Agriculture Prospects Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Agriculture Prospects Report داﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎن اﺳــــــــــﻼﻣﯽ ﺟﻤﻬﻮرﻳﺖ دﮐﺮهﻨﯽ ، اوﺑﻮﻟﮕﻮﻟﻮ او ﻣﺎﻟﺪارﯼ وزارت ﺟﻤﻬﻮرﯼ اﺳــــــــــــﻼﻣﯽ اﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎن وزارت زراﻋــﺖ ،ﺁﺑﻴـﺎرﯼ و ﻣﺎﻟـــــﺪارﯼ Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock AGRICULTURE PROSPECTS REPORT Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock General Department of Policy and Planning Statistics and Marketing Information Office Kabul, 26 May 2010 Abbreviations APR Agriculture Prospects Report DAP Diammonium Phosphate EU European Union FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FMD Foot and Mouth Disease MAIL Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock PPR peste des petits ruminants USDA United States Department of Agriculture USGS United States Geological Survey WFP World Food Program Acknowledgement Main sources of updated data in this report are over 4,000 farmers, provincial agricultural offices of 34 provinces, and the technical departments of MAIL. Many thanks are due to farmers, projects, agencies and individuals for their help. MAIL appreciates contributions made by them in providing real time information and data. Thanks are also due to many others who contributed towards field work and/or helped with the writing of this report. Cover photo: Improved Irrigated Wheat in Laghman Province District, Qarghaee. Photo by: Tahir Yadgari, MAIL Counterpart staff “Strengthening Agricultural Economics, Market Information and Statistics Services” (GCP/AFG/063/EC) The EU-funded project mentioned above provided technical guidance and financial support for the production of this report. Price bulletins and other reports produced by the project are available at: http://www.mail.gov.af/m/english/English.htm http://www.fao.org/world/afghanistan/agteo_en.htm Afghanistan Cereal Production (2000-2010) 6,500 6,000 5,500 5,000 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 Production2,000 ('000 tonnes) 1,500 1,000 500 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 YEAR 2007 Wheat 2008 Milled Rice 2009 2010 Maize Barley het2flne2in2PHIH feheurrex tetex u xh eure fevur peef es2 v ewexqex feqrvex ext2ri x sex fehqrs eex uese u xe fewex veqrwex uef v eheu xexqere rse vyqe qry hes2u xhs eue qrexs ury qex peer ef v eusue vegend rsvwexh uexhere urplus2SHDHHH2tonnes2or2more xswy urplus2from2PSDHHH2to2SHDHHH2tonnes urplus2up2to2PSDHHH2tonnes hefiit2up2to2PSDHHH2tonnes hefiit2from2PSDHHH2to2SHDHHH2tonnes hefiit2SHDHHH2tonnes2or2more CONTENTS Map 1: Afghanistan Cereal Production (2000-2010) Map 2: Wheat Balance by Province in 2010 (Preliminary estimates) 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................1 2. WEATHER AND CROP CONDITION.........................................................................2 A. WEATHER DATA .............................................................................................................2 B. GROUND TRUTH DATA....................................................................................................2 3. CEREAL AREA, PRODUCTION, REQUIREMENT AND DEFICIT......................2 4. ADVERSE FACTORS.....................................................................................................4 5. PRICE OF AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES........................................................5 6. REMARKS AND CAVEAT ............................................................................................6 Tables 1: Forecasted Area and Production of different Cereals in 2010 2. Percent changes in the 2010 wheat area, yield and production compared to 2009 3: Cereal production in