Herpetofauna of the Southern Carnarvon Basin, Western Australia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Herpetofauna of the Southern Carnarvon Basin, Western Australia DOI: 10.18195/issn.0313-122x.61.2000.335-360 Records of the Western Australian Museum Supplement No. 61: 335-360 (2000). Herpetofauna of the southern Camarvon Basin, Western Australia 2 2 2 N.L. McKenziet, J.K. Rolfet, K.P. Aplin , M.A. Cowan and L.A. Smith 1 Department of Conservation and Land Management, p.a. Box 51, Wanneroo, Western Australia 6065, Australia 2 Western Australian Museum, Francis Street, Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia Abstract - We sampled the frog and reptile species on 63 quadrats chosen to represent the geographical extent and diversity of terrestrial environments in a 75 000 km2 study area in the Carnarvon Basin. Twelve frog and 17 gecko, 10 pygopodid, 16 dragon, 58 skink, four goanna and 16 snake species were recorded, an average of 16.3 species per quadrat. Patterns in species composition were related to biogeographical, ecological and local evolutionary processes. Four species assemblages were distinguished, each relating to gradients in a different set of precipitation plus soil plus topographic attributes. In these terms, Poisson error models with logarithmic links fitted the relationships. Virtually identical patterns emerged when we re-analysed the data using an ecological taxonomy that was based on functional morphology. If evolutionary processes are to be protected along with the ecological and biogeographical processes, the reserve system will need to sample the geographical range of the various rainfall, soil and topographic gradients identified by the analyses. INTRODUCTION patterns in the study area was carried out by This study explores patterns in the composition of Kendrick (1991), for his dissertation on the reptilian and amphibian communities in non- biogeography, ecology and systematic aquatic environments of the southern Carnarvon relationships of the skink genus Lerista. But the Basin. lack of any systematic ecological survey of the The earliest records from the study area were made entire herpetofauna in terms of the study area's early last century by naturalists Peron, Quoy and climatic and, geomorphological gradients has Gaimard accompanying the French navigators precluded any quantitative understanding of the Baudin and Freycinet (Storr and Harold, 1978). The structure and composition of this component of its German zoologists W. Michaelsen and R. Hartmeyer communities. made the next collections in 1905 (Werner, 1909). By sampling a set of quadrats, positioned to Most of the data available at the outset of this represent the diversity of the study area's physical study were derived from specimens collected in the environments across its geographical extent, we area since the 1950s and lodged in the collections of aimed to provide a regional context for conserving the Western Australian Museum. Sources included the study area's herpetofauna. Specifically, our the localised inventories of Bernier and Dorre Island objectives were to: (Douglas and Ride, 1962), Faure Island in 1959 • carry out the first systematic survey of species (W.H. Butler, unpublished), Dirk Hartog Island extant in the study area, (Burbidge and George, 1978), Edel Land and • lodge voucher collections in the Western Hamelin (see Storr and Harold, 1978), and Toolonga Australian Museum for detailed taxonomic Nature Reserve (Burbidge et al., 1980). appraisal (Aplin et al., in press), The first comprehensive inventories, carried out • provide an overview of the status and between 1976 and 1980 by Harold, Peterson and distribution of species, Winton, allowed Storr and Harold (1978, 1980, • describe the relationships between species 1984) to review the biogeographical relationships occurrences and attributes of the study area's and habitat-preferences of the amphibian and physical environment, and identify predictors of reptilian species known from the Zuytdorp, Shark gradients in species composition across the Bay and Lake MacLeod Regions. Combined, these study area and three regions cover the same tract of country as our • provide a quadrat-based benchmark against study area. which future changes in the status of the The first quantitative sampling of herpetofaunal herpetofauna can be measured. 336 N.L. McKenzie, J.K. Rolfe, K.P. Aplin, M.A. Cowan, L.A. Smith ~(~;> ... ~,;~,:r.... 113° 24° 24 Bernier 1 25° Donel Dirk Hartog 1 ~ N 27° 0 25 50 Kilometres 'J. ;; .-- t- ~ Cl ;: 114° c. 0 ...