CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) at AGDER ENERGI in 2016 Appendix – Total Figures for Group and by Company

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) at AGDER ENERGI in 2016 Appendix – Total Figures for Group and by Company III < > GRI index AE total by company Conversion factors CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) AT AGDER ENERGI IN 2016 Appendix – total figures for Group and by company AGDER ENERGI APPENDIX 2016 1 III < > GRI index AE total by company Conversion factors This document supplements the section on CSR in Agder Energi’s 2016 annual report, and the scope and boundaries described in that section also apply here. The appendix forms part of Agder Energi’s GRI 4 reporting. This document breaks down the joint figures for the Group by topic and company, as well as providing data for the construction of the Skjerka dams and Hodna substation, two of Agder Energi’s major projects in 2016. The document contains the GRI index for Agder Energi’s annual report and appendix. The appendix is only published on our website ae.no. CONTENT Click on the text to go to the page of your choice Energy 3 Impacts on biodiversity 4 Greenhouse gas emissions 5 Local pollution 6 Health, safety and the environment: our top priority 7 Employees at agder energi 8 Competition law 9 GRI index 10 General Standard Disclosures 10 Specific Standard Disclosures 11 Agder Energi vannkraft 13 Agder Energi Nett 16 Agder Energi Varme 19 Agder Energi AS 21 Agder Energi Kraftforvaltning 23 Otera Infra 24 Otera XP 26 Otera AB 27 Otera AB 28 JSC Latgales Energetika 29 UAB Baltic Hydroenergy 31 Conversion factors 33 AGDER ENERGI APPENDIX 2016 2 III < > GRI index AE total by company Conversion factors ENERGY Agder Energi’s energy generation (GWh) Source 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 Electricity generation Water 8 884,1 9 002,7 9 067,7 7 740 8 100 Solar PV 0,04 0,04 0,04 0,04 0,04 Wind power 0 0 0 0 5,4 Heating District heating 158,9 138,58 132,7 150,8 141,5 Total energy generated by Agder Energi 9 043,04 9 141,32 9 200,44 7 890,84 8 246,94 Renewable share in district heating (%), excl. electricity 99 % 95 % 91 % 83 % 79 % Data for Baltic Hydroenergy AS is inclu- The high proportion of renewable energy metres to provide cooling to the hospital, ded in the Group’s CSR reporting, but not in the district heating system mainly several large buildings in the Kvadraturen in the main section of the annual report. reflects our use of waste heat from district and Agder Energi’s head office in This explains the slight discrepancy Returkraft’s waste-to-energy plant in Kristiansand. Agder Energi is building between the energy generation figures in Kristiansand and from Glencore Nikkel- several hydroelectric power plants that the main annual report and the ones in verk. In 2016 our plant at Vesterveien will be completed over the coming years. this table. was converted to use biodiesel, so that The Group is also working on several the district heating system for central major hydroelectric projects that may The Group’s hydroelectric power stations, Kristiansand no longer uses fossil fuels. increase the Group’s renewable energy including Baltic Hydroenergy, generated Agder Energi Varme’s free cooling plant generation in the future. 8,884 GWh of electricity in 2016. uses cold sea water from a depth of 150 Agder Energi’s stationary energy consumption (GWh) Source 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 Energy consumption in buildings and other facilities Electricity 16,4 13,76 16,9 13,1 13,7 Oil 0 0 0 0 0,08 District heating and cooling 1,3 1,1 1,3 1,3 0,47 Total for buildings and other facilities 17,7 14,86 18,2 14,4 14,25 Pumping stations Elektrisitet 69,8 100,4 91 65,8 79,42 Transmission and distribution network Elektrisitetsforbruk nettap 370 390 360 369 350 Total stationary energy consumption 457,5 500,2 469,2 449,2 443,67 Agder Energi’s premises include offices, An average figure for consumption per reduction in actual energy consumption warehouses and installations for the square metre is therefore not very rele- from 115 kWh/m2 in 2015. Distribution generation and distribution of energy. vant. Energy consumption at our head losses in Agder Energi Nett’s local and They are built in accordance with building office, which was completed in 2010, was regional distribution grids came to 370 regulations at the time of construction. 