Download/Print the Study in PDF Format

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download/Print the Study in PDF Format PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN RUSSIA 4th March 2012 European Elections monitor Presidential Election Russia, an unsurprising election from Corinne Deloy translated by Helen Levy On 24th September 2011 Russian Prime Minister, Vladimir Putin (United Russia, ER) said he wanted Dmitry Medvedev to lead United Russia’s list in the general elections that took place on 4th De- cember last, and then Dmitry Medvedev said he was going to support the outgoing Prime Minister’s bid in the presidential election on 4th March 2012, with Vladimir Putin promising to grant the post ANALYSIS of Prime Minister to Dmitry Medvedev when he was elected head of State. “In no uncertain terms 1 month before I want to say that we came to an agreement some years ago about what we would do,” declared the poll Vladimir Putin. Russia’s main leaders have therefore decided to exchange posts, a tactic, that ac- cording to the polls, deeply displeased many Russians. “We have not seen behaviour like this since Stalin and his personality cult,” declared political expert Gleb Pavlovsky. “The elections have never been turned into a farce like this,” maintains Stanislas Belkovsky, the founder and director of the National Strategy Institute and the communication company Politech. Nothing will be at stake therefore in the presidential election on 4th March next, since victory for Vladimir Putin seems already to have been decided. Some issues remain however: will the outgoing Prime Minister be elected in the first round? And above all what will happen after the election? General Elections under Challenge and sometimes the tension is high between the leaders of the various movements. The demonstrations rallied On 4th December 2011 Dmitry Medvedev’s and Prime those close to the far left, communists, liberals, natio- Minister Vladimir Putin’s party, United Russia (ER) won nalists, those fighting corruption, like blogger Alexey the general elections taking 49.32% of the vote, i.e. Navalny, to whom we owe the expression “a party of 238 of the 450 seats in the Duma, the lower chamber thieves and con-men” (partiya vorov i zhulikov)” given of Parliament. These were the weakest results ever re- to United Russia; Navalny was also the creator of the corded by ER. Moreover their announcement was the community web site in 2010 RosPil (pillage of Russia), source of great anger on the part of some of the popu- which condemns the embezzlement of public goods and lation who denounced electoral fraud. This was accom- corruption. This is said to represent some $300 billion, panied by a strong movement of protest, the strongest i.e. one third of the State’s budget. Navalny became since Putin took power in 2000. famous by revealing the financial embezzlement that On 10th December around 50,000 people demons- the VTB, an 85% State-owned bank was undertaking trated, with a white ribbon in their buttonhole (Bela- – likewise Transneft, the company that has a monopoly tenta) in Bolotnaya Square in Moscow demanding the over the oil-pipelines, accused of stealing €2.9 billion cancellation of the election. On 24th December again during the building of the Siberia-Pacific pipeline. On 85,000 turned out to demonstrate in Andrey Sakharov 5th December the blogger was arrested by the police Ave against the electoral fraud that took place on 4th and imprisoned for two weeks. Agreement seems to be December and the arrests and the sentencing of some impossible between the liberals, nationalists and even demonstrators to firm prison sentences – they also de- the communists and no leader has really emerged from manded Vladimir Putin’s resignation. The movement this protest movement. The politicians present in the spread to the provinces, a rare event in Russia: St Pe- demonstrations also irritated the crowd. tersburg, Gorno-Altaysk, Novosibirsk, Yekaterinburg, “The lack of a political figure behind whom the mo- Chelyabinsk, Kazan, Perm, Nizhniy Novgorod, Bryansk vement might rally is its greatest weakness and yet and Arkhangelsk. its greatest strength,” says political expert Andrey Opposition to Vladimir Putin’s regime is quite diverse Grachev, former spokesperson (1990-1991) of the Se- Political issues FONDATION ROBERT SCHUMAN / PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN RUSSIA / 4TH MARCH 2012 Presidential election in Russia 4th March 2012 cretary General of the Central Committee of the Com- on 16th December. Indeed the Russians seem to have munist Party of the Soviet Union (1985-1991) Mikhail freed themselves from a certain kind of fear. Moreo- Gorbachev during perestroika. ver electoral fraud is not the only cause of discontent On 31st January around fifty opponents, including and the only reason for bringing demonstrators out 02 Eduard Limonov, who was excluded from the presi- on the street. The Russian middle class, that is rising dential race, were arrested during a