And C18 Bonded Phases with Peptide Mixtures Conner Mchale, Chuping Luo, Benjamin P

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

And C18 Bonded Phases with Peptide Mixtures Conner Mchale, Chuping Luo, Benjamin P Comparison of Phenyl- and C18 Bonded Phases with Peptide Mixtures Conner McHale, Chuping Luo, Benjamin P. Libert, William Miles, Mark Haynes, Stephanie Schuster, Joe DeStefano, and Barry Boyes Presented at ISPPP 2017, Philadelphia Advanced Materials Technology, Inc., 3521 Silverside Rd., Wilmington, DE 19810 Overview Comparison with Peptides and Small Molecules Octadecyl‐silane (ODS,C18) columns are one of the most common bonded‐phases Conditions for reversed‐phase separations of protein and peptide mixtures. In many cases, Column: HALO 160Å, 2.7µm, 2.1x100mm Isocratic: 50‐50 ACN‐Water Peptide Sequence Molecular weight (g/mol) pI resolution between two peaks are critical and need to be distinguished from each K’= 1.42 Flow: 0.5 ml/min Detection: 254 nm Gly‐Tyr GY 238.24 5.98 Temperature: 30 ⁰C other. Mobile phases, organic modifiers, and temperature can help with this Phenyl‐Ethyl Injection Volume: 0.4 µl Val‐Tyr‐Val VYV 379.45 5.98 separation however, different bonded phases may be needed to get the desired Sample Tyr–Tyr–Tyr YYY 507.54 5.97 K’= 1.48 1. Uracil (t0) selectivity and resolution. Three Phenyl‐ silane bonded phases were compared to 2. Phenol Methionine Enkephalin YGGFM 573.67 5.98 3. 4‐Chloro‐Nitrobenzene Leucine enkephalin YGGFL 555.63 5.98 the HALO ES‐C18 phase to see if there are any advantages between them. These Phenyl‐Butyl 4. Naphthalene Angiotensin (1–7) Amide DRVYIHP‐NH 898.02 7.37 superficially porous silica particles have a 160Å pore size, ideal for peptides and 2 Angiotensin II DRVYIHPF 1046.19 7.37 polypeptides up to 20 kDa. Each phase has a unique silane bonding that could K’= 2.47 cause different interactions on the stationary phases. This could show differences Angiotensin 1–12 (human) DRVYIHPFHLVI 1508.79 7.52 in selectivity and resolution and potentially give an advantage in the separation. Phenyl‐Hexyl Neurotensin QLYENKPRRPYIL 1672.92 9.94 Melittin GIGAVLKVLTTGLPALISWIKRKRQQ 2846.50 11.85 K’= 3.53 β‐Endorphin YGGFMTSEKSQTPLVTLFKNAIIKNAYKKGE 3465.03 9.05 ES‐C18 Sauvagine XGPPISIDLSLELLRKMIEIEKQEKEKQQAANNRLLLDTI‐NH2 4599.31 5.08 Materials and Methods Bovine Insulin FVNQHLCGSHLVEALYLVCGERGFFYTPKA 5733.49 6.6 Columns of HALO 160Å ES‐C18 and Phenyl phases were produced at Advanced Small molecule testing including neutral compounds shows an increase in Materials Technology, Inc. (Wilmington, DE). SEM images were obtained using a retention as the alkyl chain gets longer, as expected. Zeiss (Jena, Germany) Auriga 60 High Resolution Focused Ion Beam & Scanning Phenyl‐Ethyl Phenyl‐Butyl Peptide Mixture 1 Peak# Ret. Time Width(50%) Tailing F. Resolution(JP) Peak# Ret. Time Width(50%) Tailing F. Resolution(JP) 1 0.745 0.02218 1.3 ‐‐ 1 0.69 0.02028 1.386 ‐‐ Electron Microscope at the University of Delaware (Newark, DE). 2 2.318 0.03185 1.335 34.364 2 1.885 0.03425 1.455 25.866 3 4.056 0.02987 1.235 33.227 3 3.907 0.0324 1.296 35.789 Mobile phase modifiers were obtained from Pierce and Synquest Laboratories. 4 4.711 0.03193 1.23 12.5 4 4.521 0.03387 1.289 10.935 Increase in resolution between critical pairs 5 5.199 0.02932 1.271 9.411 5 5.216 0.03177 1.363 12.5 (TFA/DFA). Acetonitrile was MS grade (JT Baker) and HPLC grade (EMD Millipore). 