4.2.1.1. Knowledge of Contraceptive Methods 42 4.2.1.2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

4.2.1.1. Knowledge of Contraceptive Methods 42 4.2.1.2 I Lists of tables III Lists of Figures V ACRONYMS VI Acknowledgment VII Evaluators VIII Executive summary IX I. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Background 1 1.2. Context of RH/FP in Oromia Region 4 1.3. Program Description 6 1.3.1. Objective of the Project 6 1. General Objective: 6 2. Specific Objectives of ODA program: 6 1.3.2. Program Components 7 1.4. Justification of the Evaluation 9 1.5. Stakeholder Analysis 9 II. OBJECTIVE OF THE EVALUATION 11 2.1 General Objective 11 2.2. Specific objectives of the evaluation 11 2.3 Evaluation Questions 11 III. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY 15 3.1. Study area and Period 15 3.2 Evaluation Design and Data collection Methods 15 3.3. Sample size and sampling technique 16 3.4. Data management and analysis Limitations of the study 18 3.5. Ethical considerations 19 IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 21 4.1. Degree of Program Implementation 21 4.1.2. Level of stakeholders’ involvement 22 4.1.4. Supervisory Support 24 4.1.5. Capacity Building Activities 24 4.1.6. Role of CBRHAs and their acceptance by the community 26 4.1.7. Information, Education, and Communication (IEC) 29 Evaluation of Reproductive Health/Family Planning Project Of Oromia Development Association (ODA) II 4.1.7.2. Provisions of Information and Education 30 4.1.7.3. Exposure to Family Planning messages 31 4.1.7.4. Organize/Supporting in and out-of-school youth clubs 32 4.1.8. Provisions of Contraceptives 33 4.1.8.1. Amount of contraceptive methods and Couple-year protection (CYP) generated 33 4.1.8.2. New contraceptive users 34 4.1.8.3. Contraceptive Acceptance Rate: 36 4.1.8.4. Perceived Quality of services and Client Satisfaction 37 4.1.8.5. Informed choice 40 4.2. Outcome of the project 40 4.2. 2. Family Planning 42 4.2.1.1. Knowledge of contraceptive methods 42 4.2.1.2. Use of contraceptive methods 44 4.2. 2. Age at first marriage 51 4.2.3. Utilization of Maternal Health services 51 4.2.3.1. Antenatal care 52 4.2.3.2. Delivery care 54 4.2.3.3. Postnatal Care (PNC) 56 V. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 63 5.1. Conclusion 63 5.2. Recommendation 65 VI. REFERENCES 69 VII. ANNEXES 73 Annex I. List of documents received from ODA RH/FP project coordinating office and used for document review. 73 Annex II. Ranking of Woredas Based on their Performance 76 Annex III. Discussion guide used to facilitate of Focus Group Discussions with CBRHAs 78 Annex IV. Discussion guide for Focus Group Discussion with Adolescents 81 Annex V. Guide for Expert Interview – Health Offices 83 Annex VI. Guide for Expert Interview – ODA Coordinators 87 Annex VII. In-depth interview guide for health workers 90 Evaluation of Reproductive Health/Family Planning Project Of Oromia Development Association (ODA) III LISTS OF TABLES Table 1 List of sampled woredas per zone and distribution of samples to zones and woredas, June 2009. 17 Table 2 Planned vs. Achieved selected Capacity Building Activities goals, 2000-2008, Ethiopia, 2009. 26 Table 3 Percentage distribution of Availability of CBRHAs and type of service they provide, by project zones, Ethiopia, 2009 . 27 Table 4 IEC materials distributed to support IEC activity, 2000-2008, Ethiopia, 2009. 29 Table 5 Total number of encounters with people on RH through IEC Activities by project zones and year; 2000-2008, Ethiopia, 2009.. 30 Table 6 Total number of Contraceptive methods distributed and CYP Generated by Method and project zone; 2000-2008, Ethiopia, 2009.. 34 Table 7 Cumulative Number of New Contraceptive users by method and year; 2000-2008, Ethiopia, 2009. 35 Table 8 Information related to Perceived quality of services and client satisfaction towards RH/FP service provided, Ethiopia, 2009. 38 Table 9 Socio-demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of participants, Ethiopia, 2009.: 41 Table 10 Percentage of all women and currently married women who know any contraceptive method, by specific method, Ethiopia, 2009. 