DOCSLIB.ORG

Participants List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Participants List NORTH SEA CONFERENCE 2016 15-17 JUNE 2016, Billund, Denmark PARTICIPANTS LIST First name Surname Organisation and project idea Country Email Adrian Mass Allianz für die Region GmbH, Germany [email protected] Growing into Industry 4.0 Albert Ruiter Province of Fryslan The Netherlands a.ruiter"fryslan.nl Anders Laustsen CenSec Denmark [email protected] Andrea Wiencke Allianz für die Region GmbH, Germany [email protected] Growing into Industry 4.0 Andreas Lervik Østfold County Council Norway [email protected] Anja Domnick Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Germany [email protected] Prowad Link Anja Dalsgaard Interreg North Sea Region Programme Secretariat Denmark [email protected] Anke Spoorendonk Ministry of European Affairs Schleswig-Holstein Germany [email protected] Ann Irene Saeternes Eastern Norway County Network Norway [email protected] Anna Maria Sønderholm Væksthus Midtjylland Denmark [email protected] 1 First name Surname Organisation and project idea Country Email Anne Udd Region Halland Sweden [email protected] Ann-Sofie Pauwelyn Waterwegen & Zeekanaal NV Flanders [email protected] Arjen Rodenburg PNO Consultants, CONBIKE and IoTLogistics The Netherlands [email protected] Axel Kristiansen Interreg North Sea Region Programme Secretariat Denmark [email protected] Beate Marie Johnsen Vest-Agder fylkesting Norway [email protected] Benjamin Daumiller Europäisches Institut für Innovation e. V. Germany [email protected] Benjamin Meijer Hezelburcht The Netherlands [email protected] Birgit Aaroenaes Møre og Romsdal County Council Norway [email protected] Brigitte Feenstra Province of Fryslân, The Netherlands [email protected] BIOCAS Camilla L Stavnes North Sea Commission Norway [email protected] Carsten Westerholt Interreg North Sea Region Programme Secretariat Denmark [email protected] Charlotte van der Gun Regional Water Authority Drents Overijsselse Delta The Netherlands [email protected] Chris Barnett Canal & River Trust, UK [email protected] Small Hydro Schemes Christian Byrith Interreg North Sea Region Programme Secretariat Denmark [email protected] 2 First name Surname Organisation and project idea Country Email Christina Folmand Knudsen Aalborg Municipality Denmark [email protected] Christoffer Villsen Interreg North Sea Region Programme Secretariat Denmark [email protected] Christopher Stimpel Allianz für die Region GmbH, Germany [email protected] Growing into Industry 4.0 Claudia Harms City of Bremerhaven Germany [email protected] Dawn Marie Syvertsen Telemark fylkeskommune Norway [email protected] Deirdre Buist-Murphy Province of Drenthe, The Netherlands [email protected] Innofest Dirk Harmsen County Administrative Board Västra Götaland Sweden [email protected] Dominic Munro-McCarthy Suffolk County Council UK [email protected] Eelko Steenhuis City of Groningen The Netherlands [email protected] Einar Stokka North Sea Commission Norway [email protected] Elmer Koole Province Groningen The Netherlands [email protected] Eric Vos Province of Fryslân, The Netherlands [email protected] Guilds 2.0 Erik Ørskov Region of Southern Denmark Denmark [email protected] Erik Kursetgjerde More og Romsdal County Norway [email protected] 3 First name Surname Organisation and project idea Country Email Eva Sehested Interreg North Sea Region Programme Secretariat Denmark [email protected] Eva Lundin Hedmark County Council Norway [email protected] Eveline Buyck City of Bruges Flanders [email protected] Fiona Watson Scottish Enterprise UK [email protected] Floor Guldemond ERAC The Netherlands [email protected] Frank Everaarts Netherlands Enterprise Agency The Netherlands [email protected] Franziska Stenzel Erlebnis Bremerhaven GmbH, Germany [email protected] Frederieke van der Lijn Municipality of Achtkarspelen, The Netherlands [email protected] Green Economy Geert Schaap Sweco, Sweden [email protected] Power2Gas Geir Soer-Reime Rogaland County Council Norway [email protected] Gino Dehullu City of Roeselare Flanders [email protected] Gunn Marit Helgesen Telemark County