Draft

HARROW COUNCIL SCHOOL TRAVEL PLAN STRATEGY

1.0 INTRODUCTION...... 2 2.0 MAIN PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES...... 3 2.1 The School Run and Car Use ...... 3 2.3 Walking to School ...... 4 2.4 Parental Safety Concerns ...... 4 2.5 Parental Choice for school admission...... 4 3.0 PAST AND ONGOING INITIATIVES TO ADDRESS PROBLEMS.. 5 3.1 Safe Routes to School Programme...... 5 3.2 Road Safety Education ...... 5 3.3 Council’s Provision of School Transport ...... 6 4.0 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES...... 6 5.0 STRATEGY ...... 7 5.1 Development of School Travel Plan (STP) and Related Measures . 7 6.0 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME...... 10 6.1 Setting up a School Travel Plan...... 10

Draft

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 There is an increasing problem with the number of children who are taken to and from school by car. Over the last few years, car use on the school run has increased causing traffic congestion, increased pollution, and risk of accidents to children and adverse impacts on their health and the local environment. The concerns about the problems are present at nearly all the school sites and some head teachers/school staff and parent governors regularly patrol and advise parents about travel and road safety issues outside the school gates. Added to these is loss of opportunities for children to acquire the necessary skills to be streetwise and lead a healthier lifestyle through walking and cycling. 1.2 The Government’s Transport White Paper and the Mayor of ’s Transport Strategy place strong emphasis on addressing the problems associated with car travel to school. School travel has therefore been identified by both the UK Government and the London Mayor as a priority area where intervention to reduce the ‘school run’ could offer many transport and health benefits. Suggested interventions include those proposed in the 1998/99 STAG (School Travel Advisory Group) report. They include: • Better use of resources allocated to statutory schools transport. • Training for children on how to travel safely and responsibly as cyclists, pedestrians or passengers. • Improvements within and around schools (such as provision of lockers, secure cycle storage and bus bays). • Affordable bus-travel to school for all children in compulsory education. • Campaigns to raise driver awareness of relevant issues. • Improved enforcement of speed, parking and other traffic regulations. • Involving other relevant players (such as recognition of school travel plan (STP) initiatives in the school curriculum, training for school governors, incentives for teachers and other school staff to promote STP and linkage with health initiatives including Health Improvement Plans). 1.3 With nearly 90 schools and some 33,000 pupils in the borough, school travel is a major issue for Council. It is increasingly concerned about the number of children who are taken to and from school by car. 1.4 Targets have been set by the Department of Transport (DfT), Transport for London (TfL) and the and Skills (DfES) to require local authorities to see that all schools adopt School Travel Plans by the year 2010. There is also a target set by the DfT and the London Mayor to reduce accidents to children by 50% by the year 2010. Additionally, the London Mayor, in the guidance for Local Implementation Plans (LIP), is requiring local authorities to review road safety and travel issues with schools and or groups of schools by 2008. 1.5 In the light of this, the Council welcomes all national and regional policy-initiatives to reduce the school-run related problems. Harrow has also actively pursued many initiatives to encourage walking, cycling and bus use on the school journey. These include highway measures,

Draft

safer routes to school (SRtS) programme, pedestrian training, cycle training, walking buses, supply of maps showing location of schools and the nearest cycle and bus routes and walk to school week. 1.6 Progress to date suggests that there is considerable scope for reducing the number of cars parked at the school gate and that the co- operation, support and participation of school and local communities are an important criterion for success. Further progress will not be possible without this continued involvement. Harrow will continue to forge effective partnerships in its implementation of its School Travel Strategy. 1.7 The development of a School Travel Strategy will provide an opportunity for the school community to become more involved in travel issues and increase awareness for safety and environmental concerns in the local area. It will also promote the benefits of walking, cycling and use of public transport as a sustainable alternative to the car.

