DOCSLIB.ORG

Mapping Media Policy in Indonesia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mapping Media Policy in Indonesia Mapping Media Policy in Indonesia Report Series Engaging Media, Empowering Society: Assessing Media Policy and Governance in Indonesia through the Lens of Citizens’ Rights Oleh A joint research project of Yanuar Nugroho Muhammad Fajri Siregar Shita Laksmi Supported by Mapping Media Policy in Indonesia Published in Indonesia in 2013 by Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance Jl. Siaga Raya (Siaga Baru), Komp BAPPENAS No 43. Pejaten Barat, Pasar Minggu , Jakarta Selatan 12130 Indonesia. www.cipg.or.id Cover designed by FOSTROM (www.fostrom.com); all rights reserved. Except where otherwise noted, content on this report is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License Some rights reserved. How to cite this report: (Nugroho, Siregar, and Laksmi, 2012) - Nugroho, Y., Siregar, MF., Laksmi, S. 2012. Mapping Media Policy in Indonesia. Report Series. Engaging Media, Empowering Society: Assessing media policy and governance in Indonesia through the lens of citizens’ rights. Research collaboration of Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance and HIVOS Regional Office Southeast Asia, funded by Ford Foundation. Jakarta: CIPG and HIVOS. Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance i Mapping media policy in Indonesia Acknowledgements The research was funded by the Ford Foundation Indonesia Office and undertaken by the Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance (CIPG), Jakarta and HIVOS Regional Office Southeast Asia Principal Investigator : Dr. Yanuar Nugroho, University of Manchester Co-investigator (CIPG), Coordinator : Mirta Amalia Co-investigator (HIVOS) : Shita Laksmi Researchers (CIPG) : Muhammad Fajri Siregar Leonardus Kristianto Nugraha Dinita Andriani Putri Academic advisors : Dr. B. Herry-Priyono, STF Driyarkara, Jakarta Dr. Sulfikar Amir, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Throughout the research, the team received huge support and assistance from numerous Indonesian media companies, public policy makers, civil society contacts and partners, and individuals who participated in our study in survey, interviews, focus group discussions and workshops. We particularly owe thanks and gratitude to Ignatius Haryanto, Paulus Widiyanto, R. Kristiawan, Aliansi Jurnalis Independen (Alliance of Independent Journalists), Ria Ernunsari, Ahmad Suwandi, all participants of the CREAME (Critical Research Methodology) training, Combine Resource Institution and Ambar Sari Dewi (Yogyakarta), our compatriots in community radios; Radio Sadewa, JRKY (Yogyakarta Network of Community Radio), and the interns at CIPG: Satrya P. Adhitama and Jauharul Anwar, who have been a big help during the research. Kathryn Morrison read and corrected the language of this report. Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance iii Mapping media policy in Indonesia List of abbreviations AJI Aliansi Jurnalis Independen / Alliance of independent journalists APJII Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia/ Indonesian Internet Service Provider Association ATVJI Asosiasi Televisi Jaringan Indonesia / Association of Indonesian Network Television ATVSI Asosiasi TV Swasta Indonesia/ Association of Indonesian Private TV Broadcasters ATVLI Asosiasi Televisi Lokal Indonesia / Association of Indonesian Local TV Broadcasters BAPEPAM-LK Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal – Lembaga Keuangan / Supervisory Body for Capital Market and Financial Institutions BPS Central Bureau for Statistic BPPT Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi / The Agency for The Assessment and Application of Technology BRTI Badan Regulasi Telekomunikasi Indonesia / Indonesia Telecommunication Regulation Body Deppen Departemen Penerangan / Department of Information EMTEK Elang Mahkota Teknologi FTA Free To Air (for Television) IPPP Izin Prinsip Penyelenggaraan Penyiaran / Principal Broadcasting Permit ISAI Institut Arus Informasi Indonesia / Institute for the Study of Free Flow Information ISP Internet Service Provider ITU International Telecommunication Union JPNN Jawa Pos National Network KIDP Koalisi Independen untuk Demokratisasi Penyiaran / Independent Coalition for the democratisation of Broadcasting KPI Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia / Indonesian Broadcasting Commission KPPU Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha / Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition KUHP Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana / Criminal Code MASTEL Masyarakat