Council Norway [email protected] Hanne Witters Antwerp Province Flanders [email protected] Hans Bressers University of Twente, The Netherlands [email protected] CATCH 4 First name Surname Organisation and project idea Country Email Hans Edvard Askjer Telemark County Council Norway [email protected] Hans Philip Tietje Region Syddanmark Denmark [email protected] Harald Marencic Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Germany [email protected] Prowad Link Hein Braaksma Reframe Project The Netherlands [email protected] Helen Barnard RSPB UK [email protected] Helle Oltedal Stord/Haugesund University College Norway [email protected] Helle Baker Norden Middelfart Wastewater Utility Denmark [email protected] Helmut Berends Berends-Consult, Germany [email protected] Small Hydro Schemes Henrik Jensen Central Denmark Region Denmark [email protected] Hiltje van der wal Municipality of Groningen The Netherlands [email protected] Ilke Borowski-Maaser Interessen Im Fluss Germany [email protected] Inge Døskeland Hordaland fylkeskommune Norway [email protected] Isabella Leong Interreg North Sea Region Programme Secretariat Denmark [email protected] Jahangir Kaisar Tillväxtverket Sweden [email protected] 5 First name Surname Organisation and project idea Country Email Jan Willem Zwart Municipality of Achtkarspelen, Green Economy The Netherlands [email protected] Jenny Brodén City of Karlstad Sweden [email protected] Jens Kurnol Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning Germany [email protected] Jeroen Van Overloop Federal Public Service Mobility Other [email protected] Jeroen Westendorp Municipality of Groningen The Netherlands [email protected] Jesper Joensson Interreg North Sea Region Programme Secretariat Denmark [email protected] Joerg Wilke Northern Institute of Thinking Germany [email protected] Johanna Möller Tillväxtverket Sweden [email protected] Jon Aasen The County of Møre&Romsdal Norway [email protected] Jon Halvard Eide Vest-Agder County Council Norway [email protected] Jonathan Millins East of England European Partnership UK [email protected] Jon-Olav Strand Aust-Agder County Council Norway [email protected] Joram Snijders Province of Noord-Holland The Netherlands [email protected] Karen Anne Kjendlie Vestfold County Council Norway [email protected] Karen Greve Somerset Region Nordjylland Denmark [email protected] Katarina Nordmark Värmland County Administrative Board, Sweden [email protected] 6 First name Surname Organisation and project idea Country Email DIME Kate Clarke Hordaland County Council Norway [email protected] Kathrin Rath Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, e-Commuting Germany [email protected] Katrijn Raeymaekers City of Turnhout Flanders [email protected] Kent Bentzen NTU Denmark [email protected] Kia Abildtrup Region of Southern Denmark Denmark [email protected] Kira Petersen Interreg North Sea Region Programme Secretariat Denmark [email protected] Kirsten Holst Region of Southern Denmark Denmark [email protected] Kjersti Helene Garberg Østfold County Council Norway [email protected] Klaus Gunnestrup Business Development Centre Central Denmark Denmark [email protected] Klaus Hebecker Region Hannover Germany [email protected] Kristian Wulff Viden Djurs Denmark [email protected] Kåre Kristiansen Vest-Agder fylkeskommune, Norway [email protected] Coast to Coast Kåre Pettersen Vestfold fylkeskommune Norway [email protected] Lars Olsen LH Destination Design Denmark [email protected] 7 First name Surname Organisation and project idea Country Email Lars Haukvik Telemark fylkeskommune Norway [email protected] Lena Andreasson Region Halland Sweden [email protected] Leo Hellinga Municipality of Groningen The Netherlands [email protected] Luc van Raaij ERAC The Netherlands [email protected] Lydia Vaske LWK Niedersachsen Germany [email protected] Malene Thune Væksthus Midtjylland Denmark [email protected] Marijke Polanski Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Germany [email protected] Prowad Link Martijn Warmerdam Reeleaf BV The Netherlands [email protected] Mathijs van Campenhout PNO Consultants The Netherlands [email protected] Matt Nichols Interreg North Sea Region Programme Secretariat Denmark [email protected] Matt Jones Suffolk County Council UK [email protected] Matthias Maring Office for Regional Development Leine-Weser Germany [email protected] Menno Brouwer Municipality of Achtkarspelen, The Netherlands [email protected] Green Economy Mette Bro Lund Region of Southern Denmark Denmark [email protected] 8 First name Surname Organisation and project idea Country Email Mette Bechsgaard Interreg North Sea Region Programme Secretariat Denmark [email protected]
