Technical Report Livelihood Need Assessment in Quang Nam and Thua Thien Hue Province
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
TECHNICAL REPORT LIVELIHOOD NEED ASSESSMENT IN QUANG NAM AND THUA THIEN HUE PROVINCE Submitted by Centre for Rural Development in Central Vietnam (CRD) HUE, AUGUST 30th 2017 This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of ECODIT and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We sincerely thank the different individuals and organizations for their kind support and help, without whom this study and report would not be possible to produce. We are grateful to the United State Agency for International Development (USAID) for funding this livelihood survey and assessment through its Green Annamites Project in Central Viet Nam, in particular to Chief of Party of the project, Dr. Stacy Crevello, for approving our project proposal, Dr. Daniel Lopez, Mr. Pham Thanh Nam and Mr. Ong Dinh Bao Tri for giving valuable comments and providing useful information. Our gratitude is also due to the officials of the Provincial People’s Committee (PPC) and staff of the provincial Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (DARD) and Department of Natural Resources and Environment (DONRE) of Quang Nam and Thua Thien Hue provinces for their warm welcome, suggestions and for the support for our activities during the preparation and implementation of field activities. We also thank the officials and staff of the Forest Management Boards (FMB) of Phong Dien Nature Reserve, Sao La Nature Reserve, Back Ma National Park, Song Thanh Nature Reserve, Ngoc Linh Nature Reserve and Elephant Nature Reserve for their support especially during the household survey and interviews carried out in different communes of the reserves, as well as for their constructive comments and suggestions during the workshops in Quang Nam and Thua Thien Hue province. Our sincere gratitude goes to the commune and village leaders with whom we got useful information for the livelihood assessment, as well as general information about their communes/villages. Last but not least, we thank the farmers with whom we had interviews, particularly for their candid responses to our questions and offering ideas and suggestions concerning their livelihoods. ASSESSMENT TEAM Centre for Rural Development in Central Viet Nam (CRD) Dr. Truong Quang Hoang Prof. Dr. Le Duc Ngoan Assoc Prof. Dr. Le Thi Hoa Sen Hoang Thanh Hung, MSc Mr. Vo Chi Tien Nguyen Thanh Hien, MSc. Nguyen Truong Thi, MSc. Assoc Prof. Dr. Nguyen Van Loi Centre for Sustainable Rural Development (SRD) Ms. Tran Thi Thanh Toan Ms. Nguyen Thi Hoa CONTRIBUTING PARTNER World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Dr. Delia C. Catacutan Mr. Do Trong Hoan Dr. Rachmat Mulia TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgement ...................................................................................................................................................... ii List of figures .............................................................................................................................................................. vii List of tables .............................................................................................................................................................. viii List of acronyms .......................................................................................................................................................... x Executive summary..................................................................................................................................................... 1 I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1. OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2. SCOPE OF THE ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................... 7 II. AIMs AND OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................................. 8 III. METHODOLOGY AND PROCESS of the HOUSEHOLD SURVEY ................................................ 8 3.1. ASSESSMENT DESIGN.................................................................................................................................. 8 3.1.1. Conceptual framework ............................................................................................................................... 8 3.1.2. Assessment questions ................................................................................................................................. 9 3.1.3. Technical approaches ................................................................................................................................ 10 3.2. DATA COLLECTION METHODS .......................................................................................................... 11 3.2.1. Desk review ................................................................................................................................................ 11 3.2.2. Secondary data collection ........................................................................................................................ 11 3.2.3. Socio-economic household survey ........................................................................................................ 11 3.3. DATA PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 14 3.3.1. Data entry, processing and analysis ....................................................................................................... 14 3.3.2. Data quality assurance .............................................................................................................................. 14 3.4. ASSESSMENT IMPLEMENTATION ......................................................................................................... 15 IV. METHODOLOGY AND PROCESS FOR LIVELIHOOD ASSESSMENT ........................................ 15 4.1. METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................ 15 4.2. DESK REVIEW AND SECONDARY DATA COLLECTION ............................................................ 16 4.3. SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE ...................................................................................................................... 16 4.4. FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION (FGD) ................................................................................................... 16 4.5. KEY INFORMANT INTERVIEWS (KIIS) ................................................................................................ 17 4.6. WEIGHTED MATRIX SCORING AND RANKING ........................................................................... 18 4.7. MARKET VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................... 19 V. MAIN FINDINGS FROM the HOUSEHOLD SURVEY ....................................................................... 20 5.1. SAO LA NATURAL RESERVE ................................................................................................................... 20 5.1.1. Overview of TTH SLNR .......................................................................................................................... 20 5.1.2. Overview of QN SLNR ............................................................................................................................ 21 5.1.3. Main findings from the household survey ............................................................................................ 22 5.1.4. Conclusion of household conditions in SLNR .................................................................................... 32 5.2. BACH MA NATIONAL PARK .................................................................................................................. 33 5.2.1. Overview of BMNP ................................................................................................................................... 33 5.2.2. Main findings from the HH survey ......................................................................................................... 34 5.2.3. Conclusion of household conditions in BMNP ................................................................................... 43 5.3. PHONG DIEN NATIONAL RESERVE.................................................................................................... 43 5.3.1. Overview of PDNR ................................................................................................................................... 43 5.3.2. Main findings from the household survey ............................................................................................ 44 5.3.3. Conclusion of HH conditions in PDNR ............................................................................................... 53 5.4. SONG THANH NATIONAL RESERVE ................................................................................................. 54 5.4.1. Overview of STNR ...................................................................................................................................