Creating Job Opportunities for Young Adults in Kurdistan Iraq Funded by Rdpp Written by Nahed Freij

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Creating Job Opportunities for Young Adults in Kurdistan Iraq Funded by Rdpp Written by Nahed Freij FINAL INDEPENDENT EVALUATION SEPTEMBER 2018 CREATING JOB OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUNG ADULTS IN KURDISTAN IRAQ FUNDED BY RDPP WRITTEN BY NAHED FREIJ This report was commissioned by Action Against Hunger. The comments contained herein reflect the opinions of the evaluators only. Evaluation Report for the Independent Final Evaluation of: CREATING JOB OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUNG ADULTS IN KURDISTAN Submitted to: Action Against Hunger Prepared by: Nahed Freij- Sr. Consultant September 2018 1 Summary Table Project Name Creating job opportunities for young adults in Kurdistan Contract Number DANIDA/RDPP/2.1.2/2016-29370 Partners (if applicable) N/A Location (country/ies, region/s) Zakho district, Dohuk Governorate, Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI) Sector(s) Livelihood/Income Generating Activities Duration 14 months, NCE-17 months Starting Date 01 May 2017 Ending Date 30, Sept 2018 Project Language English Donor and Contribution/s RDPP – Regional Development and Protection Programme Country Office administering Action Against Hunger - Kurdistan Region of Iraq the Programme/Project Responsible Action Against Action Against Hunger France Hunger HQ Evaluation Type Independent Final Evaluation Evaluation Dates From July 26 to September 6, 2018 2 Acknowledgements This final evaluation report of “CREATING JOB OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUNG ADULTS IN KURDISTAN” was prepared in my capacity as external evaluator to Action Against Hunger. The evaluation was carried out between July 26 and September 6, 2018. The main findings and recommendations contained in this report include the inputs provided by the interviewed project stakeholders who made sincere efforts and demonstrated willingness and openness to being interviewed for the evaluation and sharing of necessary documentation. From Action Against Hunger Coordination team in Erbil, special thanks go out to Ms. Valeria BACCI Deputy Country Director – Programmes, Mr. Ashok Kumar FSL Head of department, and Ms. Soraya MEAL Officer for their overall guidance and support and for their openness in being interviewed for this evaluation. Special thanks are further extended to Mr. Vincenzo Schiano Lomoriello RDPP Program Manager for Iraq and Jordan for his participation in informing the evaluation. I would like to equally acknowledge the generous support received from the Project staff in Duhok; Andrea, Pirjeen, Alhan, Ismael and Midia, I thank you all for your open inputs, outstanding planning and organizing of the field visits, translating when needed, and furnishing of needed documents. Many thanks are also extended to the numerous people listed in (Annex 2) from the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs, Zakho Vocational Training Center, Directorate of Labor and Vocational Training, Chamber of Commerce, apprentice hosting enterprises, young men and women supported by the action as well as their families who all took serious interest in sharing their Project experience with me. I hope that the conclusions, lessons and recommendations presented in this report will be used in view of shared learning and improvement in future similar programming. Nahed Freij Sr. Consultant Advance Consulting Services “This report was commissioned by Action Against Hunger to the external evaluator. The content does not necessarily reflect the point of view/opinion of the organization” 3 List of abbreviations 3RP Regional Refugee & Resilience Plan BRHA Board of Relief and Humanitarian Affairs CBO Community Based Organization CoC Chamber of Commerce DIB Disputed Internal Boundaries DKK Danish Krones DoLVT Directorate of Labor and Vocational Training ELA Evaluation, Learning and Accountability FGD Focus Group Discussion FSL Food Security and Livelihoods GBV Gender Based Violence HC Hosting Community HRP Humanitarian Response Plan IDP Internally Displaced Person ISIL Islamic State in Iraq and Levant KAB Know About your Business KRI Kurdistan Region of Iraq MHCP Mental Health and Care Practices MOLSA Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs MoU Memorandum of Understanding MoA Ministry of Agriculture MTR Mid Term Review M&E Monitoring and Evaluation NCE No Cost Extension OECD/DAC Development Assistance Committee of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development PS Private Sector PSS Psychosocial support services PDM Post Distribution Monitoring RDDP Regional Development and Protection Programme SDC Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation SSI Semi structured in-depth interviews VfM Value for Money VTC Vocational training center ZVTC Zakho vocational training center WASH Water, Sanitation and Hygiene WFP United Nations World Food Program UNDP United Nations Development Program UNHCR United Nation High Commissioner for Refugees 4 CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Background ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Context ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Brief description of the project subject of the evaluation ........................................................................... 