DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Proposal to the Adaptation Fund

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Proposal to the Adaptation Fund PROJECT PROPOSAL TO THE ADAPTATION FUND Project/Programme Category: Regular Country/ies: Djibouti Title of Project/Programme: Integrated Water and Soil Resources Management Project (Projet de gestion intégrée des ressources en eau et des sols PROGIRES) Type of Implementing Entity: Multilateral Implementing Entity Implementing Entity: International Fund for Agricultural Development Executing Entity/ies: Ministry of Agriculture, Water, Fisheries and Livestock Amount of Financing Requested: 5,339,285 (in U.S Dollars Equivalent) i Table of Contents PART I: PROJECT/PROGRAMME INFORMATION ......................................................................... 1 A. Project Background and Context ............................................................................. 1 Geography ............................................................................................... 1 Climate .................................................................................................... 2 Socio-Economic Context ............................................................................ 3 Agriculture ............................................................................................... 5 Gender .................................................................................................... 7 Climate trends and impacts ........................................................................ 9 Project Upscaling and Lessons Learned ...................................................... 19 Relationship with IFAD PGIRE Project ........................................................ 21 Targeting and Targeting Strategies ........................................................... 22 B. Project / Programme Objectives ........................................................................... 25 C. Project / Programme Components and Financing .................................................... 26 D. Projected Calendar: ............................................................................................ 27 PART II: PROJECT JUSTIFICATION .............................................................................................. 28 A. Project Components ........................................................................ 28 B. Environmental, Social and Economic Benefits ....................................... 41 C. Cost-effectiveness ............................................................................. 46 D. Strategic Alignment ............................................................................................ 51 E. National Technical Standards and Environment and Social Policy .............................. 55 F. Duplication with other funding sources .................................................................. 57 G. Learning, knowledge management and lessons learned. ............................................ 1 H. Consultative Process ............................................................................................. 1 I. Justification for Funding ......................................................................................... 4 J. Project Sustainability ............................................................................................ 7 K. Socio-Environmental Impacts and Risks .................................................................. 9 PART III: IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS .......................................................................... 18 A. Arrangements for project implementation .............................................................. 18 B. Financial and Project Risk Management ................................................................. 22 C. Environmental and Social Risk Management ........................................................... 26 D. Monitoring and Evaluation Arrangements ............................................................... 27 E. Results Framework ............................................................................................. 31 ii F. Alignment with the Adaptation Fund Results Framework .......................................... 37 G. Project budget .................................................................................................... 39 H. Disbursement Schedule ....................................................................................... 42 PART IV: ENDORSEMENT BY GOVERNMENT AND CERTIFICATION BY THE IMPLEMENTING ENTITY ....................................................................................................................................... 44 Annex 1 Gannt Chart ............................................................................... 45 Annex 2: Climate risk analysis .................................................................. 49 Annex 3 Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) ..................... 57 Annex 4: Grievance Mechanism ................................................................ 99 Annex 5 Gender Assessment .................................................................. 105 Annex 6 Potential Partner Evaluation Matrix ............................................. 121 Annex 7 Gender Sensitive Design Checklist .............................................. 122 Annex 8 Organigramme of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries .......................................................................................................... 127 Annex 9 Persons met............................................................................. 128 Annex 10 Agenda of the mission and partners met .................................... 129 List of Figures Figure 1 Project area ..................................................................................................... viii Figure 2 Annual climate in Djibouti: Precipitation (Left), temperature (Right) ........................... 