111.6 kWh/m2 in 2016. This represented a GWh in 2016. AGDER ENERGI APPENDIX 2016 3 III < > GRI index AE total by company Conversion factors IMPACTS ON BIODIVERSITY Environmental impact of electric power infrastructure 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 Total number of power stations 45 45 40 36 34 Aerial cables (km) 13 566 13 520 13 500 13 477 13 442 Underground/undersea cables (km) 7 792,4 7 675 7 423 7 169 6 963 Length of district heating and cooling network (km) 75,2 71,5 69 65,8 62,2 Total km 21 433,6 21 266,5 20 992 20 712 20 467,2 Data for Baltic Hydroenergy AS is inclu- bigger impact on nature or society than is There are several reservoirs in the ded in the Group’s CSR reporting, but not usual for this kind of business. Our power Setesdal Vesthei Ryfylkeheiane protec- in the main section of the annual report. stations are not located in protected ted landscape. Agder Energi helps to This explains the slight discrepancy areas or in protected river systems. We do assess the environmental impacts of between the numbers shown in this figu- have six power stations along the River power generation, particularly at its own re and the ones in the annual report. Mandalselva, which is a national salmon power stations. Within the framework of river. Most of the Group’s more than 120 our existing licences, we are trying to Agder Energi has 45 wholly-owned and dams are situated in areas that are not reduce negative environmental impacts part-owned power stations, located in specially protected. In 2016 Agder Energi through various statutory and voluntary Vest-Agder, Aust-Agder, Telemark, Latvia Vannkraft carried out a major project to measures, such as releasing water to and Lithuania. Grid operation is not as improve a stretch of the Mandal river entice fish to swim up rivers and building such polluting, but the power cables have system, which involved removing six salmon ladders, as well as putting out an impact on the landscape, and there is a thresholds to recreate something appro- fish and roe in reservoirs. risk of birds colliding with them or suffe- aching the river’s natural state. This is ring electric shocks. Dams and power sta- considered the largest river restoration tions also change the natural environ- project of its kind in Norway. ment, but our activities do not have a Environmental impacts on biodiversity 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 Trout released 18 900 40 100 48 700 48 700 45 200 Juvenile fish released 10 000 0 0 0 100 764 Roe put out 300 000 300 000 300 000 506 000 344 764 Total 328 900 340 100 348 700 554 700 490 728 There were four breaches of the rules exploit ing more of the flow in the Otra ri- CSR – water management in 2016 governing the operation of the company’s ver system. The project, which was Agder Energi is entitled to exploit rivers dams in 2016. These rules specify the mini- completed in 2016, altered the landscape within the limits set by the rules on the mum flow needed to preserve recreation in accordance with its planning operation of its dams and its licences areas and to protect fish stocks in dammed permission. The ongoing Skjerka dam under the Water Resources Act or Water- rivers. A more detailed description is provi- project consists of building two new rock- course Regulation Act. Each licence ded under “Local pollution”. fill dams to replace five concrete dams. normally includes detailed rules on the The project is scheduled for completion in water levels of reservoirs over the course The Iveland 2 power station, which is 2018. The project involves altering the of the year and on the amount of water wholly owned by Agder Energi, is genera- landscape in accordance with its planning that must be allowed to pass by the power ting additional renewable energy by permission. station – in other words, the minimum flow. AGDER ENERGI APPENDIX 2016 4 III < > GRI index AE total by company Conversion factors In some cases more water is allowed to At Steinsfoss power station in Otra, the Some of the reservoir restrictions and pass than specified by the licence, normally flow of water past the power station is minimum flow requirements on the Mandal due to special agreements or because the regulated by a separate agreement with river system are self-imposed due to stipulations of the licence are ambiguous. Vennesla Municipality. At Byglandsfjord environmental considerations. On the Uldal In some cases Agder Energi applies the rules governing the operation of the river system there are certain self-imposed minimum flow requirements or reservoir dams refer to a salmonid fish called the reservoir restrictions in the summer, and restrictions that are stricter than required bleke, but some of the details on water we aim to avoid very low river flow in the by its licences, out of consideration for the levels during the spawning season are left Tovdalselva. environment or stakeholders along the up to the licencee Otteraaens Brugseier- river systems. forening. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Agder Energi’s greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes of CO2 equivalents) Source 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 Total for buildings and other facilities 546,7 542,2 1708,3 1116 611,6 Total for transport 2 965,6 3 270,9 1 972 3 340,6 2 687,7 Total for district heating production 715,2 1 028,5 1 114 2 489 3 955 Power grids Transmission and distribution losses 192 270 180 000 155 000 37 100 31 164 Total greenhouse gas emissions 194 380,1 197 111,6 184 794,3 161 945,6 42 205,7 Greenhouse gas emissions using European power mix 94 380,1 197 111,6 184 794,3 161 946 157 243 Greenhouse gas emissions using Norwegian power mix 7 077,1 5 139,6 Greenhouse gas emissions are calculated by the Group comes from Norwegian guarantees of origin to cover distribution by converting energy consumption and hydropower.