demonstration rapidly, is increasingly expressing its discontent with that had not been given permission to rally in Moscow the regime in office, whose inefficacy and corruption it (on 31st of each month, of those which have 31 days, criticises. This was a factor that enabled the Commu- a demonstration is organised to defend article 31 of nist Party (KPRF) and Fair Russia (SR) to improve their the Constitution that guarantees the freedom to as- results in the general elections (the two parties won semble). On 1st February a 140m2 banner bearing the 19.19% and 13.24% of the vote respectively, i.e. 92 slogan “Putin, get out” and a caricature of the Prime and 64 seats in the Duma). United Russia came second Minister, who had been crossed out in black, was atta- and even third in several towns. And so it won 21% of ched to a building just opposite the Kremlin on a quay the vote in Dubna (48% in the previous general elec- next to the Moskva. Another demonstration took place tion on 2nd December 2007) and 22% in Korolev, the on 4th February between October Square and Bolot- town in which the Space Agency has its flight control naya Square. centre (59% four years ago). According to a poll undertaken by the Levada Centre, “The general elections on 4th December 2011 did not and published at the end of December 2011, three respect electoral standards,” declared the Organisation quarters of the Russians (73%) say they are dissatis- for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) whose fied with the government’s policy “There is an enor- mission it was to observe the election. It witnessed mous problem of legitimacy. This movement is carried various infringements (ballot stuffing, multiple voting, along by people who are not politicised,” stresses etc.) and deplored the hundreds of arrests of opposi- Carine Clément, director of the Collective Action Ins- tion militants who wanted to demonstrate on the day. titute in Moscow, adding “it is a question of making Moreover many videos showing massive infringement this movement last and politicising it, of transforming operations were put on-line and seen by millions of offended dignity into sustainable commitment, eve- Russians. “What we saw on the TV never existed in rywhere in Russia.” “The ruling power is now in an the past” maintained journalist Yulia Latynina. The historical dead-end, it insists on provoking and discre- internet penetration rate in Russia is 46%, so 52.9 diting the organisers of the demonstrations but above million people have access to the world web at least all it is preparing its vengeance,” says Andrey Illaryo- once a month. Another new phenomenon was the res- nov, chairman of the Economic Analysis Institute. With ponse given by Patriarch Kirill of the Orthodox Church, his back to the wall, Vladimir Putin has one alternative: who defended the demonstrators, whom he said were step up the authoritarian tendencies of his regime or “acting in legitimate protest” against the corruption accept the pluralisation of the political arena. For the of the elites. Finally, Mikhail Gorbachev declared his time being he has not ruled out reserving some go- “shame” of having supported Vladimir Putin in 2000 vernment posts for the opposition after his victory on and said “I would advise Mr Putin to leave now.” 4th March next. “I have already said that I had invited the leaders of the parties deemed as being the oppo- The Prime Minister has said that polling stations will sition to participate, for example Fair Cause (PD) and be equipped with cameras on 4thMarch. “The latter Yabloko. These people have worked and continue to will not enable the filming of the counting process, work effectively and I do not see anything impossible the recording of the results and the conditions of their in that,” he maintained. storage,” stresses Heidi Tagliavini, head of the OSCE’s Russian observation mission. Vladimir Putin counter attacks Although Putin is far from having been ousted from “The general elections are over. Discussion over revi- power, his relationship with the Russian people has sing the results is out of the question,” this was the changed. “The myth of the omnipotent Vladimir Putin response Putin gave to demonstrators. “In my opinion has collapsed,” said a blogger on radio “Moscow Echo” the election results undeniably reflect public opinion,” Political issues FONDATION ROBERT SCHUMAN / GENERAL ELECTIONS IN RUSSIA / 4TH DECEMBER 2011 Presidential election in Russia 4th March 2012 he added. As usual he accused the demonstrators of its 2011 annual report and believed that fraud totalled “having a Russian passport” but of working for “a fo- 718.5 billion roubles (€17.8 billion), a record sum since reign power and enjoying funding from abroad.” He the 20th century. Vladimir Putin said that doing away stressed that “the opposition is leading Russia into with kickback payments on State orders would lead to 03 chaos.” savings of “between 5% to 10% of the federal budget, Vladimir Putin attempted to analyse the situation.