3 Figure 3 Poverty rate by region .......................................................................................... 5 Figure 4 November 2019 floods. Affected areas in the country and in Djibouti City ................. 11 Figure 5 Monthly temperature and trend (1901-2017) Obock ............................................... 49 Figure 6 Mean temperature and trend (1901-2017) Tadjourah ............................................. 51 Figure 7 Mean temperature and trend (1901-2017) Dikhil ................................................... 53 Figure 8 Mean temperature and trend (1901-2017) Ali Sabieh ............................................. 55 List of Tables Table 1 Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall of Djibouti for 1901-2016 .......................... 9 Table 2 Changes in mean annual temperature and rainfall in 2050 in the Republic of Djibouti .. 10 Table 3 Natural disaster statistics in Djibouti: Number of people affected by the 3 main hazards (left) and average distribution of disaster types (right) ....................................................... 12 Table 4 Vulnerability assessment of resources and sectors ................................................... 13 iii Table 5 Communities Vulnerability/Exposure to Vulnerability ............................................... 14 Table 6 Key Adaptation Measures Recommended for the Agriculture and Water Sectors .......... 15 Table 7 Project components and financing ............................................................................... 26 Table 8 Project calendar .................................................................................................. 27 Table 9 First list of selected IGAs ...................................................................................... 37 Table 10 Correlation between project interventions and climate change adaptation measures .. 43 Table 11 Shared execution costs between PROGIRES and PGIRE .......................................... 47 Table 12 Quantifiable benefits .......................................................................................... 48 Table 13 Correlation between the PROGIRES activities and the priority axes of the Strategy and the National Action Plan on Biodiversity ............................................................................. 54 Table 14 Priority areas for donor action ............................................................................. 57 Table 15 Summary of Donors funded projects coordinated by the MAEPE-RH ........................... 0 Table 16 Justification for funding ........................................................................................ 4 Table 17 environmental and social impacts and risks .......................................................... 10 Table 18 Final risk assessment and proposed mitigation measures ....................................... 24 Table 19 Monitoring & Evaluation Plan ............................................................................... 29 Table 20 Budgeted Monitoring & Evaluation Plan ................................................................ 30 Table 21 Results Framework ............................................................................................ 31 Table 22 Alignment with the Results Framework of the Adaptation Fund ................................ 37 Table 23 Budget of the project ......................................................................................... 39 Table 24 Disbursement schedule ...................................................................................... 42 Table 23 Adaptation Fund environmental and social checklist .............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Analysis of the Afar-Somali Conflict in Ethiopia and Djibouti
    Regional Dynamics of Inter-ethnic Conflicts in the Horn of Africa: An Analysis of the Afar-Somali Conflict in Ethiopia and Djibouti DISSERTATION ZUR ERLANGUNG DER GRADES DES DOKTORS DER PHILOSOPHIE DER UNIVERSTÄT HAMBURG VORGELEGT VON YASIN MOHAMMED YASIN from Assab, Ethiopia HAMBURG 2010 ii Regional Dynamics of Inter-ethnic Conflicts in the Horn of Africa: An Analysis of the Afar-Somali Conflict in Ethiopia and Djibouti by Yasin Mohammed Yasin Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR (POLITICAL SCIENCE) in the FACULITY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES at the UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG Supervisors Prof. Dr. Cord Jakobeit Prof. Dr. Rainer Tetzlaff HAMBURG 15 December 2010 iii Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to thank my doctoral fathers Prof. Dr. Cord Jakobeit and Prof. Dr. Rainer Tetzlaff for their critical comments and kindly encouragement that made it possible for me to complete this PhD project. Particularly, Prof. Jakobeit’s invaluable assistance whenever I needed and his academic follow-up enabled me to carry out the work successfully. I therefore ask Prof. Dr. Cord Jakobeit to accept my sincere thanks. I am also grateful to Prof. Dr. Klaus Mummenhoff and the association, Verein zur Förderung äthiopischer Schüler und Studenten e. V., Osnabruck , for the enthusiastic morale and financial support offered to me in my stay in Hamburg as well as during routine travels between Addis and Hamburg. I also owe much to Dr. Wolbert Smidt for his friendly and academic guidance throughout the research and writing of this dissertation. Special thanks are reserved to the Department of Social Sciences at the University of Hamburg and the German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA) that provided me comfortable environment during my research work in Hamburg.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Thesis