~. :> 0 )/, Figure 1 The Camarvon Basin study area, showing the 13 survey areas (campsites) and individual quadrat positions. Precise quadrat co-ordinates are provided in Appendix A (p. $$$, this volume). Survey area codes were Bush Bay (BB), Boolathana (BO), Cape Cuvier (CD), Edel Land (EL), Gascoyne Junction (GJ), Kennedy Range (KE), Meedo (MD), Mardathuna (MR), Nanga (NA), Nerren Nerren (NE), PelOn Peninsula (PE), Woodleigh (WO) and Zuytdorp (ZU). Herpetofauna 337 METHODS the coast southwards from Shark Bay is partially mantled by palE yellow to grey sands supporting Study Area low proteaceous heaths with r ~ thickets of The Carnarvon Basin study area covers 75 000 Banksia and mallees such as Eucalyptus illyarrie. km 2 on Australia's western coast. It is centred on White coastal sand dunes support Spinifex longifolius Shark Bay, and extends northwards from the communities. Low-lying saline areas, such as the Murchison River to the Minilya River, and fringes of Lake MacLeod and the coastal flats, eastwards to 115°30'E (beyond Gascoyne Junction) support samphire and saltbush communities. (Figure 1). Detailed descriptions of the vegetations in the study Its physical environments are detailed by Wyrwoll, area are provided by Beard (1975, 1976), Payne et al. Courtney and Sandercock (2000) and Wyrwoll, (1987), Gibson et al. (2000) and Keighery et al. (2000). Stoneman, Elliott and Sandercock (2000). Briefly, the region is alow land characterised by gentle gradients Historical Review on abasement of soft sediments. Under avariety of climates, interacting alluvial and aeolian processes Lists of the species previously captured in the study area were extracted from published literature have produced acomplex landscape mosaic, that has and from the Western Australian Museum's been further modified by extensive coastal transgressions associated with sea-level changes. zoological register. Today, the area south of Shark Bay has asemi-arid climate influenced by temperate weather systems Field Sampling (mainly winter rainfall). From Shark Bay northward, Herpetofauna were sampled on quadrats the climate is influenced by both tropical and positioned throughout the geographical extent of temperate systems; semi-arid at the coast, but arid the study area in astratified random array. The with locally unreliable summer and winter rainfall quadrats were placed in typical examples of each of further inland. In phytogeographic terms, the study the surface stratigraphic units that characterise the area comprises the northern half of the Irwin District study area. Many quadrats were pseudo-replicated of the South-western Province, as well as the (locally as well as at distant points) to allo'Y for the southern half of the Carnarvon District of the internal heterogeneity of the stratificatton units Eremean Province (Beard, 1980). (hypothesised scalars) and to. ~ any Extensive alluvial plains dominate the study area, analytical circularity introduced by the stratification although erosional uplands such as the Kennedy (McKenzie et al., 1989, 1991b). Range occur in its eastern parts. The plains are The study area encompassed seven million traversed from east to west by two large, ephemeral hectares, and sampling was restricted to 63 releve rivers: the Gascoyne and Wooramel. Both rivers are quadrats with acombined area of 1008 hectares lined with groves of River Gum (Eucalyptus victrix). (each releve was set in avisually homogeneous 400 Low open woodlands of bow gad a(Acacia linophylla) x400 m area =16 hectares; 63 x16 =1008 ha). Thus, and snakewood (A. xiphophylla) over Atriplex, Senna sampling was sparse; no more than 0.014% of study and Eremophila shrubs and tussock grasses cover the area was actually sampled. The 63 quadrats were plains, with Acacia grasbyi in areas where calcretes clustered in sets of two to six quadrats around each are exposed. Low red sand ridges scattered across of 13 survey areas, herein referred to as 'campsites'. the plains support shrubs over mainly hummock- Trapping and hand-foraging (digging, raking etc) grasses. In northern parts, the plains grade into red were used to detect species' presence-absence on sand dune fields that support hummock-grass and quadrats. Two pitfall-trap arrays were placed on mulga (A. aneura) communities reminiscent of the each quadrat. The arrays each comprised aline of 6 red centre. In the south the plains support PVC tubular pitfall-traps ('tubes'), 125 mm in woodlands of Eucalyptus loxophleba and Callitris diameter and 500 mm deep, spaced at 10 m glaucophylla, with mallee, Banksia, Allocasuarina and intervals along a50 m flywire drift fence that was Actinostrobus scrubs and heaths on greyish and 300 mm high. About 5 m from either side of the 50 yellow sand dunes. Astrip of limestone that follows m fence was a"bucket" pitfall-trap 300 mm in Table 1 Total number of fenced pitfall-trap nights per sampling session, excluding the 9260 tub-nights in May 1995. Pit-trap Type Oct94 Jan 95 May 95 Nov 95" Mar96 b Total Buckets 1220 12 1244 2476 Tubes 3660 72 3704 516 2736 10 688 Total 4880 84 4948 516 2736 13164 "see 'Data quality', below. bsee Table 2. 338 N.L. McKenzie, J.K. RoUe, K.P. Aplin,
Recommended publications
  • Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report
