E456 Volume 13 I I SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF Public Disclosure Authorized

RURAL ENERGY 1 PROJECT - PHASE 3 (SURPLUS CAPITAL)

Public Disclosure Authorized FEASIBILITY STUDY

Volume 2 | | Environmental Assessment

Project Manager Nguyen Nam Trung Deputy Chief Clerk Nguyen Anh Tuan i Public Disclosure Authorized

U PP. Director Technical Scientific Service Enterprise D ty director

Public Disclosure Authorized Nguyen Van Dong I I I I 1. INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF WVORK 1.1. Objectives of the Project The Project is aimed to develop rutral distribution powNer net work for remote communes. This will be a base for economic and social development of rural areas of the northern .

Project will electrify 55 communes in 4 provinces of Northern of Vietnam; they are Dien Bien, Lai Chau, Ha Giang and Lao Cai.

Objectives of the Project are: - Extend and strengthen irural powver netwvork in 4 provinces: Dien Bien, Lai Chau, Ha Giang and Lao Cai. - Ensure reliability, quality of power network; 3 - Increase electrification ratio in Project's provinces; - Decrease power losses in low voltage power network; - Improve power quality in the Project's areas.

1.2. Selection of the Project's communes Generally, selected commune should voluntarily show their intercst to joint the I Project. The cormune should undcrstand of the Project and requircinenrs of the WB and the Government for approval of the Project. The main objective of the Project is effecti-ve investment in term of econiomics and social development. The interested commune will be selected if fulfill the following,s criteria: 1. Un-elcctr-fied commune; ihe connection with distribution network is | possible and feasible; commune should be belonged to low electiJfied communes in the Northern provinces of Vietnam. 2. The comrmiune should have potential for economic development; 3. Local people should be able to cover the cost for connection with power distribution network and have money to cover the cost for electricity tariff, 4.| Communes arc located in remote areas; I 5. Communes that main citizens are ethnic minorities; 6. Communes that are in special priority program of the Government; 7. Communes that have other ODA projects, especially WB projects. S. Commurnes that arc the poorest commutines and receiving othier poverty alleviation program of other local and international donors.

Selected communlles are listed in Table 1.1.

1,I' 2

| ...... ~~~~~~~~~~~ I I

Table 1.1. Name of Project's communes Province Districts Commune 1. Dien Bien 1. Dien Bien Pa Thom

______- I M uong Loi 2. Muong Nhe Na Hy 3. Tuan Giao Tenh Phong 1 4. Tua Chua Huoi So _____ 5. Muong Lay Muong Tung * 2. Ha Giang 6. Xin Man { Chi Ca ______2Nan Xin ______C _ oc R e

______7I Bac Qu a n g T a N hiu | I~~~~~~~~~~~______-______7. Bac Quang Dong Thanh | g[ 8. Yen Minh Ngam La ______Sung Trang ______Sung Thai ______9. Dong Van Lung Thau 10. Bac Me Thuong Tan ______11. Quang Binh Yen Binh

3. Lai Chau 12. Phong Tho Khon Lao _ Ma Ly Chai ______Pa V ay Su I Mu Si San ______-- 13. Sin Ho Le Loi

______N oon q H eo ______3______Pu Dao Pu Sam Cap 14. Muong Te Nam Khao Muong Te ______tM uong M o | F~______*______XK ______a Lang I _____|____|___ Thu Lum |______Namn Hang 4. Lao Cai 15. Bac Ha Ta Chai * ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~BanGia L______Nam Det I I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I I II

Province Districts Commune

R______Nam Khanh ______C o c L y Hoang Thu Pho Ta Van Chu Na Hoi I 16. Bao Yen Cam Con *______Nghia Do *______17. Sa Pa Ban Khoang ______B an P hun g I ______La o C hai ISan Xa Ho ______- _ Thanh Phu 18. Can Ho

______- Quan Than San 19. Van Ban Son Thuy

______- _ _ _ _ Tham Duong

Dan Thana _ | __ ~~~~~~~~~~NamMa _ 20. Bat Xat Nam Pung__ I Den Thang Pa Cheo * TOTAL COMMUNES 55

1.3. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION

Project owner: Power Company No 1

Consulting Company: Power Engineering and Consulting Company N° I through its Science, Tcchnology Scrvicc Entcrprisc. I

1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4 I Province Districts Commune ______Nam Khanh

_ _ I ______~C o o Ly Hoang Thu Pho I Ta Van Chu ______tNa Hoi 16. Bao Yen Cam Con Nghia Do

*______.17. _ Sa Pa Ban Khoang

______Ban Phung Lao Chai San Xa Ho ______Thanh _ Phu 18. Si Ma Cai Can Ho Quan Than San 19. Van Ban Son Thuy 3 Tham Duong

______I|Dan Thang ______Nam Ma 20. Bat Xat Nam Pung Den Thang ______Pa Cheo * TOTAL COMMUNES 55

1.3. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION

I Project owner: Power Company No l

Consulting Company: Power Engineering and Consulting Company N° I through its Science, Technology Service Enterprise.

I

I

4 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1. INVESTMIENT STRUCTURE OF THE PROJECT Table 2. 1. The investment structure of the Project (VND) WB EVN Compensation Contribution of local Province Total investment people 1. Dien Bien 46,096,085,741 34,472,679,546 10,059,642,935 130,428,209 1,431,335,050 2. Ha Giang 90,408,767,178 67,724,742,872 18,095,632,067 368,403,526 4,219,988,713 3. Lai Chau 96,770,890,083 72,083,874,102 21,116,066,554 240,341,407 3,330,608,021 4. Lao Cai 130,020,384,983 95,622,451,865 27,488,007,739 521,439,316 6,388,486,067

Table 2.2. Total investment cost (VND) No Items/Province Lai Chau Dien Bien Lao Cai Ha Giang Total I Equipment 3,291,479,200 2,257,222,422 6,009,371,718 3,684,323,592 15,242,396,932 2 Construction 69,535,386,360 32,607,405,601 90,728,483,833 64,759,357,855 257,630,633,649 3 Other expenditures 11,900.353,217 5,619,301,505 15,180,744,089 9,574,841,225 42,275,240,036 4 Contigency 8,797,353,644 4,190,371,431 11,820,034,996 8,218,978,835 33,026,738,906 5 Compensation 218,492,188 118,571,099 474,035,742 334,912,296 1,146,011,325 6 Contribution by local people 3,027,825,473 1,301,213,682 5,807,714,606 3,836,353,376 13,973,107,137 Total 96,770,890,083 46,094,085,741 130,020,384,983 90,408,767,178 363,294,127,986

5 m m m m m m m - m m m m m m - m m m - m m

2.2. PROJECT COMPONENTS Table 2.2. Project's components New MV No of MV LV No of LV No of Province Districts Commune (m) poles (i) poles substations 1. Dien Bien 1. Dien Bien Pa Thom 13,265 121 4,270 150 4 ______Muong Loi 20,380 176 8,835 313 7 2. Muong Nlie Na Hy 38,790 343 11,411 399 8 ______3. Tuan Giao Tenh Phon 9,570 105 14,939 610 4 4. Tua Chua Huoi So 14,260 173 6,863 303 3 5. Muong Lay Muong Tung 3,850 42 8,453 369 4 2. Ha Giang 6. Xin Man Chi Ca 11,695 104 13,410 338 3 Nan Xin 12,070 105 19,480 487 3 Coc Re 6,295 51 15,740 394 3 Ta Nhiu 5,345 52 17,110 429 3 7. Bac Quang Donq Thanh 16,730 55 36,540 1,353 6 8. Yen Minh Ngam La 7,050 56 12,625 445 3 Sung Trang 8,680 75 16,495 528 4 Sung Thai 11,705 156 20,450 676 5 ______9. Dong Van Lunq Thau 6,750 55 14,640 483 3 10. Bac hte Thuong Tan 27,150 158 19,700 603 6 11. Quang Binh Yen Binh 12,700 148 37,450 1,137 8 3. Lai Chau 12. Phong Tluo Khonq Lao 625 6 8,443 3 Ma Ly Chai 12,000 101 _ 4,400 160 1

______Pa Vay Su 12,300 115 4,572 147 2 _ __ Mu Si San 2,500 23 4,900 170 1 -- ______13. Sin Hol Le Loi 13,726 117 9,295 300 | 3

6 m - m m - m m m m m m - - m m m m -

New MV No of MV LV No of LV No of Province Districts Commune (m) poles (i) poles substations Noong Heo 14,685 207 19,730 730 3 L Pu Dao 14,622 206 6,180 229 2 .______.______Pu Sam Cap 16,149 162 5,340 156 2 14. Muong Te Nam Khao 24,529 235 1,088 49 3 !______Muong Te 14,500 141 6,575 189 3 Muong Mo 25,430 196 6,075 196 3 ______Ka Lang 31,255 240 12,167 393 5 Thu Lum 11,740 90 4,400 142 2 Nam Hang 27,092 251 10,521 364 5 | 4. Lao Cai 15. Bac Ha Ta Chai 1,940 13 2,385 77 2 ______Ban Gia 8,470 62 5,756 210 2 Nam Det 6,802 63 12,965 229 2 _ __ Nam Khanh 9,385 90 11,009 245 2 Coc Ly 17,305 117 21,163 600 5 Hoang Thu Pho 9,905 67 2,950 95 3 ______Ta Van Chu 7,650 51 3,732 120 3 Na Hoi 724 62 6,218 221 3 16. Bao Yen Cam Con 13,652 136 20,568 710 7 ___ __Nghia Do 6,350 104 32,890 1,069 5 ____ _ 17. Sa Pa Ban Khoan 16,830 225 16,176 598 4 Ban Phung 13,277 180 9,386 346 3 ___.___ Lao Chai 2,120 20 9,200 275 3 San Xa Ho 3,500 31 17,500 516 3 L ______L______| Thanh Phu 6,500 5 12,380 384 3

-7 New MV No of MV LV No of LV No of Province Districts Commune (m) poles (m) poles substations |_____ 18. Si Ma Cai Can Ho 5,837 41 6,061 196 3 |__ Quan Than San 3,916 32 7,591 245 2 19. Van Ban Son Thuy 15,915 161 19,748 594 3 Tham Duong 5,046 49 9,944 317 3 _ Dan Thang 9,419 88 3,120 109 2 ______Nam Ma 1,875 22 1,550 58 1 ______20. Bat Xat Nam Pung 8,555 82 11,573 406 3 ______Den Thang 7,655 81 14,725 451 3 ______Pa Cheo 8,015 ____ 84 9,554 328 3 TOTAL 638,081 5,977 650,241 20,641 _ _ _

(? - -- -- m m - - - m - m - m - m -

2.3. BRIEF DESTCRIPTION OF NATURAL AND SOCIAL CONDISTION OF THE PROJECT'S PROVINCES Table 2.3. Brief description of natural conditions of Project Provinces Lai Chau and Dien Bien province Lao Cai province Ha Giang (Former Lai Chau province) Geographical position North West North East North East Topography Hilly mountainous mixed with plain area Hilly, mountainous mixed with plain area Hilly, mountainous mixed with plain area I !imate Tem1perature 16.7 to 26.7 00 - Temperature 16.3to 28.5 °C Temperature 16.3 to 28.5 °C Humidity 72 to 80% 81 to 85% 81 to 85% Protected areas 1. Muong Nhe Nature Reserve is located 1. Hoang Lien Son - Sa Pa Nature 1. Bac Me Proposed Nature Reserve is in Muong Te and Muong Lay district- Lai Reserve is located in San Sa Ho, Lao located in Bac Me district. Chau province. Chai, Ta Van and Ban Ho communes - Sa 2. Bat Dai Son Proposed Nature Reserve 2. Muong Phan CuItLIral and Historical site Pa district, Lao Cai province. is located in Ban Dai Son, Can Ty and is located in Dien Bien Dong district - Dien Thanh Van communes- Quan Ba district. Bien Province. 3. Phong Quang Nature Reserve is located in Vi Xuyen and Quan Ba district. 4. Du Gia Nature Reserve is located in Du Gia commune, Yen Minh district; Minh Son comniune, Bac Me district and Tung Ba commune, Vi Xuyen district 5. Tay Con Linh I Proposed Nature Reserve is located within Phuong Tien, Thanh Thuy, Thanh Duc, Xin Chai and Lao Cai communes, Vi Xuyen district. 6. Tay Con Linh II Proposed Nature Reserve lies within Cao Bo and Quang Ngan communes, Vi Xuyen district; Tung San communle, Hoang Su Phi district. Communes that are located in San Sa Ho, Lao Chai communes are Thuong Tan commune- Bac Me district is protected areas located in Hoang Lien Son- Sa Pa Nature located in Bac Me proposed Nature Non of the Project's commune is located in Reserve. Reserve. buffer zone or core zone of the Protected _- areas Total area (ha) of the provinces 16,919.2 8,057.1 7,884.4 Main land use patterns - 2002 data . Agricultural land __ _ 8.9% 11.5% 17.1% Forestry land and land covered by trees 32.7% 34.1% _ 43.3% Specially used land 0.5% 1.5% 0.8%