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ The making of hazard: a social-environmental explanation of vulnerability to drought in Djibouti Daher Aden, Ayanleh Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 06. Oct. 2021 The making of a hazard: a social-environmental explanation of vulnerability to drought in Djibouti Thesis submitted to King’s College London For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Ayanleh Daher Aden Department of Geography Faculty of Social Science and Public Policy December 2014 “The key to riding the wave of chaos is not to resist it, but to allow yourself to know you are a part of the energy of chaos, allowing a new form of organization in it, rather than imposing your old system organization upon it.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Proposal to the Adaptation Fund
    PROJECT PROPOSAL TO THE ADAPTATION FUND Project/Programme Category: Regular Country/ies: Djibouti Title of Project/Programme: Integrated Water and Soil Resources Management Project (Projet de gestion intégrée des ressources en eau et des sols PROGIRES) Type of Implementing Entity: Multilateral Implementing Entity Implementing Entity: International Fund for Agricultural Development Executing Entity/ies: Ministry of Agriculture, Water, Fisheries and Livestock Amount of Financing Requested: 5,339,285 (in U.S Dollars Equivalent) i Table of Contents PART I: PROJECT/PROGRAMME INFORMATION ......................................................................... 1 A. Project Background and Context ............................................................................. 1 Geography ............................................................................................... 1 Climate .................................................................................................... 2 Socio-Economic Context ............................................................................ 3 Agriculture ............................................................................................... 5 Gender .................................................................................................... 7 Climate trends and impacts ........................................................................ 9 Project Upscaling and Lessons Learned ...................................................... 19 Relationship with IFAD PGIRE Project .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Implementing Ecosystem Based Adaptation (Eba) in Djibouti’S Dikhil and Tadjourah Regions
    5/6/2020 WbgGefportal Project Identification Form (PIF) entry – Full Sized Project – GEF - 7 Planning and implementing Ecosystem based Adaptation (EbA) in Djibouti’s Dikhil and Tadjourah regions Part I: Project Information GEF ID 10180 Project Type FSP Type of Trust Fund LDCF CBIT/NGI CBIT NGI Project Title Planning and implementing Ecosystem based Adaptation (EbA) in Djibouti’s Dikhil and Tadjourah regions Countries Djibouti Agency(ies) UNEP Other Executing Partner(s) Executing Partner Type Ministry of Habitat, Urbanism, and Environment Government GEF Focal Area Climate Change Taxonomy Biodiversity, Biomes, Climate Change, Climate Change Adaptation, Focal Areas, Sustainable Land Management, Land Degradation, Land Degradation Neutrality, Private Sector, Type of Engagement, Civil Society, Stakeholders, Communications, Gender Mainstreaming, Gender Equality, Gender results areas, Food Security in Sub-Sahara Africa, Integrated Programs, Sustainable Cities, Capacity, Knowledge and Research, Knowledge Generation, Food Security, Land Productivity, Income Generating Activities, Community-Based Natural Resource Management, Sustainable Livelihoods, Sustainable Agriculture, Improved Soil and Water Management Techniques, Ecosystem Approach, Drought Mitigation, Wetlands, Least Developed Countries, Livelihoods, Mainstreaming adaptation, Climate resilience, Community-based adaptation, Ecosystem-based Adaptation, Beneficiaries, Participation, Information Dissemination, Consultation, Behavior change, Awareness Raising, Public Campaigns, SMEs, Community Based
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment of Local Peace Committees
    PROMISING RESILIENCE PRACTICES Community Conversations in Dikhil cluster, Djibouti 2012. Credit: CEWARN Creation of Peace Committees for Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution (CPMR) Introduction This conflict resolution mechanism has proved its worth and The Dikhil region of Djibouti is constituted of a zone of has allowed the two nomadic pastoralist communities to cohabitation of the two major nomadic communities which coexist for centuries. are the Afars and the Issas. Conflict incidents occur regularly New phenomena have appeared in recent years: between these two communities. Much of this conflict • Theft of cattle is committed by unidentified isolated is triggered by criminal activities perpetrated by isolated individuals; individuals from these two communities. • Stolen cattle are sold quickly at markets, live or sometimes in the form of meat; Previously, cattle thieves were always identified and the • There are ambush attacks against caravans of cattle were never sold or killed. Therefore, solving such cases merchandise committed for revenge; was relatively easy. A traditional inter-community conflict • Rape of women and girls is committed by unidentified resolution mechanism has been practiced for a long time. individuals. Because of the changing context, traditional conflict resolution Results mechanisms are becoming less effective at litigation. The work of CEWERU and the Prefecture of Dikhil has Resolution of the crimes is often complicated by the ability drastically reduced the number of intercommunal incidents. of the perpetrators to move across the border with Ethiopia. Since 2009, no fatal incident has occurred. With the support of CEWARN, CEWERU provided regular support to CPMR for A large amount of Dikhil Prefecture’s time and resources are government institutions and civil society actors principally devoted to resolving disputes and conflicts between these from the community-level.
