DOCSLIB.ORG

Construction Materials Transporting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Construction Materials Transporting Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized SFG2806 V1 Executive Summary Introduction The Environmental and Social Impacts Assessment (ESIA) report is prepared for 13km long segment 2 Batil – Gersheen of Road No. 2 in Kurdistan. The Report follows the Terms of Reference for the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) and Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for segments 2 and 3 of Road No. 2 in Kurdistan issued by the General Directorate of Roads and Bridges (GDRB) of Duhok. The main goal of the study is to provide the decision-makers with a comprehensive tool that will allow them to implement the road upgrading in a way that is the least detrimental to the environment, population and businesses in the vicinity of the road alignment. Project Description Segment 2: Batil – Gersheen, 13km long (comprising 8km as part of TC and 5km connecting TC to Gersheen tunnel) is proposed to be upgraded from 1 lane both directions (single carriageway) to 3 lanes both directions (dual carriageway). Segment 2 is a part of the 65km KRG Transport Corridor (KRG TC). The project is located in Duhok Governorate of the Northern autonomous region of Iraq – Kurdistan. The Duhok Governorate is the most northern district of Kurdistan and borders with Turkey from the North and Syria from the West. The TC is connecting the city of Duhok with the Ibrahim Al Khalil border with Turkey. The map of the TC with Segment 2 highlighted in blue on it is presented in the Figure 0-1. Segment 2 Figure 0-1: Segment 2: Batil - Gersheen 1 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report For Transport Corridor Project – Road No. 2 – Segment 2 in Kurdistan The project has been under construction since July 2014. The expected completion date is April 2017. The rate of completion as of October 2015 is 41%. The breakdown of activities completed is presented in Annex 5. Segment 2 of TC comprises expansion of the current road alignment from 1 lane both directions (single carriageway) to 3 lanes both directions (dual carriageway). A Right of Way (ROW) for road construction of 100 m has been adopted for land acquisition and approved by GDRB. The proposed design speed for this road is 100 km/h. The horizontal and vertical alignments of the Road are designed taking into consideration type of terrain, design speed, the proposed cross section and planned Right of Way (ROW). There is a directional interchange Smail Ava Interchange designed to a high standard allowing fast interchange in each direction. Sixteen box drainage culverts are provided at low points generally defined by shallow wadis. Three road underpasses are provided for livestock and wild animals crossing. Truck lay-bys are proposed on each direction of the road. The road will be furnished with the road signs (directional, warning, etc.), lighting, guardrail, Jersey barriers, and road markings. Materials used for road construction include soils (possible re-use of cut materials), aggregates, Portland cement mixes, asphalt mixes, geo-synthetics, composites, and metals including steel and aluminum, wood materials. Significant water consumption is anticipated for the project. The staffing requirements for the project implementation are estimated about 90 persons including the administrative, technical staff, construction crew and miscellaneous unskilled labor. The summary of the road construction activities is presented in Table 0-1: Table 0-1: Duration of Construction Activities Duration (man # Activity days) 1 Construction of temporary detour routes: from station 22+100 to station 22+700 from station17+000 to station 18+000 from station 22+100 to station 22+700 from station 22+700 to station 28+100 1.1 Clearance and surveying 15 1.2 Cut and fill works 15 1.3 Curbstone works 22 1.4 Aggregate sub-layer 36 1.5 Paving 17 1.6 Traffic signs installation 5 2 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report For Transport Corridor Project – Road No. 2 – Segment 2 in Kurdistan Duration (man # Activity days) 1.7 Setting up construction camp 10 2 Main road works 2.1 Clearance 55 2.2 Cut/excavation 75 2.3 Fill operations 85 2.4 Curbstone works 70 2.5 Base sub-layer 80 2.6 Base layer 50 2.7 Tiling 50 2.8 Bridges and culverts works 170 2.9 Utilities installation 80 2.10 Installing reinforced concrete structures 130 2.11 Installing road lighting equipment 90 2.12 Paving 60 2.13 Installation of guardrails and barriers 60 2.14 Traffic signs installation and road markings 30 The project has been under construction since July 2014. The works completion rate as of 25.10.2015 was 41%. Policy, Legal and Institutional Framework The desk study on legal and institutional framework was conducted in order to assess the relevant existing legislation, policies and role of the different institutions in the project. The most applicable World