Conference on Interaction and Confidence-Building Measures in Asia Cica

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conference on Interaction and Confidence-Building Measures in Asia Cica CONFERENCE ON INTERACTION AND CONFIDENCE-BUILDING MEASURES IN ASIA CICA 2018 UFRGSMUN | UFRGS Model United Nations ISSN 2318-3195 | v. 6 2018 | p. 88 - 131 POWER PROJECTION IN THE INDIAN OCEAN: COOPERATION OR QUEST FOR DOMINANCE? Camilla Martins Pereira1 Daiana Winter Jung2 Gabriela de Mendonça Lima Penna3 ABSTRACT The main goal of the present study guide is to address the impacts and the per- sistent dynamics of the militarization of the Indian Ocean as a situation of power projection. By setting a stage of complex competition, the interactions in the Indian Ocean Region can transform not only Asian, but also global economic and politi- cal conditions, contributing to the emergence of the Asian protagonism. At first, the historical background presents an analysis dating back to the imperialist period (1870-1914), insofar as the region has long been a stage for challenges and threats until current times. Then, we expose how the current Indian Ocean situation re- presents an example of a security dilemma4 in some aspects, whilst actions taken by U.S., China and India intend to expand influence in the region. We also discuss the major strategic interests behind the militarization of the Indian Ocean, as exempli- fied by politics taken attempting to control the channels and other paths connected to the ocean. Afterwards, we highlight the main actors involved in this competition through the presentation of strategic points taken by the states or under their mili- tary influence – each one aiming at placing a secure basis for economic or military purposes – as well as the importance of Asian countries’ participation in the overall military spending of the region. 1 Camilla is a third-year student of International Relations at UFRGS and CICA’s Director. 2 Daiana is a fourth-year student of International Relations at UFRGS and CICA’s Director. 3 Gabriela is a second-year student of International Relations at UFRGS and CICA’s Assistant-Director. 4 A security dilemma may be described as a case in which a state, seeking to guarantee its own secu- rity, increases its military capabilities, being, due to this move, followed by others. This concept will be better approached in the section two of the present study guide. 89 UFRGSMUN | CONFERENCE ON INTERACTION AND CONFIDENCE-BUILDING MEASURES IN ASIA 1 INTRODUCTION By current projections, the Indian Ocean and its adjacent waters will be a cen- tral geopolitical theater in the 21st century, although some aspects of this scenario are already visible, given the number of regional actors involved, their broad range of interests and the competition amongst China, India and the U.S. The region is one of the most complexes in the world, being a space that melds commercial, energetic and security dilemmas. It is also composed by a wide variety of races, ethnicities and religions, along with socioeconomic problems and a high level of political instability and sectarian tensions (Cordner 2010; Kaplan 2010). For analytical purposes, before starting to discuss the settings involved in the unfolding security issues in the Indian Ocean, we shall establish a few key-concepts. First, there is the definition of the geographic space under analysis. Although being a controversial subject, some authors have defined the Indian Ocean as the area be- tween 25-degree North and 60-degree South latitudes, while, longitudinally, it ex- tends from 20-degree East to 147-degree West (Cordesman and Toukan 2014). Besi- des being the third largest ocean of the world, the Indian Ocean encompasses the eastern coast of Africa, the Gulf States, South Asia, Southeast Asia and Australia. The Indian Ocean Region, from now on referred to as IOR, is surrounded by 56 littoral and hinterland nation-states, totaling 66,526 kilometers of coastline (Cordner 2010). In order to better understand the main risks and trends within this region, we will divide the IOR into five sub regions and refer to them throughout the article. Namely, they are: the Middle East and Gulf; the Red Sea and Horn; East Africa and Sub-Sahara; South Asia; and Southeast Asia/Oceania. The official perimeters can be seen in the image below, and include the “Andaman Sea, Arabian Sea, Bay of Bengal, Flores Sea, Great Australian Bight, Gulf of Aden, Gulf of Oman, Java Sea, Mozam- bique Channel, Persian Gulf, Red Sea, Savu Sea, Strait of Malacca5, Timor Sea, and other [...] water bodies” (Cordesman and Toukan 2014, 19). The present article, thus, aims at illustrating and analyzing the current situ- ation in the IOR. In this sense, we will present the contradictions of this scenario, including not only an historical retrospective to the imperialist years, but also an examination of the challenges and threats that persisted throughout the 20th centu- ry. Following that, we shall proceed with a statement about the current “Cold War” in the region, exposing the concerning actions taken by the U.S., China and India, respectively. Also, we will highlight the strategic importance of this ocean to the concerned states, and the cooperative measures able to mitigate tensions and build trust between the states, as well as the ones taken regarding the problems among them and non-state actors. Finally, we present a short chapter regarding the pre- vious international actions taken until now, finishing with the presentation of the position of CICA’s members on this issue. 