9 3. Evaluation Purpose, Scope and Methodology .............................................................................................. 10 3.1 Methodological Approach .......................................................................................................................... 10 3.2 Limitations and considerations .................................................................................................................. 12 4. Findings .......................................................................................................................................................... 13 4.1 Relevance ................................................................................................................................................... 13 4.2 Effectiveness .............................................................................................................................................. 18 4.3 Efficiency .................................................................................................................................................... 27 4.4 Impact ........................................................................................................................................................ 30 4.5 Sustainability .............................................................................................................................................. 33 5. Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................... 34 6. Good Practices and Lessons Learnt ............................................................................................................... 36 6.1 Good Practices ........................................................................................................................................... 36 6.2 Lessons Learnt ............................................................................................................................................ 36 7. Recommendations ......................................................................................................................................... 37 8. Annexes .......................................................................................................................................................... 39 8.1. Evaluation TOR ........................................................................................................................................... 39 8.2. List of people met/ consulted .................................................................................................................... 46 8.3. List of documents reviewed ....................................................................................................................... 46 8.4. Logical framework ...................................................................................................................................... 49 8.5. Good practice template ............................................................................................................................. 52 8.6. Evaluation Criteria Rating Table ................................................................................................................. 53 8.7. Sample Data collection instruments .......................................................................................................... 54 5 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY With 90% funding from the Regional Development and Protection Programme, Action Against Hunger has been implementing a 17-months project titled “Creating Job Opportunities for Young Adults” in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. The 10,806,000 DKK (Danish Krones) project was implemented in Zakho District of Dohuk Governorate. It aims to “improve the economic situation of vulnerable host communities, Internally Displaced Persons, and refugee families through the creation of new businesses. Through key interventions of i) a vocational training in coordination with a local Vocational Training Centre in Zakho district, ii) an apprenticeship job placement programme and iii) business startup support (Startup
Recommended publications
  • Iraq-P131550-ESIA-KRG-North-South