Afghanistan (2003-2010) (‘000 tonnes) 4: The 2010 Cereal Balance Sheet (‘000 tonnes) 5: Consumer Price Index in April 2010 Annex 1 Rainfall amount (mm) in the current season compared to the Long-Term Average (LTA) 2 Wheat seed produced by the FAO seed project (2003-2009) 3 Area and Production of wheat in 2010 by province (preliminary estimates) 4 Wheat Balance in 2010 by province (preliminary estimates) 5 Production and requirements of various cereals in 2010 6a Adverse conditions of crops 6b Adverse conditions of livestock 6c District codes used in Annex 6a and Annex 6b 7 Progress under plant protection 8 Normalized Difference Vegetation Index in 21-30 April of 2010 compared to average 9. Agricultural prices Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock General Department of Policy and Planning Statistics and Marketing Information Office Agriculture Prospects Report (APR) 1. Introduction Crop assessment missions to 34 provinces were commissioned by MAIL in April and May. MAIL at Kabul fielded crop assessment missions to the following 24 provinces: • North Faryab, Juzjan, Sar-i-Pul, Balkh, Samangan (5 provinces) • North-East Bughlan, Kunduz, Takhar, and Badakhshan (4 provinces) • West Herat and Badghis (2 provinces) • West Central Bamyan (1 province) • Central Kabul, Parwan, Panjsher, Kapisa, Logar and Wardak (6 provinces) • South Paktya and Khost (2 provinces) • East Nangarhar, Laghman, and Kunarha (3 provinces) • South-West Daikunde (1 province) In addition, with the help of Provincial Offices of MAIL (DAIL) and Regional Field Assistants (RFA) of FAO posted in Kunduz, Herat, Kandahar and Jalalabad, MAIL undertook crop assessment in the following, remaining 10 provinces also: • West Farah (1 province; RFA Herat) • West Central Ghor (1 province; RFA Herat) • South Paktika and Ghazni (2 provinces; RFA Kandahar) • East Nuristan (1 provinces; RFA Nangharhar) • South-West Kandahar, Helmand, Zabul, Nimroz and Uruzgan (5 provinces; RFA Kandahar) This report provides preliminary estimates of the 2010 cereal crop outputs and cereal surplus/deficit, based mainly on above-mentioned missions’ findings. The MAIL and DAIL missions held discussions with the provincial and district staff. They collected provincial level information and data on crop area/production, livestock condition and adverse factors (e.g. drought, floods, avalanche, frost, pests, diseases, etc.). The missions interviewed over 4,000 farmers across 34 provinces. The 34 MAIL/DAIL assessment missions submitted semi-processed reports by the third week of May. These reports were quickly processed at MAIL for analysis, interpretation and report writing. This APR is based on (i) updated assessment reports collected from DAIL, (ii) the results of the farmers’ survey, (iii) historical data sets and (iv) information and data from other sources. As the primary aim of the assessment is to produce consistent official data, emphasis is laid more on the use of relative data reported by DAIL, farmers and others. For example, for validation and consistency checks, missions’ data were compared with the benchmark crop data of 2003 and 2009, and with other historical data sets and the latest rainfall amount/pattern and satellite maps. Technical departments of Page 1 MAIL in Kabul and in the provinces provide a wealth of information on current crop and livestock situation. Information and data provided by FAO projects, FAO area offices and units, USGS Agro- met project, FEWS NET, WFP, and FAO missions were also important sources of information for this APR. 2. Weather and crop condition a. Weather data All areas of the country with the exception of some parts of the eastern and south-western regions experienced good amount of rainfall in November 2009. The rainfall amount in