6 6.789 0.03082 1.119 31.195 6 6.897 0.02997 1.171 32.13 7 8.514 0.02838 1.261 34.375 7 8.641 0.03153 1.422 33.471 Peptides were from Sigma‐Aldrich and AnaSpec. Analytical peptide separations Phenyl‐Hexyl ES‐C18 used the Shimadzu Nexera LC‐30 components (100 µL mixer), with the SPD M30A Phenyl‐Ethyl Peak# Ret. Time Width(50%) Tailing F. Resolution(JP) Peak# Ret. Time Width(50%) Tailing F. Resolution(JP) 1 0.843 0.0235 1.399 ‐‐ 1 1.08 0.02293 1.358 ‐‐ UV detector. An Orbitrap Velos Pro ETD (ThermoScientific, Inc.) was used for MS 2 2.823 0.02868 1.466 44.768 2 3.444 0.0265 1.375 56.437 Phenyl‐Butyl 3 4.569 0.02872 1.332 35.897 3 4.868 0.02745 1.281 31.155 detection. MS was scanned from 300‐2000 m/z; the ESI source was operated at 4 5.238 0.02938 1.349 13.598 4 5.751 0.02905 1.323 18.429 Phenyl‐Hexyl 5 5.595 0.02727 1.359 7.433 5 6.023 0.02637 1.509 5.797 3.5 kV. 6 6.901 0.02923 1.185 27.271 6 7.494 0.03132 1.158 30.092 ES‐C18 7 8.642 0.02963 1.438 34.892 7 9.286 0.02892 1.394 35.103 Conditions Peptide Mixture 1 Column: HALO 160Å, 2.7µm, 2.1x100mm 1. Gly‐Tyr (238.24 g/mol) Mobile Phase: 2. Val‐Tyr‐Val (379.46 g/mol) A: Water/ 0.1% TFA HALO Superficially Porous Particles B: 70‐30 ACN/ Water/ 0.1% TFA 3. Methionine Enkephalin (573.67 g/mol) Resolution between critical pairs also improves with the phenyl‐phases. Certain peptides show different Gradient: 5‐55% B in 10 min. 4. Angiotensin II (1046.20 g/mol) Flow: 0.5 ml/min. 5. Leucine Enkephalin (555.62 g/mol) behaviors on the bonded phases. Especially the Phenyl‐Butyl compared to the Phenyl‐Ethyl. Some Detection: 220 nm 6. Bovine Ribonuclease A (13.7 kDa) Temperature: 60⁰C 7. Bovine Insulin (5733.49 g/mol) peptides are less retained while others are more retained. This could have to do with the different silane Injection Volume: 1.7 µl bondings. (sterically protected vs. tri‐functional) Phenyl‐Ethyl Phenyl‐Butyl Peak# Ret. Time Width(50%) Tailing F. Resolution(USP) Area Peak# Ret. Time Width(50%) Tailing F. Resolution(USP) Area 1 3.365 0.0442 1.255 ‐‐ 416857 1 2.715 0.04488 1.295 ‐‐ 415609 2 3.884 0.05403 1.493 6.257 332155 2 3.362 0.06102 1.644 7.08 330595 Peptide Mixture 2 3 8.533 0.05385 1.6 50.883 293148 3 8.358 0.06278 1.866 46.365 294705 Change in selectivity 4 10.231 0.04725 1.282 19.836 177293 4 10.503 0.05035 1.374 21.975 176731 5 12.661 0.05247 1.5 28.769 346896 5 12.706 0.05883 1.649 23.331 353714 6 14.603 0.052 1.233 21.894 191883 6 14.8 0.05265 1.169 21.882 174198 7 19.194 0.05033 1.311 52.825 188326 7 18.97 0.05493 1.401 45.545 274204 8 19.678 0.0565 1.281 5.34 267025 8 19.463 0.0498 1.363 5.499 199799 Phenyl‐Ethyl Phenyl‐Hexyl ES‐C18 Peak# Ret. Time Width(50%) Tailing F. Resolution(USP) Area Peak# Ret. Time Width(50%) Tailing F. Resolution(USP) Area 1 3.807 0.04032 1.413 ‐‐ 416255 1 4.782 0.03792 1.312 ‐‐ 416091 Phenyl‐Butyl 2 4.865 0.04815 1.65 14.032 329522 2 5.864 0.0441 1.652 15.506 332341 Shell with 160 Å pores 3 9.537 0.05288 1.813 53.785 293167 3 10.502 0.05062 1.817 57.207 302774 4 10.949 0.046 1.415 16.811 172364 4 11.981 0.04527 1.395 18.153 178743 Phenyl‐Hexyl 5 13.324 0.05157 1.686 28.689 347167 5 14.499 0.05087 1.67 30.838 345223 6 15.316 0.04855 1.391 23.316 194021 6 16.852 0.05178 1.261 26.901 168743 The HALO 160Å particle is a superficially porous particle made with a 1.7µm solid core 7 19.333 0.04583 1.512 50.291 195403 7 21.346 0.05012 1.583 51.762 197522 ES‐C18 8 20.087 0.05363 1.454 8.93 271712 8 23.292 0.0604 1.481 20.62 281186 and a 0.5µm porous shell. The shell