Telematika Indonesia / Indonesian Telematics Society MNC Media Nusantara Citra MPPI Masyarakat Pers dan Penyiaran Indonesia / Indonesian Press and Broadcasting Society NAP Network Access Provider NGO Non-governmental organisation OSF Open Society Foundation POP Point of Presence PP Peraturan Pemerintah / Government regulation Prolegnas Program Legislasi Nasional / National Legislation Program PRSSNI Persatuan Radio Siaran Swasta Niaga Indonesia / Indonesian Private Commercial Radio Broadcasters Association PWI Persatuan Wartawan Indonesia / Indonesian Journalists Union RCTI Rajawali Citra Televisi Indonesia RRI Radio Republik Indonesia / Radio of the Republic of Indonesia SCTV Surya Citra Televisi Indonesia SIUPP Surat Izin Usaha Penerbitan Pers / Press Publication Enterprise Permit SPS Serikat Penerbit Surat Kabar / Newspaper Publisher Union TVRI Televisi Republik Indonesia / Television of the Republic of Indonesia USO Universal Service Obligation UU Undang-Undang / Law Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance v Mapping media policy in Indonesia Executive Summary The aim of this research is to highlight the trajectory of media policy in Indonesia and to assess its impacts on the different forms of media themselves and on the citizens and their rights, particularly with regards to their media rights. Such rights, in this study, are referred to as the right to access media infrastructure, to access trustworthy information and quality media content, and to participate in the media policymaking process. We have arrived at several key findings, as outlined below. 1. Historically, the 1998 reformasi (reform) was a major turning point and is understood as being the main trigger in ensuring the citizen’s rights to media. Following this came the second amendment of the UUD 1945 and the Human Rights Law No 39/1999 that guaranteed the right to information and media for citizens. Two policies in the post reformasi period constitute the main media regulatory framework, i.e. the Press Law No 40/1999 and the Broadcasting Law No 32/2002. These two Laws, normatively, are in the right direction: they have ensured the basic precondition for citizens to practice the freedom of expression and speech. However, when it comes to implementation, the story is different. 2. Media policies have failed to regulate the media as an industry. Existing policies are incapable of mitigating the excessively profit-driven logic of the media. As such, policymakers and state officials have failed to set a clear limitation between monopoly and oligopoly. The absence of a particular policy that acknowledges the commercial aspects of media industry and particularly governs its activities, is one of the enabling factors of its rapid expansion. Although Broadcasting Law No 32/2002 inserts limiting variables in the Article 18 and prohibits cross ownership (kepemilikan silang), the following Government Regulation No 50/2005 fails to pick up on the matter. As a future agenda, media policies need to treat the media industry as a particular sector, considering that the industry is using public goods and should not be given the freedom to utilise them according to its own interests. The key here is realising that media industry must be separated from other industries, as its impact exceeds rational economic calculations. 3. A bigger impact on media, and citizen’s rights to media, are to a great extent imposed by non-media regulating policies. Examples of such policies are the Electronic Transaction and Information (ITE) Law No 11/2008, Pornography Law No 44/2008, and the Criminal Code (KUHP). These policies are often steered by the arguments of public morality and contain vague, unclear definitions in regulations. Citizens and media workers are thereby always in danger of being criminalised and accused of defamation. The use of these vague articles is also the easiest way to shut the opinions of the public down. Public opinion is not only hampered by policies, but also by the industry’s agenda. Self-censorship practices and the vested interests of media owners are apparent in the agenda-setting of the media, and threaten the existence of an open public sphere. 4. The implementation of the siaran berjaringan (network-based broadcasting) system remains Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance vii Mapping media policy in Indonesia central in democratising the broadcasting system. Thereby, revising the Broadcasting Law will be a crucial test for everyone involved, as is its implementation. The failure of its implementation will significantly contribute to the homogenisation of media, and harm the principles of diversity of content and diversity of ownership. The system is seen as a threat to the industry and has been constantly tolerated by both state authorities and industry. As a result, Jakarta-based TV stations have extended their reach and domination over local TV channels and broadcasters. The end beneficiary however, namely the citizen, is left with more choice of channels, but less option in content. 5. In regard to the failure of implementing the siaran berjaringan (network-based broadcasting) system, private broadcasting has dominated the broadcasting scene and is the main, when not sole, choice
