Singsings and Storytelling: Sounds of Oceania Audio Reformatting Project
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Pacific Islands - Online Climate Outlook Forum (OCOF) No
Pacific Islands - Online Climate Outlook Forum (OCOF) No. 145 Country: Papua New Guinea TABLE 1: Monthly Rainfall Sep-2019 Aug- Jul-2019 Station (include data 2019 Total period) 33%tile 67%tile Median (mm) Rank Total Total Rainfall (mm) (mm) (mm) Momase Region Madang (1944-2019) ? 87.0 14.0 74.3 177.9 120.7 10/70 Nadzab (1973-2019) 77.6 187.6 75.0 56.2 133.6 107.9 19/45 Wewak (1894-2019) 58.8 208.2 225.4 142.9 206.8 180.3 46/63 Vanimo (1918-2019) 206.8 99.0 137.0 127.4 193.0 155.8 30/64 Highlands Region Goroka (1948-2019) 45.2 113.2 75.4 68.0 124.7 96.8 20/57 New Guinea Islands Region Momote (1949-2019) 195.6 415.4 135.8 209.0 277.0 249.2 8/66 Kavieng (1916-2019) 212.8 294.2 135.6 143.2 209.0 169.2 26/92 Southern Region Misima (1917-2019) 131.4 172.2 82.6 103.4 255.8 183.8 23/94 Port Moresby (1875-2019) 26.8 66.7 102.4 10.6 31.0 21.0 120/122 TABLE 2: Three-month Rainfall for July to September 2019 Verification: SCOPIC forecast probabilities Three-month Total 33%tile 67%tile Median Consistent, Station Rank based on NINO3.4 April-May 2019 Near- consistent, Rainfall (mm) B-N N A-N LEPS Inconsistent? Momase Region Madang (1944-2019) 322.7 466.8 401.2 57 35 8 16 Near- Nadzab (1973-2019) 340.2 Normal 277.0 462.0 396.0 19/44 40 30 30 -3 consistent Near- Wewak (1894-2019) 492.4 Normal 466.1 591.5 543.4 27/63 74 19 7 24 consistent Below Vanimo (1918-2019) 442.8 468.0 584.0 516.0 19/60 24 33 43 0 Inconsistent normal Highlands Region Near- Goroka (1948-2019) 233.8 Normal 210.0 292.6 252.0 23/53 31 33 36 -2 consistent New Guinea Islands Region Below -
Initial Environmental Examination
Sustainable Highlands Highway Investment Program (RRP PNG 48444) Initial Environmental Examination Project Number: 48444 Date: June 2017 Document status: Final Draft Papua New Guinea: Multi-tranche Financing Facility for the Sustainable Highlands Highway Investment Program Prepared by the Department of Works (DOW) for the Asian Development Bank This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 1 Feburary 2017) Currency Unit – Kina (K) K1.00 = $0.32 $1.00 = K3.10 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank AEP – aggregate extraction plan AIDS – acquired immunodeficiency syndrome BOQ – bill of quantities CEMP - Construction Environmental Management Plan CEPA – Conservation and Environmental Protection Authority CEPA-MD – CEPA-Managing Director CRVA _ Climate Risk Vulnerability Assessment DSC – Design and Supervision Consultant DMR – Department of Mineral Resources DLPP – Department of Lands and Physical Planning DOW – Department of Works EARF – environmental assessment and review framework EHSG _ Environmental Health and Safety Guidelines EHSO _ Environment, -
ENVIRONMENTAL and SOCIAL BASELINE REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized and IMPACT ASSESSMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL BASELINE REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PNG AGRICULTURE COMMERCIALIZATION AND Public Disclosure Authorized DIVERSIFICATION PROJECT (PACD) Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared for the Department of Agriculture and Livestock March 2019 Public Disclosure Authorized 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 4 A.1 Methodology .......................................................................................................... 4 A.2 Project Description ................................................................................................ 5 A.3 Geographical coverage .......................................................................................... 6 PART ONE: BASELINE REPORT ......................................................................................... 7 B. Country Profile .............................................................................................................. 7 B.1 System of Government .......................................................................................... 8 National .............................................................................................................................. 8 Provincial ........................................................................................................................... 9 District............................................................................................................................. -
48444-004: Sustainable Highlands