Recommended publications
  • Regional Planning in Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden Regional Planning in Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden
    MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT FOREST AND NATURE AGENCY SPATIAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT Working paper Regional planning in Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden Regional planning in Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden Prepared by Nordregio for Ministry of Environment Forest and Nature Agency Spatial Planning Department Denmark Printed in Denmark ISBN 87-7279-544-2 Internet Ó 2004 by the Ministry of Environment Forest and Nature Agency, Denmark All rights reserved. Published April 2004 Nordregio has been commissioned by the Danish Ministry of Environment to give a short presentation of the regional planning systems in Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. The overviews given in this paper are based on state of the art knowledge from four of the staff members at the institute and do as such not represent any research effort. The overviews, while trying to represent and discuss the same topics, differ slightly from country to country as a reflection of the variations of planning focus of the countries in question. The texts only express the opinion of their authors. Arto Ruotsalainen, Pétur Ingi Haraldsson, Jon P. Knudsen and Moa Tunström. October 2003 2 Preface This report on regional planning in Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden is required to be used in the work of the Regional Planning Committee. The Regional Planning Committee was established by the Danish Government in 2002 with an objective of giving recommendations for an improvement and simplification of the present regional planning in Denmark. For this purpose it has been appropriate to include examples from the countries around us. The Regional Planning Committee is to make a proposal to the future regional planning in Denmark, a proposal that is based on the forthcoming reform of the regional and municipal structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Manudeep Singh Bhuller Inndeling Av Norge I Arbeidsmarkedsregioner
    2009/24 Notater Manudeep Singh Bhuller Inndeling av Norge i Notaterarbeidsmarkedsregioner Forskningsavdelingen/Gruppe for offentlig økonomi 1 Innledning1 Formålet med dette arbeidet har vært å lage en inndeling av Norge i arbeidsmarkedsregioner som et alternativ til den inndelingen som foreslås i Standard for økonomiske regioner (NOS C 616) fra 2002. Mens SSBs inndeling av Norge i 90 økonomiske regioner hovedsakelig er ment som et hensiktsmessig publiseringsnivå for statistikk på et nivå mellom fylke og kommune, har den også blitt benyttet i arbeidsmarkedsanalyser (Hustoft m.fl. 1999). En svakhet ved denne inndelingen er at hver av regionene ikke tillates å inneholde områder fra mer en ett fylke. Som ledd i analyse av arbeidsmarkedet er det imidlertid ønskelig med en regional inndeling som er uavhengig av fylkesgrenser og samtidig er rimelig stabil over tid. Vi vil derfor understreke at inndelingen som foreslås i dette notatet er ment som et supple- ment til og ikke en erstatning for Standard for økonomiske regioner. Arbeidet med inndel- ingen av arbeidsmarkedsregioner er hovedsakelig basert på pendlingsstatistikk for norske kommuner for perioden 2000-2006. Datamaterialet som er brukt ligger tilgjengelig for alle på SSBs nettsted. For å operasjonalisere inndelingen for bruk i empirisk arbeid, settes det også en nedre grense på antall bosatte i hver region. Lie (2000) skiller mellom oppdelende og sammenslående prosedyrer for å danne regionale inndelinger. Ved oppdelende prosedyrer blir det en vil dele inn delt opp etter nærmere bestemte retningslinjer, basert på en teori eller idé om hva som skiller de ulike regionene fra hverandre. Inndelingsmetodene som kan kategoriseres som oppdelende begynner ofte med en identifisering av et senterhierarki basert på tettstedsstørrelse og pendlingsstrømmer.