Homestead land _ - 0.2% 0.3% 0.6% Evidence of air and noise pollution Non Non Non [Evidence of water pollution______Non Non l Non * A ccording to the orovincioal czii;i ul enviro)mnentul r-eport mnade by DoNREsfirom 2000, 2001, 1 ' and Statistical Yearbook 2002

inI - - - m - m m m m m m m m - m - m m m m

Table. 2.4. Socio-economic conditions of the Project's provinces Lai Chau and Dien Bien province Lao Cai province Ha Giang (Former Lai Chau province)

2 Population (persons) and density (persons/kiM ) - 2002 data 35 person/km2 74 person/kM2 77 person/km 2 Ethnic minorities Tay, Nung, Muong, San Diu, Dao etc. Tay, Nung, Muong, San Diu, Dao etc. Tay, Nung, Muong, San Diu, Dao etc. Structure of income per household per year and by sources of income for north mountain and mid land including these four provinces (According to Vietnam living standard survey, 2000) Agricultural and Forestry activities 60.23% Non-Farm Self employment 16.80 % Wages 8.88% Pension, subsidies, scholarship 4.31% Other 9.79% Cultural and Historical sites in Project's communes (According to Map of Nature Conservation area of Vietnam, 2000) There is Dien Bien historical and cultural No No site in Muong Phang district of Dien Bien province. This site is out of Project's areas.

.,1 2.4. SOME OF MAIN TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE PROJECT The Project will be consistcd of MV distribution line, distribution substations, LV distribution line and electricity meters.

Mediniin voltaq,e distributtionifinte | Voltage: 35 kV, 22kV Type of distribution line: Overhead line * Pole: Centrifugal cement pole 12m, 14m, 16m, 20 m * Foundation: Concrete M150, pouring at the site Distributionszubstationi

Voltagc: 3 5/0.4; 22/0.4 Type of substation: Hang on type Capacity of the transformers: 31.5 - 250 kVA | Pole Centrifugal cement pole types LT- 1OB; LT- 12B I . Foundation: Concrete M150, pouring at the site Lowv voltaqe distributtioni linie Volatge: 380/220 V I Conductor: Aluminum coated by PVC Pole: H letter pole 7.5 m; 8.5 m For poles with long span I (overcome roads) the height is 10 m to 12 m I Founldation: Concrctc MlIOO, pouring at the sitc Electricitv mneters

Type of meter: I phase meter and 3 phase low voltage meter Box: Composite box hang on LV poles l 12 I l l

3 2.5. MAIN WORKLOADS FOR THE PROJECT Mediumiii voltaq,e distributtionz linle Total length: 638.08 krm Amount of conductors: 457.05 tonls Amount of poles: 5,954 poles - 7,145 tons Steel construction: 1,043 tons Concrete for foundation: 10,246 m3

ROWs: 3,581,598 m2 Permanent land occupation: 28,055 m2 Sutbstations Total of substations: 189 Substations 35/0.4 kV: 185 Substation 22/0.4 kV: 4 Number of transformers: 189 Relays and protection equipment: 189 sets Centrifugal poles: 378 poles- 312 tons Steel structures: 295.3 tons Concrete for foundation: 297.7 m3 Lowv voltag,e distributtion linte Total length: 650,241 km Amount of conductors: 453.4 tons

Amount of poles: 20,915 poles - 14.640 tonls Stccl construction: 165.3 tons Concrete for foundation: 14,406 mn3 Electricitpineters

Number of meters: 20,131 Number of boxes: 8,443 boxes I * ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~13 11 l l

3. LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR PROJECT'S ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 3.1. VIETNAM REGULATIONS AND LAWS | - Law on Protection of the Environment (LEP) was enacted in 1993. - Decree 175/CP was promulgated in 1994 to guide implementation of the LEP and provides broad guidelines for division of responsibility among Ministries: environmenital impact assessments; pollution prevention and disaster control; sources of finance: and environmental inspections and standards. I - Decrees 143 on amendment of Item 14 of Decree 175 CP dated 18/10/1994 of Government on guidance for implementation of LEP. - Circular No. 490 "Guidance on setting up and appraising environmental impact assessment reports for investment projects". - Law on Forest Protection (1992). This law regulates forest management, protection, I development, and exploitation, prevention of woodcutting, and forest destruction. It also encourages individuals and organizations to protect and develop forests. - Decree 54/1999/ND-CP relating to the protection of ligh-voltage networks.

- Decree 70/1987-HDBT specifies safety casements of high-voltage transmission lines.

- Decree 24/2000/ND-CP specifies the implementation on the Law on Foreign Investment I* in Vietnam (Article 82) concerning environmental protection. - Decree 52/1999/ND-CP includes environmental considerations for construction *| management.

- Decree 26/1996/CP provides regulations on the punishment of administr-ative violation of * Environmental Protection Law. - Vietnam National standards (TCVN) are national standards established by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MoST) and applied to all government agencies. They include I engineering, construction, scientific, and environmental standards. TCVN environmental standards include acceptable limits of many air, noise, and water quality parameters. - 11 TCN-1984 sets the standard for minimum clearance between live parts of a line and trees.

3.2. WORLD BANK SAFEGUARD POLICIES

- OP 4.01 Environmental Assessment; - OP 4.04 Natur-al Habitats; - OP 4.11 Cultural Property; - BP 17.50 Public Disclosures.

Detailed guidance on assessment methodologies and common impacts associated with transmission projects are found in:

. World Bank, 1991. Environmental Assessment Sourcebook. Volume 3.

1

* 14 I U

| ~~~~*IFC, 1998. I,nvironmnental, Health, and Safety Guidelines on Electric Power Transmission and Distribution. * Framework for Applying Environment Safeguards to Rural Energy II Project. l l l l

I I I l I

* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~15 l l

4.4. SCREENING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 4.1. CLASSIFICATION OF IMPACTS The Environmental Impact Assessment focuses on the major environmental issues of the Project's Most Favoured Alternative. The potential impacts of the Project's pre- construction, construction, and operation phases were assessed as being in one of five | categories:

i. NO IMPACT. The potential impact of the Project activity is assessed as NO IMPACT if the project activity is physically removed in space or time from the environmental cormponenc. I ii. MAJOR IMPACT. An impact is said to be MAJOR if the project activity has potential to affect an environmental component. Major impacts could be "Major | Negative" or "Major Positive." The following criteria were used to determine whether a given impact is MAJOR: a) Spatial scale of the impact (site, local, regional, or national/ international); b) Time horizon of the impact (slhort, medium, or long term); c) Magnitude of the change in the environmental component brought about by the Project activities (small, moderate, large); d) Importance to local human populations; | e) Compliance with national, provincial, or district environmental protection laws, standards, and fegulations | f) Compliance with Vietnam's international commitments. These includc the Convention oni Wctl nncIs of Ilitcrnntionl.1 Jrmportanec ospcei ,lly LLi Waterfowl Habitat (RAMSAR), the Convention Concerning the Protection * of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (World Heritage Convention), and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild | Fauna and Flora (CITES); and g) Compliance with World Bank guidelines, policies, and regulations. iii. MINOR IMPACT. If an impact occurs but does not meet the criteria for a Major Impact it is assigned the category MINOR. Minor impacts could be "Minor negative" or "Minor Positive." I MITIGABLE IMPACT. The potential impact of a project activity on an environmeantal component is said to be MITIGABLE if there is potential for a major negative impact and the proposed mitigation measure will prevent the impact or reduce the impact to acceptable levels.

* 16 11 l l

| 4.2. IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT The Project wil play an important role in the electrification program and in implementation of the policy of poverty alleviation of 16 communes within 4 Project's provinces. It will also promote the policy of industrialization and modernization of the Government of Vietnam as well as create a great opportunity for overall socio-economic development of the poor area. W;hen the distributtion lines are constructed, there is a trend of local people to move to live near the lines. The local people committee will have a proper planning accordingly to support the development of the areas. These planning are included: road, residential area, industrial development and farming etc. The communes/districts or provinces will move towvard its planning. These positive socio-economic values of the project are great. Refer to the Projcct Document for more details. Beside thie significant beneficial impacts, the project may cause different adverse impacts on the environment and local socio-economy. By using Environmental Screening I Data Checklist and Environmental baseline Checklist as guided in Framework for Applying Environment Safeguards to Rural Energy I Project, The potential impacts of the Project are described in Table 4.1. l l I I I I I I l * ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~17 I m m m m - - - m m m - m m m m m m m -

Table 4.1. The assessment of Project's impacts

Vo Imllpact IIo^iiguiilkl, Duration Description f the imiipacts Evalitationt

Pre-constru-ctioH 1hcis- 1 Permanent anld temporary land Medium Short Refer to Table 4.2 and 4.3 for more informationi Mitigable acquisimon0 __ Long j and supporting data 2 Impact on Project affected Mediumii Short Refer to Table 4.4. for supporting data Mitigable householdd

3 Impacts associated with clearing Small Long, - All of parts of trees that are highler thaan 4in nieed Mitigable the ROW to be cut. Thle trees are still remained. - The lines are nlot going through any forested areas or areas with highly ecological value. - Acquired lanids are mlainly unused land alonig the ______existingu roa(Is vitlh very low ecological values. 4 Health aisk due to explosives, None None - The area has no laidmincs or explosive material No impact chemical hazard remaining iroml the past time 5 Loss of historical and cultural None None - The routes arc designed to not effect any cultural No Impact properties h_eritages Conistrucwtioni phI(ise

6 Surface water contairmin ationi Medium Shor-t - The water canl be miore turbid due to the soil Mitigable residue froml excavationi of the pole's foundation will entcr to tlle wvater bodies by water run off. 7 Noise alh vibrationi Smnall Slhort - Noise anld viblrationi are caLused by: equiplllellt, Minor material transpor tationi, proj ect's vehicles, pole's Negative crection and cable's pullifng, generators (if there is

______an_y) ______8 Soil erosion 'MediumlnM Short - Soil excavation1 for pole's founldationi; Minor

I - Not necessary to create any access roads becauseC Ngative ______L_ _ ihe lncs are_on-oly -orhig alonig the existing roads. _ ___

I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~IS - m m m - m m m m m - m ------

Vo Imiipact Maginitiude Diur ationi Descr)iption of tihe impacts Evaluationt _f ilmlEacts 9 Air pollutioni Small Shlort - Dust genierated from soil excavation, especially Minor durling dry seasons. Negative 10 Agricultural production due to Small Medium - Some of productive land will be required for a Minor tempor-ary acquisition of slhort period for constru-ctioll. Negative productive land - Refer to Table 4.2 and 4.3 for supportin!g data

11 Traffic disturbance Small Slhort - Transportation of material and equipmenlt, soil Minor excavation and cable pulling activities wvill disturb Negative the normiial traffic in the areas durillg short period of time; - Long distance transportationi from the port to xvare-lhouse of Project owvner is carTied out special truck acccrding to packaging of goods, equipmenlt;

- Transportationi of goods, equipments, materials from the ware-lhouse of the Project's oxvner to constructioln sites is carTied out by 5-7.5 tons trucks. - Poles are transported by Kawaz trucks. Cemeniits, steel constructioll, Sand anid other construLctioI materials are transported by 5 tons truck; - Manuial transportation is used for slhort distances. 12 Road degradation Medium Sholt - Heavy loaded vehicles migilt degrade the existing Mitigable roads, wvhichL usually are not very good in rulal areas.