Initial Environmental Examination (Updated as of August 2019) Project Number: 48444-004 Date: August 2019 Document status: Updated Version PNG: Sustainable Highlands Highway Investment Program – Tranche 1 Prepared by the Department of Works (DOW) for the Asian Development Bank This Initial Environmental Examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or Staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (As of 31 July 2019) Currency Unit – Kina (K) K1.00 = $ 0.2945 $1.00 = K3.3956 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank AEP – Aggregate Extraction Plan AIDS – Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome BOD - Biochemical Oxygen Demand BOQ – Bill of Quantities CEMP - Contractor’s Environmental Management Plan CEPA – Conservation and Environmental Protection Authority CEPA-MD – CEPA-Managing Director CRVA _ Climate Risk Vulnerability Assessment CSC - Construction Supervision Consultant DLPP - Department of Lands and Physical Planning DMR – Department of Mineral Resources DNPM - Department of National Planning and Monitoring DOW – Department of Works EARF – Environmental Assessment and Review Framework EHSG _ Environmental Health and Safety Guidelines -
PNG: Sustainable Highlands Highway Investment Program -Tranche 2
Initial Environmental Examination Project Number: 48444 Date: February 2020 Document status: Draft PNG: Sustainable Highlands Highway Investment Program -Tranche 2 Volume II: Jogi River Bridge (Km 298+900) to Waghi River Bridge (Km 463+900) Prepared by the Department of Works (DOW) for Asian Development Bank This Initial Environmental Examination ( Volume II) is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of February 2020) Currency Unit – Kina (K) K1.00 = $0.294 $1.00 = K3.396 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank AIDS – Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome AP Affected Persons BOD – Biochemical Oxygen Demand CEMP – Contractor’s Environmental Management Plan CEPA – Conservation and Environmental Protection Authority CSC – Construction Supervision Consultant DC – Design Consultant DFAT – Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade of the Government of Australia DMS – Detailed Measurement Survey DNPM – Department of National Planning and Monitoring DOW – Department of Works EARF – Environmental Assessment and Review Framework EHSG _ Environmental Health and Safety Guidelines EHSO _ Environment, -
MOMASE REGION • East Sepik Province • Madang Province
MOMASE REGION • East Sepik Province • Madang Province • Morobe Province • Sandaun Province (West Sepik) Meri Toksave 2014/ 2015 38 EAST SEPIK PROVINCE Hospitals • Boram Wewak General Hospital Located at Boram site Rd. Operating hours: 8am-6pm. Ph: 456 2166 • Maprik District Hospital Ph: 71487280 or the Family Support Centre: 70859361 or 71395068 Police • Wewak Police Station Located in the heart of Wewak town. Ph: 456 2633 Counselling • Nana Kundi Crisis Centre Based in Maprik district. Nana Kundi Crisis Centre provides: Counselling, mediations (conflict resolutions), men and boys outreach awareness, Paralegal support, welfare services (as part of counselling) referrals and repatriation. Opening hours: 8am - 4pm Ph: landline is not working but the centre still operates. • St Anna’s Crisis Centre Based in Wasara. Provides the following services: counselling, crisis service support, mediation, men and boys outreach and referrals. Ph: 71325060 Meri Toksave 2014/ 2015 39 • Mama Emma Based in Gawi. Provides the following services: Crisis service support, men and boys outreach, counselling, mediation and referrals, legal advice. Ph: 70236018 • Family for Change Based in Wewak town. Provides the following services: crisis service support, mediation, counselling, paralegal support, family support, men and boys outreach awareness and referrals. Opening hours: Not operating on Saturdays. Ph: 73778013 • Youth Friendly Centre Location: In Maprik just on the main highway leading to west Sepik, adjacent to local level government officer. Right in town. Services: counseling for issues affecting young people (trauma, violence, abuse, family issues). Ph: 73976140 Legal Advice • Nana Kundi Crisis Centre Based in Maprik district. Nana Kundi Crisis Centre provides: Counselling, mediations (conflict resolutions), men and boys outreach awareness, Paralegal support, welfare services (as part of counselling) referrals and repatriation. -
Ethnic Structure, Inequality and Governance of the Public Sector in Papua New Guinea
