DOCSLIB.ORG

Enhanced Freight and Logistics Analysis Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Enhanced Freight and Logistics Analysis Report STRATEGIC TRANSPORT JANUARY 2018 PLAN EVIDENCE BASE This report has been commissioned by Transport for the North to inform development of its Strategic Transport Plan. Proposals and recommendations in the report are those of Arup. Publication of the report does not imply TfN endorsement of any material in the report. Document Verification Job title Enhanced Freight and Logistics Analysis Job number 253280-00 Document title Technical Report File reference Document ref Revision Date Filename 20170223 Draft 1 F&LP Technical Report, GMS.docx Draft 1 16 June Description First draft 2017 Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Graham Stewart Darren Briggs Darren Briggs Signature Draft 2 30 Jun Filename 20170630 Draft 7 F&LP Technical Report revised.docx 2017 Description Revised following client comments Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Graham Stewart Darren Briggs Darren Briggs Signature Issue 28 Jul Filename 20170728 ISSUE F&LP Technical Report.docx 2017 Description Issue Version of final document following comments from partners Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Graham Stewart Darren Briggs Darren Briggs Signature Filename Description Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Signature Issue Document Verification with Document ✓ Transport for the North Enhanced Freight and Logistics Analysis Report Contents Page Executive Summary 1 1 Introduction 9 1.1 Structure of the Report 9 2 Context 10 2.1 Aims and Objectives 10 2.2 Strategic Transport Plan (STP) 10 2.3 Previous Freight Report 12 2.4 STP Evidence Base 12 2.5 Scope of Work 13 2.6 The North’s Transport Network 13 2.7 Key Freight Operators 20 3 Methodology 22 3.1 Introduction 22 3.2 The Great Britain Freight Model (GBFM) 22 3.3 Methodology 22 3.4 Representation of the Data 23 4 The Case for Investment 26 4.1 Growth Forecast 26 4.2 Road Freight 29 4.3 Rail Freight 52 4.4 Waterborne Freight 83 4.5 Air Freight 92 4.6 Key Freight Flows 94 4.7 Drivers for Change 108 4.8 Summary 117 5 The North’s Freight and Logistics Vision 122 5.1 Introduction 122 5.2 The Vision 122 5.3 The Future of Freight 123 5.4 Maximise the use of existing assets 128 5.5 Delivering effective investment through the correct modal mix 135 5.6 Providing Skills, and utilising data to plan for the future 156 6 Recommended Next Steps 158 6.1 Introduction 158 Transport for the North Enhanced Freight and Logistics Analysis Report 6.2 Freight and Logistics Action Plan 158 Appendices Appendix A Freight Movements by Commodity Appendix B Freight Movements by Port Group Appendix C Key Flows Transport for the North Enhanced Freight and Logistics Analysis Report Executive Summary Transport for the North Summary Transport for the North (TfN) is progressing to become England’s first Sub- National Transport Body. There is a partnership of Transport Authorities, Delivery Partners and Local Enterprise Partnerships all working together to agree a Strategic Transport Plan for the North of England. The plan will cover passengers on road and rail, freight on road and rail, inland waterways, coastal shipping, ports and airports for passengers and freight. A truly multimodal approach. To enable the plan to be delivered, TfN needed to understand the needs of the freight and logistics industry and the infrastructure required for it to grow. Concisely put – why would TfN need to invest in the networks for the freight and logistics industry? This Report This report provides the baseline for understanding the North’s markets and travel patterns for road, rail, air, coastal shipping and inland waterway for freight. The data is mapped with no assumptions of schemes being delivered in the future, the growth is simply overlaid on the current network. The need for investment in the infrastructure to accommodate growth in the freight industry can be seen. The maps show clear growth in tonnages for freight movements. This is based on the analysis from the Northern Powerhouse Independent Economic Review completed by TfN in June 2016 which showed significant economic growth is possible in the North if the transport systems are right. Therefore, there is tangible evidence that the freight and logistics industry need the investment in infrastructure just as much as passengers do. When the networks break down, the freight industry pauses in just the same way as the passenger network. The growth that has been applied to the network has implications for sustainability and air quality. TfN are working on corridor studies across the North to understand the programmes of investment required to make the networks more efficient within the study areas. The first three studies are Connecting the Energy Coasts, Central Pennines and West and Wales. The work completed within this report will feed directly into the studies and will be made available to the consultancy teams. Finally, the content