military structures to create an operational corps-level joint deployable headquarters. If confirmed by the Senate, Thurman will be leaving Germany to head the Army G-3/5/7 which has the Army General Staff responsibility for strategy formulation, overall force development, individual and unit training policy, the functional aspects of strategic and tactical command and control systems, nuclear and chemical matters, and establishing requirements and priorities for the employment and sustenance of Army forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resource Survey of Cold War Properties Fort Bragg, North Carolina
    CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY OF COLD WAR PROPERTIES FORT BRAGG, NORTH CAROLINA AUGUST, 2005 Report Prepared By Thomason and Associates Preservation Planners P.O. Box 121225 Nashville, TN 37212 Tel and Fax: 615-385-4960 e-mail: [email protected] Report Prepared For the US Corps of Engineers, Savannah, Georgia and the Cultural Resources Management Program, Fort Bragg, North Carolina Principal Investigator, Philip Thomason ──────────────────────── TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures....................................................................................................................................... iii Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. iv I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 II. The Cold War Context of Fort Bragg ...................................................................................... 8 III. The Cold War and National Register Eligibility ................................................................... 36 IV. Fort Bragg’s Cold War-Era National Register Eligible Properties ....................................... 48 V. Summary ................................................................................................................................. 66 VI. Bibliography ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • W(H)Iter Corps?
    W(H)ITHER CORPS? D. Robert Worley August 2001 ***** The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. This report is cleared for public release; distribution is unlimited. ***** Comments pertaining to this report are invited and should be forwarded to: Director, Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 122 Forbes Ave., Carlisle, PA 17013-5244. Copies of this report may be obtained from the Publications Office by calling commercial (717) 245-4133, FAX (717) 245-3820, or via the Internet at [email protected] ***** Most 1993, 1994, and all later Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) monographs are available on the SSI Homepage for electronic dissemination. SSI’s Homepage address is: http://carlisle-www.army. mil/usassi/welcome.htm ***** The Strategic Studies Institute publishes a monthly e-mail newsletter to update the national security community on the research of our analysts, recent and forthcoming publications, and upcoming conferences sponsored by the Institute. Each newsletter also provides a strategic commentary by one of our research analysts. If you are interested in receiving this newsletter, please let us know by e-mail at [email protected] or by calling (717) 245-3133. ISBN 1-58487-061-3 ii FOREWORD In a March 2001 address to the Association of the United States Army, General Eric Shinseki noted, “We are once again an army between the wars, and once again, we are challenged to adjust to break old paradigms.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Military Presence in Poland
    Updated August 4, 2020 U.S. Military Presence in Poland Introduction The U.S.-led NATO Enhanced Forward Presence Battle Poland has been a major focus of U.S. and NATO efforts to Group stationed in Orzysz, Poland, includes an 857-soldier deter potential Russian aggression in Europe. This is due in Armored Cavalry Squadron from the Vilseck, Germany- part to its geographic location on NATO’s eastern flank, based U.S. Army 2nd Cavalry Regiment. On July 29, 2020, providing land access to the Baltic States. Although the Department of Defense announced that the 2nd Cavalry Ukraine is not a NATO ally, the Russian occupation of Regiment would be returning to the United States from Ukraine’s Crimea region in 2014 and subsequent initiation Germany at an unspecified future date. of a separatist war in eastern Ukraine underscored to many observers that NATO allies, particularly those in Eastern U.S.-Poland Joint Declaration Europe, could once again be threatened by Moscow. In On June 12, 2019, the United States and Poland signed a response, the United States and its NATO allies have Joint Declaration on Defense Cooperation Regarding undertaken a number of initiatives to emphasize NATO’s United States Force Posture in the Republic of Poland. The collective defense agreements, thereby assuring allies of declaration proposed adding an additional 1,000 U.S. their own security while simultaneously deterring Russian rotational military personnel and establishing the following: aggression. Poland is a critical partner in these efforts. an Army Division Headquarters (Forward). This could The United States has bolstered security in Central and build on the existing Mission Command Element by Eastern Europe with an increased rotational military adding staff and command, control, communications, presence, additional exercises and training with allies and and intelligence, and planning capabilities; partners, improved infrastructure to allow greater responsiveness, enhanced prepositioning of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • FPCD-82-59 Problems in Implementing the Army's
    UNITEDSTATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548 momAL MRWNNU mu0 COMPENSATION DIVISION B-208816 SEPTEMBER 22,lOSZ The Honorable John O..Marsh, Jr. The Secretary of the Army Attention: The Inspector General DAIG-AI 119652 Dear Mr. Secretary: Subject: Problems in Implementing the Army's CAPSTONE Program to Provide All Reserve Components With a Wartime Mission (GAO/FPCD-82-59) The Army's CAPSTONEprogram is designed to align all Army Reserve component units --Army National Guard and Army Reserves-- under gaining-commands (those commands which will employ Reserve units in wartime) and provide units with detailed information concerning their wartime mission. This information is to be used to improve wartime planning and ongoing training for Reserve component units. However, implementation of CAPSTONE is behind schedule, and some units have not received information that could affect the type of training that is conducted. At the outset, CAPSTONE concentrated on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization-Warsaw Pact scenario and was later expanded to cover the Rapid Deployment Force Army and Korean scenarios. War plans and standing operating procedures are to be developed initially by the gaining-commands and provided to appropriate, aligned Reserve units so that such units can develop complemen- tary war plans and related training requirements. Although the Army has taken steps recently to improve CAPSTONE management, the present management system does not provide the authorities in Europe and the Continental United States with the information needed to properly manage the program and to deter- mine whether implementation is progressing satisfactorily. The present system has obscured the fact that many units had not been contacted by their gaining-commands, and some units had not re- ceived the required training and planning guidance.
    [Show full text]