DOCSLIB.ORG

Fauna Survey (Level 2)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fauna Survey (Level 2) Fauna Survey (Level 2) Phase 1 (November 2013) and Phase 2 (March 2014) Medcalf Vanadium Mining Project Audalia Resources Ltd NOVEMBER 2017 Report Number: SF 009534 B VERSION 2 On behalf of: Audalia Resources Limited PO Box 354 WEST PERTH WA 6872 Prepared by: Greg Harewood Zoologist A.B.N. 95 536 627 336 PO Box 755 BUNBURY WA 6231 M: 0402 141 197 E: [email protected] AUDALIA MEDCALF PROJECT – FAUNA SURVEY - PHASE 1 & 2 – NOVEMBER 2017 – V2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... III 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................... 1 1.2 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................ 1 1.3 SURVEY SCOPE ....................................................................................... 1 2. METHODS ................................................................................................. 3 2.1 FAUNA INVENTORY - DESKTOP REVIEW ............................................. 3 2.1.1 Database Searches ................................................................................ 3 2.1.2 Previous Fauna Surveys in the Area ...................................................... 3 2.2 FAUNA INVENTORY – DETAILED FAUNA SURVEY .............................. 5 2.2.1 Survey Timing and Weather ................................................................... 5 2.2.2 Survey Team........................................................................................... 6 2.2.3 Site Selection .......................................................................................... 6 2.2.4 Ground Fauna Survey ............................................................................. 9 2.2.5 Targeted Survey - Chuditch .................................................................. 11 2.2.6 Bird Surveys ......................................................................................... 11 2.2.7 Targeted Survey - Malleefowl ............................................................... 12 2.2.8 Acoustic Bat Recordings ....................................................................... 12 2.2.9 Motion Sensing Cameras...................................................................... 12 2.2.10 Spotlighting/Head Torching ................................................................. 13 2.2.11 Targeted and Opportunistic Surveys ................................................... 13 2.2.12 Potential Short-Range Endemic Invertebrates .................................... 13 2.3 FAUNA CONSERVATION CATEGORIES .............................................. 14 AUDALIA MEDCALF PROJECT – FAUNA SURVEY - PHASE 1 & 2 – NOVEMBER 2017 – V2 2.4 LIKELIHOOD OF OCCURRENCE – VERTEBRATE FAUNA OF CONSERVATION SIGNIFICANCE .......................................................... 14 2.5 TAXONOMY AND NOMENCLATURE ..................................................... 15 2.6 SURVEY LIMITATIONS ........................................................................... 15 3. REGIONAL CONTEXT ............................................................................ 17 3.1 BIOGEOGRAPHIC SETTING .................................................................. 17 3.2 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT .................................................................... 18 3.2.1 Climate .................................................................................................. 18 3.2.2 Topography, Land Systems and Geology ............................................. 18 3.2.3 Vegetation Mapping .............................................................................. 19 3.3 CONSERVATION RESERVES IN THE AREA ........................................ 19 4. SURVEY RESULTS ................................................................................. 20 4.1 FAUNA INVENTORY - DESKTOP REVIEW ........................................... 20 4.2 FAUNA INVENTORY – DETAILED FAUNA SURVEY ............................ 21 4.2.1 Amphibians ........................................................................................... 22 4.2.2 Reptiles ................................................................................................. 22 4.2.3 Birds ...................................................................................................... 22 4.2.4 Native Non-Volant Mammals ................................................................ 23 4.2.5 Bats ....................................................................................................... 24 4.2.6 Introduced Mammals ............................................................................ 24 4.2.7 Potential Short-Range Endemic Invertebrates ...................................... 24 5. POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON VERTEBRATE FAUNA OF CONSERVATION SIGNIFICANCE ....................................................................................... 26 6. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................... 28 7. REFERENCES ........................................................................................ 30 AUDALIA MEDCALF PROJECT – FAUNA SURVEY - PHASE 1 & 2 – NOVEMBER 2017 – V2 TABLES TABLE 1: Daily Temperatures and Rainfall at the Salmon Gums Weather Station During Phase 1 and Phase 2 Survey Periods (BOM 2014) TABLE 2: Summary of Trap Nights – Phase 1 & 2 TABLE 3: Fauna Survey Limitations and Constraints TABLE 4: Summary of Potential Vertebrate Fauna Species (as listed in Appendix D) TABLE 5: Number of Vertebrate Fauna Species Recorded TABLE 6: Status of SRE Target Invertebrates Collected Within the Study Area TABLE 7: Likelihood of Occurrence and Possible Impacts – Fauna Species of Conservation Significance FIGURES FIGURE 1: Study Area and Surrounds FIGURE 2: Study Area – Air Photo FIGURE 3: Survey Locations FIGURE 4 Mean Monthly Rainfall and Maximum and Minimum Temperatures (Salmon Gums Records 1932 – 2013, BOM 2014) FIGURE 5: Vegetation Communities (courtesy Botanica Consulting) FIGURE 6: Species of Conservation Significance - Observations FIGURE 7: Potential SRE Invertebrates – Collection Sites AUDALIA MEDCALF PROJECT – FAUNA SURVEY - PHASE 1 & 2 – NOVEMBER 2017 – V2 PLATES PLATE 1: Trap Site 1 (Burnt and unburnt Low woodland of Euclayptus salmonophloia over mixed shrubs – Clay Loam Plan bordering major creek line) PLATE 2: Trap Site 2 (Regrowth - mid open mallee woodland of Eucalyptus livida over mid open shrubland and open low shrubland - Hillslope/Hill Crest) PLATE 3: Trap Site 3 (Unburnt Mid mallee shrubland of Eucalyptus spp. over mid shrubland of Melaleuca pauperiflora and mixed low shrubland - Clay-Loam Plain.) PLATE 4: Trap Site 4 (Regrowth - mid open mallee woodland of Eucalyptus livida over mid open shrubland and open low shrubland - Hillslope bordering minor creek line) PLATE 5: Trap Site 5 (Regrowth mixed low shrubland on hillslope – Subtle Hill Slope) PLATE 6: Trap Site 6 (Burnt Low open woodland of Eucalyptus salmonophloia over mixed shrubs on clay loam plain – bordering minor creek line) APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Conservation Categories APPENDIX B: Fauna Trap and Recording Sites – Details APPENDIX C: DBCA & EPBC Database Search Results APPENDIX D: Vertebrate Fauna Observed or Potentially in Study Area APPENDIX E: Raw Vertebrate Trapping & Recording Results APPENDIX F: Invertebrate Specimens Collected APPENDIX G: Invertebrate Report – Phoenix Environmental Sciences (2014) AUDALIA MEDCALF PROJECT – FAUNA SURVEY - PHASE 1 & 2 – NOVEMBER 2017 – V2 Acronyms/Abbreviations: ALA: Atlas of Living Australia www.ala.org.au BA: Birdlife Australia (Formerly RAOU, Birds Australia). BC Bill: Biodiversity Conservation Bill (2015). WA Government. °C: Degrees Celsius. CALM: Department of Conservation and Land Management (now DBCA), WA Government. CAMBA: China Australia Migratory Bird Agreement 1998. CBD: Central Business District. DBCA: Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (formerly DPaW, DEC, CALM, DoE), WA Government DBH: Diametre at Breast Height – tree measurement. DEC: Department of Environment and Conservation (now DBCA), WA Government. DEH: Department of Environment and Heritage (now DotEE), Australian Government. DEP: Department of Environment Protection (now DER), WA Government. DER: Department of Environment Regulation (now DWER), WA Government. DEWHA: Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (now DotEE), Australian Government DMP: Department of Mines and Petroleum (formerly DoIR), WA Government. DoE: Department of Environment (now DWER/DBCA), WA Government. DoP: Department of Planning, WA Government. DotE: Department of the Environment (now DotEE), Australian Government. DotEE: Department of the Environment and Energy (formerly SEWPaC, DWEHA, DEH & DotE), Australian Government. DoIR: Department of Industry and Resources (now DMP), WA Government. DoW: Department of Water (now DWER), WA Government. DPaW: Department of Parks and Wildlife (now DBCA), WA Government. Page i AUDALIA MEDCALF PROJECT – FAUNA SURVEY - PHASE 1 & 2 – NOVEMBER 2017 – V2 DWER: Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (formed by the amalgamation of OEPA, DoW and DER), WA Government. EP Act: Environmental Protection Act 1986, WA Government. EPA: Environmental Protection Authority, WA Government. EPBC Act: Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, Australian Government. ha: Hectare (10,000
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Fauna of Boonanarring Nature Reserve