Bank safeguard policies were also assessed and compared to the national legislation. Policies and Strategies: National Development Plan of Iraq 2011 -2014 Kurdistan Regional Government’s Economic Development Strategy Iraqi Transport Master Plan Legal National Framework: The Law for the Protection and Improvement of Environment No. 27, 2009 The Forestry Law No. 30, 2009 The Law on the Protection of Wild Animals and Birds No. 17, 2010 Public Health Law No. 89, 1981 The Law of Antiquities and Heritage No. 55, 2002 3 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report For Transport Corridor Project – Road No. 2 – Segment 2 in Kurdistan Regulation for the Provision of Water Resources, No. 2, 2001 Law of Environmental Protection and Improvement in Iraqi Kurdistan Region No.8, 2008 Law on Public Roads No. 35, 2002 Law of Land Acquisition No. 12, 1981 According to the World Bank definition the project is categorized as Category A. The policies that are viewed as most relevant to the scope of the present study are: Environmental Assessment (OP/BP 4.01) Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12) OP/BP 4.11 – Physical Cultural Resources BP 17.50 Disclosure Policies Institutional and Administrative Framework The role of environmental protection is divided between different governmental institutions, which are responsible for specific aspects of environmental management. Also, some NGOs and scientific centers and universities are contributing to the nature protection in the Kurdistan Region. The Ministry of Natural Resources of the Kurdistan Regional Government; Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources; Ministry of Environment/Environmental Protection and Improvement Board is the major governmental agency responsible for environmental conservation and protection. Ministry of Construction and Housing; Ministry of Municipalities and Tourism/Archeological Directorate of Duhok; Municipalities; NGO - Farasheen Organization for Environmental Protection (FOEP); Duhok Farmers Union; University of Dohuk. A number of international donor organizations are active in the Kurdistan Region and are implementing projects designed to improve the livelihoods of the population. Despite the fact that quite a number of institutions are involved in environmental protection and conservation, the institutional framework of the Kurdistan Region is characterized with a number of deficiencies: Dispersion of authorities and low level of coordination between different institutions; Overlap of jurisdiction, which might lead to overlooking the significant issues; Lengthy and bureaucratic process of obtaining permits for different kind of activities. 4 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report For Transport Corridor Project – Road No. 2 – Segment 2 in Kurdistan As authorized by KRG, DGRB bears primary official responsibility for ensuring that land acquisition and resettlement associated with the new road alignment are planned and implemented in a manner consistent with the laws and regulations of Kurdistan Region, and in a manner consistent with the principles and procedures of World Bank OP 4.12. Effective implementation of resettlement program requires coordination with the Duhok governorate along with their subordinate district governments, and with local councils and village committees functioning at the village or settlement level. Public Consultation Public participation makes a positive contribution to the project in terms of minimizing and avoiding potential public controversy and in identification of priorities of assessment. Stakeholders’ identification and analysis was conducted according to the World Bank categorization of the stakeholders according to their interest and influence in the present study. The key stakeholders identified include: GDRB Directorate of Agriculture of Duhok Directorate of Water of Duhok Directorate of Antiquities of Duhok Farmers’ Association of Duhok Directorate for Environmental Protection and Improvement Board of Duhok Local administration Farmers Business entities Duhok University Zakho University Al Farasheen Environmental NGO Public awareness was achieved through: Consultation Session on July 17, 2013 attended by 40 participants; Consultations with PAPs; Interviews with the governmental officials; Negotiations of Compensation Committee with individual PAPs on the size of the land acquisition and proposed compensation. Based on the main issues of concern expressed by the stakeholders throughout the consultations the criteria and requirements for project acceptance are described in Chapter 5.6. 5 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report For Transport Corridor Project – Road No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Politics of Security in Ninewa: Preventing an ISIS Resurgence in Northern Iraq