December 2009 was also above normal in all but some parts of the eastern and central regions. The amount and distribution of rainfall in January 2010 was not enough for optimal growth and development of crops and pasture. However, all parts of the country experienced very good amount and distribution of rainfall in February 2010. Rainfall amounts in March and April 2010 were also satisfactory in the main crop growing areas. (Annex 1) Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) in the period 21st-30th April is presented in Annex 7. The map confirms that, for most parts of the country, there is above average density and greenness of the plant and pasture canopy in end-April 2010. Reports from the field also suggest that the weather condition in May is generally very favorable to the standing crops. b. Ground truth data Towards the end of January, overall condition of the winter crops was not so good. However, from the first week of February, weather condition in most parts of the country was highly satisfactory for planting, growth and development of the winter cereal crops. The weather condition in that period benefited spring planting of crops and pasture also. Thanks to the weather conditions in February, majority of the intended area for irrigated winter wheat and barley was planted. The planting of rainfed wheat also progressed very well and the winter crops revived in all parts of the country dramatically. The results of the provincial reports/feedback and farmers’ interviews suggest that a reasonably good cereal harvest will be reaped this year. Both irrigated and rainfed crops are in good conditions so far. The factors that contributed towards reasonably good cereal production prospects in 2010 are: (i) satisfactory rainfall pattern, especially in the beginning and the later part of the season (ii) increased use of improved seeds1 and chemical fertilizers (iii) effective and timely control of pests and diseases 3. Cereal Area, Production, Requirement and Deficit The average annual cereal production of Afghanistan in the last 5 years (2005 to 2009) was 5.2 million tons. Overall cereal production in 2010 is estimated to be 5.7 million tons, which is 10% below the last year’s level
Recommended publications
  • Afghanistan State Structure and Security Forces
    European Asylum Support Office Afghanistan State Structure and Security Forces Country of Origin Information Report August 2020 SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION European Asylum Support Office Afghanistan State Structure and Security Forces Country of Origin Information Report August 2020 More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). ISBN: 978-92-9485-650-0 doi: 10.2847/115002 BZ-02-20-565-EN-N © European Asylum Support Office (EASO) 2020 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, unless otherwise stated. For third-party materials reproduced in this publication, reference is made to the copyrights statements of the respective third parties. Cover photo: © Al Jazeera English, Helmand, Afghanistan 3 November 2012, url CC BY-SA 2.0 Taliban On the Doorstep: Afghan soldiers from 215 Corps take aim at Taliban insurgents. 4 — AFGHANISTAN: STATE STRUCTURE AND SECURITY FORCES - EASO COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION REPORT Acknowledgements This report was drafted by the European Asylum Support Office COI Sector. The following national asylum and migration department contributed by reviewing this report: The Netherlands, Office for Country Information and Language Analysis, Ministry of Justice It must be noted that the review carried out by the mentioned departments, experts or organisations contributes to the overall quality of the report, it but does not necessarily imply their formal endorsement of the final report, which is the full responsibility of EASO. AFGHANISTAN: STATE STRUCTURE AND SECURITY