    [Show full text]
  • Problemkartlegging Av Eutrofierte Vannforekomster I Vannområdene Gjerstad-Vegår, Nidelva Og Tovdalselva. Kunnskapsstatus Og Pr
    RAPPORT L.NR. 7405-2019 Problemkartlegging av eutrofierte vannforekomster i vannområdene Gjerstad-Vegår, Nidelva og Tovdalselva. Kunnskapsstatus og prioritering av lokaliteter for screening-undersøkelser. Tovdalselva ved Høygilt, foto Jarle Håvardstun, NIVA Norsk institutt for vannforskning RAPPORT Hovedkontor NIVA Region Sør NIVA Region Innlandet NIVA Region Vest NIVA Danmark Gaustadalléen 21 Jon Lilletuns vei 3 Sandvikaveien 59 Thormøhlensgate 53 D Njalsgade 76, 4. sal 0349 Oslo 4879 Grimstad 2312 Ottestad 5006 Bergen 2300 København S, Danmark Telefon (47) 22 18 51 00 Telefon (47) 22 18 51 00 Telefon (47) 22 18 51 00 Telefon (47) 22 18 51 00 Telefon (45) 39 17 97 33 Internett: www.niva.no Tittel Løpenummer Dato Problemkartlegging av eutrofierte vannforekomster i vannområdene 7405-2019 8.07.2019 Gjerstad-Vegår, Nidelva og Tovdalselva. Kunnskapsstatus og prioritering av lokaliteter for screening-undersøkelser. Forfatter(e) Fagområde Distribusjon Hobæk, Anders Eutrofiering Åpen Geografisk område Sider Agder 66 Oppdragsgiver(e) Oppdragsreferanse Vest-Agder fylkeskommune Tanja Øverland Utgitt av NIVA Prosjektnummer 180233 Sammendrag Rapporten sammenfatter oppdatert kunnskapsstatus for 45 vannforekomster i vannområdene Gjerstad-Vegår, Nidelva og Tovdalselva. På grunnlag av tilgjengelige data er det utarbeidet forslag til hvilke vannforekomster som prioriteres for å inngå i et screening-program (enkle undersøkelser som indikerer økologisk tilstand). Prioritering av vannforekomster for screening er basert på omfang, alder og kvalitet på tilgjengelig informasjon. Som resultat av oppdatert kunnskapsstatus er 60 stasjoner for prøvetaking i screening-undersøkelser foreslått: 13 stasjoner i vannområde Gjerstad-Vegår, 33 i vannområde Nidelva og 14 i vannområde Tovdalselva. 58 stasjoner er i bekker og elver, og to stasjoner i innsjøer.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems
    Master’s Thesis 2017 30 ECTS The Faculty of Environmental Science and Natural Resource Management Survey of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems in Kristiansand Municipality Norway: Pollutants Removal Performance and Solutions: Performance Analysis Based on Web- GIS Model Muhammad Abbas Master in Sustainable Sanitation, Health and Development DECLARATION: I, Muhammad Abbas, declare that this thesis is a result of my research investigation and my own findings. All of sources other than my own knowledge have been acknowledged and a reference list has been attached at the end. This work has never been previously submitted to any other university for the award of any degree or diploma. Signature ________________________ Place and Date _____________________________ DEDICATION: This thesis submitted to fulfill the requirement for master degree in Sustainable Water Sanitation and Public Health from the department of Environmental Sciences (IMV, NMBU). I dedicate this work to my beloved family and especially to my sweet daughters Eishal and Aimen Abbas. God bless you for sacrificing to stay away during the days when I was working on my thesis. With the help of God and your constant encouragement to enable me to complete this task. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First of all, I would like to thanks to my main supervisor Prof. Petter D. Jenssen and co- supervisor Dr. Manoj Kumar Pandey for their sympathetic attitude and guidance through my master program and now in this thesis. I would like to thanks to Marianne Bilksås and Alena Bohackova from Kristiansand municipality for their guidance and additional support during survey. Great thanks to survey team mates Ole Bendik Lilleby, Aleksandra Shelestina and Karoline Hildre Spilling for their hard work and great knowledge about on-site wastewater treatment systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Agder Energi 2017