    Executive Summary Introduction The Environmental and Social Impacts Assessment (ESIA) report is prepared for 13km long segment 2 Batil – Gersheen of Road No. 2 in Kurdistan. The Report follows the Terms of Reference for the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) and Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for segments 2 and 3 of Road No. 2 in Kurdistan issued by the General Directorate of Roads and Bridges (GDRB) of Duhok. The main goal of the study is to provide the decision-makers with a comprehensive tool that will allow them to implement the road upgrading in a way that is the least detrimental to the environment, population and businesses in the vicinity of the road alignment. Project Description Segment 2: Batil – Gersheen, 13km long (comprising 8km as part of TC and 5km connecting TC to Gersheen tunnel) is proposed to be upgraded from 1 lane both directions (single carriageway) to 3 lanes both directions (dual carriageway). Segment 2 is a part of the 65km KRG Transport Corridor (KRG TC). The project is located in Duhok Governorate of the Northern autonomous region of Iraq – Kurdistan. The Duhok Governorate is the most northern district of Kurdistan and borders with Turkey from the North and Syria from the West. The TC is connecting the city of Duhok with the Ibrahim Al Khalil border with Turkey. The map of the TC with Segment 2 highlighted in blue on it is presented in the Figure 0-1. Segment 2 Figure 0-1: Segment 2: Batil - Gersheen 1 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report For Transport Corridor Project – Road No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civilian Impact of Turkey's Operation Claw-Lightning
    1 No Return: The Civilian Impact of Turkey’s Operation Claw-Lightning No Return: The Civilian Impact of Turkey’s Operation Claw-Lightning June 2021 Christian Peacemaker Teams - Iraqi Kurdistan [email protected] (+964) (0) 770 291 6487 www.facebook.com/cpt.ik www.cptik.org 2 No Return: The Civilian Impact of Turkey’s Operation Claw-Lightning Table of Contents Summary 4 The Beginning of Operation Claw-Lightning in Kesta Village 5 Chalke Village: Nowhere to Escape 6 Life Under Threat in Hirure Village 6 Turkey’s Operation Strikes East of Kesta 7 Economic and Environmental Impact on Kani Masi Sub-District 8 Operation Claw-Lightning Impacts in Avashin Region 9 Civilian Injuries from Operation Claw-Lightning 9 Conclusion 10 Recommendations 11 Appendix: 12 - Local Context 12 - Map of Turkish Military Control and Expansion in K RI 13 3 No Return: The Civilian Impact of Turkey’s Operation Claw-Lightning Summary This report documents the impact of the Turkish Armed Forces’ (TAF) Operation Claw-Lightning on the civilian population living in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI). Operation Claw-Lightning is a cross-border military operation that Turkey began on April 23, 2021. Turkey claims that the operation targets the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) to eliminate terrorism in the Kurdistan Region. To launch its operation, Turkey has deployed paratroopers across the Turkey-Iraq border to construct military bases in the Kurdistan Region with the accompaniment of aerial and artillery bombardments. As Turkey has constructed these bases, it has further advanced into the Kurdistan Region to establish what Turkey claims is a security zone, spanning along the Turkey-Iraq border.
    [Show full text]
  • (KFW) Funding Facility for Immediate Stabilization Iraq Crisis Response and Resilience Program
    Quarter 3 2018 Report for Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KFW) Funding Facility for Immediate Stabilization Iraq Crisis Response and Resilience Program 17 October 2018 Objective: This quarterly progress report provides an overview of activities funded by KfW under the BMZ Agreements 2017-40-836, 2016-18-644, and 2017-49-944. Agreements 2016-18-644 and 2017-40-836 are joint agreements between UNDP’s Funding Facility for Stabilization (FFS) and the Iraq Crisis Response and Resilience Program (ICRRP) and KfW. The overview enables KfW to ascertain the activities undertaken during the reporting period, issues that may have arisen, and a brief financial summary. Budget Overview: UNDP’s financial management system does not differentiate between agreements based on the donor’s identifiers. As such, the financial information in Annex I provides a costing of each of the completed projects and below provides a general overview. These were manually identified and organized by the agreement number. As per the Financial Arrangements, official UNDP financial reporting is provided only from the Certified Financial Reports which are released every June for the previous calendar year by donor and UNDP project. Further, for those projects that are not yet completed, activity budgets are subject to change. Changes may arise due to variation orders or extensions of projects. Only upon