43 Evaluation of Reproductive Health/Family Planning Project Of Oromia Development Association (ODA) IV Table 11 Percentage distribution of married women by type of contraceptive methods used in the last five years, Ethiopia, 2009. 46 Table 12 Percentage of all and currently married women currently using contraceptive method by specific method, age, zone, and level of education, Ethiopia, 2009. 47 Table 13 Reasons for discontinuation of contraceptives and Future Intention of contraceptive use, Ethiopia, 2009. 51 Table 14 Distribution of women who had a live birth in the past five years and received ANC by provider during pregnancy for the most recent birth, Ethiopia, 2009. 52 Table 15 Percent of women who had a live birth in the five years by the timing of the first visit and number of ANC visits for the most recent birth, Ethiopia, 2009. 53 Table 16 Comparison of Women Receiving ANC and Number of visits made during EDHS 2005, EGFHIE 2008, and current Evaluation, Ethiopia, 2009 54 Table 17 Percent of place of delivery and person providing assistance during delivery of live births in the five years by zone and level of education, Ethiopia, 2009. 55 Table 18 Percent of mothers delivered in the last five years who received PNC and time after delivery the first PNC received for the last live birth, Ethiopia, 2009. 57 Evaluation of Reproductive Health/Family Planning Project Of Oromia Development Association (ODA) V LISTS OF FIGURES Figure 1. An Evaluation framework used to assess the implementation of the program and the achievement of operational outcomes, Ethiopia, 2009. 15 Figure 2. Number of project Woredas by zone and year, 2000-2008, Ethiopia, 2009. 22 Figure 3. Percentage distribution of source of FP information among women of reproductive age group, Ethiopia, 2009 31 Figure 4. Trends of new contraceptive users by method and year; 2000-2008, Ethiopia, 2009. 36 Figure 5. Baseline, plan and achievement of Contraceptive Acceptance rate by project zone; 2000-2008, Ethiopia, 2009 37 Figure 6. Percent of respondents who indicated the project has helped them or their family by zones, Ethiopia, 2009 . 39 Figure 7. Percentage distribution of ever use of contraceptive methods among all women and currently married woman by zone, Ethiopia, 2009. 44 Figure 8. Percentage of all women and currently married women who have used any contraceptive method in the last five years by zones; Ethiopia, 2009. 45 Figure 9. Trends in Current Use of Contraception by type of methods used, 1999-2009, Ethiopia, 2009. 48 Figure 10. Percentage distribution of sources of contraceptives among current users, Ethiopia, 2009. 49 Evaluation of Reproductive Health/Family Planning Project Of Oromia Development Association (ODA) VI ACRONYMS AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome ANC Antenatal care ARHS Adolescent Reproductive Health Service CBD Community-based distribution CBRHA Community Based Reproductive Health Agent CPR Contraceptive Prevalence Rate CSA Central Statistical Agency CYP Couple-year protection DHS Demographic and Health Survey EDHS Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey EGFHIE Ethiopian Global Fund Health Impact Evaluation FGD Focus Group Discussion FP Family Planning HEWs Health Extension Workers HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus HTP Harmful Traditional Practice ICPD International Conference on Population and Development IDI In-depth Interview IEC Information, Education and Communication IUD Intra Uterine Devise LAM Lactational Amenorrhea Method MCH Maternal and Child Health NGOs Non-Governmental Organizations ODA Oromia Development Association OCP Oral Contraceptive Pills PNC Postnatal care REB Regional Education Bureau RH Reproductive Health RHB Regional Health Bureau SRH Sexual and Reproductive Health STDs Sexually Transmitted Diseases STIs Sexually Transmitted Infections TFR Total Fertility Rate TOT Training of Trainers TTBA Trained Traditional Birth Attendant UN United Nations VSC Voluntary Surgical Contraception WoHO Woreda Health Office ZHD Zonal Health Department