Better Streets Delivered 2 Better This Document Is a Research Document and Its Content Does Not Represent Adopted Policy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Better Streets Delivered 2 Better This Document Is a Research Document and Its Content Does Not Represent Adopted Policy Better 2 Delivered Streets This document is a research document and its content does not represent adopted policy. All errors and omissions remain our own. Better Streets Delivered 2 Learning from completed schemes Learning from completed schemes from completed Learning © Transport for London Windsor House 42-50 Victoria Street London SW1H 0TL April 2017 tfl.gov.uk TR1510933_Better Streets_2017_Spine_AW.indd 1 07/04/2017 09:57 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION We are transforming the way we manage and understand our streets. However, Better Streets Delivered Learning from completed schemes Better 10 36 population estimates indicate that London needs to absorb approximately Streets Delivered 03 Introduction STREETS JUNCTIONS AND LINKS 1.5 million more people by 2031. A population infl ux of this magnitude puts Learning from completed schemes 04 Benefi ts of Healthy Streets 12 Hoe Street, Walthamstow Town 38 Euston Circus increasing pressure on our streets, requiring them to perform more effi ciently to 04 Better Streets initiative Centre 42 Holborn Circus transport additional goods and people within limited space. In this context we are 06 Categorising the schemes 14 Leyton High Road 44 Leonard Circus already changing the way we are thinking about our streets. 08 Better Streets Delivered 16 Royal College Street A growing body of evidence shows the important role that streets play in our daily 18 Victoria Road and The Battis, lives. Well-designed streets help to improve the local economy, encourage people MAYOR Romford Transport for London OF LONDON 01 20 Wood Street Town Centre 46 to use more healthy modes of transport, and foster social connections. With such TOWN CENTRES a range of infl uences, and with streets making up the majority of London’s public 48 Bexleyheath Town Centre spaces, the importance of ensuring good urban design cannot be overstated. 22 50 Bromley Village North As these impacts have become better understood in recent years, our focus on 52 Clapham Junction PUBLIC SPACES designing more appealing streets has increased. The Mayor and TfL have now 54 Clapham Old Town 24 Bonnington Square adopted the Healthy Streets Approach, which aims to create streets where people 58 Harlesden Town Centre 26 Gillett Square from all walks of life choose to walk, cycle and use public transport, for the good 60 Hornchurch Town Centre 28 Van Gogh Walk of their own health and the success of the city as a whole. Reducing the dominance 62 Southall Broadway Boulevard 30 Vauxhall Walk Rain Gardens of motor vehicles and creating streets that work for people will now be at the heart 64 Sydenham Town Centre of everything we do. 66 Wood Green High Road Across the Capital creative and innovative solutions are being implemented in 32 design and technology to make the most out of our streets and spaces. New street INTERCHANGES 68 layouts, new materials and new technology are being trialled to help improve 34 Sutton Station Gateway journeys and the day-to-day lives of Londoners. THE FUTURE 70 Aldgate Gyratory This document is the second in a series celebrating the achievements that are 72 Ealing Broadway Interchange contributing to making our vision for London’s streets a reality. In it we set out 74 Shepherds Bush Town Centre West examples of the great work that has already been done and work that is up and coming. In the fi rst document we looked particularly at some of the Capital’s 76 Street Types for London most high-profi le regeneration schemes. However in this edition we have been able to review a wider variety of schemes. While all of the schemes have been transformational, some of them use a light touch approach while others have completely redesigned the street. Our streets and spaces will continue to evolve to accommodate the growing and changing pressures on our city. At the heart of these changes are London’s people for whom we continuously strive to provide a better quality of life. Streets play a fundamental role in all of our lives, and understanding and carefully balancing the diverse needs of everyone who uses our streets will create better space and places for people to live, work and more. 03 BETTER STREETS DELIVERED One of the biggest health benefits that good quality calculation. For more information Valuing the health Better Streets staged approach public realm can deliver is enabling people to benefits of transport schemes: Guidance for London Tidy up Remove unnecessary road increase their everyday physical activity through an is available at TfL.gov.uk markings or broken street environment which is pleasant and safe to visit, walk furniture which is simple to and cycle in. Physical activity helps to improve health HEALTH BENEFITS PER YEAR remove and in doing so, will by reducing risk of heart disease, cancer and type 2 