    III < > Key CSR figures Company-specific data Methodology and further details CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AGDER ENERGI 2017 AGDER ENERGI CSR REPORT 2017 1 III < > Key CSR figures Company-specific data Methodology and further details ABOUT THE REPORT The most important information about the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) at Agder Energi can be found in our annual report. It provides general information aggre- gated for the whole Group. When we say “the Group” in this report, we are referring to the companies presented under the heading “GRI reporting at Agder Energi”. Conse- quently, some figures are inconsistent with those reported last year. Further details can be found in this report. The first part of this report contains information about the Group’s CSR activities, and a more detailed explanation of the reporting process. This includes a description of our work with stakeholders and how the Group and individual companies assess the mate- riality of topics relating to CSR. It also contains a description of the Group’s supply chains and our work in the areas of innovation and regulatory frameworks. This is also where aggregated data for the whole Group are presented. The second part of this report is specific for each individual reporting company. This part includes a short introduction to the relevant company, the company’s data in areas that all companies in the Group report on, as well as company-specific data. The latter covers data that is relevant to one or more of the companies in the Group, but not to all of them. Finally, the methodology used to collect data is presented, together with more infor mation about the reporting process.
    [Show full text]
  • Master's Degree Thesis
    Master’s degree thesis LOG950 Logistics Investigating air transports effect on regional economic development, in a Norwegian context. André Ree Number of pages including this page: 148 Molde, 23.05.2016 Mandatory statement Each student is responsible for complying with rules and regulations that relate to examinations and to academic work in general. The purpose of the mandatory statement is to make students aware of their responsibility and the consequences of cheating. Failure to complete the statement does not excuse students from their responsibility. Please complete the mandatory statement by placing a mark in each box for statements 1-6 below. 1. I/we hereby declare that my/our paper/assignment is my/our own work, and that I/we have not used other sources or received other help than mentioned in the paper/assignment. 2. I/we hereby declare that this paper Mark each 1. Has not been used in any other exam at another box: department/university/university college 1. 2. Is not referring to the work of others without acknowledgement 2. 3. Is not referring to my/our previous work without acknowledgement 3. 4. Has acknowledged all sources of literature in the text and in the list of references 4. 5. Is not a copy, duplicate or transcript of other work 5. I am/we are aware that any breach of the above will be considered as cheating, and may result in annulment of the 3. examination and exclusion from all universities and university colleges in Norway for up to one year, according to the Act relating to Norwegian Universities and University Colleges, section 4-7 and 4-8 and Examination regulations section 14 and 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Laks I Øvre Del Av Tovdalselva
    Rapport nr. 304 Tovdalselva Undersøkelser i Tovdalselva og sidebekker i 2017 Delrapport 2 – laks i øvre del av Tovdalselva Laboratorium for ferskvannsøkologi og innlandsfiske (LFI) Laboratorium for ferskvannsøkologi og innlandsfiske Uni Research Miljø LFI Nygårdsgaten 112 5006 Bergen Telefon: 55 58 22 28 ISSN nr: ISSN-1892-8889 LFI-rapport nr: 304 Tittel: Tovdalselva - Undersøkelser i Tovdalselva og sidebekker i 2017. Delrapport 2 – laks i øvre del av Tovdalselva Dato: 28.02.2018 Forfattere: Gunnar Bekke Lehmann, Sven Erik Gabrielsen, Christoph Postler Geografisk område: Tovdalselva, Aust- og Vest.Agder Oppdragsgiver: Nedre Tovdal fiskelag Antall sider: 32 Emneord: Tovdalselva, vandringshinder, vannføring, bonitering, tiltak, laks, sjøaure Forsidefoto og alle foto i rapporten unntatt der andre er oppgitt: Uni Research Miljø LFI Innhold Sammendrag ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.0 Bakgrunn ................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Geografisk lokalisering .......................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Laksen i vassdraget ................................................................................................................ 5 1.3 Henvendelse fra nedre Tovdal fiskelag................................................................................... 6 1.4 Vannføring og
    [Show full text]
  • Forekomst Av Reproduserende Bestander Av Bekke- Røye (Salvelinus Fontinalis) I Norge Pr