    Geography Monograph Series No. 13 Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. Brisbane, 2009 The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. is a non-profit organization that promotes the study of Geography within educational, scientific, professional, commercial and broader general communities. Since its establishment in 1885, the Society has taken the lead in geo- graphical education, exploration and research in Queensland. Published by: The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. 237 Milton Road, Milton QLD 4064, Australia Phone: (07) 3368 2066; Fax: (07) 33671011 Email: [email protected] Website: www.rgsq.org.au ISBN 978 0 949286 16 8 ISSN 1037 7158 © 2009 Desktop Publishing: Kevin Long, Page People Pty Ltd (www.pagepeople.com.au) Printing: Snap Printing Milton (www.milton.snapprinting.com.au) Cover: Pemberton Design (www.pembertondesign.com.au) Cover photo: Cravens Peak. Photographer: Nick Rains 2007 State map and Topographic Map provided by: Richard MacNeill, Spatial Information Coordinator, Bush Heritage Australia (www.bushheritage.org.au) Other Titles in the Geography Monograph Series: No 1. Technology Education and Geography in Australia Higher Education No 2. Geography in Society: a Case for Geography in Australian Society No 3. Cape York Peninsula Scientific Study Report No 4. Musselbrook Reserve Scientific Study Report No 5. A Continent for a Nation; and, Dividing Societies No 6. Herald Cays Scientific Study Report No 7. Braving the Bull of Heaven; and, Societal Benefits from Seasonal Climate Forecasting No 8. Antarctica: a Conducted Tour from Ancient to Modern; and, Undara: the Longest Known Young Lava Flow No 9. White Mountains Scientific Study Report No 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Level 1 Fauna Survey of the Gruyere Gold Project Borefields (Harewood 2016)
    GOLD ROAD RESOURCES LIMITED GRUYERE PROJECT EPA REFERRAL SUPPORTING DOCUMENT APPENDIX 5: LEVEL 1 FAUNA SURVEY OF THE GRUYERE GOLD PROJECT BOREFIELDS (HAREWOOD 2016) Gruyere EPA Ref Support Doc Final Rev 1.docx Fauna Assessment (Level 1) Gruyere Borefield Project Gold Road Resources Limited January 2016 Version 3 On behalf of: Gold Road Resources Limited C/- Botanica Consulting PO Box 2027 BOULDER WA 6432 T: 08 9093 0024 F: 08 9093 1381 Prepared by: Greg Harewood Zoologist PO Box 755 BUNBURY WA 6231 M: 0402 141 197 T/F: (08) 9725 0982 E: [email protected] GRUYERE BOREFIELD PROJECT –– GOLD ROAD RESOURCES LTD – FAUNA ASSESSMENT (L1) – JAN 2016 – V3 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................1 2. SCOPE OF WORKS ...............................................................................................1 3. RELEVANT LEGISTALATION ................................................................................2 4. METHODS...............................................................................................................3 4.1 POTENTIAL VETEBRATE FAUNA INVENTORY - DESKTOP SURVEY ............. 3 4.1.1 Database Searches.......................................................................................3 4.1.2 Previous Fauna Surveys in the Area ............................................................3 4.1.3 Existing Publications .....................................................................................5 4.1.4 Fauna
    [Show full text]
  • A LIST of the VERTEBRATES of SOUTH AUSTRALIA
    A LIST of the VERTEBRATES of SOUTH AUSTRALIA updates. for Edition 4th Editors See A.C. Robinson K.D. Casperson Biological Survey and Research Heritage and Biodiversity Division Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia M.N. Hutchinson South Australian Museum Department of Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts, South Australia 2000 i EDITORS A.C. Robinson & K.D. Casperson, Biological Survey and Research, Biological Survey and Research, Heritage and Biodiversity Division, Department for Environment and Heritage. G.P.O. Box 1047, Adelaide, SA, 5001 M.N. Hutchinson, Curator of Reptiles and Amphibians South Australian Museum, Department of Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts. GPO Box 234, Adelaide, SA 5001updates. for CARTOGRAPHY AND DESIGN Biological Survey & Research, Heritage and Biodiversity Division, Department for Environment and Heritage Edition Department for Environment and Heritage 2000 4thISBN 0 7308 5890 1 First Edition (edited by H.J. Aslin) published 1985 Second Edition (edited by C.H.S. Watts) published 1990 Third Edition (edited bySee A.C. Robinson, M.N. Hutchinson, and K.D. Casperson) published 2000 Cover Photograph: Clockwise:- Western Pygmy Possum, Cercartetus concinnus (Photo A. Robinson), Smooth Knob-tailed Gecko, Nephrurus levis (Photo A. Robinson), Painted Frog, Neobatrachus pictus (Photo A. Robinson), Desert Goby, Chlamydogobius eremius (Photo N. Armstrong),Osprey, Pandion haliaetus (Photo A. Robinson) ii _______________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Summary: Rangelands, Western Australia
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Guide to Users Background What is the summary for and where does it come from? This summary has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. It highlights important elements of the biodiversity of the region in two ways: • Listing species which may be significant for management because they are found only in the region, mainly in the region, or they have a conservation status such as endangered or vulnerable. • Comparing the region to other parts of Australia in terms of the composition and distribution of its species, to suggest components of its biodiversity which may be nationally significant. The summary was produced using the Australian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. The list of families covered in ANHAT is shown in Appendix 1. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are are not not included included in the in the summary. • The data used for this summary come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect.