    The Fauna of Boonanarring Nature Reserve. Tracey Moore, Tracy Sonneman, Alice Reaveley, Karen Bettink, Barbara Wilson. i Department of Parks and Wildlife Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, 6983 Western Australia Telephone: +61-8-9442 0300 Facsimile: +61-8-9386 6399 www.dpaw.wa.gov.au © Government of Western Australia, May 2015 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Department of Parks and Wildlife. Project team: Karen Bettink, Nicole Godfrey, Ben Kreplins, Tracey Moore, Craig Olejnik, Tracy Sonneman, Alice Reaveley, Barbara Wilson Acknowledgements: Astron Environmental Consulting Project contact: Tracey Moore; [email protected] i Table of Contents The fauna of Boonanarring Nature Reserve. ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. Introduction and Background ................................................................................................................. 1 Methods .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Location and vegetation .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fowlers Gap Biodiversity Checklist Reptiles
    Fowlers Gap Biodiversity Checklist ow if there are so many lizards then they should make tasty N meals for someone. Many of the lizard-eaters come from their Reptiles own kind, especially the snake-like legless lizards and the snakes themselves. The former are completely harmless to people but the latter should be left alone and assumed to be venomous. Even so it odern reptiles are at the most diverse in the tropics and the is quite safe to watch a snake from a distance but some like the Md rylands of the world. The Australian arid zone has some of the Mulga Snake can be curious and this could get a little most diverse reptile communities found anywhere. In and around a disconcerting! single tussock of spinifex in the western deserts you could find 18 species of lizards. Fowlers Gap does not have any spinifex but even he most common lizards that you will encounter are the large so you do not have to go far to see reptiles in the warmer weather. Tand ubiquitous Shingleback and Central Bearded Dragon. The diversity here is as astonishing as anywhere. Imagine finding six They both have a tendency to use roads for passage, warming up or species of geckos ranging from 50-85 mm long, all within the same for display. So please slow your vehicle down and then take evasive genus. Or think about a similar diversity of striped skinks from 45-75 action to spare them from becoming a road casualty. The mm long! How do all these lizards make a living in such a dry and Shingleback is often seen alone but actually is monogamous and seemingly unproductive landscape? pairs for life.
    [Show full text]
  • Expert Report of Professor Woinarski
    NOTICE OF FILING This document was lodged electronically in the FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA (FCA) on 18/01/2019 3:23:32 PM AEDT and has been accepted for filing under the Court’s Rules. Details of filing follow and important additional information about these are set out below. Details of Filing Document Lodged: Expert Report File Number: VID1228/2017 File Title: FRIENDS OF LEADBEATER'S POSSUM INC v VICFORESTS Registry: VICTORIA REGISTRY - FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Dated: 18/01/2019 3:23:39 PM AEDT Registrar Important Information As required by the Court’s Rules, this Notice has been inserted as the first page of the document which has been accepted for electronic filing. It is now taken to be part of that document for the purposes of the proceeding in the Court and contains important information for all parties to that proceeding. It must be included in the document served on each of those parties. The date and time of lodgment also shown above are the date and time that the document was received by the Court. Under the Court’s Rules the date of filing of the document is the day it was lodged (if that is a business day for the Registry which accepts it and the document was received by 4.30 pm local time at that Registry) or otherwise the next working day for that Registry. No. VID 1228 of 2017 Federal Court of Australia District Registry: Victoria Division: ACLHR FRIENDS OF LEADBEATER’S POSSUM INC Applicant VICFORESTS Respondent EXPERT REPORT OF PROFESSOR JOHN CASIMIR ZICHY WOINARSKI Contents: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Pirra Jungku Project Species Guide
    The Pirra Jungku Project is a collaboration between the Karajarri Rangers, Environs Kimberley Pirra Jungku Project and the Threatened Species Recovery Hub with funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program and the species guide Western Australian Government’s NRM Program. Reptiles * Asterix means the animal can be tricky to ID. Take a good photo, or bring it back to camp for checking, but do this as a last resort. Don’t bring back any snakes, in case they are poisonous. Dragons Upright posture (stick their heads up), have small, rough scales, each leg has 5 clawed fingers/toes. MATT FROM MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA CC BY 2.0 WIKIMEDIA COMMONS JESSSARAH MILLER LEGGE Slater’s ring-tailed dragon Central military dragon (Ctenophorus slaterii) (Ctenophorus isolepis) Rocky country. Reddish colour with black Sandy country. Very fast on ground. spots on back and dark rings on the tail. Reddish colour with white spots and stripes. JESSCHRISTOPHER MILLER WATSON CC BY SA 3.0 WIKIMEDIA COMMONS ARTHUR CHAPMAN NICOLAS RAKOTOPARE Pindan dragon Horner’s dragon Northern Pilbara tree dragon (Diporiphora pindan) (Lophognathus horneri) (Diporiphora vescus) Thin, slender body. Two long white stripes Ta-ta lizard. White stripe from lip to back legs. Lives in spinifex. Plain colour, sometimes down back that cross over black and orange Tiny white spot in ear. with orange tail, and long white and grey tiger stripes.