of the report has been presented to TfN and written by a team at Arup. TfN and its partners will decide which recommendations to take forward in the coming months and which to include in the corridor studies currently underway. Page 1 Transport for the North Enhanced Freight and Logistics Analysis Report Aims and Objectives The Northern Powerhouse Independent Economic Review (NPIER) was published in June 2016 and set out that by 2050, a transformed economy in the North would feature the following: • Gross Value Added (GVA) projected to be 15% (£100 billion) higher than business as usual projections; • Productivity would be 4% higher; and • 850,000 additional jobs would be created. Transport for the North, seeking to become the Government’s statutory body tasked with improving transport in the North of England, are therefore integral to achieving the outcomes of NPIER. Freight and Logistics as a key enabling capability to achieving transformational economic growth is a prime focus and therefore there is an important requirement to set out how investment should be made in the transport network to ensure it meets the demands that will be placed upon it by passengers and freight. Strategic Transport Plan (STP) TfN are developing a Strategic Transport Plan (STP) alongside a long term investment programme to support the people and businesses across the North and to create a stronger, more diverse and resilient place for people to live, commute and conduct business. TfN has published a variety of other reports which make up the evidence base for the STP. For each of these reports, an element of this enhanced freight and logistics analysis has been used although since these reports were published, the freight analysis has been further developed and enhanced, the outcome of this work is contained within this report. In addition to the freight and logistics reports (this report and the initial freight study), the STP evidence base is also made up of: • Major Roads Report; • Integrated Rail Report; • Independent International Connectivity Report; and • Economic Appraisal. This evidence base will be used within the Strategic Development Corridor studies which will be undertaken by TfN to produce a prioritised programme of investment. Page 2 Transport for the North Enhanced Freight and Logistics Analysis Report The North’s Transport Network The North boasts a wealth of freight assets that grant the North a strong multimodal freight capability. These include: • Eleven major ports in addition to other smaller ports located on the Tyne, Tees, Humber and Mersey as well as in Lancashire, Cumbria and Northumberland; • Seven international airports including Liverpool John Lennon, Leeds- Bradford, Doncaster-Sheffield, Humberside, Durham Tees Valley and Newcastle in addition to the major international airport at Manchester; • Three Strategic Rail Freight Interchanges (SRFIs – distribution centres with intermodal terminals) at Ditton, Wakefield and Selby with more emerging; • Five further Intermodal Terminals at Trafford Park, Leeds, Garston, Doncaster and Widnes; • A Strategic Road Network focused on the M62/M60/M56 and A66/69 East-West corridors and the M6 and M1/A1 North-South corridors; • A strategic rail network principally comprising of the West Coast Main Line, East Coast Main Line and Midland Main Lines that connect the North of England to the South and the Transpennine routes; and • A significant amount of distribution centre capacity. Despite these assets being available, many are not being fully utilised due to a number of reasons such as lack of joined up infrastructure or attractive alternative logistics solutions. Gaps in connectivity prevail that urgently require investment; 80% of road freight in the North is domestic traffic, most of which is short haul (making it difficult to justify the use of rail on commercial or efficiency grounds), which places a heavy burden on the strategic road network. Mode Share and Growth Forecasts Through use of the Great Britain Freight Model (GBFM) which has been adapted to include NPIER growth forecasts for 2050, it is possible to identify the current and future mode share of freight being moved in the North and to identify the growth predicted. The metrics used for this include tonnes lifted (the overall tonnage of freight moved) and tonne km (the total freight moved multiplied by the distance it is moved). The mode share of freight moved in the North and based on tonnes lifted is: • Road 91.0% (2016), 91.0% (2050) • Rail 7.0% (2016), 7.3% (2050) • Waterway 2.0% (2016), 1.7% (2050) Page 3 Transport for the North Enhanced Freight and Logistics Analysis Report However, by using the tonne kms metric, the mode share is as follows: • Road 87.2% (2016), 88.0% (2050) • Rail 12.1% (2016), 11.6% (2050) • Waterway 0.6% (2016), 0.4% (2050) As freight is generally moved over longer distances by rail it is more accurately reflected using the tonne km metric.
Recommended publications
  • Railfreight in Colour for the Modeller and Historian Free