    [Show full text]
  • AFGHANISTAN - Base Map KYRGYZSTAN
    AFGHANISTAN - Base map KYRGYZSTAN CHINA ± UZBEKISTAN Darwaz !( !( Darwaz-e-balla Shaki !( Kof Ab !( Khwahan TAJIKISTAN !( Yangi Shighnan Khamyab Yawan!( !( !( Shor Khwaja Qala !( TURKMENISTAN Qarqin !( Chah Ab !( Kohestan !( Tepa Bahwddin!( !( !( Emam !( Shahr-e-buzorg Hayratan Darqad Yaftal-e-sufla!( !( !( !( Saheb Mingajik Mardyan Dawlat !( Dasht-e-archi!( Faiz Abad Andkhoy Kaldar !( !( Argo !( Qaram (1) (1) Abad Qala-e-zal Khwaja Ghar !( Rostaq !( Khash Aryan!( (1) (2)!( !( !( Fayz !( (1) !( !( !( Wakhan !( Khan-e-char Char !( Baharak (1) !( LEGEND Qol!( !( !( Jorm !( Bagh Khanaqa !( Abad Bulak Char Baharak Kishim!( !( Teer Qorghan !( Aqcha!( !( Taloqan !( Khwaja Balkh!( !( Mazar-e-sharif Darah !( BADAKHSHAN Garan Eshkashem )"" !( Kunduz!( !( Capital Do Koh Deh !(Dadi !( !( Baba Yadgar Khulm !( !( Kalafgan !( Shiberghan KUNDUZ Ali Khan Bangi Chal!( Zebak Marmol !( !( Farkhar Yamgan !( Admin 1 capital BALKH Hazrat-e-!( Abad (2) !( Abad (2) !( !( Shirin !( !( Dowlatabad !( Sholgareh!( Char Sultan !( !( TAKHAR Mir Kan Admin 2 capital Tagab !( Sar-e-pul Kent Samangan (aybak) Burka Khwaja!( Dahi Warsaj Tawakuli Keshendeh (1) Baghlan-e-jadid !( !( !( Koran Wa International boundary Sabzposh !( Sozma !( Yahya Mussa !( Sayad !( !( Nahrin !( Monjan !( !( Awlad Darah Khuram Wa Sarbagh !( !( Jammu Kashmir Almar Maymana Qala Zari !( Pul-e- Khumri !( Murad Shahr !( !( (darz !( Sang(san)charak!( !( !( Suf-e- (2) !( Dahana-e-ghory Khowst Wa Fereng !( !( Ab) Gosfandi Way Payin Deh Line of control Ghormach Bil Kohestanat BAGHLAN Bala !( Qaysar !( Balaq
    [Show full text]
  • Maah/Mrrd/Fao/Wfp National Crop Output Assessment
    FAO FAAHM/AFGHANISTAN OSRO/AFG/111/USA MAAH/MRRD/FAO/WFP NATIONAL CROP OUTPUT ASSESSMENT 10th May to 5th June 2003 Farmer met in Badghis while weeding his rain-fed wheat field, 23 May 2003. Raphy Favre, FAO/FAIT Agronomist Consultant, Mission TL Anthony Fitzherbert, FAO Consultant Javier Escobedo, FAO Emergency Agronomist Consultant 25th July 2003 Kabul TABLE OF CONTENT I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II. INTRODUCTION III. METHODOLOGY 1. Estimation of Yield 1.1 Field Measurements for Yield Estimates 1.2 Crop Development Stage at the Time of the Assessment 1.3 Interviews with Farmers in the Field 1.4 Selection of Districts and Transects 1.5 Selection of Fields 2. Estimation of Land planted 3. Market Prices IV. RESULTS 4. Estimated Planted Area 4.1 Irrigated Land 4.2 Rain-fed Land 5. Estimated Wheat Yield 5.1 Irrigated Land 5.2 Rain-fed Land 6. Estimated Wheat Production 6.1 Irrigated Land 6.2 Rain-fed Land 6.3 Total Production 6.4 Agricultural Constraints in 2003 7. Estimated Barley Production at Regional Level 8. Wheat Grain Prices V. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS ANNEXES ANNEX I - Changes of the Itinerary and Teams Composition due to Security Situation in Southern Afghanistan ANNEX II - Participants ANNEX III - Mission Itinerary and Districts covered by the Survey 2 TABLES Table 1: Estimated irrigated cultivated land in 2003; Total irrigated land cultivated In 2003, irrigated Wheat cultivated and irrigated Barley cultivated in 2003. Table 2: Estimated rain-fed cultivated land in 2003; Total rain-fed land cultivated in 2003, rain-fed Wheat cultivated and rain-fed Barley cultivated in 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • AFGHANISTAN MAP Central Region