* stripes down body.* CHRISTOPHERSARAH LEGGE WATSON CC BY SA 3.0 WIKIMEDIA COMMONS Dwarf bearded dragon (Pogona minor) Grey with flat body with spiny edges. Has small spines on either side of the jaw and on the back of the head.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetofauna of the Southern Carnarvon Basin, Western Australia
    DOI: 10.18195/issn.0313-122x.61.2000.335-360 Records of the Western Australian Museum Supplement No. 61: 335-360 (2000). Herpetofauna of the southern Camarvon Basin, Western Australia 2 2 2 N.L. McKenziet, J.K. Rolfet, K.P. Aplin , M.A. Cowan and L.A. Smith 1 Department of Conservation and Land Management, p.a. Box 51, Wanneroo, Western Australia 6065, Australia 2 Western Australian Museum, Francis Street, Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia Abstract - We sampled the frog and reptile species on 63 quadrats chosen to represent the geographical extent and diversity of terrestrial environments in a 75 000 km2 study area in the Carnarvon Basin. Twelve frog and 17 gecko, 10 pygopodid, 16 dragon, 58 skink, four goanna and 16 snake species were recorded, an average of 16.3 species per quadrat. Patterns in species composition were related to biogeographical, ecological and local evolutionary processes. Four species assemblages were distinguished, each relating to gradients in a different set of precipitation plus soil plus topographic attributes. In these terms, Poisson error models with logarithmic links fitted the relationships. Virtually identical patterns emerged when we re-analysed the data using an ecological taxonomy that was based on functional morphology. If evolutionary processes are to be protected along with the ecological and biogeographical processes, the reserve system will need to sample the geographical range of the various rainfall, soil and topographic gradients identified by the analyses. INTRODUCTION patterns in the study area was carried out by This study explores patterns in the composition of Kendrick (1991), for his dissertation on the reptilian and amphibian communities in non- biogeography, ecology and systematic aquatic environments of the southern Carnarvon relationships of the skink genus Lerista.
    [Show full text]
  • Reintroducing the Dingo: the Risk of Dingo Predation to Threatened Vertebrates of Western New South Wales
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Wildlife Research http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WR11128 Reintroducing the dingo: the risk of dingo predation to threatened vertebrates of western New South Wales B. L. Allen A,C and P. J. S. Fleming B AThe University of Queensland, School of Animal Studies, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia. BVertebrate Pest Research Unit, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange Agricultural Institute, Forest Road, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia. CCorresponding author. Present address: Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Sulfide Street, Broken Hill, NSW 2880, Australia. Email: [email protected] Abstract Context. The reintroduction of dingoes into sheep-grazing areas south-east of the dingo barrier fence has been suggested as a mechanism to suppress fox and feral-cat impacts. Using the Western Division of New South Wales as a case study, Dickman et al. (2009) recently assessed the risk of fox and cat predation to extant threatened species and concluded that reintroducing dingoes into the area would have positive effects for most of the threatened vertebrates there, aiding their recovery through trophic cascade effects. However, they did not formally assess the risk of dingo predation to the same threatened species. Aims. To assess the risk of dingo predation to the extant and locally extinct threatened vertebrates of western New South Wales using methods amenable to comparison with Dickman et al. (2009). Methods. The predation-risk assessment method used in Dickman et al. (2009) for foxes and cats was applied here to dingoes, with minor modification to accommodate the dietary differences of dingoes. This method is based on six independent biological attributes, primarily reflective of potential vulnerability characteristics of the prey.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals of the Avon Region