    Forekomst av reproduserende bestander av bekke- røye (Salvelinus fontinalis) i Norge pr. 2013 Trygve Hesthagen og Einar Kleiven NINAs publikasjoner NINA Rapport Dette er en elektronisk serie fra 2005 som erstatter de tidligere seriene NINA Fagrapport, NINA Oppdragsmelding og NINA Project Report. Normalt er dette NINAs rapportering til oppdragsgiver etter gjennomført forsknings-, overvåkings- eller utredningsarbeid. I tillegg vil serien favne mye av instituttets øvrige rapportering, for eksempel fra seminarer og konferanser, resultater av eget forsk- nings- og utredningsarbeid og litteraturstudier. NINA Rapport kan også utgis på annet språk når det er hensiktsmessig. NINA Temahefte Som navnet angir behandler temaheftene spesielle emner. Heftene utarbeides etter behov og se- rien favner svært vidt; fra systematiske bestemmelsesnøkler til informasjon om viktige problemstil- linger i samfunnet. NINA Temahefte gis vanligvis en populærvitenskapelig form med mer vekt på illustrasjoner enn NINA Rapport. NINA Fakta Faktaarkene har som mål å gjøre NINAs forskningsresultater raskt og enkelt tilgjengelig for et større publikum. De sendes til presse, ideelle organisasjoner, naturforvaltningen på ulike nivå, politikere og andre spesielt interesserte. Faktaarkene gir en kort framstilling av noen av våre viktigste forsk- ningstema. Annen publisering I tillegg til rapporteringen i NINAs egne serier publiserer instituttets ansatte en stor del av sine viten- skapelige resultater i internasjonale journaler, populærfaglige bøker og tidsskrifter. Forekomst
    [Show full text]
  • LOCAL ACTION PLAN KRISTIANSAND Geny City 2018
    /LOCAL ACTION PLAN KRISTIANSAND GenY City 2018 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 KRISTIANSAND, AN INGENIOUS CITY WITH AMBITION ........................................................................................................................ 3 CHALLENGE DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................................................... 5 INDUSTRY AND EMPLOYMENT ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 CHILDHOOD AND EDUCATION .......................................................................................................................................................... 10 AN ATTRACTIVE CITY ........................................................................................................................................................................ 11 KRISTIANSANDS CHALLENGES ........................................................................................................................................................ 12 THE CHALLENGES
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSLATION 1 of 3
    114,, Fisheries Pêches TRANSLATION 31 and Oceans et Océans SERIES NO(S) 4888 1 of 3 CANADIAN TRANSLATION OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES No. 4888 Acid lakes and inland fishing in Norway Results from an interview survey (1974 - 1979) by I.H. Sevaldrud, and I.P. Muniz Original Title: Sure vatn og innlandsfisket i Norge. • Resultater fra intervjuunderseelsene 1974-1979. From: Sur NedbOrs Virkning Pa Skog of Fisk (SNSF-Prosjektet) IR 77/80: 1-203, 1980. Translated by the Translation Bureau (sowF) Multilingual Services Division Department of the Secretary of State of Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre St. John's, NFLD 1982 205 pages typescript Secretary Secrétariat of State d'État MULTILINGUAL SERVICES DIVISION — DIVISION DES SERVICES MULTILINGUES TRANSLATION BUREAU BUREAU DES TRADUCT IONS Iffe LIBRARY IDENTIFICATION — FICHE SIGNALÉTIQUE Translated from - Traduction de Into - En Norwegian English Author - Auteur Iver H. Sevaldrud and Ivar Pors Muniz Title in English or French - Titre anglais ou français Acid Lakes and Inland Fishing in Norway. Results from an Interview Survey (1974 - 1979). Title in foreign language (Transliterate foreign characters) Titre en langue étrangère (Transcrire en caractères romains) Sure vatn og innlandsfisket i Norge. Resultater fra intervjuunders$1(e1sene 1974 - 1979 Reference in foreign language (Name of book or publication) in full, transliterate foreign characters. Référence en langue étrangère (Nom du livre ou publication), au complet, transcrire en caractères romains. Sur nedbç4rs virkning pa skog of fisk (SNSF-prosjektet) Reference in English or French - Référence en anglais ou français • 4eicid Precipitation - Effects on Forest and Fish (the SNSF-project) Publisher - Editeur Page Numbers in original DATE OF PUBLICATION Numéros des pages dans SNSF Project, Box 61, DATE DE PUBLICATION l'original Norway 1432 Aas-NHL, 203 Year Issue No.