13 Biodiversity loss Smuall Slhort to - Somc of trees will need to be cut. But tlhcse trees Minor Medium are commlllloII planted species like industrial or fi-uit trees. - Somie of insects are smlall animlials wvill lose tleir hlabitat btut lhe insects anid animlials are commllon ______species._Area of loose habitats is smnlall in

1 1^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i - - m - - m m m m ------m

NVo Imppact Magnitudle Dulrmutioun Descrip ftion of tihe iutipacts Eoaluationm 0f in uacts comparisoni with entil-e affectecd ecosystem. Main ecosystemis that are affected by the Project is agricultural, plantcd forest of industrial trees, shrub trees along the roads etc.

- Two project's commultine (San Sa 1-To and Lao Chal communles) arc located in 1-oang Lien Son - Sapa Nature Reserve of Lao Cal province. Main Project's activities are listed in Table 4.6. The impacts on nature reserve are considered as non-significant due to the fact that the Project will be carried out along the rural tranlsportation roads, in places with higlh htuman touch such as agricultural land, pulic land, . near houses.no access road need to be newly created etc. Sce Table 4.6 and Paragraplh 4.3.2. for more information.

- One project's commitune in Ha Giang province named Thuong Tan is located in Bac Me proposed nature reserve. Main activities and impacts are described in Table 4.7. The impact in tcrm of loss of biodiversity is considr-ed also as non-significant due to the main reasons that Project will be can-ied out in places witlh high- humlLani touclh such as agricultural land, pulic land, near houses.... no access road need to be newly created etc. See 'rable 4.7 an(d Paragraplh 4.3.4. for more inforimiation.

14 Solid waste gener-ated from soil Small Short - The soil anid constLuctioni materials can remain in Minor cxcavation the site. Negative 15 Einvironmiiental iimpacts caused Small Mediulll - One constl-uctioln crew will be wvorkincg for Projcct Mitigable by constructioln worker in oiie Co01111UnlC.

- Caml)psite LSually locate(i in area ofCcomm1111ulle's - - m m - m - m m - m m - m - m - m m

No I-mpact Magnitude Duirationi Description of the imilpacts Evaliation _ ~~~~~~~ofijim acts people committee. The campsite includes I temaporary liousc for workers, I closcd ware-h1ouse (estimated area is about 70 mi) and one open 2 storage area (200 mn ) - Solid waste, wastewater disposal and hiygiene condition. - Possible disseminationi of certain diseases from constructioll workers to local people and vice versa. 16 Conflict between construction Small Medium - Difference in incomes, cultures, behaviors Minor worker and local people Negative 1 7 Health and Safety Mediu1m Slhort - Accidents might lhappei during construction if the Mitigable safety issues are not *vell considered. 18 Operationi phase Development and poverty Large Long - Increase the quality of life for local peoples. Major alleviation - Support agricultural production, slhrimp farinig Positive and other services including health and education 19 Habitat fragmenitationi and Smnall Long - No new road or access roads are constructed Minor increase access to wild lands - No line crossing the forest, wetland or other Negative natur-al lhabitats. 20 Healtlh and safety Small Long - Electric slhock and accidcnts occurrinig if the Mitigable proper safety issues are not paid proper attention_ 21 Reductioni of air pollutants Medium Long - Wlhen the electricity is available, the price will be Major genierated by diesel generators cheaper tlhan uSing diesel gcnerator, so the positive substanitial amounit of air pollutants (NO,, SO\, CO2...) are reduced - The production1 cost will be reduced 22 EMF None None - Witl voltage just up to 35 kV, the EMF is not a probleml2. - m - m - Mm mm m m m m m m m - m m m m m

No hImpact Mag-n itlde Dilurationi Descriiptiom, of the imupacts Evalmiation of illtpacts 23 Impacts on1aircrafts None None - The heighlt of pole is less tlhan 50 m (Usually thcy No Impact are 10, 12, 14 m). Tlhere will not be any problemn with avian and aircrafts 24 Oil lhazardous waste Small Long - No remzoval of old transfornmers, so the risk of No Impact contaminaationi PCBs containing oil will be occurred. - No PCBs containing Gil and other hazardous chcmiiicals will be used.

- Oil refilling should be done in workshop

22 I I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I ~~~~Table 4.2. Permnanent Land Acquisition (in) Agricultural Districts Residentia, Rice field Dry crop Garden Forest Others DIEN BIEN PROVINCE 1. Dien Bien 3.12 73.03 3.96 19.66 1,263.87 34.46 2. Muong Nhe 3.79 20.35 39.82 24.34 1,248.94 1.46 3. Tuan Giao 23.09 87.34 23.54 208.85 295.14 9466.27 4. Tua Chua 14.77 _ 251.08 3.42 48.15 163.15 51.55 5. Muong Lay 21.78 30.32 7.13 45.22 426.08 6.66 HA GIANG PROVINCE 6. Xin Man 52.79 1,363.30 1,612.29 243.73 878.69 128.88 7. Bac Quang 14.06 25.26 22.23 56.78 1,772.37 141.85 8. Yen Minh 56.22 443.77 95.55 148.29 876.18 2,002.62

10. Bac Me 19.78 12.82 44.02 32.04 19.50 1,819 11. Quang Binh 5.41 263.46 164.47 100.38 1,353.85 397.43 LAI CHAU PROVINCE 12. Phong Tho 25.97 700.41 128.04 51.69 847.87 89.10 13. Sin Ho 57.89 355.04 116.35 670.32 F749.38 865.841 14. Muong Te 99.18 907.39 617.49 188.37 2,493.161 118.99 LAO CAI PROVINCE I 15. Bac Ha f 100.62 1,015.15 572.93 621.43 516.68 1,287.04 16. Bao Yen 39.54 266.74 225.38 255.26 1,109.64 658.18 | 17. Sa Pa 73.16 282.13 137.32 158.86 1,381.30 2,554.61 18. Si Ma Cai 22.15 405.43 242.29 173.42 211.74 41.09 19. Van Ban 37.27 233.41 196.18 194.13 1,148.64 528.79 20. Bat Xat 9.31 244.36 102.83 245.15 406.14 1,973.851

23 IZ U I

Table 4.3. Temporary Land Acquisition (mi2 ) Province/district TotaI Rice field Dry crop Garden Forest Others I DIEN BIEN PROVINCE _ 1. Dien Bien 720,684 10,724 1,843 34,027 620,982 53,107 3 2.Muong Nhe 270,997 576 1,129 3,450 265,633 206 3. Tuan Giao 101,115 1,549 417 18,524 39,266 41,356 I 4. Tua Chua 49,957 6,345 86 6,084 30,926 6,514 5. Muong Lay | 52,336 454 106 3,388 47,888 499 HA GIANG PROVINCE I 6.Xin Man 177,321 13,722 25,842 8,538 118,590 10,627 7. Bac Quang 239,833 422 371 4,750 222,420 11,867 8. Yen Minh 306,468 7,513 1,646 12,698 113,205 171,404 9. Dong Van 77,291 422 371 4,750 222,420 11,867 10. Bac Me 214,169 290 996 3.625 3,310 205,946 11. Quang Binh 60,009 4,020 2,509 | 7,659 15,495 30,324 LAI CHAU PROVINCE _ * 12. PhongTho 15,65 1nn7- .. ! -! 1729,5,6 1 - 47, 13. Sin Ho 245,105 7,715 j 2,8133 3,319 142,217 89,039 14. Muong Te = 8,972 18,425 26,264 557,790 18,381 LAO CAI PRO\IINCE 15. Bac Ha 442,102 8,470 10,892 23,353 253,434 145,9501 16. BaoYen 199,350 3,793 3,197 21,517 121,223 49,617 17. Sa Pa 436,144 5,021 2,171 11,238 176,306 241,406 18. Si Ma Cai 58,258 7,069 4,512 16,007 26,919 3,750 19. Van Ban 254,878 4,670 3,848 19,304 173,031 542,307 20. Bat Xat 245,537 4,553 1,810 4,207 55,369 179,596 I' I'

1 9~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4 I I I

Table 4.4. Number of Affected Households

Affected households Province Districts Permanent Temporary Total 1. Dien Bien 1. Dien Bien 1 22 23 2. Muong Nhe 1 26 27 3. Tuan Giao 8 102 110 ______4. Tua Chua 5 63 68 5. Muong lIay 7 20 27 2. Ha Giang 6. Xin Man 18 240 258 7. Bac Quang 5 28 33 8. Yen Minh 19 109 128 9. Dong Van 3 58 61 10. Bac Me 7 25 32 *______11. Quang Binh 2 71 73 3. Lai Chau 12. Phong Tho 9 103 112 13. Sin Ho 19 69 88 14. Muong Te 33 268 301 4. Lao Cai 15. Bac Ha 33 213 246 16. Bao Yen 13 143 156 ______17. Sa Pa 24 92 116 18. Si Ma Cai 7 138 145 19. Van Ban 12 140 152 20. Bat Xat 3 53 56 2 I I I' I I 25 I l

I ~~~~Table. 4.5. Number of trees to be cut by the Project______Province Districts Number of trees Main type of trees 1. Dien Bien 1. Dien Bien 3,889 Bamboos and others 2. Muong Nhe 3,787 Bamboos and others 2,132 Bamboos, bananas I 3.Tuan Giao and others 4. Tua Chua 664 Bamboos and others l 5. Muong Lay 1,359 Bamboos and others 3,259 Bamboos, 2. Ha Giang bananas, 6. Xin Man grapes and others * 5,686 Bamboos, bananas, 7. Bac Quang grapes and others l 6,859 Bamboos, bananas, l______8. Yen Minh grapes and others 1,707 Bamboos, bananas, 9. Dong Van grapes and others 3,747 Bamboos, bananas, 10. Bac Me grapes and others 5,007 Bamboos, bananas, 11. Quang Binh grapes and others 2,798 Bamboos, * 3. Lai Chau bananas 12. Phong Tho and others 4,986 Bamboos, bananas, 13. Sin Ho grapes and others 15,785 Bamboos, bananas, 14. Muong Te _ grapes and_others I 4,494 Bamboos, 4. Lao Cai bananas, 15. Bac Ha grapes and others 5,029 Bamboos, bananas, 16. Bao Yen grapes and others 9,493 Bamboos, bananas, 17. Sa Pa grapes and others _ 976 Bamboos, bananas, 18. Si Ma Cai grapes and others l 4,793 Bamboos, bananas, 19. Van Ban grapes and others 5,536 Bamboos, bananas, ______20. Bat Xat grapes and others

I 26 I I l l

4.3. PROJECT'S IMPACT ON PROTECTED AREAS As it was reported in Section 2.3, the Project will be carried out in San Sa Ho and Lao Chai commune of Hoang Lien Son- Sa Pa nature reserve of Lao Cai province. In Ha Giang province, the Thuong Tan commune (the Project commune), Bac Me district is located in Pac Me proposed nature reservc.