Evaluation of Reproductive Health/Family Planning Project Of Oromia Development Association (ODA) VII ACKNOWLEDGMENT The Evaluation Team gratefully acknowledges the David & Lucile Packard Foundation and Oromia Development Association RH project for supporting this evaluation. Particularly our appreciation goes to Ato Sahlu Haile, W/ro Yemisrach Belayneh from David & Lucile Packard Foundation and Dr Mulugeta Hawas manager of ODA RH project previous. The Evaluation Team wishes to thankfully acknowledge the Zonal, and Woreda ODA RH project offices and staffs that participated in the evaluation process and sharing information and their views. The Principal Investigator thanks Dr. Girma Azene, Dr. Carla Decotelli, W/t Dildile Yohannes, Ato Dimitri Tibebe and Ato Bisrat Birhanu for their invaluable assistance for the completion of the study. Finally, we highly appreciate all the field coordinators, facilitators, and data collectors and, more importantly, the survey respondents, who were critical to the success of this evaluation. Evaluation of Reproductive Health/Family Planning Project Of Oromia Development Association (ODA) VIII EVALUATORS Dr. Wuleta Lemma: Principal Investigator, Assistant Professor Co-Director, Center for Global Health Equity School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine Tulane University 1440 Canal St. Ste 1191 New Orleans, LA 70112 Email: [email protected] Moreira dos Santos, Elizabeth: Consultant Evaluator, Full Professor and Researcher at National School of Public Health/ FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Jemal Aliy (MD, MPH): Consultant Evaluator, (TUTAPE) Dr. Girma Taye: Consultant Evaluator, (TUTAPE) Mr. Yibeltal Kifle: Consultant Evaluator, Lecturer
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • Tulu Kapi Nyota Min Ltd '09 Technical
    - Key Features - Exploration - Introduction - Mineralisation - Project Description, General Infrastructure and - Distribution of Mineralistation Accessibility - Deposit Type - Topography, Climate and Vegetation - Sampling Method and Approach - Legal Aspects and Tenure - Sample Preparation, Analysis and Security - Environmental Requirements - Mineralogical Studies and Mineral Processing - Country History - Data Verification and QA/QC - Country Profile and Economy - Adjacent Properties and Competitor Companies - Mining Sector of the Economy - Modelling and Mineral Resource Estimation IN THIS DOCUMENT - Historical Exploration and Operations in the Tulu - Conclusions Investors Report on the Kapi Area - References Tulu Kapi Gold Project, Ethiopia - Regional Geological Setting th - Local Geology as at 30 September 2009 KEY FEATURES Compliance: Venmyn utilises a comprehensive checklist incorporating all internationally required compliance requirements, in particular the Canadian National Instrument 43-101 and SAMREC/SAMVAL Codes for public reporting of mineral assets. The information quoted in this Prospectivity Review has been scrutinised in terms of this checklist and prepared for investors according to the principles of open and transparent disclosure embodied in the underlying codes for mineral resources reporting. Qualified Persons: Mr.Andy Clay, M.Sc. (Geol), M.Sc. (Min. Eng.), Dip.Bus.M., Pr.Sci.Nat., MSAIMM, FAusIMM, FGSSA,AAPG, M.Inst.D. Mr. Neil Mc Kenna, M.Sc. (Geol), Pr.Sci.Nat., MSAIMM, MGSSA, MIASSA, M.Inst.D. Mr. Richard Tayelor, B.Sc. Hons (Geol). MGSSA. Effective Date: 30th September 2009. Prepared For: Nyota Minerals Limeted (Nyota), previously Dwyka Resources Limited (Dwyka). Purpose: Review of the prospectivity and technical merits of the Tulu Kapi Gold Project in Ethiopia. Sources of Information: Public domain information as listed in the reference list, Nyota, Dwyka and Minerva Resources PLC internal reports and, presentations and Hellman & Schofield (Pty) Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Bulletin Ethiopia