2.0 MAIN PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES

2.1 The School Run and Car Use 2.1.1 Surveys carried out in Harrow during the recent walk-to-school week indicates that X% of pupils travel to school, by car with proportionately fewer children walking (W%), cycling (C%) or using public transport (P%). The proportion travelling to school by car in Harrow is high compared to the national average, which itself has seen the doubling of car use since 1990. The school run has therefore been a major contributor to traffic congestion on Harrow’s roads at peak periods. 2.1.2 Use of car is exacerbated by the fact that the density of public transport is generally low. A map of Harrow’s public transport accessibility level (PTAL) shows that many parts of Harrow (except for a few isolated areas around major town centres) are poorly served. This reflects the generally lower population and/or land use density. For a large section of the population living in these poorly served areas, use of public transport is an inadequate option. This means that some parents understandably feel there is no alternative to the car, especially if the school is some distance away and cannot practically be reached walking or cycling. 2.1.3 In addition, Harrow has one on the highest level of car ownership in London with X% of households owning at least a car/van, and Y% owning 2 or more cars. As a result, many households may own a second car that is available for the school journey, and are therefore more inclined to drive children to school.

2.2 Cycling to School

Draft

2.2.1 Schools have shown a reluctance to allow pupils to cycle to school because of parking and security problems. Parents have echoed this reluctance because of the perceived dangers to young cyclists. Recent initiatives by Transport for London in supplying secure cycle parking facilities may help to address at least one of these problems. There is increasing interest being shown by schools to the promotion and use of cycles and many now ask for evidence from pupils that they have attended a training course before allowing them to ride to school. 2.2.2 The promotion of cycling to school children is included in the regular visits made to schools who are now looking at ways of including some form of practical training for pupils. Links to schools from the local cycle networks will provide better and safer access for pupils who want to use cycles on the school run

2.3 Walking to School 2.3.1 Encouraging children to walk or cycle to school will improve their health and also for first and middle school pupils will give them the road safety skills needed when they transfer to the High schools and travel on their own. The lack of road skills and awareness is apparent with current high proportion of road casualties in the 11-14 age group. The development of School Travel Plans (a by-product of this school travel strategy) will assist schools to promote road safety and support a change in travel modes. The programme of Safe Routes to School is also providing improvements on the main walking routes by providing new or improved crossing points and better pavement areas around schools.

2.4 Parental Safety Concerns 2.4.1 Busy roads, increased car use and pressures on parents mean that vehicle congestion on the “school run” is increasing and the number of pupils walking or cycling is decreasing. Many parents feel that they have no other alternative than to drive their children to and from school because of fears for the children’s safety both from traffic and other issues. As traffic congestion increases, these fears get worse, and so does the traffic congestion. Parents will need reassurance and convincing that they and their child will be able to use the roads safely if there is to be a significant shift in travel mode. 2.5 Parental Choice for school admission 2.5.1 Parents do need to be encouraged to select schools that are within easy and safe walking distance. Harrow currently gives parents a choice of which school their children attend based on a “Road Priority List” with four levels, but it is limited by the availability of places. Many children are most likely to be offered a place at their local school, which would normally be within walking distance. However, some parents exercise their rights to choose by selecting other schools that are further away from home. Such parents are more likely to use the car for the school journey because of travel difficulties. This results in higher levels of car use. The Council also

Draft

has a number of “faith” schools that attract pupils from within and outside the whole borough. These again tend to attract a larger number of car journeys. 2.4.1 From 2005, new admission rules will apply. This will give parents a choice of school, but where a school is oversubscribed new criteria for admission have been developed. These include: • Special Educational Needs (SEN): • Childrens’ medical reasons: • Parents’ medical reasons: • Children looked after by the authority: • Sibling link: • Distance measured from home to school.

A limiting factor will be on class sizes, which should not exceed 30 pupils. 2.4.2 If under any one of the above criteria more applications are received than there are places, the tiebreaker of distance will be applied. Distance is measured in a straight line from home to school. This new criterion will be monitored to see if there is any significant change in travel patterns.

