Table of Contents
Foreword 3
Introduction 4-5
Organisation 6-15
Value added by Agri Wes-Cape 16-26
2013/2014 Agricultural Association affiliation fees 27
2013 Agri Wes-Cape Annual Congress 28
2014 Agri Wes-Cape regional congress resolutions 29-45
Overview of activities 46-84
Affiliates of Agri Wes-Cape 85-89
Awards and competitions 90-95
Acknowledgements 96
List of references 97
Ps 144:3-4
O LORD, what is man that you care for him, the son of man that you think of him?
Man is like a breath; his days are like a fleeting shadow.
2
Foreword
We have again come to the end of a year’s activities at Agri Wes-Cape.
The election is over and new cabinets have been formed. Political interference and the objectives of land reform, which are the main topics of debate in Parliament, create uncertainty for everyone involved in agriculture.
Agriculture is excited about the future because our primary task is to produce food and fibre for a nation as well as for the export market. We want to perform this task with the support of all possible role players.
Agri Wes-Cape is also in discussion with AFASA to establish a provincial ASUF. A draft agreement is being discussed. It is of particular importance to the agricultural sector within our province that organised agriculture’s structures work together closely to facilitate greater unity.
Agricultural conditions again look as promising as they did last year, with a beneficial winter chill and enough water in dams and catchment areas. We hope that Namaqualand, especially Bushmanland and the Karoo region, will also receive their quota of rain.
I wish to extend my sincere thanks to the office staff, as well as everyone who during the past year made a contribution towards organised agriculture in the Western Cape.
Use this document as a handy document to find answers to questions relating to agricultural policy as well as the work that this organisation does for you.
I appreciate everyone’s support.
CJU Swart PRESIDENT: AGRI WES-CAPE
------oooOOOooo------
3
Introduction
Twenty years after democracy: How long before policy-makers realise that the free-market principle is the only basis on which to transform agriculture?
The 2014 election has come and gone. The cards have been shuffled and dealt. Policy-makers have added new role players to their ranks. The separation between state and ruling party has not yet been spelled out clearly so that we know who must do what. Many expectations have been created, which will not be achievable. The last ideological battle between communism/socialism and capitalism has not been fought.
The current impact that labour and strikes have on our fragile economy and the heated debate around land, with 50% having to be given to farm workers, have created expectations that will never be fulfilled, especially in light of the National Development Plan and what is envisaged therein. Furthermore, the national economy is hampered by aging infrastructure that is not being maintained, while power networks and even self-generation of electricity are limited and are inhibiting economic growth.
Is there light at the end of the tunnel? I believe there is, but our attitude regarding specific solutions will determine our success. There is no time for petty differences of opinion and fiddling while Rome burns.
Any country’s agricultural policy influences the population as a whole. Policy that causes costs to soar or impacts on the staple diet of the people, even jeopardising food security, could mean the difference between peace and anarchy.
The new Minister of Agriculture must realise the importance of free-market principles for the economy of a country. Agriculture forms part thereof, so let us make it work.
Agricultural policy should meet the following requirements:
1. The decisions of agricultural producers must be influenced by MARKETS and not by government incentives and control. Producers must respond to market requirements and consumer preferences and they must be in the position to react voluntarily to such needs and preferences.
2. Food affordability is supported by the free market. To what extent do economic policies cause lower-income groups to spend more of their disposable income on food?
3. Subsidies should not be a prerequisite for a producer to produce successfully and to farm profitably. A farming unit must rely on its own merits and enjoy the fruits.
4. Property rights form the cornerstone of the free market. Without this, no economy can operate within a free market. Ownership is the best recipe for economic progress and must be retained at all costs.
5. The review of all legislation that has an impact on agriculture must receive urgent attention. This must take place simultaneously with the roll-out of the National Development Plan.
4
6. With the new dispensation where local authorities, in particular, have a greater say and will exert more influence in future, regulations must be practical and affordable. Unnecessary rules, duplication and even outdated regulations must be replaced.
7. Agricultural research must be stepped up to meet future needs so as to give agriculture a technological edge to enable it to respond timeously to signals from the market place and to meet economic requirements.
8. Free trade must be promoted aggressively. If this is not done, international access to our markets, which has a direct negative impact on local producers, must be urgently identified and addressed. Even where we struggle to market our products, especially in neighbouring countries, and experience strong opposition from trade blocs, the government of the day must do its part to defuse such blockades.
The vision for a free market dispensation in agriculture starts with principles. The principles must address shortcomings, especially government plans and interventions. The current debate, especially around land, water, infrastructure, etc. creates many opportunities for facilitating co- operation with the respective spheres of government and community organisations. Rural areas need our voice and support because only agriculture can ensure that these areas reach their full potential. This includes the fact that joining hands with fellow farmers and their organisations has become more important than ever to convey agriculture’s messages to government and to create a dispensation to the benefit of the country.
CB OPPERMAN CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
------oooOOOooo------
5
Organisation INTRODUCTION
Agri Wes-Cape is a federal organisation with which organisations within agriculture affiliate. Each of the affiliates has an own identity based mainly on that of the primary agricultural producer. The respective organisations serve the general interests, commodity interests or business interests of the primary producer. The highest authority of Agri Wes-Cape is vested in its annual congress.
The annual congress comprises the board of directors, the Executive of each of the three chambers (General Affairs, Commodity and Business Chambers), and the delegates of the respective affiliates affiliated with each chamber. The affiliates of the three chambers within Agri Wes-Cape are as follows: a General Affairs Chamber (with which the agricultural associations, district agricultural associations and the Vroue Landbou-unie are affiliated); an Agricultural Commodity Chamber (with which all the producer organisations, commodity organisations and special associations are affiliated) and an Agricultural Business Chamber (with which all agribusinesses and co-operatives are affiliated). The latter was inactive during the past report year.
When the annual congress is not in session, the board of directors functions as the highest authority of Agri Wes-Cape. Besides the President and Vice President, who are elected by the annual congress, the three chambers each nominate three representatives to serve on the overarching board of directors. In addition, the Agri Wes-Cape constitution makes provision for a maximum of three additional directors to be co-opted.
AGRI WES-CAPE RAAD VAN DIREKTEURE
During the report year, the following persons served as directors:
President CJU (Cornie) Swart
Vice President DJ (Niël) Joubert
General Affairs Chamber DN (Neil) Hamman (Jr) OG (Ockie) Geldenhuys HJ (Johan) Keller
Agricultural Commodity Chamber CJT Krone (Chair) JW (John) Dürr (Vice Chair) R Krige
Agricultural Business Chamber Vacant
Co-option Messrs CJ (Chris) du Toit, JA Loubser and AC Cloete were co-opted as the three additional directors for the report year. 6
The Executive Committee of the board of directors was constituted as follows:
CJU (Cornie) Swart - President DJ (Niël) Joubert - Vice-President DN (Neil) Hamman (Jr) - Chair: General Affairs Chamber CJT Krone - Chair: Commodity Chamber
The Audit Committee was constituted as follows during the report year:
DJ (Niël) Joubert (Chair) - Vice President JW (John) Dürr - Agri Wes-Cape Commodity Chamber OG (Ockie) Geldenhuys - Agri Wes-Cape General Affairs Chamber
Agri Wes-Cape policy committees
The Agri Wes-Cape board of directors appointed six policy committees to advise them on specific policy matters relating to agriculture.
The members of the respective policy committees were as follows during the report year:
Commercial agriculture OG (Ockie) Geldenhuys (Convenor) H (Hugo) de Waal G (George) Kuyler (MPO WC) HW (Hennie) du Plessis JE de V (Viljee) Loubser JA (Kosie) Loubser (Jr) (Young farmer) Liam Viljoen (young farmer)
Natural resources G de V (Gawie) du Bois (Convenor) CJU (Cornie) Swart GJ (Gideon) van Zyl PAC (Piet) Marais AJ Louw J (Johan) Montgomery Dewald van den Berg (Young farmer)
Transformation CJT (Chris) Krone (Convenor: fruit industry) JD (Koos) Jordaan K (Karl) Reitz R (Richard) Krige (GSA Winter rainfall region) JW (John) Dürr (RPO WC)
7
Labour / Social DN (Neil) Hamman (Jr) (Convenor) CJT (Chris) Krone (Fruit industry) R (Roelof) Joubert JJ (Johan) Esterhuyse A (Angus) Williams (Young farmer)
Rural safety U (Uys) van der Westhuijzen (Convenor: co-opted) HJ (Johan) Keller CJU (Cornie) Swart MJ (Thys) Delport (NWGA WC) TDP (Theunis) Smit (Chair, Provincial Stock Theft Committee) WC (Willie) Esterhuizen
Communication and Image-building DJ (Niël) Joubert (Convenor) V (Viljee) Loubser LG van As DN (Neil) Hamman Kevin van Wyk (Young farmer)
Agri Wes-Cape AGRICULTURAL BUSINESS CHAMBER (WESTERN CAPE)
The Agricultural Business Chamber (Western Cape) was dissolved for the purpose of constituting it more inclusively. The Business Chamber within the Western Cape, however, remains inactive.
Agri Wes-Cape AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY CHAMBER
In terms of resolutions adopted and the provisions of Agri SA’s constitution, the Western Cape Agricultural Commodity Chamber’s Executive consists of representatives of the seven biggest agricultural commodities in the Western Cape Province.
During the 2013/2014 report year, the representatives were as follows:
Milk industry: G (George) Kuyler Winter grain industry: R (Richard) Krige Fruit industry: CJT (Chris) Krone (Chair) Wine industry: H (Hendrik) Botha Red meat industry: JW (John) Dürr (Vice Chair) Wool industry: MJ (Thys) Delport Vegetable industry: J (Jan) van Zyl (“SAKO”)
The following three persons serve as the Executive Committee of Agri Wes-Cape’s Commodity Chamber in terms of the provisions of the Agri Wes-Cape constitution.
Chair: CJT Krone Vice Chair: JW (John) Dürr Additional member: R (Richard) Krige
8
The objectives of this Chamber can be summarised as follows:
- To bring together commodity organisations in the Western Cape in order to deliberate on co-ordinated action around matters that affect all the commodities, for example rural development, empowerment, dealing with emerging agriculture and the image of agriculture.
- To communicate a uniform message from the commodities to the public.
- To educate the public regarding primary agriculture, for example the composition of the product price, the income that a producer derives from the consumer’s rand and his/ her contribution to rural development, transformation and food security, all of which forms part of the image of agriculture.
- No overlapping should occur between this structure, which deals with commodity-specific matters, and the General Affairs Chamber which deals with general matters such as water, Eskom, property rates, labour issues, negotiation with government, etc.
- No duplication should take place between commodity organisations, while projects that can be co-ordinated, should be co-ordinated, for example an asset register of all empowerment transactions already completed.
- Agri Wes-Cape is respectful of the fact that the respective commodities have distinctive problems, but appeals to them to avoid any duplication.
- Agri Wes-Cape offers services to the commodity organisation that needs such services, for example negotiation with the authorities, while it also relies on the commodity organisations’ support when deemed necessary.
The focus areas can be summed up as follows:
- The Commodity Chamber must aim to co-ordinate and document empowerment projects so that a complete database of projects can be compiled for the province.
- Commodity organisations are encouraged to support the proposed land audit in the form of a farm-to-farm survey.
- Commodities are requested in the meantime to make any databases they may have available for this purpose.
- A decision must be reached regarding a uniform policy according to which commodities can approach the transformation process, and such policy must be communicated to all affiliates.
9
Agri Wes-Cape GENERAL AFFAIRS CHAMBER
The Executive of the Agri Wes-Cape General Affairs Chamber with which agricultural associations and district agricultural associations are affiliated, was composed as follows during 2013 / 2014:
Chair: DN (Neil) Hamman Vice Chair: OG (Ockie) Geldenhuys
Region 1: GJ (Gideon) van Zyl Region 2: PAC (Piet) Marais Region 3: H (Hugo) de Waal Region 4: AJ Louw Region 5: JE de V (Viljee) Loubser Region 6: R (Roelof) Joubert Region 7: G de V (Gawie) du Bois Region 8: DN (Neil) Hamman Region 9: OG (Ockie) Geldenhuys Region 10: JJ (Johan) Esterhuyse Region 11: J (Johan) Montgomery Region 12: J (Johan) van Dyk Region 13: LG van As Region 14: JN (Koos) Jordaan Region 15: HJ (Johan) Keller Region 16: Karl Reitz Region 17: HW (Hennie) du Plessis Region 18: Willie Esterhuizen Young Farmer Committee: Kosie Loubser (Jr) VLV: Ms Gina Smit
The following persons serve as the Executive Committee of the Agri Wes-Cape General Affairs Chamber in terms of the Agri Wes-Cape constitution:
Chair: DN (Neil) Hamman Vice Chair: OG (Ockie) Geldenhuys Additional member: HJ (Johan) Keller
DISTRICT AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION AND AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATIONS
During the report year, 14 district agricultural associations consisting of 69 agricultural associations and eight junior agricultural associations were affiliated with Agri Wes-Cape. A further 31 agricultural associations were affiliated directly with the Agri Wes-Cape General Affairs Chamber with the approval of the Chamber’s Executive.
The responsibility for co-ordinating the activities of organised agriculture on a district or sub- regional basis rests with the affiliated/ district agricultural associations and directly affiliated agricultural associations, respectively. At local level, agricultural associations play an important role in terms of service delivery to their members and the general activities of Agri Wes-Cape.
Where district agricultural associations and agricultural associations do not function properly, it hampers Agri Wes-Cape’s task to act in the best interests of the Western Cape agricultural 10 community and to attend to matters that affect all concerned. In order to address the shortcomings in the structure and functioning of Agri Wes-Cape, the office bearers and personnel of the organisation attended, and even addressed, a large number of agricultural association meetings during the report year.
The Agri Wes-Cape General Affairs Chamber once again called on agricultural associations to work closely with their district agricultural association and/or their regional representative to ensure liaison with the organisation. The same applied to the directly affiliated agricultural associations, which should liaise very closely with their Agri Wes-Cape regional executive member and the Agri Wes-Cape personnel and become involved in their meetings in order to provide information on Agri Wes-Cape’s activities.
Where agricultural associations experience problems with their administration or functioning, the executive members and personnel of Agri Wes-Cape are available at all times to provide advice and support. We again urged affiliates of the Agri Wes-Cape General Affairs Chamber (agricultural associations, district agricultural associations and even junior agricultural associations) to invite their regional executive member and/or the Agri Wes-Cape chief executive officer to address meetings or to notify them of their meetings so that these persons can, where possible, attend such meetings in an official capacity. It is important to Agri Wes-Cape that a form of personal liaison takes place all the time to provide members of affiliates with first-hand information.
Agri Wes-Cape offers a course for executive members of agricultural and district agricultural association on request. The existing course was recently revised and is presented to the executives of affiliates, with reference to district agricultural associations and agricultural associations. During the past report year the course was again presented to the Grade 10 class of learners (Subject: Agricultural Science) of the Oakdale Agricultural High School, Riversdale.
REGIONAL CONGRESSES
The regional congresses fall under the auspices of the Agri Wes-Cape board of directors, which has delegated chairmanship thereof to the respective Agri Wes-Cape General Affairs Chamber regional representatives. Ten regional congresses were held in March and April 2014 in the following towns: Beaufort West, Laingsburg, Oudtshoorn, Riversdale, Caledon, Worcester, Klipheuwel, Malmesbury, Clanwilliam and Klapmuts.
The ten regional congresses were attended by just over 560 delegates, observers and other interested parties. The presence of younger farmers, women, emerging farmers and farm workers was also significant. It should be mentioned that some agricultural associations failed to attend the series of regional congresses and so-doing missed an opportunity to keep abreast of topical issues in which their organisation is involved. It was encouraging to find that members of junior agricultural associations were in attendance at some of the regional congresses.
Over the past six years the regional congresses have consisted of a closed and open session. During the closed session, Agri Wes-Cape discusses with its affiliates the organisation’s internal matters, including finances, affiliation fees and topical issues affecting agriculture and more specifically organised agriculture. During the open session where role players are present attention is given to matters of general interest. Two regional congresses were held in the afternoon/ evening this year. The regional congresses are also used to allow each of the regions to nominate and elect Agri Wes-Cape’s regional executive members for the term commencing at the upcoming Agri Wes-Cape annual congress.
11
This year attention was given to topical issues regarding the following: National Development Plan, the image of agriculture, SAPS’s Rural Protection Strategy, Agri Wes-Cape’s agricultural association affiliation fee system, wire-fencing along roads, flood damage, shale-gas development, dumping site, property rates, trespassing, predators, infrastructure, Telkom lines, cell phone networks, training, the diesel refund and the affairs of organised agriculture. The resolutions of and discussions at the regional congresses are included elsewhere in this report.
The above-mentioned resolutions adopted at the regional congresses, which deal with a variety of matters, are being attended to by Agri Wes-Cape. These are referred directly to the relevant Agri Wes-Cape policy committees and/or organisation for further attention.
The regional congresses also offered the President and Vice President of Agri Wes-Cape an opportunity to meet personally with many members of the affiliates of organised agriculture at grassroots level. In this regard the Vice President, as chair of the Agri Wes-Cape Audit Committee, provided elucidation on the 2014/2015 Agri Wes-Cape budget, including affiliation fees, which was approved at the 10 regional congresses this year.
Agri Wes-Cape Young Farmer Committee
Preamble
During May 2009 it was decided that an Agri Wes-Cape Young Farmer Committee should be established. The inaugural meeting took place in September 2009 in Worcester. The committee functions as a committee of the Agri Wes-Cape General Affairs Chamber.
Executive
The Chairman and executive members were elected during the inaugural meeting. The Executive consists of one representative each per district municipal area and Metro.
The respective representatives for 2013/2014 were as follows:
Metro: Kosie (JA) Loubser (Jr) (Chair) Overberg: Vacant Cape Wineslands: Angus (AC) Williams Eden: Vacant Central Karoo: Kevin (KJ) van Wyk West Coast: Liam (G) Viljoen
The Chairman also serves in the Agri Wes-Cape General Affairs Chamber Executive. Further provision is made for each of the executive members to serve in the Agri Wes-Cape policy committee of his/ her choice.
Membership of Agri Wes-Cape Young Farmer Committee
All members of affiliated agricultural associations within the servicing area of Agri Wes-Cape -
• where the membership fees of agricultural associations affiliated with the Agri Wes-Cape General Affairs Chamber, were fully paid up;
12
• whose names appear on the membership list of the association which had been provided to Agri Wes-Cape together with payment of affiliation fees; and
• who are aged 35 and younger, were automatically members of the committee.