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regional Planning in Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden Regional Planning in Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden
    MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT FOREST AND NATURE AGENCY SPATIAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT Working paper Regional planning in Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden Regional planning in Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden Prepared by Nordregio for Ministry of Environment Forest and Nature Agency Spatial Planning Department Denmark Printed in Denmark ISBN 87-7279-544-2 Internet Ó 2004 by the Ministry of Environment Forest and Nature Agency, Denmark All rights reserved. Published April 2004 Nordregio has been commissioned by the Danish Ministry of Environment to give a short presentation of the regional planning systems in Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. The overviews given in this paper are based on state of the art knowledge from four of the staff members at the institute and do as such not represent any research effort. The overviews, while trying to represent and discuss the same topics, differ slightly from country to country as a reflection of the variations of planning focus of the countries in question. The texts only express the opinion of their authors. Arto Ruotsalainen, Pétur Ingi Haraldsson, Jon P. Knudsen and Moa Tunström. October 2003 2 Preface This report on regional planning in Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden is required to be used in the work of the Regional Planning Committee. The Regional Planning Committee was established by the Danish Government in 2002 with an objective of giving recommendations for an improvement and simplification of the present regional planning in Denmark. For this purpose it has been appropriate to include examples from the countries around us. The Regional Planning Committee is to make a proposal to the future regional planning in Denmark, a proposal that is based on the forthcoming reform of the regional and municipal structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Manudeep Singh Bhuller Inndeling Av Norge I Arbeidsmarkedsregioner
    2009/24 Notater Manudeep Singh Bhuller Inndeling av Norge i Notaterarbeidsmarkedsregioner Forskningsavdelingen/Gruppe for offentlig økonomi 1 Innledning1 Formålet med dette arbeidet har vært å lage en inndeling av Norge i arbeidsmarkedsregioner som et alternativ til den inndelingen som foreslås i Standard for økonomiske regioner (NOS C 616) fra 2002. Mens SSBs inndeling av Norge i 90 økonomiske regioner hovedsakelig er ment som et hensiktsmessig publiseringsnivå for statistikk på et nivå mellom fylke og kommune, har den også blitt benyttet i arbeidsmarkedsanalyser (Hustoft m.fl. 1999). En svakhet ved denne inndelingen er at hver av regionene ikke tillates å inneholde områder fra mer en ett fylke. Som ledd i analyse av arbeidsmarkedet er det imidlertid ønskelig med en regional inndeling som er uavhengig av fylkesgrenser og samtidig er rimelig stabil over tid. Vi vil derfor understreke at inndelingen som foreslås i dette notatet er ment som et supple- ment til og ikke en erstatning for Standard for økonomiske regioner. Arbeidet med inndel- ingen av arbeidsmarkedsregioner er hovedsakelig basert på pendlingsstatistikk for norske kommuner for perioden 2000-2006. Datamaterialet som er brukt ligger tilgjengelig for alle på SSBs nettsted. For å operasjonalisere inndelingen for bruk i empirisk arbeid, settes det også en nedre grense på antall bosatte i hver region. Lie (2000) skiller mellom oppdelende og sammenslående prosedyrer for å danne regionale inndelinger. Ved oppdelende prosedyrer blir det en vil dele inn delt opp etter nærmere bestemte retningslinjer, basert på en teori eller idé om hva som skiller de ulike regionene fra hverandre. Inndelingsmetodene som kan kategoriseres som oppdelende begynner ofte med en identifisering av et senterhierarki basert på tettstedsstørrelse og pendlingsstrømmer.