    Railfreight in Colour for the Modeller and Historian Free

    FREE RAILFREIGHT IN COLOUR FOR THE MODELLER AND HISTORIAN PDF David Cable | 96 pages | 02 May 2009 | Ian Allan Publishing | 9780711033641 | English | Surrey, United Kingdom PDF Br Ac Electric Locomotives In Colour Download Book – Best File Book The book also includes a historical examination of the development of electric locomotives, allied to hundreds of color illustrations with detailed captions. An outstanding collection of photographs revealing the life and times of BR-liveried locomotives and rolling stock at a when they could be seen Railfreight in Colour for the Modeller and Historian across the network. The AL6 or Class 86 fleet of ac locomotives represents the BRB ' s second generation of main - line electric traction. After introduction of the various new business sectorsInterCity colours appeared in various guiseswith the ' Swallow ' livery being applied from Also in Cab superstructure — Light grey colour aluminium paint considered initially. The crest originally proposed was like that used on the AC electric locomotives then being deliveredbut whether of cast aluminium or a transfer is not quite International Railway Congress at Munich 60 years of age and over should be given the B. Multiple - aspect colour - light signalling has option of retiring on an adequate pension to Consideration had been given to AC Locomotive Group reports activity on various fronts in connection with its comprehensive collection of ac electric locos. Some of the production modelshoweverwill be 25 kV ac electric trains designed to work on BR ' s expanding electrified network. Headlight circuits for locomotives used in multiple - unit operation may be run through the end jumpers to a special selector switch remote Under the tower's jurisdiction are 4 color -light signals and subsidiary signals for Railfreight in Colour for the Modeller and Historian movements.
  • Gülnak and Cape Mathilde Were Completed in Teesport

    Gülnak and Cape Mathilde Were Completed in Teesport

    ACCIDENT REPORT MA RINE ACCI DENT INVES TIGAT ION BRA NCH SERIOUS MARINE CASUALTY REPORT NO 5/2020 FEBRUARY 2020 Extract from The Collision between the bulk carrier Gülnak and United Kingdom the moored bulk carrier Cape Mathilde Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and River Tees, England on 18 April 2019 Investigation) Regulations 2012 – Regulation 5: SUMMARY “The sole objective of the investigation of an accident On 18 April 2019, the Turkey registered bulk carrier Gülnak collided with the under the Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Panama registered bulk carrier Cape Mathilde, which was moored alongside the Investigation) Regulations Redcar bulk terminal, Teesport, England. Both vessels were damaged but there 2012 shall be the prevention of future accidents through were no injuries and there was no pollution. the ascertainment of its Images courtesy of Kenneth Karsten and www.shipspotting.com causes and circumstances. It shall not be the purpose of an such investigation to determine liability nor, except so far as is necessary to achieve its objective, to apportion blame.” NOTE This report is not written with litigation in mind and, pursuant to Regulation 14(14) of the Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation) Regulations 2012, shall be inadmissible in any judicial proceedings whose purpose, or one of whose purposes is to attribute or apportion liability or blame. © Crown copyright, 2020 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication.
  • M42 Junction 6 Improvement Scheme