    [Show full text]
  • Participants List
    NORTH SEA CONFERENCE 2016 15-17 JUNE 2016, Billund, Denmark PARTICIPANTS LIST First name Surname Organisation and project idea Country Email Adrian Mass Allianz für die Region GmbH, Germany [email protected] Growing into Industry 4.0 Albert Ruiter Province of Fryslan The Netherlands a.ruiter&quot;fryslan.nl Anders Laustsen CenSec Denmark [email protected] Andrea Wiencke Allianz für die Region GmbH, Germany [email protected] Growing into Industry 4.0 Andreas Lervik Østfold County Council Norway [email protected] Anja Domnick Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Germany [email protected] Prowad Link Anja Dalsgaard Interreg North Sea Region Programme Secretariat Denmark [email protected] Anke Spoorendonk Ministry of European Affairs Schleswig-Holstein Germany [email protected] Ann Irene Saeternes Eastern Norway County Network Norway [email protected] Anna Maria Sønderholm Væksthus Midtjylland Denmark [email protected] 1 First name Surname Organisation and project idea Country Email Anne Udd Region Halland Sweden [email protected] Ann-Sofie Pauwelyn Waterwegen & Zeekanaal NV Flanders [email protected] Arjen Rodenburg PNO Consultants, CONBIKE and IoTLogistics The Netherlands [email protected] Axel Kristiansen Interreg North Sea Region Programme Secretariat Denmark [email protected] Beate Marie Johnsen Vest-Agder fylkesting Norway [email protected] Benjamin Daumiller Europäisches Institut für Innovation e. V.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomangfold På Kristiansand Lufthavn, Kjevik
    Bioforsk Rapport Vol. 3 Nr. 111 2008 Biomangfold på Kristiansand lufthavn, Kjevik Forslag til skjøtselsplan for avgrensede A- områder. Ellen Svalheim (Bioforsk) og Frode Ødegaard (NINA) Forord Flere sjeldne arter er registrert på tørrbakkeengene ved den søndre rullebaneende ved Kristiansand lufthavn, Kjevik. Artsfunnene er i hovedsak knyttet til insekter bl.a. rødknappvikler (Selenodes karelica ). Denne arten er en rødlistet sommerfuglart med status sterkt truet (EN) på den Norske rødlista. Så vidt man vet finnes rødknappvikler bare et par steder i Norge, og skrenten ved Kristiansand lufthavn, Kjevik er en av disse. Undertegnede forfattere ble forespurt av Avinor om å gjøre en registrering av biologisk mangfold langs søndre rullebaneende. Videre ønsket Avinor å få utformet en skjøtselsplan for hvordan mangfoldet kan ivaretas på en god måte framover. Kristiansand lufthavn, Kjevik er gitt en teknisk godkjenning av lufthavna for perioden 2007-2012, utstedt av Luftfartstilsynet. Vilkårene for denne godkjennelsen er at sikkerhetsområdene som omslutter rullebanen oppgraderes i samsvar med gjeldene forskriftskrav (Bestemmelser for Sivil Luftfart E 3-2) innen utgangen av godkjenningsperioden 1. oktober 2012. Tiltakene på Kjevik er spesielt knyttet til økte krav til lengde og bredde på sikkerhetsområdet ved enden av rullebanen. Dersom Avinor unnlater å gjennomføre utbedringene vil Kristiansand lufthavn pålegges restriksjoner fra myndighetene som vil begrense bruken av lufthavna. Avinor har videre forespurt undertegnede om å komme med forslag til behandling av masser i samband med nødvendige utvidelser av sikkerhetssonen ved søndre rullebaneende. Dette er gjort for at man skal kunne vurdere ulik anleggsutførelse opp mot virkningene på vegetasjon/insektsliv på kort og lang sikt. En rekke personer har vært involvert og forespurt gjennom arbeidet med skjøtselsplanen.
    [Show full text]