not damage the footway. diabetes as well as helping people to manage stress, £265,000 De-clutter A more strategic justification maintain a healthy weight and sleep better. £109,000 for every individual piece of equipment in the street; with the How to use the HEAT tool presumption of removal unless a clear reason for retention is given. The tool can be applied to any scheme which expects Better Streets initiative an uplift of cycling and/or walking, from a surface Relocate or Any remaining features should The Better Streets initiative has been a driving force in infrastructure redesign to masterplan regeneration merge be rationalised by combining creating reinvigorated neighbourhoods across London. strategies. To use the tool, you simply need an functions signage and lighting or relocating It has brought to the fore a stark reality: that the estimate of the walking and cycling count before a street furniture to better fulfil its quality of the urban environment has lasting and far- intended use. scheme is implemented and the walking and cycling reaching effects on our communities and daily lives. Source: Lucy Saunders levels after completion. This can be obtained from Rethink traffic This could include considering user priority, changes to counts of pedestrians and cyclists. The results from management Figure 1: Indicators of a healthy street environment This document is the second in a set, dedicated options carriageway widths or the HEAT can also be used to help support business to investigating and celebrating the achievements removal of traffic signals. cases by demonstrating the value for money a of public realm schemes. Each scheme featured Recreate the Complete remodelling of the Benefits of Healthy Streets scheme can provide. reinforces the primary lesson of the Better Streets street street, such as creating a shared We are playing a major role in improving health in initiative: that context must dictate response. surface, may be suitable if a new To use the HEAT tool please go to: London, by investing to make the Capital’s streets Successful streets can only be achieved by set of objectives or character http://www.heatwalkingcycling.org/ is desired. This approach is not more inviting, safer, greener and inclusive of all types understanding and responding to the unique function, suitable in all locations and of journeys. One of the ways we are measuring the performance and form of a street or area. The Using HEAT in Better Streets Delivered requires extensive consultation. impact of investment is with the Health Economic examples included demonstrate the exceptional Assessment Tool (HEAT) for walking and cycling. This This document presents HEAT values which were quality that can be achieved by taking this approach For each scheme in the document a simple diagram tool was developed by the World Health Organisation calculated using counts of pedestrians and cyclists and share key lessons from each project, hoping to is included to highlight the measures used during (WHO) to help organisations monetise the health taken on-street. Very conservative estimates were inspire future excellence across London. development. Coloured lines and boxes indicate benefits of reduced mortality gained by increases in applied so the outputs reflect a minimum estimated methods that were used, while grey text and white walking and cycling. value. Most of the projects included in this report did The measures shown in the table (top right) show boxes show those that were not used. not have both baseline and ‘after’ data on pedestrians increasing complexity and cost. They are the main The Healthy Streets Approach we have now adopted and cyclists. For these projects it was assumed that actions that people and organisations can use to Better Streets level of intervention there was a 15% uplift, this is a conservative estimate puts health at the heart of our decision making, and achieve better streets. Recreate the street better monitoring and use of the HEAT tool on all based on observed uplift in other similar projects. Rethink traffic management schemes will be an important part of ensuring that Where the uplift was observed using baseline Relocate/merge functions we invest in the right schemes, in the right way. and ‘after’ counts this was applied in the HEAT De-clutter Tidy up 04 05 BETTER STREETS DELIVERED Categorising the schemes Certain projects may contain more than one The examples in both publications show the broad intervention type, often because of the need to diversity of the Better Streets projects achieved as tackle several complex issues. Where this is the case part of London’s Great Outdoors initiative. All were the project has been categorised according to what implemented using the aforementioned staged most makes the scheme exemplary, highlighting approach, so that each received the right intervention the notable, innovative methods used in design, for their context. Most of the schemes featured consultation and delivery. underwent marked changes beyond the lower end of the intervention scale, receiving more than a ‘tidy up’ or ‘de-clutter’.
