Local Party Organizations and the Mobilization of Latino Voters

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Local Party Organizations and the Mobilization of Latino Voters LOCAL PARTY ORGANIZATIONS AND THE MOBILIZATION OF LATINO VOTERS A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Daniel G. Lehman May, 2013 Examining Committee Members: Robin Kolodny, Advisory Chair, Political Science Michael Hagen, Political Science Sandra Suarez, Political Science Rosario Espinal, Sociology i ABSTRACT We frequently hear that Latinos are the fastest growing minority group in the United States. We also know that like many American immigrant groups, Latinos tend to reside in states where a critical mass of their community already is settled, in this case largely for geo-political reasons (e.g. New Mexico, Arizona, California, Texas, Florida and New York). Why, then, is Latino participation in national politics lower than white, Black, and Asian voters? And who has an interest in doing something about it? This project addresses several interrelated questions concerning the place of Latinos in American politics and the health of democracy in the United States. Political parties are meant to link citizens to the state. However, parties often fear that reaching out to certain groups may alienate the concerns of some core voters, providing a disincentive to political parties to prioritize Latino outreach. Here, I ask, to what degree are local political parties involved in mobilizing Latino voters as compared to other voting groups? Interest groups have much narrower constituencies than political parties by definition, but their purpose may not be exclusively, or even primarily, electoral. So, what role do interest groups and community organizations play in getting Latinos to vote? Perhaps parties and interest groups compliment each other’s efforts to mobilize Latinos, so I ask, what relationship do political parties and interest groups develop in the push to mobilize Latino voters? I hypothesize that political parties increase efforts to mobilize Latino communities when these groups of voters are known to be reliable partisan voters and pivotal to winning elections at the local, state, and/or national level. Party organizations are unlikely to target Latino voters when they are few in number and make little difference in ii an election. Second, interest groups and organizations concerned with Latinos issues are going to be more consistent in mobilizing Latino voters whether or not they constitute a significant segment of the population and are pivotal to winning elections at the local, state, and/or national level. To answer these questions, I use several methods to gather data. Between November of 2008 and February 2009, I conducted a mail survey of 217 county political party chairs concerning Latino mobilization in the 2008 Presidential race. The survey was submitted to the chairs of every county political party in the ten states with the highest percentage of Latino population: Arizona, California, Nevada, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, and Texas. Responses were then matched to county census and election data in order to understand the relationship between mobilization activity, county demographics, and partisan identity. What best predicts Latino mobilization? Using a multiple regression model, I found that Latino population size threshold and whether a county resides in a presidential swing state most strongly predict Latino mobilization. The greater the size of the Latino community within a county’s population, the more likely political parties will seek to reach out to Latino voters. The data suggests that the likelihood that local parties made an attempt to mobilize Latino voters more than doubles when the county’s Latino population moves above 25% of the total population. The impact of interest group activity by community organizations also seemed to spur greater party mobilization efforts towards Latinos. Likewise, national political dynamics have a trickle down impact on local Latino communities. County party organizations are more inclined to reach out to Latino voters iii in states where presidential elections are contested and where Latino votes could have an impact on close elections. Lastly, I conducted a qualitative case study to understand how this mobilization operates in practice. I explored strategies taken by several interest groups and community organization leaders in Nevada during the 2010 midterm elections to detail how those groups attempt to reach and mobilize Latinos, and the possible position political parties may fill in Latino communities where interest groups have become important politically in mobilizing voters, and vice versa. The case study reveals that Latino mobilization by parties and interest groups is part of a larger phenomenon in contemporary American elections in which voters are targeted by a partisan network of political actors that employ political parties, partisan interest groups, party and outside spending organization donors, and partisan volunteers. My work parallels and expands Mildred A. Schwartz’s work (1990) on party networks and the complexity of relationships between political parties and interest groups to include how these political actors interact with Latino voters in the United States. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my dissertation committee, Dr. Robin Kolodny, Dr. Michael Hagen, and Dr. Sandra Suarez for all of their insight and support. It has been a pleasure to work with them throughout the writing process. Thanks also to my reader, Dr. Rosario Espinal, for her careful analysis and for her flexibility in reading and responding to this dissertation. Additionally, I would like to thank Dr. Joseph McLaughlin and the Institute for Public Affairs at Temple University along with the Department of Political Science at Temple for their generous support and guidance. Finally, I would like to thank my wife, Erin, who gave me wisdom and encouragement through all the ups and downs. v To George Edward Berkheiser. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................v DEDICATION ................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................x CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1 2. LOCAL PARTY ORGANIZATIONS AND LATINO VOTERS ........................21 3. INTEREST GROUPS AND LATINO MOBILIZATION ....................................53 4. RESEARCH DESIGN AND MULTIVARIATE REGRESSION ........................81 5. CASE STUDY: THE 2010 U.S. CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS IN NEVADA .............................................................................................................108 6. CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................149 REFERENCES CITED ....................................................................................................164 APPENDICES A. PARTY LEADERSHIP SURVEY ......................................................................197 B. SURVEY CHARACTERISTICS ........................................................................200 vii LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. States included in the study, by Pct of Latino Population Statewide .......................27 2. Presidential Two-Party Results, Democratic Candidates 1988-2008 .......................29 3. Survey Response Distribution by State ....................................................................39 4. Mobilization of Latino Voters by Local Party Organizations ..................................43 5. Percentage of Local Party Organizations Targeting Latino Voters ..........................44 6. Local Parties and Campaign Activities by Target Group .........................................45 7. Interest Group Activity by Region............................................................................74 8. Comparisons of Party Organization and Interest Group Mobilization By Region............................................................................................75 9. Local Party and Interest Group Mobilization Across Groups of Voters ..................76 10. Interest Group Activity by Latino County Population..............................................78 11. Distribution of Latino Mobilization Activities by Local Parties ..............................95 12. Local Party Mobilization of Latinos by County Latino Population .........................96 13. Regression of Latino Mobilization by Local Party Organizations ...........................98 14. Regression Comparison ..........................................................................................105 15. Population Figures for Nevada and the United States (1900-2010) .......................114 16. Latino Population Overall in Nevada and Clark County (1980-2010) ...................118 17. County Election Results in Nevada and Latino Population ....................................126 18. Total Spending by Candidates, Outside Groups, and PACs in U.S. 3 rd Congressional Race ...................................................................................129
Recommended publications
  • Libertarian Party of Nevada Hosted "Speed Dating" Events Over 2 Days at Different Venues in Las Vegas
    Endorsement Committee This year, we formed an Endorsement Committee comprised of 18 members plus additional Libertarian leadership; the “Committee.” The Committee members conducted their own independent research on each of the candidates and asked them questions at our events. The Committee members took notes and made recommendations on grades and endorsements. Endorsement Committee Chair: Jason Weinman Committee Members: Jason G Smith Jim Duensing Jason Nellis Lesley Chan John McCormack JD Smith Lou Pombo Brady Bowyer Scott Lafata Tim Hagan Brett H. Pojunis Brandon Ellyson Debra Dedmon Nick Klein Andrew Lea Ross Williams Tarina Dark Steve Brown Format - Why "Speed Dating?" The Libertarian Party of Nevada hosted "Speed Dating" events over 2 days at different venues in Las Vegas. The goal was to meet as many candidates as possible in a format similar to speed dating. LPNevada endorsed Candidates in non‐partisan races and graded Candidates in partisan races for the 2014 General Elections. Most organizations do not get one‐on‐one interaction with the candidates; we felt this is important. Endorsements and Grading Non‐Partisan candidates received either a positive (thumbs up) or negative (thumbs down) endorsement from the Committee. Partisan Candidates received a grade of 1 to 5 stars. Candidates who received 1 star were not very Libertarian and candidates who received 5 stars were very good in regards to their position on issues important to Libertarians. The Libertarian Party of Nevada has the following 15 Candidate on the 2014 Ballot. Adam Sanacore, Assembly District 21 Lou Pombo, Assembly District 37 Chris Dailey, White Pine County Commission Louis Gabriel, Assembly District 32 Donald W.