    The Politics of Security in Ninewa: Preventing an ISIS Resurgence in Northern Iraq Julie Ahn—Maeve Campbell—Pete Knoetgen Client: Office of Iraq Affairs, U.S. Department of State Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Advisor: Meghan O’Sullivan Policy Analysis Exercise Seminar Leader: Matthew Bunn May 7, 2018 This Policy Analysis Exercise reflects the views of the authors and should not be viewed as representing the views of the US Government, nor those of Harvard University or any of its faculty. Acknowledgements We would like to express our gratitude to the many people who helped us throughout the development, research, and drafting of this report. Our field work in Iraq would not have been possible without the help of Sherzad Khidhir. His willingness to connect us with in-country stakeholders significantly contributed to the breadth of our interviews. Those interviews were made possible by our fantastic translators, Lezan, Ehsan, and Younis, who ensured that we could capture critical information and the nuance of discussions. We also greatly appreciated the willingness of U.S. State Department officials, the soldiers of Operation Inherent Resolve, and our many other interview participants to provide us with their time and insights. Thanks to their assistance, we were able to gain a better grasp of this immensely complex topic. Throughout our research, we benefitted from consultations with numerous Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) faculty, as well as with individuals from the larger Harvard community. We would especially like to thank Harvard Business School Professor Kristin Fabbe and Razzaq al-Saiedi from the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative who both provided critical support to our project.
    [Show full text]
  • Wash Needs in Schools Iraq
    COMPARATIVE OVERVIEW WASH NEEDS IN SCHOOLS OF KEY INDICATORS Note: Findings derived from WFP data are December 2019 IRAQ presented in turquoise boxes. Methodology Water Hygiene Sanitation 1 3 2 REACH Number of HH surveys conducted by Number of schools assessed by WFP Drinking water from a water source is available Drinking water from a water source is available Drinking water comes from an improved water source The water quality is perceived to be acceptable The main water source is at the school's premises Has access to handwashing facilities Has access to handwashing facilities of which is having water and soap available of which is functional of which is having soap Has access to improved sanitation facilities number of Average functional student toilets per school building number of toilets Average for students number of Average students per toilet Has access to student toilets separated by gender Has access to student toilets separated by gender Has unusable toilets Is having a good structural condition of student toilets Is having a good hygienic condition of student toilets Al-Falluja 115 88% 100% 78% 93% 100% 97% 100% 9,1 82% 0% Al-Ramadi 80 83% 98% 81% 98% 100% 100% 100% 8,6 93% 0% Al-Anbar Ana 74 31 44% 65% 87% 49% 72% 94% 94% 64% 66% 62% 94% 5,8 5,4 36 90% 90% 23% 100% 71% Heet 87 72% 100% 60% 100% 93% 97% 100% 9,0 88% 0% Shat Al-Arab 98 12% 92% 83% 11% 7,2 91 77% 56% 46% Al-Basrah Al-Khidhir 70 50% 66% 76% 11% 5,8 69 79% 74% 32% Al-Muthanna Al-Kufa 120 21% 46% 71% 99% 100% 23% 99% 6.5 71% 27% Al-Najaf Al-Najaf 94 2% 95% 98%
    [Show full text]
  • Assyrians: Indigenous People in Distress
    Home | News | Bet-Nahren, Assyria Indigenous People in Distress by Frederick A. Aprim — activist, author, historian. | profile | writings | website Posted: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 at 11:05 AM UT | Printed: April 04, 2003 | Updated: August 24, 2018 Contents Indigenous People in Distress Preface Introduction Section 1: Iraq Section 2: Turkey Section 3: Syria Conclusion Appendix 1: Churches Destroyed by the Ba'ath Regime in Iraq Appendix 2: Assyrian Villages Destroyed by the Ba'ath Regime in Iraq Assyrian Villages and Monasteries PREFACE Throughout the media coverage of Operation Iraqi Freedom, the emphasis continues to be predominantly on the oppression of the Iraqi Ba'ath regime against the Shi'aa Arabs and Kurds. The Indigenous People in Distress world, despite to a very limited cases, have Edited by Fred Aprim | PDF continued to neglect the suffering of the Assyrians, the indigenous people of Iraq. Details: Paperback, 91 pages, in English Dimensions: 8.5" x 5.5" (in inches) When the thought for an urgent need for the publication of a booklet about the suffering ISBN: 0974445061 of the Assyrians came about, I was given the Publisher: Assyrian Academic Society opportunity and responsibility of gathering Published date: September, 2003 information and putting it together. In doing so, I used material from many trustworthy Assyrian web sites such as www.aina.org (AINA), www.atour.com (Atour), and www.zindamagazine.com (Zinda). Other resources were information I have gathered throughout the years and are part of my upcoming book. I hope that this humble work will give the reader a general idea about the Assyrians.