    Chal #S Aliabad #S BALKH Char Kent Hazrat- e Sultan #S AFGHANISTAN MAP #S Qazi Boi Qala #S Ishkamesh #S Baba Ewaz #S Central Region #S Aibak Sar -e Pul Islam Qala Y# Bur ka #S #S #S Y# Keshendeh ( Aq Kopruk) Baghlan-e Jadeed #S Bashi Qala Du Abi #S Darzab #S #S Dehi Pul-e Khumri Afghan Kot # #S Dahana- e Ghori #S HIC/ProMIS Y#S Tukzar #S wana Khana #S #S SAMANGAN Maimana Pasni BAGHLAN Sar chakan #S #S FARYAB Banu Doshi Khinjan #S LEGEND SARI PUL Ruy-e Du Ab Northern R#S egion#S Tarkhoj #S #S Zenya BOUNDARIES Qala Bazare Tala #S #S #S International Kiraman Du Ab Mikh Zar in Rokha #S #S Province #S Paja Saighan #S #S Ezat Khel Sufla Haji Khel District Eshqabad #S #S Qaq Shal #S Siyagerd #S UN Regions Bagram Nijrab Saqa #S Y# Y# Mahmud-e Raqi Bamyan #S #S #S Shibar Alasai Tagab PASaRlahWzada AN CharikarQara Bagh Mullah Mohd Khel #S #S Istalif CENTERS #S #S #S #S #S Y# Kalakan %[ Capital Yakawlang #S KAPISA #S #S Shakar Dara Mir Bacha Kot #S Y# Province Sor ubi Par k- e Jamhuriat Tara Khel BAMYAN #S #S Kabul#S #S Lal o Sar Jangal Zar Kharid M District Tajikha Deh Qazi Hussain Khel Y# #S #S Kota-e Ashro %[ Central Region #S #S #S KABUL #S ROADS Khord Kabul Panjab Khan-e Ezat Behsud Y# #S #S Chaghcharan #S Maidan Shar #S All weather Primary #S Ragha Qala- e Naim WARDAK #S Waras Miran Muhammad Agha All weather Secondary #S #S #S Azro LOGAR #S Track East Chake-e Wnar dtark al RegiKolangar GHOR #S #S RIVERS Khoshi Sayyidabad Bar aki Bar ak #S # #S Ali Khel Khadir #S Y Du Abi Main #S #S Gh #S Pul-e Alam Western Region Kalan Deh Qala- e Amr uddin
    [Show full text]
  • Update on Firing Ranges (Frs), June 2021 Firing Ranges (Frs) Background
    State Ministry for Disaster Management and Humanitarian Affairs Directorate of Mine Action Coordination (DMAC) Mine Action Programme of Afghanistan (MAPA) Update On Firing Ranges (FRs), June 2021 Firing Ranges (FRs) Background Total # # of FRs # of FRs # of FRs # of FRs # of FRs Countries Remarks of FRs Surveyed Completed Cancelled Released Remaining United 85 85 62 0 62 23 UK also have contribution in some State (US) US FRs in Helmand Province German 6 3 2 0 2 4 Fortunately Germany also contracted its one FR in Balkh. Status of 3 FRs is not clear yet. New 5 5 0 1 1 4 Four FRs is ongoing and will be Zealand completed by November 2021 (NZ) Different 16 16 2 2 4 12 Two FRs cleared and two were Countries cancelled Grand 112 109 66 3 69 43 Total Firing Ranges (FRs) Geographical Locations & Status Map Graphical Representation – FRs Status 1,400 1,235 1,200 1,000 800 679.5 600 540 400 200 15.6 - Released Worked on Open Total Achievements (LR and PDIA) § 69 FRs , covering 540 sq. km area released. § Over 184,000 items of EO destroyed § Post Demining Impact Assessment (PDIA) conducted on 21 released FRs. After FR clearance the land is used for agriculture Released/Closed FRs Location Map 69 FRs Released/Closed- 540 Sq Km FRs Remaining Contamination Location Map 39 FRs Open - 679.5 Sq Km 4 FRs Worked on – 15.6 Sq Km Remaining Open FRs-Details Region Province District Village Contaminated By Status Hazard ID Hazard Name Longitude Latitude Hazard Area FR Belongs To Remarks Central Kapisa Tagab Tagab ANSF/NATO/ISAF Open Hz-ID-22430 AF/0205/00827/FR0001B
    [Show full text]
  • Länderinformationen Afghanistan Country
    Staatendokumentation Country of Origin Information Afghanistan Country Report Security Situation (EN) from the COI-CMS Country of Origin Information – Content Management System Compiled on: 17.12.2020, version 3 This project was co-financed by the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund Disclaimer This product of the Country of Origin Information Department of the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum was prepared in conformity with the standards adopted by the Advisory Council of the COI Department and the methodology developed by the COI Department. A Country of Origin Information - Content Management System (COI-CMS) entry is a COI product drawn up in conformity