    [Show full text]
  • Addendum a to Resolution to Reestablish Republican Unity and Principles
    Addendum A to Resolution to Reestablish Republican Unity and Principles Note: This addendum is attached to the Resolution to ensure clarity and justification for the claims and appeals made within the Resolution. Towards Integrity, Then Unity We, the Nevada Republican Central Committee make it known that we delayed presentation and publication of this Resolution until after the 2012 Presidential Election to unmistakably demonstrate support and respect for our Republican candidate. Unlike events at the 2012 Republican National Committee (RNC) Tampa Convention, we demand integrity and sincere unity in Republican Party affairs. The RNC silenced the delegates, and therefore, all Republicans, during the vote to accept the RNC Rules Committee Report, in violation of RNC Rules, specifically, our Preamble. The Preamble of our RNC Rules sets out a clear vision for the Party to function properly. The leadership of the Party exercised exceptionally poor judgment in their decision making, clearly violating that Preamble. As members of the Republican Party it is our duty to take actions necessary to ensure that our Party respects our rules. Specific Grievances 1) The report of the 2012 RNC Convention Rules Committee was not accepted properly. Legitimate cries of “Division” were heard, clearly requiring actions which were not taken (see Rules of the House of Representatives, Rule XX, 1. (a) Voting and Quorum Calls) 2) Therefore, Rule 40 (b) could not have been amended and the original requirement for five states remained the criteria. Considering this and that the RNC Secretary was handed candidate nomination forms in accordance with the rules, there should have been a nomination from the floor.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Hills Republican Women Mission Statement DIRECTORS the Southern Hills Republican Women’S Club Believes in American Exceptionalism
    Volume 7 Issue 4 APRIL 2014 Southern Hills Republican Women Mission Statement DIRECTORS The Southern Hills Republican Women’s Club believes in American exceptionalism. We are President: committed to supporting and advancing the Republican Party, and its candidates, at the local, Lynn Armanino state and national level. To fulfill this mission we will: [email protected] 248-1414 • provide information on current political and community issues, • organize members and coordinate efforts to promote and elect Republican candidates, Interim1st V.P: • maintain our commitment, passion and knowledge in support of the Republican Party and Nickie Diersen conservative issues, [email protected] • influence policy making at all levels of government. 897-4682 2nd V.P: Angela Lin Greenberg- nd [email protected]; Tuesday April 22 269-5557 Guest Speaker Senator Barbara Cegavske Treasurer: Susan Tanksley Candidate for Nevada Secretary of State [email protected] 487-6418 Secretary: Barbara has served for 18 years in our state legislature and has worked very Linda Schlinger hard to enact legislation in support of families and businesses in our great state of [email protected] rd 896-9829 Nevada. She just completed her 3 and final term in our State Senate (District 8) and held the following leadership positions: Senate Minority Whip (2009) and Communications Director: Assistant Senate Minority Leader (2011) along with other chairmanship and Nickie Diersen committee membership positions. [email protected]; 897-4682 Prior to this she served in our State Assembly (District 5) for 6 years and held Events Director: numerous legislative leadership positions including Assistant Assembly Minority Anne Danielson [email protected] Whip (1997) and Assistant Minority Leader (1999 – 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • AUGUST 2017 – the Elephant’S Tale
    C ELEBRATING 52 YEARS • 1965 - 2015 – AUGUST 2017 – The Elephant’s Tale V OLUME 24 • I SSUE 8 Please join us for A Summer Garden Party TUESDAY, AUGUST 8, 2017 With Special Invited Guest Congressman Mark Amodei, Who will be introduced by our Secretary of State, Barbara Cegavske Where: Janet Pahl’s Garden, 1064 Lakeshore Boulevard, Incline Village | 5 to 8 p.m $50 with advance reservation, $55 without Members! This is our last chance this year to reach like - minded women who may have difficulty attending luncheon meetings. PLEASE invite your friends and contacts. Don’t forget to wear your club name badge! PLEASE RSVP to Shirley Appel at [email protected] or by calling (cell) 818 - 266 - 4402 or (home) 775 - 831 - 1505 by FRIDAY, AUGUST 4th AND Mail your check to: IVCBRW, PO BOX 3009, INCLINE VILLAGE, NV 89450 Your check is your reservation! Paid for by Incline Village/Crystal Bay Republican Women. Political contributions are not tax deductible. All solicitations of funds in connection with this event are being made by the Incline Village/Crystal Bay Republican Women and not by Congressman Amodei. Congressman Amodei is seeking only federal permissible funds subject to federal limitations, prohibitions and reporting requirements. Not endorsed by any candidate or candidate’s committee. T HE E LEPHANT ’ S T ALE • A UGUST 2017 with cocktails starting at 5:00 PM and dinner at 6:00 PRESIDENT’S PM. Please make your reservations early. This is the MESSAGE annual “pay in advance” garden party. See the flyer in this newsletter to RSVP.