Recommended publications
  • The Pennsylvania United Nations Conference
    PUNC X: THE PENNSYLVANIA UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE Table of Contents Letter from the Crisis Director Page 2 Letter from the Chair Page 3 Background Page 4 Russia Since 2016 – Notable Events Page 5 Delegate Positions Page 7 Committee Structure Page 10 Committee Goals Page 11 Sources Page 11 1 PUNC X: THE PENNSYLVANIA UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE Delegates, My name is Milan Liu and I’ll be serving as your crisis director for the Russian Unity Conference 2020 at PUNC X. I’m a freshman at Penn State, pursuing a double major in International Politics and Geography, as well as minors in Chinese and Global Security. In addition to my love for international affairs and maps, I enjoy horseback riding, traveling, and binge-watching political dramas on Netflix. I have been involved in Model UN since my sophomore year of high school, and attended conferences at Penn State twice. I joined PSIADA last semester, and had the pleasure of crisis directing the Antarctic Treaty 2038 committee at PHUNC, Penn State’s high school Model UN conference, in the fall. I have always looked forward to Model UN conferences, and PUNC X is no exception. I’m excited to see the creativity of this group of delegates, and how you respond to the challenges Russia will face throughout the weekend. Feel free to reach out with any questions or concerns, and I’ll be happy to help in any way I can. Best, Milan [email protected] 2 PUNC X: THE PENNSYLVANIA UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE Delegates, Hello everyone! My name is Robert Liu and I am excited to be your Chair for Russian Unity Conference 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's 2012 Presidential Election
    Russia’s 2012 Presidential Election: Yet Another Term for Putin? By Paweł Piotr Styrna l February 27, 2012 The next presidential election in post-Soviet Russia is scheduled for March 4, 2012. The roster of candidates Russian voters can choose from is rather limited, both in terms of the number of candidates and their backgrounds. The upcoming contest pits five candidates against each other: the Sovietonostalgic chekist, Vladimir Putin; the unreconstructed and unrepentant communist, Gennady Zyuganov; the socialist - and long-time Chairman of the Federation Council (Russia’s upper house) - Sergey Mironov, the nominee of the “Just Russia” Party; the infamous, rabid chauvinist, Vladimir Zhirinovsky; and the “independent” oligarch, Mikhail Prokhorov. Not surprisingly, all these men embody different, yet often overlapping, facets of post-communism. One will notice the conspicuous and telling absence of a conservative, Christian, anti-communist alternative of the Alexander Solzhenitsyn variety. This seems to correspond with what some have argued to constitute one of the essential features of post-communism (particularly in the former USSR), i.e. an ostensible political pluralism serving as a façade, disguising an establishment jealously guarding the post-communist status quo, and attempting to marginalize threats to it. Thus, the faux pluralism appears designed to cater to multiple ideological persuasions in society without jeopardizing the main continuities between communism-proper and post-communism, not to mention the privileges, perks, and golden parachutes retained or acquired by the post-communist oligarchy. This is not to claim that the post-bolshevik establishment is a monolith or that no spheres of freedom exist, but that these are significantly limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Soviet Political Party Development in Russia: Obstacles to Democratic Consolidation