    M42 Junction 6 Improvement Scheme

    M42 junction 6 Improvement scheme Statutory public consultation 9 January 2018 to 19 February 2018 Contents Introduction ........................................... 3 The scheme in detail (maps) ................. 16 Consultation .......................................... 4 Proposed land requirements ................. 19 Why do we need How this scheme may impact this scheme? ......................................... 6 on you .................................................. 20 Construction impacts ........................... 24 Scheme benefits and objectives ....................................... 7 What happens next ............................. 25 Evolution of the scheme ...................... 8 Proposed timeline ................................. 25 The preferred route ............................. 9 Consultation events ........................... 26 Incorporating your views .................. 10 Consultation information available ......... 26 Deposit point locations ...................... 27 What are we proposing .......................11 Contact information ............................... 27 Cycle routes and non-motorised users (NMU) ................................................... 12 Consultation questionnaire ............... 28 Traffic ................................................... 14 Impacts on the environment ................. 15 2 Introduction Highways England is a Government-owned During 2016, we identified and assessed a number company. We are responsible for the operation, of options to improve the junction. Following
  • Volume 5.0 M4 Junctions 3 to 12 Smart Motorway TR010019

    Volume 5.0 M4 Junctions 3 to 12 Smart Motorway TR010019

    Safe roads, reliable journeys, informed travellers M4 junctions 3 to 12 smart motorway TR010019 5.1 Consultation report Revision 0 March 2015 Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Volume 5.0 Volume An executive agency of the Department for Transport HIGHWAYS AGENCY – M4 JUNCTIONS 3 TO 12 SMART MOTORWAY TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 3 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 SCHEME OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 7 1.2 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 PURPOSE OF REPORT ......................................................................................................................... 10 1.4 CONSULTATION OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................. 10 1.5 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT .............................................................................................................. 13 2 LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT ............................................................................................................ 15 2.1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................
  • The Role for Rail in Port-Based Container Freight Flows in Britain

    The Role for Rail in Port-Based Container Freight Flows in Britain

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by WestminsterResearch The role for rail in port-based container freight flows in Britain ALLAN WOODBURN Bionote Dr Allan Woodburn is a Senior Lecturer in the Transport Studies Group at the University of Westminster, London, NW1 5LS. He specialises in freight transport research and teaching, mainly related to operations, planning and policy and with a particular interest in rail freight. 1 The role for rail in port-based container freight flows in Britain ALLAN WOODBURN Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 20 7911 5000 Fax: +44 20 7911 5057 Abstract As supply chains become increasingly global and companies seek greater efficiencies, the importance of good, reliable land-based transport linkages to/from ports increases. This poses particular problems for the UK, with its high dependency on imported goods and congested ports and inland routes. It is conservatively estimated that container volumes through British ports will double over the next 20 years, adding to the existing problems. This paper investigates the potential for rail to become better integrated into port-based container flows, so as to increase its share of this market and contribute to a more sustainable mode split. The paper identifies the trends in container traffic through UK ports, establishes the role of rail within this market, and assesses the opportunities and threats facing rail in the future. The analysis combines published statistics and other information relating to container traffic and original research on the nature of the rail freight market, examining recent trends and future prospects.
  • (A) DB Cargo (UK) Limited Whose Registered Office Is at Lakeside Business Park, Carolina Way, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN4 5PN (“DBC”) (“The Claimant”); And

    (A) DB Cargo (UK) Limited Whose Registered Office Is at Lakeside Business Park, Carolina Way, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN4 5PN (“DBC”) (“The Claimant”); And