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Øresund Kattegat Skagerrak Cooperation Projects in Interreg IV A
    ConneCting Øresund Kattegat SkagerraK Cooperation projeCts in interreg iV a 1 CONTeNT INTRODUCTION 3 PROgRamme aRea 4 PROgRamme PRIORITIes 5 NUmbeR Of PROjeCTs aPPROveD 6 PROjeCT aReas 6 fINaNCIal OveRvIew 7 maRITIme IssUes 8 HealTH CaRe IssUes 10 INfRasTRUCTURe, TRaNsPORT aND PlaNNINg 12 bUsINess DevelOPmeNT aND eNTRePReNeURsHIP 14 TOURIsm aND bRaNDINg 16 safeTy IssUes 18 skIlls aND labOUR maRkeT 20 PROjeCT lIsT 22 CONTaCT INfORmaTION 34 2 INTRODUCTION a short story about the programme With this brochure we want to give you some highlights We have furthermore gathered a list of all our 59 approved from the Interreg IV A Oresund–Kattegat–Skagerrak pro- full-scale projects to date. From this list you can see that gramme, a programme involving Sweden, Denmark and the projects cover a variety of topics, involve many actors Norway. The aim with this programme is to encourage and and plan to develop a range of solutions and models to ben- support cross-border co-operation in the southwestern efit the Oresund–Kattegat–Skagerrak area. part of Scandinavia. The programme area shares many of The brochure is developed by the joint technical secre- the same problems and challenges. By working together tariat. The brochure covers a period from March 2008 to and exchanging knowledge and experiences a sustainable June 2010. and balanced future will be secured for the whole region. It is our hope that the brochure shows the diversity in Funding from the European Regional Development Fund the project portfolio as well as the possibilities of cross- is one of the important means to enhance this development border cooperation within the framework of an EU-pro- and to encourage partners to work across the border.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Agder Energi 2017
    III < > Key CSR figures Company-specific data Methodology and further details CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AGDER ENERGI 2017 AGDER ENERGI CSR REPORT 2017 1 III < > Key CSR figures Company-specific data Methodology and further details ABOUT THE REPORT The most important information about the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) at Agder Energi can be found in our annual report. It provides general information aggre- gated for the whole Group. When we say “the Group” in this report, we are referring to the companies presented under the heading “GRI reporting at Agder Energi”. Conse- quently, some figures are inconsistent with those reported last year. Further details can be found in this report. The first part of this report contains information about the Group’s CSR activities, and a more detailed explanation of the reporting process. This includes a description of our work with stakeholders and how the Group and individual companies assess the mate- riality of topics relating to CSR. It also contains a description of the Group’s supply chains and our work in the areas of innovation and regulatory frameworks. This is also where aggregated data for the whole Group are presented. The second part of this report is specific for each individual reporting company. This part includes a short introduction to the relevant company, the company’s data in areas that all companies in the Group report on, as well as company-specific data. The latter covers data that is relevant to one or more of the companies in the Group, but not to all of them. Finally, the methodology used to collect data is presented, together with more infor mation about the reporting process.
