Lon Fuller: Reading List
Lon Fuller: Reading List
[more important articles are italicised]
Articles by Fuller:
1. Lon L. Fuller, ‘Consideration and Form’, 41 Columbia Law Review 799 (1941).
2. Lon L. Fuller, ‘Mediation – Its Forms and Functions’, 44 Southern California Law Review 305 (1970-1971).
3. Lon L. Fuller, ‘The Case of the Speluncean Explorers’, 62 Harvard Law Review 616 (1948-1949).
4. Lon L. Fuller, ‘Collective Bargaining and the Arbitrator’, Wisconsin Law Review 3 (1963).
5. Lon L. Fuller, ‘Reason and Fiat in Case Law’, 59 Harvard Law Review 376 (1945- 1946).
6. Lon L. Fuller, ‘The Forms and Limits of Adjudication’, 92 Harvard Law Review 353 (1978-1979).
7. Lon L. Fuller, ‘An Afterword: Science and the Judicial Process’, 79 Harvard Law Review 1604 (1965-1966).
8. Lon L. Fuller, ‘Human Interaction and the Law’, 14 American Journal of Jurisprudence 1 (1969).
9. Lon L. Fuller, ‘Pashukanis and Vyshinsky: A Study in the Development of Marxian Legal Theory’, 47 Michigan Law Review 1157 (1948-1949).
10. Lon L. Fuller, ‘On Teaching Law’, 3 Stanford Law Review 35 (1950-1951).
11. Lon L. Fuller, ‘Irrigation and Tyranny’, 17 Stanford Law Review 1021 (1964- 1965).
12. Lon L. Fuller, ‘What the Law Schools Can Contribute to the Making of Lawyers’, 1 Journal of Legal Education 189 (1948-1949).
13. Lon L. Fuller, ‘American Legal Philosophy at Mid-Century – A Review of Edwin W. Patterson’s Jurisprudence, Men and Ideas of the Law’, 6 Journal of Legal Education 457 (1953-1954).
14. Lon L. Fuller, ‘Human Purpose and Natural Law’, 3 Natural Law Forum 68 (1958).
15. Lon L. Fuller, ‘A Rejoinder to Professor Nagel’, 3 Natural Law Forum 83 (1958).
16. Lon L. Fuller, ‘Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar in Pennsylvania’, 25 Temple Law Quarterly 249 (1951-1952).
17. Lon L. Fuller, ‘Adjudication and the Rule of Law’, 54 American Society of International Law Proceedings 1 (1960).
18. Lon L. Fuller, ‘The Places and Uses of Jurisprudence in the Law School Curriculum’, 1 Journal of Legal Education 495 (1948-1949).
19. Lon L. Fuller, ‘A Reply to Professors Cohen and Dworkin’, 10 Villanova Law Review 655 (1965).
20. Lon L. Fuller, ‘The Law’s Precarious Hold on Life’, 3 Georgia Law Review 530 (1968-1969).
21. Lon L. Fuller, ‘Williston on Contracts’, 18 North Carolina Law Review 1 (1939- 1940).
22. Lon L. Fuller, ‘Some Reflections on Legal and Economic Freedoms – A Review of Robert L. Hale’s Freedom through Law’, 54 Columbia Law Review 70 (1954).
23. Lon L. Fuller, ‘Freedom – A Suggested Analysis’, 68 Harvard Law Review 1305 (1954-1955).
24. Lon L. Fuller, ‘Law and human interaction’, 1977 Sociological Inquiry 59-90.
25. Lon L. Fuller, ‘Some Observations on the Course in Contracts’, 20 Journal of Legal Education 482 (1967-1968).
26. Lon L. Fuller, ‘Law as an Instrument of Social Control and Law as a Facilitation of Human Interaction’, Brigham Young University Law Review 89 (1975).
27. Lon L. Fuller, ‘Adverse Possession – Occupancy of Another’s Land under Mistake as to Location of a Boundary’, 7 Oregon Law Review 329 (1927-1928).
28. Lon L. Fuller, ‘Moral Right Protections in the Colorization of Black and White Motion Pictures: A Black and White Issue’, 16 Hofstra Law Review 503 (1987-1988).
29. Lon L. Fuller, ‘Positivism and Fidelity to Law – A Reply to Professor Hart’, 71 Harvard Law Review 630 (1957).
30. J.L. Montrose, Maxwell Cohen and Lon L. Fuller, ‘The Academic Lawyer’s House of Intellect’, 14 Journal of Legal Education 125 (1961-1962).
31. John E. Coons, Francis A. Allen, Paul A. Freund and Lon L. Fuller, etc., ‘Comments on Approaches to Court Imposed Compromise – The Uses of Doubt and Reason’, 58 Northwestern University Law Review 795 (1963-1964).