with COI standards to satisfy the requirements of immigration and asylum procedures (regional directorates, initial reception centres, Federal Administrative Court) based on research of existing, credible and primarily publicly accessible information. The content of the COI-CMS provides a general view of the situation with respect to relevant facts in countries of origin or in EU Member States, independent of any given individual case. The content of the COI-CMS includes working translations of foreign-language sources. The content of the COI-CMS is intended for use by the target audience in the institutions tasked with asylum and immigration matters. Section 5, para 5, last sentence of the Act on the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum (BFA-G) applies to them, i.e. it is as such not part of the country of origin information accessible to the general public. However, it becomes accessible to the party in question by being used in proceedings (party’s right to be heard, use in the decision letter) and to the general public by being used in the decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Region CP 2012.Pdf (English)
    Central Region Contingency Plan Humanitarian Regional Team Multi-Hazard Contingency Plan Central Region (Kabul, Kapisa, Logar, Wardak, Panjshir and Parwan Provinces) Period Covered March – December 2012 Last updated 19 Mar 2012 Central Region Contingency Plan Central Region Contingency Plan Table of Contents 1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 4 1.1 Regional Context by Hazards .................................................................... 4 1.1.1 Hazards and Risk Analysis .................................................................. 6 1.1.2 Cross-cutting Risks ........................................................................... 7 2 Coordination Arrangements ............................................................................ 8 2.1 National / Local Authorities’ responsibilities ................................................. 8 2.1.1 Disaster occurrence ......................................................................... 8 2.1.2 Operational procedures ..................................................................... 8 2.2 Humanitarian community: UN AFPs, INGOs and NNGOs ..................................... 9 2.2.1 The cluster approach ........................................................................ 9 2.3 Overview of Emergency Preparedness and Response Partners .... Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.4 Response Matrix................................................................................... 10 ANNEXES (see separate
    [Show full text]
  • Caring for Their Own: a Stronger Afghan Response to Civilian Harm
    Part of the Countries in Conflict Series Caring for Their Own: A Stronger Afghan Response to Civilian Harm CARING FOR THEIR OWN: A STRONGER AFGHAN RESPONSE TO CIVILIAN HARM Acknowledgements Center for Civilians in Conflict would like to thank Open Society Foundations (OSF), which provided funding to support this research and offered insightful comments during the drafting of this report. We also appreciate the Afghan translators and interpreters that worked diligently to deliver quality research for this report, as well as those that offered us travel assistance. Finally, Center for Civilians in Conflict is deeply grateful to all those interviewed for this report, especially civilians suffering from the con- flict in Afghanistan, for their willingness to share their stories, experi- ences and views with us. Copyright © 2013 Center for Civilians in Conflict (formerly CIVIC) All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America. Copies of this report are available for download at: www.civiliansinconflict.org NOTE: Many names in this report have been changed to protect the identity of those interviewed. Cover photo courtesy of James Longley. All photos in text by Trevor Keck/Center for Civilians in Conflict. Map of Afghanistan C A m H 64 u 66 68 70 72 Mur 74 H ° D ° ° ° a-ye ° gho ° ar y b INA ya UZBEKISTAN r INA a AFGHANISTAN D Qurghonteppa TAJIKISTAN Kerki (Kurgan-Tyube) Mary Kiroya iz M rm Dusti Khorugh u e BADAKHSHAN r T g a Keleft Rostaq FayzFayzabad Abad b ir Qala-I-Panjeh Andkhvoy Jeyretan am JAWZJAN P Mazar-e-Sharif KUNDUZ