Objectives
The objectives of the committee in terms of their Household Rules are as follows:
• To strive for and promote the objectives of Agri Wes-Cape in order to attract more young farmers and to retain them within organised agriculture. • To join Agri Wes-Cape in finding solutions to the problems facing agriculture and to do something meaningful in this regard. • To identify the unique problems of young farmers within the Western Cape Province and through appropriate channels seek solutions to these problems. • To develop the leadership potential of young farmers. • To keep a watchful eye on the training of young farmers. • To work with organisations that wish to improve living standards in rural areas, with a view to creating a pleasant environment for young farmers and their families. • To work with Agri Wes-Cape to improve the image of agriculture within and outside the sector; to ensure that commercial agriculture remains sound (profitable and sustainable); that more farmers become involved and that farmers are treated with the necessary respect. • To make a concerted effort to broaden the economic scope for young farmers. • To assist in making organised agriculture more inclusive. • To co-operate with the government in producing food for the population on a sustainable basis. • To ensure that farmers accept full ownership of the agricultural products produced. • To work with the government to ensure the future of the primary and secondary agricultural sector in producing food and fibre on a sustainable basis while at the same time meeting their obligations in terms of conservation and social responsibility. • To make a contribution in empowering and establishing successful and sustainable small-scale farmers in all possible ways. • To do everything possible to promote the objectives of Agri Wes-Cape in general and those of young farmers within the Western Cape in particular.
Annual General Meeting
The Annual General Meeting (AGM) of the Agri Wes-Cape Young Farmer Committee is held annually before the Agri Wes-Cape annual congress. Each agricultural association is entitled to send one representative to the AGM. In addition, the committee invites junior agricultural associations of schools, colleges and universities to send observers to attend the event.
13
The sixth Young Farmer function was held this year on 28 May 2014 at Eensgezind, Durbanville.
FINANCING
Financing structure
It is important to Agri Wes-Cape that a sound financing structure should be in place for the organisation. During the past financial year it has again been possible for Agri Wes-Cape to be self- sustaining and the organisation was largely able to cover its activities from own funds. This is indeed something to be proud of. In this regard, Agri Wes-Cape owes a debt of gratitude, especially to members of agricultural associations that had faithfully paid their membership fees to their agricultural associations, which in turn were able to pay their affiliation fees to Agri Wes- Cape.
Agri Wes-Cape also makes use of an Audit Committee to manage the organisation’s finances on a month-to-month basis and to make recommendations to the board of directors and the respective Executives of the General Affairs Chamber and Commodity Chamber regarding financial matters. A detailed income and expenditure account for each of the structures and sub-structures of the organisation is submitted monthly to the Audit Committee at its meetings. These financial figures are submitted in both abridged detailed format for discussion and approval. In this way the Audit Committee scrutinises the flow of funds on a monthly basis and can make the necessary changes in time.
Agri Wes-Cape is financially sound and has no debt or overdraft accounts. Available funds are, however, so limited that it hampers projects for promoting the image of agriculture, liaison with members and organisational capacity. Since a very small minority (5%) of agricultural associations fail to pay their affiliation fees in full, Agri Wes-Cape finds itself in a situation where it has to consider curtailing certain services.
14
Agri Wes-Cape’s sources of financing
Agri Wes-Cape was funded during the past financial year from the following sources:
• Affiliation fees paid by the Agri Wes-Cape General Affairs Chamber (agricultural associations); • Affiliation fees and project funding received from the Agri Wes-Cape Commodity Chamber (agricultural commodities); • Contributions (project funding) received from agribusinesses; • Dividends; • Donations; • Project donations; • Rental income from the building; • Interest earnings from accumulated funds and investments; • Secretarial fees; and • Voluntary contributions made by irrigation boards / water user associations.
AGRI WES-CAPE PERSONNEL
Personnel within the Agri Wes-Cape structure as such are linked to Agri Wes-Cape, but also provide services to the constituting structures of the board of directors, the six Agri Wes-Cape policy committees of the board, the Agri Wes-Cape Agricultural Commodity Chamber and the Agri Wes-Cape General Affairs Chamber.
Agri Wes-Cape offers a secretarial service to commodities and organisations on request. Services were rendered to the following affiliates and organisations during the past year: • GSA region 26 (Swartland) and region 27 (Southern Cape) executives (terminated on 30 April 2014) • GSA Winter Rainfall Barley Commodity Committee (terminated on 30 April 2014) • GSA Canola Commodity Committee (terminated on 30 April 2014) • GSA Winter Rainfall Research Committee (terminated on 30 April 2014) • Red Meat Producers’ Organisation Western Cape • Cape Pig Producers’ Association • Provincial Stock Theft Committee
The full-time personnel component consisted of the following eight (8) people during the past year:
TABEL 1: AGRI WES-CAPE PERSONEEL
Employee Post Mr Carl Opperman Chief Executive Officer Mr Johan Bothma General Manager Ms Surika Both (untilDecember 2013) Personal Assistant: Chief Executive Officer Ms Johanné Rossouw (from February 2014) Ms Helena van Eeden Personal Assistant: General Manager Ms Porchia Adams (until 31 May 2014) Corporate Communication Manager Ms Alet Wilson Receptionist Ms Shannon Geel Administrative Assistant Ms Lizzy Solomons Office Assistant
15
Value added by Agri Wes-Cape
Agri Wes-Cape’s expertise, dedication and commitment to the agricultural sector in the province extend over more than a century. Since the inception of the organisation many changes have taken place within the agricultural environment and we have succeeded in standing together to address the challenges collectively. The impact of a united front, which is also confirmed in our slogan “Unity in Agriculture” can never be underestimated and when the landscape changes again and we have to contend with new challenges, we must once again, as in the past, join forces and together find solutions to these challenges.
In compiling our code of conduct, agricultural leaders, farmers and role players within the agricultural sector in the Western Cape agreed that the code would be used as guideline to direct and harmonise our work.
In the process we took ownership of the following:
We accept the central role that agriculture plays in the prosperity of our country, our province and all our people;
We understand that our conduct influences the economic growth, natural beauty, social stability and environmental integrity of our province;
We strive to heal the wounds and address the injustices of the past;
We believe that the resources and opportunities that we have should be used to make a positive contribution to the future;
We, as members of Agri Wes-Cape, are committed to accepting responsibility for the consequences of our actions; and
We strive for a positive and constructive vision of the role that agriculture can play in South Africa and in the Western Cape.
Agri Wes-Cape’s structure currently consists of six policy committees of the board, which are constituted to provide our affiliates and their members with a more effective service. The following sets out the value added by each policy committee and we believe that it can make a drastic difference in your business.
Commercial Policy Committee Aim: The Commercial Policy Committee determines, manages and influences the economic and financial impact of legislation, regulations and ordinances on agriculture. It looks at aspects such as economic matters, trade arrangements, infrastructure, local government issues, research and technology.
16
Agri Wes-Cape contact persons for enquiries: Carl Opperman and Johanné Rossouw
Subject Liaison with producers and Progress/ actions/ value added
Diesel refund Agri SA, Department of Regular discussions to maintain and Minerals and Energy Affairs, improve the current rebate on the Treasury purchase of diesel. Negotiations regarding the application of the diesel logbook as required by SARS are currently underway.
Property rates Department of Local Negotiations to ensure that the legislation Government, is agriculture-friendly. Interpretation of municipalities, legal legislation so that municipalities practitioners understand and implement it correctly.
Electricity tariffs NERSA, Department of Presentations, submissions and Minerals and Energy Affairs, appearances in relation to electricity Eskom, Department of tariffs were used to convey agriculture’s public Enterprises, BUSA concerns and interests. Elucidation was and NEDLAC requested on the composition of the tariff structure.
Trade and tariff policy Department of Trade and Collective actions with commodity Industry, ITAC organisations to have a greater impact during negotiations and discussions.
Input costs (fuel, Commodity organisations, Collective actions with commodity chemicals, insurance, input suppliers organisations to have a greater impact etc.) during negotiations and discussions.
Power-saving Eskom, NERSA Negotiation for minimal power outages programmes and prioritisation of agriculture’s load shedding and electricity provision.
Industrial policy Department of trade and Influencing policy to make it agriculture- Industry, portfolio friendly and to add value to the food value committee chain.
Road infrastructure Department of Transport, Discussions with SANRAL and Department Agriculture, district of Transport on the state of roads, with municipalities outcomes conveyed to the Western Cape Ministers of Transport and Agriculture.
Road traffic legislation Department of Transport Ongoing negotiations, clarification and commentary relating to this matter.
Preparedness for natural District municipalities and Agri Wes-Cape works closely with the disasters municipalities provincial and district municipality disaster management divisions, among others to timeously address possible problems relating to natural disasters (floods, snow, drought, earthquakes).
17
Disaster relief Disaster management Identify the extent of the disaster and lead management (provincial, national), the process to have disasters officially Department of Agriculture declared by government. Surveys, process (provincial) for applying for disaster relief.
Railways Spoornet, Department of Meeting with interest groups to discuss Transport options relating to rail freight transport. A pilot project for containerisation to reduce traffic on roads. Predicted that outcomes such as cost chain, cold chain maintenance will be minimalized.
Statistics and censuses Statistics SA and Verified and accurate information and Department of Agriculture statistics to help with effective (national) management of disasters, infrastructure, rural protection, government funding and allocation of funds.
Telecommunication Farmers, Telkom, cell phone Discussion with Telkom and cellular and companies and satellite satellite service providers regarding communication companies service delivery in rural areas, Telkom rolled out certain satellite technology, especially where theft of lines led to suspension of such services.
Labour/ Social Policy Committee Aim: The Labour and Social Policy Committee looks at the relationship between employer and employee within the agricultural environment and the promotion of social and socio-economic well-being.
Agri Wes-Cape contact persons for enquiries: Carl Opperman and Johanné Rossouw
Subject Liaison with producers Progress/ actions/ value added and
Evictions NGOs, trade unions, Stating agriculture’s position, questioning and municipalities, requests for correction of untruths in reports Department of Labour, and agriculture’s public image. Participated in SAPS, Department of endless debates on the matter. Further Justice, Department of amendments to legislation were a possibility. Land Affairs Organised agriculture will have to participate in consultations and negotiations and resist pressure to further curtail the rights of land owners.
18
Agricultural unrest Role players Intense involvement in negotiations, information to affiliates and their members as well as media coverage.
Labour inspections Department of Labour Positive attitude to agriculture and open (provincial) discussions and reports indicate that agriculture meets requirements.
Labour legislation Portfolio Committee on Involved with an information programme to Labour, Department of provide elucidation on farmers’ requirements Labour contained in labour legislation, with the emphasis on compliance.
Labour legislation Affiliates All requirements of existing labour legislation Information are available to agricultural association newsletters members in newsletter format (26 issues) on Agri Wes-Cape’s webpage. Occupational safety Department of Labour Ensure that farmers comply with the statutory requirements relating to occupational safety; contribute to a safe working environment for producer and worker. The image of agriculture which is reflected demonstrates responsibility for and dedication to this important aspect in the workplace.
Employment equity Department of Labour Ensure that producers comply with legislation so as to avoid fines. Submissions to government to convey agriculture’s position.
Child labour Department of Labour, Monitor situation and keep abreast of Agri SA, International developments to ensure a clean audit for the Labour Organisation Western Cape.
Agricultural training Department of Quality and importance of agricultural and farm schools Agriculture, Education, training and education levels in farm schools educators were addressed. Survey on farm schools facilitated by Agri SA – outcomes discussed with the national Department of Education.
Minimum wage Department of Labour, Labour unrest in agriculture and new interim labour consultants sectoral determination adjustments were announced. Participation in the process. Management of the image of agriculture and viability thereof within economic realities. Annual updates of requirements are sent to producers.
19
HIV/ Aids and TB Department of Health, Awareness and management of pandemics and Agriculture, effect that they have on the labour market. municipalities, Release of DVDs. commodity organisations
Farm worker Local farm worker Co-operation with and mouthpiece for farm organisations and organisations, trade workers, with emphasis on farm worker development unions, Department of competitions, development of farm workers. Agriculture (provincial)
Farm worker housing Local municipalities, Discussions to promote the right of farm Ministry of Housing and workers to housing in municipal townships. Agriculture (provincial)
Farm Worker of the Affiliates, sponsors and The competition is currently held in virtually all Year competition Department of Agri Wes-Cape’s regions. The request is that it Agriculture (Western be extended to all 18 regions within the Cape) Western Cape.
Seasonal and migrant Department of Labour, Assistance with the facilitation of valid permits labour policy Home Affairs for migrant workers. Currently stricter application by the Department of Home Affairs: Immigration control.
Transformation Policy Committee
Aim: To influence and implement sustainable transformation in the sector, including the transfer of land to and skills development for new entrants in order to stabilise the agricultural sector and increase its contribution.
Agri Wes-Cape contact persons for enquiries: Carl Opperman and Johanné Rossouw
Subject Liaison with producers and Progress/ actions/ value added
Database of land Department of Agriculture Survey to determine how much ownership transformation has already taken place. Database will prove the true extent of transformation in the province, Co- operation with affiliates is important to determine the actual status of transformation in the province. This project requires the necessary urgency and the co-operation of all farmers to indicate the status of transformation within the Western Cape province.
Willing buyer, willing Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Relevant facts on the matter are seller Development, Land Affairs negotiated and conveyed to role players on a regular basis. Incorrect
20
interpretation is pointed out by departments. Policy document containing organised agriculture’s position was compiled and submitted.
Land reform and Department of Rural Problems with restitution claims are restitution Development and land Reform regularly brought to the attention of and (provincial, national), Land negotiated with the Presidency, the Claims Commission, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Rural Agriculture (provincial), local Development and Land Claims municipalities, NGOs and trade Commissioner. unions
Green Paper on Land Department of Rural Greater involvement in task teams Ownership Development and land Affairs, appointed by the Minister to advise him. BUSA, legal representatives, industrial land owners (mines, banks, etc.)
Establishment and Department of Rural The positive role of existing producers in development of new Development and Land Affairs, relation to promoting transformation is farmers Agriculture, Land Claims made known in order to address the Commissioner, commodity negative perceptions about agriculture organisations and to identify investment opportunities for new farmers with a view to the establishing emerging commercial farmers and to grow agriculture economically in the Western Cape.
Agri Wes-Cape has also identified a need for a database to be compiled and maintained for the respective projects, whether private initiative or state- financed projects, within our province. The co-operation of affiliates and other role players is essential.
Natural Resources Policy Committee Aim: The activities of this committee focus on all policy areas that have a direct and indirect effect on the sustainable use of natural resources in agriculture.
Agri Wes-Cape contact persons for enquiries: Johan Bothma and Johanné Rossouw
Subject Liaison with producers and Progress/ actions/ value added
Climate change and Department of Agriculture, Inputs towards existing structures and biotechnology UCT committees and support for applications development for research projects.
Migrant pests (locusts, Department of Agriculture To liaise with the Department or to gerbils) (national, provincial), establish an organised system for locust control and to make the necessary 21
commodity organisation changes. Gerbils (provincial issue) are addressed in consultation with the provincial Department of Agriculture.
Mineral rights and Department of Mineral and Objections, inputs and representations mineral legislation Energy Affairs, consultants are submitted to government on behalf of producers. Information and legal advice are made available to producers. The position of farmers and negative impact of large-scale mining activities on agriculture and food security are communicated in the public domain. Legal action to confirm the principle of expropriation of mineral rights to allow farmers to claim compensation for loss of mineral rights was unsuccessful.
Transfer of water use Irrigation boards, Department Favourable ruling against the Ministry rights of Water Affairs and Department of Water Affairs. The Appeal Court ruling was also positive.
Disasters such as Department of Agriculture, Identified the magnitude of disasters drought and floods National Treasury, Disaster and led the process of having the Management (national, disasters official declared as such by provincial), municipalities government. Surveys, process for applying for disaster relief. Media coverage to publicise the seriousness of the situation and to gain public sympathy and support.
Damage-causing CapeNature, Department of Draft protocol was provided to role animals Environmental Affairs and players for comment. Waiting for Agriculture, PMF (Predator national norms and standards to resolve Management Forum) differences in application between provinces.
Veld fires District municipalities, Guidelines, preventative measures and Department of Agriculture, insurance conditions for fire-fighting Provincial Disaster associations are forwarded to members. Management Impact of veld fires on the agricultural sector was covered in the media. Process to allocate disaster relief was driven.
Water pollution Commodity organisations, Illegal dumping of sewage monitored municipalities, Department of and the negative impact thereof on Agriculture and Water Affairs agriculture was brought to government’s attention.
Water research Water Research Commission, Research on, among others, the effective Agricultural Research Council, use of water, salination of agricultural Department of Water Affairs land, pollution, etc. Research results made available to the Western Cape
22
agricultural sector.
Water tariffs Department of Water Affairs Representations during negotiation of and Agri SA water tariffs. Draft tariffs made available to relevant Agri Wes-Cape committees and irrigation boards for further inputs before finalisation.
Establishment of water Role players in rural areas Agricultural associations were use associations encouraged to take the initiative to establish such associations in collaboration with role players. Expertise is already available which could be used for this process.
Establishment of Fire Role players in rural areas If such an association does not already Protection Associations exist, agricultural associations were requested to take the initiative together with the head of the Fire brigade at the district agricultural association to establish a fire-fighting association (FFA). Full details are available on request.
Rural Safety Policy Committee
Aim: The Rural Safety Policy Committee focuses on all policy areas that have an influence on the safety of the farming community as a whole, as well as the effective functioning of the Rural Protection Plan, including sector policing and crime fighting.
Agri Wes-Cape contact persons for enquiries: Johan Bothma and Johanné Rossouw
Subject Liaison with producers and Progress/ actions/ value added
Agri Securitas Trust Agri SA Facilitate affiliates’ requests for rural Fund protection projects. Successful funding and implementation of requests.
The role and SAPS, district agricultural Draft SAPS reservist policy to promote rural involvement of associations, agricultural protection and to encourage greater reservists associations involvement by farmers and farm workers, remains outstanding.
Trade in scrap SAPS, Telkom, NFTCCC, BAC, Respond swiftly to complaints of theft in material and second- district agricultural agricultural areas to combat crime. New hand goods associations, agricultural legislation introduced for better control. associations SAPS envisages information meetings to provide elucidation in the provisions of the legislation.
23
Crime SAPS Ongoing actions in collaboration with SAPS to safeguard rural areas. Agri Wes-Cape makes a leading contribution to improve SAPS effectiveness and service delivery in rural areas. Two-way communication and flow of information around crime-related matters will help to combat crime.
Illegal immigrants Department of Home Affairs Work with agricultural associations to (Immigration control) facilitate work permits for immigrants in agricultural areas.
Farm attacks and SAPS, district agricultural Close contact with SAPS and distribute incidents associations, agricultural information to make farmers aware of and associations prepared for farm attacks. Constantly encouraging involvement and participation in structures on an organised basis.
Sector policing SAPS, Agri SA, district Involved in the formulation of provincial agricultural associations, implementation plans, The SAPS Rural agricultural associations Protection Plan’s implementation guidelines are currently being rolled out by SAPS in rural areas.
Livestock and fruit SAPS Stock Theft Units, Provincial Stock Theft Committee theft Correctional Services, NPA, established to collectively address and Directorate Veterinary resolve problems and obstacles relating to Services, SAFLA stock theft. municipalities, SAMIC, Provincial traffic services, agricultural associations
Communication and Image-building Policy Committee
Aim: The Communication and Image-building Policy Committee focuses on all policy areas that have an influence on the effective functioning of Agri Wes-Cape’s internal and external communication. The overarching image of agriculture in the Western Cape is protected through the actions of this committee and promoted by means of positive media coverage, networking opportunities and interest group relationships.