    Mammals of the Avon Region By Mandy Bamford, Rowan Inglis and Katie Watson Foreword by Dr. Tony Friend R N V E M E O N G T E O H F T W A E I S L T A E R R N A U S T 1 2 Contents Foreword 6 Introduction 8 Fauna conservation rankings 25 Species name Common name Family Status Page Tachyglossus aculeatus Short-beaked echidna Tachyglossidae not listed 28 Dasyurus geoffroii Chuditch Dasyuridae vulnerable 30 Phascogale calura Red-tailed phascogale Dasyuridae endangered 32 phascogale tapoatafa Brush-tailed phascogale Dasyuridae vulnerable 34 Ningaui yvonnae Southern ningaui Dasyuridae not listed 36 Antechinomys laniger Kultarr Dasyuridae not listed 38 Sminthopsis crassicaudata Fat-tailed dunnart Dasyuridae not listed 40 Sminthopsis dolichura Little long-tailed dunnart Dasyuridae not listed 42 Sminthopsis gilberti Gilbert’s dunnart Dasyuridae not listed 44 Sminthopsis granulipes White-tailed dunnart Dasyuridae not listed 46 Myrmecobius fasciatus Numbat Myrmecobiidae vulnerable 48 Chaeropus ecaudatus Pig-footed bandicoot Peramelinae presumed extinct 50 Isoodon obesulus Quenda Peramelinae priority 5 52 Species name Common name Family Status Page Perameles bougainville Western-barred bandicoot Peramelinae endangered 54 Macrotis lagotis Bilby Peramelinae vulnerable 56 Cercartetus concinnus Western pygmy possum Burramyidae not listed 58 Tarsipes rostratus Honey possum Tarsipedoidea not listed 60 Trichosurus vulpecula Common brushtail possum Phalangeridae not listed 62 Bettongia lesueur Burrowing bettong Potoroidae vulnerable 64 Potorous platyops Broad-faced
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Overview of the Taxonomy and Nomenclature of the Genus
    Australasian Journal of Herpetology 57 Australasian Journal of Herpetology 34:57-63. ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) Published 20 July 2017. ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) A brief overview of the taxonomy and nomenclature of the genus Diplodactylus Gray 1832 sensu lato, with the formal naming of a new subgenus for the Diplodactylus byrnei Lucas and Frost, 1896 species group and two new species within this subgenus. RAYMOND T. HOSER 488 Park Road, Park Orchards, Victoria, 3134, Australia. Phone: +61 3 9812 3322 Fax: 9812 3355 E-mail: snakeman (at) snakeman.com.au Received 25 March 2017, Accepted 28 May 2017, Published 20 July 2017. ABSTRACT The taxonomy of the genus Diplodactylus Gray 1832 sensu lato was well resolved at the genus level by Oliver et al. (2007) and to a lesser extent other authors over the past 30 years to 2017. However a group known as the Wüster gang as detailed by Hoser (2015a-f) have unlawfully stopped most herpetologists from using taxonomy and nomenclature proposed by authors outside of their mob. As a result names formally proposed by Wells and Wellington (1989) for obvious species groups have been forcibly suppressed in herpetology since they were first published. This has remained the case even after Oliver et al. (2007) confirmed the validity of their genus-level classification in terms of three names they proposed. Taking an ultra-conservative position, Oliver et al. (2007) split Diplodactylus Gray 1832 sensu lato into three genera, using the first available names of Diplodactylus Gray 1832, Lucasium Wermuth, 1965 and Rhynchoedura Günther, 1867 for three main groups that diverged from one another in excess of 20 MYA.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring Within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘I: Synthesis Report
    Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Prepared by Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Hawaii Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817 USA Prepared for EKNA Services Inc. 615 Pi‘ikoi Street, Suite 300 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96814 and State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Airports Division Bishop Museum Technical Report 58 Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i Copyright 2012 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1085-455X Contribution No. 2012 001 to the Hawaii Biological Survey COVER Adult male Hawaiian long-horned wood-borer, Plagithmysus kahului, on its host plant Chenopodium oahuense. This species is endemic to lowland Maui and was discovered during the arthropod surveys. Photograph by Forest and Kim Starr, Makawao, Maui. Used with permission. Hawaii Biological Report on Monitoring Arthropods within Kahului Airport Environs, Synthesis TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents …………….......................................................……………...........……………..…..….i. Executive Summary …….....................................................…………………...........……………..…..….1 Introduction ..................................................................………………………...........……………..…..….4
    [Show full text]
  • Adec Preview Generated PDF File