    [Show full text]
  • IRAQ, YEAR 2020: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 25 March 2021
    IRAQ, YEAR 2020: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 25 March 2021 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, 6 May 2018b; administrative divisions: GADM, 6 May 2018a; incid- ent data: ACLED, 12 March 2021; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 IRAQ, YEAR 2020: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 25 MARCH 2021 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Protests 1795 13 36 Conflict incidents by category 2 Explosions / Remote 1761 308 824 Development of conflict incidents from 2016 to 2020 2 violence Battles 869 502 1461 Methodology 3 Strategic developments 580 7 11 Conflict incidents per province 4 Riots 441 40 68 Violence against civilians 408 239 315 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 5854 1109 2715 Disclaimer 7 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 12 March 2021). Development of conflict incidents from 2016 to 2020 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 12 March 2021). 2 IRAQ, YEAR 2020: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 25 MARCH 2021 Methodology on what level of detail is reported. Thus, towns may represent the wider region in which an incident occured, or the provincial capital may be used if only the province The data used in this report was collected by the Armed Conflict Location & Event is known.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurdistan Rising? Considerations for Kurds, Their Neighbors, and the Region
    KURDISTAN RISING? CONSIDERATIONS FOR KURDS, THEIR NEIGHBORS, AND THE REGION Michael Rubin AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE Kurdistan Rising? Considerations for Kurds, Their Neighbors, and the Region Michael Rubin June 2016 American Enterprise Institute © 2016 by the American Enterprise Institute. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or reproduced in any man- ner whatsoever without permission in writing from the American Enterprise Institute except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. The views expressed in the publications of the American Enterprise Institute are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, advisory panels, officers, or trustees of AEI. American Enterprise Institute 1150 17th St. NW Washington, DC 20036 www.aei.org. Cover image: Grand Millennium Sualimani Hotel in Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan, by Diyar Muhammed, Wikimedia Commons, Creative Commons. Contents Executive Summary 1 1. Who Are the Kurds? 5 2. Is This Kurdistan’s Moment? 19 3. What Do the Kurds Want? 27 4. What Form of Government Will Kurdistan Embrace? 56 5. Would Kurdistan Have a Viable Economy? 64 6. Would Kurdistan Be a State of Law? 91 7. What Services Would Kurdistan Provide Its Citizens? 101 8. Could Kurdistan Defend Itself Militarily and Diplomatically? 107 9. Does the United States Have a Coherent Kurdistan Policy? 119 Notes 125 Acknowledgments 137 About the Author 139 iii Executive Summary wo decades ago, most US officials would have been hard-pressed Tto place Kurdistan on a map, let alone consider Kurds as allies. Today, Kurds have largely won over Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurdish Oppression Against Assyrians