completion of projects and delivery of payments are figures final. Nonetheless, only UNDP Certified Financial Reports comprise official reporting. The following is an informal financial summary for FFIS components of the Agreements: Approx. Total Amount Total Amount Received So far Agreement Committed/Spent (Euro) (USD) (USD) (USD) 201618644 10,500,000 11,432,663 11,432,663 14,559,761.05 201749944 29,300,000 34,551,887 13,270,142 664,636.75 201740836 30,000,000 35,332,617 16,362,028 10,139,000.80 Total 109,800,000 127,774,775 70,100,838 25,363,398.60 FFS Program Context: In response to the crisis in Iraq, the Funding Facility for Immediate Stabilization (FFIS) was established in June 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Materials Transporting
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized SFG2806 V1 Executive Summary Introduction The Environmental and Social Impacts Assessment (ESIA) report is prepared for 13km long segment 2 Batil – Gersheen of Road No. 2 in Kurdistan. The Report follows the Terms of Reference for the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) and Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for segments 2 and 3 of Road No. 2 in Kurdistan issued by the General Directorate of Roads and Bridges (GDRB) of Duhok. The main goal of the study is to provide the decision-makers with a comprehensive tool that will allow them to implement the road upgrading in a way that is the least detrimental to the environment, population and businesses in the vicinity of the road alignment. Project Description Segment 2: Batil – Gersheen, 13km long (comprising 8km as part of TC and 5km connecting TC to Gersheen tunnel) is proposed to be upgraded from 1 lane both directions (single carriageway) to 3 lanes both directions (dual carriageway). Segment 2 is a part of the 65km KRG Transport Corridor (KRG TC). The project is located in Duhok Governorate of the Northern autonomous region of Iraq – Kurdistan. The Duhok Governorate is the most northern district of Kurdistan and borders with Turkey from the North and Syria from the West. The TC is connecting the city of Duhok with the Ibrahim Al Khalil border with Turkey. The map of the TC with Segment 2 highlighted in blue on it is presented in the Figure 0-1. Segment 2 Figure 0-1: Segment 2: Batil - Gersheen 1 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report For Transport Corridor Project – Road No.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf | 553.33 Kb
    No: 0 E- Newsletter January 2010 Foreword Foreword Foreword MRE training courses for Children Siraj Barzani * Ako Aziz Hamad* he fact that the Kurdistan Region of Iraq is the T most heavily mine-contaminated region of Iraq is n August and October watchful eye of Spirit of Soc- the shepherds in those ar- beyond question. I 2009, the directorate cer* coaches. eas. Thus, this kind of activ- An Impact survey funded by the US Department of of Mine Risk Educa- In a similar activity in De- ity is very crucial for those State’s Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement and tion conducted two training cember 2009, another train- families and especially for implemented by Information Management and Mine Ac- courses in two mine af- ing course was conducted their children, most of whom tion Programs (iMMAP) from 2004-2006 brought clearly fected villages (Soraban and for 60 nomadic children are illiterate and deprived to light the massive scale of mine contamination in the Kanilinj) of Erbil governorate in Bna noor location near from having access to media Kurdistan Region as compared with the rest of Iraq. Find- for 120 students between 6 Sreshma village in Khali- channels as they do not have and 15 years of age. Each of ings of the survey were compelling: the number of Sus- fan Sub-District. The nomad any source of electricity. pected Hazardous Areas (SHA) found in Duhok governo- the courses lasted for four families usually live in the days and covered a variety rate of the Kurdistan Region alone was more than SHAs tents and at the beginning of * Director / Directorate of Mine found in all other governorates of Iraq combined outside of subjects such as: “recog- summer they move to moun- Risk Education / IKMAA the Kurdistan Region! And yet, in terms of mine contami- nizing mines and Explosive tainous areas for grazing nation, Duhok ranks third behind Sulaimanyah and Erbil remnants of war, recogniz- their animals.
    [Show full text]
  • SFG2806 V2 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Executive Summary