    [Show full text]
  • Europeiska Kommissionen
    EUROPEISKA KOMMISSIONEN BRYSSEL DEN 22.7.2011 ALLMÄNNA BUDGETEN - BUDGETÅRET 2011 AVSNITT III - KOMMISSIONEN AVDELNINGARNA 23, 40 ANSLAGSÖVERFÖRING NR DEC 31/2011 euro MEDLEN ÖVERFÖRS FRÅN KAPITEL - 4002 Reserver för åtgärdsanslag ARTIKEL - 40 02 42 Reserv för katastrofbistånd Åtag.bem. - 100 000 000 Bet.bem. - 50 000 000 MEDLEN ÖVERFÖRS TILL KAPITEL - 2302 Humanitärt bistånd, inklusive stöd till befolkningsgrupper som tvingats lämna sin hembygd, livsmedelsbistånd och katastrofberedskap ARTIKEL – 23 02 01 Humanitärt bistånd Åtag.bem. 55 000 000 Bet.bem. 27 500 000 ARTIKEL – 23 02 02 Livsmedelsbistånd Åtag.bem. 45 000 000 Bet.bem. 22 500 000 SV 1 SV I. UPPGIFTER OM DEN RUBRIK TILL VILKEN MEDEL SKA ÖVERFÖRAS I.A a) Rubrik 23 02 01 - Humanitärt bistånd b) Belopp per den 18.7.2011 Åtag.bem. Bet.bem. 1A. Anslag för budgetåret (urspr. anslag + ÄB) 536 708 000 511 042 085 1B. Anslag för budgetåret (Efta) 0 0 2. Överföringar 130 000 000 72 500 000 3. Slutliga anslag för budgetåret (1A+1B+2) 666 708 000 583 542 085 4. Genomförande av budgetårets slutliga anslag 610 370 000 374 869 589 5. Outnyttjade/disponibla anslag (3-4) 56 338 000 208 672 496 6. Behov fram till budgetårets slut 111 338 000 236 172 496 7. Begärd ökning 55 000 000 27 500 000 8. Ökning i procent av de anslag som ursprungligen förts upp i 10,25 % 5,38 % budgeten (7/1A) 9. Summan av de överföringar till rubriken som skett på ej tillämpligt ej tillämpligt grundval av artikel 23.1 b och c i budgetförordningen, beräknade enligt artikel 17a i genomförandebestämmelserna, i procent av de slutliga anslagen för budgetåret c) Inkomster från återbetalda belopp (överförda mellan budgetår)(C5) Åtag.bem.
    [Show full text]
  • (IPC Phase 5) Continues in South Sudan, Yemen, and Somalia
    EAST AFRICA Food Security Outlook February to September 2017 Elevated risk of Famine (IPC Phase 5) continues in South Sudan, Yemen, and Somalia KEY MESSAGES Projected food security outcomes, February to May 2017 In January, the South Sudan IPC Technical Working Group (TWG) raised concerns that Famine (IPC Phase 5) could be ongoing in parts of central Unity. Upon reviewing the analysis, the IPC’s Emergency Review Committee (ERC) concluded that while available evidence was insufficient to make a Famine determination following IPC protocols, Famine (IPC Phase 5) was likely occurring in Leer, possibly occurring in Koch, and that humanitarian assistance was preventing Famine (IPC Phase 5) in Mayendit. Based on these ERC conclusions, the South Sudan TWG declared that Famine (IPC Phase 5) was the most likely outcome in Leer and Mayendit during the February-July period. Yemen continues to face the largest food security emergency in the world, with large populations in Crisis (IPC Phase 3) or Emergency (IPC Phase 4) acute food insecurity, the latter of which is associated with an increased risk of excess mortality. In a worst-case scenario, where food imports drop Source: FEWS NET significantly below requirement levels or where conflict Projected food security outcomes, June to September 2017 prevents trade and humanitarian access to populations for an extended period of time, Famine (IPC Phase 5) is possible. Large areas of Somalia, southeastern Ethiopia, and northeastern Kenya are expected to be in Crisis (IPC Phase 3) between February and September 2017, with some areas of Somalia in Emergency (IPC Phase 4), due to impacts of drought in 2016 on agriculture and livestock.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Internal Ex-Post Evaluation for Development Planning
    Internal Ex-Post Evaluation for Development Planning Project conducted by Djibouti Representative Office: November, 2018 Country Name The Master Plan Study Project for Sustainable Irrigation and Farming in Southern Djibouti Republic of Djibouti I. Project Outline Djibouti was a typical nation depending on transit trade economy, of which service sector such as intermediate trading, service activities at Djibouti port and others covered the large part of Djibouti’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Because of its severe natural condition, its GDP from primary industry sector, agricultural production, was quite small. Thus, a