3.0 PAST AND ONGOING INITIATIVES TO ADDRESS PROBLEMS

3.1 Safe Routes to School Programme The Council has a programme of carrying out Safe Routes to School studies to address the problem of car usage and encourage the school community to comment on problems and dangers that prevent them from walking or cycling to and from school. The studies also highlight to the schools, the safety and environmental problems caused by cars on the school run and involve staff, pupils and parents in looking at ways that the school journey may be improved. These studies do take time to complete and the current programme only covers some three schools per year. 3.2 Road Safety Education The Council has over many years maintained regular road-safety education visits to nurseries and schools to talk to parents and children about road and traffic issues. With the increase in traffic over the years, especially on the school run, the talks have been focussed on the use of sustainable transport and the benefits of walking and cycling to children, their health and the local environment. They highlight to first and middle school children the need to change attitudes about the way they travel and for the need to reduce car travel on the school journey. Campaigns for walking and cycling are pursued in the schools such as the Walking Bus, Walk to School Weeks and Cycle days.

Draft

3.3 Council’s Provision of School Transport The Council’s School Transport currently carries about approximately 460 children with special educational needs (SEN) to and from school each day using a fleet of minibuses adapted with wheelchair access where required and also private hire cars as appropriate for the pupils. It currently provides 24 minibuses for children attending Harrow’s four main special schools and additional buses for those attending special units in mainstream schools within or outside the Borough. Pupils who have problems that make group travel difficult or who attend residential schools outside the borough are transported by taxi. 48 taxis are currently used for this purpose. Continuing transport support is also provided for the majority of those SEN pupils when they are aged 16-19 to attend college. The problems with current service arrangements are: a) that access to Council transport is not subject to clear criteria and provision is not formally reviewed b) that training of pupils to become independent travellers using public transport is insufficiently developed c) that there is no current strategy to integrate or share services with those provided by other parts of the Council or other providers of transport service. Such a strategy would make better use of existing resources and could reduce some traffic pressures

4.0 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

4.1 The aim of the School Travel Strategy is to provide or facilitate safer routes to every school in Harrow through the development of a range of measures that will enable pupils to make all, or a substantial part of their journey by walking, cycling or by using public transport. SRtS and STPs will form an integral part of this strategy. It will build on the success of SRtS schemes and integrate them with travel plans, traffic management and with health, social and educational facilities. 4.2 A School Travel Plan will enable individual schools to put forward ideas and solutions to reducing car use, identifying problem areas that discourage walking and cycling, and increase awareness of other travel initiatives that will benefit the school and local community. The plan will be an opportunity for the Council as a highway authority in partnership with the school community (including children, parents and staff) and service providers to identify and propose solutions to address school-travel related issues. 4.3 The following objectives have been devised to deliver the aim of the STS: • To increase opportunities for all children (including those with special education needs) to travel to and from school in safety using

Draft

environmentally sustainable modes of transport and thereby improving pupils’ independent mobility and reducing car use. • To remove deterrents to walking and cycling by integrating SRtS and STPs with other programmes to improve the safety and convenience of crossing facilities, include mobility impairment and safety considerations into all schemes, increase the number of safe crossing opportunities and improve the quality of the footway and cycle tracks. • To co-operate with public transport providers and operators to make services more suitable for use by school and college students, and to identify scope for additional services. • To promote the role of walking, cycling and public transport as a good alternative to the car emphasising their health and environmental benefits, with a view to increasing the proportion of trips made to and from school by these modes. • To encourage individual schools to prepare, produce or review travel plans and implement related travel initiatives in partnership with the local authority, business community, parents, pupils, teachers and any other relevant body. This will help meet the target set by TfL that all schools should adopt School Travel Plans by the year 2010.