Agri Wes-Cape contact person for enquiries: Porchia Adams and Carl Opperman
Subject Liaison with producers and Progress/ actions/ value added
Image of agriculture Private service provider Intensive, comprehensive action plan to maintain and improve the public image and the value of agriculture is currently being developed.
Agricultural Different role players Participation in competitions creates good competitions (farm opportunities to market agriculture. worker, women 24
farmer, farmer, emerging farmer, young farmer, etc.)
Media liaison Agricultural, mainstream and Increasing media coverage and greater regional print media. interest in agriculture-related matter, especially on the part of the mainstream TV, radio and e-media media. Positive feedback from members (internet) and the public around media reports, especially radio and TV.
Perception studies Different role players The purpose of these studies is to obtain information on specific issues such as the image of agriculture. The information is then used to compile strategies to change negative perceptions into positive thinking/ perceptions.
Liaison with political Provincial and national To build good relationships and exchange and industry leaders government leaders and information that is of interest to Wes-Cape officials as well as industry members. These networking relationships leaders accelerate the flow of important information to members and enables Agri Wes-Cape to respond quicker to requests from government and industry leaders.
Shows (participation Organisers of the show, Improving the image of agriculture; and attendance) media, Agri Wes-Cape marketing agriculture as a profession; members recruiting potential members; networking with interest groups.
Improved Members, interest groups, E-newsletter to keep members informed on communication and general public a regular basis of important decisions and image-building events. Identification of potential threat to strategies agriculture’s image and timely intervention to manage it.
Webpage, Facebook, General public Increasing interest is webpage. Facebook Twitter and Twitter progressing well – the idea is to have debates on core issues (such as agricultural unrest).
Administration
Agri Wes-Cape contact person for enquiries: Member administration – Helena van Eeden
Subject Progress/ actions
General administration Administrative work in respect of creditors, debtors, regional congresses, the Agri Wes-Cape annual congress, ongoing enquiries from members, the public and media.
25
Expertise in organised Expertise in respect of legal issues, legislation, infrastructure, human structures resources, economic matters, international issues, research, etc. is sourced by Agri Wes-Cape, Agri SA, commodity organisations, universities, consultants, etc. To the benefit of Agri Wes-Cape members.
Member administration Maintaining member information on email, cell phone and debtor databases; ongoing liaison with chairmen, secretaries and treasuries of agricultural associations in relation to the status of membership fees, the issuance of invoices for membership fees via land mail and e- mail; the handling of enquiries from all sides.
Organisational
Agri Wes-Cape contact person for enquiries: Carl Opperman and Johan Bothma
Subject Progress/ actions Constitutions Support to agricultural associations, district organisations and commodity organisations in respect of the drafting and interpretation of constitutions. New action was launched where affiliates provide Agri Wes-Cape with copies of their constitutions. Providing information Agri Wes-Cape Executive attends a variety of appropriate agricultural (information meetings, association meetings, regional congresses, information sessions regional and annual (minimum wage), etc. and shares relevant information with affiliates congresses) and their members. Young Farmer Committee The development of young farmers in the province will, among others, ensure continuity in organised agriculture’s structures, but will also offer a platform to address the needs of the new generation in terms of agricultural issues.
Courses/ training Courses are presented on request to the executives of agricultural associations and district agricultural associations. During the past three years, a course on Organised Agriculture was successfully presented to the Grade 10 agricultural science class of Oakdale Agricultural High School in Riversdale. Secretariats Secretariats provided for RPO Western Cape, GSA Winter Rainfall regions 26 & 27 (Swartland and Southern Cape), GSA Research Committee, GSA Canola Committee, GSA Barley Committee, PNS Canola/Lupin Working Group, Provincial Stock Theft Committee and Cape Pig Producers’ Association. Representation in organised Wesgro, BAC, Agri SA policy committees, CPACs, foreign delegations, structures priority committees: Rural Safety, Disaster Management Committees, Ministries of state departments.
26
2013/2014 Agricultural association affiliation fees
Over the past ten years, Agri Wes-Cape’s budget and the affiliation fees of agricultural associations and district agricultural associations were submitted to and discussed at the organisation’s regional congresses. Affiliates were informed that Agri Wes-Cape was financially sound and that the organisation was fully funded by its affiliates.
The system of affiliation fees for agricultural associations, which was for the first time implemented in 2006/2007, is based on an assessment per agricultural association. This method will remain unchanged for the 2014/2015 financial year. We believe that during the past nine years a good basis was established according to which the system can be applied to everyone’s satisfaction. Requests have been received, however, that the basis of assessment should be reviewed. An opportunity will be created during the annual general meeting of Agri Wes-Cape General Affairs Chamber to discuss the current affiliation fee system with agricultural association executives and to consider possible amendments.
The Agri Wes-Cape General Affairs Chamber Executive’s recommendation was that the 2014/15 affiliation fee assessment per agricultural association should be adjusted by between 4 % on the prior year assessment or 10 % on the amount received for 2013/2014. It now seems clear that the system has started to bear fruit and agricultural associations have accepted the challenge to make it work since more than 95% of the account amounts issued were settled. The role and inputs of Agri Wes-Cape during the 2012/2013 labour unrest served as an example of how an effective organisation prioritises the interests of its members and enjoys the support it deserves.
We also wish to use this opportunity to thank the agricultural associations for their co-operation and inputs in applying the system. Agribusinesses partly assisted with the collection of agricultural association affiliation fees and we thank them for the important role they played in this regard. We also wish to thank those associations that took the initiative to develop distinctive bases for the collection of membership fees.
------oooOOOooo------
27
2013 Agri Wes-Cape Annual congress
The theme of the 2013 Agri Wes-Cape annual congress was: “AGRICULTURE SHIFTS FORWARD”.
The speakers at the event were as follows:
Prof. W Breytenbach – The Political Factors
Mr N Dicey – The consumer scene
Mr M Schüssler – Economic reality of agriculture
Mr J Möller – Shift to be successful within the current game pattern
The following people were names as winners in the respective competitions:
Young farmer Hannes Toua Best stock theft member S/DO(V) EH Mentoor Best stock theft unit Oudtshoorn Stock Theft Unit Best SAPS cluster: Sector policing in the Western Cape: Ladismith
This year no competition was held to select the best district agricultural association and agricultural association. The request was that the format of the respective competitions be adjusted.
The 2012/2013 Agri Wes-Cape annual report was submitted to and approved by the congress.
Messrs CJU (Cornie) Swart and DN (Niël) Joubert were re-elected as President and Vice President respectively.
28
2014 AGRI WES-CAPE REGIONAL CONGRESS RESOLUTIONS
1. OUDTSHOORN regional congress
1.1 Gouritz CMA
The meeting noted that
- the Department of Water Affairs had made Gauritz catchment management area(CMA) part of a greater CMA, namely the Breë River Gouritz CMA;
- the Little Karoo area had not been consulted and informed in advance by the Department regarding the merging of the two CMAs;
- it seemed that the expanded CMA would mean that the cost of agricultural water will hamper and adversely impact on the agricultural sector; and
- the region intended to raise the matter with the Department and Ministry of Water Affairs.
1.2 National Development Plan (NDP) / Infrastructure
The meeting noted that
- besides the overarching development plan for South Africa, very few particulars thereof in regional context, with reference to the role and contributions, were currently available;
- the question was posed as to what the region’s role and contribution should be to make the plan work;
- the plan refers to the agricultural sector in one chapter, but also indicates that it is not available up to regional level;
- Agri Wes-Cape intended to centre the 2014 Agri Wes-Cape regional congresses around the plan at regional level, but had to abandon this as very little / no data was available; and
- it currently seems as if implementation of the plan could be problematic.
During the discussion that followed, the meeting noted that Prof. Mohammed Karaan had made the following input relating to the NDP and agriculture at the ASUF (Agricultural Sector Unity Forum) conference:
29
Agriculture’s first role is to nurture the sole of society
“What role can ASUF and NPC play:
1. Fix land reform (people need land for various reasons) - We need to transfer at least 20% of land now
2. Secure water (Agriculture is at the moment apportioned 55% to 60% of the water reserves) a. We lose too much water and if we save, we can at least increase irrigateable land by a third b. Look at new technology for our future and our kids
3. Fix bantustan problem a. Homeland farmland must be brought into production b. Tenure security
4. Agricultural policy a. The government need our inputs, we must lobby them, i.e. Trade, Black spot b. Cannot be in crisis mode all the time c. Do not meddle with the market
5. Agriculture research a. We need quality research b. Leave incremental research c. Get the right people d. Look after the PhD people
6. Agriculture colleges a. More applications than places available b. Shortage of technical skills to manage farms c. Re-develop the colleges and fix those that can still be fixed
7. No future for the country is there is no place for white commercial farmers. a. Black farmers must be pragmatic b. Black farmers must not grab everything c. Find a person who had proved that he/ she has the ability to farm, and not vice versa
8. Review agricultural institution. a. Do we need the agricultural research council (ARC) in its present form? b. Is the Land Bank doing what it should be doing? c. All public, private as well as commodities should be reviewed to see whether they are still on track
9. ASUF unity must now be taken further – from the bottom to the top and not the other way around. Strive for unity.
30
10. Be careful of: a. Opportunism b. Favouritism c. Incompetence d. Constructive ways to move mistrust e. Beware of domination f. Don’t meddle with politics.”
1.3 Land claims
The meeting was informed that-
- it was envisaged that curatorship should be used as expropriation instrument and farmers were warned of this;
- Agri SA had adopted a firm stance against this and recommended that consideration instead be given to other instruments that can be used for this purpose;
- processing of new land claims was limited to a six-month period and would be assigned to an independent party (internal auditors and legal practitioners) which can deal with it more effectively than the state;
- Agri SA had conducted an exploratory meeting with the Khoisan which would soon be followed up;
- new legislation (pertaining to investments) represents a furtive form of expropriation of all assets and asset classes, which in fact is amounts to total expropriation of all assets; and
- Agri SA was seeking a senior legal opinion in this regard because it was in principle unacceptable in its current form;
1.4 Shale gas
During the discussion relating to shale-gas development, the meeting noted -
- the demand that the relevant companies undertaking the development should in advance give the necessary guarantee to the effect that should mistakes/ pollution take place, the environment would be fully restored at their own cost; and
- that all areas that may be affected were included in this and not only those areas where shale-gas development takes place;
- that Agri SA had stated as a point of departure that a code of best practice be compiled for all companies and signed by them before any exploration commences; and
- that all possible measures were being put in place to protect the agricultural sector and rural areas. 31
1.5 Flood damage 2006/2007
The meeting noted that
- the flood damage of 2006/2007 had been recognised as a disaster and that an amount of R53 million had been promised for this purpose; however, nothing had been received to date;
- enquiries as to when payments can be expected have also produced nothing;
- farmers, as tax payers, make their contributions, and that recognised flood damage having to be covered from own pocket was deemed unfair; and
- enquiries would be addressed to Agri SA.
1.6 Image of agriculture
Note was taken of a request from Mr Laubscher Coetzee that an effective action be launched to improve the image of the agricultural sector given the negative reports about the sector in the media. The agricultural sector would prefer that exposure be given to the positive contribution made by farmers in rural and farming communities.
1.7 Water tariffs: Calitzdorp
The meeting took note of the request by Calitzdorp agricultural association regarding high water tariffs currently applicable in their areas where they pay 0,19c/m3 to the CMA and 0,951c/m3 to the Department of Water Affairs, and a request addressed to Agri SA for clarification regarding these excessive tariffs.
2. BEAUFORT WEST regional congress
2.1 Future of the local office
2.1.1 Request:
The congress requests Agri Wes-Cape to seriously consider splitting the annual amount at which the district agricultural association of Beaufort West is assessed into two so that one half can be used for future operations of the local office, Agri Central Karoo.
2.1.2 Answer:
During discussion of the request, it was noted that
- the full-time secretariat was able to provide a more inclusive and satisfactory service to the area than was the case with the former part-time secretariat;
- the current secretariat places a financial burden on farmers; 32
- the assumption is made that the current secretariat had “taken over” part of Agri Wes-Cape’s activities and was therefore entitled to part of Agri Wes-Cape affiliation fee assessment; and
- on closer inspection, the tasks and functions of the current secretariat entails a more inclusive service in terms of the objectives of the district agricultural association.
In general, note was taken of the following:
- Initiatives were considered to attract more agricultural association members.
- The question must be posed: what is wrong with the existing dispensation? What would be “right” and “what are the minimal principles that should apply”?
- With the establishment of Agri Central Karoo, the district agricultural associations of Beaufort West, Murraysburg and Koup were approached to form part thereof. Only Beaufort West currently makes use of the service.
- The environment within which farmers find themselves has changed from a situation where commercial small stock production makes place for other commodity branches and life style farming, while the surface area has remained the same and must be serviced as needed.
- It also seems that a clear distinction should be made regarding tasks and functions within organised agriculture (role clarification) with reference to agricultural associations, district agricultural associations and Agri Wes-cape, because each has its own cost structure to which farmers contribute voluntarily at grassroots level.
- After the 2014 regional congresses, Agri Wes-Cape intends to hold meetings with all agricultural associations and district agricultural associations, where it will, together with the Agri Wes-Cape board of directors and the Executive of the General Affairs Chamber, attend to role clarification and the current affiliation fee system and make proposals regarding possible adjustments.
2.1.3 Resolution:
The meeting resolved that the request be discussed and dealt with at the planned Agri Wes-Cape meeting with agricultural associations / district agricultural associations.
33
2.2 Agri Wes-Cape membership base
2.2.1 Discussion:
The congress discussed the current format whereby membership fees are collected with due regard to the fairness and adaptability thereof.
2.2.2 Answer:
It was noted that the aspects of the current format with reference to fairness and adaptability thereof would be submitted to and discussed at the planned Agri Wes-Cape meeting with agricultural associations / district agricultural associations.
2.3 SAPS rural safety problem: Cross-border rural areas
2.3.1 Request:
The congress requested Agri Wes-Cape to
* assist with a negotiation process between the provincial SAPS units of the Western and Eastern Cape provinces in order to expedite implementation of the SAPS Rural Protection Plan for cross-border rural areas;
* provide farmers who join as SAPS reservists with training when the new SAPS reservist policy takes effect.
* obtain particulars of how / where / when the format of the training will be decided.
2.3.2 Answer:
The request will be submitted to Agri SA for attention.
2.4 Regional congress registration fee
2.4.1 Discussion:
The congress took note of the request that agricultural associations consider changing the current system of an amount per member to an amount per agricultural association.
2.4.2 Answer:
The congress resolved, after discussion, that the district agricultural associations, together with their agricultural associations, should consider the request and that their proposal as well as the amount concerned be provided to the Agri Wes-Cape regional executive member after the next district agricultural association meeting.
34
3. LAINGSBURG regional congress
3.1 Agri Wes-Cape agricultural association affiliation fee assessment
3.1.1 Discussion:
The congress discussed the Agri Wes-Cape agricultural association affiliation fee assessment.
3.1.2 Answer:
Based on the discussion, it was noted that Agri Wes-Cape planned to convene a meeting with representatives of the agricultural associations / district agricultural associations after the 2014 regional congresses to discuss the system of affiliation fee assessments and to consider proposals to improve the system.
3.2 Wire-fencing along provincial roads
3.2.1 Discussion:
The congress discussed the maintenance of wire-fencing along provincial roads.
3.2.2 Answer:
Noted that
- the Fencing Act (Act No. 63 of 1963) stipulates that land owners on either side to a boundary fence have a 50:50 liability for the costs relating to the erection/ maintenance of fences;
- the Western Cape Province had reviewed its fencing policy and that district municipalities served as implementing agents for this purpose;
- the provincial fencing policy contains specifications as to the allocation of funding and that the district municipality must annually apply for funds and make the necessary provision within a limited budget;
- the district municipality must before 1 July submit to the province their budget for maintenance and erection of wire-fencing on a priority basis;
- the problem experienced with the policy is the ineffective implementation thereof by the district municipality;
- the respective agricultural associations/ district agricultural associations should list the problem areas in terms of wire-fencing 35
and submit such list annually when the municipal IDP was compiled, and also ensure that copies thereof are submitted to the district municipality and even the district road engineer (of the province) so that it can be included in the priority list and budget.
Emanating from the subsequent discussion, it was noted that
- the Department of Agriculture (Western Cape) undertook wire- fencing projects in the Rietbron area using job-creation funds;
- agricultural associations should submit such needs via Agri Wes-Cape to the Western Cape Department of Agriculture’s Land Care division in order to be considered for inclusion on the priority list for the programme.
3.3 Flood damage
3.3.1 Discussion:
The congress discussed the flood damage caused to road infrastructure in January 2014.
3.3.2 Answer:
Noted that the district municipality responded as follows:
- The following roads were identified, a list of which was submitted to the province for contract-based repairs:
* Moordenaars-Karoo: Structures and earthworks; * Ladismith tarred road just outside; * Kareebome road, which includes the road through Buffels River; and * Koup station road.
- The district municipality was aware that it would take long to restore the said roads, especially because permission had to be obtained from the Department of Environmental Affairs to legally acquire gravel quarries with quality material for the repairs;
- With regard to general maintenance of gravel roads, the district municipality’s capacity (funding, equipment and manpower) was too limited to re-gravel sufficient kilometres per year; and
- The province did not readily award re-gravelling contracts in Karoo areas because of, among others, the low traffic pressure, which in turn contributed to the deterioration thereof.
36
3.4 Shale gas
Mr Dean Gouws of the Agri Central Karoo/ Beaufort West district agricultural association office briefly provided elucidation in this regard. The central message to agricultural associations was to become involved in order to protect the interests of farmers and the rural communities.
3.5 Renewal of firearm licences
SAPS had asked farmers to ensure that applications for the renewal of firearms are submitted in time as it seemed that this was not currently the case.
3.6 Roadworthiness testing for tractors
According to the Department of Transport, agricultural implements, including tractors, are not subject to weighbridge and roadworthiness testing. If the registration authorities apply a different interpretation, the Provincial Helpline (0860 212414) can be consulted.
3.7 Agri Wes-Cape affiliation fee system and finances
The regional congress asked that Agri Wes-Cape should again, per e-mail, provide affiliates with concise particulars regarding Agri Wes-Cape’s affiliation fee system and finances.
3.8 Attendance of Agri Wes-Cape regional congresses in the Karoo areas
The meeting took note of the request that in the light of poor attendance by agricultural association members, the district agricultural associations (Beaufort West, Murraysburg and Koup) should consider convening one regional congress for the three district agricultural associations, rotating among Beaufort West, Prince Albert and Laingsburg.
The congress resolved that the three district agricultural associations should consider the request and report back to their Agri Wes-Cape regional executive members.
4. PHILADELPHIA regional congress
4.1 City Cape Town’s new dumping site
4.1.1 Request:
The congress requested Agri Wes-Cape to support the association in their action against the allocation and location of a new dumping site (Philadelphia agricultural association).