    [Show full text]
  • AFGHANISTAN: Poverty in Provinces (Provincial Briefs, NRVA 2007/08)
    AFGHANISTAN: Poverty in Provinces (Provincial Briefs, NRVA 2007/08) Proportion of population whose per-capita consumption is below the poverty line Jawzjan Kunduz Balkh Takhar Badakhshan Samangan Faryab Baghlan Sari Pul Panjsher Nuristan Badghis Bamyan Parwan Kapisa Kunar Poverty Measures Laghman Ghor Maydan Kabul The headcount rate or poverty incidence or poverty rate is the proportion of Hirat Wardak Nangarhar population whose per-capita consumption is below the poverty line i.e. the Logar Poverty Rate poverty threshold of 1,255 Afs (approximately 25 USD) monthly consumption Daykundi 9 - 10 expenditure representing the typical cost of attaining 2,100 calories per person Paktya Ghazni Khost 11 - 20 per day and of meeting some basic non-food needs. 21 - 30 Uruzgan The poverty line or poverty threshold is the minimum level of per-capita Paktika National Average = 36 31 - 36 Farah consumption expenditure at which the members of a household can be expected Zabul 37 - 50 to meet their basic needs (comprised of food and non-food consumption). 51 - 60 Per-capita monthly total consumption is the value of food and non-food items 61 - 76 Kandahar consumed by a household in a month (including the use value of durable goods and housing) divided by the household size. Nimroz Hilmand The poverty gap index measures the depth of poverty, by calculating the mean aggregate consumption shortfall relative to the poverty line across the whole population. The poverty gap gives an indication of the total resources required to bring all the poor up to the level
    [Show full text]
  • In Yohanan Friedmann (Ed.), Islam in Asia, Vol. 1 (Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 1984), P
    Notes INTRODUCTION: AFGHANISTAN’S ISLAM 1. Cited in C. Edmund Bosworth, “The Coming of Islam to Afghanistan,” in Yohanan Friedmann (ed.), Islam in Asia, vol. 1 (Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 1984), p. 13. 2. Erica C. D. Hunter, “The Church of the East in Central Asia,” Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester 78 (1996), pp. 129–42. On Herat, see pp. 131–34. 3. On Afghanistan’s Jews, see the discussion and sources later in this chapter and notes 163 to 169. 4. Bosworth (1984; above, note 1), pp. 1–22; idem, “The Appearance and Establishment of Islam in Afghanistan,” in Étienne de la Vaissière (ed.), Islamisation de l’Asie Centrale: Processus locaux d’acculturation du VIIe au XIe siècle, Cahiers de Studia Iranica 39 (Paris: Association pour l’Avancement des Études Iraniennes, 2008); and Gianroberto Scarcia, “Sull’ultima ‘islamizzazione’ di Bāmiyān,” Annali dell’Istituto Universitario Orientale di Napoli, new series, 16 (1966), pp. 279–81. On the early Arabic sources on Balkh, see Paul Schwarz, “Bemerkungen zu den arabischen Nachrichten über Balkh,” in Jal Dastur Cursetji Pavry (ed.), Oriental Studies in Honour of Cursetji Erachji Pavry (London: Oxford Univer- sity Press, 1933). 5. Hugh Kennedy and Arezou Azad, “The Coming of Islam to Balkh,” in Marie Legen- dre, Alain Delattre, and Petra Sijpesteijn (eds.), Authority and Control in the Countryside: Late Antiquity and Early Islam (London: Darwin Press, forthcoming). 