5.0 STRATEGY

The Council has adopted the London-wide strategy of providing or facilitating the provision of safer routes to every school in Harrow by 2010. The strategy will not only achieve a modal shift, it will also improve children’s safety and contribute towards the national and London-wide road safety targets (see Road Safety Plan). There will be two facets to the strategy: (1) development of school-travel plans (STP) and related measures and (2) integration of STPs with other programmes. These are described briefly below. 5.1 Development of School Travel Plan (STP) and Related Measures

5.1.1 The Council is keen to see the borough-wide development of safer routes to schools (SRtS) and to support, in particular, those schools that are committed to taking action themselves and working in partnership with the Council and other agencies to change how children travel to school. It has therefore made the development of school travel plans (STPs) by individual schools and groups of schools as the foundation for SRtS programme. The development of a School Travel Plan will provide an opportunity for the school community to become more involved in travel issues and increase awareness for safety and environmental concerns in the local area. 5.1.2 The Council will continue to contact and invite all schools in the borough to bid for inclusion in future years’ programme. Schools will be expected to demonstrate tangible evidence of their commitment to encouraging safer and more sustainable travel to school such as

Draft

the establishment of a SRtS working group, and a commitment to developing a STP. The approach being taken is to build upon the enthusiasm from schools, their pupils, teachers and parents in developing measures that are appropriate to the local environment. 5.1.3 The development of STPs will encompass all the schools in Harrow – private or public and those with or without facilities for SEN. No distinction will be made between private, voluntary aided or local authority schools. Every school will be encouraged to consider ways to improve pupil safety and achieve modal shift, and subject to resource constraints, all will be offered support and assistance. Harrow Council will promote the STP initiative at all levels, through school curriculum, school assemblies, road safety workshops, technical articles, conferences, educational programmes, local community group meetings, and PTA forums. 5.1.4 The Council will provide advice and information to schools to help them in developing STPs. This will include advice and guidance on how to carry out travel surveys, develop effective working groups and set realistic targets for changing travel behaviour. The Council will also encourage all schools to participate in monitoring the progress that they have made towards meeting local and London- wide targets. 5.1.5 A strategic assessment will be undertaken to prioritise schools that show enthusiasm for the STP initiatives. In general, this will be based on their potential contribution to the Council’s traffic growth and casualty reduction targets and to the implementation of integrated transport strategies. More specifically, the assessment will be based on the potential to achieve modal shift by identifying and taking account of the number of: 1. pupils that travel by car to and/or live beyond walking distance of school – the greater the number the greater the effort necessary to achieve modal shift but there is also a greater scope or latitude for: ƒ improved education of pupils, parents and schools on sustainable transport (including changing school policy) and its contribution to the local environment, ƒ assessing the role of home to school transport and whether to encourage or expand its use, ƒ exploring how education, social services and community transport could support schools, ƒ economy of scale in car-share schemes and in making a better, efficient and effective use of existing publicly provided transport services, including those provided by public transport operators and the specialist ones provided by the Council in relation to SEN, 2. pupils that live within two kilometres of the school – will have dual purposes: (a) make it easy to identify, organise and develop a programme of road safety/awareness training and cycle training and parent escort roster for cycling or walking buses – all with a view to addressing parental concerns for children safety, and (b) help identify traffic or engineering measure that should be undertaken, including: ƒ safer road crossing points for pedestrians and cyclists, ƒ new or improved routes for cyclists and pedestrians,