Recommended publications
  • Area Plan Proposal for London Has Been Developed and in This Booklet You Will Find Information on the Changes Proposed for London
    Post Office Ltd Network Change Programme Area Plan Proposal London 2 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Proposed Local Area Plan 3. The Role of Postwatch 4. List of Post Office® branches proposed for closure 5. List of Post Office® branches proposed to remain in the Network • Frequently Asked Questions Leaflet • Map of the Local Area Plan • Branch Access Reports - information on proposed closing branches and details of alternative branches in the Area 3 4 1. Introduction The Government has recognised that fewer people are using Post Office® branches, partly because traditional services, including benefit payments and other services are now available in other ways, such as online or directly through banks. It has concluded that the overall size and shape of the network of Post Office® branches (“the Network”) needs to change. In May 2007, following a national public consultation, the Government announced a range of proposed measures to modernise and reshape the Network and put it on a more stable footing for the future. A copy of the Government’s response to the national public consultation (“the Response Document”) can be obtained at www.dti.gov.uk/consultations/page36024.html. Post Office Ltd has now put in place a Network Change Programme (“the Programme”) to implement the measures proposed by the Government. The Programme will involve the compulsory compensated closure of up to 2,500 Post Office® branches (out of a current Network of 14,300 branches), with the introduction of about 500 service points known as “Outreaches” to mitigate the impact of the proposed closures. Compensation will be paid to those subpostmasters whose branches are compulsorily closed under the Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Vebraalto.Com
    Amethyst Road, London Asking Price £500,000 Freehold 3 Bed House - Mid Terrace Features • Three Bedroom Freehold House • Two Reception Rooms • Large Cellar • Private Rear Garden • Chain Free • A Short Walk to Leyton Station • Potential to extend STP A characterful and brick-fronted three bedroom Victorian terrace with rear garden and sizeable cellar in Stratford, ideally located for transport links, the ever-evolving amenities of East Village and the superb Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park and Wanstead flats. The former athletes' village, now known as East Village, is just a half mile on foot, for a huge range of independent wining and dining establishments and all manner of other facilities and businesses, from a choice of gyms to nurseries and yoga centres. A WORD FROM THE OWNER... "It’s been a pleasure to live on friendly Amethyst Road for over a decade. The road is quiet and parking has never been a problem, which is surprising as it's close to the lively Stratford City, offering a theatre, cinemas and a wealth of shopping. Travel links are a big plus of our location. Leyton Station was our go-to station for heading into central London, and Stratford Station, with its abundance of travel options, was really handy - we enjoyed taking the Jubilee Line down to London Docklands, or further south to historic Greenwich. The International Rail Station transported us to Kings Cross in just 14 mins - perfect to speed up our journeys to work and for travels to Europe. We would spend weekends relaxing in Victoria Park, enjoying local pubs and restaurants.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex F –List of Consultees
    ANNEX F –LIST OF CONSULTEES Local highway authorities Leicester City Council Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Leicestershire County Council Bath & NE Somerset Council Lincolnshire County Council Bedfordshire County Council Liverpool City Council Birmingham City Council Local Government Association Blackburn & Darwen London Borough of Barking & Dagenham Blackpool Borough Council London Borough of Barnet Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Bexley Borough of Poole London Borough of Brent Bournemouth Borough Council London Borough of Bromley Bracknell Forest Borough Council London Borough of Camden Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Croydon Brighton and Hove City Council London Borough of Ealing Bristol City Council London Borough of Enfield Buckinghamshire County Council London Borough of Greenwich Bury Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hackney Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hammersmith and Cambridgeshire County Council Fulham Cheshire County Council London Borough of Haringey City of York Council London Borough of Harrow Cornwall County Council London Borough of Havering Corporation of London London Borough of Hillingdon County of Herefordshire District Council London Borough of Hounslow Coventry City Council London Borough of Islington Cumbria County Council London Borough of Lambeth Cumbria Highways London Borough of Lewisham Darlington Borough Council London Borough of Merton Derby City Council London Borough of Newham Derbyshire County Council London
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Intergenerational Housing
    Rethinking intergenerational housing This summary has been published following a year-long grant-funded research project to rethink intergenerational housing. Our goal has been to explore whether and how people of all ages and backgrounds can live independent lives in housing that supports the sharing of skills, knowledge and experience. These following pages outline our findings; if you want to find out more, please get in touch. An project by with Index An project by with People are increasingly living isolated lives; a key way to tackle this is to build housing that brings together social benefit, design and management. Housing in the UK is highly segregated, inflexible and often unsuitable, creating 1. Social benefit emerging crises in special needs and care, affordability and loneliness. These have major impacts on people’s health, increasing costs for society. The term intergenerational housing has been widely used to describe schemes that bring together younger and older people to share activities and to socialise. They have been found to deliver great benefits through ousin tackling isolation, but tend to be ad-hoc and encounter practical difficulties. Our aim has been to learn from these examples and to rethink how they could work as part of a strategic option for mainstream housing. 2. Dsin 3. Management The key to this is to consider social benefit, design and management together at the outset. This research was made possible by Innovate UK and a range of partnering housing and policy organisations. An project by with Research map Policy constraints opportunities This map shows the areas covered by our research project.