    1 DETAILS OF PARTIES 1.1 The names and addresses of the parties to the reference are as follows; (a) DB Cargo (UK) Limited whose Registered Office is at Lakeside Business Park, Carolina Way, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN4 5PN (“DBC”) (“The Claimant”); and (b) Network Rail Infrastructure Limited whose Registered Office is at 1 Eversholt Street, London NW1 2DN (“Network Rail”) (“The Respondent”). (c) Contact details for DB Cargo: Graham White, Access Manager South, Lakeside Business Park, Carolina Way, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN4 5PN. (d) Contact details for Network Rail: Duncan Lovatt & Richard Hooper, Network Rail, Wales Route. 2 DETAILS OF REFERENCE 2.1 This matter is referred to a Timetable Panel (“the Panel”) for determination in accordance with Condition D5 of the Network Code 2.2 This Dispute arises from a decision of Network Rail in respect of Network Rail variations made pursuant to Condition D3.5 of the Network Code 3 CONTENTS OF REFERENCE This Sole Reference includes: - (a) The subject matter of the dispute in Section 4; (b) A detailed explanation of the issues in dispute in Section 5; (c) In Section 6, the decision sought from the panel in respect of legal entitlement. 4 SUBJECT MATTER OF DISPUTE 4.1 This dispute arises from the Late Notice Restrictions of Use between Stoke Gifford No 2/ Caldicot and Leckwith Loop North Jn from 0200 on Saturday 19th October to 0420 on Monday 21st October 2019. Possession Reference P2019/2680990 4.2 Copied and annexed to this Reference are: • Appendix A: DB Cargo (UK) Ltd response to 157-W30-WA19 (original) [Part] • Appendix B: Re-Issued request 157-W30-WA19 1 • Appendix C: DB Cargo (UK) Ltd response to 157-W30-WA19 (subsequent re-issue) [Part] • Appendix D: Decision document for Re-Issued request 157-WA30-WA19 [Part] • Appendix E: Works planned within the restriction of use.
  • Connecting Communities: Improving Transport to Get 'Left Behind'

    Connecting Communities: Improving Transport to Get 'Left Behind'

    Connecting communities: improving transport to get ‘left behind’ neighbourhoods back on track March 2021 This is not an official publication of the House of Commons or the House of Lords. It has not been approved by either House or its committees.All-Party-Parliamentary Groups are informal groups of Members of both Houses with a common interest in particular issues. The views expressed in this report are those of the group. This report was researched by OCSI, Campaign for Better Transport, and Local Trust. It was funded by Local Trust, secretariat to the APPG for ‘left behind’ neighbourhoods. Connecting communities: improving transport to get ‘left behind’ neighbourhoods back on track 1 About the All-Party Parliamentary About this report Group for ‘left behind’ The APPG held its fifth evidence session on neighbourhoods 26th January 2021: Buses, broadband and The All-Party Parliamentary Group for ‘left behind’ Beeching – boosting connectivity in ‘left behind’ neighbourhoods is a cross party group of MPs neighbourhoods. This report is a reflection of and Peers. It is committed to improving social that session and the data presented at it. and economic outcomes for residents living in ‘left behind’ neighbourhoods, through the It considered how poor levels of connectivity – development and advocacy of neighbourhood both physical and digital – can contribute to initiatives and policies. an area being ‘left behind’ compounding other disadvantages faced by residents including appg-leftbehindneighbourhoods.org.uk poor health and educational attainment @appgleftbehind and unemployment. The APPG heard how this can make it harder for local people to take About Local Trust sustained action and make improvements to their personal circumstances and their Local Trust is a place-based funder supporting community's prospects.
  • River Frontage