5 The Strait of Malacca is a narrow, 805 km stretch of water between the Malay Peninsula and the In- donesian island of Sumatra. It is one of the most important shipping lanes in the world despite being only 2.8 km wide. This strait is the main shipping channel between the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean, linking major Asian economies such as India, China, Japan, and South Korea. Over 60,000 vessels pass through the strait each year, carrying about one-fourth of the world’s traded goods, in- cluding oil, Chinese manufactured products, and products from other countries. About a quarter of all oil carried by sea passes through the Strait, mainly from Persian Gulf suppliers to Asian markets. In addition, it is also one of the world’s most congested shipping choke points (Zhong 2018). 90 POWER PROJECTION IN THE INDIAN OCEAN: COOPERATION OR QUEST FOR DOMINANCE? IMAGE 1: THE INDIAN OCEAN REGION (IOR) Source: Kaplan 2010 2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND In order to better understand the impacts of the challenges that surround the IOR, we must analyze the regional dynamics since imperialism until the late 20th century. According to Pant (2012), the Indian Ocean has been, for a long time, the center of great power antagonism, and the battle for its governance has been a longstanding element of global politics. Geographically, the Indian Ocean has been the “home to four critical access waterways – the Suez Canal, Bab-el Mandeb, the Strait of Hormuz and the Strait of Malacca – the Indian Ocean connects the Middle East, Africa and East Asia with Europe and the Americas” (Pant 2012, 364). It contains not only the major oil shipping lanes, but also some of the main choke points of the world – important for the international business –, being, therefore, the busiest interstate ocean according to some analysts (Kaplan 2010). Hence, economic inte- ractions across the Indian Ocean have a long history: Since times immemorial, the IOR has been characterized by peace and pros- perity, added to an open and mutual dependence on trade. Colonial powers present since the 16th century, like the Portuguese, Dutch, French and the British, transformed it into an arena for securing their trade interests and gaining influence in the region (Chowdhury et al. 2014, 61). In the period of the colonial expansion, the Indian Ocean became the bastion of the global hegemony of the British Empire. India was a British pearl and, in many ways, was the main responsible for the economic and geopolitical rise of English hegemony (Anievas and Nisancioglu 2015). 91 UFRGSMUN | CONFERENCE ON INTERACTION AND CONFIDENCE-BUILDING MEASURES IN ASIA 2.1 A BRIEF REVIEW OF THE INDIAN OCEAN HISTORY: FROM IMPERIALISM TO THE POST-WORLD WAR II PERIOD The Indian Ocean has constituted a stage set for Western conquest going back more than five hundred years. These Western conquerors came largely for commer- cial reasons. Throughout the 19th century, the British became the intermediates of all the traffic amongst the Atlantic and Indian oceans. This control of sea routes was deepened with the construction of the Suez Canal (1867), in addition to the esta- blishment of military bases across the ocean, which would be capable to ensure the entrance and exit paths – especially those in Singapore (Malacca Strait) and in the Gulf of Aden. Besides, the rise of the Royal Navy in the Atlantic and in the Mediterra- nean, as well as the Industrial Revolution fueled the British Indian Ocean enterprise. Under the British East India Company administration, traditional Indian manufac- turing centers, ports and trade patterns fell into decline with the emergence of new geo-economics relations. The Indian subcontinent, which used to be economically prosperous, turned into the biggest demander of British goods and gradually lost its autonomy (Ribeiro and Otávio 2017). In the period following World War I, the hunt for oil in the Arab countries around the Gulf was intensified. Indeed, American and British companies positio- ned themselves on the region in such a way to allow them to control the world oil provisions and, consequently, its prices. Britain’s hegemony in the Indian Ocean continued until World War II, when the country’s relative economic decline and the war efforts undermined its ability to maintain a fleet of global reach, overseas colo- nies and control of distant sea routes (Ribeiro and Otávio 2017).