4.3.1. HOANG LIEN SON - SAPA NATURE RESERVE Conservation status Hoang Lien Son- Sa pa Nature Reserve is located in San Sa Ho, Lao Chai, Ta Van and Ban Ho commune, Sapa district, Lao Cai province. Hoang Lien Son- Sa Pa Nature Reser-ve (then called Nui Hoang Lien) was included in Decision NO 194/CT of the Chairman of the Council of Ministers, dated 9 August 1986 (MARD, 1997). This decision decreed the establishment of a 5,000 ha nature reserve for the protection of "high mountain forests, mono-Fokieiiia hodginisii stands and valuable medicinal herbs" (Cao Van Sung, 1995). An investment plan, prepared in 1993, defined a 29,845 ha nature reserve in Sa Pa and Than Uyen districts (Anon, 1993). In 1997, the area in Than Uyen district was placed under the management of the Song Da Watershed Protection Forest management board. An investment plan for the revised nattre reserve was prepared in 1997, which gave the area of the nature reserve as 19.991 ha (Nguyen Quang Hung et al.1997). Te boundary of the nature reserve was revised again in 1998 to include areas in Ban Ho commune, and the area of the nature reserve calculated from a digitized version of the current boundary is 24,658 ha (Tordoff et al. 1999).

Topography and hydrology Hoang Lien Son- Sa pa Nature Reserve is located in the Hoang Lien Son mountains, which are an extension of the Ailao Shan mountains in China, thle south- eastern extent of the Himalayan chain. The nature reserve is located on the north-east flank of these mountains and includes Vietnam's highest peak, Mount (3,143 m). The lowest point is 380 m but most of the nature reserve lies above 1,000 m. the flanks of the mountains are very steep. Between Mount Fansipan and Sa Pa town, lies the Muong Hoa valley, whiclh becomes wider towards the east of the nature reserve (Tordcff et al. 1999).

HoIang Lien Son- Sa Pa Nature Ikeserve is drained by the Muong lloa and Tia Trulng I-lo rivers, whiichi feed the Nanl Po river and, finally, the Red River. Forest in the nature reserve has an essential role in water catchments protection, particularly forest at high elevations, which captures water by condensation and contributes it to stream flow (Tordoff et al. 1999).

Biodiversity value Hoang Lien Son - Sa Pa Nature Reserve contains 11,071 ha of natural forest (Tordoff et al. 1999). Variations in altitude, topography, hydrology and micro-

27 I1 l l

climate within the nature reserve have produced a wide variety of habitat types, which can be broadly classified into scrub, savanna, submontane deciduous forest, sub-alpine forest and dwarf bamboo (Tordoff et al. 1999). Plant species richness (2,024 known species of vascular plants) and levels of endemism (one quarter of Vietnam's endemic species) are both very high relative to other protected areas in Vietnam (Nguyen Nghia Tlin and Nguyen Thi Thoi 1998). For these reasons, the site was selected as a Center for Plant Diversity by the IUCN Plant Conservation Programme (Davis et al. eds. 1995).

Mammal diversity and abundance are relatively low as a result of intensive hunting pressure. However, Hoang Lien Son - Sa Pa Nature Reserve supports a high diversity of other animal groups. Three hundred and forty seven bird species have been recorded in and around the nature reserve, including several species that are endemic to the area. Invertebrate's diversity is also very high, and many species of invertebrates discovered at the site are known from nowhere else in the world (Tordoffet al. 1999)

In the Biodiversity Action Plan for Vietnam, Hoang Lien Son- Sa Pa Nature Reserve is rated "A" for biodiversity value (the highest rating) (Government of SRV/GEF 1994).

Conservation issues Over-exploitation of natural resources, together with clearance of land for cultivation and by accidental fire, is rapidly destroying the natural vegetation cover of Hoang Lien Son- Sa pa Nature Reserve. Already, natuLral forest covcrs less than half the area of the nature reserve, and continued human disturbance threatens those areas that remain. Where forest has been cleared or bunnt, soil fertility has decreased, and it will be a long time before the forest regenerates (Tordoff et al. 1999).

Cardamom Anzomwlitn1 aron7aticwan cultivation, timber extraction and the collection of non-timber forest product are leading to detcrioration in forest quality and changes in species composition. However, the long- term effects of these activities wiII be less severe as, firstly, some canopy cover remains, and, secondly, nutrients arc not lost through erosion. If these activitics cease, the forest may be able to rccovcr rlcativcly rapidly (Toldoff et al. 1999).

The natulC reserve has bccn established andid a managemcnt board has been formlcd. A hcadquarters building has been built, the boundaries of the naturc reserve I have been demarcated, and signboards have been posted displaying nature reserve regulations. The staff of the nature reserve is currently implementing fire-prcvention activities. 'rhey are also implementing forest management schemes to a greater or lesser degree. However, beyond fire prevention and social forestry, the nature reserve staff does not have any resources to enforce nature reserve regulations, although a

28 I request for funding for this and other activities has been submitted to central I government and is awaiting a response (Tordoff et al. 1999).

4.3.2. PROJECT'S ACTIVITIES IN HOANG LIEN SON - SAPA NATURE RESERVE Project's activities in San Sa Ho and Lao Chai communes are briefly described as follows: Table 4.6. Main Project's activities in Hoang Lien Son - Sa Pa Nature _C ~~~Reserve C Activities/Items Lao Chai San Sa ho Permanent occupied residential 21.07 16.07 land (m2) Permanent occupied forest land 116.22 577.36 (m2) % with toral area of the Nature <0.0003 % Reserve -Number of trees to be cut (in total): 1,135 2,323 Bamboos 349 1,732 Mango 27 1 Guava 18 0 Coconuts 26 0 Jackfruit 21 0 l Bananas 84 2 Grave 35 1 Other trees 575 587 -Temporary occupied land (m 2) 41,892.19 82,633.84 Rice field 840.78 678.09 Dry crop field 354.55 569.63 Garden land 9,496.78 189.62 Forest land 11,776.00 . 60.641 I % with total area of the Nature <0.005 % reserve Other land 19,424.08 20,555.12 New MV line (m) 2,120 3,500 Number of MV poles 20 31 I New LV line (m) 9,200 17,500 No of LV poles 275 516 l-No of hang on substation 3 3

The above-mentioned data describes project's components, activities that will I be carried out in Lao Chai and San Sa Ho communes. These communes are part of Hoang Lien Son - Sa Pa Nature Reserve. The main Project's environmental impacts are similar as impacts shown in Table 4. 1. Rural I distribution network will be mainly constructed along the existing rural roads. Trees that will be cut by Project are mainly bamboos and fruit tree. The | Project does not encroach any dense forest or dense vegetation cover.

D~. I'

Mitigation measures proposed by this EMP are adequate to control and minimize the impacts caused by Project in these sensitive communes in term of protection of biodiversity in Protected area.

4.3.3. BAC ME PROPOSED NATURE RESERVE AND THUONG TAN COMMUNE

Conservation status In 1994, Ha Giang provincial DERD prepared an investment plan for I Bac Me, which proposed establishing a 27,800 ha Special-use Forest, comprising a strict protection area of 9,450 ha, a forest rehabilitation area of 17,125 ha and an administration and service area of 1,225 ha. This investment plan was approved by MARD, by Official Letter No. 88/NL-TL dated 8 March 1994, and by Ha Giang Provincial People's Committee, by Decision No 143/UB-QD dated 22 April 1994. Following this, a management board was established by the provincial people's committee on 24 November 1994 (Bac Me Forest Enterprise 2000).

The precise Special-use Forest category of Bac Me is not clear. Bac Me Forest Enterprise (2000) states that the site is both a nature reserve and a cultural and historical sire. However, Bac Me is included on the 2010 list as a 27,800 ha nature reserve, including 14,768 ha of forest (FPD 1998). The site is currently under the management of the provincial DARD (Bac Me Forest Enterprise 2000).

| Topography and hydrology

Bac Me proposed nature reserve is situated in Bac Me district in south- I eastern Ha Giang province. The topography of the proposed nature reserve is mountainous, and there are several peaks above 1000 m, the highest of which is 1,420 m, on the border with Tuyen Quang province. The lowest point in the - proposed nature reserve is less than 200m.

Stream originating in the north and west of the proposed nature reserve feed the Gam river, which flows south, into Tuyen Quang province, and eventually meets the Lo river. Streams originating in the south-east of the proposed nature reserve feed the Pao Nam river, a tributary of the Gam river.

Biodiversity value So far there is no exact informnation on biodiversity value of the Bac Me Proposed Nature Reserve.

Conservation issues A total of 6,443 people live inside the proposed nature reserve. The majority I of these people belong to the Hmong, Tay and Dao ethnic groups. These people practice both fixed and shifting cultivation inside the proposed nature reserve: there are 411 ha of wet rice land and 884 ha of hill agricultural land

30 l

inside the boundary of the proposed nature reserve. Bac Me proposed nature I reserve only has two members of staff and a single guard station (Bac Me Forest Enterprise 2000).

* 4.4.4. PROJECT'S ACTIVITIES IN BAC ME PROPOSED NATURE RESERVE One Project's commune - Thuong Tan commune is located inside Bac Me Proposed Nature Reserve. The main activities and components are described I in Table 4.7.

Table 4.7. Main Project's activities in Thuong Tan commune Activities/Items Thuong Tan commune Permanent occupied residential land 19.78 (m2) -Permanent occupied forest land (m 2) 19.5 % with total area of the Proposed <0.0001% Nature Reserve * Number of trees to be cut: 3,747 Bamboos 59 l Mango 6 Guava 4 Coconuts 18 l Jackfruit 15 Bananas 60 l Grave 25 Other 795 -Temporary occupied land (mi) 214,169.03 I Rice field 290.7 Dry crop field 996.31 Garden land 3.625.82 Forest land 3,310.53 % with total area of the Proposed <0.002 % Nature Reserve Other land 205.946.31 -New MV line (m) 27,150 * Number of MV poles 158 New LV line (m) 19,700 No of LV poles 603 No of hang on substation 6

The above-mentioned data describes project's components, activities that will be carried out in Thuong Tan commune. This commune is inside Bac Me Proposed Nature Reserve. The main Project's environmental impacts are I* similar as impacts shown in Table 4.1. Rural distribution network will be mainly constructed along the existing rural roads. Trees that will be cut by Project are mainly bamboos and fruit tree.

I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~31 l

I ~~~~~~Mitigation measures proposed by this EMP are adequate to control and minimize the impacts caused by Project in these sensitive communes in term 3 ~~~~~ofprotection of biodiversity in Protected area. I I I

l

I' I' I l l I

1 32 I I

I 5. PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND DISCLOSURE During project preparation stage (2004), the following activities were carried out:

Activity 1: Information & Discussion with Local Authorities on the Line Route Activity 2: In-pact Survey and Statistics U Activity 3: Meetings with PAHs When the survey was completed, District Compensation Committee (in coordination with the commune officials) held meetings with PAHs having land in * the line ROW and with village representatives. During the meetings, the Consultant presented numerous materials, including: Project Summary, draft RAP and draft EIA, maps of the project site, figures, tables, photos, pictures, and other support materials. Meeting officials informed participants of the Project purpose; prescnted the Project impacts on land and crops in detail; introduced the principles and policies of compensation and advised people not to build new structures in the line ROW. PAHs xvere consulted on the entitlement policy, property affected, and the compensation amount to each household. Questions posed by the PAHs were addressed and recommendations/concerns of PAHs and PCI were recorded.

Activity 4: Receiving Further Feedback from PAHs

Activity 5: Public disclosure and Clearance on EIA The Project will receive an investment license only after appropriate modification of location, design, capacity and/or technology of the project to meet the requirement of environmental protection and resettlement. To address disclosure requirements of OP 4.01, PCI will:

| Provide Vietnamese-language copies of the EIA report, RAP, and Project Summary to each commune-level and provincial-level People's Committee in the Project area. | Advertise in major local newspapers several times over a two-month period. The advertisement will state the EIA, RAP, and Project Summary is available for public review for a two month period during normal working hours at the followving locations: 1) the provinicial-levcl Pcoplc's Committccs; anl 2) Thc commune1LllC lcvcl Icoplcs' Comm1ittecs. | Englislh and ViCtnamese-language copics of tlhe IA report will also bc sClnt to the Vietnam Information Developmenit Centre at 63 Ly Thai To in , for access by NGOs and public. I English language copies of the EIA report will be sent to World Bank for publication on World Bank Info Shop.