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Indonesia in View a CASBAA Market Research Report
    Indonesia in View A CASBAA Market Research Report In Association with Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 6 1.1 Large prospective market providing key challenges are overcome 6 1.2 Fiercely competitive pay TV environment 6 1.3 Slowing growth of paying subscribers 6 1.4 Nascent market for internet TV 7 1.5 Indonesian advertising dominated by ftA TV 7 1.6 Piracy 7 1.7 Regulations 8 2. FTA in Indonesia 9 2.1 National stations 9 2.2 Regional “network” stations 10 2.3 Local stations 10 2.4 FTA digitalization 10 3. The advertising market 11 3.1 Overview 11 3.2 Television 12 3.3 Other media 12 4. Pay TV Consumer Habits 13 4.1 Daily consumption of TV 13 4.2 What are consumers watching 13 4.3 Pay TV consumer psychology 16 5. Pay TV Environment 18 5.1 Overview 18 5.2 Number of players 18 5.3 Business models 20 5.4 Challenges facing the industry 21 5.4.1 Unhealthy competition between players and high churn rate 21 5.4.2 Rupiah depreciation against US dollar 21 5.4.3 Regulatory changes 21 5.4.4 Piracy 22 5.5 Subscribers 22 5.6 Market share 23 5.7 DTH is still king 23 5.8 Pricing 24 5.9 Programming 24 5.9.1 Premium channel mix 25 5.9.2 SD / HD channel mix 25 5.9.3 In-house / 3rd party exclusive channels 28 5.9.4 Football broadcast rights 32 5.9.5 International football rights 33 5.9.6 Indonesian Soccer League (ISL) 5.10 Technology 35 5.10.1 DTH operators’ satellite bands and conditional access system 35 5.10.2 Terrestrial technologies 36 5.10.3 Residential DTT services 36 5.10.4 In-car terrestrial service 36 5.11 Provincial cable operators 37 5.12 Players’ activities 39 5.12.1 Leading players 39 5.12.2 Other players 42 5.12.3 New entrants 44 5.12.4 Players exiting the sector 44 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Bab I Pendahuluan
    BAB I PENDAHULUAN 1.1. LATAR BELAKANG Salah satu isu penyiaran yang paling sensitif sejak dikeluarkannya UU No 32 Tahun adalah masalah Sistem Stasiun Jaringan (SSJ). Di saat wacana Sistem Stasiun Jaringan LPS televisi eksisting (RCTI, SCTV, MNCTV, Indosiar, Global TV, ANTV, Trans7, Trans TV, TV One dan Metro TV), beserta polemiknya terus bergulir di ranah penyiaran Indonesia, di sisi lain, praktik Sistem Stasiun Jaringan yang berasal dari televisi-televisi non eksisting (televisi lokal), seperti SUN TV Network, Kompas TV, JTV dan Bali TV juga menjadi perhatian berbagai kalangan karena dinilai terdapat sejumlah persoalan di dalam penyelenggaraannya. Sebagai perbandingan, pada model SSJ LPS TV eksisting, sepuluh stasiun televisi swasta yang mengudara secara nasional diwajibkan mendirikan badan hukum baru, melepas stasiun relai, melepas saham secara bertahap, serta pancaran siaran tidak boleh dilakukan hanya dengan perantara stasiun relai. Di mana praktiknya, status kepemilikan LPS televisi eksisting diturunkan menjadi kepemilikan lokal untuk menciptakan diversity of ownership dan diversity of content seperti yang diamanatkan Undang-Undang, namun pada penyelenggaraan SSJ televisi non eksisting, justru sebaliknya, terjadi akuisisi dan pembelian saham televisi-televisi lokal. Grup-grup besar seperti SUN TV Network yang merupakan anak perusahaan MNC, Kompas TV dari kelompok Kompas Gramedia begitu agresif bermitra dan bersinergi dengan stasiun-stasiun televisi lokal untuk membentuk jaringan, serta memperluas daya siar ke berbagai penjuru Tanah Air. Uki Hastama, anggota dari Asosiasi Televisi Swasta Indonesia (ATVLSI), pengamat media dan konsultan televisi lokal, kepada peneliti, menyampaikan fakta tentang kondisi dunia penyiaran yang sekarang ini tengah diwarnai 1 perburuan dan persaingan untuk membeli stasiun-stasiun televisi lokal. Uki menyebut SUN TV, serta kelompok Kompas Gramedia yang akan membuat televisi jaringan KompasTV, sangat gencar meminang televisi-televisi yang memiliki Izin Penyelenggara Penyiaran (izin frekuensi) di berbagai daerah.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Owns the Broadcasting Television Network Business in Indonesia?