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized SFG2806 V2 Executive Summary Introduction The Environmental and Social Impacts Assessment (ESIA) report is prepared in accordance with the Terms of Reference for the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) and Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for two segments of Road No. 2 in Kurdistan, Iraq: Batil – Gersheen (Segment 2) and Gersheen – Suhaila (Segment 3) issued by the Duhok General Directorate of Roads and Bridges (GDRB) and pertains to the 23 km stretch of the Segment 3: Gersheen Intersection – Suhaila Intersection. ESIA is a tool that provides the decision-makers with the tool for the construction of the new road alignment in a way that is economically feasible and the least detrimental to the environment and the local population. Project Description Main Project Features Segment 3: Gersheen Interchange – Suhaila Interchange approximately 23 km in length is proposed to be constructed as 3 lanes both directions dual carriageway. Segment 3 is a part of the 65 km KRG Transport Corridor (KRG TC) located in Duhok Governorate of the Northern autonomous region of Iraq – Kurdistan. The Transport Corridor connects the city of Duhok with the Ibrahim Al Khalil border with Turkey. Originally, four alternative alignments of segment 3 were considered (see Figure 0-1). Segment 3 1 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Transport Corridor Project – Road No. 2 – Segment 3 in KRG Figure 0-1: Segment 3: Gersheen - Suhaila However, upon consideration of the number of factors, such as cost estimates, scale of land acquisition of residential areas, location of different facilities (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Christians and Yazidis in Iraq: Current Situation and Prospects
    OTMAR OEHRING CHRISTIANS AND YAZIDIS IN IRAQ: CURRENT SITUATION AND PROSPECTS www.kas.de OTMAR OEHRING CHRISTIANS AND YAZIDIS IN IRAQ: CURRENT SITUATION AND PROSPECTS Published by the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. Cover photo: © Ibrahim Shaba Lallo, Qaraqosh (currently Ashti Camp, Ankawa, Autonomous Region of Kurdistan) Caption of cover photo: Vertically: We work together Horizontally: We are proud Diagonally: We love, we forgive .(nun), stand for Nazara (Christ) ن The three Arabic characters, starting with The black IS flag bears the words: There is no God but Allah Allah Prophet Mohammed Islamic State in Iraq and As-Sham (i.e. Syria) Published by: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. 2017, Sankt Augustin and Berlin, Germany This publication has been licensed under the terms and conditions of Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 Germany (CC BY-SA 3.0 DE), website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/deed.en Design: SWITSCH Kommunikationsdesign, Cologne, Germany Typesetting: workstation, Niederkassel Printed by: Bonifatius GmbH, Paderborn, Germany Printed in Germany Printed with financial support from the German Federal Government ISBN 978-3-95721-351-8 CONTENTS 7 | 1. Introduction 9 | 2. Legal Framework 2.1 International law ............................................................................................... 9 2.2 National law ....................................................................................................10 13 | 3. Reduced scope for non-Muslim minorities after 2003 3.1 Drastic decline in
    [Show full text]
  • Mise En Page 1
    Bull Angl 411 June 2019.qxp_Bull angl n° 401 August 2018 29/11/2019 18:28 Page 1 INSTITUT KURDDE PARIS E Information and liaison bulletin N° 413 AUGUST 2019 Bull Angl 411 June 2019.qxp_Bull angl n° 401 August 2018 29/11/2019 18:28 Page 2 The publication of this Bulletin enjoys a subsidy from the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs & Ministry of Culture This bulletin is issued in French and English Price per issue : France: 6 € — Abroad : 7,5 € Annual subscribtion (12 issues) France : 60 € — Elsewhere : 75 € Monthly review Directeur de la publication : Mohamad HASSAN ISBN 0761 1285 INSTITUT KURDE, 106, rue La Fayette - 75010 PARIS Tel. : 01-48 24 64 64 - Fax : 01-48 24 64 66 www.fikp.org E-mail: bulletin@fikp.org Bull Angl 411 June 2019.qxp_Bull angl n° 401 August 2018 29/11/2019 18:28 Page 1 Information and liaison bulletin Kurdish Institute of Paris Bulletin N° 413 August 2019 • ROJAVA: CAN THE SECURITY ZONE PREVENT A TURKISH INVASION? • TURKEY: ECONOMY IN CRISIS AND GROWING OPPOSITION TO ERDO AN; NEW ATTACKS ON FREEDOM OF INFORMATION • TURKEY: NUMEROUS PROTESTS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY AFTER THE DISMISSAL OF NEW HDP MAYORS • IRAQ: CONTINUING DISAGREEMENTS OVER THE BUDGET; INTENSIFICATION OF JIHADIST ATTACKS • YEZIDI GENOCIDE: 3 AUGUST DESIGNATED AS A “DAY OF REMEMBRANCE” BY THE KURDISTAN PARLIAMENT • JIHADISTS IMPRISONED IN ROJAVA: WESTERN COUNTRIES FLEE THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES • IRAN: CHILLING THREATS FROM THE REGIME TO OPPONENTS, NUMEROUS CONVICTIONS OF KURDISH ACTIVISTS • IN MEMORIAM: DEATH OF ERAFETTIN GÜRBÜZ ROJAVA: CAN THE SECURITY ZONE PREVENT A TURKISH INVASION? n 1st August, the 13th ISIS coalition, had not been invited.
    [Show full text]