Recommended publications
  • State Terrorism in the Philippines Unmasking the Securitized Terror Behind ‘War on Drugs’
    MSc. Crisis & Security Management Thesis - Spring 2017 Leiden University, The Hague Campus State Terrorism in the Philippines Unmasking the securitized terror behind ‘War on Drugs’ Master Thesis, Spring 2017 George Plevris (s1722026) Supervisor: Dr. M. Kitzen Second Reader: Liesbeth van der Heide University of Leiden- The Hague Campus Master MSc. Crisis & Security Management May 2017 Leiden University 1 MSc. Crisis & Security Management Thesis - Spring 2017 By the end of this paper, I believe you will come to the same observation that I arrived: Terror (-ism) is the finest tool of political and social governance a state can deploy. If executed well, it does not only achieve the goal of submission of the audience, but it eliminates the latter’s tool of resistance: hope. Leiden University 2 MSc. Crisis & Security Management Thesis - Spring 2017 Abstract Typically, modern states have the monopoly on legitimate violence drawn from their sovereignty and democratic rule of law, on the behest of their citizens. This ‘legitimate’ violence however has seen a rise in the last two decades, and taken forms of intricate civil wars, wars on crime, wars on drugs and wars on terror. Yet, despite outcries for violations of laws and human rights, of crimes against humanity and war crimes, policies of extreme violence performed by the democratic states are hardly ever labeled as state terrorism. This paper will explore the scholarship of state terrorism, often a contested topic among academic and experts, and will approach the issue through the current ‘war on drugs’ raging in the Philippines. The theoretical premise that I will carve out aims to explore and acknowledge the existence of state terror but also the difficulty in naming it.
    [Show full text]
  • Extrajudicial Punishments to Combat the Philippine Drug War: Problem Or Solution?
    Loyola University Chicago International Law Review Volume 14 Issue 2 Article 4 2016 Extrajudicial Punishments to Combat the Philippine Drug War: Problem or Solution? Mikaela Y. Medina Follow this and additional works at: https://lawecommons.luc.edu/lucilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Mikaela Y. Medina Extrajudicial Punishments to Combat the Philippine Drug War: Problem or Solution?, 14 Loy. U. Chi. Int'l L. Rev. 155 (2016). Available at: https://lawecommons.luc.edu/lucilr/vol14/iss2/4 This Student Article is brought to you for free and open access by LAW eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola University Chicago International Law Review by an authorized editor of LAW eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EXTRAJUDICIAL PUNISHMENTS TO COMBAT THE PHILIPPINE DRUG WAR: PROBLEM OR SOLUTION? Mikaela Y. Medina* I. Introduction... ...................................... 155 II. Background ......................................... 157 A. Philippine Demographics ............................ 157 B. President Duterte's History of Violence .................. 158 III. Discussion .......................................... 160 IV . A nalysis ...................................................... 163 A. Contributing Factors to the Drug War ...................... 163 a. Poverty ............................................... 163 b. C hildren .............................................. 163 c. Government .................................. 164 B. The Use of Extrajudicial Punishments
    [Show full text]
  • War on Drugs - Wikipedia 17.08.17, 1140 War on Drugs from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    War on Drugs - Wikipedia 17.08.17, 1140 War on Drugs From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia "The War on Drugs" is an American term[6][7] usually applied to the United States government's campaign of prohibition of drugs, military aid, and military intervention, with the stated aim being to reduce the illegal drug trade.[8][9] This initiative includes a set of drug policies that are intended to discourage the production, distribution, and consumption of psychoactive drugs that the participating governments and the UN have made illegal. The term was popularized by the media shortly after a press conference given on June 18, 1971, by United States President Richard Nixon—the day after publication of a special message from President Nixon to As part of the War on Drugs, the US the Congress on Drug Abuse Prevention and Control—during which spends approximately $500 million per year on aid for Colombia, largely used to he declared drug abuse "public enemy number one". That message to combat guerrilla groups such as FARC the Congress included text about devoting more federal resources to that are involved in the illegal drug the "prevention of new addicts, and the rehabilitation of those who trade.[1][2][3][4][5] are addicted", but that part did not receive the same public attention as the term "war on drugs".[10][11][12] However, two years prior to this, Nixon had formally declared a "war on drugs" that would be directed toward eradication, interdiction, and incarceration.[13] Today, the Drug Policy Alliance, which advocates for an end to the