    Humanitarian Bulletin Ethiopia Issue #7 10 May– 6 June 2021 In this issue HIGHLIGHTS P.1 Anticipatory action to mitigate drought impact. • Partners are P.2 IDP return ahead of the rainy season. implementing CERF- P.2 Over 55,000 newly displaced in East Wellega funded anticipatory action projects to mitigate the P.3 Catastrophe (IPC Phase 5) outcomes likely impact of drought and among households in Tigray: FEWS NET prevent a food security P.3 Access negotiation workshop held in Dire Dawa crisis. P.4 Desert Locust risks likely in parts of Somali, • The Federal and Regional Oromia and, SNNP Governments are preparing to implement a phased return/relocation plan for conflict-displaced people (IDPs) in various parts of the country ahead of the Kiremt/summer Anticipatory action to mitigate drought impact rainy season. The United Nations Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) has approved US$20 million for drought anticipatory action in Ethiopia. The aim is to mitigate the impact of drought by implementing relevant and timely interventions before a drought situation turns into a devastating food security crisis. This initiative is targeting chronically drought-hit areas in the southern, south-eastern, and north-eastern parts of the country. A number of projects have kicked-off after the agreed triggers in the Anticipatory Action Framework were met, including the forecast of below average spring rains and the level of food insecurity. A number of UN agencies are leading key projects. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) has an intervention targeting 117,000 households in Afar, Somali and SNNP Regions, aiming to ensure adequate food consumption levels and protect the livelihood of vulnerable households.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reactions of Limmu Oromo of Western Ethiopia During and After the Italian Occupation (1936-41)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE): E-Journals Historical Research Letter www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-3178 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0964 (Online) Vol.47, 2018 The Reactions of Limmu Oromo of Western Ethiopia During and After the Italian Occupation (1936-41) Fekede Sileshi Fufa 1 Ketebo Abdiyo(PhD) 2 1.College of Social Science Department of History, Sebeta Special Needs College of Teacher’s Education 2.Jimma University Abstract In this paper, it has been attempted to highlight the features of the five years administration system and the continuity and changes that took place during the Italy administration in the area. During the Italian Occupation, Limmu was the administrative center of the Italians for the Oromo of Western Anger River. Surprisingly, Limmu Oromo during the Italian occupation (1936-41) fought both the Italians and the naftañä settlers. According to genuine sources, during Italian Occupation (1936-1941) the naftañä-gabär system was removed in the study area. Accordingly, the most important event of this period was that the Limmu Oromo were librated from the naftañä rule by their leader, Fitawurari Duguma Jaldeso. Relatively speaking, according to many written materials and oral sources, the Italian administration was better than the former administration system in Limmu. The Italian Occupation was a land mark in the history of the gabärs in the surrounding region in general and that of Limmu in particular. Soon after they stationed at Ayana (the capital of Gidda-Kiramu Woreda), the Italian military station for the areas between the Abay and Angar, Italians successfully abolished the gabär system in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Aalborg Universitet Restructuring State and Society Ethnic
    Aalborg Universitet Restructuring State and Society Ethnic Federalism in Ethiopia Balcha, Berhanu Publication date: 2007 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication from Aalborg University Citation for published version (APA): Balcha, B. (2007). Restructuring State and Society: Ethnic Federalism in Ethiopia. SPIRIT. Spirit PhD Series No. 8 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. ? Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. ? You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain ? You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from vbn.aau.dk on: November 29, 2020 SPIRIT Doctoral Programme Aalborg University Kroghstraede 3-3.237 DK-9220 Aalborg East Phone: +45 9940 9810 Mail: [email protected] Restructuring State and Society: Ethnic Federalism in Ethiopia Berhanu Gutema Balcha SPIRIT PhD Series Thesis no. 8 ISSN: 1903-7783 © 2007 Berhanu Gutema Balcha Restructuring State and Society: Ethnic Federalism in Ethiopia SPIRIT – Doctoral Programme Aalborg University Denmark SPIRIT PhD Series Thesis no.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Nile Technical Regional Office