Ethnic Structure, Inequality and Governance of the Public Sector in Papua New Guinea Ray Anere 2004 Part of UNRISD Project on Ethnic Structure, Inequality and Governance of the Public Sector. All unauthorized citation, duplication or distribution prohibited without the approval of UNRISD and the authors. Table of Contents Executive Summary i Introduction 1 Conceptual Issues 2 Ethnic Cleavages: A Brief Description 6 Socio-Economic Inequalities 10 Politics of Ethnicity and Nationalism 20 The Management of Ethnicity in the Public Sector 23 Political Parties 23 Parliament 28 Executive 33 Civil Service 38 Institutional Reforms: Affirmative Action 42 Analysis 52 Conclusion 62 Bibliography 73 Executive Summary Papua New Guinea is indeed a multipolar, ethnically fragmented society. This presents unique problems to governance and the management of inequality in public sector institutions – political parties, the parliament, cabinet and the civil service. The clash of values between traditions and Western democracy and capitalism has meant that elite consensus is thwarted in many issues and instances. This has resulted in the instability of the political parties, the parliament and executive (or cabinet), and political interference in the civil service. The performance of these institutions in the management of governance, inequality, and the ethnic diversity in the country has not been effective. Accordingly Papua New Guinea was ranked 133 out of 170 nations in the 2000 Human Development Report of the United Nations Development Programme. The living standards of the people have not been significantly improved over the past 28-29 years of nationhood. Ironically, Papua New Guinea is surviving democracy. As a developing country, its democratic longevity has spanned some 40 years unlike other developing countries that have had their democratic systems disrupted in less than 20 to 25 years of statehood. -
Nomenclature Abbreviations
Abbreviations * As a prefix, indicates a proto language word /?/ glottal stop 2′ compound for 3 = 2 + 1 or rarely 1 + 1 + 1 but numeral for 4 2″ distinct numeral for 3 but 4 is a compound, usually 2 + 2, rarely 5 - 1 or 2 + 1 + 1 AN Austronesian languages BC or BCE Before Christ, that is before the Current Era taken as before the period of Christ BP Before the present CE or AD In the current era, that is after the year of the Lord (Domino/Dominum) Christ CSQ, MQ Counting System Questionnaire; Measurement Questionnaire d. dialect IMP Indigenous Mathematics Project Manus type Lean used this to refer to counting systems that used subtraction from 10 such as 7=10-3, 8=10-2, 9=10-1, often with the meaning e.g. for 7 as 3 needed to com- plete the group MC Micronesian Motu type Lean used this to refer to counting systems that used pairs such as 6=2x3, 7=2x3+1, 8=2x4, 9=2x4+1 NAN Non-Austronesian (also called Papuan) languages NCQ, CQN Noun, classifier, quantifier; classifier, quantifier, noun NQC, QCN Noun, quantifier, classifier; quantifier, classifier, noun NTM New Tribes Mission, PNG PAN Proto Austronesian PN Polynesian PNG Papua New Guinea POC Proto Oceanic QC, CQ Order of quantifier-classifier; classifier-quantifier respectively SHWNG South Halmahera West New Guinea (AN Non-Oceanic language of the Central- Eastern Malayo-Polynesian, a subgroup of Proto-Malayo-Polynesian) after Tryon (2006) SIL Summer Institute of Linguistics SOV Order of words in a sentence: Subject Object Verb SVO Order of words in a sentence: Subject Verb Object TNG Trans New Guinea Phylum Nomenclature The Australian system of numbering is used. -
Papua New Guinea High Frequency Phone Survey on COVID-19 Public Disclosure Authorized
THE WORLD BANK Papua New Guinea High Frequency Phone Survey On COVID-19 Public Disclosure Authorized RESULTS FROM ROUND 1 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Photography throughout Kalo Fainu / World Bank Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................................4 Background ...................................................................................................................................................................6 Objective ....................................................................................................................................................................6 General Background on Papua New Guinea ................................................................................................6 COVID-19 Outbreak in Papua New Guinea ...................................................................................................7 Data Collection ............................................................................................................................................................9 Description of Survey Objectives & Instrument .........................................................................................9 Methodology and Fieldwork ..............................................................................................................................9 Wealth Index...........................................................................................................................................................10 -