consists of 160Å pores, ideal for peptides and polypeptides up to 20 kDa. These particles show excellent stability and provide lower Conditions Peptide Mixture 2 overall back pressure when compared to totally porous particles. Column: HALO 160Å, 2.7µm, 2.1x100mm 1. Tyr‐Tyr‐Tyr (507.54 g/mol) Mobile Phase: 2. Angiotensin (1‐7) Amide (898.02 g/mol) A: Water/ 0.1% TFA B: 80‐20 ACN/ Water/ 0.085% TFA 3. Angiotensin II (1046.20 g/mol) Another mix of peptides are examined with the different bonded phases. In this case, Gradient: 5‐55% B in 25 min. 4. Angiotensin (1‐12) human (1508.79 g/mol) Flow: 0.5 ml/min. 5. Neurotensin (1672.92 g/mol) resolution between critical pairs decreases. However, the Phenyl‐Butyl phase shows a Detection: 220 nm 6. β‐Endorphin (3465.03 g/mol) Temperature: 60⁰C 7. Sauvagine (4599.31 g/mol) change in selectivity between the last two peptides of the mix. (sauvagine and melittin) Injection Volume: 2 µl 8. Melittin (2846.46 g/mol) This could be very useful in some cases where peak coelution could be an issue. Analysis of a trastuzumab (IgG1) tryptic digest using Mass Spectrometry Conditions Column: HALO 160Å, 2.7µm, 2.1x100mm Mobile Phase: A: Water/ 10 mM DFA B: Acetonitrile/ 10 mM DFA Gradient: 2‐50% B in 60 min. Flow: 0.5 ml/min. Detection: 220 nm Temperature: 60⁰C k = (t1‐ t0)/t0 α = k2/k1 ∆ α= αphenyl – αc18I Trypsin Digest Sample: Reduced and alkylated mAb was digested at 1:30 protein to enzyme for 4hrs in 50 mM Tris‐HCl (pH 7.8)/1.5M Guanidine‐HCl, followed by formic acid acidification and direct injection.
Recommended publications
  • Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Physiology
    European Journal of Endocrinology (2006) 155 S71–S76 ISSN 0804-4643 Corticotropin-releasing hormone physiology Joseph A Majzoub Division of Endocrinology, Children’s Hospital Boston, Thomas Morgan Rotch Professor of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA (Correspondence should be addressed to J A Majzoub; Email: [email protected]) Abstract Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), also known as corticotropin-releasing factor, is a highly conserved peptide hormone comprising 41 amino acid residues. Its name derives from its role in the anterior pituitary, where it mediates the release of corticotropin (ACTH) leading to the release of adrenocortical steroids. CRH is the major hypothalamic activator of the hypothalamic–pituitary– adrenal (HPA)axis. Major functions of the HPAinclude: (i) influencing fetal development of major organ systems including lung, liver, and gut, (ii) metabolic functions, including the maintenance of normal blood glucose levels during the fasting state via glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis, (iii) modulation of immune function, and (iv) maintenance of cardiovascular tone. In addition, CRH, acting both directly and via the HPA, has a role in regulating several neuroendocrine functions including behavior, food intake, reproduction, growth, immune function, and autonomic function. CRH has been localized to the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus, which projects to the median eminence and other hypothalamic and midbrain targets. The CRH gene is composed of two exons. The CRH promoter contains a cAMP-response element, and the intron contains a restrictive element-1/neuron restrictive silencing element (RE-1/NRSE) sequence. Recently, a family of CRH-related peptides, termed the urocortins, has been identified.