rate of the food self-sufficiency was very low and most of food for the population depended on imports from outside. More than half of local population depended mainly on animal husbandry, however, the number of livestocks decreased partly due to the effects of climate change and the severe droughts which had caused the reduction of natural pastures in the grazing land. Thus, many livelihoods of pastoral people were Background supported by labor workings of family members such as works at the port in Djibouti City. Its chance and income of labor working, therefore, were not stable. In order to cope with these severe situations, the Government of Djibouti set a policy that livelihood of the local pastoral people should be improved through agricultural activities. Accordingly, the Ministry of Agriculture, Water, Fisheries, Livestock and Marine Resources (MAEPE-RH) instructed the project formation of irrigation and agriculture development in southern regions where water resources for agriculture products were not abundant with limited agricultural technology. Therefore, it was urgently needed to establish and develop sustainable irrigation farming by obtaining stable water resources and establishing farming system applicable to the local condition.
    [Show full text]
  • International Migrants Day Consultation on the Impact Of
    No. 03 | December-January 2017 Photo caption © IOM 2016 International Migrants Day The International Organization for Migration (IOM) in collaboration with the University of Visit http://iamamigrant.org/ Djibouti organized a debate on the topic of Migration "Towards better management and protection of migrants" to commemorate the International Migrants Day on the 18th December. From 12-14 December, IOM Djibouti held a training on Psychosocial Assistance to The risks and impacts of migration are multiple and must be publicly debated through Vulnerable Migrants in total 10 IOM staff and awareness-raising sessions. During this debate, academics, as well as many students were CSOs have been trained. able to exchange views on the subject and increased therefore their awareness on the risks of Irregular migration and the importance of protecting migrants. Within the Global Migration Film Festival and the IOM’s 65th anniversary, the short film “Wallah Je te Jure” was screened during the conference organized at the University of Djibouti. In addition to the participation of IOM, this discussion was led by authors on the theme of Migration and Teacher-Researchers namely: Dr Hibo Moumin, Director of the Researcher Center of the University; Mr Rachid Hachi and Ms Farhiya Djama, authors and Dr Amina Said Chiré and Dr Abdi Houssein, Teacher-Researcher. Consultation on the impact of irregular migration with the Community Leaders in Dikhil Region IOM Djibouti in collaboration with Dikhil Prefecture organized on 14 December 2016, a consultation session with community leaders from the Dikhil region on the impact of irregular migration. The aim of this consultation session with community leaders was to assess the impact of migration in the Dikhil region and to raise awareness of the human rights of migrants and their communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Igad Bi-Annual Meeting on Food Security and Nutrition
    IGAD BI-ANNUAL MEETING ON FOOD SECURITY AND NUTRITION Report June 2020 Source: USAID About IFRAH IGAD Food Security, Nutrition and Resilience Analysis Hub (IFRAH) integrates some of the existing food security and resilience units already existing within IGAD. These include the Food Security and Nutrition Working Group (FSNWG), Resilience Analysis Unit (RAU) and Integrated Phase Classification (IPC). The rationale for this is the need to harness the interlinkages and synergies of the FSNWG, RAU and IPC analyses along with those of IGAD Specialised Institutions such as IGAD Climate Prediction and Applications Centre (ICPAC), IGAD Conflict Early Warning and Response Mechanism (CEWARN) and IGAD Centre for Pastoral Areas and Livestock Development (ICPALD) as a basis for an early warning system that can trigger early action and prevent emergencies. The goal of IFRAH is to contribute to efforts by IGAD and Member States to achieve strengthened analytical capacities and institutional mechanisms needed to support decision making processes on food security, nutrition and resilience in the IGAD Region. Thus IFRAH seeks to bring together information on food security, nutrition, conflict, climate shocks including climate change, displacement, market access and prices, human, animal and plant health among others, from a range of relevant sources to inform decision making and support the building of resilience to shocks in the region. IGAD Bi-annual Meeting on Food Security and Nutrition CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND............................................