    Network Intelligence Studies Volume VI, Issue 11 (1/2018) Rendra WIDYATAMA Károly Ihrig Doctoral School of Management and Business University of Debrecen, Hungary Communication Department University of Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia Case WHO OWNS THE BROADCASTING Study TELEVISION NETWORK BUSINESS IN INDONESIA? Keywords Regulation, Parent TV Station, Private TV station, Business orientation, TV broadcasting network JEL Classification D22; L21; L51; L82 Abstract Broadcasting TV occupies a significant position in the community. Therefore, all the countries in the world give attention to TV broadcasting business. In Indonesia, the government requires TV stations to broadcast locally, except through networking. In this state, there are 763 private TV companies broadcasting free to air. Of these, some companies have many TV stations and build various broadcasting networks. In this article, the author reveals the substantial TV stations that control the market, based on literature studies. From the data analysis, there are 14 substantial free to network broadcast private TV broadcasters but owns by eight companies; these include the MNC Group, EMTEK, Viva Media Asia, CTCorp, Media Indonesia, Rajawali Corpora, and Indigo Multimedia. All TV stations are from Jakarta, which broadcasts in 22 to 32 Indonesian provinces. 11 Network Intelligence Studies Volume VI, Issue 11 (1/2018) METHODOLOGY INTRODUCTION The author uses the Broadcasting Act 32 of 2002 on In modern society, TV occupies a significant broadcasting and the Government Decree 50 of 2005 position. All shareholders have an interest in this on the implementation of free to air private TV as a medium. Governments have an interest in TV parameter of substantial TV network. According to because it has political effects (Sakr, 2012), while the regulation, the government requires local TV business people have an interest because they can stations to broadcast locally, except through the benefit from the TV business (Baumann and broadcasting network.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting Transnational Media Flow in Nusantara: Cross-Border Content Broadcasting in Indonesia and Malaysia
    Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. 49, No. 2, September 2011 Revisiting Transnational Media Flow in Nusantara: Cross-border Content Broadcasting in Indonesia and Malaysia Nuurrianti Jalli* and Yearry Panji Setianto** Previous studies on transnational media have emphasized transnational media organizations and tended to ignore the role of cross-border content, especially in a non-Western context. This study aims to fill theoretical gaps within this scholarship by providing an analysis of the Southeast Asian media sphere, focusing on Indonesia and Malaysia in a historical context—transnational media flow before 2010. The two neighboring nations of Indonesia and Malaysia have many things in common, from culture to language and religion. This study not only explores similarities in the reception and appropriation of transnational content in both countries but also investigates why, to some extent, each had a different attitude toward content pro- duced by the other. It also looks at how governments in these two nations control the flow of transnational media content. Focusing on broadcast media, the study finds that cross-border media flow between Indonesia and Malaysia was made pos- sible primarily in two ways: (1) illicit or unintended media exchange, and (2) legal and intended media exchange. Illicit media exchange was enabled through the use of satellite dishes and antennae near state borders, as well as piracy. Legal and intended media exchange was enabled through state collaboration and the purchase of media rights; both governments also utilized several bodies of laws to assist in controlling transnational media content. Based on our analysis, there is a path of transnational media exchange between these two countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Daftar Pustaka