    [Show full text]
  • G Protein-Coupled Receptors
    S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: G protein-coupled receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology (2015) 172, 5744–5869 THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: G protein-coupled receptors Stephen PH Alexander1, Anthony P Davenport2, Eamonn Kelly3, Neil Marrion3, John A Peters4, Helen E Benson5, Elena Faccenda5, Adam J Pawson5, Joanna L Sharman5, Christopher Southan5, Jamie A Davies5 and CGTP Collaborators 1School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK, 2Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK, 3School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK, 4Neuroscience Division, Medical Education Institute, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK, 5Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Abstract The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16 provides concise overviews of the key properties of over 1750 human drug targets with their pharmacology, plus links to an open access knowledgebase of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. The full contents can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1111/bph.13348/full. G protein-coupled receptors are one of the eight major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being: ligand-gated ion channels, voltage-gated ion channels, other ion channels, nuclear hormone receptors, catalytic receptors, enzymes and transporters. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuropeptide-Induced Contraction and Relaxation of the Mouse
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 81, pp. 625-629, January 1984 Physiological Sciences Neuropeptide-induced contraction and relaxation of the mouse anococcygeus muscle (neurohypophysial peptides/neurotensin/thyrotropin-releasing hormone/urotensin i/vasoactive intestinal polypeptide) ALAN GIBSON*, HOWARD A. BERNtt, MICHAEL GINSBURG*, AND JACK H. BOTTING* *Department of Pharmacology, Chelsea College, University of London, Manresa Road, London SW3 6LX, United Kingdom; and tDepartment of Zoology and Cancer Research Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Contributed by Howard A. Bern, September 26, 1983 ABSTRACT Isometric tension responses to neuropeptides fects of a wide range of neuropeptides on tone of the mouse were recorded from anococcygeus muscles isolated from male anococcygeus in vitro. mice. This smooth muscle tissue is innervated by inhibitory nonadrenergic, noncholinergic nerves that resemble, ultra- MATERIALS AND METHODS structurally, the peptidergic neurons of the gastrointestinal Male mice (LACA strain from A. Tuck & Son, Battles- tract; the physiological function of the anococcygeus is not bridge, Essex, U.K.; 25-35 g) were stunned and bled. Both known. Slow sustained contractions were produced by oxyto- anococcygeus muscles were dissected from the animal and cin (0.2-20 nM), [Arg8]vasopressin (0.4-200 nM), and [Arg]- set up in series, joined at the point of unification on the ven- vasotocin (0.4-100 nM); the mouse anococcygeus is, therefore, tral rectum, in 1-ml glass organ baths that contained Krebs one of the few examples of nonvascular smooth muscle from bicarbonate solution (mM: NaCl, 118.1; KCI, 4.7; MgSO4, male mammals to respond to low concentrations of oxytocin 1.0; KH2PO4, 1.2; CaCl2, 2.5; NaHCO3, 25.0; glucose, 11.1).