Draft

ƒ new or more direct pedestrian / cyclist entrances to schools, ƒ cycle storage and locking facilities at schools, ƒ traffic calming ƒ controlled car parking outside schools, ƒ priority measures for public transport, ƒ improved conditions of roads and paths including provision of lighting and CCTV; and 3. child pedestrian/cycle accidents within 2 kilometres of the school – the identification and treatment of accident black spots around schools will help allay parental fears for the safety or perception of safety of children allowed to go to schools on their own. 5.1.6 The preparation of school travel plans will include extensive consultation, including questionnaire surveys with pupils. Active involvement of the schools (especially the head teachers or board of governors) in the definition of local schemes will be essential in order to gain commitment and to ensure that the schools adopt the STP. Schools will be asked to include travel information into the School Prospectus and to remind parents of the benefits of walking, cycling and use of public transport when making their choice of school. 5.1.7 Measures proposed in the STP will also take account of local (resident) opinion, as well as technical input from Transportation Section and other Council staff across a range of different disciplines. These currently include such disciplines as road safety, public transport, walking and cycling, but in the future the consultation will extend to staff in planning, education and social service. 5.2 Integration of STPs with other Programmes 5.2.1 A key aim of this strategy is to promote walking, cycling and public transport as a sustainable means of travel to schools. It also aims to create safe, convenient, affordable and sustainable routes, benefiting not only the school journey but also providing a network of connected routes for the benefit of the whole community. The Council will pay particular attention to interchange between modes and appropriate planning of such facilities to assist in developing seamless journeys. The provision of information on the availability of such routes, as well as fare prices and timetables for public transport will assist pupils and parents in their travel choices. 5.2.2 The Council will therefore seek to ensure the integration of the school travel strategy programme with wider traffic management measures, including those for walking, cycling and bus use. It will seek to achieve effective joint working and co-ordination of road safety education, environmental and health education, and awareness campaigns with plans for physical measures. 5.2.3 Officers from the Council’s Transportation Section (of Urban Living Directorate) who are responsible for discharging its duties as a highway authority are developing links with those in the Council’s People First Directorate (formerly known as education and social service department). This will ensure that the Council’s policies for

Draft

more sustainable transport (and the School Travel Strategy programme in particular) are reflected in its handling of school transport provision, and more generally in its contract with schools on transport-related issues. Each directorate will nominate an officer to act as a key point of contact between the two directorates. This will facilitate closer links to ensure that education and transport in Harrow is effectively ‘joined-up’. 5.2.4 Close links will also be established with planners responsible for securing planning conditions and legal agreements. This will help ensure that school travel issues are integrated not just with health and education but also with land use and general transport issues. 5.2.5 Schools, governors, police officers, community group representatives, local businesses and health professionals have been actively involved (to varying degrees) in the Safer Rotes to School schemes implemented at Rooks Heath, Vaughan, Stanburn and West Lodge. The Council will continue to work with these and others, including transport operators and TfL as STP and SRtS initiatives are extended to all the schools in Harrow. The Council will also encourage schools to involve police officers, health visitors and school nurses, local residents, bus operators and other third parties in developing and implementing their own STPs.

6.0 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME

6.1 Setting up a School Travel Plan 6.1.1 Officers from Harrow’s Road Safety Team are available to help and advise schools about the process of writing a travel plan. They already carry out a comprehensive range of road safety activities and visits to Harrow’s Schools. The projects have been developed over the years to cater for the varying road safety issues and campaigns. 6.1.2 The focus on school visits has more recently been directed towards safe pedestrian and cycle use and has highlighted the problems of car use, road safety concerns, congestion and pollution in the area around schools. 6.1.3 Initially a small group of people from the school – head teacher or member of school staff, governors, parent representatives will meet with a School Travel Advisor or Road Safety Officer who will be able to give advice as to how to develop the plan. 6.1.4 The school group will ideally need to: • Appoint a School champion from the working group to oversee the plan • Promote alternative travel to school staff and visitors • Promote walking and cycling for health and environmental reasons • Arrange for pedestrian and cycle training to be available to pupils • Include school travel issues in the school curriculum

Draft

• Look at ways to Improve facilities for pedestrians and cyclists • Link the plan with other school initiatives – Healthy Schools, Eco Schools etc. • Liaise with traffic engineers to promote and assist with Safe Routes to School projects What the plan should include: • Description of the school – location, pupils numbers • Consultation with staff, pupils, parents and the local community to identify school travel problems • Regular surveys of travel mode for school staff, pupils and parents • Identification of road safety problems on the school journey that can be addressed through Safe routes to School studies • Include the promotion of, where appropriate: ƒ “Walking Buses” ƒ Pedestrian training for first school children ƒ Participation in “Walk to School Weeks” ƒ Curriculum based activities and Road safety visits ƒ Provision of Cycle parking and the availability of cycle training for pupils ƒ Travel information for staff and new parents with recommendations that promote the use of public transport facilities, walking, cycling and car sharing ƒ Regular updates of travel information in school newsletters and publications ƒ Theatre group presentations on Travel awareness ƒ (For some SEN schools) specialist travel training • Proposals for monitoring and reporting, on a regular basis, any changes to travel mode and future initiatives