    [Show full text]
  • POST-ELECTION CASES UPDATED 11/4/20 at 7:00 PM
    VOTING RIGHTS LITIGATION: POST-ELECTION CASES UPDATED 11/4/20 at 7:00 PM CASE ISSUE DEVELOPMENTS PENNSYLVANIA Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Trump campaign claims that state supreme Trump filed a motion to intervene before Boockvar, No. 20-542 (U.S.) court ruling that extended ballot receipt the Supreme Court. deadline to November 6 violates the Elections/Electors Clause. The Supreme Court has ordered a response to be filed by 5pm tomorrow (11/5) In re Canvassing Observation, No. 1094 CD Trump campaign argues that counting Trump campaign appeals ruling by Election 2020 (Commonwealth Ct. of Pa.) should temporarily stop until observers Day judge that denied greater access. A are given greater access to watch the hearing has been scheduled for 7pm on ballot count. 11/4. Contemporaneous coverage of proceedings here: https://twitter.com/broadandmarket/stat us/1323794598951587841?s=21 Hamm v. Boockvar, No. 600 MD 2020 Plaintiffs challenge guidance recently Filed late 11/3. Status conference (Commonwealth Ct. of Pa.) issued by the Secretary of the scheduled for 1:30 Wed 11/4. Commonwealth, arguing that her instruction that county boards of election communicate with voters whose ballots The Voter Protection Program (VPP) is a national nonpartisan initiative promoting election integrity and ensuring safe, fair, and secure elections. Learn more at voterprotectionprogram.org are found to be deficient during the pre- canvass process violates state law. In their view, this process, as well as any process for allowing voters to “cure” their vote with a provisional ballot, violates Pennsylvania law, and they ask the court to enjoin the Secretary from allowing invalidly “cured” ballots to be counted in the vote totals.
    [Show full text]
  • Blues Tribute Poems in Twentieth- and Twenty-First Century American Poetry Emily Rutter
    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2014 Constructions of the Muse: Blues Tribute Poems in Twentieth- and Twenty-First Century American Poetry Emily Rutter Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Rutter, E. (2014). Constructions of the Muse: Blues Tribute Poems in Twentieth- and Twenty-First Century American Poetry (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1136 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONSTRUCTIONS OF THE MUSE: BLUES TRIBUTE POEMS IN TWENTIETH- AND TWENTY-FIRST-CENTURY AMERICAN POETRY A Dissertation Submitted to the McAnulty College of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Emily Ruth Rutter March 2014 Copyright by Emily Ruth Rutter 2014 ii CONSTRUCTIONS OF THE MUSE: BLUES TRIBUTE POEMS IN TWENTIETH- AND TWENTY-FIRST-CENTURY AMERICAN POETRY By Emily Ruth Rutter Approved March 12, 2014 ________________________________ ________________________________ Linda A. Kinnahan Kathy L. Glass Professor of English Associate Professor of English (Committee Chair) (Committee Member) ________________________________ ________________________________ Laura Engel Thomas P. Kinnahan Associate Professor of English Assistant Professor of English (Committee Member) (Committee Member) ________________________________ ________________________________ James Swindal Greg Barnhisel Dean, McAnulty College of Liberal Arts Chair, English Department Professor of Philosophy Associate Professor of English iii ABSTRACT CONSTRUCTIONS OF THE MUSE: BLUES TRIBUTE POEMS IN TWENTIETH- AND TWENTY-FIRST-CENTURY AMERICAN POETRY By Emily Ruth Rutter March 2014 Dissertation supervised by Professor Linda A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network
    PLATFORMS AND OUTSIDERS IN PARTY NETWORKS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE DIGITAL POLITICAL ADVERTISING NETWORK Bridget Barrett A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at the Hussman School of Journalism and Media. Chapel Hill 2020 Approved by: Daniel Kreiss Adam Saffer Adam Sheingate © 2020 Bridget Barrett ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Bridget Barrett: Platforms and Outsiders in Party Networks: The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network (Under the direction of Daniel Kreiss) Scholars seldom examine the companies that campaigns hire to run digital advertising. This thesis presents the first network analysis of relationships between federal political committees (n = 2,077) and the companies they hired for electoral digital political advertising services (n = 1,034) across 13 years (2003–2016) and three election cycles (2008, 2012, and 2016). The network expanded from 333 nodes in 2008 to 2,202 nodes in 2016. In 2012 and 2016, Facebook and Google had the highest normalized betweenness centrality (.34 and .27 in 2012 and .55 and .24 in 2016 respectively). Given their positions in the network, Facebook and Google should be considered consequential members of party networks. Of advertising agencies hired in the 2016 electoral cycle, 23% had no declared political specialization and were hired disproportionately by non-incumbents. The thesis argues their motivations may not be as well-aligned with party goals as those of established political professionals. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES .................................................................................................................... V POLITICAL CONSULTING AND PARTY NETWORKS ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Life Before BCRA: Soft Money at the State Level
    L I F E B E F O R E B C R A S O F T M O N E Y A T T H E S T A T E L E V E L I N T H E 2 0 0 0 & 2 0 0 2 E L E C T I O N C Y C L E S By D E N I S E B A R B E R T H E I N S T I T U T E O N M O N E Y I N S T A T E P O L I T I C S D E C . 1 7 , 2 0 0 3 1 833 NORTH MAIN, SECOND FLOOR • HELENA, MT • 59601 PHONE 406-449-2480 • FAX 406-457-2091 • E-MAIL [email protected] www.followthemoney.org T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S State Parties: Looking for New Dance Partners ........................................3 Summary of Findings...............................................................................5 State-by-State Rankings ...........................................................................7 Who Gives to State Party Committees? ....................................................9 National Committees: State Party Sugar Daddies ................................... 10 Patterns in Giving....................................................................... 11 Transfers and Trading................................................................. 11 Reporting Discrepancies ............................................................. 13 Top Individual Contributors ................................................................... 14 Interstate Trading of Soft Money............................................................ 19 Top Industries ........................................................................................ 21 Tables ........................................................................................................ Table 1: Soft-Money Contributions, 2000 and 2002......................7 Table 2: Types of Contributors to State Party Committees ............9 Table 3: Soft Money from the National Committees ................... 10 Table 4: Top 25 Individual Contributors of Soft Money.............. 16 Table 5: Top 30 Industries Contributing to State Parties.............
    [Show full text]
  • Eget a Head Start on the Holidays & SHOP LOCAL This Season
    Get avery head year, the icy Southwest startand onmuch more! the Head down andholidays find that unique gift this and& so m uchSHOP more! Attendees will LOCALreceive free market takes this place at the Livingstonseason Civic Center. Montana temps and snow cover you’ve been pondering. The Holiday Bazaar is a tote bags while supplies last. Please also bring nonper- Also on Dec. 2nd, the Antique Market will host signal the fast approaching season fundraiser for the Emerson Center. ishable food items to donate to the Gallatin Valley the return of its Holiday Open House of giving. That’s right, it’s time to Also at the Emerson on Nov. 18th, the Bozeman Food Bank. Extravaganza! from 10am–5pm. Come for sales start making those lists, and check- Winter Farmers’ Market moves upstairs for its Looking to early next month, the 2017 SLAM throughout the store, refreshments, and plenty of ing ‘em twice. In prolonged recog- weekly event. Vendors will be displaying their goods Winter Showcase heads to the Masonic Lodge good cheer! This event is meant to wish everyone the nition of “Small Business from 9am–noon. Pick up some groceries, stock the Ballroom Friday and Saturday, December 1st–2nd happiest and healthiest of holidays. Get ready to Saturday,” consider shopping local pantry for Thanksgiving, and get a jump on holiday from noon–8pm both days. With the continued goal wrap and “Come See What Time Left Behind” in when checking names off your holiday shopping shopping with this pre-holiday extravaganza at the to Support Local Artists and Musicians, this holiday Four Corners.