    [Show full text]
  • The Philippines' War on Drugs (Read: the Poor)
    INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INTERNSHIP PROGRAM | WORKING PAPER SERIES VOL 8 | NO. 1 | FALL 2020 The Philippines’ War on Drugs (Read: The Poor): The Erosion of the Rule of Law and the Violation of Children’s Human Rights Kathleen Barera ABOUT CHRLP Established in September 2005, the Centre for Human Rights and Legal Pluralism (CHRLP) was formed to provide students, professors and the larger community with a locus of intellectual and physical resources for engaging critically with the ways in which law affects some of the most compelling social problems of our modern era, most notably human rights issues. Since then, the Centre has distinguished itself by its innovative legal and interdisciplinary approach, and its diverse and vibrant community of scholars, students and practitioners working at the intersection of human rights and legal pluralism. CHRLP is a focal point for innovative legal and interdisciplinary research, dialogue and outreach on issues of human rights and legal pluralism. The Centre’s mission is to provide students, professors and the wider community with a locus of intellectual and physical resources for engaging critically with how law impacts upon some of the compelling social problems of our modern era. A key objective of the Centre is to deepen transdisciplinary — 2 collaboration on the complex social, ethical, political and philosophical dimensions of human rights. The current Centre initiative builds upon the human rights legacy and enormous scholarly engagement found in the Universal Declartion of Human Rights. ABOUT THE SERIES The Centre for Human Rights and Legal Pluralism (CHRLP) Working Paper Series enables the dissemination of papers by students who have participated in the Centre’s International Human Rights Internship Program (IHRIP).
    [Show full text]
  • “License to Kill”: Philippine Police Killings in Duterte's “War on Drugs
    H U M A N R I G H T S “License to Kill” Philippine Police Killings in Duterte’s “War on Drugs” WATCH License to Kill Philippine Police Killings in Duterte’s “War on Drugs” Copyright © 2017 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-34488 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org MARCH 2017 ISBN: 978-1-6231-34488 “License to Kill” Philippine Police Killings in Duterte’s “War on Drugs” Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Key Recommendations ..................................................................................................... 24 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 25 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Dangerous Speech and Social Media Uncharted Strategies for Mitigating Harm Online
    Dangerous Speech and Social Media Uncharted Strategies for Mitigating Harm Online Client Organization Center for Strategic & International Studies Advisor Sohini Chatterjee Contributors James Courtright Hanna Homestead Isabelle Lee Daniyar Yerseitovich Nuraldinov Dan Poniachik Jasmine Ramsey Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs, Spring 2020 Capstone: Online Hate Speech & Communal Conflict: Identifying New Conflict Prevention Tools Contents I. Introduction II. Brazil III. Philippines IV. Nigeria V. Policy Recommendations 2 INTRODUCTION 3 Over the last decade, social media has fundamentally changed the way people communicate and access information around the world. While social media platforms provide new forums for constructive dialogue and personal expression, they are also used to proliferate dangerous online speech. Dangerous speech is defined as “any form of expression (e.g. speech, text, or images) that can increase the risk that its audience will condone or commit violence against members of another group.” The characteristics of dangerous speech are that it promotes fear, and is commonly false, causes indirect harm, and is aimed at groups based on a shared identity.1 Overall, the response of governments and social media companies to the problem of online dangerous speech has been inconsistent and stymied by concerns over infringement of free speech rights, lack of will or capacity, and obfuscation over who is accountable for monitoring online content. Social media companies such as WhatsApp, Facebook, and Twitter, in particular, have been criticized for failing to address their role in exacerbating identity-based conflict by providing an online platform for dangerous speech. This report investigates how dangerous speech shared on social media has intensified identity-based violence in Brazil, the Philippines, and Nigeria.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philippines' Antidrug Campaign Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Killings Linked to Drugs