I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~3 !I 1 , l l

Summary of Records from Public Consultation during pre-construction phase - Construction work should carry out in dry season, after harvesting; I - Contractor should clean and return construction sites to the previous condition; - Consultant should inform local about construction work as soon as they can so |l people can have a plan to harvest agricultural products in their affected lands. - Pole should not be erected in the gate of houses |- Warning sign for power pole system should be hang on - Avoid carrying out construction work in steep sites to avoid soil erosion. - Project owner should pay compensation before construction period. - Contractors and Consultants should inform soon about land acquisition so affected peoples can have their working plan in un- affected land |- Consultants should carefully consider the pole's position; avoid erecting the pole inside garden, near houses, or residential areas. - Related parties should consider reducing the electricity tariff for farmers in this 3 area. - Head and responsible people of the villages should convince people to release the land on time for Contractor; - Compensation should be done equally and clearly - There is a need to support households that are heavily affected by the Project - Construction work should be planned to carry out in the shortest time to avoid losses in agricultural production.

| All of the concerns, comments of local people were recorded and considered by consultants and Project's owner during designing of the Project and development of EMP | for the Project. l I I l I l

1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~34 I - - - - m- m m - - - m - - m m -l

6. ENVIRONMENTAL MIANAGEMENT PLAN 6.1. MITIGATION MEASURES Table. 61. Mitigation measures applied for the Project

No y Jpacit Evaliiationi of Alitigation ineasiures applied I ______impacts __ Pre-coanstrtctionzplhase _ Permanent and temporary land Mitigable - Careful site survey, consult with acquisition local peoples for optimum route selection. - Avoid ecologically high value areas (forest, reserve area, wetland etc.). - Proper compensate the impacts. 2 Impact onl Project affected Mitigable - Routes slhould be selected household to minimize the need to relocate houses - Increase the span betweeni towers, increase the tower lheight, use hanging1 substationi etc. to miniimize the impacts oni PAHs. - Compenisate for the impacts. l 3 Impacts associated wvith clearing Mitigable - Work witlh PAHs during clearanice the ROW of ROWs to minimize impacts to surrounding trees and other constructions; - Not allow Usincg any helbicides and defolianit to clear the trees withlini ROWs. ______- Not allow burninlg the wvooden residue after tree cutting. ___ 4 Health risk due to explosives, No Imiipact - Not neccssaiy to apply any mitigation measure chemlical hazard 5 Loss of historical and cultuLal No Impact - Not necessary to apply any mitigationn properties measure. - During constrLctioni and excavation if there is any fouLnd valuable hiistorical or cultural property, the Contractor and Project owiner slhould immiiediately repolt to local ______Departmiien1t of Cultule and Informnation for further considerationl. Coiisti l(ctioii phIse _ _ _ Surface wvater contamination Mitigable - Soil excavation is manag,ed to carr-y out in the shiortest period.

35 - m - m m ------m - m - m -

No Imiipact Evaluation of Mitigationt nieasiires ap)plied

imiipacts __

- Constructioll imiaterial will be kept in the store with cover to protect from rain. - Select a riglht place for concrete mixing. - Residue fronm eartlhwor-k should be removed from the site to proper places (soil residue can use for garden filling; concrete residues are removed by contractor to the penriitted places). 7 Noise and vibration Minor Negative - Use the construction macllines that lhave noise level under permitted limits. - Carefully consider night work. No niglht woork is pcrmitted to carry out in ______populated and sensitive areas like lhospital, residential, student camp. 8 Soil erosion Minor Negative - Excavate and eartlh-movinig activities in erosion prone areas will be schedule in the dry seasons, after the harvest tirne and during the shortest dturatlon of time. - Land surface recovery after the pole erection. 9 Air pollution Minor Negative - Minimize the construction time in each sitc. Spray water regularly on dirt piles and any other areas that could create dust -Use wind fences in case of strong wind. Minimize use of diesel gcnierators. 10 AgricultuLral production due to Minor Negative - Carry out the constr-uctioni work after hiarvest time. temporary acquisition of - Compensate for the loss of agricultural productivity productive land ¢ - Returni the constructioni arcas to the uscful state after the wvork. 11 Traffic disturbance Minor Negative - Minimiiize the constructioln work (excavation, cable pulling) in traffic intensive sites.

- Use warninlg signs in constrLuctioll sites. - Cooperate witlh local autlhor-ity for traffic arrangcmiient. Avoid _high-traffic areas

36 - m - m - m m m m m - m m m - -

No Impact Evalatioiof'f AMitigationi measures (applied impacts 12 Damaging the existing road Mihgable - Constructioll Contractor needs to commit to not use lheavy vehicles that miglht cause system damnage to the existing road system in the area. - Not allow vehicles with lheavy load of constructioni material anid cquipmiienit to enter thie road systemi. Tihe load slhould be separated to acceptable levels that the road can resist for. - Repair the road wheni there is any damage occurTed. 13 Solid waste generated from soil MinorNegative - Construction contractor need to commit to clean the site and disposal solid excavation waste in the permitted places.

14 Environmental impacts caused by Mitigable - Avoid impact in natural forest: 1) Not allow to use to fire in the forested areas; constrLuctioll wor-ker 2) Not allow to use tree and other products of forest for cooking purpose; 3) Prohibited workers from hunting, collecting and poaching any animals or vegetation species. - Minimize the impact of solid waste: Solid waste should be disposed of in a sanitary landfill. Solid waste disposal can be done by contract witlh local Environment and Hygiene services. - Provide portable or pit latrincs to the worker' camps and in the construction sites.

- Provide clean \vater and collect wastewater properly in the camping areas of workers. 15 Conflict between constr-uction MinorNegative - Hire as muclh as possible local citizens for the simple constructionl work to worker anid local people avoid the influx of migrants.

- In cases whcre the worker camaps are near the communies, the Employer could reqtuest that the Contractor provide accurate, timely and regular information about the constructioni team to the People's Committees in affected areas. With open coimnunicationi and informiiationi, the People's Committee and Contractor ______will be able to make a joint informed decision about the manaagemnent of

37 - m - - - - m - m - m - m m m -

No Iotpact Evaluatiolt of I'!itigation 1n easires applie1 impacts constluctioni tcam acconmmodatioln.

- Rectify the impact: The general conditionis of Contract should state: after the Project finished, all camps xvill be completed removed and the campsites will be rectified to their original conditions. 16 Health and Safety Mitigable - Organize the lhealtlh care service in each group of workers. - Inform wvorkcrs the safety regulations and procedures. - Equip safety facilities for the workers. 1 7 Operationtphase_ _ Development and poverty Major Positive - Not necessary to apply any mitigation measure alleviation 18 Habitat fragmenitationi and increase Minor Negative - RetuLrn uLnn1ecessary acccss roads to the previous state. access to wild lands Cooperate with local Departmiienit of Forest to regular control the use of access roads by local people in the remote or forested areas. - Train electrical technlicianis and local peoples about the way to handle wvith any bird net meet durinig ROW clearing.

19 IHJealtlh and safety Mitigable - Disseminate the information on electricity safety regulations to the users. - Follow the Govermilenit Decree 54 on network- protection. - Regular training for local technicianis and pcople on safety issues. - Not allow burinig the woody residues after ROW clearinlg. 20 Reduction of air pollutants Major positive - Not necessary to apply any mitigation measure _ generated by diesel generators 21 EMF No Impact - Not necessary to apply any mitigationi mcasure 22 Iimpacts o avia and airafts o Ipact - Not necessary to apply any mitigation mcasur-e

38 mm - - m - mm - mm m m m m - - - m

No Ilmtpact Evalirationi of Alitigation in easur es applied intpacts

23 Oil hazardous waste contaminiationi Minor Negative - Oil refilling of transformers should be done in the Workshop.

- No PCBs will be used. - Use oil collectors during maintenance services for unexpected oil spills.

39 m m m m - ~mmmmmmmminmmm

6.2. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING Table 6.2. Environmental monitoring plan

No Parameters How to monitor Frequency Responsible bodies CONSTRUCTION I Surface water turbidity 1) Visual observation to assess whether the excavation and other construction - Monthly - PMU (by the and soil erosion activities cause any pollution to the surface water, especially in term of during technical making water to be more turbid. construction supervisors of 2) The measures applied by Contractor to avoid the pollution of surface water period PMU) in term of turbidity. - Community's 3) Measurement should b e taken when there is some c omplaint from I ocal leaders will submit people report to the PMUs. 2 Noise level around 1) Assessment (by field observation) whether (i) the noise level is As above - SIMC (to be hired construction sites and unacceptable in the Project's residential areas (ii) The construction machines during construction adjacent residential areas annoy local people. phase, onetincthe J ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~phase,one in the 2) The mitigation measures applied by the Contractor to avoid the noise midle stage and at impact the and of the 3) The measurement should be taken when there is some complaint from local construction) people 3 Dust 1) Assessment (by visual observation) whether (i) the dust caused by As above construction is serious; (ii) the measures that Contractors are taken to control the dust level 2) The mitigation measures applied by the Contractor to avoid the dust level increasing in the area 3) The measurement should be taken when there is some complaint from local l______people l_ - m m - m - m m - m m m ------l

No Parameters How to monitor Frequency Responsible

4 Tree cutting and access 1) Assessmenit (by visual observation) wlhether (i) there is any excessix e clear As above roads maniagemiient and CLuttilng of trees beyond ROW in communal land control 2) Measures taken by Contractors for cleaningtup woody residue after tree cuttineL ._ _ _ 5 Solid waste and site Assessment by visual observation whether: As above As above cleaning up after the 1) Construction residues are clean up after the construction construction 2) The way that Contractor disposes the solid wastes from construction. 6 Workers' sanitation Assessment by visual observation: As above As above facilities and safety (1) Status of solid Nwaste and waste water disposal in camping sites management (2) Hygiene and safety issues in camping site (3) In case of borne stay, check the agreemient witlh communie's people committees.

7 Transportatioln Assessment by visual observation: As above As above disturbance (I) W'yhetler the construction and other project's activities suclh as pole's I erectioni, cable pulling cause any scrious distuLbance to tihe local traffic; (2) Necessary measturcs are taken to avoid the disturbaance of traffic such as: warning sign for construction work, avoiding of lheavy traffic hiours, (refer to _ Mitigation_M_ measures for details) _

8 Road degradation I Assessment by visual observation As above As above (1) The transportation of materials and equipment causes any damnage to the local road system and how is the lev of damage (2) 1lChe vehicles used for Project is overloaded that potentially cause the damua,e to the existing road syster'?

(3) The Contractor has taken any imieasuire to repair the roads that were ______I damagedd_duing: tiansportation of Proj kct's cqUIpIrICnIt artd m laterlal.

41 - - -- - m - m m m m m m m - - m m - -

No Parameters How to monitor Frequency Responsible bodies ______(4) There is aniy comiplainits from local peoples on the issuie 9 Status of application of Assessment of safety issue during construction: As above As above safety measures - Personal safety equipmcnt

- Technical and safety regulation to avoid the electricity shocks, electrical hazards etc. 10 Construction material Assessment by visual observation: As above As above management (1) The management of construction material in the warehouses

(2) The management of construction material in the construction site 11 Impact on wild life and Notice of Consultant on: As above As above natural resources (I) There is any evidence that the Project's activities cause any disturbance to the wild life and natural resource (bird, animal, snakes etc.), to the rare flora in the targeted communities. (2) Any huntinig, trapping or tree cutting by construction workers in Project area. OPERATION PHASE 12 Maintainin1g of ROW Assessmenlt by visual observation As above - Provincial Power ( I ) The tree cutting: wlether the riglht trees or right parts of tree are cut. Service (2) The proper mainitaininig oftdistance fromihouses to the ROW 13 Impact on wild life and Notice on1: As above - Provincial Power natural resource (1) I'lTere is any evidence that the Project cause any disturbanice to the wild Service life (bird, animal, snakes etc.) and natural resource (water, mangrove forest)

42 l l

| 6.3. CAPACITY BUIDING

The following training has been conducted to date: 1) May 2002: Training Workshop on preparation of EIA reports for power transmission and distribution projects 2) August 2003: Hands-on learning-by doing training for improving environmental reports. 3) September 2003: Hands-on workshop for environmental assessment of transmission and distribution projects. 4) Mav 2004: Training on preparation of EMP according to newly environmental templates developed by WB experts. 5) November 2004: Launch workshop for RE 2 projects. One important section of the workshop is implementation of EMP for Rural Energy projects.