    [Show full text]
  • Urocortin 2 Autocrine/Paracrine and Pharmacologic Effects to Activate AMP-Activated Protein Kinase in the Heart
    Urocortin 2 autocrine/paracrine and pharmacologic effects to activate AMP-activated protein kinase in the heart Ji Lia, Dake Qib, Haiying Chengc, Xiaoyue Hub, Edward J. Millerd, Xiaohong Wub, Kerry S. Russellb, Nicole Mikushb, Jiasheng Zhangb, Lei Xiaoe, Robert S. Sherwinc, and Lawrence H. Youngb,1 aDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14214; bSection of Cardiovascular Medicine and cSection of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520; dDepartment of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA 02118; and eUniversity of Florida Shands Cancer Center, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610 Edited* by Gerald I. Shulman, Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Yale University, New Haven, CT, and approved August 9, 2013 (received for review July 11, 2013) Urocortin 2 (Ucn2), a peptide of the corticotropin-releasing factor Ucn2 (5). Signaling pathways have substantial cross-talk, and (CRF) family, binds with high affinity to type 2 CRF receptors pharmacologic inhibitor studies suggest a possible association (CRFR2) on cardiomyocytes and confers protection against ische- between activation of PKCe and the energy-stress kinase AMP- mia/reperfusion. The mechanisms by which the Ucn2-CRFR2 axis activated protein kinase (AMPK) (10). AMPK is activated by mitigates against ischemia/reperfusion injury remain incompletely changes in cellular energetics, but its activity is also modulated
    [Show full text]
  • Neuropeptide Regulation of Signaling and Behavior in the BNST
    Mol. Cells 2015; 38(1): 1-13 http://dx.doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2015.2261 Molecules and Cells http://molcells.org Established in 1990G Neuropeptide Regulation of Signaling and Behavior in the BNST Thomas L. Kash*, Kristen E. Pleil, Catherine A. Marcinkiewcz, Emily G. Lowery-Gionta, Nicole Crowley, Christopher Mazzone, Jonathan Sugam, J. Andrew Hardaway, and Zoe A. McElligott Recent technical developments have transformed how neu- aversion related behaviors, however there is also evidence that roscientists can probe brain function. What was once it can regulate appetitive responses. Numerous pharmacologi- thought to be difficult and perhaps impossible, stimulating a cal studies targeting different peptide systems as well as single set of long range inputs among many, is now relative- monoaminergic systems have found that the BNST plays a key ly straight-forward using optogenetic approaches. This has role in anxiety. For example, the Davis group has found that provided an avalanche of data demonstrating causal roles CRF in the BNST can potently enhance anxiety (Walker et al., for circuits in a variety of behaviors. However, despite the 2009b) and the Hammack group has found that PACAP signal- critical role that neuropeptide signaling plays in the regula- ing can alter stress responses (Kocho-Schellenberg et al., tion of behavior and physiology of the brain, there have 2014; Lezak et al., 2014a; 2014b). In support of this, recent been remarkably few studies demonstrating how peptide findings from several groups using optogenetic approaches release is causally linked to behaviors. This is likely due to have shown the BNST plays a role in anxiety (Jennings et al., both the different time scale by which peptides act on and 2013a; Kim et al., 2013), however these manuscripts also the modulatory nature of their actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinated Changes in Energy Intake and Expenditure Following Hypothalamic Administration of Neuropeptides Involved in Energy Balance
    Europe PMC Funders Group Author Manuscript Int J Obes (Lond). Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 January 01. Published in final edited form as: Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 July ; 33(7): 775–785. doi:10.1038/ijo.2009.96. Europe PMC Funders Author Manuscripts Coordinated changes in energy intake and expenditure following hypothalamic administration of neuropeptides involved in energy balance Nina M Semjonous*, Kirsty L Smith*, James RC Parkinson, David JL Gunner, Yong-Ling Liu, Kevin G Murphy, Mohammad A Ghatei, Stephen R Bloom, and Caroline J Small Department of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK Abstract Objective—The hypothalamic control of energy balance is regulated by a complex network of neuropeptide-releasing neurons. Whilst the effect of these neuropeptides on individual aspects of energy homeostasis has been studied, the coordinated response of these effects has not been comprehensively investigated. We have simultaneously monitored a number of metabolic parameters following ICV administration of 1nmol and 3nmol of neuropeptides with established roles in the regulation of feeding, activity and metabolism. Ad libitum fed rats received the orexigenic neuropeptides neuropeptide Y (NPY), agouti-related protein (AgRP), melanin- concentrating hormone (MCH) or orexin-A. Overnight food deprived rats received an ICV injection of the anorectic peptides α-MSH, corticotrophin releasing factor (CRF) or neuromedin U (NMU). Results—Our results reveal the temporal sequence of the effects of these neuropeptides on both Europe PMC Funders Author Manuscripts energy intake and expenditure, highlighting key differences in their function as mediators of energy balance. NPY and AgRP increased feeding and decreased oxygen consumption, with the effects of AgRP being more prolonged.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone at Peripheral Nociceptors: Implications for Pain Modulation
    biomedicines Review The Role of Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone at Peripheral Nociceptors: Implications for Pain Modulation Haiyan Zheng 1, Ji Yeon Lim 1, Jae Young Seong 1 and Sun Wook Hwang 1,2,* 1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea; [email protected] (H.Z.); [email protected] (J.Y.L.); [email protected] (J.Y.S.) 2 Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-2286-1204; Fax: +82-2-925-5492 Received: 12 November 2020; Accepted: 15 December 2020; Published: 17 December 2020 Abstract: Peripheral nociceptors and their synaptic partners utilize neuropeptides for signal transmission. Such communication tunes the excitatory and inhibitory function of nociceptor-based circuits, eventually contributing to pain modulation. Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) is the initiator hormone for the conventional hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, preparing our body for stress insults. Although knowledge of the expression and functional profiles of CRH and its receptors and the outcomes of their interactions has been actively accumulating for many brain regions, those for nociceptors are still under gradual investigation. Currently, based on the evidence of their expressions in nociceptors and their neighboring components, several hypotheses for possible pain modulations are emerging. Here we overview the historical attention to CRH and its receptors on the peripheral nociception and the recent increases in information regarding their roles in tuning pain signals. We also briefly contemplate the possibility that the stress-response paradigm can be locally intrapolated into intercellular communication that is driven by nociceptor neurons.