6. For example, Geoffrey Khan (ed.), Arabic Documents from Early Islamic Khurasan (London: Nour Foundation/Azimuth Editions, 2007). 7. Richard W. Bulliet, Conversion to Islam in the Medieval Period: An Essay in Quan- titative History (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979); Derryl Maclean, Re- ligion and Society in Arab Sind (Leiden: Brill, 1989); idem, “Ismailism, Conversion, and Syncretism in Arab Sind,” Bulletin of the Henry Martyn Institute of Islamic Studies 11 (1992), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • AFGHANISTAN: Health Organizations in Districts (3W) October 2012
    AFGHANISTAN: Health Organizations in Districts (3W) October 2012 Darwaz AKDN Darwazbala AKDN 2 3 DRAFT Shaki 2 AKDN Kuf Ab AKDN WORK IN PROGRESS 2 Khw2ahan TA J I K I S T A N CAF, Medair Raghistan 3 CAF, Kinder Berg Shighnan Note: WHO supports government in national coverage U Z B E K I S TA N AKDN 5 Darqad Chah Ab CAF 2 Yangi CAF Yawan Kohistan 3 Q3ala 5 Shahri Buzurg CAF CAF, Merlin 1 CAF Qarqin Khwaja BahCaAwF uddin BDN, MOVE 2 CAF, Turkish 4 Yaftal Sufla 2 2 Shortepa Foundation CAF, 6Kinder 3 CHA Berg, Merlin Fayzabad Kham Ab Dashti 1 Sharak Hairatan 2 AKDN1,4 ARCS, Arghanj BDN, MOVE Imam Sahib Qala CAF, ICRC, Shahada Khaw Khani Chahar Mangajek Kaldar ARCS, Merlin CAF Kinder CAF, SHDP 5 Khwaja Du 3 Berg, MoPH CAF Qurghan Bagh 1 MOVE, SAF CHA 13 9 4 3 AADA Koh Mardyan C H I N A AADA 2 2 8 Dashte Archi Rustaq Argo 1 SAF BDN Dawlatabad Khwaja Baha3rak Kinder Berg, 4 CAF, CDAP CAF Kinder Berg, Jawzjan CHA Ghar 5 Merlin Hazar Merlin, SHDP 1 2 Aqcha Qalay-I- Zal CAF Sum1uch Khash 2 Khulm Kunduz Andkhoy BDN Chahar Bolak Balkh Merlin SHDP Kishim Darayim SHDP 2 CA4F, Kinder 3 Qaramqol Khaniqa 7 ARCS, 4 Nahri CHA Kunduz Baharak 3 CAF, AADA Fayzabad ARCS, CHA 12 7 5 23 Berg, Merlin Jurm Warduj AADA 1 BDN, MOVE BDN, CHA, Mazari ShSahraifhi ARCS, Kinder Taluqan Kinder Berg 2 BDN Kinder Berg, SHDP ARCS, Kinder 3 Kinder Berg, AFGA, ARCS, CHA, IAM, Berg, Merlin, Kalfagan 7 Tashkan 3 JACK CHA MoPH, 1B5erg, MoPH, Merlin, 5 AKDN, Shibirghan LEPCO, MoPH, MSI, Chahar Dara SHDP 22 Marmul Spinzar SHDP, Turkish CAF, Kinder Berg, Ishkashiem Afghan turk, Merlin
    [Show full text]
  • AFGHANISTAN: Natural Hazard Risks Issued: 12 July 2007
    OCHA Regional Office for Asia Pacific AFGHANISTAN: Natural Hazard Risks Issued: 12 July 2007 Seismic, Volcanic and Tropical Storm Risk UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) Regional Office for Asia Pacific (ROAP), Executive Suite, 2nd Floor, UNCC T A J I K I S T A N Building, Rajdamnern Nok Ave, Bangkok 10200, Thailand http://ochaonline.un.org/roap T U R K M E N I S T A N Qarqin Qarchi Gak Andkhvoy 17 15 Khandud 27 Mazar-e Sharif Khanabad Taloqan Balkh Kholm 16 Eshkashem Farkhar 26 Baghlan JAMMU Tokzar Aybak AND 28 19 Nahrin 18 9 KASHMIR Chiras Bala Morghab 8 14 Asmar 31 Charikar 2 13 3 Mehtar Lam Chaghcharan 1 7 Ghurian Herat Panjab 10 Kabul Jalalabad 4 6 20 Achin 32 5 Islamabad 21 Ghazni 12 Shindand 11 25 Anar Darreh Baghran 22 Zarghun 33 Shahr Farah 24 Sangin 23 Gereshk Afghanistan Provinces Lashkar Gah Kandahar 1. Kabul 18. Samangan 2. Kapisa 19. Sari Pul 3. Parwan 20. Ghor Zaranj 30 4. Maydan Wardak 21. Daykundi 5. Logar 22. Uruzgan 34 29 6. Nangarhar 23. Zabul Mirabad 7. Laghman 24. Paktika 8. Panjsher 25. Khost 9. Baghlan 26. Balkh Rudbar 10. Bamyan 27. Jawzjan 11. Ghazni 28. Faryab 12. Paktya 29. Hilmand 13. Kunar 30. Kandahar 14. Nuristan 31. Badghis 15. Badakhshan 32. Hirat 16. Ta kh a r 33. Farah P A K I S T A N 17. Kunduz 34. Nimroz Ta ft an I N D I A I R A N All Natural Hazard Risks The bar chart below show the degree of exposure to natural hazards and the percentage of area affected.
    [Show full text]