Future training includes the following: 1) Annual training on implementation of EMP for RE and other power transmission and distribution projects. This training will be organised by EViN annually. 2) Workshop on sharing experience of EIA preparation and EMP implementation for power transmission and distribution projects. This training is planned to carry out at the end of 2005 and organised by EVN. 3) Training on implementation of EMP for power projects according to W1B requirement. The training will be organised by PCI 4) Regular training of PCI on safety issue for staff 5) Regular information dissemination for local people on electricity safety. l I l l l I l I 43 I1, ,, Table 6.3. The cost estimation for future trainings

No Training Cost (VND) 1 EVN annual Included in operation cost of EVN headquarter. PC1 training for all of will cover cost (hotel, travelling... ) for its staff for this I EVN's subsidiaries Project 6 staff from this Project will attend. 6 staff x 2 days x 4,000,000 VND/person = 48,000,000 VND

2 Workshop on Included in operation cost of EVN headquarter sharing experience 6 staff x 2 days x 4,000,000 VND/person = of EMP 48,000,000 VND implementation and EIA preparation 3 Training on EMP 12 staff from these 4 provinces will attend. implementation 12 x 2days x 400,000 VND/person/day/training = 9,600,000 VND 4 PC1 training on Included in operation cost of provincial power safety (regularly services. carried out by 30 staffs from this Project will attend I provincial power 30 persons x 1 day x 100,000 VND/day = 3,000,000 service) VND TOTAL 108,600,000 VND I I

I' I I' I' lI 44 I l l

U 6.4. ENVIRONMENT REPORTING REQUIREMENT

Table 6.4. Parties involving in environment monitoring No Parties Main responsibility Content and format for report 1 Construction Contractor - Apply proposed mitigation - Refer to Table 6.1 and 6.6 measures - Report to PMU the application of mitigation measures. 2 Technical supervisor of - Monitor (by observation) and - Refer to Table 6.1 and 6.7 PMU assess of the environmental parameters suggested by this IEE report; * ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-Report to PMU I 3 Safeguard Monitoring - Monitor (by observation) and Refer to Table 6.1 and 6.7 Independent Consultant assess environmental quality (SMIC) based on parameters I suggested by this IEE report. - Conduct public consultation to received comment, assessment of local people on environmental management of the___ Project. 4 Assigned staff from - Monitor (by observation) and - Refer to Table 6. 5 Project's commune assess of the environmental oetrameters suggested by this lEE report; - Report to PMU _ I I I I I I I

I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~45 _l I

Il

a Safeguard Independent Monitoring Consultant (SIMC) SIMC will be hired by the Project owners to monitor the implementation of the EMP. Duie to thle fact that R E projects are iusutally short so SIMC will carry ourt the wt'ork 2 tintces dulring conistrutctionz periodl. Onze time is aboutt 1 or 2 nmonths after startinig time azd the second time will be at the entd of the construietion work. For operation phase, the period of I year is adequate. The SIMC will report its environmental results everv six months during the constniction period. An example Terms of Reference for the SIMC during construction period is provided in the text box below.

| EXAMPLE ENVIRONMENTAL TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR SIMC 3 | The Safeguird Independent Monitoring Consultant will:

I. Visually look at the eonstrLICtion sites and make notes related to the following environmental issties. btit not limited to: . General clean up after construction wor].:s, . Excessive clear cuttin1g of trees beyond ROW in communal or forest land, * Measures taken by the contractor for cleaning tIp woody residues after tree cutting * Status of access roads (have thcy been closed if in a protected area, are they still being used and to what extent, how are they being contiolled/managed and by whom), Application of mitigation measures for or sign of soii erosion along T/L deic to tree eutting and/or arotind towcr fotindation . Status of rc-vegetation in the ROWs and tower foundation * Impacts on construction works (level of noise, dust, and damage to roads due to carthworks and transportation of building materials) . StattIs of construction worker camps and sanitation facilities for thcm . Proper distance between the houses and T/L, * Status of implementation of safety measures (signboards, restricted zonc, fences, isolation etc.)

2. Conduct public consultation to: . Assess the level of involvement by thie local authorities in dealing withi environmental issues (dust, noise, and damage to roads due to the transport of constrtuction materials, tree cutting on public lands and protected areas). . Identify any other environmental issues and record environmental complaints from the PAHs. . Report on responses (if any) from appropriate local authorities on environmental complaints or non- compliance

l I l l l

* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~46 11 I l

* Construction Contractor The construction contractor will submit to PCI monthly progress reports on the implementation of their site environmental management plan (SEMP). The SEMP report shall have the following contents:

EXAMPLE ANNOTATED OUTLINE FOR QUARTERLY SEMP REPORT

Title Page 3 Table of Contents Introduction 3 . 1 paragraph to introduce the purpose of the report

Update of Priority Issues Identified in the Last Reporting Period . List priority issues identified in last report * List progress made by Contractor in solving each issue • List any issues, whichi have not been adcquately resolved, and provide recommendations on how to resolve those issues. If they cannot be resolved. explain why.

Results of the Environmental Management Activities in this Reporting Period . Report on the mitigation measures that are identified in the SEMP. . Is each measure mceting its mitigation objective? If not, why not? Make sure explanation is clear and thorough.

Conclusions for this Reporting Period . List all priority issues identified during this reporting period . Provide advice as to how and when the Contractor will resolve each issue. If the Issue cannot be resolved, provide an explanation as to w'iy it cannot be resolved.

I Appendices . Completed sttrvey forms and maps relevant to the EMP. l Copies of any other commutticationis between PMU, Contractor, PCs, etc regarditig SEMP-related activities

I Communes o Each participating commune will submit monthly reports to PC 2 during construction phase. If deemed necessary by WB, EVN, or MoNRE, the I communes can also submit reports during pre-construction and operation periods. The commune-level reporting process necds to be simple, consistent between communes, and accountable. I I l I 1 47 I I =

Table 6.5. An example data collection form for commune's representatives

EXAMPLE COMMUNE-LEVEL DATA REPORT FORMAT

Project's Commune Thuong Tan - Bac Me - Ha Giang province

| Reporting Period April 2006 Environmental Impacts:

Impact I Mitigation Measure Commune Representative Community Comments Comments Project vehicles or activities increase( No comment No comment ambient (tist levels Pro ject vehicles or activities increased Some noise near hospital, but Hospital staff complained ambient noise levels no noise other sensitive about construction noise to areas (schools, pagodas, etc). Peoples' Comm;ttee and ______~Dept. of Health. Project activities polluted local rivers No comment No comments _or lakes Project cleared vegetation and this No comment No comment caused environmental impacts _ __ Project activities created impacts on Visited location where Some farmers complained agricultural and/or residential land farmers complained and saw that piles of dirt are being ______piles of dirt on their land left on their paddy fields. Project activities impactedl cultural No comment No comment _ ~~~~~~~~property Project construction caused traffic No comment No comment impacts l Project caiise(l solid waste or liquid( Noticed garbage was left No comment wvaste impacts around construction comp Project caused Social and healthi No comment Shopkeepers are happy to impacts of workers receive business from construction workers Accidents Two local workers were No comment injured when some equipment * fell on them during excavation activity. | Dust suppression measures No comment No comment Erosion and se(liment controls No comment No comment I Sitting of materials etc. to avoid No comment No comment exacerbation of flood effects, chemical pollution etc. Waste management practices No comment No comment Project activities causiel any impact Some birds nets has been No comment on hsirds, aiimalis alnd rare flora destroyed during cable *______pulling _ __- Project vehicles da:niagel thc roads Yes, 1 km pf inter commune's The vehicles were too road was heavily damaged. heavy. Need to change to Need to be recovered before smaller vehicles with fewer l______- rainy season loads. Other No comment No comment Recommen lations . Futuire construction near hospital should be limited to 07:00 to 11:00 and 14:00-17:00. During the timc 1 1:00 to 14:00 is when hospital staff and patients resting, so thcy need quiet during this time. * More care should be taken to clean up constrtmction camps * Contractor should make stire to keep piles of dirt in designated working areas

* 48 I_ l I

| . More safety equipment and training programs should be given to construction workers to reduce accidents.. especially for the local workers because they don't know muchi about worker safety

Signature of Commune Representative: sNguyeni Van,

Title of Commune Representative: Vicc-Cflainnan, Peopfes' Committee

Date: April 30, 2004

I l I l I l I I l l

I 49 1 - -- - m m m - m m m - m m - - m - - - m

Table 6.6. Example of Site Environmental Management Monitoring Report (Applied for Contractor's Report)

Project name: Project location: Name of Contractor: Commencement of Project report or monthly report: Date of report:

No Impact Mitigation measures implemented Comment Construction phase 1 Surface water contamination 2 Noise and vibration 3 Soil erosion__ 4 Air pollution_ 5 r sl-. llil 11production due to temporary acquisition of

6 Traffic disturbance_ 7 Damaging the existing road system _ 8 Solid waste generated from soil excavation _ _- 9 Manaqement of redundant soil 10 Environmental impacts caused b~onstruction worker 11 Conf!ict between construction worker and local people 12 Health and Safety l Name of person prep-tred this Report: Title: Address: Telephone:

50 m - m - m m m m m m - m - - m - - m -

Table 6.7. An Example of Environmental Performance Monitoring Report (This Example can be used for environmental monitoring report of Technical supervisor consultant, SMIC) Project name: Project location: Province: District: Type of Report: Commune: fVionthly report (Yes/No): Quarterly Report to EVN (Yes/No): Quarterly Report to the WB (Yes/No): Date of report: SMIC report (Yes/No):

No Parameter Assessment of Consultant! community Comments/Recommendations During Construction complaints 1 Surface water turbidity and soil erosion __l 2 Noise level around construction sites and adjacent residential areas 3 Dust 4 Tree cutting and access roads management and control 5 Solid waste and site cleaning up after the construction 6 Workers' sanitation facilities and safety management 7 Transportation disturbance __.__ ___ 8 Road de g _-_

10 Construction material management __ 11 Management of redundant soil 12 Jmat o il ie n ntrl eorces_ 13 Evidence of biodiversity loSS (if there is any 14 Evidence of loss of historical and cultural propeties ______15 Other environment related issue (if there is any) __ _ __

51 m------m --- n n -

No Parameter Assessment of Consultant! community Comments/Recommendations complaints During operation 16 Maintaining of ROW 17 Impact on wild life and natural resource

Report prepared by: Position:

52 - -- - mmmmm-- -mmmmmmi -- nm

Table 6.8. The environmental reporting requirement

level~~~~ drd TT Issutes to be reported reportig 21 reportig,level 3 reportinig level (a copy shouild he senit to DoNRE) Construction phase _ I Implementation of By: the Contractor By: PMU By: EVN mitigation measures Frequency: Monthly Frequency: Quarterly Frequency: Quarterly and site environmiiienctal To: PMU To: Project owner To: The WB management * EVN 2 Environmental By: By: The related PMU By: EVN monitoring * Technical supervisors of the PMU Frequency: Quarterly Frequency: Quaiterly Frequency: Monthly To: Project Owners To: The WB To: PMU By: * Commune's People Committee Frequency: Monthly To: PMU By: * SIMC Frequency: Half-yearly To: WB Operation phase I Environmiiiental By: By: PCs (PC1) By: EVN monitoring including * Techlniciani of Provinlcial Power Frequeicy: Yearly Frequency: Yearly safety issues Service To: EVN To: The WB Frequency: Half-yearly To: Regional PCs (PC I)

53 l

6.5. COST ESTIMATION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF EMP Table 6.9: Estiniated costs for implementation of the EMP (VND)

-| [ Nol Item Construictioni Operation (20 years of I______life cycle) 1 Mitigation measures The costs are covered in Contract The cost is covered in _ _ :with Construction Contractors production cost of the provincial power service

2 Monitol-i lg costs 3 mani-milonithi x 10,000,000 = 1 man-monith/year x I 30,000,000 10,000,000 x 20 years = 200,000,000

3 Capacity building 108,600,000

TOTAL 138,600,000 200,000,000 This cost is covered in production cost of the provincial power service

GRAND TOTAL 338,600,000 VND FOR NVHOLE .| | PROJECT

I I I

I I

I 54 l I I

6.6. ARRANGEMENT FOR EMP'S IMPLEMENTATION Table 6.10. Arrangement for EMP's implementation

ROLE RESPONSIBILITIES ORGANIZATION

Project Owner . Ultimately responsible for overall project Power Company 1 management, including environmental (PC 1) l ~~~~~~~~management.