    [Show full text]
  • CEMENT for BUILDING with AMBITION Aalborg Portland A/S Portland Aalborg Cover Photo: the Great Belt Bridge, Denmark
    CEMENT FOR BUILDING WITH AMBITION Aalborg Portland A/S Cover photo: The Great Belt Bridge, Denmark. AALBORG Aalborg Portland Holding is owned by the Cementir Group, an inter- national supplier of cement and concrete. The Cementir Group’s PORTLAND head office is placed in Rome and the Group is listed on the Italian ONE OF THE LARGEST Stock Exchange in Milan. CEMENT PRODUCERS IN Cementir's global organization is THE NORDIC REGION divided into geographical regions, and Aalborg Portland A/S is included in the Nordic & Baltic region covering Aalborg Portland A/S has been a central pillar of the Northern Europe. business community in Denmark – and particularly North Jutland – for more than 125 years, with www.cementirholding.it major importance for employment, exports and development of industrial knowhow. Aalborg Portland is one of the largest producers of grey cement in the Nordic region and the world’s leading manufacturer of white cement. The company is at the forefront of energy-efficient production of high-quality cement at the plant in Aalborg. In addition to the factory in Aalborg, Aalborg Portland includes five sales subsidiaries in Iceland, Poland, France, Belgium and Russia. Aalborg Portland is part of Aalborg Portland Holding, which is the parent company of a number of cement and concrete companies in i.a. the Nordic countries, Belgium, USA, Turkey, Egypt, Malaysia and China. Additionally, the Group has acti vities within extraction and sales of aggregates (granite and gravel) and recycling of waste products. Read more on www.aalborgportlandholding.com, www.aalborgportland.dk and www.aalborgwhite.com. Data in this brochure is based on figures from 2017, unless otherwise stated.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding the Land of Opportunity Intergenerational Mobility in Denmark
    Finding the Land of Opportunity Intergenerational Mobility in Denmark Jesper Eriksen Department of Business and Management Aalborg University 178,866 characters with spaces - 74.5 pages May 31, 2018 Abstract Denne afhandling omhandler lige muligheder inden for intergenerationel mobilitet i en dansk kontekst. Afhandlingen forholder sig til spørgsmålet, “Er lighed i muligheder påvirket af lokalområder i Danmark?”. Jeg besvarer forskningsspørgsmålet ved at undersøge tre under- spørgsmål: (1) “Hvad karakteriserer den geografiske fordeling af muligheder i Danmark?”, (2) “Hvorfor kunne bestemte grupper, defineret ved geografi, forventes at opleve højere eller lavere mobilitet? Hvilken rolle spiller lokalområde karakteristika som forklarende variabel i forhold til lige muligheder?”, og (3) “Hvad er effekten af at flytte fra ét lokal område til et andet for lige muligheder for flyttende familier?“. Først opstiller jeg et teoretisk grundlag for at kunne diskutere lighed i muligheder, som filosofisk begreb, i relation til gængse mål for lighed i muligheder: intergenerationel mobilitet. Jeg påviser, at det ikke er muligt at vurdere, hvorvidt lighed i muligheder påvirkes ud fra nogen af de tre teorier ved alene at undersøge mobilitetsmål. For at besvare forskningsspørgsmålet kræves der information om, hvordan lokalområder kausalt påvirker intergenerationel mobilitet. For at besvare første underspørgsmål beskriver jeg grundlæggende træk i litteraturen om in- tergenerational mobilitet, samt den metodiske literatur om intergenerationel mobilitetsmål. Datagrundlaget for besvarelsen er dansk registerdata for perioden 1980-2012, som tillader kobling af børn og forældre, samt måling af samlet indkomst før skat. Ved at allokere børn født mellem 1973-1975 til de kommuner, som primært vokser op i, fra de er 7-15 viser jeg, at der er substantiel variation i intergenerationel mobilitet på tværs af danske kommuner.