    Oppression, Assassination, Torture, Harassment, Unfair, and Undemocratic Acts by Kurds and Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) Against the Assyrians (also known as Chaldeans and Suryan) in North of Iraq. Compiled by Fred Aprim (ZINDA) After the 1991 uprising, Assyrians had good working relations with the various political groups in North Iraq. All the same, elections in the spring of 1992 would be a harbinger of problems to come - ultra-nationalists among some Kurdish parties tried and succeeded in exerting their influence over any Assyrian involvement in North Iraqi politics by creating a puppet "Christian Kurdish" party linked to the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP), the so-called United Kurdistan Christians (UKC). (http://www.zindamagazine.com/html/archives/2002/6.3.02/index.php#ZindaSays) (ATOUR) In 1992 some intellectual Assyrians published a communiqué, in it they warned against the continuous process of the Kurdification of the Iraqi people in north of Iraq. Then the ethnic and linguistic map of northern Iraq was not as it is today; some ten years after the no-fly zone has been established. For its importance, here is a passage from that communiqué: “The Kurdish leadership, and in a well-planned program, had begun to settle Kurds and in large numbers around Assyrian regions like Sarsank, Barwari Bala and others. This Kurdish housing project was naturally to change the demographic, economic, and civic structure of the Christian regions in only few short years; a process that forced the Christian to emigrate as the vacant homes were overtaken by the Kurds.” (http://www.atour.com/news/assyria/20030617a.html) (ATOUR) Francis Yusuf Shabo: born 1951 in Mangesh (Duhok Province), married with four children.
    [Show full text]
  • 20141214 04 IOM DTM Repor
    TURKEY Zakho Amedi Total Families: 27,209 TURKEY Zakho Amedi TURKEY Total Families: 113,999 DAHUK Mergasur DAHUK Mergasur Dahuk Sumel 1 Sumel Dahuk 1 Soran Individual : 163,254 Soran Individuals : 683,994 DTM Al-Shikhan Akre Al-Shikhan Akre Tel afar Choman Telafar Choman Tilkaif Tilkaif Shaqlawa Shaqlawa Al-Hamdaniya Rania Al-Hamdaniya Rania Sinjar Pshdar Sinjar Pshdar ERBIL ERBIL DASHBOARD Erbil Erbil Mosul Koisnjaq Mosul Koisnjaq NINEWA Dokan NINEWA Dokan Makhmur Sharbazher Penjwin Makhmur Sharbazher Penjwin Dabes Dabes IRAQ IDP CRISIS Al-Ba'aj SULAYMANIYAH Al-Ba'aj SULAYMANIYAH Hatra Al-Shirqat Kirkuk Hatra Al-Shirqat Kirkuk Sulaymaniya Sulaymaniya KIRKUK KIRKUK Al-Hawiga Chamchamal Al-Hawiga Chamchamal DarbandihkanHalabja SYRIA Darbandihkan SYRIA Daquq Daquq Halabja SHELTER GROUP Kalar Kalar Baiji Baiji Tooz Tooz BY DISPLACEMENT FLOW Ra'ua Tikrit SYRIA Ra'ua Tikrit Kifri Kifri January to December 9, 2014 SALAH AL-DIN Haditha Haditha SALAH AL-DIN Samarra Al-Daur Khanaqin Samarra Al-Daur Khanaqin Al-Ka'im Al-Ka'im Al-Thethar Al-Khalis Al-Thethar Al-Khalis % OF FAMILIES BY SHELTER TYPE AS OF: DIYALA DIYALA Ana Balad Ana Balad IRAN Al-Muqdadiya IRAN Al-Muqdadiya IRAN Heet Al-Fares Heet Al-Fares Tar m ia Tarm ia Ba'quba Ba'quba Adhamia Baladrooz Adhamia Baladrooz Kadhimia Kadhimia JANUARY TO MAY CRISIS KarkhAl Resafa Ramadi Ramadi KarkhAl Resafa 1 Abu Ghraib Abu Ghraib BAGHDADMada'in BAGHDADMada'in ANBAR Falluja ANBAR Falluja Mahmoudiya Mahmoudiya Badra Badra 2% 1% Al-Azezia Al-Azezia Al-Suwaira Al-Suwaira Al-Musayab Al-Musayab 21% Al-Mahawil
    [Show full text]
  • Mosul Response Dashboard 20 Aug 2017