    POST-SOVIET POLITICAL PARTY DEVELOPMENT IN RUSSIA: OBSTACLES TO DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION Evguenia Lenkevitch Bachelor of Arts (Honours), SFU 2005 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS In the Department of Political Science O Evguenia Lenkevitch 2007 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY 2007 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: Evguenia Lenkevitch Degree: Master of Arts, Department of Political Science Title of Thesis: Post-Soviet Political Party Development in Russia: Obstacles to Democratic Consolidation Examining Committee: Chair: Dr. Lynda Erickson, Professor Department of Political Science Dr. Lenard Cohen, Professor Senior Supervisor Department of Political Science Dr. Alexander Moens, Professor Supervisor Department of Political Science Dr. llya Vinkovetsky, Assistant Professor External Examiner Department of History Date DefendedlApproved: August loth,2007 The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project or extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. The author has further granted permission to Simon Fraser University to keep or make a digital copy for use in its circulating collection (currently available to the public at the 'Institutional Repository" link of the SFU Library website <www.lib.sfu.ca> at: <http://ir.lib.sfu.ca/handle/1892/112>) and, without changing the content, to translate the thesis/project or extended essays, if technically possible, to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation of the digital work.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Intelligence
    N°70 - January 31 2008 Published every two weeks / International Edition CONTENTS SPOTLIGHT P. 1-3 Politics & Government c Medvedev’s Last Battle Before Kremlin Debut SPOTLIGHT c Medvedev’s Last Battle The arrest of Semyon Mogilevich in Moscow on Jan. 23 is a considerable development on Russia’s cur- Before Kremlin Debut rent political landscape. His profile is altogether singular: linked to a crime gang known as “solntsevo” and PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS sought in the United States for money-laundering and fraud, Mogilevich lived an apparently peaceful exis- c Final Stretch for tence in Moscow in the renowned Rublyovka road residential neighborhood in which government figures « Operation Succession » and businessmen rub shoulders. In truth, however, he was involved in at least two types of business. One c Kirillov, Shestakov, was the sale of perfume and cosmetic goods through the firm Arbat Prestige, whose manager and leading Potekhin: the New St. “official” shareholder is Vladimir Nekrasov who was arrested at the same time as Mogilevich as the two left Petersburg Crew in Moscow a restaurant at which they had lunched. The charge that led to their incarceration was evading taxes worth DIPLOMACY around 1.5 million euros and involving companies linked to Arbat Prestige. c Balkans : Putin’s Gets His Revenge The other business to which Mogilevich’s name has been linked since at least 2003 concerns trading in P. 4-7 Business & Networks gas. As Russia Intelligence regularly reported in previous issues, Mogilevich was reportedly the driving force behind the creation of two commercial entities that played a leading role in gas relations between Russia, BEHIND THE SCENE Turkmenistan and Ukraine: EuralTransGaz first and then RosUkrEnergo later.