    [Show full text]
  • 2755.Full.Pdf
    (CANCER RESEARCH 49, 2755-2760, May 15, 1989] Corticotropin-releasing Factor and Vasopressin Production in the Rat Pituitary Tumor 7315a: Biochemical and Immunohistochemical Studies1 MaríaInésMoranoand Fernando E. Estivariz2 Centro de Estudios Endocrinos, Facultad de Ciencias Medicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Casilla de Correo 455, 1900 La Plata, Argentina ABSTRACT (16). We have found it interesting to study the production and secretion of hypothalamic factors by this tumor, principally In order to investigate the production and secretion of hypothalamic those involved in the control of POMC peptides secretion. In factors by the prolactin and proopiomelanocortin (POMC)-derived, pep- tide-producing, transplanta blu rat pituitary tumor 7315a, we determined the present report, we determined the tumor content and in the concentrations of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF)- and vasopres- vitro secretion of CRF and AVP, compared with the production sin (AVP)-like immunoreactivities (IR) in the tumor extracts [14.0 ±1.6 of rat prolactin and POMC peptides in the 7315a tumor. In (SE) and 4.2 ±0.9 pmol/g, respectively] and incubation media (0.26 ± addition, we have investigated the Chromatographie character 0.01 and 0.07 ±0.01pmol/107 cells/h, respectively). Total peptide content istics of the CRF- and AVP-like immunoreactivities, and fi correlated well with tumor weight. Moreover, there is a very good nally, we have explored the possibility of distinct populations correlation between the CRF and AVP IR, but not as good between CRF of tumor cells producing the different hormones. or AVP IR and POMC peptide IR tumor contents.
    [Show full text]
  • Urocortins: Emerging Metabolic and Energy Homeostasis Perspectives
    Review Urocortins: emerging metabolic and energy homeostasis perspectives Yael Kuperman and Alon Chen Department of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel The effects of stress on energy balance and the through the expression of neuropeptide Y and agouti-related pep- involvement of the neuropeptide corticotropin releasing tide. The Arc is accessible to circulating signals of energy balance, factor in modulating the anorexia of stress and sympath- through the underlying median eminence, because this region of the etic nervous system tone are well recognized. Currently, brain is not protected by the blood–brain barrier. Thus, the Arc serves as an integrative center responsible for information processing and studies centered on the roles of the more recently coordinating appropriate output [58]. described members of this family of ligands, the urocor- Bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST): the BNST is located within tins, and their preferred receptor, the corticotropin the basal forebrain and is considered to be the extended amygdala. It releasing factor type 2 receptor, suggest that they are seems to be involved in a number of complex functions, including important modulators of centrally controlled metabolic sexual behavior, autonomic function, anxiety and aversiveness of opiate withdrawal [58]. functions. In addition, urocortins also regulate fuel util- Dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN): the raphe nuclei are located in the ization in the periphery by acting locally within key midbrain and provide the major ascending serotonergic projection metabolic tissues through autocrine and/or paracrine to the forebrain. The raphe projects to the striatum, amygdala, mechanisms. Recent findings have demonstrated that caudate putamen, hippocampus, substantia nigra and locus coeru- urocortin 2 and urocortin 3, by acting through their leus.