37
4.1.2 Discussion:
To summarise the discussion: the agricultural association undertook to provide Agri Wes-Cape with full particulars so that the matter can be raised with City Cape Town to secure their support.
4.2 Trespassing on Philippi agricultural land
4.2.1 Request:
The congress asked Agri Wes-Cape to become involved as SAPS Philippi had failed to arrest the trespassers where complaints had been lodged.
4.2.2 Answer:
The meeting noted that
- SAPS had issued a National Instruction to all SAPS stations to immediately arrest trespassers and bring them before the court when trespassing charges are laid;
- the guidelines for implementation of the Strategic Plan for Rural Protection, clearly state in item 5.2, paragraph 8 that:
“Trespassers must be arrested as soon as possible by members of the South African Police Service as soon as a complaint of trespassing was lodged and must be brought before a court”; and
- in the same paragraph also indicates that land owners or the person in control of the property must immediately lay a trespassing charge with SAPS before SAPS will take any action.
Agri Wes-Cape undertook to address the request directly to the SAPS Provincial Commissioner.
5. RIVERSDALE regional congress
5.1 District roads:
5.1.1 Request:
The congress requested that
- a representative of the Eden district municipality conduct an inspection of district roads in conjunction with a delegation of each agricultural association in order to visit critical cases and so that the matter can be urgently addressed; and
38
- the Eden district municipality (within Hessequa municipality) provide elucidation and/or information to the Riversdale district agricultural association regarding the programme of normal grading and re- gravelling of roads and the repair of bridges and that the necessary provision be made within the budget.
5.1.2 Answer:
The meeting noted that
- agricultural associations were responsible for reporting problems around road infrastructure when the municipal IDP was compiled and for ensuring that these are included in the priority list for repairs and maintenance; and
- the Department of Transport (Roads division) annually publishes in the provincial gazette a detailed list in order of priority for the repair and maintenance of roads over more than one budget year.
5.2 Predators:
5.2.1 Request:
The congress discussed the problem around predators and requested that:
- CapeNature (leopards) and game farm owners be involved to give their co-operation in managing these problems; and
- the Department of Agriculture of the Western Cape appoint hunters to deal with the problems experienced with caracal and black-backed jackal.
5.2.2 Answer:
The meeting noted that
- the Predator Management Farm had been established to manage problem animals;
- in terms of the legislation, land owners can individually obtain a three-month permit from CapeNature to manage caracal and black- backed jackal on their property;
- the Predator Management Farm had negotiated a protocol for the management of problem animals with Cape Nature where an agricultural association/ district agricultural association can, on behalf of its group of members who had consented, acquire a one- year permit for managing problem animals and in exchange for this would provide CapeNature with detailed feedback on damage caused by predators and the numbers killed;
39
- full details about the Predator Management Farm protocol had already been provided to all agricultural associations on more than one occasion; and
- some associations present objected to the administrative burden that the protocol places on them.
5.3 Drought relief
5.3.1 Discussion:
The meeting took note of and thanked the farmers who had donated feed as well as cash to fellow farmers in the drought-stricken areas of the Northern Cape and North West provinces.
5.4 Training for labourers
5.4.1 Request:
The congress requested Agri Wes-Cape to assume the lead in the form of appropriate training at farm and district level to ensure that in the modern era of agricultural equipment and the use thereof at farm level, labour (skilled and unskilled) met all the necessary requirements.
5.4.2 Answer:
Agri Wes-Cape undertook once again to compile and provide agricultural associations with all existing agricultural training courses and institutions.
5.5 Theft of Telkom lines
5.5.1 Request:
In light of the magnitude of the theft of Telkom cables, the congress once again requested Telkom to
- constantly maintain basic services;
- give high priority to repairs where Telkom lines become defective, especially over weekends/ holidays; and
- replace cables where theft had occurred as soon as possible.
5.5.2 Answer:
The congress noted that Agri Wes-Cape would relay the region’s request to Telkom, but heard that with regard to the widespread nature of Telkom cable theft, Telkom had repeatedly indicated that lines would not be replaced in all instances and that satellite telephone technology would instead be used.
40
5.6 Cell phone networks
5.6.1 Request:
The congress asked that Agri Wes-Cape should request cell phone service providers (MTN / Vodacom and others) to expand their services in rural areas.
5.6.2 Answer:
It was noted that
- according to information received, cellular service providers have currently suspended all expansion of their services in light of government pressure to reduce the cost of cell phone services; and
- Agri Wes-Cape would consider dealing with the problem via other channels, such as the PSO 11 (Provincial Strategic Objective).
6. CALEDON regional congress
6.1 Relationship between SAPS Rural Protection and organised agriculture
6.1.1 Discussion:
The congress was referred to the good relationship forged between SAPS and organised agriculture to ensure that SAPS’s Rural Protection Strategy is successfully implemented in rural areas.
6.2 Cell phone reception in region 12
6.2.1 Request:
The congress asked Agri Wes-Cape to be of assistance by supporting local requests to identify, investigate and address problems in areas where no cell phone reception is available.
6.2.2 Answer:
The congress noted that according to available information, cellular service providers have currently suspended all expansion of their services in light of government pressure to reduce the cost of cell phone services.
6.3 Diesel refund
6.3.1 Discussion:
Congress was requested to ensure that their members provide all the required basic information on agricultural diesel in order to be able to deal with enquiries made by SARS in this regard. 41
6.4 Feed donations
6.4.1 Discussion:
Congress accepted a motion of thanks to farmers who had responded to the recent call for feed donations as well as cash contributions to fellow farmers in the Northern Cape and North West province.
6.5 Permits for agricultural equipment on public roads
6.5.1 Request:
Congress asked Agri Wes-Cape to address representations to the Department of Transport to make the current system according to which permits are applied for more user-friendly by considering the following:
- That applicants may apply per telephone, followed by an electronic/email request to the department, after which the permit is issued at the nearest regional office of Provincial Traffic; and
- That flexibility be built into the system where, depending on agricultural conditions, more than one day is allowed to move agricultural equipment on or along public roads.
6.5.2 Answer:
Agri Wes-Cape undertook to refer the request to the Department of Transport and to take it further from there.
6.6 Agri Wes-Cape land audit survey
The congress noted that
- the response of farmers to the request that they participate in the Agri Wes- Cape land audit and to provide their particulars had not been satisfactory to date; and
- Agri Wes-Cape had asked that those members who had in fact made the effort be thanked and that they be acknowledged for their participation.
7. MALMESBURY regional congress
7.1 Drought donations
The meeting noted that
- many problems were being experienced in moving feed donations to the drought-stricken areas;
42
- since the feed also formed part of farmers’ “money”, urgent plans should be devised to distribute it to the afflicted areas.
7.2 Diesel theft
The meeting noted that a firm stance was adopted against farmers who deal unlawfully with agricultural diesel and asked that a helpline be established where anonymous complaints can be lodged.
7.3 Wind-chargers and Eskom
The meeting took note of the request that Eskom be approach to enquire what contributions each of the wind farms in the province made to the Eskom network and resolved that Eskom would be questioned in this regard.
7.4 Water
The meeting noted that
- the pollution of rivers should receive more attention because farmers suffered losses when their products were not acceptable to the consumer as a result of this; and
- instances of water theft, among others, by farmers, should also be addressed and exposed.
7.5 Agri Wes-Cape land audit
The meeting noted
- the lack of participation by farmers in the land audit; and
- that agricultural associations were requested to co-operate in their own interest.
7.6 Chemical products
The meeting took note of the fact that smaller agricultural commodities find it difficult to register chemical products for use on farm crops and resolved that the matter be referred to the Agri Wes-Cape Commodity Chamber Executive for further attention.
7.7 Motion of condolence
The meeting accepted a motion of condolence on the passing of Mr Corwyn Botha.
43
8. CLANWILLIAM regional congress
8.1 Tractor licences
The meeting noted that representations had been addressed for a separate system for tractor driver’s licences.
The congress resolved that the request be referred to Agri SA.
8.2 Feed donations
The meeting discussed the handling of feed donations to North West and the Northern Cape.
8.3 Dispute over land tax
Congress noted the request that the procedure according to which individuals should deal with a dispute over land tax be made available.
8.4 Agri Wes-Cape marketing CD
Congress noted the request that Agri Wes-Cape should compile a CD summarising the activities of the organisation.
9. WORCESTER regional congress
9.1 Negative impact of higher minimum wage
9.1.1 Request
The congress requested Agri Wes-Cape to commission an inquiry into the negative impact of the increased minimum wage on the acquisition of houses for farm workers.
9.1.2 Answer
The request was referred to the Agri Wes-Cape Labour/ Social Policy Committee for further attention.
9.2 Transportation of seasonal workers
9.2.1 Request
The congress discussed the problems experienced with own transportation of seasonal workers.
44
9.2.2 Answer
The request was referred to the Agri Wes-Cape Commercial Policy Committee from where it would be raised with the Department of Transport and SAPS.
10. PAARL regional congress
Nothing to report.
------oooOOOooo------
45
Overview of activities
1. MATTERS OF NATIONAL INTEREST
1.1 Agri SA congress resolutions
The Agri SA congress took place on 10 and 11 October 2013 in Pretoria. Besides the guest speakers who provided elucidation on political (Steven Friedman) and economic realities (Kuben Naidoo), three discussion panels dealt with social challenges, access to natural resources and a competitive and profitable agricultural sector, respectively. For this purpose, experts were co-opted from various sides with a view to exposing congress attendees to a variety of and often diverse views. A comprehensive report was compiled in this regard and would also serve to direct future activities of authority structures and policy committees of Agri SA. After the congress, the President of Agri SA formulated the following positions by way of a summary:
• The policy environment must be of such an empowering nature as to promote investment, economic growth and job creation.
• Economies of scale and mechanisation are non-negotiable in agriculture and are in line with job creation in that growth in the sector will also promote the latter.
• Higher levels of prosperity must be created and policy measures must promote this.
• Trade unions must take into consideration the interests of employees and employers because without acknowledgement of their interdependence neither of these groups’ interests can be served.
• Efficiency must be promoted at all levels.
• Trade is key to economic growth, while available and internationally recognised support in respect of market development should be fully utilised in this regard. Distortive international support must be obviated by way of appropriate tariff measures.
• Implementation of agreed-upon policy should be effectively implemented.
• Branding of local agriculture as stable provider of quality commodities must form part of any marketing strategy.
• Inequalities in society must be mitigated, with the retention of those aspects that are conducive to growth.
• Economic growth must be acknowledged as the only vehicle for creating wealth.
46
Election of office bearers
During the 2013 Agri SA congress the organisation elected its leaders who would be at the helm for the upcoming year. Mr Johannes Möller, a farmer from the Upington district was re-elected, unopposed, as President. An amended Agri SA constitution makes provision for the election of a second deputy president. The purpose of this is to elect an office bearer for Agri SA from among the previously disadvantaged groups. Agri SA’s elected deputy presidents are Dr Theo de Jager, a farmer from the Tzaneen district, and Phenias Gumede, a farmer in the Jozini area. The chairmen and vice chairmen of Agri SA’s respective chambers were also elected during the congress. Dan Kriek of Tweeling and Cornie Swart of Gansbaai were elected General Affairs Chamber chair and vice chair, respectively. Louw Steytler, a farmer from Luckhoff, and Elaine Alexander from the Table Grapes industry, were elected as Commodity Chamber chair and vice chair respectively.
1.2 Agri SA policy committees
Since the end of 2008 / beginning of 2009, Agri SA has followed a new modus operandi to prevent overlapping, on the one hand, and to create consensus among different affiliates within organisation, on the other, in order to make better use of available expertise within the Agri SA Group.
The following committees were constituted:
• Commercial Policy Committee • Labour / Social Policy Committee • Transformation Policy Committee • Natural Resources Policy Committee • Rural Safety Policy Committee • Africa Development Committee • Communication and Image-building Policy Committee
All these policy areas are reported on in the annual report.
1.2.1 Commercial policy matters
1.2.1.1 Diesel refund system – Amendment to Schedule 6
In light of problems experienced with the diesel refund system, especially due to a lack of accurate record keeping by producers, SARS published a proposed amendment to Schedule 6 of the Customs and Excise Act in October 2013. In terms of the proposed amendment, producers’ qualifying diesel purchases would be reduced by 30% to make provision for potential non-qualifying purposes that cannot be substantiated by logbooks.
Agri SA and various other organisations submitted commentary on the proposed amendment, indicating that the 30% reduction was 47
excessive. These comments led to the final amendment published to be adjusted to make provision for a 20% reduction.
This amendment meant that where producers failed to keep sufficient records of diesel consumption in the form of logbooks for the period between 1 November 2009 and 31 March 2013, qualifying diesel purchases would be reduced by 20% to make provision for potential non-qualifying purposes. As from 1 April 2013, only logbooks would be accepted as valid evidence in terms of the diesel refund system. The content and format of the logbook were to be clarified at a work session with SARS.
The effect of the amendment is illustrated by way of the following example:
Total litres purchased 105 000.00 Non-qualifying litres 5 000,00 Qualifying litres 100 000,00
80% of qualifying litres 80 000,00 Less 20% in terms of the amendment 64 000,00
Refund (R 1,75 per litre) R 112 000,00
An income tax reconciliation could of course also be performed in respect of the refund (rebate) not granted.
1.2.1.2 Employment Tax Incentive (ETI)
The Employment Tax Incentive Act came into effect on 1 January 2014, introducing the long-awaited Youth Wage Subsidy. This is an incentive aimed at motivating employers to employ young and less experienced job seekers.
The advantage of the ETI is that employers can reduce the cost of employing young people via a cost-sharing mechanism with the government. For example, employers registered for PAYE and who employed a person earning R2 000 for the full month of February 2014, would receive a R1 000 rebate on their monthly PAYE liability (on condition that the employee is a qualifying worker) based on all the remaining requirements.
Employers would be entitled to claim the incentive for a period of 24 months for all employees who qualify for it. The incentive amount will differ depending on the salary of each qualifying employee during the first 12 months and whether the qualifying employee was employed during the first or second 12 months of the ETI programme. This incentive will be supplementary to existing government programmes with similar objectives, for example learnership agreements. The purpose of the ETI is to facilitate an increase in the employment of young job seekers. 48
The employer shall not qualify for the ETI claim if the employer -
* is not registered for employee tax (PAYE);
* is a government institution at national, provincial or local level;
* is a public enterprise listed in Schedule 2 or 3 of the Public Finance Management Act (other than those named by the Minister of Finance by way of a Notice in the Government Gazette);
* a local authority;
* has been disqualified by the Minister of Finance due to the replacement of a worker or has failed to comply with the conditions set by the Minister in the regulations.
An individual is a qualifying employee is he or she -
* is in possession of a valid South Africa ID;
* is between the ages of 18 and 29 (note that the age is not applicable if the employee renders services in a special economic zone (Sez) to an employer who is active in the Sez or if the employee is in the employ of an employer who operates in an industry designated by the Minister of Finance);
* is not a domestic worker;
* is not related to the employer (family member);
* was in the service of the employer or a person related to the employer on or after 1 October 2013; and
* earns a minimum wage that is applicable to that employer or where he/she earns a wage below R2 000 per month as a minimum wage.
There is no limit on the number of qualifying workers that an employer may employ.
The incentive is currently scheduled for up to 31 December 2016, but its effectiveness will be reviewed to determine whether it should be continued. An employer will be able to claim the incentive for a period of 24 months for all employees who qualify.
For any assistance in this regard, you can contact SARS at 0800 00 SARS (7277) or visit your nearest SARS office. 49
1.2.1.3 Diesel refund
The diesel refund that farmers receive was increased on 2 April from R1,75 c/l to R1 878 c/l on 80% of qualifying diesel consumption. This increase arises from Minister Pravin Gordhan’s announcement in February that the Road Accident Fund levy would increase by 8 c/l and the general fuel levy by 12 c/l. At a recent meeting of Agri SA’s Commercial Policy Committee, the importance of keeping logbooks was again discussed. According to the Notice published by SARS in December 2013, the diesel purchases of claimants who had not kept logbooks for the period 1 November 2009 to 1 April 2013 would be reduced by 20% to make provision for potential non-qualifying diesel consumption. As from 1 April 2013, logbooks were to serve as sole proof of purchase. The logbooks as previously published by SARS should serve as a guideline and is merely a summary. It is important to note that all supporting documentation must be kept to substantiate diesel refund claims. Notice 197, which was published in the Government Gazette on 28 March 2014, is available on Agri SA’s website: http://www.agrisa.co.za/committees/commercial/?lang=za
1.2.2 Labour/ Social Policy Committee
1.2.2.1 Agri SA’s Labour/ Social Policy Committee
During the meeting of 13 November 2013, the committee decided to appoint a new executive to deal with labour and social policy matters. The team consisted of the chairman, Hendrik Ackermann of the Northern Cape, with Henk Vermeulen of the Free State as vice chair. The two additional members were Neil Hamman (Jr) of the Western Cape and Pieter Vorster of Limpopo. The main task of the policy committee was to deal with the resolutions adopted at the 2013 Agri SA annual congress which were applicable to the policy committee.
In light of the illegal strikes in the Western Cape, the committee’s focus shifted from labour legislation to aspects relating to social dialogue.
The discussion focused on matters relating to collective bargaining at various levels, as well as the role and vision of the different role players. The definition of collective bargaining is regarded as very important because it does not refer to bargaining councils as such, but rather to the social dialogue platforms that could even extend to farm level.
50
Feedback was also provided on interaction with Deputy President Kgalema Motlanthe under the oversight of the Vulnerable Workers Forum and regarding Cosatu’s section 77 application with reference to the slow pace of transformation in the agricultural sector.
Other matters that served before the committee included training and social issues such as a provident fund for farm workers, the Compensation Commissioner, etc.
1.2.2.2 Provisions pf the National Credit Act: Debt obligations of farm workers
It was clear that certain financial institutions recklessly granted credit to farm workers and that this was a major contributing factor during the labour unrest in the Western Cape. In this regard, the National Credit Act (Act No. 34 of 2005) contains various provisions that limit such actions.
In the first place, the legislation prohibits any person from marketing credit within the workplace unless an appointment had been made with the employee in consultation with the employer. Any farmer would be within his/her rights to refuse access to any person who acts as marketing agent for credit.
Secondly, the legislation states in section 121 that any consumer may cancel any payment agreement within five days if the agreement had not been signed on the supplier/ service provider’s premises. In other words, where clothing or furniture is purchased on credit and monthly payments must be made, the farm worker may cancel the contract within five days, especially if the worker had not visited the store and the contract had not been signed on the premises of the seller. If a travelling sales representative sells the goods on this basis, the contract may be cancelled without giving any reasons for the cancellation. The latter is known as a cooling-off period and gives the workers an opportunity to reconsider whether they wish to take on the debt.
The legislation aims to prevent an excessive debt burden by compelling the credit provider to conduct a thorough creditworthiness assessment before granting any credit. In the case of excessive debt or where credit control was not exercised or where it was clear that the worker does not have the ability to repay the credit but is nevertheless offered credit, the legislation deems such credit as reckless.