Articles relating to Fuller’s work:
1. Peter Read Teachout, ‘The Soul of the Fugue: An Essay on Reading Fuller’, 70 Minnesota Law Review 1073 (1985-1986).
2. Samuel Mermin, ‘On Defining Law – A Dissent from Fuller’s Approach’, 6 Indiana Law Review 683 (1972-1973).
3. Joel Newman, ‘Fuller Knows Best: Parenting and Fuller’s Definition of Law’, 20 Wake Forest Law Review 645 (1984).
4. Melvin Aron Eisenberg, ‘Participation, Responsiveness, and the Consultative Process: An Essay for Lon Fuller’, 92 Harvard Law Review 410 (1978-1979).
5. Anthony D’Amato, ‘Lon Fuller and Substantive Natural Law’, 26 American Journal of Jurisprudence 202 (1981).
6. Robert C.L. Moffat, ‘Lon Fuller: Natural Lawyer after All’, 26 American Journal of Jurisprudence 190 (1981).
7. James Boyle, ‘Legal Realism and the Social Contract: Fuller’s Public Jurisprudence of Form Private Jurisprudence of Substance’, 78 Cornell Law Review 371 (1992- 1993).
8. John M.A. DiPippa, ‘Lon Fuller, the Model Code, and the Model Rules’, 37 South Texas Law Review 303 (1996).
9. Ian R. Macneil, ‘Lon Fuller: Nexusist’, 26 American Journal of Jurisprudence 219 (1981).
10. Duncan Kennedy, ‘From the Will Theory to the Principle of Private Autonomy: Lon Fuller’s Consideration and Form’, 100 Columbia Law Review 94 (2000).
11. Robert G. Bone, ‘Lon Fuller’s Theory of Adjudication and the False Dichotomy between Dispute Resolution and Public Law Models of Litigation’, 75 Boston University Law Review 1273 (1995).
12. Douglas Sturm, ‘Lon Fuller’s Multidimensional Natural Law Theory’, 18 Stanford Law Review 612 (1965-1966).
13. Jay Ellis and Alison FitzGerald, ‘The Precautionary Principle in International Law: Lessons from Fuller’s Internal Morality’, 49 McGill Law Journal 779 (2003-2004).
14. Jeremy Waldron, ‘Positivism and Legality: Hart’s Equivocal Response to Fuller’, 83 New York University Law Review 1135 (2008).
15. Richard Craswell, ‘Against Fuller and Perdue’, 67 University of Chicago Law Review 99 (2000).
16. Robert Henle, ‘Principles of Legality: Qualities of Law – Lon Fuller, St Thomas Aquinas, St Isidore of Seville’, 39 American Journal of Jurisprudence 47 (1994).
17. David Luban, ‘Rediscovering Fuller’s Legal Ethics’, 11 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 801 (1997-1998).
18. Matthew Kramer, ‘Scrupulousness without Scruples: A Critique of Lon Fuller and His Defenders’, 18 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 235 (1998).
19. Myres S. McDougal, ‘Fuller v. the American Legal Realists: An Intervention’, 50 Yale Law Journal 827 (1940-1941).
20. Robert C.L. Moffat, ‘The Perils of Positivism Or Lon Fuller’s Lesson on Looking at Law: Neither Science Nor Mystery – Merely Method’, 10 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 295 (1987).
21. J.W.F. Allison, ‘Fuller’s Analysis of Polycentric Disputes and the Limits of Adjudication’, 53 Cambridge Law Journal 367 (1994).
22. Kenneth I. Winston, ‘Is/Ought Redux: The Pragmatist Context of Lon Fuller’s Conception of Law’, 8 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 329 (1988).
23. Jamie Cassels, ‘Lon Fuller: Liberalism and the Limits of Law’, 36 University of Toronto Law Journal 318 (1986).
24. Paul A. LeBel, ‘Blame This Messenger: Summers on Fuller’, 83 Michigan Law Review 717 (1984-1985).
25. William F. Cahill, ‘One Phase of the New Debate on the Iniquitous Law – Hart and Fuller on Radbruch’, 5 Catholic Lawyer 119 (1959).
26. Liam Murphy, ‘Better to See Law This Way’, 83 New York University Law Review 1088 (2008).
27. Leslie Green, ‘Positivism and the Inseparability of Law and Morals’, 83 New York University Law Review 1035 (2008).
28. Mark Bennett, ‘The Rule of Law Means Literally What It Says: The Rule of the Law: Fuller and Raz on Formal Legality and the Concept of Law’, 32 Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 90 (2007).