    [Show full text]
  • Lorna Glen (Matuwa) Small Vertebrate Fauna Monitoring Program 2002-2010 – Preliminary Analysis and Review
    Lorna Glen (Matuwa) small vertebrate fauna monitoring program 2002-2010 – preliminary analysis and review Tamra F. Chapman and Neil Burrows 2015 Contributions and acknowledgments Mark Cowan designed the trapping program and conducted the monitoring program from 2002 to 2008. Karl Brennan supervised the monitoring program in 2009 and 2010. Tamra Chapman analysed the data and prepared the report with statistical advice from Matthew Williams. Mark Cowan produced Figure 8 and Figure 9 and Neil Burrows prepared the new monitoring plan based on the outcomes of a workshop attended by Tamra Chapman, Lesley Gibson, Ian Kealley, Keith Morris and Colin Yates. The Department wishes to thank the many Parks and Wildlife officers and volunteers who participated in the trapping program. Cover photograph by Judy Dunlop. Table of Contents 1 Background and trends ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Methods .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Results ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.4 Discussion ........................................................................................................................ 15 2 Responses to environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Species Richness in Time and Space: a Phylogenetic and Geographic Perspective
    Species Richness in Time and Space: a Phylogenetic and Geographic Perspective by Pascal Olivier Title A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) in The University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Assistant Professor and Assistant Curator Daniel Rabosky, Chair Associate Professor Johannes Foufopoulos Professor L. Lacey Knowles Assistant Professor Stephen A. Smith Pascal O Title [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6316-0736 c Pascal O Title 2018 DEDICATION To Judge Julius Title, for always encouraging me to be inquisitive. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research presented in this dissertation has been supported by a number of research grants from the University of Michigan and from academic societies. I thank the Society of Systematic Biologists, the Society for the Study of Evolution, and the Herpetologists League for supporting my work. I am also extremely grateful to the Rackham Graduate School, the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology C.F. Walker and Hinsdale scholarships, as well as to the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Block grants, for generously providing support throughout my PhD. Much of this research was also made possible by a Rackham Predoctoral Fellowship, and by a fellowship from the Michigan Institute for Computational Discovery and Engineering. First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Dan Rabosky, for taking me on as one of his first graduate students. I have learned a tremendous amount under his guidance, and conducting research with him has been both exhilarating and inspiring. I am also grateful for his friendship and company, both in Ann Arbor and especially in the field, which have produced experiences that I will never forget.