In cases where farmers suspect that a worker may have been exposed to reckless credit, they may report the credit provider to the National Credit Regulator (NCR). The NCR’s responsibility is to investigate any credit provider who does not meet the statutory prescripts. In addition, section 13(a) of the act states specifically that the NCR is required to ensure that the credit industry provides a 51
service especially to previously disadvantaged and low-income communities in remote areas. Where the NCR investigates the action of micro-lenders, especially the social problems that it causes, and institutes corrective action, such cases are also reported to the Minister. To enable the NRC to deal properly with these cases, all available information must be provided.
In cases where credit is recklessly granted to workers or where it is clear that the worker is unable to repay the debt incurred, the worker must firstly report to a debt counsellor. Debt counsellors do not act as legal counsel but are independent professionals who can advise their client how to manage debt, and can also advise workers how to organise their finances and even make recommendations to the court as to how the debt can be scheduled and whether someone had been granted credit that can be deemed reckless. Debt counsellors can therefore charge a fee for services rendered. A list of debt counsellors appears on the NCR webpage: www.ncr.org.za.
1.2.2.3 Adjustments to the minimum wage for farm workers
The minimum wage applicable to farm workers increased by 6,4% on 1 March 2014, and not as initially announced by 7%. The first announcement by the Department of Labour was incorrect as the wrong quartile of the November 2013 Consumer price Index (CPI) had been used to calculate the increase in the farm workers’ minimum wage. After Agri SA followed up the incorrect figure (which was pointed out to Agri SA by the forestry industry), the correction was made.
The monthly minimum wage for farm workers increased from R2 274,82 to R2 420,41, while the weekly wage increased from R525,00 to R558,60. The daily wage increased from R105,00 to R111,72 for a nine-hour week day, while the hourly wage increased from R11,66 to R12,41.
In cases where employers cannot afford the increased wage, application may be made for a variation. It is important that employers consult in advance with their workers before any application is made to the Department. Application forms are available on Agri SA’s webpage: http://www.agrisa.co.za/committees/labour-social-welfare
1.2.3 Transformation Policy Committee
1.2.3.1 Restitution Amendment Bill
The Restitution Amendment Bill, which is the legislation that will reopen the land claims process, was passed by the National Assembly on 17 February. The bill must still be approved by the National Council of Provinces. The Council of Provinces intended to finalise it by 26 March, after which the President had to sign it and 52
an implementation date determined. In terms of the bill, claimants will again be able to lodge claims from the date of implementation until 30 June 2019. The criteria for a valid claim remain unchanged. This means, amongst others, that persons who had lost their property rights before 1913 are still unable to lodge a claim.
Agri SA opposed the reopening, largely because the enormous problems experienced with the current process have long not been resolved and because the long-term uncertainty that will be created around land could have a negative impact on the sector. Agri SA sought a legal opinion from a senior advocate who indicated that reopening of the claims process was not unconstitutional. This means there are no legal grounds preventing the reopening of claims. Agri SA nevertheless tabled economic, production and practical arguments as to why the process should not be reopened. Agri SA adopted the view that attention should instead be given to other targeted measures to assist groups such as the Khoi-San descendants and victims of improvement schemes (betterment schemes). As part of the Business negotiating team, Agri SA participated in the Nedlac process in relation to the legislation and also made a submission in Parliament on its views about reopening of the process. Despite this, the National Assembly voted in favour of reopening.
The Department of Rural Development and Land Reform also released a draft policy in which the reopening and processes to be followed were set out. Agri SA commented extensively on this. Agri SA believed that should a new round of claims in fact be allowed, the existing claims should be prioritised. In addition, research on claims should be contracted out to the private sector. Land owners who contest claims should also qualify for legal aid and strict deadlines should be set within which each phase of a claim had to be finalised.
1.2.3.2 Amendments to ESTA
The Extension of Security of Tenure Amendment Bill (ESTA) is currently serving before Nedlac. Representatives of Labour within Nedlac, supported by the representatives of communities, have also suggested amendments which would create additional procedural requirements for evictions.
This includes the requirements that an opportunity should be allowed for consultation with affected parties; that sufficient and effective notice of the proposed eviction should be given to all parties concerned; that information must be provided by the land owners regarding future use of the land or accommodation where land use changes are envisaged, plus the reason for the eviction; and that evictions may not take place during poor weather or during the night.
53
The Business delegation in Nedlac objected to this because eviction was already a very lengthy and expensive process. Government representatives indicated, however, that they would in fact seriously consider such amendments. Labour, once again with the support of communities, asked for compulsory arbitration of disputes. Business was not in favour of this because they did not believe the necessary capacity existed to ensure effective arbitration. The government’s representatives, however, bought into the idea of making mediation as well as arbitration compulsory, while Business argued that full access to the courts should still be possible. A Nedlac report will now be compiled and submitted to Parliament.
1.2.3.3 Consultative workshop: Policy on relative rights
A follow-up workshop was held on Monday, 31 March 2014 to deal with policy proposals made by Minister Nkwinti for strengthening farm workers’ land rights. The proposals entail, among others, that each farm should transfer 50% of land to farm workers, based on their years of service. The previous workshop had been held on 2 August 2013 in Soweto. Agri SA, together with other agricultural organisations, had earlier opposed these policy proposals on the grounds that they were unworkable and most probably also unconstitutional. They would most probably result in disinvestment in the sector and also put food security at risk.
During that workshop an expanded final draft policy document was presented to stakeholders. In the document it is suggested that owners could keep 50% of their land, while workers gain ownership of the remaining 50%. Land distribution is calculated in proportion to the workers’ contribution towards the development of the farm, based on the number of years they had worked there. An investment and development fund (trust) would be created which must be representative of shareholders in the land. The compensation paid by the government for this redistribution arrangement will not be for the account of the existing land owners but will be deposited in the said trust for the empowerment of farm workers participating in the farming operation. The point of departure for this is that land owners had already received sufficient benefit from so-called “exploitative wages” and privileges in the past.
During the workshop, Agri SA reaffirmed its support for the ideal of tenure security and farm worker empowerment. The organisation, however, made it very clear that the proposed policy was fundamentally flawed and could not realistically be implemented. The deprivation of land without compensation cannot be justified and discriminated against the agricultural sector vis-à-vis other sectors. No farmer can afford to lose the value and use of 50% of his/her land. Agri SA’s view was that if these policy proposals were to be implemented, it could lead to serious disruption of food and fibre production. The proposals are also unclear as to whether land distribution would be compulsory and whether farmers would have a 54
choice in this regard. Agri SA made it very clear that it would oppose the compulsory implementation of such a policy, if necessary all the way to the Constitutional Court.
In his speech at this occasion, Minister Nkwinti indicated that progress was being made with the formulation of the policy and that his department would continue consulting with stakeholders in this regard, including bilateral consultations. He said, among other things, that it was now a class matter rather than a race matter as both white and black commercial farmers had indicated their objection to the policy proposals in their current form. The department undertook to compile a report on the workshop and circulate it to the stakeholders in due course.
Agri SA welcomed the opportunity to liaise with other stakeholders and indicated its willingness to participate in the formulation of alternative policy.
1.2.3.4 National Consultative Workshop: The 1913 restitution cut-off date
On 14 and 15 May 2014 Agri SA’s representatives attended a national workshop convened by Minister Nkwinti. The purpose was to discuss limited exceptions to the 1913 cut-off date, especially with reference to descendants of persons who had been deprived of their land before 19 June 1913. The Minister indicated that a three-fold point of departure would apply, namely:
• The descendants of the Khoi and San people who were mostly deprived of their land before 1913; • For the recognition of certain heritage sites; and • The return of some of these sites to the communities who wish to restore them for cultural purposes.
For purposes of the workshop, only the first two aspects were open for discussion. A workshop to deal with the position around the extension of the 1939 deadline for the Khoi and San descendants has already taken place.
It was clear from the outset that the intention was to make exceptions on a case-to-case basis. Exceptions were made to give recognition to heritage sites and historic landmarks in order to address the exclusion in the past because some of these people were not able to lodge claims before the previous deadline. The workshops also determined broad principles that the work stream would use to establish a policy framework.
The National Heritage Resources Act currently stipulates that the Department of Art and Culture must facilitate access to heritage sites, especially where these sites are situated on private land. During the workshop it became apparent that there was a movement away from the principle that access should be facilitated in favour of the 55
principle that heritage sites should instead be returned to the people to whom they had belonged earlier in history. Preliminary definitions for heritage sites and historic landmarks are very wide and vague and include a large variety of cultural interests, for example places, buildings, structures and equipment of wide-ranging culture-historic interest. This includes historic places where certain traditions had practised earlier, with reference to topographic, archaeological and paleontological places and graves of historic figures or battlefields and landmarks which are scarce and where there was the possibility that South Africa’s natural and cultural heritage could be destroyed.
The legal mechanism that will be followed is not clear at this stage, especially as matters dealing with culture-historic issues and which are handled elsewhere will be incorporated into land reform. Agri SA has indicated that it would be involved and stay involved in the process and therefore had nominated two representatives for this purpose.
1.2.3.5 Strategic session on land reform
On 9 June 2014 Agri SA held a strategic workshop on land reform. In light of the many developments in this regard and concern regarding certain policy, the implications of draft legislation and the ruling of the Constitutional Court in the lawsuit relating to ‘old order’ mineral rights, Agri SA’s executive deemed it advisable to arrange a one-day workshop to discuss certain burning issues around land reform. The session was well attended. Various external experts addressed the workshop and elucidation was provided on the following issues, followed by discussions:
• Reopening of the restitution process: A senior advocate shared some practical advice with those present regarding the management of the restitution process, especially in light of the expected reopening of the claims process. This advice will be included in Agri SA’s updated guideline on restitution and distributed to members.
• With regard to Minister Nkwinti proposal for a 50% shareholding in farms, Agri SA had already suggested workable alternatives which are still being debated within the working group. Agri SA was participating in the relevant Green Paper working group where an attempt is made to find middle ground around this proposal. An attorney from Cape Town gave his perspectives on the Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform’s proposal relating to a 50% shareholding in farms for farm workers and made proposals regarding a possible alternative approach to the controversial proposal. Agri SA will deliberate further on ways in which farm worker housing and working conditions can be improved to a uniform and acceptable standard and look at viable options for off-farm accommodation. 56
• An agricultural economist provided inputs on land ceilings, the right of first refusal and black economic empowerment with regard to land reform. The workshop again concluded that land ceilings were unworkable. Agri SA will look into the viability of a right of first refusal and the conditions to which it should be subject. Agri SA had already in 2013 formulated a number of plans which were furnished to the agricultural economist to refine and comment on the viability thereof. The report that was prepared by this agricultural economist was made available to National Planning Commission to assist in putting together a pilot project in Mpumalanga.
• An input was also provided regarding the needs of farmers in communal areas. Agri SA is in the process of formulating a policy on communal land and has tried to gain greater insight into the realities with which farmers in communal areas are confronted. There seems to be a great need for support in terms of agricultural production and markets in these areas.
• The Constitutional Court ruling in the case Agri SA vs. the Minister of Minerals was discussed in depth and the possible implications thereof for other types of property were highlighted. An advocate, who had been involved in preparing a written opinion requested by Agri SA regarding the Protection and Promotion of Investments Bill, presented a summary of the opinion to the workshop. According to the opinion, the provisions of the bill which are aimed at limiting the definition of expropriation could be considered unconstitutional on more than one basis.
• A former judge also provided input on the framework of the constitutional protection of property rights, while an agricultural economist explained what the National Planning Commission’s proposals for land reform entail.
• Agri SA’s president provided a 12-point summary of the day’s discussions and, among others, referred to the need for a pragmatic approach to the protection of a farmer’s investment. More work will have to be done in light of certain matters that were identified, while a possible follow-up strategic session was also envisaged.
1.2.3.6 Policy relating to the ownership of agricultural land: Latest developments around proposed limit on land ownership
The Green Paper on Land Policy which was published during September 2011 proposed a fourfold dispensation of land ownership, namely state land, communal land, private land of limited size and land ownership by foreigners, which will be regulated. One of the ways in which the Green Paper aims to limit 57 the extent of private land ownership is by setting so-called land ceilings to restrict the number of hectares that a person may own. Agri SA participated in the workshop which discussed the curtailment of private ownership and constantly maintained a strong, well- motivated position against the introduction of such limitations. The draft policy, however, was later adjusted to place greater emphasis on the facilitation of access to more land for small-scale farmers. The idea of limitations on larger land owners, however, to some extent remains in the policy, which is known as the "Agricultural Landholding Policy".
Recently a regulatory impact assessment (RIA) was commissioned with regard to the policy. The service provider was Business Enterprises of the University of Pretoria (under the auspices of Prof. Mark Oranje and Prof. Jeannie van Wyk). On 3 and 4 June, consultation took place in this regard. Agri SA was represented by Annelize Crosby and Theo Boshoff, while Phile van Zyl was also in attendance.
Prof. van Wyk, in her presentation on the RIA, said three pieces of research had been conducted: a law study by Prof. Nic Olivier who, among other things, had to look at the constitutionality of the policy; a social study by Prof. Sam Kariuke, and an agricultural economic study by Andrew Makanete. Two policy workshops were also held where it became clear that land ceilings were not acceptable. The policy was then redrafted to focus more on fair redistribution and the facilitation of access for new farmers. Mr Hilton Toolo, head of policy at the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform, said although the policy had already been signed by Minister Nkwinti, it was still work in progress and the department was still consulting in this regard. He said compulsory disclosure of ownership and tenure was envisaged. District committees will play an important part in rolling out the policy. The Land Commission Bill will probably have to be amended to make provision for compulsory disclosure of information and for the functions of the district committees. Prof. van Wyk explained that the policy makes provision for three categories of land ownership, namely small, medium and large farming operations. The idea was to bring the extent of ownership falling under the minimum-size of the lowest category above that level and to bring the extent of land ownership above the ceiling downwards.
Dr van Wyk explained the methodology followed by Business Enterprises: Desk studies were conducted to look at international experience with land ceilings and also to perform a cost-benefit analysis. General conclusions that were reached from international experience include the following: A land institution will have to be created to implement the policy; compensation will have to be paid to those who lose their land; a specific date must be set on which those owning land above the ceiling will lose their land; minimum sizes must be set and there must be a way in which beneficiaries are 58
selected, after which loans should be made available to such beneficiaries. It was also found that in developed countries there was a direct relationship between land size and productivity, while in developing countries the opposite is true.
Two alternatives were considered: The first is to maintain the status quo - this is not a realistic option. The second, which Business Enterprises prefers to the existing policy, entails better use of existing legislation such as the Spatial Development and Land Use Act and, where necessary, the creation of new legislation. They also suggest that all role players should become involved in the process, which will be implemented largely at municipal level. A pilot project is also proposed as a phased approach. The participants provided much comment and expressed a preference for option 2 should the government decide to go ahead with the policy. The point was made once again that land ceilings could probably cause huge economic disruption and will possibly also have a negative impact on food security.
Further consultations on this matter are envisaged.
1.2.4 Natural Resources Policy Committee
1.2.4.1 Proposed new National Water Act
Agri SA supports the vision of the Department of Water Affairs to consolidate the historic policy documents into one document with a view to combining the National Water Act (NWA) and the Water Services Act which regulate the entire water dispensation. Seamless legislation will direct the holistic implementation of water legislation, especially where the latter currently appears to be the main obstacle.
Agri SA’s position entails the following:
“Agri SA cited examples to illustrate that the current problems listed in the policy review are not related to poor policy formulation, but in fact relate to poor implementation. We believe that concerted efforts to improve the implementation of existing laws and policies will negate the need for a drastic shift in policy.
The organisation believes that the combination of the moratorium on water trading between authorised users and the 'use-it-or-lose-it' principle will amount to expropriation without compensation, which can have significant constitutional implications. In addition, it may have the unintended consequence of water being used unproductively, rather that released for further development and distribution to previously disadvantaged persons.
We are of the opinion that the prioritizing of social and economic equity in the reallocation of water should not be seen in isolation
59
from land reform initiatives and the need to maintain production in the interest of food security.
We objected to the disbandment of Irrigation Boards/Water User Associations (WUAs) and proposed that devolution of power to WUA's is the sensible course to follow with water resource management at catchment level, proven to be best practice internationally.
Whilst we support the introduction of mediation and conciliation in dispute resolution we cannot support the proposals to align it with the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) as far as it may limit an applicant's access to court.
Agri SA would like to see key omissions such as climate change, the biological health of our water resources and the Minister's support to local municipalities dealt with in the policy.
Finally, Agri SA will also make use of the opportunity to address the Portfolio Committee on Water and Environmental Affairs on the subject. The finalisation of the National Water Policy and the amendments to legislation will determine the implications for irrigators' water use rights.”
1.2.4.2 Review of the pricing strategy for water
The Department of Water Affairs (DWA) consulted with stakeholders on the review of the pricing strategy for water. Expectations are that the draft pricing strategy will be published for commentary in the Government Gazette by the end of the year. The objective of introducing a funding model and establishing an economic regulator is work in progress.
The department inquired into the introduction of a national irrigation tariff, but after thorough evaluation thereof, abandoned the idea. The principle of a catchment area scheme tariff still appears to be the best option.
The department, however, is in favour of full recovery of costs (maintenance and operating), including the capital and interest on existing and new schemes. In its provisional comment, Agri SA asked that a further investigation be conducted into the total fiscal impact of the respective irrigation schemes to get a better picture of the direct and indirect economies of scale for the government in terms of taxes, export earnings, etc. Full recovery of costs could result in double taxation - something government should be aware of because it could have socio-economic implications. The expectation is that targeted subsides will have to be negotiated in future via the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF) and the National Treasury. In a letter from DAFF, the department informed
60
the DWA of the problems regarding such an approach. Further discussions in this regard will take place within the CEO Forum.
The Waste Discharge Charge System (WDCS) is being investigated at present. Two tariffs are envisaged, namely a Waste Discharge Levy and a Waste Mitigation Charge. The application of this to irrigation is somewhat uncertain given agriculture’s non-point-source-pollution character. The introduction of a Future Infrastructure Build Charge (FIBC) will, however, be applicable to irrigation agriculture and will be phased in over a period of 10 years. This charge replaces the return-on-investment charge (ROA) from which agriculture was previously exempted.
1.2.4.3 Regulations for petroleum exploration and extraction
Agri SA submitted commentary to the Department of Mineral and Energy Affairs (DME) on the proposed regulations for petroleum (shale-gas) exploration and extraction. To compile such commentary, consultations took place with independent researchers.