    [Show full text]
  • Putin's Nationalist Challenge
    Conflict Studies Research Centre Russian Series 05/20 Putin's Nationalist Challenge Dr Mark A Smith Executive Summary * Putin is increasingly dominating the political system, which is becoming more authoritarian. * Administrative reform has been implemented in order to streamline the state with limited success. Three key issues: * Could "mild authoritarianism" be replaced by a harsher form of rule? * What will happen in 2008, when the next presidential elections are scheduled, and Putin will be constitutionally obliged to step down? * Could the scenario of the "orange revolution" in Ukraine be repeated in Russia? * There is now a strong possibility that Putin may either attempt to stay in power after his second term expires in 2008, or attempt to create an interim leadership from 2008 to 2012, and then return to power. * Any post-2008 leadership is likely to be more nationalist and authoritarian. 05/20 Putin's Nationalist Challenge Dr Mark A Smith The Russian political system has been going through a process of subtle evolution since Vladimir Putin was first elected president in 2000. In 2000, major changes were made to the structure of centre-regional relations: • Putin created seven federal districts, headed by a plenipotentiary representative, appointed by the president, and solely accountable to him. The plenipotentiary representative’s main task is to ensure that federal government policy is being carried out by the regional leaderships. During the Yel’tsin period, many regional leaders had often ignored federal law, and elevated regional law above it. • The regional leaders were removed from the upper house of the Russian parliament, the Federation Council, and the president acquired the legal power to dismiss regional governors who defied federal law.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media and Civil Society in the Russian Protests, December 2011
    Department of Informatics and Media Social Science – major in Media and Communication Studies Fall 2013 Master Two Years Thesis Social Media and Civil Society in the Russian Protests, December 2011 The role of social media in engagement of people in the protests and their self- identification with civil society Daria Dmitrieva Fall 2013 Supervisor: Dr. Gregory Simons Researcher at Uppsala Centre for Russian and Eurasian Studies 1 2 ABSTRACT The study examines the phenomenon of the December protests in Russia when thousands of citizens were involved in the protest movement after the frauds during the Parliamentary elections. There was a popular opinion in the Internet media that at that moment Russia experienced establishment of civil society, since so many people were ready to express their discontent publically for the first time in 20 years. The focus of this study is made on the analysis of the roles that social media played in the protest movement. As it could be observed at the first glance, recruiting and mobilising individuals to participation in the rallies were mainly conducted via social media. The research analyses the concept of civil society and its relevance to the protest rhetoric and investigates, whether there was a phenomenon of civil society indeed and how it was connected to individuals‘ motivation for joining the protest. The concept of civil society is discussed through the social capital, social and political trust, e- democracy and mediatisation frameworks. The study provides a comprehensive description of the events, based on mainstream and new media sources, in order to depict the nature and the development of the movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Intelligence N°66 of November 22 2007) and About Whom Legal Char- the Hatchet Ges Are Never Ending
    N°67 - December 6 2007 Published every two weeks / International Edition CONTENTS KREMLIN P. 1-3 Politics & Government c KREMLIN Half-tinted election triumph c Half-tinted election triumph Election No, it wasn’t a resounding victory... Taking into account the means deployed, the multitude LEGISLATIVE ELECTIONS Special of manipulations practice throughout the country abouty the level of participation and the c The Winers and losers of on the number of votes obtained by United Russia, the score of 64% in favour of the presi- December 2 dential party (and therefore Vladimir Putin), it could not be completely satisfactory for the Kremlin. It is ALERT far from the standard of 70% that many of those close to the President had announced as probable and so c Yevgeny Shkolov, or the it is natural that Vladimir Putin expressed his displeasure with these results and that he did not even see "Dresden connection" in the fit to visit the headquarters of United Russia Sunday night. Interior ministry FOCUS Also, this result does nothing to ease the embarassment that the Kremlin finds itself in concerning the c The strange confession