    [Show full text]
  • New Hospital Construction - Future Hospitals in Denmark
    INNOVATING BETTER LIFE SUSTAINABLE HOSPITALS New Hospital Construction - Future Hospitals in Denmark WHITE PAPER SUSTAINABLE HOSPITALS Future Hospitals in Denmark About this white paper Steering Committee This white paper presents the Danish approach to new hospital Danish Ministry of Health, Martin Nyrop Holgersen, [email protected] construction and includes a wide range of innovative solutions that Danish Regions, Kristian Taageby Nielsen, [email protected] contribute to creating sustainable healthcare for the future. It is part North Denmark Region, Niels Uhrenfeldt, [email protected] of a series of white papers that show how Danish solutions can con- Region Zealand, Helle Gaub, [email protected] tribute to increase efficiency in healthcare while empowering patients Region of Southern Denmark, Torben Kyed Larsen, [email protected] and staff. Danish Export Association, Thomas Andersen, [email protected] Danish healthcare innovation is not exclusive for the Danes: many Systematic, Jacob Gade, [email protected] years of global presence show that our healthcare products and solu- tions create value internationally. Danish ideas and products are used Contributors every day in hospitals, medical clinics, ambulances, and nursing homes 3XN, Stig Vesterager Gothelf, [email protected] across the world. Agitek, Jean-Paul Bergmann, [email protected] Arkitema Architects, Birgitte Gade Ernst, [email protected] We hope to inspire you and would like to invite you to Denmark to Bim Equity, Ida Maria Sandgreen, [email protected] learn more about the Danish
    [Show full text]
  • Aalborg - Denmark - Europan12 REDEFINING URBAN QUALITY
    Aalborg - Denmark - europan12 REDEFINING URBAN QUALITY Aerial photo with strategic elements CATEGORY urban HOW THE SITE CAN CONTRIBUTE TO THE ADAPTABLE CITY? CITY STRATEGY TEAM REPRESENTATIVE architect / urban planner / landscaper Vestbyen is one of the oldest boroughs in Aalborg, established as a residential With a population of 122,000, Aalborg is the largest town in the northernmost area to house the workers employed by industrial advances between 1900 region of Denmark. In recent years, the city has undergone an extreme trans- LOCATION AALBORG and 1950. The district has not developed noticeably since it was built. This is in formation from industrial town to knowledge and experience city. The city has POPULATION City 120 000 inhab. Conurbation 125 000 inhab. contrast to the rest of the city - especially the centre - which has experienced revamped itself as «the city on the fjord», and has over the past 10-15 years STRATEGIC SITE 80 ha SITE OF PROJECT 32 ha major change and expansion over the last few years, with investment in large- made great investments in the regeneration of the central waterfronts and the SITE PROPOSED BY Municipality, Region and housing associations scale international projects. Along with the neighborhood’s untapped poten- central Midtbyen district, which has provided the entire city centre with a lift OWNER OF THE SITE Municipality, Region and housing associations tial, new strategies for Vestbyen can contribute to this development of Aalborg and a new identity. In 1974, a large university was built in the eastern part of as the small but internationally-oriented city. A new strategy for Vestbyen could Aalborg, which today is hugely influential on the city’s growth and business life.
    [Show full text]
  • Master's Degree Thesis
    Master’s degree thesis LOG950 Logistics Investigating air transports effect on regional economic development, in a Norwegian context. André Ree Number of pages including this page: 148 Molde, 23.05.2016 Mandatory statement Each student is responsible for complying with rules and regulations that relate to examinations and to academic work in general. The purpose of the mandatory statement is to make students aware of their responsibility and the consequences of cheating. Failure to complete the statement does not excuse students from their responsibility. Please complete the mandatory statement by placing a mark in each box for statements 1-6 below. 1. I/we hereby declare that my/our paper/assignment is my/our own work, and that I/we have not used other sources or received other help than mentioned in the paper/assignment. 2. I/we hereby declare that this paper Mark each 1. Has not been used in any other exam at another box: department/university/university college 1. 2. Is not referring to the work of others without acknowledgement 2. 3. Is not referring to my/our previous work without acknowledgement 3. 4. Has acknowledged all sources of literature in the text and in the list of references 4. 5. Is not a copy, duplicate or transcript of other work 5. I am/we are aware that any breach of the above will be considered as cheating, and may result in annulment of the 3. examination and exclusion from all universities and university colleges in Norway for up to one year, according to the Act relating to Norwegian Universities and University Colleges, section 4-7 and 4-8 and Examination regulations section 14 and 15.