    . EASTERN NILE TECHNICAL REGIONAL OFFICE TRANSBOUNDARY ANALYSIS FINAL COUNTRY REPORT ETHIOPIA September 2006 This report was prepared by a consortium comprising Hydrosult Inc (Canada) the lead company, Tecsult (Canada), DHV (The Netherlands) and their Associates Nile Consult (Egypt), Comatex Nilotica (Sudan) and A and T Consulting (Ethiopia) DISCLAIMER The maps in this Report are provided for the convenience of the reader. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in these maps do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Eastern Nile Technical Office (ENTRO) concerning the legal or constitutional status of any Administrative Region, State or Governorate, Country, Territory or Sea Area, or concerning the delimitation of any frontier. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT CRA CONTENTS DISCLAIMER ........................................................................................................ 2 LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................. viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................... x 1. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 1 1.2 Primary Objectives of the Watershed Management CRA ....................... 2 1.3 The Scope and Elements of Sustainable Watershed Management ........ 4 1.3.1 Watersheds and River Basins 4
    [Show full text]
  • WCBS III Supply Side Report 1
    Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Capacity Building in Collaboration with PSCAP Donors "Woreda and City Administrations Benchmarking Survey III” Supply Side Report Survey of Service Delivery Satisfaction Status Final Addis Ababa July, 2010 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The survey work was lead and coordinated by Berhanu Legesse (AFTPR, World Bank) and Ato Tesfaye Atire from Ministry of Capacity Building. The Supply side has been designed and analysis was produced by Dr. Alexander Wagner while the data was collected by Selam Development Consultants firm with quality control from Mr. Sebastian Jilke. The survey was sponsored through PSCAP’s multi‐donor trust fund facility financed by DFID and CIDA and managed by the World Bank. All stages of the survey work was evaluated and guided by a steering committee comprises of representatives from Ministry of Capacity Building, Central Statistical Agency, the World Bank, DFID, and CIDA. Large thanks are due to the Regional Bureaus of Capacity Building and all PSCAP executing agencies as well as PSCAP Support Project team in the World Bank and in the participating donors for their inputs in the Production of this analysis. Without them, it would have been impossible to produce. Table of Content 1 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key results by thematic areas............................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 Local government finance ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Region, Zone and Woreda Map of Oromia a M Tigray a Afar M H U Amhara a Uz N M