by process of succession of Vladimir Putin. Even if it consecrates the pre-eminence of United Russia in the Oleg Shwartzman Duma (it passes from 305 to 315 seats), even if it confirms the popularity of Vladimir Putin with a majority BEHIND THE SCENE of Russians, this election changes nothing fundamental. It justifies the fact that Vladimir Putin can be des- c Vladimir Zhirinovsky : the little secrets behind an elec- ignated as Prime minister (but we hardly had any doubts about the fact that this could be technically pos- tion list sible), it could provide a basis for the creation of a status of “national leader” but it cannot hide the inter- nal contradiction in which the elites still find themselves : that Putin leaves the Kremlin while still remaining P.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Rural Politics in Post- Socialist Settings
    RETHINKING RURAL POLITICS IN POST- SOCIALIST SETTINGS Natalia Vitalyevna Mamonova 505017-L-bw-Mamanova Processed on: 6-9-2016 This dissertation is part of the project: ‘Land Grabbing in Russia: Large-Scale Inves- tors and Post-Soviet Rural Communities’ funded by the European Research Coun- cil (ERC), grant number 313781. It also benefitted from funding provided by the Netherlands Academie on Land Governance for Equitable and Sustainable Devel- opment (LANDac), the Land Deal Politics Initiative (LDPI), the Political Economy of Resources, Environment and Population (PER) research group of the Interna- tional Institute of Social Studies (ISS). This dissertation is part of the research pro- gramme of CERES, Research School for Resource Studies for Development. © Natalia Vitalyevna Mamonova 2016 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the author. The cover image ‘Land grabbing in former Soviet Eurasia’ (2013) is an original water colour painting by the author, which was initially made for the cover page of the Journal of Peasant Studies Vol. 40, issue 3-4, 2013. ISBN 978-90-6490-064-8 Ipskamp Drukkers BV Auke Vleerstraat 145 7547 PH Enschede Tel.: 053 482 62 62 www.ipskampdrukkers.nl 505017-L-bw-Mamanova Processed on: 6-9-2016 RETHINKING RURAL POLITICS IN POST- SOCIALIST SETTINGS Rural Communities, Land Grabbing and Agrarian Change in Russia and Ukraine HEROVERWEGING VAN PLATTELANDSPOLITIEK IN POSTSOCIALISTISCHE OMGEVINGEN PLATTELANDSGEMEESCHAPPEN, LANDJEPIK EN AGRARISCHE TRANSFORMATIE IN RUSLAND EN OEKRAÏNE Thesis To obtain the degree of Doctor from the Erasmus University Rotterdam by command of the Rector Magnificus Professor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Vertikal: the Tandem, Power and the Elections
    Russia and Eurasia Programme Paper REP 2011/01 The Russian Vertikal: the Tandem, Power and the Elections Andrew Monaghan Nato Defence College June 2011 The views expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of Chatham House, its staff, associates or Council. Chatham House is independent and owes no allegiance to any government or to any political body. It does not take institutional positions on policy issues. This document is issued on the understanding that if any extract is used, the author(s)/ speaker(s) and Chatham House should be credited, preferably with the date of the publication. REP Programme Paper. The Russian Vertikal: the Tandem, Power and the Elections Introduction From among many important potential questions about developments in Russian politics and in Russia more broadly, one has emerged to dominate public policy and media discussion: who will be Russian president in 2012? This is the central point from which a series of other questions and debates cascade – the extent of differences between President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and how long their ‘Tandem’ can last, whether the presidential election campaign has already begun and whether they will run against each other being only the most prominent. Such questions are typically debated against a wider conceptual canvas – the prospects for change in Russia. Some believe that 2012 offers a potential turning point for Russia and its relations with the international community: leading to either the return of a more ‘reactionary’ Putin to the Kremlin, and the maintenance of ‘stability’, or another term for the more ‘modernizing’ and ‘liberal’ Medvedev.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Groups, Individuals, Strategies and Prospects the Russia Studies Centre at the Henry Jackson Society