    [Show full text]
  • DCRW Oct 2020
    Douglas County Republican Women AFFILIATED WITH THE NATIONAL FEDERATION OF REPUBLICAN WOMEN www.dcrwnevada.com Volume 25 Issue 10 October 2020 OUR NEXT MEETING WOW what a month we have had in Douglas County! Wed Oct 7, 2020 Probably the most exciting event was the visit by Valley Christian President Trump at the Minden Airport on September Fellowship Church 12, 2020 !! As Bobbi Thompson, Airport Manager, 1681 Lucerne St., stated "it was very fast!" The airport has 48 hours to prepare for President Minden 89423 Trump's visit. There were 28,000 people in venue and approximately 10,000 outside the grounds of the airport. Volunteers stated that people came from sever- Sign In: 11:00 am al states. Senator Settelmeyer opened two of his fields for parking which were Cost $10.00 packed with cars etc. What a great event for Douglas County. Reservation deadline: Now we are gearing up for the upcoming election. As several sources have stated-- this is probably the most important election of our life times!! Oct 2, 2020 I hope you have volunteered at headquarters, help at the Farmer's Market, talked Reservations: to people in the grocery store, walked your precincts and passed along the word of how important this election is for our country!! If you need more information - Linda Colavechio please go to: douglasgop.org 775 782-5338 Stay well and be safe - Brenda [email protected] Without Reservation: COST $15.00 September 12, 2020 Douglas welcomes President Trump PENDING SCHEDULED SPEAKERS (SUBJECT TO CHANGE ) OCTOBER 7TH JAMES SETTLEMEYER NEVADA SENATE 17TH DISTRICT JIM WHEELER NEVADA ASSEMBLY 39TH DISTRICT DISTRICT COURT JUDGE CANDIDATES Caren Cafferata-Jenkins Nathan Tod Young NOVEMBER 4TH JANET FREIXAS NVFRW President VIRGINIA STARRETT AMERICANISM CHAIR DECEMBER 2ND CHRISTMAS PROGRAM DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DIST.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 2:20-Cv-01445-JCM-VCF Document 10 Filed 08/10/20 Page 1 of 24
    Case 2:20-cv-01445-JCM-VCF Document 10 Filed 08/10/20 Page 1 of 24 1 AARON D. FORD, Bar No. 7704 Attorney General 2 GREGORY L. ZUNINO, Bar No. 4805 Deputy Solicitor General 3 CRAIG A. NEWBY, Bar No. 8591 Deputy Solicitor General 4 State of Nevada 100 N. Carson Street 5 Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717 Tel: (775) 684-1237 6 E-mail: [email protected] 7 Attorneys for Barbara Cegavske 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, Case No. 2:20-cv-01445 INC.; REPUBLICAN NATIONAL 11 COMMITTEE; and NEVADA REPUBLICATION PARTY, DEFENDANT SECRETARY OF STATE 12 BARBARA CEGAVSKE’S Plaintiffs, MOTION TO DISMISS 13 vs. 14 BARBARA CEGAVSKE, in her official 15 capacity as Nevada Secretary of State, 16 Defendant. 17 Defendant Barbara Cegavske, in her capacity as Nevada Secretary of State, by and 18 through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General, Gregory L. Zunino, Deputy Solicitor 19 General, Craig Newby, Deputy Solicitor General, hereby moves to dismiss Plaintiffs’ 20 Complaint (ECF No. 1) in its entirety. Dismissal is sought pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the 21 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the ground that Plaintiffs have failed to identify facts 22 demonstrating their standing, and/or the ripeness of their claims, to pursue alleged 23 violations of rights guaranteed by federal law and the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. 24 Constitution. 25 DATED this 10th day of August 2020. Aaron D. Ford AARON D. FORD, Bar No 7704 26 Nevada Attorney General GREGORY L.
    [Show full text]
  • Koch Industries Has Assets in Nevada, Drawn to the State by Natural Resources and Favorable Tax Policies
    KOCH RUSH IN THE SILVER STATE As Elvis might sing, Charles and David Koch “got a whole lot of money that’s ready to burn,” and, not to be outshone by fellow billionaire political donor and Las Vegas Sands Corporation CEO Sheldon Adelson, they’re using their resources to expand the reach of their industrial-political network across the Silver State. Koch Industries has assets in Nevada, drawn to the state by natural resources and favorable tax policies. Politically, The Koch brothers have long had a voice in Nevada through the State Policy Network’s Nevada Policy Research Institute (NPRI), and in recent years have sought to move more aggressively into the increasingly important early primary and swing state. The network’s expansion into Nevada includes partnerships with Adelson’s political team, as well as a new corporate location and extensive electoral work by Koch-funded front groups Americans for Prosperity, Concerned Veterans for America, and the LIBRE Initiative. The Kochs expanded their corporate empire into Nevada with their 2005 purchase of Georgia-Pacific, which maintains a facility in North Las Vegas focused on the manufacture of drywall. The company, whose North Las Vegas facility has spent several recent quarters in violation of the Clean Air Act, was the focus of lawsuits in 2009 when tainted drywall that affected homeowners throughout Nevada and the rest of the country was traced back to Georgia-Pacific, which eventually settled a lawsuit. And in 2014, Koch Business Solutions announced a new Reno facility, coordinated by the Economic Development Authority of Western Nevada, whose method of connecting businesses to state and local tax incentives to attract them to Nevada had been relentlessly attacked as cronyism by the Koch-affiliated NPRI.
    [Show full text]