6.1.5 Historically, school travel plan initiatives have focused on pre secondary school children. However, in light of the LIP guidance, the borough will now address secondary and private sector schools to develop travel plans. In doing so, the Council will seek to encourage partnerships with schools to develop Travel Plans and where there are identified traffic problems to include them in the Safe Routes to School programme. This would aim to create a climate for action between the school and the Council to help deliver an all-embracing approach to home-to-school travel and child safety throughout the borough. 6.1.6 Schools taking part would be asked to develop a safety and environmental culture within the school and to encourage and involve staff, pupils and parents to take part through their class

Draft

work. In this way, best use will be made of any improved infrastructure, encouraging a wider range of travel to school choices. 6.1.7 There has been some reluctance on the part of schools to develop travel plans because of the additional work required to set up and monitor the plan. 6.1.8 Currently two schools in the borough have developed and implemented travel plans. A further sixteen schools are currently in the process of setting up a working group to develop a plan. These schools have come forward from SRtS and Cycle parking schemes. All schools will have been contacted by early in 2005 about the requirement to develop a travel plan. 6.1.9 Bids have been made to Transport for London under the Borough Spending Plan (BSP) process to carry out further SRtS studies at a number of schools over the next three years and details of these are shown below. These schools will be required to have a STP in place before funding for the study and recommended works can be obtained.

Draft

Safe Routes to School Programme 2005/06 – 2007/08 - Funding Bids to Transport for London

ESTIMATED COST YEAR DETAIL (£000K)

Initial SRtS surveys, consultation and minor works at: Longfield F and M Schools (to include Buckingham College 40 and Day Nursery) Initial SRtS surveys, consultation and minor works at: Cannon Lane F & M (Heathfield School) 40 2005/6 Initial SRtS surveys, consultation and minor works at: Priestmead F & M schools 40 Identified works at St. John Fisher F & M School 100 Investigation, engineering works and promotional activities at Moriah Jewish Day School 50 Funding of 50% of estimated costs for staffing a School Travel post 19

Major works identified from 2004/05 surveys at: Longfield First and Middle School 130 Major works identified from 2004/05 surveys at: Cannon Lane First and Middle School 150 Major works identified from 2004/05 surveys at: Priestmead First and Middle School 125 2006/7 Initial SRtS surveys, consultation and minor works at: Stag Lane F & M School 40 Initial SRtS surveys, consultation and minor works at: Little F & M School 40 Initial SRtS surveys, consultation and minor works at: Glebe F & M and Kenmore Park F & M Schools. 40 Funding of 50% of estimated costs for staffing a School Travel post 20

Major works identified from 2005/06 surveys at: Stag Lane F & M, 125 Major works identified from 2005/06 surveys at: F & M, 140 Major works identified from 2005/06 surveys at: Kenmore Park F & M and Glebe 140 2007/8 Initial SRtS surveys, consultation and minor works at: Belmont F & M Schools 40 Initial SRtS surveys, consultation and minor works at: St Josephs F & M Schools 40 Initial SRtS surveys, consultation and minor works at: Elmgrove F & M Schools 40 Funding of 50% of estimated costs for staffing a School Travel post F & M Schools 21

Draft

School Program- Pupil School 20mph Parking School name Address Traffic Safety med for numbers Travel Plan zone problems? Zone SRtS Alexandra School - Special Alexandra Avenue, Harrow. N/A - school Main road no no Needs School HA2 9DX transport Pangbourne Drive, Aylward First & Middle School 470 Residential no no Y Stanmore. HA7 4RE

Belmont First School 220 Developing Hibbert Road, Harrow from Cycle Main road yes no 2007/8 Y Weald, HA3 7JT Parking Belmont Middle School 280 initiative

Cannon Lane First School 370 Cannonbury Avenue, To develop Residential yes no 2005/6 Y Pinner, HA5 1TS Cannon Lane Middle School 350