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna Assessment
    Fauna Assessment Medcalf Vanadium Mining Project Proposed Haul Road Audalia Resources Limited November 2017 Version 2 On behalf of: Audalia Resources Ltd c/- Botanica Consulting PO Box 2027 BOULDER WA 6432 T: 08 9093 0024 F: 08 9093 1381 Prepared by: Greg Harewood Zoologist PO Box 755 BUNBURY WA 6231 M: 0402 141 197 E: [email protected] MEDCALF VANADIUM MINING PROJECT - PROPOSED HAUL ROAD – AUDALIA RESOURCES LIMITED FAUNA ASSESSMENT – NOVEMBER 2017 – V2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 1 2. SCOPE OF WORKS .................................................................................. 1 3. METHODS ................................................................................................. 1 3.1 SITE SURVEYS ......................................................................................... 1 3.1.1 General Fauna Habitat Assessment ................................................ 1 3.1.2 Fauna Observations......................................................................... 2 3.2 POTENTIAL VERTEBRATE FAUNA INVENTORY ................................... 2 3.2.1 Database Searches ......................................................................... 2 3.2.2 Previous Fauna Surveys in the Area ............................................... 3 3.2.3 Existing Publications ........................................................................ 4 3.2.4 Fauna of Conservation Significance ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Biological Survey of the Eyre Peninsula South Australia
    A BIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE EYRE PENINSULA SOUTH AUSTRALIA R Brandle Science Resource Centre Information, Science and Technology Directorate Department for Environment and Heritage South Australia 2010 Eyre Peninsula Biological Survey The Biological Survey of the Eyre Peninsula was an initiative of the Biological Survey and Monitoring Section for the South Australian Department for Environment and Heritage The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the State Government of South Australia. The report may be cited as: Brandle, R. (2010). A Biological Survey of the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia. (Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia). Limited hard copies of the report were prepared, but it can also be accessed from the Internet on: http://www.environment.sa.gov.au/biodiversity/biosurveys EDITOR R. Brandle – Science Resource Centre, Information Science & Technology, Department for Environment and Heritage. PO Box 1047 Adelaide 5001 AUTHORS R. Brandle, P. Lang, P. Canty, D. Armstrong – Science Resource Centre, Information Science & Technology, Department for Environment and Heritage. PO Box 1047 Adelaide 5001 G. Carpenter – Native Vegetation & Biodiversity Management Unit, Department of Water, Land & Biodiversity, GPO Box 2834. J. Cooper - PO Box 128, Port Lincoln SA. © Department for Environment and Heritage 2010 ISBN: 978-1-921466-42-7 Cover Photograph: A southern Eyre Peninsula view north from the Marble Range to South Block range. Photo: R Brandle ii Eyre Peninsula Biological Survey Abstract Specific objectives of the Biological Survey of the Eyre Peninsula Biogeographic Region were to collate the existing flora and fauna information and systematically sample the diversity of habitats present in the region for vertebrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Rehabilitation Index for Evaluating Restoration of Terrestrial Ecosystems Using the Reptile Assemblage As the Bio-Indicator
    Author's personal copy ecological indicators 8 (2008) 530–549 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolind Rehabilitation index for evaluating restoration of terrestrial ecosystems using the reptile assemblage as the bio-indicator Scott A. Thompson a, Graham G. Thompson b,*, Philip C. Withers c a Coffey Environments, Dilhorn House, 2 Bulwer Street, Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia b Centre for Ecosystem Management, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, Western Australia 6027, Australia c Zoology, School of Animal Biology, M092, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia article info abstract Article history: We developed an index to quantify rehabilitation success for terrestrial environments using Received 4 September 2006 data on reptile assemblages from five rehabilitated mine site waste dumps and adjacent Received in revised form undisturbed areas. It is based on the multi-metric principles of the index of biotic integrity 23 June 2007 (IBI). This rehabilitation and degradation index (RDI) is a quantitative measure of the extent Accepted 1 July 2007 to which the reptile assemblage in a rehabilitated site resembles that in an analogue site. It utilises a combination of diversity, assemblage composition and ecological parameters. Each of these parameters is further sub-divided and an overall weighted score out of 100 can Keywords: be calculated for a disturbed area. This index can also be used to quantify the impact of Reptiles grazing, feral predators or noise and dust on functional terrestrial ecosystems. Data from Restoration the Western Australian goldfields are used to explain the calculations necessary to achieve Rehabilitation an RDI score.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Survey Anangu Pitjantjatjara Lands