PNG Mainland and Manus Island: Above Normal Rainfall Is Favoured in May
Pacific Islands - Online Climate Outlook Forum (OCOF) No. 163 Country: Papua New Guinea TABLE 1: Monthly Rainfall Mar-2021 Feb- Jan-2021 Station (include data 2021 Total period) 33%tile 67%tile Median (mm) Rank Total Total Rainfall (mm) (mm) (mm) Momase Region Madang (1944-2021) 106.2 274.2 415.2 310.6 401.1 343.6 56/72 Nadzab (1973-2021) 128.0 234.4 107.2 142.1 206.8 162.6 7/46 Wewak (1956-2021) 145.2 319.0 185.8 132.0 182.4 153.4 45/65 Vanimo (1918-2021) 250.0 793.6 141.6 214.8 360.0 276.8 6/69 Highlands Region Goroka (1948-2021) 133.4 372.0 242.8 208.1 285.8 240.0 30/59 New Guinea Islands Region Momote (1949-2021) 91.2 408.2 225.2 275.0 336.0 304.2 12/65 Kavieng (1916-2021) 116.0 359.2 230.8 283.8 373.3 342.0 22/88 Southern Region Misima (1917-2021) 163.0 208.4 387.6 217.2 320.7 254.1 79/96 Port Moresby (1875-2021) 273.8 281.0 283.8 160.5 275.9 216.0 100/133 TABLE 2: Three-month Rainfall for January to March 2021 SCOPIC forecast probabilities Verification: Three-month Total 33%tile 67%tile Median Consistent, Near- Station Rank based on NINO3.4 October-November 2020 consistent, Inconsistent? Rainfall (mm) B-N N A-N LEPS Momase Region Madang (1944-2021) 795.6 Below normal 901.2 1078.9 975.8 18/72 54 20 26 9 Consistent Nadzab (1973-2021) 469.6 Normal 436.7 533.3 471.4 22/46 52 27 21 10 Near-consistent Wewak (1956-2021) 650.0 Above normal 368.4 453.2 428.3 63/65 21 34 45 4 Consistent Vanimo (1918-2021) 1185.2 Above normal 761.9 943.9 876.4 55/66 38 41 21 1 Near-consistent Highlands Region Goroka (1948-2021) 748.2 Normal 647.9 785.8 709.8 -
2.3 Papua New Guinea Road Assessment
2.3 Papua New Guinea Road Assessment 4.1 Papua New Guinea Government Contact List The land transport system comprises the national road system (8,762 km), provincial (approximately 8,100 km), and perhaps another eight thousand district, local and other roads, and eight hundred bridges. The national road include 3,335 km of designated “roads of national importance,” often called “priority roads,” and the focus of most maintenance and improvement efforts. There are 2,647 km sealed roads, almost all in the national system. Central Western Highlands, Eastern Highlands, East Sepik, Madang and West New Britain have the most extensive networks. Apart from the Highlands Highway linking Lae with Goroka, Kundiawa, Mount Hagen, Mendi and their hinterlands, most of the national network is discontinuous, serving the relatively well- developed areas around the main commercial centers. The poorest parts of the country are the most poorly served by the road network.Geographic features, most noticeably several very large rivers, divide the road system into several distinct networks. The road system’s length has not increased since 2000. The government’s current policy is to improve the existing road network, rather than expand it (expansion would deny maintenance funds to existing roads and result in a net system loss. Landslides, floods and other natural disasters are frequent, necessitating repeated emergency works. Roads conditions are generally not good, but the Department of Works (DOW) has made considerable progress in maintaining, rehabilitating and upgrading national roads. The length of national roads classified in “Good” condition (according to the DOW’s RAMS database) rose from 17% in 2004 to 32% in 2010. -
Omase Region
PAPUA NEW GUINEA NATIONAL DISASTER CENTRE MOMASE REGION REPORT ON RAPID ASSESSMENT OF DROUGHT & FROST IMPACTS, 30 AUGUST TO 11 SEPTEMBER, 2015 Woman washing clothes in stagnat water, Momase Region Dagua Dried vegetation on Long Island Processing sago on Koil Island Compiled by: Vini Talai- NDC Team Leader, Ray Kangu- Department of Health, Elick Guaf- NARI, Major Michael Marai- PNGDF, Gerard Ng- UN Resident Coordinator’s Office and Justine Nankinga, UNICEF 1.0 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Key Objective ........................................................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Assessment Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 STATISTICS OF AFFECTED PROVINCES......................................................................................................... 6 3.0 KEY FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................................ 7 3.1 GENERAL ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................................................. 7 3.2 FOOD SECURITY ......................................................................................................................................