    River Frontage

    PORT OF BARROW-IN-FURNESS Site: Site size (Available land area etc): • South Side of Ramsden Dock = Lay down and storage area of 18 – 20 acres • North Side of Anchor Line Basin = Lay down and storage area of 10 – 12 acres • Additional land adjacent to Port Estate available Details of wet and dry dock facilities/ river frontage/ site quayside accessibility: • Approx 500m of general quay frontage • A further 500m (approx) of quay frontage with heavy lift capability • BAE Systems Shipbuilding Facility partly located within port estate. Buildings and warehousing: • 6000m2 warehouse on site • Waterfront Business Park adjacent to port estate offers opportunities for new buildings and warehouse facility. Maximum Vessel capacity (length, width, draught (m)): • Length = up to 200 metres (subject to certain criteria for vessels over 170m LOA) • Beam = Dock entrance width = 36 metres • Draught = variable but typically up to 8 metres or more • No.1 Dock Gate opens 2.5 hours before high water, closes at high water or shortly after. Nearby industrial sites (approx. distance from port) vacant or otherwise: • Vacant Waterfront Business Park adjacent to port estate = approx 40 acres Location, Transport and Connections - Location i.e. nearest cities/industrial areas: • Barrow-in-Furness Town Centre = 1.5km away from the port • Lancaster = 75km • Preston = 108km • Manchester = 160km Major road, rail, water and air transport links: • A590 – From Barrow = 50km to M6 Motorway • Rail – Dock rail link to Furness Line which is connected to West Coast main Line
  • Network Rail Response with Appendices

    Network Rail Response with Appendices

    Defendant’s Response to Sole Reference Ref: TTP1546 1 of 9 1 DETAILS OF PARTIES 1.1 The names and addresses of the parties to the reference are as follows:- (a) Freightliner Limited whose Registered Office is at 3rd Floor, 90 Whitfield Street, London W1T 4EZ (“Freightliner”) ("the Claimant"); and (b) Network Rail Infrastructure Limited whose Registered Office is at 1 Eversholt Street, London NW1 2DN ("Network Rail") ("the Defendant"). 1.2 Other Train and Freight Operating Companies that could be affected by the outcome of this dispute: (a) Greater Anglia (Abellio East Anglia Ltd), MTR Corporation (Crossrail) Ltd, Arriva Rail London Ltd, GB Railfreight Ltd, DB Cargo (UK) Ltd, c2c (Trenitalia c2c Ltd) 2 CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT This Response to the Claimant’s Sole Reference includes:- (a) Confirmation, or qualification, that the subject matter of the dispute is as set out by the Claimant in its Sole Reference, in the form of a summary schedule cross-referenced to the issues raised by the Claimant in the Sole Reference, identifying which the Defendant agrees with and which it disagrees with. (b) A detailed explanation of the Defendant’s arguments in support of its position on those issues where it disagrees with the Claimant’s Sole Reference, including references to documents or contractual provisions not dealt with in the Claimant’s Sole Reference. (c) Any further related issues not raised by the Claimant but which the Defendant considers fall to be determined as part of the dispute; (d) The decisions of principle sought from the Panel in respect of (i) legal entitlement, and (ii) remedies; (e) Appendices and other supporting material.
  • Depot Information United Kingdom & Ireland

    Depot Information United Kingdom & Ireland

    Depot Information United Kingdom & Ireland UNITED KINGDOM Depot Name Address Post Code Telephone no. Email address (ABP) EXXTOR Terminal, Mineral Quay Road, ABP (Associated British Ports) Immingham Dock, Immingham DN40 2QT +44 (0) 1469 551308 [email protected] Belfast Containers (N.I) 2000 Ltd Dargan Drive, Harbour Industrial Estate, Belfast BT3 9JG +44 (0) 2890371717 [email protected] Coastal House, Victoria Terminal 3, Westbank +44 (0) 7584250276 [email protected] Belfast Container Terminal Road, Belfast BT3 9JL +44 (0) 7584249661 [email protected] Corstor Ltd Sub-Station Road, Felixstowe, Suffolk IP11 3JB +44 (0) 1394 674210 [email protected] DB Schenker Wakefield Euro Terminal Wakefield Europort, Normanton WF10 5UA +44 (0) 1302-576028 [email protected] DP World London Gateway Gate 2, The Manorway, Stanford-Le-Hope SS17 9PD +44 (0) 1375 648300 [email protected] DP World Southampton 204 - 207 Weston Docks, Southampton SO15 1DA +44 (0) 2380-701701 [email protected] Duncan Adams Ltd Grangedock, Grangemouth FK3 8UG +44 (0) 1324-484951 [email protected] Eldapoint Ltd (Felixstowe) Sub-Station Road, Felixstowe, Suffolk IP11 3JB +44 (0) 1394 270777 [email protected] Eldapoint Ltd (Grangemouth) Laurieston Road, Thornbridge, Grangemouth FK3 8XX +44 (0) 1324 638918 [email protected].,uk Charleywood Road, Knowsley Industrial Park Eldapoint Ltd (Liverpool) North, Liverpool L33 7SG +44 (0) 151-632 9330 [email protected]
  • North East Transport Plan