    [Show full text]
  • Outperforming Sub-2 Um Totally Porous Particles Using Fused-Core Technology
    Outperforming Sub-2-µm Totally Porous Particles using Fused-Core Technology Robert E. Moran, Stephanie A. Schuster, Barry E. Boyes, William L. Miles Advanced Materials Technology Inc., Wilmington, DE 19810 Presented at EAS 2014 Abstract Comparing van Deemter Plots (h) Ballistic Separation of Anticoagulants Steroids Separation : HALO vs. TPP Explosive Separation : HALO vs. TPP Reduced Plate Height vs. Mobile Phase Velocity Plots Column : 2.1 x 100 mm Flow rate : 0.4 mL/min Sample : Column : 2.1 x 50 mm PFP Temperature : 30 °C Sample : Hydrocortisone Columns: 50 x 2.1 mm; Instrument: Shimadzu Nexera; Solute: naphthalene Peak Identities : Mobile Phase : 72/28 H2O/MeOH Temperature : 42 °C 1. HMX Column : 2.1 x 30 mm HALO 2 C18, 2µm, 90 Å Flow rate : 1.1 mL/min Detection : 240 nm Predisolone 2. RDX Mobile phase: Halo - 50/50 ACN/water, k = 6.3; o 1. Uracil Mobile Phase : 57% H2O/ 43% MeOH Cortisone Fused-core particles have shown distinct advantages over comparable Mobile phase A : 20 mM formic acid Temperature : 45 C Instrument : Shimadzu Nexera Detection : 254 nm 3. 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene 1.6 m SPP - 48.5/51.5 ACN/water, k = 6.3; 1.7 m SPP - 47/53 ACN/water, k = 6.2 2. 6,7-dihydroxycoumarin Flow rate : 0.3 mL/min Injection volume : 1.0 µL Prednisone o Mobile phase B : 50/50 ACN/MeOH Detection : 254 nm Injection volume : 1.0 µL 4. 1,3-Dinitrobenzene 1.7 m TPP - 48.5/51.5 ACN/water, k=6.3; Temperature: 35 C; Injection volume: 0.2 L 3.
    [Show full text]
  • G Protein‐Coupled Receptors
    S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: G protein-coupled receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology (2019) 176, S21–S141 THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: G protein-coupled receptors Stephen PH Alexander1 , Arthur Christopoulos2 , Anthony P Davenport3 , Eamonn Kelly4, Alistair Mathie5 , John A Peters6 , Emma L Veale5 ,JaneFArmstrong7 , Elena Faccenda7 ,SimonDHarding7 ,AdamJPawson7 , Joanna L Sharman7 , Christopher Southan7 , Jamie A Davies7 and CGTP Collaborators 1School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK 2Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia 3Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK 4School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK 5Medway School of Pharmacy, The Universities of Greenwich and Kent at Medway, Anson Building, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK 6Neuroscience Division, Medical Education Institute, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK 7Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Abstract The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20 is the fourth in this series of biennial publications. The Concise Guide provides concise overviews of the key properties of nearly 1800 human drug targets with an emphasis on selective pharmacology (where available), plus links to the open access knowledgebase source of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. Although the Concise Guide represents approximately 400 pages, the material presented is substantially reduced compared to information and links presented on the website.
    [Show full text]
  • Adrenomedullin Inhibits Connective Tissue Growth Factor Expression
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector original article http://www.kidney-international.org & 2008 International Society of Nephrology Adrenomedullin inhibits connective tissue growth factor expression, extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation and renal fibrosis T Nagae1, K Mori1, M Mukoyama1, M Kasahara1, H Yokoi1, T Suganami1, K Sawai1, T Yoshioka1, M Koshikawa1, Y Saito1, Y Ogawa1, T Kuwabara1, I Tanaka1, A Sugawara1, T Kuwahara2 and K Nakao1 1Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan and 2Department of Nephrology, Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital, Osaka, Japan Systemic administration of the potent vasodilating peptide Tubulointerstitial fibrosis is a common feature of progressive adrenomedullin reduces cardiac and renal fibrosis in renal injury and predicts the long-term outcome of renal hypertensive animals. Here, we investigated the effects function.1 Among proposed mechanisms by which interstitial of kidney-specific adrenomedullin gene delivery in fibrosis progresses, transforming growth factor-b (TGFB1) normotensive rats after unilateral ureteral obstruction, plays a central role in the pathogenesis.2–4 TGFB1 promotes an established model of renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis. the accumulation of extracellular matrix, through the enhan- Overexpression of exogenous adrenomedullin in the renal ced synthesis of extracellular matrix proteins, such as fibro- interstitium following ureteral
    [Show full text]