    35°0'0"E 40°0'0"E Administrative Region, Zone and Woreda Map of Oromia A m Tigray A Afar m h u Amhara a uz N m Dera u N u u G " / m r B u l t Dire Dawa " r a e 0 g G n Hareri 0 ' r u u Addis Ababa ' n i H a 0 Gambela m s Somali 0 ° b a K Oromia Ü a I ° o A Hidabu 0 u Wara o r a n SNNPR 0 h a b s o a 1 u r Abote r z 1 d Jarte a Jarso a b s a b i m J i i L i b K Jardega e r L S u G i g n o G A a e m e r b r a u / K e t m uyu D b e n i u l u o Abay B M G i Ginde e a r n L e o e D l o Chomen e M K Beret a a Abe r s Chinaksen B H e t h Yaya Abichuna Gne'a r a c Nejo Dongoro t u Kombolcha a o Gulele R W Gudetu Kondole b Jimma Genete ru J u Adda a a Boji Dirmeji a d o Jida Goro Gutu i Jarso t Gu J o Kembibit b a g B d e Berga l Kersa Bila Seyo e i l t S d D e a i l u u r b Gursum G i e M Haro Maya B b u B o Boji Chekorsa a l d Lalo Asabi g Jimma Rare Mida M Aleltu a D G e e i o u e u Kurfa Chele t r i r Mieso m s Kegn r Gobu Seyo Ifata A f o F a S Ayira Guliso e Tulo b u S e G j a e i S n Gawo Kebe h i a r a Bako F o d G a l e i r y E l i Ambo i Chiro Zuria r Wayu e e e i l d Gaji Tibe d lm a a s Diga e Toke n Jimma Horo Zuria s e Dale Wabera n a w Tuka B Haru h e N Gimbichu t Kutaye e Yubdo W B Chwaka C a Goba Koricha a Leka a Gidami Boneya Boshe D M A Dale Sadi l Gemechis J I e Sayo Nole Dulecha lu k Nole Kaba i Tikur Alem o l D Lalo Kile Wama Hagalo o b r Yama Logi Welel Akaki a a a Enchini i Dawo ' b Meko n Gena e U Anchar a Midega Tola h a G Dabo a t t M Babile o Jimma Nunu c W e H l d m i K S i s a Kersana o f Hana Arjo D n Becho A o t
    [Show full text]
  • The Impacts of Microcredit: Evidence from Ethiopia†
    American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2015, 7(1): 54–89 http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/app.20130475 The Impacts of Microcredit: Evidence from Ethiopia† By Alessandro Tarozzi, Jaikishan Desai, and Kristin Johnson* We use data from a randomized controlled trial conducted in 2003–2006 in rural Amhara and Oromiya Ethiopia to study the impacts of increasing access to microfinance( on a) number of socioeconomic outcomes, including income from agriculture, animal husbandry, nonfarm self-employment, labor supply, schooling and indicators of women’s empowerment. We document that despite sub- stantial increases in borrowing in areas assigned to treatment the null of no impact cannot be rejected for a large majority of outcomes. JEL G21, I20, J13, J16, O13, O16, O18 ( ) eginning in the 1970s, with the birth of the Grameen Bank in Bangladesh, Bmicrocredit has played a prominent role among development initiatives. Many proponents claim that microfinance has had enormously positive effects among borrowers. However, the rigorous evaluation of such claims of success has been complicated by the endogeneity of program placement and client selection, both common obstacles in program evaluations. Microfinance institutions MFIs typi- ( ) cally choose to locate in areas predicted to be profitable, and or where large impacts / are expected. In addition, individuals who seek out loans in areas served by MFIs and that are willing and able to form joint-liability borrowing groups a model often ( preferred by MFIs are likely different from others who do not along a number of ) observable and unobservable factors. Until recently, the results of most evaluations could not be interpreted as conclusively causal because of the lack of an appropriate control group see Brau and Woller 2004 and Armendáriz de Aghion and Morduch ( 2005 for comprehensive early surveys .
    [Show full text]
  • D.Table 9.5-1 Number of PCO Planned 1
    D.Table 9.5-1 Number of PCO Planned 1. Tigrey No. Woredas Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Expected Connecting Point 1 Adwa 13 Per Filed Survey by ETC 2(*) Hawzen 12 3(*) Wukro 7 Per Feasibility Study 4(*) Samre 13 Per Filed Survey by ETC 5 Alamata 10 Total 55 1 Tahtay Adiyabo 8 2 Medebay Zana 10 3 Laelay Mayechew 10 4 Kola Temben 11 5 Abergele 7 Per Filed Survey by ETC 6 Ganta Afeshum 15 7 Atsbi Wenberta 9 8 Enderta 14 9(*) Hintalo Wajirat 16 10 Ofla 15 Total 115 1 Kafta Humer 5 2 Laelay Adiyabo 8 3 Tahtay Koraro 8 4 Asegede Tsimbela 10 5 Tselemti 7 6(**) Welkait 7 7(**) Tsegede 6 8 Mereb Lehe 10 9(*) Enticho 21 10(**) Werie Lehe 16 Per Filed Survey by ETC 11 Tahtay Maychew 8 12(*)(**) Naeder Adet 9 13 Degua temben 9 14 Gulomahda 11 15 Erob 10 16 Saesi Tsaedaemba 14 17 Alage 13 18 Endmehoni 9 19(**) Rayaazebo 12 20 Ahferom 15 Total 208 1/14 Tigrey D.Table 9.5-1 Number of PCO Planned 2. Affar No. Woredas Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Expected Connecting Point 1 Ayisaita 3 2 Dubti 5 Per Filed Survey by ETC 3 Chifra 2 Total 10 1(*) Mile 1 2(*) Elidar 1 3 Koneba 4 4 Berahle 4 Per Filed Survey by ETC 5 Amibara 5 6 Gewane 1 7 Ewa 1 8 Dewele 1 Total 18 1 Ere Bti 1 2 Abala 2 3 Megale 1 4 Dalul 4 5 Afdera 1 6 Awash Fentale 3 7 Dulecha 1 8 Bure Mudaytu 1 Per Filed Survey by ETC 9 Arboba Special Woreda 1 10 Aura 1 11 Teru 1 12 Yalo 1 13 Gulina 1 14 Telalak 1 15 Simurobi 1 Total 21 2/14 Affar D.Table 9.5-1 Number of PCO Planned 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Review for the Lions-Carter Center Sightfirst River Blindness