    VEGETATION MAPPING By S. J. Pillman1, P. D. Canty1, A. C. Robinson1, and P. J. Lang1 INTRODUCTION plains, Eucalyptus microtheca [= coolabah] Low Only very generalised vegetation mapping was Woodland on floodplains, Eucalyptus gamophylla +/ available for the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Lands (AP E. oxymitra Open Scrub on dunes and Atriplex Lands) prior to this survey. rhagodioides [= nummularia] Low Shrubland on plains. Specht (1972) mapped four general communities: EPHEMERAL COMMUNITIES, Far North-west In his update of the work of Davies, Neagle (1995) Ranges, TALL SHRUBLAND, Acacia aneura- A. added data on additions to the National Parks and brachystachya, HUMMOCK GRASSLAND to LOW Wildlife Conservation Reserves system and on the OPEN WOODLAND Triodia basedowii (+/ many Heritage Agreement Areas proclaimed since Casuarina [= Allocasuarina] decaisneana in north, Davies’ work, but this had no effect in the AP Lands in LOW SHRUBLAND, Atriplex rhagodioides [= terms of re-defining the threatened vegetation nummularia] and LOW SHRUBLAND Atriplex communities. vesicaria- Bassia [Sclerolaena] sp. Broad-scale vegetation mapping has also been A map produced by the Pastoral Board (1973) showed completed in those areas of Western Australia and the four general communities: MALLEE - NATIVE PINE Northern Territory, which adjoin the AP Lands. - NATIVE FIG – CORKWOOD – BLOODWOOD SPINIFEX ASSOCIATION on the ranges, DESERT In Western Australia, Beard and Webb (1974) OAK - DESERT KURRAJONG – MULGA described the techniques used in the 1:250 000 SPINIFEX ASSOCIATION and a MULGA – vegetation mapping to develop the 1:1 000 000 CORKWOOD - BLOODWOOD- IRONWOOD vegetation map series for Western Australia. The ASSOCIATION on the surrounding plains. second of these published maps covered the Great Victoria Desert (Beard 1974) and included the area The map by Boomsma and Lewis (1980) incorporating adjacent to the AP Lands in Western Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix N: Biodiversity - Fauna and Threatened Species Report
    Arafura Resouces Ltd Nolans Environmental Impact Statement volume three N Biodiversity – Fauna and Threatened Species Report Appendix N Arafura Resources Limited Nolans Project Environmental Impact Statement Appendix N: Biodiversity - Fauna and Threatened Species Report May 2016 Executive summary Introduction GHD was engaged by Arafura Resources Ltd to undertake a range of biodiversity assessments of the Nolans Rare Earths Study area. This report presents information pertaining to fauna within and surrounding the Study area. The main objective of this report is to address the biodiversity assessment requirements (fauna component) of the Terms of Reference set by the Northern Territory Environment Protection Authority (NT EPA) for assessment of the Nolans Rare Earths Project. These Terms of Reference take into account formal assessment and approval under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act 1999, by way of the NT/Commonwealth bilateral environmental assessment process. This report describes the methods used and results obtained from desktop and field surveys spanning two main periods: late 2010 and early 2011, and mid-2015. The assessed area included the proposed mine site, processing site, accommodation facility, access roads, haul route, utilities corridor (potable water pipeline, water supply pipeline, power line corridor) and borefield area. The assessed area in 2010/11 also included a proposed haul route that has since been removed from the area of investigation. However, results from surveys in that area are discussed where relevant, because that area contained habitats that are similar to those in the current footprint. During the course of the assessments for this project, the Commonwealth Department of the Environment made changes to the threatened species lists considered under the EPBC Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Interactions with Threatened, Endangered Or Protected Species in South Australian Managed Fisheries Data Summary: 2007/08 – 2013/14
    McLeay, L. et al. (2015) Wildlife Interactions in SA Managed Fisheries – 2013/14 Operational Interactions with Threatened, Endangered or Protected Species in South Australian Managed Fisheries Data Summary: 2007/08 – 2013/14 L. McLeay, A. Tsolos and M. K. Boyle SARDI Publication No. F2009/000544-5 SARDI Research Report Series No. 851 SARDI Aquatic Sciences PO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 July 2015 Report to PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture ii McLeay, L. et al. (2015) Wildlife Interactions in SA Managed Fisheries – 2013/14 Operational Interactions with Threatened, Endangered or Protected Species in South Australian Managed Fisheries Data Summary: 2007/08 – 2013/14 Report to PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture L. J. McLeay, A. Tsolos and M. K. Boyle SARDI Publication No. F2009/000544-5 SARDI Research Report Series No. 851 July 2015 iii McLeay, L. et al. (2015) Wildlife Interactions in SA Managed Fisheries – 2013/14 This publication may be cited as: McLeay, L. J., Tsolos, A. and Boyle, M. K. (2015). Operational Interactions with Threatened, Endangered or Protected Species in South Australian Managed Fisheries. Data Summary: 2007/08 – 2013/14. Report to PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2009/000544-5. SARDI Research Report Series No. 851. 78pp. Cover Photos: Australian Sea Lions and Long-nosed Fur Seal pup (courtesy of Crystal Beckmann). Little Penguin (courtesy of B. Page). Leafy Seadragon (courtesy of S. Sorokin). Great White Shark (courtesy of R. Saunders). South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.pir.sa.gov.au/ DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report.
    [Show full text]