Overall Project . Responsible for coordination and Rural Energy Management management of overall project Project's Agency implementation, including guiding and Management Board supervising implementation of the EMP. (PC1)

l Environmental . Specific responsibility and point of contact for Environment Officer environmental issues. management division of Rural Energy Project's Management Board (PC1)

Project . Responsible for day-to-day project Done by Power Implementation implementation. Activities include: Network Project Agency i. Planning and implementation of Management Board environmental management activities (PC1) during construction * ii. Coordinating with other parties inr relation to environmental management activities. I iii. Carrying out internal monitoring and supervising independent monitoring iv. Supervising and providing budget for I monitoring activities. v. Reporting on environmental l _ _ _ information to concerned parties

Project Operator . Responsible for operation of the project Provincial Power including operation stage environmental Service management and monitoring activities.

Consultant . Responsible for preparation of EMP Power Consulting documentation. Center - PC1

Contractor . Responsible for supervision of civil works Rural Energy l Supervision contractors during construction, including Project's implementation of environmental Management Board management activities under the EMP (PC1)

55 l I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ROLE RESPONSIBILITIES ORGANIZATION

Civil Works . Responsible for construction works and Contractorl Contractor following contractor specifications outlined in the EMP. This includes: i. Applying construction-phase I mitigation measures. ii. Ensuring safety of construction workers and local people during construction. iii. Following Vietnam and World Bank policies on environmental protection during construction.

Safeguard . Responsible for independent monitoring of SIMC Independent Monitor EMP implementation (SIMC)

Community . Involve in project's environmental monitoring Commune's involvement in EMP and management representatives

Provincial . Supervision on EMP implementation Environmental environmental according to Environmental Permit Management Division supervision of DONRE I .II I l I I I I l

* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~56 l l

I REFERENCES

|1 Draft of Resettlement Action Plan of the Project - PC I

2 Environmental Status Report of Lai Chau, Lao Cai and Ha Giang province in 2003 - DoNRE

I 3 World Bank Environmental Assessment Source Book

| 4 Statistical Yearbook 2002 - Statistical Publisher

5 Sourcebook of Protected Areas in Viet Nam - Bird Life International

16 Project's feasibility study - PCI

7 Vietnam living standards survey, Statistical Publishing House, 2000.

8 Framework for Applying Environment Safeguards to Rural Energy II Project- WB 2003. l I I I l I l

* 57 l APPENDIX 1

LIST OF EA PREPARERS l 1 Nguyen Van Dong Science, Technology Service Enterprise Power Engineering and Consulting Company N°1 2 Nguyen Anh Tuan Science, Technology Service Enterprise I Power Engineering and Consulting Company N°l 3 Nguyen Thi Khieu Science, Technology Service Enterprise Power Engineering and Consulting Company N°1

4 Mai Xuan Thanh Science, Technology Service Enterprise I Power Engineering and Consulting Company N°1 5 Nguyen Huu Ba Science, Technology Service Enterprise Power Engineering and Consulting Company N°1 6 Nguyen Nam Trung Science, Technology Service Enterprise Power Engineering and Consulting Company N°1

7 Le Duc Thien Science, Technology Service Enterprise Power Engineering and Consulting Company N°1 8 Tran Quang Thach Science, Technology Service Enterprise Power Engineering and Consulting Company No1 I 9 Le Thi Van Anh Independent Environmental Consultant I I I I I I S

,,1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~5 I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I I APPENDIX 2 I I PROJECT'S ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT I I I I I I II I I l I I I I I I

I 59 I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

SJ: / 1/~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Utu.~~~~~~~~~~~,,(;py 21'r 3 i a,,dzn 2 00

B N ND D)A 11hl.X'[ T1 Aii (Ii.U.'N'()CjUAI T`I N('l )-T C(.l 1. ;d ii-J i ;i i I ig i ('"( iUw 1 .(In viclC '.' - Mm vi\'LIc p1 i:1 11js8 (;)(,1 3 - (iai (1081 1)

'l-C '(li1 c lj 'I'I', hr -i )/I I'1- 1 CNJ H"IOt 2C9//'I/I 1) I(. I ' I' ,II-'I()I .1'CN A22,j1 \ /vS I-!L!()!1 JC!1 1;-!1' 'A.1 [!"1:t'1 dlnh ilioH c'lo D)i n 1 :1 1Hic nm.'I r'Lr(YH,"

t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 i (il j \' (l )' 0 t dml t L I I; I II I I I I I 'm

7 iri _l Ino 1 ,1- 0thOuV ic:t KIILL wV'C' I)e1 IKiC (11 .3 - rI i do i II) 'i4HBuI Q i II dir |(-6ll iii 112- C(o,01 [N di(1 1 I li N.il [' l ( t11Tu110 '1ict r H,C - I)(;jI -2 U~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~d);iH I wH,8v 2PS h)!I, I nCi i 2(, [S

'I (Jt i il;mli 1 II 1'l II I li'

| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~c, f 3'm'. 3 di .,,2 1-,1' cl; \ { ILIiF 2' ' 4tl lJ 1) "t C6: '. DU E"Is-> 'I U S fOAl~~~~~~~~~~~~'IiII cli [0 C& C I, i I GILII'. ' ". T11'.HJ 'Iul. nJrHl O

ii2. C'L'I I-1 'mHi (') tiJGIc hCndtmjJliCH.tnr 1IhF1W 101Cdt11!u diii C "18:I

Nii i4.; i.)i ;iii lo;I;- thInv lI(i :\HC) n [ c vii ii Hht Nc )11(1 i1) ;1 il(),I (oii d;i I)t1 i I l 'C.'O;;!] .K1 CUl'l)i1'lCII . N CII in 0; (lcli' ( );-'I Ci C Coll 2

C'ik'l 11. C;lim l,)h ;;11 C0(;;CIu]i 11 102[1J. N Ii 11 02. \'C I (1 ' NV11(^) iI.I'11 2 (; 1(1: 1 [iJi.

I _ _ _~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 1c

I I-:-' -N i IJ I I_

I J ( 1 1 ! I L, i I _1,' !:,!' i\' '!II Ll'c1 1I:i ( I,i.!ll"h !) ' iC ,

| ~~~~~-' 1 , ) I i! -1il(.i1' i'l)'- :| -I l11irri .i ' ';fQ3 6 TjiE . I I, C:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~7NI 7; I-&

NY)A"' | | ';~~~~~~~31-'E4T, N A C,

.>t ,0 I>> * * t3-3t~D. K," ts- AT T ftv "Tvu - 3J 3-'lig 0aL | ( ri~~~~~~~ac:tt ain- N;;-ng lu'ono 1ibno the)n Vsi4t isal

I T (7 J.-i VIi D "O(C s 3aAi > lu 7FN1,-" v _N 04 TR N, -- _T;tATk. L CHi@U |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~xc,NNAt 'tI A N'

LI- , si ;>x - p?ell 1 }nj ,1 <,1,~~~~~~~~~~~-PA;'u z-Fn >wBn4>) D; z, '_ Vi. Ah;-:5. r >v~k:IC' .At^;', '^ .\i

j ,, _,C) . T1Si< d ! '.-~' '

QAl a_ Ci I _1cBi r7n,r^:rk't3s _R T~ .r.16

M'1, 'i!-t Ift?Az' MO f; eSirn w^ Die'li 4: Sa-Ll iti I\ts .!'L. "' >f__l

IEI I%"\ui"> g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~k-'' '' ,A.! -a-l a .

.' ',._w ;,f , i_, i,,, ' .I ' 1i i ;X,'L; '.'. ' | TL : I' _...... /? | ~tybaai nhan dan tinh Lo Cai CONG HO) XS.HOI CHU iNGHIA VE;T NAM SO TAI NGUYEN VA MOI TRUONG M c Ilp - Th do - Hanh phec

I SdO: 35 /TNMTg LGo Cal, ngMs thanGg 03 ndim 2005

PHIEU XAC NHAN BAN D)ANG KY DAT TEU CHUAN MIOI TRUONG LDuan: Nang lro'ng nong thon Viet Nam - Khu vuc phia Bac (dot 3 - giai doan 1) Ban Quan 1y du. an luc,i dien - Cong ty Di)n luc 1

GIAM DOC SO TAI 'N1GUYkEN VA MOI TRUONG LAO CAI XAC NHAN

| .r> )ie'u 1: DaT Ntdng lNoglg n6ng thJn Vi6,t Nain - Khiu vu'c pltifa Bac (do't 3 - giai doanz 1) dzr kie7t ca[p dien cho 24 xd tinh Lao Cai do Cdng ty Diehi lu'c i lami |chu duii an dO trinh noi dung Ban clang ky dat tieu chuan moi tmu'6ng ngay 20/03/2005. Die'u 2: Ch'u dui an c6 trach nhiem thu,c hien nghiern tuc nhung cam ket trone bin dang ky dat tieu chuan moi truong, dong thoi phai thuc hien t't yeu cau sau day; - ]'hi trien khai dui dn chu 5,.chat phd cay doc duong day phai thuc hien theo 3 cing Naighi dinh so: 54/1999/ND-CP cua Chifnh prhu v6 b io v2 11Tnh lang hi'6i di6n cao ap. - 'Frong qua trinh thi cng xay duing ceng trinh, nguyen vat lieu phai duoc tap k6t, bao quan va suir dung dung mu.c dich; dong thoi phai thu aom cac loai chat !hii *va xi l-v khong lam anh huong dcO'n canh quan moi truong. - Thuc hien nghiem tuc cc bien phaip gioam thieu 0 nhi^em mibi truo6ng trong giai ceoan thiet ke, thi cong va giai doan qu'an 1' van hanh Iuoi diTn theo quv dinlh. Di'u 3: BAn dang ky dat tieu chuin moi trudngce a du an va nhunc vyu cau tai

Iv'_.L ' ntan bAn nay 1l ca' s dclecc quan quan 15 Nha nuoc ve b'ao ve moi truo(ng kiem tra viec thuc hien cdc quy dinh ve bao ve moi tirung. Dieti 4: Sau khi cong trinh di vao hoat dcng, Chu dur an phil thu'c hiOn bAio co |gidm sait dinh ky (1 lan/ nam) ve moi trLndng theo quy dinh. Bao cdo duec gui d 'n So& Tai ngutyen va Moi truong de quan 1y./. I Noi nhan: K/T GIAM DOC - Ban QLDA Iu'6i dien (T/h) SO TAI NGUYEN VA MOI TRUONG LAO CAT - B6 pha n I cura S o - Thanh tra S,

- Ltru VT-MTg / -,

I I I.