Cedars First School 280 As part of Y Whittlesea Road, Harrow Residential 20mph 2004/5 Weald, HA3 6LS Cedars Middle School 330 zone As part of Earlsmead First and Middle Arundel Drive, South 440 To develop Residential SRtS no 2004/5 Y School Harrow, HA2 8PW process Kenmore Avenue, Kenton, Elmgrove First School 240 HA3 8LU To develop Residential no no 2007/8 Y Elmgrove Middle School 320

D'Arcy Gardens, Kenton, Glebe First and Middle School 250 To develop Residential no no 2006/7 Y HA3 9JU

Grange First School 290 Welbeck Road, Harrow, In discussion Residential no no Y HA2 0RJ Grange Middle School 300

Grimsdyke First and Middle Sylvia Avenue, , 490 Residential yes no Y School HA5 4QE

Draft

School Programm Pupil School 20mph Parking School name Address Traffic Safety ed for numbers Travel Plan zone problems? Zone SRtS

Kenmore Park First School 300 Moorhouse Road, Kenton, To develop Residential no no 2006/7 Y HA3 9JA Kenmore Park Middle School 340

Little Stanmore First and Middle St. Davids Drive, , 230 To develop Residential no 1994/5 2006/7 Y School HA8 6JH

Longfield First School 300 To develop Dukes Avenue, North with SRtS Main road yes no 2005/6 Y Harrow, HA2 7NZ Longfield Middle School 350 study

Marlborough First and Middle Marlborough Hill, Harrow, 500 Residential yes no Y School HA1 1UJ Cannon Lane, Pinner, HA5 Moriah Jewish Day School 150 UPDATE Residential no 2005/6 Y 1JF To develop Newton Farm First and Middle Ravenswood Crescent, 270 with Cycle Residential yes no Y School , HA2 9JU parking facility Welldon Crescent, Harrow, Norbury First and Middle School 380 Residential CPZ no Y HA1 1QQ

Pinner Park First School 370 To develop As part of Melbourne Avenue, Pinner, with SRtS main road SRtS no 2004/5 Y HA5 5TL Pinner Park Middle School 360 study process

Pinner Wood First School 260 To develop Latimer Gardens, Pinner, from SRtS Residential yes no 2003/4 Y HA5 3RA Pinner Wood Middle School 330 study

Draft

School Programm Pupil School Travel 20mph Parking School name Address Traffic Safety ed for numbers Plan zone problems? Zone SRtS Priestmead First School 380 Hartford Avenue, Kenton, To develop with Residential yes no 2005/6 Y HA3 8SZ SRtS study Priestmead Middle School 380

Roxbourne First School 370 Torbay Road, Harrow, HA2 Residential yes no Y 9QF Middle School 320

Byron Hill Road, Harrow, First and Middle School 460 Residential no no Y HA2 0JA

Roxeth Manor First School 340 Eastcote Lane. South In discussion Main road yes no 2001/2 Y Harrow, HA2 9AG with schools Roxeth Manor Middle School 340

St Anselm's RC First and Middle Roxborough Park, Harrow 420 Walking Bus Residential no no Y School on the Hill, HA1 3BE St Bernadette's RC First and Clifton Road, Kenton, HA3 In discussion 430 Residential no no Y Middle School 9NS with schools St George's RC First and Middle , Harrow, HA1 450 Main road no no Y School 3SB St. John Fisher RC First and Melrose Road, Pinner, HA5 360 Update old plan Residential no no 2005/6 Y Middle School 5RA Embry Way, Stanmore, St John's C of E First School 250 Residential no no Y HA7 3AZ Green Lane, Stanmore, St John's C of E Middle School 240 main road no no Y HA7 3AD St Joseph's RC First and Middle Dobbin Close, Harrow, HA3 440 Residential yes no 2007/8 Y School 7LP St Teresa's RC First and Middle Long Elmes, , 440 Main road no no Y School HA3 6LE

Draft

School Programm Pupil School Travel 20mph Parking School name Address Traffic Safety ed for numbers Plan zone problems? Zone SRtS