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal to the International Community Desert Locust Invasion in Republic
    DESERT LOCUST INVASION IN REPUBLIC OF DJIBOUTI Appeal to the international community Desert Locust Invasion in Republic of Djibouti MONTH DJIBOUTI Crédit photo : FAO 1 MAEPE-RH DESERT LOCUST INVASION IN REPUBLIC OF DJIBOUTI INTRODUCTION Food insecurity (reference to the IPC results, March 2019) in the Republic of Djibouti (RoD), is a serious concern, with about 280,000 people (29% of the total population) suffering from chronic food insecurity (CFI) across the country. The most severely affected areas are the Obock region in the North, the Ali-Sabieh and Dikhil regions in the South, with 30%, 25% and 20% of the rural population at severe CFI level, respectively. This food insecurity situation has been recently exacerbated by the Desert Locust (DL) invasion triggered by the high abnormal humidity since the floods of November 2019, which caused damages that further threatens the food security of more than 26 700 people (4,450 households) among the population living in the affected rural areas (70% of the population engaged in agropastoral activities). The Government of the RoD estimates that the damage caused by the DL infestations on vegetation cover (crops and pastures) have already caused a loss of around USD 5 million for the six regions of the country (Arta, Dikhil, Ali-Sabieh, Tadjourah, Obock and the Djibouti-City Suburb Areas - see Table 1). Indeed, while the bulletin issued on 4 December 2019 by FAO's locust watch unit indicated that DL swarms were to strike the RoD, a report from the field already indicated a presence of DLs between 2 and 5 December 2019 in Dikhil region (As-Eyla, Hanlé, Dikhil periurban areas, Mouloud), and Ali-Sabieh region (Assamo).
    [Show full text]
  • Flash Appeal Total Population People in Need People Targeted Requirements # Humanitarian of Djibouti (Us$) Partners
    DECEMBER 2019 - MARCH 2020 FLASH 2019-2020 APPEAL DECEMBER 2019 - MARCH 2020 DJIBOUTI 01 DJIBOUTI FLASH APPEAL TOTAL POPULATION PEOPLE IN NEED PEOPLE TARGETED REQUIREMENTS # HUMANITARIAN OF DJIBOUTI (US$) PARTNERS 960K 150K 150K 14.3M 13 Alaili Dadda OBOCK Dorra Obock TADJOURAH Randa Balha 2 Tadjourah DJIBOUTI YobokiI ARTA DILKHIL ALI SABEH Dilkhil Ali Sabeh As Eyla This document is produced by the office of the United Nations Resident Coordinator for Djibouti on behalf of humanitarian partners in support of the Government of Djibouti’s national emergency response plan. It covers the period from December 2019 to March 2020 and is issued on 11 December 2019. The Government will lead a Post Disaster Needs Assessment that will guide the longer-term resilience and development programmes needed to support Djibouti to recover from the effects of the floods. DECEMBER 2019 - MARCH 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE FLASH APPEAL AT A GLANCE 04 OVERVIEW OF THE CRISIS 05 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES 07 OPERATIONAL CAPACITY AND ACCESS 08 SECTOR RESPONSE STRATEGY 09 HEALTH AND NUTRITION 10 WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE 12 3 EDUCATION 14 MULTISECTORAL: FOOD SECURITY & LIVELIHOOD; NON-FOOD ITEMS & SHELTER 16 COORDINATION 19 DJIBOUTI FLASH APPEAL THE FLASH APPEAL AT A GLANCE PEOPLE IN NEED AND TARGETED BY SECTOR NUMBER OF PARTNERS PEOPLE IN NEED 150K 150K People in need People targeted 135K INGOs 120K 120K 2 150k 113K 13 NNGOs 3 8 UN 72K partners PEOPLE TARGETED 58K 58K 20K 150k 13K 13K Health & Food security & WASH NFIs Shelter Education REQUIREMENTS Nutrition livelihoods
    [Show full text]