    International Journal of Drug Policy 73 (2019) 100–111 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Drug Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/drugpo Research paper The Philippines’ antidrug campaign: Spatial and temporal patterns of T killings linked to drugs ⁎ Jenna Mae L. Atuna, Ronald U. Mendozaa, Clarissa C. Davida,b, , Radxeanel Peviluar N. Cossida, Cheryll Ruth R. Sorianoc a Ateneo School of Government, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines b Graduate Studies Department, College of Mass Communication, University of the Philippines-Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines c Department of Communication, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Background: As soon as President Rodrigo Duterte assumed office in 2016, the Philippine government launched Drug war a nationwide antidrug campaign based on enforcement-led anti-illegal drugs policies primarily implemented by Antidrug campaign the national police. This was followed by a spate of killings resulting from both acknowledged police operations Killings and by unidentified assailants. This study assembles a victim-level dataset of drug-related killings covered bythe Philippines media during the Philippine government’s antidrug campaign, and presents a spatial and temporal analysis of Dataset the killings. Methods: The dataset covers information on 5021 people killed from May 10, 2016 to September 29, 2017. Data collected systematically through online search procedures and existing listings of media organizations detailing information about incidences of drug-related police operations and drug-related killings in 'vigilante-style' manner reveal patterns for who were being killed, where, and how. Results: Over half of the killings were due to acknowledged police operations, and the rest were targeted in so- called 'vigilante-style' killings.
    [Show full text]
  • If You Are Poor You Are Killed”: Extrajudicial Executions in The
    “IF YOU ARE POOR, YOU ARE KILLED” EXTRAJUDICIAL EXECUTIONS IN THE PHILIPPINES’ “WAR ON DRUGS” Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. Cover photo: The body of one of four men killed by unknown armed persons is taken out of the alleged © Amnesty International 2017 ‘drug den’ where the shootings took place, 12 December 2016, Pasig City, Metro Manila. The case was Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons one of two documented by Amnesty International delegates observing journalists’ night-shift coverage of (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. police activities. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Screengrab, © Amnesty International (photographer Alyx Ayn Arumpac) For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2017 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: ASA 35/5517/2017 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS MAP 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 METHODOLOGY 9 1. BACKGROUND 10 2. APPLICABLE LAW 13 2.1 INTERNATIONAL LEGAL OBLIGATIONS 13 2.2 NATIONAL FRAMEWORK 15 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Extrajudicial Killings and Human Rights Education in the Philippines
    ALEXANDER AGNELLO ・ Volume 5 n° 6 ・ Spring 2017 Extrajudicial Killings and Human Rights Education in the Philippines International Human Rights Internships Program - Working Paper Series About the Working Paper Series The Centre for Human Rights and Legal Pluralism (CHRLP) Working Paper Series enables the dissemination of papers by students who have participated in the Centre’s International Human Rights Internship Program (IHRIP). Through the program, students complete placements with NGOs, government institutions, and tribunals where they gain practical work experience in human rights investigation, monitoring, and reporting. Students then write a research paper, supported by a peer review process, while participating in a seminar that critically engages with human rights discourses. In accordance with McGill University’s Charter of Students’ Rights, students in this course have the right to submit in English or in French any written work that is to be graded. Therefore, papers in this series may be published in either language. The papers in this series are distributed free of charge and are available in PDF format on the CHRLP’s website. Papers may be downloaded for personal use only. The opinions expressed in these papers remain solely those of the author(s). They should not be attributed to the CHRLP or McGill University. The papers in this series are intended to elicit feedback and to encourage debate on important public policy challenges. Copyright belongs to the author(s). 1 Abstract Extrajudicial killings in the Philippines have been denounced by the international community as a clear derogation from the rule of law. However, that statement by itself does not tell us which aspects of the rule of law are being corroded by the commission of extrajudicial killings.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Aftermath of Duterte's