    UNHCR Mosul Emergency Response Since October 2016 23 August 2017 UNHCR Co-coordinated Clusters: 1,089,564 displaced since 17 October 2016 Camp/Site Plots Tents Complete + of whom 838,608 are NFI Kits WƌŽƚĞĐƟŽŶ ƐƟůůĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJĚŝƐƉůĂĐĞĚ & ;ŽͲĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞĚďLJhE,ZΘZͿ Targets:44,000 60,000 87,500 ƐƐŝƐƚĞĚďLJhE,Z KĐĐƵƉŝĞĚ DistribƵted 8,931 10,586 SŚĞůƚĞƌΘE&/ 8,931 3,360 (Co-coordinated ďLJhE,ZΘEZͿ 454,098 144,703 20,576 16,849 ( 17,294 16,398 ŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƐ ŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƐ Developed Plots Available assisted assisted Camp ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƟŽŶΘ 34,671 73,554 ĂŵƉDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ in camps ŽƵƚŽĨĐĂŵƉƐ 6,187 34,220 /ŶĐůƵĚĞƐĐŽŶŇŝĐƚͲĂīĞĐƚĞĚ EĞǁƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ EĞǁƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ! ;ŽͲĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞĚďLJhE,ZΘ/KDͿ ƉŽƉƵůĂƟŽŶǁŚŽǁĞƌĞ ŶĞǀĞƌĚŝƐƉůĂĐĞĚ in 2017 in 2017 Derkar dhZ<z Batifa 20km UNHCR Protection Monitoring for Mosul Response Zakho Amadiya Amedi Soran Mergasur Dahuk Ü 47,478 HHs Assessed Sumel Dahuk ^zZ/EZ 212,978 IndividƵals ZWh>/ DAHUK Akre Choman Mosul Dam Lake Shikhan Soran Choman Amalla ISLADIC Mosul Dam Nargizlia 1 B Nargizlia 2 ZEPUBLIC Tilkaif B Telafar Zelikan (n(new) OF IZAN QaymawaQ (Zelikan) B Shaqlawa 58,954 60,881 48,170 44,973 NINEWA HamdaniyaHdHamdaddaa iyaiyyay Al Hol HasanshamHaasasanshams U2 campp MosulMosuMosMooosssuulul HasanshamHasansham U3 Rania BartellaBartelllalaB B Pshdar Mosul BBBHhM2Hasanshamaanshnnssh M2 KhazerKhazehaha M1 Plots in UNHCR Constructed Camps Sinjar BChamakorChamakor As Salamiyah S y Erbil Hammamammama Al-AlilAlil 2 Al Salamiyah 2 DUKAN Occupied Plots Developed Plots Undeveloped Plots BB B RESERVOIR HammamHammH AAlAl-Alil Alil Erbil B Al ^alamiyaŚ
    [Show full text]
  • Ninewa Governorate Profile March 2009
    Ninewa Governorate Profile March 2009 Overview Located in northern Iraq and bordering on Syria, Ninewa is Iraq’s third largest and second most populated governorate. The capital Mosul is Iraq’s third largest city. Sinjar, Telafar, Tilkaif, Al-Shikhan and Akre dis- tricts all have disputed boundaries with Dahuk. Al-Hamdaniya district has a disputed boundary with Erbil. Security worsened during the second half of 2008, with ethnic ten- sions leading to the displacement of 13,000 Christians from Mosul to surrounding areas. Although most of these families have returned and violence has decreased, the situation remains tense, particularly in Mosul city. Telafar, Sinjar, Al-Ba’aj and Hatra districts have among the worst rates of connection to the general water network in Iraq. All districts apart from Hatra have prolonged power cuts or are not connected to the general electricity network. Poverty is a significant problem in all districts except Al-Ba’aj. Demographics Governorate Capital: Mosul Area: 37,323 sq km (8.6% of Iraq) Population: 2,811,091 (9% of total) IDPs & Returnees Source: WFP VAM (2007) Number4156/2#78#*+,-#93:#./0123//-#;3#4;3/<9# of IDPs and Returnees per 1000 of Gender Distribution: Male: 50% Female: 50% Geographical Distribution: Rural: 39% Urban: 61% the population in Ninewa and Iraq Source: GoI COSIT (est. for 2007) Population by district: &'&!# ./0123//-# Al-Mosul 1,620,259 Telafar 382,050 "# Al-Hamdaniya 143,462 Al-Shikhan 49,396 Tilkaif 190,403 Al-Hatre 55,157 Sinjar 237,073 Al-Baaj 133,291 Source: WFP VAM (2007)* $%#
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq-P131550-ESIA-KRG-North-South