    [Show full text]
  • Overcrowding Data 2009-10 - Quarter 4 & Baseline Return
    London Assembly Planning and Housing Committee Combined Evidence Received:.pdf version Investigation: Overcrowding in London’s Social Rented Housing Contents Organisation Evidence Reference Page Number Number London Borough of Bromley OSRH001 2 Family Mosaic OSRH002 44 East Thames Group OSRH003 46 Affinity Sutton OSRH004 50 Homes and Communities Agency (London) OSRH005 54 South-East London Region OSRH006 60 Hexagon Housing Association OSRH007 62 London Borough of Redbridge OSRH008 66 Kier Partnership Homes OSRH009 87 Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) OSRH010 95 London Borough of Richmond upon Thames OSRH011 99 Citizens Advice OSRH012 103 Notting Hill Housing OSRH013 107 National Housing Federation OSRH014 110 London Borough of Waltham Forest OSRH015 114 Peabody Trust OSRH016 147 London Borough of Croydon OSRH017 153 London Borough of Camden OSRH018 156 G15 Group OSRH019 165 North London Sub Regional Partnership OSRH020 167 City of London OSRH021 172 Genesis Group OSRH022 174 London Borough of Barking and Dagenham OSRH023 179 St George Regeneration OSRH024 188 The Hyde Group OSRH025 190 London Borough of Hounslow OSRH026 194 London Borough of Harrow OSRH027 201 East London Sub Regional Partnership OSRH028 208 London School of Economics (LSE) OSRH029 215 Developers Group OSRH030 218 Amicus Horizon OSRH031 222 CIH (Chartered Institute of Housing) London OSRH032 225 London Borough of Southwark OSRH033 232 West London Region OSRH034 283 London Councils OSRH035 286 London Borough of Merton OSRH036 291 London Borough of Brent OSRH037
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX B the North West London Joint Health Overview & Scrutiny
    APPENDIX B The North West London Joint Health Overview & Scrutiny Committee Terms of Reference 1. Membership Membership of the Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee (JHOSC) is one nominated voting member from each participating council, plus one other nominated member to whom the vote can be transferred (on the basis of that member being an elected member of the council they are representing). Alternatively, a Borough can nominate one voting member only. A substitute member can be nominated by the Borough. The vote can also be transferred to the substitute member where he or she is an elected member of the council and the voting member is unavailable. The JHOSC consists of the following authorities: London Borough of Brent London Borough of Ealing London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham London Borough of Harrow London Borough of Hounslow Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea London Borough of Richmond City of Westminster 2. Quorum The committee will require at least six members in attendance to be quorate. 3. Chair and Vice Chair The JHOSC will elect its own chair and vice chair. Elections will take place on an annual basis each May, or as soon as practical thereafter, such as to allow for any annual changes to the committee’s membership. The Chair and Vice Chair shall not be members of the same authority or the same political party. 4. Duration It is important the JHOSC operates on the basis of being able to contribute to the effective scrutiny of cross-borough health issues. The JHOSC should provide a forum for cross borough engagement and consultation between its member local authorities, and health service commissioners and providers.