    [Show full text]
  • LOCAL ACTION PLAN KRISTIANSAND Geny City 2018
    /LOCAL ACTION PLAN KRISTIANSAND GenY City 2018 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 KRISTIANSAND, AN INGENIOUS CITY WITH AMBITION ........................................................................................................................ 3 CHALLENGE DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................................................... 5 INDUSTRY AND EMPLOYMENT ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 CHILDHOOD AND EDUCATION .......................................................................................................................................................... 10 AN ATTRACTIVE CITY ........................................................................................................................................................................ 11 KRISTIANSANDS CHALLENGES ........................................................................................................................................................ 12 THE CHALLENGES
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Strategy 2015 25 09
    Educational Strategy 2015-2018 Content Preface 4 Status 6 Vision and goals Sub-goals 1. Broad cooperation among educational institutions 10 Status Goals 2. Innovative cooperation among study programmes and business 12 Status Goals 3. STAY – work after completion of studies 14 Status Goals 4. Development of study environment and housing offers – including CAMPUS 16 Status Goals 5. Cultural and leisure offers with focus on students 18 Status Goals 6. Globalisation and internationalisation 20 Status Goals Marketing the educational city 22 Appendices 24 Preface Aalborg has undergone rapid growth in recent Our goal is for Aalborg to be the town where it years. In 2014, the nearly 41,000 students in Aal- is easiest to get a student job and internship, to borg accounted for approximately 20% of resi- cooperate with the business community etc. – dents in the city. Aalborg can therefore rightly be In Aalborg, you can use what you learn. Aalborg referred to as an educational city. wants to be Denmark’s best educational city. During the period from 2012-2014, many stu- We have already come far… dents chose Aalborg as their educational city. It is our goal to continue to attract students from the Aalborg wants to go even further. We want to Northern Jutland region, but also from the rest commit ourselves. We must actively contribute of the country. A high number of students in Aal- to the creation of alliances between the educa- borg, however, is not a goal in itself. tion and business communities that ensure that students receive a good education, but also a We want students to choose Aalborg because connection to the job market during their studies Aalborg can offer them the education of their and thus far greater chances of getting a job upon dreams, but also because Aalborg Municipality is graduating.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018 Sigve Knutson
    Årsrapport 2017 Annual report 2018 Sigve Knutson WINNER OF SPAREBANKEN SØR ARTIST AWARD, 2018. Sigve Knutson (b. 1999, from Lillesand) has, despite his young age, received a lot of attention for working in an innovative and playful way. His objects are often in a landscape between art, architecture and design, and even though they are reminiscent of sculptures, they are also meant for practical use. All his works are handmade, and the tools and methods used reveal themselves as traces in his works. Knutson is educated at the architect and design college in Oslo and at the Design Academy in Eindhoven in the Netherlands. His career got a kick start in 2017 when his creation ended up on the New York Times list of 16 best things they had seen during the furniture fair in Milano. 2 Contents 4 The year 2018 6 Key figures group 7 Board of Director’s report 2018 22 Income statement 23 Balance sheet 24 Statement of changes in equity 25 Cash flow statement 26 Notes 96 Calculations 97 Alternative performance measures 98 Corporate governance 104 Corporate social responsibility report 109 Declaration from the Board of Director’s and CEO 110 Auditor’s report for 2018 115 Organisation 115 The Bank’s branches 116 The Group management 3 The year 2018 STRONG MARKET POSITION IN A REGION OF POSITIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Trade and industry in the region developed positively throughout 2018, and a number of businesses and sectors have experienced increasing economic growth. Businesses in the region have shown a high level of adaptability after the economic downturn that followed the fall in oil prices in 2014, and we are now seeing growth in production and investments, falling unemployment and growth in the employment rate.
    [Show full text]