    DAFTAR PUSTAKA A.Referensi Buku Arifin, Anwar. Sistem Penyiaran Indonesia. Jakarta: Pustaka Indonesia untuk Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Persada Indonesia Y.A.I, 2012. Armando, Ade.Televisi Jakarta Di Atas Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Bentang, 2011. Djamal, Hidajanto, dan Andi Fachrudin. Dasar-Dasar Penyiaran, Sejarah, Organisasi, Operasional dan Regulasi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011. Judhariksawan. Hukum Penyiaran. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2010. M.A, Morissan. Manajemen Media Penyiaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2008. Marzuki, Mahmud, Peter. Penelitian Hukum, Edisi Pertama, Cetakan ke-2. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 2006. Masduki. Regulasi Penyiaran Dari Otoriter ke Liberal. Yogyakarta: LKis, 2007. McQuail, Dennis. Teori Komunikasi Massa. Jakarta: Erlangga, 1987. Mufid, Muhammad. Komunikasi dan Regulasi Penyiaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2005. Mulgan, Geoff. Politik dalam Sebuah Era Anti-Politik, Jakarta: Yayasan untuk Indonesia. 1993. Nugroho, Y., Siregar, MF., Laksimi, S. (2012). Memetakan Kebijakan Media di Indonesia (Edisi Bahasa Indonesia). Laporan. Bermedia, Memberdayakan Masyarakat: Memahami kebijakan dan tatakelola media di Indonesia melalui kacamata hak warga negara. Kerjasama riset antara Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance dan HIVOS Kantor Regional Asia Tenggara, didanai oleh Ford Fondation. Jakarta: CIPG dan HIVOS. Putra, Fadillah. Partai Politik dan Kebijakan Publik, Yogyakarta: Averroes Press- Pustaka Pelajar, 2003. Rachbini, J, Didik. Ekonomi Politik, Paradigma dan Teori Pilihan Publik, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2002. Rianto, Puji dkk. Kepemilikan dan Intervensi Siaran. Yogyakarta: Pemantau Regulasi dan Regulator Media, 2014. 118 Rivers L. William. Media Massa dan Masyarakat Modern Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2004. Rodman, George. Mass Media In a Changing World. United States: The McGraw-Hill, 2006. Siregar, Effendi, Amir. Mengawal Demokratisasi Media: Menolak Konsentrasi, Membangun Keberagaman.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/112924 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2018-07-08 and may be subject to change. Kinderen en Media in Indonesië: Industrie, Boodschap en Publiek Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. mr. S.C.J.J. Kortmann, volgens besluit van het college van decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 9 oktober 2013 om 16.30 uur precies door Hendriyani geboren op 5 September 1976 te Jakarta, Indonesië Promotoren : Prof. dr. L. S. J. d’Haenens Prof. dr. J.W. J. Beentjes (Universiteit van Amsterdam) Copromotor : Dr. E. Hollander Manuscriptcommissie : Prof. dr. C. J. Hamelink (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) Prof. dr. J. L. H. Bardoel Prof. dr. J. M. A. M. Janssens Kinderen en Media in Indonesië: Industrie, Boodschap en Publiek/Hendriyani Sociale Wetenschappen, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, Proefschrift ISBN 978-94-6191-826-0 © Hendriyani Alle rechten voorbehouden. Niets uit deze uitgave mag worden verveelvuldigd, opgeslagen in een geautomatiseerd gegevensbestand, of openbaar gemaakt, in enige vorm of op enige wijze, hetzij elektronisch of mechanisch, door fotokopieȅn, opnamen, of op enige andere manier zonder voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van de auteur. Children and Media in Indonesia: Industries, Messages, and Audiences Doctoral Thesis to obtain the degree of doctor from Radboud University Nijmegen on the authority of the Rector Magnificus prof. dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Bab 2 Industri Dan Regulasi Penyiaran Di Indonesia