    Executive Summary Introduction The Environmental and Social Impacts Assessment (ESIA) report is prepared for 13km long segment 2 Batil – Gersheen of Road No. 2 in Kurdistan. The Report follows the Terms of Reference for the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) and Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for segments 2 and 3 of Road No. 2 in Kurdistan issued by the General Directorate of Roads and Bridges (GDRB) of Duhok. The main goal of the study is to provide the decision-makers with a comprehensive tool that will allow them to implement the road upgrading in a way that is the least detrimental to the environment, population and businesses in the vicinity of the road alignment. Project Description Segment 2: Batil – Gersheen, 13km long (comprising 8km as part of TC and 5km connecting TC to Gersheen tunnel) is proposed to be upgraded from 1 lane both directions (single carriageway) to 3 lanes both directions (dual carriageway). Segment 2 is a part of the 65km KRG Transport Corridor (KRG TC). The project is located in Duhok Governorate of the Northern autonomous region of Iraq – Kurdistan. The Duhok Governorate is the most northern district of Kurdistan and borders with Turkey from the North and Syria from the West. The TC is connecting the city of Duhok with the Ibrahim Al Khalil border with Turkey. The map of the TC with Segment 2 highlighted in blue on it is presented in the Figure 0-1. Segment 2 Figure 0-1: Segment 2: Batil - Gersheen 1 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report For Transport Corridor Project – Road No.
    [Show full text]
  • Year of the Sword
    YEAR OF THE SWORD JOSEPH YACOUB Year of the Sword The Assyrian Christian Genocide, A History Translated by James Ferguson A A Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries. Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 Copyright © Joseph Yacoub 2016 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above. You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available Joseph Yacoub.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Factors Associated with Brucella Seropositivity in Sheep and Goats in Duhok Province, Iraq
    veterinary sciences Article Risk Factors Associated with Brucella Seropositivity in Sheep and Goats in Duhok Province, Iraq Ali. G. Alhamada 1,2,† ID , Ihab Habib 1,3,*,† ID , Anne Barnes 1 and Ian Robertson 1,4 1 College of Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth 6150, Australia; [email protected] (A.G.A); [email protected] (A.B); [email protected] (I.R) 2 College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul, Mosul 41002, Iraq 3 High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21516, Egypt 4 China-Australia Joint Research and Training Center for Veterinary Epidemiology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430072, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-8-9360-2434 † These authors contributed equally to this work. Academic Editors: Chrissanthy Papadopoulou, Vangelis Economou and Hercules Sakkas Received: 23 October 2017; Accepted: 5 December 2017; Published: 7 December 2017 Abstract: Sera from 432 small ruminants (335 sheep and 97 goats) from 72 farms in Duhok Province, northern Iraq, were collected to investigate risk factors associated with brucellosis seropositivity. Serum samples were tested using the Rose Bengal test (RBT) and an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA). Using parallel interpretation, RBT and iELISA results showed that 31.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 26.1, 36.3) of sheep and 34.0% (95% CI: 24.7, 44.3) of goats had antibodies against Brucella in the study area. A random-effects multivariable logistic regression model indicated that a higher chance of being seropositive (odds ratio (OR) = 1.7; 95% 1.4; 2.2) was associated with an increase in the age of animals.
    [Show full text]