    [Show full text]
  • Harrow Industrial Stories the Local Economy on the Central Industrial Estates of the London Borough of Harrow Harrow Industrial Stories
    markoandplacemakers designconsultancyforlivablecities Harrow Industrial Stories The local economy on the central industrial estates of the London Borough of Harrow Harrow Industrial Stories Study and report by markoandplacemakers designconsultancyforlivablecities www.markoandplacemakers.com Copyright © Marko and Placemakers and Francis Moss August 2013 Commissioned by Harrow Council Supported by the Mayor’s Outer London Fund Marko and Placemakers Team Francis Moss, Igor Marko, Alejandro Sajgalik, Giulia Toscani, Denizer Ibrahim, Minh Toan Research The data and business profiles in this report are based on observation and information given by individual employees or owners of businesses during visits to Harrow’s central industrial estates in 2013. They are not official statements or data about the businesses. Photographs © Francis Moss Photographs were taken with the permission of the subjects to be included in this report and a potential exhibition. Kodak Archive Photographs © The British Library Board Bird’s-eye photographs © Microsoft Corporation Maps based on Ordnance Survey © Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100019206 Thanks to London Borough of Harrow Mark Billington, Andy Stubbs, David Sklair Greater London Authority Matt Murphy, Tina Jadav, Adam Towle, Mark Brearley Report best viewed as double page spread and printed double sided 2 Harrow Industrial Stories Contents Introduction 4 Context 5 Methodology 7 Categories 8 Overview 10 Estate breakdown 12 Location 14 Suppliers and Customers 15 Employees 16 Size 18 Age 20 Health 21 Estates A1-A4 22 Estates A1-A4 Profiles 24 Estate B1 26 Estate B1 Profiles 28 Estate B2 30 Estate B2 Profile 32 Estates C1-C6 34 Estates C1-C6 Profiles 36 Estates D1-D3 40 Estates D1-D3 Profiles 42 Estates E1-F1 44 Estates E1-F1 Profiles 46 Estates F2-F5 52 Estates F2-F5 Profiles 54 Estate G1 56 Estate G1 Profiles 58 Conclusion 60 Recommendations 62 Business Support 63 3 Harrow Industrial Stories Introduction London’s high streets have been the focus of a lot of recent attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Information To
    BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. About EACH 1.1 Organisational Profile EACH is a voluntary sector organisation with over 26 years’ experience of providing specialist counselling and support services to individuals and family members affected by alcohol and drug misuse, domestic violence and mental health concerns. We operate across West London with centres in Brent, Ealing and Hounslow as well as providing services through outreach based satellites in Hillingdon, Harrow, Kingston- upon-Thames, Richmond, Wandsworth and Merton as part of the London Councils Violence against Women and Girls consortium. EACH’s IPS project has extended our reach into Barnet, Hammersmith and Fulham. EACH provides a range of community based services, with a long history of developing specialist services to meet the needs of Black and Minority Ethnic communities who experience cultural and linguistic barriers to mainstream services. EACH is a company limited by guarantee with charitable status. Established in 1991, the organisation is recognised both locally and nationally for the innovative work it has pioneered in delivering alcohol and mental health services, primarily, in Asian communities in West London. 1.2 EACH’s Reach EACH currently has presence in the boroughs below, along with London boroughs of Richmond upon Thames, Kingston upon Thames, Wandsworth and Merton. The new IPS project will further extend EACH’s reach into Barnet and Hammersmith and Fulham. London Borough of Brent Brent is located in North-west London and is a borough that is culturally diverse with a significant ethnic population of approximately 57%. Information on the borough can be found on the www.brent.gov.uk website.