Agri SA asked the DME to ensure that shale-gas development is subject to the following:
• “Research into the potential effect of Hydraulic Fracturing (fracking) on the underground water resources to be conducted simultaneously with the proposed exploration drilling phase;
• Codes of best practice to be developed and implemented, which should include full public disclosure of all chemicals/fluids to be used in the process, together with their hazard status;
• The development of a new legislative and regulatory framework dispensation, also with a view to involving interested and affected parties in shale-gas exploration policy development, e.g. the establishment of a monitoring committee, drafting of appropriate regulations and strengthening of the National Water Act to provide for enhanced protection of groundwater resources;
• The establishment of an independent regulator consisting of objective analysts and academics with sufficient knowledge and ability to monitor and control the fracking process adequately. The appointment of such persons should be transparent and agreed to by representatives of landowners, particularly those from the agricultural industry. This regulator should receive sufficient funding from government and shale-gas developers, and should have wide powers to enable it to perform its functions adequately and in a manner that will engender trust among all the affected parties;
• The establishment of a social and environmental trust fund or guarantee to deal with the immediate needs of farmers and communities negatively affected by shale-gas development; 61
• Proper waste management to be carried out in respect of all fracking fluids and the emanating water, dissolved solids and solid waste in respect of which regulations (to the extent that they do not already exist) should be promulgated, but at the very least to provide that it be stored in sealed containers (and not in open ponds) to be disposed of at designated waste disposal sites (to be constructed prior to drilling/fracking operations, if necessary) in an ecologically acceptable manner;
• Imposing a duty on the shale-gas developers to fund repairs to the road and transport infrastructure as may be required and, in the event of such damage occurring, to assume liability for and immediately attend to the repair of any such damage or deterioration in infrastructure. To this end, it is expected that the quality of the infrastructure be monitored on an ongoing basis;
• The bio-diversity of all fracking areas affected by drilling/fracking operations is preserved and all reasonable measures are taken in this regard. Full disclosure of fracking densities in any given locality as well as detailed environmental impact assessment in respect of all listed activities should be enforced by government;
• Adequate security be provided to landowners to provide for compensation for any damages (directly/indirectly/consequential) sustained as a consequence of the proposed drilling/fracking activities; and
• A solatium is payable to each landowner for the inconvenience caused and disruption of farming operations by drilling operators on his/her property.
1.2.4.4 Connection of power generation to Eskom’s low-tension network
A South African client’s perspective in terms of electricity consumption is being developed. The reasons for this include the following: rising electricity prices; the risk of load-shedding at a time when South Africa faces capacity limitations; the need to be energy efficient, as well as the ever-growing need to be a good citizen by using green energy. These factors contributed to the fact that some clients (big and small) were to an increasing extent considering alternative sources of energy, including the option to generate their own electricity. There has been an increasing interest among residential clients to install solar panels on their roofs. This communiqué sheds light on the current challenges which must first be addressed before such connections can be made in a sustainable and controllable manner.
These generators may currently be connected to the power network, i.e. the client’s generator works parallel to the Eskom network and supplements the energy which would otherwise have been imported 62 from Eskom. If the installation is connected to the power network, permission must be obtained from Eskom because there are legal, safety and electricity-quality implications, whether or not electricity is exported to the power network.
Eskom is currently in the process of developing the legal, technical, measurement and tariff framework for connecting small-scale electricity generation to the low-tension network. There is an existing, approved process which allows generators to be connected to Eskom’s medium and high-tension networks (1000V). One of the requirements is that clients must convert to Eskom’s large-user electricity tariffs which reflect Eskom’s average energy costs.
The Eskom process for medium- and higher-tension connections is available at: http://www.eskom.co.za/Whatweredoing/InfoSiteForIPPs/Pages/Gui de_To_Independent_Power_Producer_IPP_Processes. Aspx
The Eskom framework for connecting small-scale generators is in the process of being developed and, for safety, tariff and technical reasons, small-scale generation will not be connected to the power network until the framework is in place.
This framework will take the following into consideration:
• Resources to manage additional client requests (human and financial resources).
• Decisions regarding the type of meter to be installed – meters must be able to measure the import and export of energy.
• Clients must understand the implications, namely that such installations pose a safety and fire risk to the client; that the necessary national standards and accreditation to ensure that such installations are safe must be in place; and that the installations must be done by appropriately accredited and authorised contractors.
• Impact on Eskom’s existing administration and accounting systems.
• Impact on Eskom’s income from these clients, current tariff structures and tariffs, as well as the possibility of credit tariffs which must first be approved by NERSA.
• Rules relating to month-to-month ‘banking’ (transfer of energy from one month to the next).
• Contracting – the client’s understanding of and Eskom’s obligations to comply with the Consumer Protection Act and other technical legislation.
63
• The safety of Eskom's workers and other clients.
Until the framework is in place, clients who have a low-tension supply are not allowed to connect any electricity generated to the Eskom network because it could put the safety of the public and Eskom employees at risk. Eskom will also not allow meters to be turned back and has the right to disconnect any supply that is connected to its network without permission.
ENQUIRIES
An Eskom working group is currently working on a framework that must be approved within Eskom and, where necessary, by NERSA. Eskom is also working closely with SALGA in order to ensure uninterrupted application and connection processes.
Any enquiries relating to this type of connection must be addressed to the Client Service group GRID ACCESS UNIT, which sponsors the project.
The contact person and project leader for the low-tension generation framework is Ravi Moonsamy: [email protected]
1.2.5 Rural Safety Policy Committee
1.2.5.1 Rural safety
Rural criminality is one of the most unacceptable aspects confronting farmers on a daily basis. Not only must they live with it, but the high level thereof also gives rise to unacceptable costs and losses for farmers. The losses are due to theft of products, livestock, implements and inputs, as well as damage caused during perpetration of crimes.
One of the outcomes of this violence culture is the unacceptable loss of human life, which does not occur only in farm context but also within the total community. Maintaining law and order and promoting a safe working and living environment for the farming community remains one of Agri SA’s highest priorities. This matter is dealt with on an ongoing basis by the organisation’s Rural Protection Priority Committee. During a recent meeting of the committee, various facets of rural safety were discussed, including the following:
• The unlawful arrest of farmers by police officers, who fail to follow instructions to prevent such incidents, has again been reported. A survey of such incidents is being conducted to determine the extent and occurrence thereof so that further action can be discussed with the police.
• During the previous report year, the Rural Protection Strategy was implemented at approximately 40 police stations. The strategy will 64 be implemented at the remaining stations during the current financial year. One of the shortcomings in implementing the strategy is the accessibility that the rural community has to policing and the lack of resources such as vehicles, specifically for rural safety purposes. This aspect has already been discussed with the Minister of Police, who was urged to ensure that the necessary resources are made available.
• The Reservist policy framework has been approved by the Minister of Police and has already been made available to provincial organisations. The committee encouraged farmers to become involved in the system.
• The committee once again called on farmers to apply the protocol for farm access consistently and to erect the necessary protocol notices.
• The committee also accepted the previous protocol which Agri SA had signed with the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC). It sets out the rules for access to farms for the IEC as well as for holding political meetings away from the farm at public venues. Agri SA had already informed the IEC in writing of its willingness to co-operate with the commission on this basis.
• An agreement exists between Agri SA and CrisisOnCall regarding the provision of various services that can be rendered to farmers in a crisis or emergency situation. More particulars about these services are available at www.crisisoncall.co.za by calling 0861574747.
• At the request of farmers, Agri SA - in collaboration with T&E Finops - developed the family protection insurance plan (previously Agri Securitas Trauma insurance). The objective with this plan is to provide assistance, especially to victims of farm attacks in terms of hospital costs, but the product also offers benefits in the event of incidental death, incidental disability and hospitalisation, as well as trauma benefits.
The family protection insurance plan was developed specifically to make provision of such situations. To find out more about the product, call 0861 440 666.
During the committee’s meeting and with the approval of the General Council, the following persons were elected as Executive Committee members:
• Chair: Kobus Breytenbach (Free State Agriculture) • Vice Chair: Boeta du Toit (Agri North West) • Executive Committee member: Nico Smuts (Agri Eastern Cape)
65
1.2.5.2 Assistance with crime-fighting initiatives
The incidence of farm crime such as murder, armed robbery, stock theft, etc. is one of the threats that have a negative impact on individuals’ safety and on the production capacity of agriculture. The money that Agri Securitas Trust Fund recently made available to farming communities countrywide will contribute towards effective implementation of their own precautionary measures. Judging from the requests for contributions, it seems that the need for assistance is increasing on a wide front. The feedback received, however, indicated that the assistance made a difference to communities’ safety and people’s lives.
In an attempt to safeguard rural communities more effectively, the Trust Fund supports projects that can contribute to realisation of this ideal. This includes projects aimed at prevention as well as after- care. The following farming communities recently benefited from the assistance provided by the Trust Fund:
• Agri Marico Bosveld in the North West province was assisted with the purchase of night vision equipment.
• In Mpumalanga the Platrand Farmers’ Association received assistance with the purchase of communication equipment.
• Communication and night vision equipment was allocated to the Tweeling Farmers’ Association in the Free State.
• Sonop Farmers’ Association in the Northern Cape was recently targeted by criminals. They were provided with Communication equipment.
• Various trauma counselling workshops were recently held in the North West and the Northern Cape provinces. The workshops are of value because these farming communities, which are not always located near support services to address their emotional problems, are now able to access such services in their own area.
The Trust Fund, with a positive attitude, attempts to create a safer and more prosperous farming community. In executing its mandate, Agri SA’s provincial organisations play an important role in evaluating requests from grassroots level for submission to the Board of Trustees. Ongoing contributions from strategic partners such as Sanlam, Vodacom, Nissan SA and CrisisOnCall enable the Trust Fund to continue making a contribution to the safety of farming communities.
66
1.2.6 Communication and Image-building Policy Committee
1.2.6.1 Agri receives recognition at PICA awards
Agri, the organisation’s two-monthly magazine (which incorporates Die Boer/The Farmer), received a “highly commended” citation in the business-to-business category (resource-based industries) at the PICA awards in November 2013. Agri SA is very proud of this award because it was the first time that the organisation participated in the competition.
From a total of 488 magazines entered for the awards in various categories, Agri was one of only a handful that received an award during the gala function.
The PICA awards are presented annually for publication and editorial excellence. This serves as recognition of excellence in the magazine industry and journalistic work of high quality. The business-to- business category affords recognition to publications that focus, among others, on agriculture, mining, the environment and waste management.
Agri provides background information on policy, legislation and programmes that are of interest to farmers. It also offers advice, extension and news regarding topical issues to more than 27 000 farmers who are members of the organisation via the respective affiliates. The magazine’s circulation figures are also audited by the Audit Bureau of Circulation (ABC). During the previous audit, the magazine received a clean audit.
1.2.6.2 Important information on Agri SA’s webpage
The following documents which appear on Agri SA’s webpage contain important information of which affiliates and their members must take note. Please visit the webpage to read the full documents.
• National Divisional Directive regarding reporting of stock theft incidents The uncertainty around the correct procedure that should be followed to report stock theft incidents to the police was discussed by Agri SA’s Rural Safety Committee. The police were asked to formulate procedural arrangements which would assist with the effective reporting of such incidents. The National Directive 01/2013 spells out the correct procedure for reporting such incidents at station level.
• South African Police Service Regulations on disciplinary action
67
The Rural Safety Committee has on various occasions discussed complaints relating to unprofessional conduct on the part of police officers. The police were requested to make information available on procedures that should be followed to report such incidents. The enclosed regulations provide the necessary background in this regard.
• Agricultural insurance Agricultural insurance is, for various reasons, crucial to support the sector’s sustainable success. One of the most important reasons is that it will protect farmers against risks relating to natural disasters such as drought and floods. Agricultural insurance in South Africa dates back to the 1970s when the government introduced a subsidised insurance scheme to offer farmers the opportunity to take out insurance against drought, Read more about the progress that has been made in South Africa in this regard since then.
• Useful information relating to the declaration and classification of disasters and funding thereof This article is meant to describe institutional responsibilities and procedures around the declaration and classification of disasters and accompanying procedures for funding. Farmer associations, in particular, should find it useful when disasters occur, whether man- made or natural, for example floods, drought and veld fires that cause death, injury or damage to property and the environment.
2. MATTERS OF PROVINCIAL INTEREST
2.1. Introduction
During the 2013/2014 report year, office bearers and personnel of Agri Wes-Cape were involved in various activities in the interest of the Western Cape agricultural community. In order to deal with the matters affecting agriculture, the Agri Wes-Cape board of directors uses the same policy areas as Agri SA currently uses, except the Africa policy committee which was created to manage the distribution of work better. Members of the board and the executive of Agri Wes-Cape serve on the Agri Wes-Cape policy committees based on their relevant field of expertise. In addition to these agricultural leaders, expertise was also co-opted to make inputs towards the respective policy areas.
2.2 Agri Wes-Cape policy committees
The following reports of the Agri Wes-Cape policy committees are dealt with in the same order as at national level.
68
2.2.1 Commercial Policy Committee
2.2.1.1 SARS matters:
Despite ongoing communication with SARS, the situation relating to the registration of PAYE umbers of employees remains a problem and is causing many delays in finalising producers’ financial statements.
With regard to the committee’s enquiry concerning the tax implications when purchasing and writing off equipment, the committee was informed that based on the Income tax Act, the following principles applied: • Section (B) stipulates the deductions that apply when purchasing new equipment, based on the 50:30:20 formula, with which there cannot be a problem; • Paragraph 66 of the legislation deals specifically with capital gains tax and the reinvestment of replacement assets. A person can exercise the option where this paragraph would be applicable in the case of disposal of an asset which does not qualify for a deduction.
2.2.1.2 Diesel logbook:
During the report year SARS provided examples of a logbook which was not practical for agriculture. Agri SA proposed a simpler logbook.
On 31 December 2013 SARS published an official announcement in the Government Gazette to the effect that the fine for failing to keep a logbook or proof of diesel use since 2009 was set at 20% of the 80% refund that can be claimed.
Producers were therefore requested always to keep good records of diesel use while negotiations are underway for a more workable logbook.
2.2.1.3 Property rates
Agri SA has compiled a document with guidelines on how negotiations should take place with municipalities for property tax purposes. The document was circulated to affiliates.
A survey was conducted to determine the difference (net) in property rates between the various district municipalities in the Western Cape. The committee recommended that a limit on the percentage contribution that agriculture must make to municipal income be negotiated.
The meeting noted that since each municipality was autonomous, collective bargaining in respect of property rates was not possible within the province.
69
2.2.1.4 Roads-related matters:
During the year discussions took place with SANRAL and the Department of Transport (Western Cape) regarding complaints received from agricultural associations. The feedback was passed on the different agricultural associations and the information was also posted on the Agri Wes-Cape webpage.
The problem relating to certain farm implements, including harvesters, for which no accommodation is made within the licensing system, was also communicated to the Department of Transport which will follow it up.
2.2.1.5 Telecommunication in rural areas
It was recommended that producers in areas where Telkom communication is not satisfactory should switch to satellite communication.
2.2.1.6 Uniform audit system/code of ethics for commodities
In conjunction with the Agri Wes-Cape Commodity Chamber, a more uniform and inexpensive audit system/ code of ethics that would be more acceptable to producers and buyers, was discussed. The Commodity Chamber recommended to the board of directors that since commodities in the province were very different, a single general protocol/ code of ethics applicable to all commodities was supported (legislation, labour and social matters). A commodity- specific code can then be added for each commodity (production, marketing, processing practices).
The system developed by the fruit industry, namely SIZA (Sustainability Initiative of SA), was recommended by the Agri Wes- Cape Commodity Chamber for the commodities’ consideration.
2.2.1.7 Transportation of farm workers
Information regarding the provisions of the Road Traffic Act and accompanying regulations relating to the transportation of workers was forwarded to affiliates, reiterating that vehicles used for this purposes must be roadworthy and not overloaded.
The vehicles must have the necessary side cover – seated passengers ((350mm above the seat) or standing passengers (900mm) – to prevent them from falling off. No person may be transported in the same compartment as equipment or goods unless a partition had been made for this purpose.
70
2.2.2 Social Policy Committee
2.2.2.1 Labour unrest 2012/ FARE report (Future Agricultural Rural Economy Development)
In light of the labour unrest in 2012, the Western Cape premier launched the FARE process. Agri Wes-Cape participated in the process, but was very disappointed with the outcome of the investigation/ report. The position was communicated as such to the Western Cape government and all involvement in the process was stopped.
2.2.2.2 Agri Wes-Cape labour legislation: Newsletters
The 27 labour newsletters referred to in the previous annual report are only available under member information on the die Agri Wes- Cape webpage.
2.2.2.3 Labour inspections
The Department of Labour conducts labour inspections on farms. Producers are advised to comply strictly with statutory requirements and to keep all documentation in order. Compliance orders that may be issued when the incorrect modus operandi is followed and/or where administration does not meet the statutory requirements, can be followed up via the Agri Wes-Cape office.
Producers should insist that the correct protocol as compiled by Agri SA with role players is followed at all times during farm visits/ inspections.
2.2.2.4 Farm Worker of the Year competition
The competition hosted by the Western Cape Department of Agriculture and financed by the provincial farm worker development programme and sponsorships was again a success this year. The winners serve on the Western Cape Minister of Agriculture’s Farm Worker Forum which advises the minister on farm worker-related matters.
2.2.2.5 Farm worker housing
The committee discussed ASLA’s proposal for a housing institution, with an own board registered at SHRA (Social Housing Regulation Authority), to be considered between ASLA Devco and agriculture. Further details, especially in respect of the cost analysis of what the producer’s contribution per worker should be, must first be ascertained.
71
2.2.2.6 Survey of empowerment projects
Affiliates were requested via the Agri Wes-Cape Commodity Chamber to provide the office with information regarding any empowerment projects so that a complete database can be compiled. The response to date has not been very good.
2.2.2.7 Minimum wage
The following new minimum wages for farm workers, which will apply from 1 March 2014 to 28 February 2015, were published by the Department of Labour in the Government Gazette: Monthly R2 420.41 Weekly R558.60 Daily R111.72 (for 9-hour working day) Hourly R12.41
Employers who cannot afford the increase may, after consultation with their workers, apply for deviation from the minimum wage.
After the announcement of the new minimum wage, a flash survey was conducted among affiliates and it was determined that there had in fact been a decline in job opportunities as a result of the new increased minimum wage (10% to 30%, depending on the region and commodity). In light of the increased cost of labour, productivity becomes increasingly important.
Agri Wes-Cape supports Agri SA’s view that collective bargaining (bargaining council) in agriculture was not possible due to the diversity of the sector as well as within commodity branches. However, the matter is being dealt with at national level.
2.2.2.8 Registration of workers
Agri SA reached an agreement with the Department of Home Affairs that the agricultural sector would assist the department with the registration of workers older than 18 years (issuing of ID douments) as well as the registration of births on farms. Agri Wes-Cape’s affiliates and their members were also asked to ensure that workers were able to participate in the general election on 7 May 2014.
2.2.2.9 ILO Report (International Labour Organisation)
Concern was expressed regarding the ILO’s survey of conditions of farms in South Africa. The current process followed, as well as the objectivity thereof, was questioned because certain persons and organisations wanted to hijack the process for personal gain. Agriculture had insisted that the inquiry should be carried out in an independent/ unbiased and scientifically correct manner.
72
2.2.3 Transformation Policy Committee
2.2.3.1 Provincial land audit
Agri Wes-Cape is disappointed to report that despite various efforts made via the Agri Wes-Cape General Affairs Chamber Executive, agricultural associations and commodity structures, the provincial land audit has not yet been completed. This was due to the poor response from farmers (members as well as non-members).