    Summary 2007 Program Review for The Lions-Carter Center SightFirst River Blindness Programs Cameroon, Ethiopia, Nigeria, OEPA, Sudan, and Uganda 6 – 8 February 2008 The Carter Center Atlanta, GA August 2008 Donors to The Carter Center River Blindness, Lymphatic Filariasis, and Schistosomiasis Programs Phyllis T. Albritton Mid-Continent University The Baxter International Foundation Anthony Moores Bruce and Patricia Bayuk Jennifer Moores Bryan Beck John and Becky Moores Orville and Ruth Brown Mary I. Naylor Tom and Miriam Bryan The Osprey Foundation of Maryland Warren E. Buffett The P Twenty-One Foundation Thomas Burns John and Sandra Parker Centra Industries, Inc. George Peake Mark Chandler and Christina Kenrick Steve and Robin Perez Community Presbyterian Church of Mount Prospect Edward and Anne Rand John and Claire Cross Randstad North America Janice Culpepper Nancy Ryzenman Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fund Felicia Sanchez Glenn and Karen Doshay Mark and Maureen Sanders Philip and Marla Doss The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Stanley and Wendy Drezek Jeffrey A. Schneider Henry N. Easley Timothy R. Schwertfeger and Gail Waller Enterprise Middle School The Scripps Research Institute The Franklin Mint Robert and Pearl Seymour Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Shin Poong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Patricia I. Gillis Southminster Presbyterian Church GlaxoSmithKline PLC Dorcel M. Spengler Global Health Council The Starr Foundation William Heasom Julia Suddath-Ranne and Micheal Ranne Hellgate High School Paul C. Swanda The Emery C. Jr./Nancy F. Herman Fund Lawrence and Susan Taylor John C. and Karyl Kay Hughes Foundation Tinsley Foundation Izumi Foundation Earl and Marilyn Tish Mavis D. James The UPS Foundation, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Enabling Successful Migration for Youth in Addis Ababa Quantitative Survey
    Enabling Successful Migration for Youth in Addis Ababa Quantitative Survey Z1 Respondent Code Sequential number according to order of the respondent (101, 102, 103, etc.) Z2 Interviewer Code Z3 Date of Interview (DD/MM/YY) / / 1 8 Z4 Location Code Based on site Z5 Start time of Interview (according to Western clock) : CONSENT: Did you complete the entire verbal script for consent, answer all questions from the respondent, and and receive a fully informed consent to participate? Investigator name: Investigator Signature: Are you willing to go ahead? Yes → continue to A1 No → stop the survey, thank the respondent, and approach another potential respondent 1 I. DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS A1 How old are you? Enter age A2 Sex 0 = male 1 = female 8 = don’t know 9 = refused to answer A3 Where in Ethiopia are you from? Enter code for region Enter code for zone Enter name of woreda Enter name of kebele A4 Where in Addis Ababa do you live? Enter code for subcity Enter name of district A5 Which year did you first arrive in Enter year (according to Western Addis? calendar, not Ethiopian) A6 How much time (cumulative) have Enter total number of months you spent in Addis Ababa? A7 What is your marital status? 1 = married 2 = engaged, 3 = in a partnership 4 = single 5 = widowed 6 = divorced/separated 8 = don’t know 9 = refused to answer A8 Do you have any children? 0 = no 1 = yes 8 = don’t know 9 = refused to answer A9 What is your religion? 1 = Ethiopian Orthodox 2 = Muslim 3 = Protestant 4 = Traditional/local 5 = Catholic 6 = Other 8 = Don’t know
    [Show full text]