UBITD TINH DImN BIENT CONG HOA XA HOI CHU NGHIA VIET NAM SO TAI NGUYEN VA MOI TRIdNG D6c lap - Th do - Hanh phiic |~~~~6. So../ TNIMTI 2N- MTEg Dien Biedn, Ngdy.e>1..thjI2g 4 ni7dn 2005 I PHIEU XAC NHAN BAN DANG KY DAT TIEU CHUAN MOI TRUONG Ciua Df an: Nang Ilropn n6ng th6n Viet Nam - Dot 3 - Giai doan 1 3 Tinh DEin Bien.

I GIAM DOC SO TAI NGUYEN VA MOI TRJ'ONG TINH DIEN BIEN

X ~~~~~~~~XA,CNHAN

Dieu 1. Dir,an Nang luo, ngng thon Viet Nam - Dot 3 - Giai doan 1- Tinh | Dien Bien da trinh noi dung B5an dang kc d,at tieu chuan moi trutng, ngay 21 thang 3 narn 2005. Dieu 2. Chui dir an c6 trach nhiem th,rc hien dung nhung n6i dung da. duoc neu trong Ban dang ky dat tieu chuan moi truong. Di u 3. Ban dang ky dat tieu chuan m6i trxrdng cua Du an la co s& de cac U cic quan quAn 1)T Nha nu6'c ve bao ve moi trtu6ng kiem tra viec thu'c hien bao ve m6i trurdng cua Dui an. Dieu 4. Sau khi hoan thanh cac hang muc c6ng trinh ve moi trtrdng, Ch'u dur an phai co bao cao bang van ban gui cci quan nha ntroc ve moi trurog de kiem tra.

Noi nhdn: - BQL DA lt(&i dien SO TAI NGUYEN VA MOI TRUdNG

|) Cd2ng ty dben lac . . - - UBND tu'nh (B/C). -Limn 'T - MT. J I.

-' '-C ; . -,f

l~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~' I I I I APPENDIX 3

I RECORDS OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I 3 60 I CONG HOA XA lOI CHTU hNGHIA VIET NAM DOc lap- Tir do - Hanh phuc

BIEN BAN THAM VAN CONG D ONG BAO CAO D.ANH GIA TAC DONG MOI TRU6NG

Si Ma Cai, ngay.. . .thdng...... nam 2004 Thanh phan tham dir: 1. Dai di,n UBND xa Can Ho: bOng: Ly Seo Din - Ch'u tich UBND xa. 2. Nhi ng ngardi bi anh hu&ng b&i du an: khbng c6. 3. ai die,n ban QLDA, Trung tam tu van va xay dtmng dien luc I. Cac a'n d e tharn va^n: 1. Tham va'n ve chon tuy-en, dia diem tram: phu hcrp v6i quy hoach tru6'c mat | va lau dai, giam chi phi dtu an, khong anh hu&ng den moi truong sinh thai. 2. Cac anh huung c-ua du an doi voi khu vu.c va cac ke' hoach quan Iy m.ci truobng: anh huofng khong adng ke de'n khu vLrc moi truong xung quanh. 3. Y kie'n c'ua dia phuong ve cdanh giA tac dbcng moi truirng va quan 1 g'iarn sat: - Vi tri tram: phu hop v6i quy hoach. - Cac bien phap giarm thi.Lu: xay dung dcnng vi tri thiet ke', dam bao v6i quy hoach. - Cac van de ton tai: khong co.

Xac nhan cua dai dien chiu dau tiu XAc nhan cu'a-chinh quyen dia phiruon-

Xac nhan cua dai dien hoi phu nui Xac nihan cua dai dien hoi phu lao

* tt / , '< }/

| XAc nhin c6a dai dien hoi nong dAn §t Ž

I > i

CONG HOA XA HOI CHU NGHIA VIET NAM Doc lap - Tt do - Hanh phu'c

BIEN BAN THAM VAN CONG DONG vfE KE HOACH DEN BU VA TAI DINWCIY

Si Ma Cai, ngay... dO1...thang..4/.... nam 2004

Thanh ph-in tham dir: 1. Dai dien UBND xa CAn Ho: Ong: Ly Seo Din. Chuc vu: Ch'u tich UBND xa. 2. Nhu'ng nguoi bi anh hu'ong b&i du an: 20 ho. Nam: 11, nur: 09. 3. Dai dien Trung tam ttu vatn va xay durng dien lu I: Ong: To Hien Son. Chu'c vu: Ph6 giAm d6c. CAc va'n de' tham van: | 1. Pho bi6n cAc chfnh sach lien quan den den bu tai clinh cu: - Nhung khu v-uc trurng dung drt cho du an. I - Dix kie'n thoi gian tie'n hanh cho du' An. - Pho bie'n cAc chInh sach cua Vi&t Nam va WB. I - Cac quy dinh phAp luat Viet Nam va chfnh sach WB c6 lien quan. - Cac chInh sach dcen bu cho du' an. - Cac khu tai dinh cu' (ne'u c6). 2. Y kien cua dia phuong ve ke' hoach den bu va tai dinh cu' - K/hd naing xay 7a nhhi?g adnh hi(O`ng bat Ioi cdia di,' d: + D6oi 6i nha cuLa: Toan bo tuyen duo6ng day trung the, ha the` v cac tram bic'n ap cua dui an khong x'iy ra nhung anh huong gi dcoi v6i nha cura cua nhcin d;an cFung nhu' nha c'ua cua Nha nun6c. + Do'i v6i dcUt dai: Tocin bo dcUt dai nam trong pham vi dui An kh6ng cnh hhLrOM- | gi v'e qui hoach, k6e'hoach c-^ip dclt ciua dia phuong. + Doi v6i cay co'i: Khu vuc du An xay dung khong Anh hwo'ng cle'n cAc khLU I vuc vNuon ca'm Quo'c gia, hay rurng dac dung cua dia phuong. + D6i v-6i moi tructng tu nhien, xa hoi: Moi truodng tu nhien, xc hoi cua khu * vuc dui an khong anh hunong gi do viec xAy durng dii An. I - Cac bien php ,giadn hiehi,: + Trong giai doan thiet ke': Chab hanh cac qui trinh de qui pham cua nganh aier, ra va cac cam ke't da duc5c thoa thuan v6'i dia plhuong. + Trong giai doan thi cong: Thi cong theo ban ve d5 cluoc phe duvet, kh6n, lam anh huLrong de'n nhung pharn vi ngoai du an. + Trong giai doan van hanh: Tuan thu qui trinh qui pham nganh dien, bao ve khu vao hanh lang tuye'n, kh6ng xam pham ngoai pham vi hanh lang tuye'n. - Cdc phazong 7n dGe bi'i, quy trinh clii twd dane bzu: + Gid den bu, hinh thulc den bu: Tien mat theo quy dinh hihn hanh. + Thbi gian thu'c hien chi tra clen bu: Theo quy dinh hien hanh. + Quy ch'e'khieu nai giam sat: Theo quy dinh hien hanh. I

Xac nhan cua dai dien chu dau tur X7ac nhatn cua do'n vi tir v'arn :<~uc,TAM K/T'GIA M DOC | TU VA;N X,AY DUNG :'N' LUC / < ~~~~~ :; ; r

X;dc nhan-cua cninsh quyen dia phurong Xac nhan c'ua ngtu6i bi a'nh htr6iang

I... C

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~/. I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I I APPENDIX 4

I MAP OF PROJECT AREAS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 61

I m mm-m m m m m m m m m m m m m mm

Existing and proposed protected areas in Ha Giang province Cac khu blo ve hien c6 va de xuit 8 tinh Ha Giang

f fJE6ngVAn BatQO -

n~~~~~~Y~ AAnh

-hr~gu~ -b - jr 8

RiongWQl>

Tay C':Lo ii TX. H_i dM

S~~~~~~~~~~~~ y C-w=ob' uni jLp ,, ML.

If if--- R V.,

L ; - NHrH2ng | >~~~~~~ .1,i§n BQgSu Ph~

! k5° YBn ,;g .u2nAP fI / _ -~~~~~~~~~~~~~***IL~T1f_ iliag ,mp.aBs B

BsoY- _T__- T^m

Vegatation type I Kieu rfng Lgend I C:h giti * Eve4rgreen foresl f RLing lhudng Kanh Prrlecled arraa b oav JKhu * Co nifero us foresl f Risng la kim -Prori ncial border f Ran h gidi 1in h EOciduous foresi (Ring rung la (kh6pi - - -~ Eicl border f FRanh gidi huyn * Seomi-dciduous foresl I Ring n:ta rung; la * Limes14ne foresl f Rng nui Bamboo I Ritng Ire ntta * Planla1ion foresi Ring lr6ng a Grassland and scrub I Eai Irongi N Agnicullural1 land I £1 nong nghiop Waler bodies I hMl nUdcN Mn * Mangrmve uRing ngup m n r M Lmelioeuca f Reing Iram 8 | Existing and proposed protected areas in Lao Cai province Cac kh u bto ve hien co va de xugft ltinh Lbo Cai

A~~~~~~ r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~l -- j?,

| ^§ 8 ,f X {hed~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~ng,RWg-7 _PI%\~ Than San CnHo H ng u

|Ca|o, * 9 i HoVang Su _ 7 ||-*T ,Na K9 _w

Phong Th -P TX- Uo 22'i

_ 1~~~~~~~.T. im'DLh

Ho Len Son-Lai Cha RQ J en

Rdf LiTe"n Son-Sa - -

9-L * 4 r

4 TX.e_ U n -y - jib~~~~~~~~~i

~~~j ~~~~Vin Yi~n

2 ~ 4 tto Qu0n1(thpj NhflinTh2 nha KkLn __n Mi Lgx.EpChiri

TX. Nghb L6 V*agetation type) Ki&u rng Legend I Chu gir"I Evergreen foreE I Rifng IhLfdng Kanh Prolecied area (Kh u bf o v UCo nifero us fbresi I FRing lik kim Provi ncial border I Rs n h g0id1i nh Decid uo us foresi I Ritng ru ng Ia (k h6p) - - -- EUs1ti border I Ra nh gk0i h uy6 n Semi-decid uo uE forel I Fnt ng nita ru ng lI *rnLimlone foresi I Rifng nuidc Bamboo I Rifng ire nCra *Planiaiion foresi I FRing iro-ng GrasEla nd and scrub /£I01iro"ngN Agnc ullural la nd I E£6i n6 ng ng hi&'p Waler bodies I MEI nu dc W B * MKngrove I Fing nghp man Melaleuca I Ring iram S Protected areas maps

[Maps index I Key in seParate frame]

Click on the protected areas to view the site cards in pdf format.

Existing and proposed protected areas in Lai Chau province Cac khu b6io v-e hien co va de xuat 8 t6nh Lai ChAu

' am Si Tgm

8 Edng Lay wIILX S TB ~~~~ayEsilbaf lY tw hw>nsT6¢8 t^-~~aHIoangLilen So-Cheu ~- SPa{

9~~~~~~~~~UHornghlhen .Son st-S.P

B s -0-;X.

t f ] XT tt a ^ 8~h.U Hoang Lien Son-Vn ar

*D+§njF~~~h * i ¢ \

Nam~ ~ ~ ~ lh E~ IT# 4tro: a

lk Ong&Thuan OhSu hluo! ggang t3

s Ph~ ~~ ast\d<- So t

M3ng it. STng

Vegetation typH Kigs o lng Legend t C:hu giaI bao ve * Evergreen foresi f Ring 1hLrdng xanh[ Maps| Keein index senThuAn frameA Prolecled area (Kshu gidi lmnh * Coniferous foresi I RLing la kim ProvinGial border f Ranh - I Ranh gidi huywn Deciduous forest f Ring rung la (khop) -- OCsinci border i~ ~~ ~ *~ Semi-deciduous~ ~ ~ forest~~~~~MU f RMng ntSa rung la n U Limeslone forest f IRing nui da Bamboo J RiLung NrenNa * Plantation forest f Ring HALng N Grassland and scrub fA h Trong Agricultural land f £aT nong nghiLp S W l Waler bodies f MSi nLtdc MSlangrove f IRirng ng3p mbn L * S M hlelaleuca f Rinng tram [Mans index I Key in separate frame]