    North East Transport Plan

    North East Transport Plan Habitat Regulations Assessment North East Joint Transport Committee March 2021 Habitats Regulations Assessment for the North East Transport Plan Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Georgia Stephens Isla Hoffmann Heap Dr James Riley Dr James Riley Graduate Ecologist Senior Ecologist Technical Director Technical Director Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 0 8/03/21 For committee JR James Riley Technical Director 1 08/03/21 For committee JR James Riley Technical Director Prepared for: North East Joint Transport Committee Prepared by: AECOM Limited Midpoint, Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com © 2021 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: Transport North East Strategy Unit AECOM Habitats Regulations Assessment for the North East Transport Plan Table of Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 Background
  • Ve — LISTE DES PORTS ACCEPTANT LES MESSAGES INTERNATIONAUX DE QUARANTAINE PAR RADIO V. — LIST of PORTS ACCEPTING INTERNATIONAL QUARANTINE MESSAGES by WIRELESS

    Ve — LISTE DES PORTS ACCEPTANT LES MESSAGES INTERNATIONAUX DE QUARANTAINE PAR RADIO V. — LIST of PORTS ACCEPTING INTERNATIONAL QUARANTINE MESSAGES by WIRELESS

    — l i ­ ve — LISTE DES PORTS ACCEPTANT LES MESSAGES INTERNATIONAUX DE QUARANTAINE PAR RADIO V. — LIST OF PORTS ACCEPTING INTERNATIONAL QUARANTINE MESSAGES BY WIRELESS Nom du Port* — Cir­ Adresse télégraphique de Détails sur la Station de Noms et adresses des Agents Renseigne­ conscription adminis­ l'Autorité saintoire du Port réception des messages habilités pour recevoir et trans­ m ents com­ trative (entre paren­ et Indicatif d'appel* mettre les messages plementaires thèses) voir page. [Réponse à Question Sjf [Réponse à Question 3]t [Réponse à Question 3 ] t [Réponse à Question 4]t Name of Port* — Admi­ Telegraphic Address of Port Particulars of receiving Names and addresses of approved Supplemen­ nistrative Local Area Health Authority Station accepting messa­ Agents for receiving and trans­ tary Infor­ (between bracketsJ ges and signal call • mitting messages mation [Reply to Question. 2] t [Reply to Question a] T [Reply to Question 4 ]t see p age' [Reply to Question 311 1 * o 3 * 4 5 AFRIQUE — AFRICA AFRIQUE OCCIDENTALE FRANÇAISE — FRENCH WEST AFRICA Dakar I A g e n t p r i n c i p a l S a n t é I Dakar côtier I Aucun (None) 23 I D a k a r 1 | CONGO BELGE — BELGIAN CONGO Banana j S a n i p o r t B a n a n a j — j Aucun (None) 23 CÔTE FRANÇAISE DES SOMALIS — FRENCH SOMALILAND Djibouti I S e r v i c e quarantenaire I — I Aucun (None) 24 D j i b o u t i | I ILE MAURICE — MAURITIUS Port Louis P o r t H e a l t h O f f i c e r 1 — 1 None (Aucun) 24 P o r t L o u i s | I RÉUNION Port des Galets S x n té m a r it im e I Saint-Denis I Aucun (None) 25 P o r t d e s G a l e t s | Reunion | SIERRA LEONE Freetown H e a l t h F r e e t o w n Freetown None (Aucun) 25 Cable and Wireless Co.