    [Show full text]
  • This Chart Shows the Ethnicity Profile of Ethnic Minority Groups in NWLH
    Profile of Children and Young people accessing Paediatric Speech and Language Therapy services -September 2014 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Harrow’s Overall Population The 2011 National Census indicates that Harrow’s population is one of the most diverse nationally, with 69.1% of residents coming from minority ethnic groups, with the largest group being of Indian ethnicity. The borough also has the largest concentration of Sri Lankan Tamils in the UK as well as having the highest density of Gujarati Hindus in the UK. Harrow is also ranked 8th nationally for linguistic diversity in the Greater London Authority’s Linguistic Diversity Index. At least 88 different languages are “spoken” in Harrow, including three categories of sign language. According to the GLA School Role Projection Service, the increased migration into the borough is projected to continue rising over the next few years. 1.2 Philosophy of our Service The speech and language therapy service at North West London Hospitals NHS Trust provides therapy services to children and young people with speech, language and communication needs (SLCN) 0-18 years in a variety of settings working in partnership with colleagues in health, education, social care others and the voluntary sector to promote a comprehensive service to all children and families taking account of cultural and ethnic background. 2.0 Scope of Audit This audit aims to provide data about the population of children and young people in the London Borough of Harrow who were accessing speech and language therapy service in August 2014. It interrogates some of the most salient data sets for CYP with SLCN e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Answers to Questions Not Answered at Mayor's Question Time
    Written Answers to questions not answered at Mayor’s Question Time on 18 November 2009 Nolan Principles Question No: 3396 / 2009 John Biggs Do you support the Nolan Principles and do you consider your office to be bound by them? Oral response Olympic ticketing – local residents Question No: 3254 / 2009 Dee Doocey Do you share my concern that despite 7 years of disruption caused by the construction of the Olympic Park, local residents will not be entitled to any discount on the purchase of tickets for the Olympic and Paralympic Games? Oral response Olympic Route Network Question No: 3634 / 2009 Victoria Borwick What consideration has been given to reserving one carriage on the Javelin for the Olympic family as an alternative to ‘Zil’ Lanes? Oral response Press conferences Question No: 3142 / 2009 Darren Johnson Given growing concern about your lack of availability to answer questions from journalists on a wide range of topics relevant to Londoners, will you agree to follow the practice of your predecessor and re-instate weekly mayoral press conferences at City Hall? Oral response Practical winter help for the elderly Question No: 3339 / 2009 Richard Barnbrook The Mayor is keen to ensure adequate provision for London’s elderly during the coming winter. What can he do to ensure that the need for awkward and stressful form filling is reduced? Many elderly people find these forms difficult, confusing and sometimes demeaning. Bear in 1 mind that many elderly folk will not bother to apply for assistance because of pride, and unwillingness to be seen as taking what they can regard as “something for nothing”.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Help Housing: Could It Play a Greater Role?
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-papers Repository Third Sector Research Centre Working Paper 11 Self-help housing: could it play a greater role? Professor David Mullins September 2010 Working Paper Paper Working 11 September 2010 September Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Definitions ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Construction of a field linking empty properties and self-help ......................................................... 4 Contemporary policy fit .................................................................................................................... 5 Origins and evolution ............................................................................................................................ 7 Estimated numbers of local organisations ......................................................................................... 9 Main types of organisation ................................................................................................................. 10 Roles and functions ............................................................................................................................ 12 Third sector characteristics ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Site Allocations Document (Regulation 18)
    SHAPING THE BOROUGH Waltham forest local plan (LP2) Draft Site Allocations Document (Regulation 18) September 2020 London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan Site Allocations - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (Regulation 18) Translation Translation London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan Site Allocations - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (Regulation 18) Contents Foreword 1 Introduction 1 Introduction and Background 3 2 Methodology and Approach to Site Selection 5 Site Allocations South Waltham Forest 7 Central Waltham Forest 82 North Waltham Forest 145 SA01 - Leyton Mills Retail Park 7 SA02 - New Spitalfields Market 10 SA03 - Bywaters, Leyton 13 SA04 - Osier Way 16 SA05 - The Score Centre 19 SA06 - Gas Holders 22 SA07 - Lea Bridge Station Sites 1, 2 and 3 25 SA08 - Former Leyton F.C. Football Ground 28 SA09 - Estate Way 31 SA10 - Low Hall Depot 34 SA11 - Leyton Leisure Lagoon 37 SA12 - Tesco, Bakers Arms 40 SA13 - Stanley Road Car Park 43 SA14 - 806 Community Place, High Road Leyton 46 SA15 - Leyton Bus Depot 49 SA16 - The Territorial Army Centre 52 SA17 - Whipps Cross University Hospital 55 SA18 - Joseph Ray Road 58 SA19 - Church Lane Car Park, Leytonstone 61 SA20 - Tesco, Leytonstone 64 SA21 - Matalan, Leytonstone 67 SA22 - Avenue Road Estate and Thorne Close 70 SA23 - Cathall Leisure Centre, The Epicentre Community Centre, Jubliee Centre, (also known as Leytonstone Leisure Centre & West Community Centre) 73 SA24 - B&M Site 76 London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan Site Allocations - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (Regulation
    [Show full text]