    The Russian Opposition: A Survey of Groups, Individuals, Strategies and Prospects The Russia Studies Centre at the Henry Jackson Society By Julia Pettengill Foreword by Chris Bryant MP 1 First published in 2012 by The Henry Jackson Society The Henry Jackson Society 8th Floor – Parker Tower, 43-49 Parker Street, London, WC2B 5PS Tel: 020 7340 4520 www.henryjacksonsociety.org © The Henry Jackson Society, 2012 All rights reserved The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and are not necessarily indicative of those of The Henry Jackson Society or its directors Designed by Genium, www.geniumcreative.com ISBN 978-1-909035-01-0 2 About The Henry Jackson Society The Henry Jackson Society: A cross-partisan, British think-tank. Our founders and supporters are united by a common interest in fostering a strong British, European and American commitment towards freedom, liberty, constitutional democracy, human rights, governmental and institutional reform and a robust foreign, security and defence policy and transatlantic alliance. The Henry Jackson Society is a company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales under company number 07465741 and a charity registered in England and Wales under registered charity number 1140489. For more information about Henry Jackson Society activities, our research programme and public events please see www.henryjacksonsociety.org. 3 CONTENTS Foreword by Chris Bryant MP 5 About the Author 6 About the Russia Studies Centre 6 Acknowledgements 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 INTRODUCTION 11 CHAPTER
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Political, Economic, and Security Issues and U.S
    Russian Political, Economic, and Security Issues and U.S. Interests Jim Nichol, Coordinator Specialist in Russian and Eurasian Affairs November 4, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33407 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Russian Political, Economic, and Security Issues and U.S. Interests Summary Russia made some uneven progress in democratization during the 1990s, but according to most observers, this limited progress was reversed after Vladimir Putin rose to power in 1999-2000. During this period, the State Duma (lower legislative chamber) came to be dominated by government-approved parties and opposition democratic parties were excluded. Putin also abolished gubernatorial elections and established government ownership or control over major media and industries, including the energy sector. The methods used by the Putin government to suppress insurgency in the North Caucasus demonstrated a low regard for the rule of law and scant regard for human rights, according to critics. Dmitriy Medvedev, Vladimir Putin’s chosen successor and long-time protégé, was elected president in March 2008 and immediately chose Putin as prime minister. President Medvedev has continued policies established during the Putin presidency. In August 2008, the Medvedev-Putin “tandem” directed wide-scale military operations against Georgia and unilaterally recognized the independence of Georgia’s separatist South Ossetia and Abkhazia, actions that were censured by most of the international community but which resulted in few, minor, and only temporary international sanctions against Russia. Russia’s economy began to recover from the Soviet collapse in 1999, led mainly by oil and gas exports, but the sharp decline in oil and gas prices in mid-2008 and other aspects of the global economic downturn put a halt to this growth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Policy and Diplomatic Activities of the Russian Federation in 2009
    THE FOREIGN POLICY AND DIPLOMATIC ACTIVITIES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION IN 2009 REVIEW MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, RUSSIA Moscow, March 2010 2 CONTENTS PREFACE - 3 MULTILATERAL DIPLOMACY - 7 Russia’s Participation in UN Activities - 7 Russia’s Participation in the G8, G20 and BRIC - 13 International Cooperation in Combating New Challenges and Threats - 18 Disarmament, Arms Control and Nonproliferation - 29 Conflict Resolution and Crisis Response - 38 Inter-Civilization Dialogue - 45 GEOGRAPHICAL DIRECTIONS OF FOREIGN POLICY - 47 CIS Space - 47 Europe - 60 USA and Canada - 83 Asia-Pacific Region - 90 Middle East and North Africa - 105 Africa - 107 Latin America and Caribbean - 111 ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY - 115 LEGAL SUPPORT FOR FOREIGN POLICY ACTIVITIES - 120 HUMANITARIAN FOREIGN-POLICY ORIENTATION - 128 Human Rights Issues - 128 Protecting the Interests of Overseas Compatriots - 133 Consular Work - 136 Cooperation in Culture and Science - 139 ENGAGEMENT WITH THE FEDERAL ASSEMBLY, POLITICAL PARTIES AND CIVIL SOCIETY INSTITUTIONS - 144 INTERREGIONAL AND CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION - 149 INFORMATION SUPPORT FOR FOREIGN POLICY - 153 HISTORICAL/ARCHIVAL ACTIVITIES - 155 PROVIDING SECURITY FOR OVERSEAS AGENCIES - 159 3 PREFACE International events in 2009, including the global financial/economic crisis, facilitated the emergence of a positive, unifying agenda for the world community. An ever larger number of states concluded that there is a need for collective action to tackle common tasks in economics, finance and the climate change struggle, and
    [Show full text]