    In the aftermath of Duterte’s war A public policy perspective Angelita Bombarda Master of Public Administration, Class of 2018 Central European University ©Martin San Diego Photo modified to black and white ABSTRACT Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte, who was ushered into power on July 1, 2016, promised an iron fist, which has manifested in an all-out war on drugs (Iyengar, 2016). As of January 2017, a mere six months since Duterte began his term, his bloody war had already resulted in 7,080 casualties. To date 932,237 drug users and 74,916 low-level dealers have surrendered out of fear of being executed. However, with fewer than 50 accredited rehabilitation facilities in the Philippines, the government was not prepared for the deluge of drug users and pushers who have turned themselves in. Rehabilitation has clearly been absent from Duterte’s anti-drug campaign. His drug war has escalated into a highly divisive huma rights issue, with potentially damaging political implications to those who may oppose it. At the same time, it brings to light the glaring inability of the international community to meaningfully respond to the absurdity that is happening in the Philippines amidst very strong calls from organisations such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International. While the goal of this paper is to provide policy recommendations with a human rights- based approach, the author acknowledges that these recommendations will only be seriously considered by a government that is open to seeing the drug problem as a holistic public policy issue and not a purely criminal issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Problems of Drug Dependence 1996: Proceedings of the 58Th Annual Scientific Meeting the College on Problems of Drug Dependence, Inc
    National Institute on Drug Abuse RESEARCH MONOGRAPH SERIES Problems of Drug Dependence 1996: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Scientific Meeting The College on Problems of Drug Dependence, Inc. 174 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services • National Institutes of Health Problems of Drug Dependence 1996: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Scientific Meeting The College on Problems of Drug Dependence, Inc. Editor: Louis S. Harris, Ph.D. Virginia Commonwealth University NIDA Research Monograph 174 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health National Institute on Drug Abuse 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Robert L. Balster, Ph.D., President Thomas R. Kosten, M.D. Steven G. Holtzman, Ph.D., President-Elect Michael J. Kuhar, Ph.D. Edward M. Sellers, M.D., Ph.D., Past-President Scott E. Lukas, Ph.D. George E. Bigelow, Ph.D., Treasurer Billy R. Martin, Ph.D. Edgar H. Brenner, J.D. A. Thomas McLellan, Ph.D. Leonard Cook, Ph.D. Roy W. Pickens, Ph.D. Linda B. Cottler, Ph.D, M.P.H. Beny J. Primm, M.D. Linda A. Dykstra, Ph.D. Peter H. Reuter, Ph.D. Avram Goldstein, M.D. Sidney H. Schnoll, M.D., Ph.D. Charles W. Gorodetzky, M.D., Ph.D. Charles R. Schuster, Ph.D. John R. Hughes, M.D. James E. Smith, Ph.D. M. Ross Johnson, Ph.D. Maxine L. Stitzer, Ph.D. EXECUTIVE OFFICER Martin W. Adler, Ph.D. SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM COMMITTEE Thomas R. Kosten, Chair Martin W. Adler Maureen E. Bronson Kathryn A. Cunningham Ellen B. Geller M.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for Significance Among Drug Lords And
    Searching for significance among drug lords and death squads: the covert netherworld as invisible incubator for illicit commerce LSE Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/100336/ Version: Published Version Article: McCoy, Alfred W. (2019) Searching for significance among rugd lords and death squads: the covert netherworld as invisible incubator for illicit commerce. Journal of Illicit Economies and Development, 1 (1). pp. 9-22. ISSN 2516-7227 10.31389/jied.8 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ [email protected] https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/ McCoy, AW. 2019. Searching for Significance among Drug Lords and Death Squads: The Covert Netherworld as Invisible Incubator for Illicit Commerce. Journal of Illicit Economies and Development, 1(1), pp. 9–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31389/jied.8 RESEARCH Searching for Significance among Drug Lords and Death Squads: The Covert Netherworld as Invisible Incubator for Illicit Commerce Alfred W. McCoy Department of History, University of Wisconsin-Madison, US [email protected] In a search for appropriate theory, this essay inserts drug trafficking, the world’s largest illicit economic activity, within a wider analytical frame called the ‘covert netherworld.’ Through the convergence of three factors—covert operations, illicit commerce, and social milieu—such neth- erworlds can form at regional, national, and international levels, thereby transforming social margins of crime and illicit commerce into potent sources of political change.
    [Show full text]