Stag Lane First School 330 Collier Drive, Edgware, HA8 In discussion Residential no no 2006/7 Y 5RU Stag Lane Middle School 310

Stanburn First School 370 To develop Abercorn Road, Stanmore, from SRTS Main road yes no 2002/3 Y HA7 2PJ Stanburn Middle School 370 study

Vaughan First and Middle Vaughan Road, West 500 SRTS Residential CPZ 2003/4 2003 Y School Harrow, HA1 4EL

Weald First School 310 Robin Hood Drive, Harrow In discussion Residential yes no Y Weald, HA3 7DH Weald Middle School 350 Kingsley Road, South Welldon Park First School Harrow, 200 Residential yes no HA2 8LT Y Wyvenhoe Road, South Cycle parking Welldon Park Middle School Harrow, 230 facility HA2 8LS

West Lodge First School 370 To develop West End Lane, Pinner, from SRTS Main road yes 2004/5 2004/5 Y HA5 1AF West Lodge Middle School 330 study

Whitchurch First School 370 Wemborough Road, Main road no no Y Stanmore, HA7 2EQ Whitchurch Middle School 350

Whitefriars First and Middle Whitefriars Avenue, 420 Residential yes no Y School , HA3 5RQ Woodlands First & Middle Whittlesea Road, Harrow N/A - school 40 Residential no no School - Special Needs School Weald, HA3 6ND transport

Draft

School Programm HIGH SCHOOLS Pupil School Travel 20mph Parking Address Traffic Safety ed for (12 – 16 age group) numbers Plan zone problems? Zone SRtS Bridges Road, Stanmore, Residentialno no Y HA7 3NA Shaldon Road, Edgware, 730 Residential no no HA8 6AN Gayton Road, Harrow, HA1 720 Cycle parking Main road no no 2JG Headstone Lane, Harrow, Cycle parking Main road no no HA3 6NR George V Avenue, Pinner, 1200 Cycle parking Main road no no HA5 5RP Thistlecroft Avenue, Park High School 1120 Residential no no Stanmore, HA7 1PL Eastcote Lane. South Rooks Heath High School 900 Main road no no Harrow, HA2 9AG High Road, Harrow Weald, Main road no no HA2 0AD High Street, Wealdstone, Sacred Heart High School Main road no no HA3 7AY Porlock Avenue, Harrow, Main road no no HA2 0AD Whittlesea Road Harrow Kingsley High School - Special Weald, 40 Residential no no Needs School HA3 6ND Shaftesbury High School - Headstone Lane, Harrow, Main road no no Special Needs School HA3 6LE Mount Park Avenue, Harrow St. Dominics 6th Form College on the Hill, 800 Main road no no HA1 3HX

Draft

School Programm Pupil School Travel 20mph Parking PRIVATE SCHOOLS Address Traffic Safety ed for numbers Plan zone problems? Zone SRtS Hindes Road, 209 (4- Alpha Preparatory School Residential Harrow 11) Hindes Road, 167 (11- Buckingham College School Residential Harrow 18) , 130 (4- Buckingham College School Main road Pinner 11) Rayners Lane, Pinner Day Nursery 27 (2-5) Main road Pinner 797 (13- Main road 18) To develop with Beaulieu Gardens, 632 (3- Heathfield School Cannon Lane Residential 2005/6 Pinner 18) School Love Lane, Innellan House School 70 (3-7) Residential Pinner Middle Road, 560 (11- In discussion Residential Harrow on the Hill 18) Canons Drive, 1005 (4- North London Collegiate School In discussion Residential Edgware 18) Orley Farm Road, 476 (4- Residential Harrow on the Hill 13) Peterborough and St. Margarets Common Road, 228 (4- Main road School Bushey Heath 16) Hindes Road, 226 (4- Quainton Hall School Residential Harrow 13) Marsh Road, 325 (3- Reddiford School Pinner 11) Middle Road, Roxeth Mead School 53 (3-7) Residential Harrow on the Hill

Draft