    V REPTILES AND FROGS OF MARCHAGEE NATURE RESERVE JOHN DELL & A. CHAPMAN Reptiles and frogs were collected opportunistically on Marchagee Nature Reserve (for location and details see Dell, Introduction this report). Collections were made during the dates mentioned by Dell (ibid.). In addition T.M.S. Hanlon and S. Wilson made additional collections on 21 August 1977. Specimens are in the Western Australian Museum and are registered R54479-85, R57775-57864 (May), R51137-54 (July), R57349-54 (August), and R57744-72 (September). In the annotated list we present data on numbers collected, habitat, breeding con­ dition and diet. Snout-vent length (SVL) is given in millimetres and vegetation location numbers and soils are from Muir (this report). ANNOTATED LIST LEPTODACTYLIDAE Heleioporus albopunctatus Three collected in May, 1 in September. Margins of saltlakes; loco 2.1, 7.1, and 7.3 in May, loco 7.8 in September. Males with pigmented spine in May and September. Collected at night. Heleioporus eyrei Seven collected in May, 1 in October. Margins of saltlakes; loco 2.1 and 7.3 in May, loco 7.8 in September. Collected at night. Limnodynastes dorsalis Five collected in May, 1 in July, 2 in September. Margins of saltlakes and in shrubland; loco 2.1 and 7.3 in May, loco 7.2 in July, loco 2.2 and 3.14 in September. July specimen was under hollow log among samphires, others were collected at night. Neobatrachus centralis Ten collected in May from margins of saltlakes. Neobatrachus pelobatoides Nine collected in May and 2 in July from margins of saltlakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Revision of Hoggicosa Roewer, 1960, the Australian 'Bicolor' Group of Wolf Spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae)Zoj 545 83
    Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2010, 158, 83–123. With 25 figures Systematic revision of Hoggicosa Roewer, 1960, the Australian ‘bicolor’ group of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae)zoj_545 83..123 PETER R. LANGLANDS1* and VOLKER W. FRAMENAU1,2 1School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia 2Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked bag 49, Welshpool DC, WA, 6986, Australia Received 16 September 2008; accepted for publication 3 November 2008 The Australian wolf spider genus Hoggicosa Roewer, 1960 with the type species Hoggicosa errans (Hogg, 1905) is revised to include ten species: Hoggicosa alfi sp. nov.; Hoggicosa castanea (Hogg, 1905) comb. nov. (= Lycosa errans Hogg, 1905 syn. nov.; = Lycosa perinflata Pulleine, 1922 syn. nov.; = Lycosa skeeti Pulleine, 1922 syn. nov.); Hoggicosa bicolor (McKay, 1973) comb. nov.; Hoggicosa brennani sp. nov.; Hoggicosa duracki (McKay, 1975) comb. nov.; Hoggicosa forresti (McKay, 1973) comb. nov.; Hoggicosa natashae sp. nov.; Hoggicosa snelli (McKay, 1975) comb. nov.; Hoggicosa storri (McKay, 1973) comb. nov.; and Hoggicosa wolodymyri sp. nov. The Namibian Hoggicosa exigua Roewer, 1960 is transferred to Hogna, Hogna exigua (Roewer, 1960) comb. nov. A phylogenetic analysis including nine Hoggicosa species, 11 lycosine species from Australia and four from overseas, with Arctosa cinerea Fabricius, 1777 as outgroup, supported the monophyly of Hoggicosa, with a larger distance between the epigynum anterior pockets compared to the width of the posterior transverse part. The analysis found that an unusual sexual dimorphism for wolf spiders (females more colourful than males), evident in four species of Hoggicosa, has evolved multiple times. Hoggicosa are burrowing lycosids, several constructing doors from sand or debris, and are predominantly found in semi-arid to arid regions of Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Evolution of Endocrine
    THE EVOLUTION OF ENDOCRINE EXTRAEMBRYONIC MEMBRANES; A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STEROIDOGENESIS AND STEROID SIGNALING IN THE CHORIOALLANTOIC MEMBRANE OF OVIPAROUS AMNIOTES By LORI CRUZE ALBERGOTTI A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 1 © 2011 Lori Cruze Albergotti 2 Ken, I will be forever grateful for your love and support. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I would like to thank Lou Guillette for his generous financial, technical and emotional support. Lou has taught me that being a scientist is the opportunity to be a detective in pursuit of answers to an intriguing question, and this pursuit requires not only an analytical mind, but also a creative one. I thank Lou for giving me this opportunity and for his endless guidance and encouragement, and last but not least for his friendship. I could not have asked for a better graduate experience and I am convinced that this has everything to do with having Lou as an advisor and Bernie, Colette, Marty and Malcolm as committee members. I would like to thank Bernie for pushing me outside of my comfort zone, for encouraging me to think broadly about my research, and for his willingness to provide lab assistance. Thank you to Colette for lending statistical and experimental design expertise, for pushing me to think about the big picture of my research, and for always believing in me. I would like to thank Marty for expanding my understanding of evolution and development, for allowing me the amazing opportunity to teach with him, and for making his lab available to me.
    [Show full text]