It is in every farmer’s interest to participate in the project and to enable Agri Wes-Cape to convey the true situation regarding transformation within the Western Cape via the local authority to the state. It is clear that other strategies will now have to be followed. In this way, the questionnaire was shortened and simplified to source only highly important information. The adjusted questionnaire is now being tested in certain regions and will then be rolled out to all regions. Agri Wes-Cape wishes once again to give its assurance that no individual information would be made known. Information about empowerment projects will be compiled and released on a local authority basis.
2.2.3.2 Database: Provincial empowerment projects
Another project has been started to compile a complete database of all empowerment projects (private initiative and state projects). Affiliates (agricultural associations and commodity organisation) were requested to provide the office with all information regarding empowerment projects, transformation and land reform. In this case the response has also been very slow.
2.2.3.3 Status of transformation in the Western Cape
After negotiations, the Agri Wes-Cape board of directors and the AFASA executive decided jointly “…to convince government that potential farmers/beneficiaries to be identified before they get access to land and that the necessary training, support systems and mentoring should be provided to ensure a successful project – a potential farmer must have the passion to farm” .
Formal co-operation between the two organisations has already taken place on more than one occasion.
The committee is of the opinion that the agricultural sector should see it as a given that transformation of agricultural land (ownership) should be supported, also through mentorships and training of beneficiaries, whether with government funding or other capital (each commodity can decide what the best workable form will be).
The chairmen of the industries involved in CPAC (Commodity Project Allocation Committee) projects regularly provide feedback on these 73
projects. Given the diversity of the industries in the province, work projects are not equally successful for all. Problems are regularly reported to the Western Cape Department of Agriculture, for example incompetent extension officers involved in projects; delays in disbursing funds; delays due to the conflicting statutory requirements such as environmental impact studies when erecting a pig unit.
Instances occurred where funds were not received in time, for example for the purchase of seed and fertilisers or to establish new trees and vines. This inevitably means that the activity must stand over until the next season, which in turn affects the economic viability of the projects.
A request was also made via Agri SA that the PLAS programme (Proactive Land Acquisition Strategy) where the state remains the owner of the land and beneficiaries are identified subject to certain conditions, should not be used for long-term commodities, for example the fruit industry.
2.2.3.4 Green Paper on Land Reform
The consultation process around the new Green Paper took approximately two years. Agri SA participated intensively in the process and regularly provided feedback to and consulted with its affiliates. The Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform decided that the outcome of consultations would not be included in a White Paper and that separate policy documents should instead be compiled. In total this amounts to 14 policy documents.
As far as could be ascertained, the following is already accepted policy: • Policy on the leasing of state land; • Re-development and recapitalisation policy; • The rural development framework; • The policy on tenure reform in commercial agricultural areas.
Legislation that has already seen the light following the Green Paper process is the following: • The Restitution of Land Rights Amendment Bill (reopening of the restitution claims process); • The Property Valuation Bill, which establishes the office of the Valuer-General; and • The Land Commission Bill was published, which makes provision for the establishment of the Land Commission, the composition and functioning thereof and the powers of the Commission. The latter is limited to the establishment and maintenance of a database of state land, advice to the minister on the management of the land and resolution of disputes.
74
2.2.3.5 Expropriation Bill
Agri SA was part of the Business team which dealt with the bill within Nedlac. The bill originated in the Department of Public Works. It is expected that the bill will soon be tabled in Parliament. It creates no new expropriation powers and dictates the process which must be followed by all ministers and institutions that have expropriation powers in terms of other legislation in the event of expropriation. It does not limit the power of the courts and contains full particulars regarding the administrative justice requirements with which the state must comply in order to protect property owners.
2.2.3.6 Reopening of land claims process
Agri SA was part of the Business team within Nedlac which negotiated on the reopening of the restitution claims process. Agri SA’s objections were ignored and the bill was passed in Parliament. It was announced that land claims would be reopened for persons who had lost their land rights after 2013. The process was opened for five years and claims may be registered until December 2018. Agri SA is involvement in the management of the process and has started to hold discussions with the Khoisan leaders in this regard. Agri Wes-Cape was invited to form part of the delegation.
2.2.3.7 Extension of Security of Tenure Amendment Bill
Agri SA was involved via Nedlac in the negotiations around the amendment bill which deals with, among others, the definition of family and dependants and the establishment of the Land Rights Management Council and committees. The bill also deals with the erection of gravestones and repairs to houses.
2.2.4 Natural resources
2.2.4.1 Environmental impact evaluation (EIA)
The Agri Wes-Cape/TBF (Table Mountain Fund) impact study for the development/ agricultural activities in the Upper Breede River (Slanghoek area) was conducted under the auspices of an environmental consultant in Worcester. An area-wide management plan on land that is suitable for development and land that should be retained for conservation will be compiled in light of this study. The vast majority of farmers in the study area are involved, but some preferred not to participate in the process.
At the same time an environmental management plan is also being compiled for the Sandveld area. Agri Wes-Cape is a member of the project management team that will draft the plan.
During the year commentary was also submitted via Agri SA on the NEMA Amendment Bill and environmental studies. 75
Agri Wes-Cape had the opportunity, in conjunction with Agri SA, to make a submission to the Portfolio Committee (Water and Environmental Affairs): Rethinking Agri –Environmental Management: Lessons and perspectives from the WC – what is different about farming?
2.2.4.2 TFB Langtou River
The draft plan for the management of the Langtou River has been finalised and submitted to farmers along the river for implementation. The Department of Environmental Affairs, which must give permission for the repair of damage caused to infrastructure by the flood, as well as other role players, were provided with copies of the plan. The relevant farmers now have a valuable set of guidelines according to which repairs and maintenance can be done. The Western Cape Department of Agriculture has undertaken to assist with the re-establishment of vegetation along rivers. In terms of the plan, the riparian owners will remain responsible for maintaining the river.
2.2.4.3 Wind energy/ solar energy
Both the national Department of Agriculture and Eskom have compiled documents on the policy /minimum regulations and requirements relating to renewable energy generated on small scale on agricultural land for own use or for incorporation into the existing Eskom system. The particulars were distributed to affiliates. Both documents are in draft form and will be finalised soon.
2.2.4.4 Hydro-fracturing/Shale gas
Representatives of Shell made a submission at national level on the status of Shell’s application for a permit for shale-gas exploration in the Karoo. Application was made for prospecting on approximately 90 000 hectares, very little of which fall within the Western Cape. The gas to be extracted will probably be used as supplementary source for electricity generation. There is no certainty that the extraction of gas would be economically viable or where the water to be used will come from. Shell has undertaken to work in a responsible and safe manner and would only do prospecting after consultation with the relevant land owners.
Agri SA negotiates holistically with the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy Affairs for the best possible economic protection of producers and the protection of sensitive ecological systems in the Karoo.
The Department of Mineral Resources and Energy Affairs’ proposed technical regulations for petroleum exploration and extraction were
76
sent to affiliates. The technical regulations must be in place before prospecting can commence.
2.2.4.5 Weed control
The Committee supports the Western Cape Department of Agriculture’s view regarding the implementation of the Conservation of Agricultural Resources Act (Act No. 43 of 1980), in terms of which any undesirable plant (such as Satan’s bush) on agricultural land should be eradicated.
Agri SA is involved in the revision of the Conservation of Agricultural Resources Act.
2.2.4.6 Flood damage and drought relief
Agri Wes-Cape provided assistance during the recent floods in the Karoo (January 2014). With regard to drought relief, Western Cape farmers donated feed to fellow farmers in North West and the Northern Cape.
2.2.4.7 Mining matters
Agri SA has expressed its disappointment with the Constitutional Court ruling on the mineral rights ownership dispensation and has followed it up with legal counsel.
2.2.4.8 Water quality
The Water Research Commission’s (WRC) findings on the water quality of rivers, including the Eerste and Berg Rivers, were discussed. Agri SA met with the WRC to discuss ways in which polluted water can be purified. A legal opinion on pollution, especially by local authorities, was requested.
The committee recommended that producers attend to biosecurity measures in relation to irrigation water on farms. Agricultural associations must also exert pressure on local authorities to manage sewage farms according to the requirement in order to limit and prevent pollution of water resources. Agricultural associations, water user associations and municipalities must make a concerted effort to monitor the quality of water in rivers on an ongoing basis.
Agri SA’s focus is not on litigation but rather on obtaining clarity as to what the state’s obligations are in terms of the Constitution and the Water Act, and also to establish the risks to using irrigation water that may be biologically polluted. A possible consequence of pollution caused by sewerage farms is that farmers who use the water for crop irrigation in terms of other legislation may be held liable and the products marketed could pose health risks.
77
In the meantime City cape Town has also made a submission entitled “The importance of Good Stormwater and River Water Quality” available. Although City Cape Town co-operates with adjacent municipalities, with monitoring points in urban areas, it is not always possible to determine where the pollution takes place. Agri Wes- Cape has promised to co-operate with regard to proactive and sound management of water resources and will refer City Cape Town to the relevant agricultural association if a source of pollution is identified in agriculture.
2.2.4.9 Review of national water policy
Agri SA in continuously involved in the review of national water policy (water rights reform). The purpose of the review is “to provide for improved access to water, equity and sustainability”. The committee was also of the opinion that the mechanism for transferring existing (effective) water rights should be retained and that it should be transparently applied.
The proposed national water policy was submitted to Cabinet during March 2014 without Agri SA having been consulted. The policy changes will now be incorporated in the amendment bill, after which a new water strategy will have to be developed. Agri SA will again attempt to provide inputs at that level.
2.2.4.10 Provincial coastal management plan
A new provincial Coastal Management Plan is currently being considered. Affiliates in the coastal areas were requested to register as interest groups with the process so that they can be kept abreast of progress made in this regard. They were also requested to comment on draft documents which would be made available in due course. The proposed study area extends from the coast to the first watershed.
2.2.5 Rural safety
2.2.5.1 Farm protocol
Agricultural association members are always advised to adhere strictly to Agri SA’s protocol for access to farms. When the protocol access notices are in place, land owners may take action against persons who access the property illegally or without making an appointment. If you add the SAPS farm number, SAPS will be able to identify farms more easily and so-doing improve service delivery.
During the report year Agri SA changed the farm access protocol slightly (without affecting farm safety) to accommodate the proposals of the Department of Labour regarding access for labour inspectors. A preamble was added to the introductory section of the
78
protocol and amended accordingly. The revised protocol was forwarded to affiliates.
Agri SA had addressed a letter to the national Minister of Police about the labour strikes in the Western Cape, to which the minister responded as follows: “I have instructed staff in my office to get into contact with your organisation and the other stakeholders to work out the finer details of what needs to be done to ensure the normalisation of industrial relations in the farming sector”.
Eskom has its own protocol which was compiled for their contractors. The particulars thereof should be available at Eskom’s offices in rural areas. Complaints regarding problems caused by contractors may be submitted to Agri Wes-Cape, after which the organisation will immediately follow up with Eskom and where possible address such problems.
Agri Wes-Cape is in discussion with the provincial Department of Transport in an attempt to get access control introduced on auxiliary roads during public unrest. Unfortunately the provincial ordinance currently does not make provision for such a system. A similar system was introduced in a neighbouring province where manned control points were erected to provide access control to protect rural residents.
2.2.5.2 Trespassing on property
Before the 2014 election an agreement was reached between Agri SA and the IEC (Independent Electoral Commission) in which the rules for gaining access to farms for electioneering purposes were set out. The information was communicated to all agricultural associations.
Information regarding action to be taken in the event of a land invasion was also circulated, namely “…trespassers must be arrested as soon as possible by die SAPD when a complaint of trespassing was lodged…”
2.2.5.3 Co-ordination of crime trends
At each committee meeting SAPS Crime Intelligence provides feedback on crime statistics and trends in the province, with reference to farm incidents, murders, rapes, burglaries, theft (data has also been requested regarding theft of firearms, trespassing, arson, cable theft and theft of fencing and irrigation material). Producers were again urged to report all forms of crime in rural areas to assist SAPS with its planning, service delivery and actions so as to ensure optimal use of manpower and equipment.
Regular feedback is provided on stock theft cases in the province during provincial Stock Theft committee meetings, with specific reference to the trends thereof as well as convictions and sentences. 79
Complainants must ensure that a MAS number is issued when an incident is reported. The SAPS investigating officer has a duty to keep complainants informed of progress made with a case on a regular basis.
SAPS, however, requests land owners to have security measures and structures in place for the protection of property. Information documentation is distributed regularly to affiliates by SAPS and Agri Wes-Cape. These documents cover a variety of aspects, for example home protection and contingency planning. Agricultural associations must also test radio systems regularly and ensure that the systems are and remain functional.
The committee has granted a mandate for an inquiry into the functioning of a Security Desk similar those already in place in other provinces. The Desk focuses on proactive and preventative measures, which also entails gathering information and identifying trends at grassroots level in rural areas in close collaboration with agricultural associations with a view to launching proactive operations in consultation with SAPS.
2.2.5.4 Copper theft/ Scrap metal dealers
With the new Second-Hand Goods Act and accompanying regulations, stringent measures have been put in place but the implementation thereof is still not satisfactory. A coordinating structure was formed between the affected role players according to which SAPS directs its actions.
In terms of the legislation, SAPS may pay regular visits to scrap dealers to check their stock and registers for possible unlawful trade. There has been a call for the involvement of the Asset Forfeiture Unit to expose illegal trade and to act against scrap dealers who are found to be guilty.
2.2.5.5 SAPS National Rural Protection Strategy
The Rural Protection Strategy was implemented during the previous report year at 20 SAPS stations in the province. The file of documents on the implementation of the strategy was provided to affiliates (for the purpose of forging co-operation and building a partnership relationship between rural communities and the police).
Agri Wes-Cape conducted a survey among agricultural associations within the jurisdiction of the 20 SAPS stations to gather details regarding their experiences. Only 45% of the agricultural associations were aware that the strategy had been rolled out, while 70% indicated that they were part of the local GPF structures. SAPS undertook to follow up and to address the matter via the Provincial Commissioner. Agri Wes-Cape made sure that the contact details of 80
the relevant agricultural associations and sector commanders were known to both parties so that they could be invited to meetings with a view to facilitating better co-operation.
2.2.5.6 Farm watch training for farm workers
Discussions also focused on the training of farm workers incorporated into farmwatch structures. Farm workers who have been trained in this way could be used for gathering information and patrolling the environment. The farmwatch forms part of the GPF structure, in the same way as the neighbourhood watch in cities and town. It is now also a requirement that the respective farmwatches in the SAPS station’s area must register and be incorporated into the GPF or sub-GPF structure for rural areas.
The farm workers who are trained and used in this way must be insured against injuries/ accidents while on duty. The insurance product which T&E Finops (family protector) made available to Agri SA can be considered for this purpose. Full details have been sent to the affiliates.
2.2.5.7 Reservist policy framework
The reservist policy was approved during the past year after long delays. Detailed information and instructions for finalisation thereof and recruitment of reservists were still awaited. The reservist policy forms a major part of the Rural Protection Strategy.
2.2.5.8 Provincial Joints
The Committee objected to the fact that the Western Cape provincial commissioner refused to allow agriculture to be represented in the provincial Joint (other provinces have representation). Heads of state departments, together with SAPS, form the Provincial Joints. The Rural Protection Strategy stipulates that SAPS must also involve organised agriculture. The Joints are statutory institutions that must hold monthly meetings where rural safety is a standing item on the agenda.
The chair of the Priority Committee: Rural Protection must report to the Joint on the Priority Committee’s report. The latter must be chaired by a senior officer with the rank of brigadier or higher, which is currently not the case. This contributes to the fact that the Priority Committee in the Western Cape cannot function properly.
2.2.5.9 Sector policing
It was also noted that SAPS was planning workshops in the respective provinces around the implementation of sector policing (the concept used by the police to implement community and partnership policing
81
in smaller sectors). It was recommended that all state departments be compelled to attend the workshops.
Agri Wes-Cape’s award – the Lt-Col. Ernst Bester MMM, JCD floating trophy for the best SAPS Cluster in the Western Cape for 2013 – was presented to SAPS Ladismith (D/O WH Binnedell).
2.2.5.10Discussion: Agri SA and AfriForum
Discussions took place at national level between Agri SA and AfriForum. Agri SA serves as an agricultural community organisation which influences agricultural policy to the benefit of all farmers, while AfriForum is a civil rights organisation that tries to protect the rights of individuals. During the discussion, AfriForum made it very clear that it is not their strategy to become involved in agriculture. For this reason they cannot accept agricultural associations as members or affiliates; only individuals may join. It was further agreed that the parties would act within their respective mandates to address rural safety.
2.2.5.11Firearm legislation/ J 534 fines
The lack of clarity around the allegation that J534 fines issued to farmers, among others for non-compliance with the requirements of the Animal Identification Act, would prejudice the renewal of firearm licences was followed up with SAPS. Clarification was obtain to the effect that this was not the case and that a person may not be declared incompetent to own a firearm if a J534 fine had been issued to him/ her in terms of the Animal Identification Act.
2.2.5.12 Provincial Stock Theft Committee
A full report on the provincial Stock Theft Committee’s activities is included in the Red Meat Producers’ Organisation’s annual report, which is available on request.
2.2.6 Communication and Image-building Policy Committee
2.2.6.1 Communication strategy
Detailed feedback on all activities was provided during the 2014 Agri Wes-Cape regional congresses/ information sessions.
The Agri Wes-Cape Communication strategy is aimed at the following:
• To improve the organisation’s internal and external communication and to address the diverse needs of organised agriculture and its affiliates; • Image-building actions take place in various ways, including good management of the media; 82
• To ensure that factually correct and relevant reports are placed; and • Discussions are held with journalists to provide information but also to cultivate a better understanding of the variety, complexity and diversity of the sector; • Certain reporting on sensitive issues (such as the labour unrest and strikes in agriculture) and press statements are issued only after careful consideration and in-depth consultation with communication experts.
Existing opportunities to reflect a positive image of the agricultural sector include competitions in which Agri Wes-cape is involved, for example: - Farmer of the year - Woman farmer of the year - Young farmer of the year - Farm worker of the year - Commodity-specific competitions - SAPS Sector Policing: Best SAPS station - Best SAPS Stock Theft Unit and member
During the past year special efforts were again made to invite members and their spouses to the regional congresses/ information sessions. Attendance is still not satisfactory and the event needs more involvement from affiliates and their members. The board of directors also discussed relevance and format of the information sessions (regional congresses).
Various forms of communication and information resources were used to make effective and regular communication with members and interest groups possible, including the following:
- Webpage - regularly updated – participation of members still poor; - Social networks such as Facebook and Twitter – good progress was made and it serves as a good system to monitor people’s interest in / perceptions of the sector; - Corporate brochure; - Electronic newsletter to members; - Agri Wes-Cape value-added document; - Visits to agricultural associations; - A series of 27 labour newsletters was completed during the past year and is available on the closed members’ section of Agri Wes-Cape’s webpage.