29. James C. Ketchen, ‘Revisiting Fuller’s Critique of Hart-Managerial Control and the Pathology of Legal Systems: The Hart-Weber Nexus’, 53 University of Toronto Law Journal 1 (2003).
30. Robert P. Burns, ‘The Appropriateness of Mediation: A Case Study and Reflection on Fuller and Fiss’, 4 Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 129 (1988- 1989).
31. Frederick Schauer, ‘A Critical Guide to Vehicles in the Park’, 83 New York University Law Review 1109 (2008).
32. Robert S. Summers, ‘Summers’s Primer on Fuller’s Jurisprudence – A Wholly Disinterested Assessment of the Reviews of Professors Wueste and LeBel’, 71 Cornell Law Review 1231 (1985-1986).
33. Daniel E. Wueste, ‘Fuller’s Processual Philosophy of Law’, 71 Cornell Law Review 1205 (1985-1986).
34. Nicola Lacey, ‘Philosophy, Political Morality, and History: Explaining the Enduring Resonance of the Hart-Fuller Debate’, 83 New York University Law Review 1059 (2008).
35. Robert S. Summers, ‘Fuller on Legal Education’, 34 Journal of Legal Education 8 (1984).
36. James F. Bresnahan, ‘Ethics and the Study and Practice of Law: The Problem of Being Professional in a Fuller Sense’, 28 Journal of Legal Education 189 (1976-1977).
37. George Anastaplo, ‘Natural Right and the American Lawyer: An Appreciation of Professor Fuller’, Wisconsin Law Review 322 (1965).
38. Ronald Dworkin, ‘Philosophy, Morality and Law – Observations Prompted by Professor Fuller’s Novel Claim’, 113 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 668 (1964-1965).
39. Robert S. Summers, ‘Professor Fuller’s Jurisprudence and America’s Dominant Philosophy of Law’, 92 Harvard Law Review 433 (1978-1979).
40. Joseph Mendola, ‘Hart, Fuller, Dworkin, and Fragile Norms’, 52 SMU Law Review 111 (1999).
41. David Dyzenhaus, ‘The Grudge Informer Case Revisited’, 83 New York University Law Review 1000 (2008).
42. Bernard W. Bell, ‘No Motor Vehicles in the Park: Reviving the Hart-Fuller Debate to Introduce Statutory Construction’, 48 Journal of Legal Education 88 (1998).
43. W. David Slawson, ‘Why Expectation Damages for Breach of Contract Must Be the Norm: A Refutation of the Fuller and Perdue Three Interests Thesis’, 81 Nebraska Law Review 839 (2002-2003).
44. Charles L. Palms, ‘The Natural Law Philosophy of Lon L. Fuller’, 11 Catholic Lawyer 94 (1965).
45. Larry A. DiMatteo, ‘The History of Natural Law Theory: Transforming Embedded Influences into a Fuller Understanding of Modern Contract Law’, 60 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 839 (1998-1999).
46. Benjamin C. Zipursky, ‘Practical Positivism Versus Practical Perfectionism: The Hart-Fuller Debate at Fifty’, 83 New York University Law Review 1170 (2008).
47. Ernest Nagel, ‘On the Fusion of Fact and Value: A Reply to Professor Fuller’, 3 Natural Law Forum 77 (1958).
48. Donald A. Giannella, ‘Thoughts on the Symposium: The Morality of Law’, 10 Villanova Law Review 676 (1965).
49. George Nakhnikian, ‘Professor Fuller on Legal Rules and Purpose’, 2 Wayne Law Review 190 (1955-1956).
50. E. Russell Naughton, ‘Regarding the Symposium on Law and Morality’, 10 Villanova Law Review 671 (1965).
51. John E. Murray Jr., ‘Observations on the Morality of Law’, 10 Villanova Law Review 667 (1965).
52. Francis H. Parker, ‘Remarks on the Symposium: The Morality of Law’, 10 Villanova Law Review 673 (1965).
53. Marshall Cohen, ‘Law, Morality and Purpose’, 10 Villanova Law Review 640 (1965).
54. George Breckenridge, ‘Legal Positivism and the Natural Law: The Controversy between Professor Hart and Professor Fuller’, 18 Vanderbilt Law Review 945 (1964- 1965).
55. Robert S. Summers, ‘Professor Fuller on Morality and Law’, 18 Journal of Legal Education 1 (1965-1966).
56. John E. Murray Jr., ‘Introduction to the Morality of Law’, 10 Villanova Law Review 624 (1965).
57. Ronald M. Dworkin, ‘The Elusive Morality of Law’, 10 Villanova Law Review 631 (1965).