2.2.6.2 Agri SA communication and marketing strategy
Draft FCB, a public relations and communication company, was approached at national level to create a communication and marketing strategy for Agri SA. Agri SA and ASUF accepted the
83
proposal and funds were made available for the first phase of the project (perception survey), but Agbiz indicated that they do not support the proposal.
It was also decided at national level to develop an agricultural programme for community radio stations in consultation with Agri Connect. The project will also be tackled in phases and proposals are requested for this purpose.
Agri SA has succeeded in making its magazine Agri financially strong. The magazine is well received by readers and advertisers and in 2013 it was entered for the PICA award in the “Musies to Musies’ category. Agri received a “highly commendable“ certificate.
In 2014 Agri SA celebrates its 110th anniversary and certain special activities are planned in the course of the year.
2.2.6.3 Involvement in agricultural shows
During September 2013 Agri SA and Agri Wes-Cape jointly manned the organised agriculture stall during NAMPO in Bothaville and Agri Mega Week in Bredasdorp. The event was experienced as positive and will, where possible, again be used in 2014.
------oooOOOooo------
84
Affiliates of Agri Wes-Cape
CONSTITUTING ORGANISATION
• Western Cape Agricultural Commodity Chamber
Special associations / Producer/Commodity organisations
- Agri Expo - Berg River Table Grape Producer Association - Dried Fruit Technical Services - GSA Winter Rainfall Region - Canned Fruit Producer Association - Cape Pig Producers’ Association - Guava Producers’ Association - MPO Western Cape - National Wool Growers’ Association (Western Cape) - RPO Western Cape - SAPPEX - SA Apple and Pear Producers’ Association - SA Honey Bush Tea Producers’ Association - SA Olive - SA Stone-Fruit Association - SA table grape producers’ industry - Hortgro Services - Sandveld Potato Growers’ Organisation (SAPGO) - Vinpro - Vroue Landbou-Unie of the Cape - SA Ostrich Business Chamber - Western Cape Bee Industry Association
• Agri Wes-Cape General Affairs Chamber
- Directly affiliated agricultural associations o Agri Uniondale o Agter-Pakhuis agricultural association o Bitterfontein agricultural association o Citrusdal agricultural association o Darling agricultural association o Durbanville agricultural association o EGV & V agricultural association o Franschhoek agricultural association o Goudini agricultural association o Graafwater / Leipoldtville agricultural association o Hermon agricultural association o Hex Valley producers’ association o Hopefield agricultural association o Cape Flats agricultural association o Kliprand agricultural association 85
o Landplaas agricultural association o Lutzville agricultural association o Malmesbury agricultural association o Moorreesburg agricultural association o Nardouwsberg agricultural association o Olyfenboschkraal agricultural association o Paarl agricultural association o Philadelphia agricultural association o Riebeeck agricultural association o Sandveld farmers and wool growers’ association o Stellenbosch agricultural society o Trimoa / Trawal agricultural association o Vanrhynsdorp agricultural association o Vredenburg agricultural association o Vredendal agricultural association o Wellington agricultural association
- Affiliated district agricultural association o Agri Klein Karoo o Agri Witzenberg o Beaufort West district agricultural association o Breë River Valley district agricultural association o Heidelberg district agricultural association o Little Karoo West district agricultural association o Koup district agricultural association o Murraysburg district agricultural and wool growers’ association o Overberg district agricultural association o Piket district agricultural association o Riversdale district agricultural association o Swellendam district agricultural association o Garden Route district agricultural association o Winelands district agricultural association
- Indirectly affiliated agricultural associations . Albertinia agricultural association . Agri Avontuur . Agri Bo-Kamanassie . Agri Calitzdorp / Vlei River . Agri De Rust . Agri Herold . Agri Kangovalleie . Agri Ladismith . Agri Nelspoort . Agri Oudtshoorn . Agri Volmoed . Babilonstoring agricultural association . Barrydale agricultural association . Upper-Buffels River agricultural association . Bonnievale / Middel River agricultural association . Brak River agricultural association . Brandwacht agricultural association 86
. Bredasdorp agricultural and wool growers’ association . Breë River agricultural association . Buffeljags River agricultural association . Caledon/ Jongensklip agricultural association . Caledon North agricultural association . Ceres Koue Bokkeveld agricultural association . Ceres Witzenberg agricultural association . Die Vlakte agricultural association . Dipka agricultural association . Eendekuil agricultural association . Heidelberg/Krombeksrivier agricultural association . Herbertsdale agricultural association . Het Kruis agricultural association . Klein-Swartberg agricultural association . Knysna agricultural association . Koo agricultural association . Koue Bokkeveld agricultural association . Koup No.4 agricultural association . Kwaggaskloof agricultural association . La Chasseur / Agter-Kliphoogte agricultural association . Laer Buffels River agricultural association . Laer Sneeuberg agricultural association . Laingsburg agricultural association . Letjiesbos agricultural association . McGregor agricultural association . Merweville agricultural association . Montagu agricultural association . Moorreesburg agricultural association . Napier agricultural association . Nuweveld agricultural association . Olifantsberg agricultural association . Outeniqualand agricultural association . Overhex agricultural association . Piketberg agricultural association . Piket Bo-Berg agricultural association . Piket table grape agricultural association . Plettenberg Bay agricultural association . Porterville agricultural association . Prince Albert agricultural association . Rietbron agricultural association . Riversdale North agricultural association . Riviersonderend agricultural association . Robertson agricultural association . Ruggens agricultural association . Saamstaan agricultural association . Stanford agricultural association . Strandveld agricultural association . Tulbagh agricultural association . Vink River agricultural association . Voëlvlei agricultural association . Warm Bokkeveld agricultural association 87
. Wolseley agricultural association
- Junior agricultural associations o Augsburg Junior agricultural association o Boland Junior agricultural association o Elsenburg Junior agricultural association o Oakdale Junior agricultural association o Saasveld Junior agricultural association o CPUT Wellington campus o Swartberg High School o NMMU (PE)
• Agricultural Business Chamber (Western Cape)
The Agri Wes-Cape constitution makes provision for a chamber where agribusinesses and co-ops can form part of the organised agriculture structure. The Agricultural Business Chamber (Western Cape) is currently not functional, i.e. it has not affiliates.
AGRI WES-CAPE REPRESENTATION
- Agri SA
• General Affairs Chamber CJU (Cornie) Swart (President) DJ (Niël) Joubert (Vice President) CB (Carl) Opperman (CEO)
• Policy committees Commercial: DJ (Niël) Joubert Labour / Social: DN (Neil) Hamman Transformation: CB (Carl) Opperman Natural Resources: JS (Johan) Bothma Rural Safety: Uys van der Westhuijzen / JS (Johan) Bothma Communication and Image-building: CB (Carl) Opperman
- Provincial • Economic affairs/ Development
WESGRO: CB (Carl) Opperman
EDC CJT (Chris) Krone / CB (Carl) Opperman
• Provincial disaster management (only on invitation) CB (Carl) Opperman / JS (Johan) Bothma
• Provincial priority committee: Rural Protection JS (Johan) Bothma
88
• Provincial priority committee: Copper Cable Theft JS (Johan) Bothma
• Provincial Stock Theft RPO: TDP (Theunis) Smit NWGA: MJ (Thys) Delport MPO: M (Martin) Voigt CPPA: PR (Pauli) Heins Ostrich business Chamber: P (Piet) Kleyn
• Provincial PMF RPO: JW (John) Dürr / D (Dean) Heyns / A (Andries) le Roux NWGA: MJ (Thys) Delport
• Department of Agriculture (Western Cape) Elsenburg College Council: JA (Kosie) Loubser
District municipalities
• Cape Winelands Biodiversity Plan Working Group G de V (Gawie) du Bois
89
AWARDS AND COMPETITIONS
Agri Wes-Cape honorary awards
YEAR PERSON TYPE OF AWARD
1986 EP Robertson Honorary Presidency 1987 JF Krone Honorary Presidency 1989 JA Jooste Honorary award 1990 GJ Malherbe Honorary Presidency 1992 FJ Malan (Sr) Honorary Presidency 1993 GA Aggenbach Honorary award P Zietsman Honorary award De Vos Rabie Honorary award Willem Britz Honorary award 1994 Pietman Hugo Honorary award Emile van Papendorp Honorary award Alwyn van der Merwe Honorary award 1995 Japie Neethling Honorary award 1996 Dr Kraai van Niekerk Honorary award 1997 GS Bosch Honorary award CJ du Toit Honorary Presidency 2002 GA Aggenbach Honorary Vice Chairmanship 2005 JA Loubser Honorary Vice Presidency HG van Rensburg Honorary Presidency 2007 Johan Blomerus Honorary award Chris Venter Honorary award 2009 AC (Christof) Cloete Honorary Presidency 2010 E (Ernst) Bester Honorary Vice Presidenvy 2013 JA (Kosie) Loubser (sr) Honorary Presidency NH (Neil) Hamman (sr) Honorary Vice Presidency
Agri Wes-Cape honorary awards: Regional Executive members: General Affairs Chamber
Agri Wes-Cape General Affairs Chamber recognition of regional executive members
The General Affairs Chamber Executive decided in 2009 that Agri Wes-Cape regional executive members would be recognised for their terms of office as regional representatives. This means regional executive members would be recognised as from the inception of the then Western Cape Agricultural union in 1980, later known as Agriculture Western Cape and currently as Agri Wes- Cape, according to four categories of years’ service, namely:
Platinum: 15 years and more Gold: 10 to 14 years Silver: 5 to 9 years Bronze: 1 to 4 years 90
It was further decided that regional executive members who had served for 10 or more years (Gold and Platinum awards) in the Agri Wes-Cape General Affairs Chamber would be honoured annually during the Agri Wes-Cape annual congress. Executive members who had served for shorter terms (i.e. Silver and Bronze) would be presented with their awards during the Agri Wes- Cape regional congresses. This arrangement commenced at the 2008 Agri Wes-Cape annual congress and was continued during the past 2009 Agri Wes-Cape regional congresses.
Awards were presented to the following people:
Platinum Lourens PZ (Pietman) NJ (Niekie) Mouton
Gold Botha A (Abrie) Human JH (Sextus) (Posthumous) Krone CJT (Chris) Le Roux FJD (Frans) Le Roux JG (Jannie) Luttig S (Samie) Terblanche P (Peet) Van den Berg, JA (Kotie)
Silver Aggenbach WA (Willem) Archer RRE (Tertius) Baard (Jr) C (Charl) Bester DW (Pien) Britz PJ (Piet) de Jager CA (Bertus) du Bois FG (Francois) du Toit A (Arnoldus) du Toit JJ (Joshua) Fourie DJ (Johan) Geldenhuys ML (Basie) Giliomee JG (Jan) (Posthumous) Hoekstra A (Aat) Hugo PBB (Pieter) Hugo PF (Piet) Jordaan JD (Koos) Joubert JA (Jakobus) Loubser JE de V (Viljee) [Welgegund] Louw JW (Wrensch) Lund P (Pieter) Malan (Jnr.) FJ (Francois) Maree J (Jannie) Mouton J (Johan) Oelofsen RH (Boetie) (Posthumous) Pienaar HH (Hendrik) Rabie De Vos 91
Robertson JE (John) Robertson CB (Niel) Roos T (Tielman) Saayman A (Artho) Theron W du P (Wilhelm) Truter HJ (Hendrik) Uys JK (Kobus) Uys CB (Charles) (Posthumous) van Zyl JG (Jan) van der Westhuizen CA (Corrie) Voigt JG (Johan) Walters JH (Japie) (Posthumous)
Bronze Bekker J (Jac) Botha C (Chrisleo) Bruwer G (Gawie) Carinus DH (Danie) du Bois G (Gawie) du Plessis JP (Jean) (Posthumous) du Toit IB (Sakkie) Heyns R (Radie) Hugo FD (Fransie) Jordaan E (Elza) Kirsten A (André) Malherbe DJ (Basie) Malherbe F (Francois) Rabie MP (Tien) Reinecke Bob Streicher PAM (Posthumous) Theron A (Andries) van der Merwe ABJ (Alwyn) van Papendorp PE (Emile) (Posthumous) van Zyl JJM (Johannes) van der Merwe J (Jim) van der Merwe D (Danie) du T Viljoen J (Kowie)
Best agricultural association, district agricultural association and junior agricultural association
YEAR AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AGRICULTURAL JUNIOR AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION
1984 Warm Bokkeveld Namaqualand No award presented 1985 Bredasdorp Piket No award presented 1986 Paarl Piket Boland AHS 1987 Malmesbury / Prince Suidpunt Boland AHS Albert 92
1988 Malmesbury Riversdale Oakdale AHS 1989 Malmesbury Suidpunt Oakdale AHS 1990 Kamieskroon Namqualand Boland AHS 1991 Kamieskroon Riversdale Augsburg AHS 1992 Kamieskroon Suidpunt Oakdale AHS 1993 Malmesbury Mossel Bay Boland AHS 1994 Malmesbury Riversdale Boland AHS 1995 Philadelphia Outeniqua Boland AHS 1996 Malmesbury Riversdale Boland AHS 1997 Bredasdorp Riversdale Oakdale AHS 1998 Malmesbury Riversdale Oakdale AHS 1999 Bredasdorp Riversdale Boland AHS 2000 Prince Albert Heidelberg Boland AHS 2001 No competition No competition No competition 2002 Malmesbury Riversdale Prince Albert 2003 Malmesbury Heidelberg Augsburg Agricultural Gymnasium 2004 Malmesbury Beaufort West Augsburg agricultural association 2005 Malmesbury Beaufort West No competition 2006 Prince Albert Beaufort West No competition 2007 Prince Albert Agri Klein Karoo No competition 2008 Malmesbury Agri Klein Karoo No competition 2009 Paarl Agri Klein Karoo No competition 2010 Malmesbury Agri Klein Karoo No competition 2011 Malmesbury Agri Klein Karoo No competition 2012 Malmesbury No competition No competition 2013 No competition No competition No competition
Best Speaker: Agri Wes-Cape annual congress (GH Laubscher – Floating trophy: First awarded in 1992)
YEAR WINNER
1992 Pieter Hugo 1993 Artho Saayman 1994 Nokkie Coetzee 1995 Alec Muller 1996 Kotie van den Berg 1997 Jean du Plessis 1998 Nelius van Greunen 1999 Liane Luttig 2000 Heinie du Toit 2001 No competition 2002 Hennie du Plessis 2003 Pieter Strauss 2004 Breyton Milfred 2005 Lieb Scheün 2006 Ms Cariena Terblanche 93
2007 No award presented 2008 No award presented 2009 No award presented 2010 No award presented 2011 No award presented 2012 No award presented 2013 No award presented
Provincial Stock Theft Committee: Award to member for best service delivery (BKB Floating trophy: First awarded in 2004)
Year Rank & Name SAPS Stock Theft Unit
2004 Insp. D Hayes Swellendam Stock Theft Unit 2005 Capt. D Mantshiyane Beaufort West Stock Theft Unit 2006 S/Insp. Piet van der Westhuizen Oudtshoorn Stock Theft Unit 2007 S/Insp. Jurie Hayes Malmesbury Stock Theft Unit 2008 S/Insp. M Grobbelaar Swellendam Stock Theft Unit 2009 S/Insp. SD (Fasie) de Kock Oudtshoorn Stock Theft Unit 2010 S/Insp. BD Adams Malmesbury Stock Theft Unit 2011 S/Sgt JC van den Berg Oudtshoorn Stock Theft Unit 2012 S/Sgt. JC van den Berg Oudtshoorn Stock Theft Unit 2013 S/DO(V) EH Mentoor Oudtshoorn Stock Theft Unit
Provincial Stock Theft Committee: Award for best stock theft unit (BKB Floating trophy: First awarded in 2006)
YEAR SAPS STOCK THEFT UNIT
2006 Oudtshoorn Stock Theft Unit 2007 Malmesbury Stock Theft Unit 2008 Swellendam Stock Theft Unit 2009 Oudtshoorn Stock Theft Unit 2010 Malmesbury Stock Theft Unit 2011 Oudtshoorn Stock Theft Unit 2012 Oudtshoorn Stock Theft Unit 2013 Oudtshoorn Stock Theft Unit
94
Best SAPS Cluster and SAPS Station for Rural Protection
(Lt-Col Ernst Bester MMM, JCD floating trophy since 2010) (First awarded in 2010) 2010 D/O Pierre Hugo SAPS Wellington 2011 Sgt ME de Kock SAPS Villiersdorp 2012 D/O Morne Heunis SAPS George 2013 D/O WH Binnedell SAPS Ladismith
Toyota Young Farmer competition (First awarded in 2005)
YEAR WINNER RUNNER-UP 2005 JE de V Loubser Johannes Joubert 2006 Piet Schoeman Johannes Joubert and Geoffrey Joubert 2007 Robert Graaff 2008 Wouter Beukes 2009 Handrie Conradie 2010 Jan Viljoen 2011 Werner du Plessis 2012 Petrus Bosman 2013 Hannes Toua 2014 Jaco du Toit
95
Acknowledgements
Agri Wes-Cape wishes to acknowledge with thanks and appreciation the co-operation it received during the report year from various persons and organisations, including the following:
- Ministers and their departments within both the provincial and central government.
- Premier and Western Cape legislature
- Municipalities and district municipalities
- All organisations which, by means of donations, contributions and placement of advertisements in Agri Wes-Cape’s publications, made it possible for Agri Wes-Cape to remain of service to the agricultural community.
- The office bearers and personnel of Agri SA.
- Other provincial affiliates of Agri SA, namely Kwanalu, Agri Northern Cape, Agri North west, Agri Eastern Cape, Agri Limpopo, Agri Gauteng, Agri Mpumalanga and Free State Agriculture.
- Affiliates and internal structures of Agri Wes-Cape, namely agricultural associations, district agricultural associations, producer/ commodity organisations, special associations and the Agricultural Business Chamber and all their members. Without their financial and other contributions and support it would have been impossible to continue to exist and function.
- Individuals, who via their membership of a constituting affiliate, are affiliated with Agri Wes-Cape and in particular those who in some or other visible manner demonstrated their willingness to be of service. During the past year we were subject to drastic changes in the environment within which agricultural producers make a living. Without your continued loyalty and willingness also to contribute financially to the maintenance of Agri Wes-Cape, the agricultural community would have lost its voice.
- Office bearers and personnel members of Agri Wes-Cape, who over the years and on so many occasions, often at great personal sacrifice, have contributed to ensure that the interests of organised agriculture are served and strengthened.
- And lastly, we gratefully acknowledge God Almighty, who has guided, led and blessed us liberally and, during the past year, has carried us through both prosperity and adversity. .
96
Reference list Agri Wes-Cape: Various internal reports, memorandums
Agri SA: Various information documents, newsletters, documentation and memorandums
Tables
Table 1: Agri Wes-Cape Personnel
Ps 146:5&6
Blessed is he whose help is the God of Jacob, whose hope is in the LORD his God, The Maker of heaven and earth, the sea, and everything in them-- the LORD, who remains faithful forever.
97