    BAB 2 INDUSTRI DAN REGULASI PENYIARAN DI INDONESIA 2.1. Lembaga Penyiaran di Indonesia Dalam kehidupan sehari-hari, istilah lembaga penyiaran seringkali dianggap sama artinya dengan istilah stasiun penyiaran. Menurut Peraturan Menkominfo No 43 Tahun 2009, yang ditetapkan 19 Oktober 2009, lembaga penyiaran adalah penyelenggara penyiaran, baik Lembaga Penyiaran Publik, Lembaga Penyiaran Swasta, Lembaga Penyiaran Komunitas, maupun Lembaga Penyiaran Berlangganan yang dalam melaksanakan tugas, fungsi dan tanggungjawabnya berpedoman pada peraturan perundangan yang berlaku. Jika ditafsirkan, lembaga penyiaran adalah salah satu elemen dalam dunia atau sistem penyiaran. Dengan demikian walau lembaga penyiaran bisa dilihat sebagai segala kegiatan yang berhubungan dengan pemancarluasan siaran saja, namun secara implisit ia merupakan keseluruhan yang utuh dari lembaga-lembaga penyiaran (sebagai lembaga yang memiliki para pendiri, tujuan pendiriannya/visi dan misi, pengelola, perlengkapan fisik), dengan kegiatan operasional dalam menjalankan tujuan-tujuan penyiaran, serta tatanan nilai, dan peraturan dengan perangkat-perangkat regulatornya. Sedangkan stasiun penyiaran adalah tempat di mana program acara diproduksi/diolah untuk dipancarluaskan melalui sarana pemancaran dan/atau sarana transmisi di darat, laut atau antariksa dengan menggunakan spektrum frekuensi radio melalui udara, kabel, dan/atau media lainnya untuk dapat diterima secara serentak dan bersamaan oleh masyarakat dengan perangkat penerima siaran. Sedangkan penyiaran adalah kegiatan pemancarluasan
    [Show full text]
  • Pt Mahaka Media Tbk. Dan Entitas Anak
    DAFTAR ISI 06 PROFIL PERSEROAN CORPORATE PROFILE Visi Misi & Filosofi 8 Vision Mission & Philosophy Sekilas Mahaka Media 10 Mahaka Media at a Glance Jejak Langkah Perseroan 14 Corporate Milestone Bidang Usaha 18 Line of Business Struktur Organisasi 20 Organization Structure Diagram Mahaka Media & Entitas Anak 2015 22 Mahaka Media Chart & Subsidiaries 2015 Struktur Kepemilikan Saham 24 06 Share Ownership Structure Kronologis Pencatatan Saham 25 Share Listing Chronology Kapitalisasi Pasar 25 Market Capitalization Komposisi Pemegang Saham 26 Shareholder Composition Informasi Harga Saham Dalam 2 (Dua) Tahun Terakhir 27 Stock Price Information The Last 2 (Two)Years Harga Saham 27 Quaterly Stock Price Ikhtisar Keuangan 28 Financial Highlights 2011-2015 34128 34 LAPORAN MANAJEMEN MANAGEMENT REPORT Sambutan Komisaris Utama 36 Foreword from The President Commissioner Dewan Komisaris 40 Board of Commissioners Laporan Direktur Utama 44 Report from The President Director Dewan Direksi 50 Board of The Directors 64 Kode Etik 54 Code of Ethics 1 Sumber Daya Manusia 58 Human Resources Data Karyawan 59 Employees Data Penghargaan & Sertfikasi 61 Award & Certification 64 TINJAUAN OPERASIONAL OPERATING REVIEW Prospek Usaha 2016 66 Business Prospect 2016 ii Mahaka Media Annual Report 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS KINERJA 2015 72 2015 PERFORMANCE PT Republika Media Mandiri (Harian Republika) 76 PT Pustaka Abdi Bangsa (Republika Penerbit) 80 PT Republika Media Visual (RMV) 86 PT Avabanindo Perkasa (Mahaka Advertising) 92 PT Media Golfindo (Golf Digest) 96 PT Metromakmur
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Republik Indonesia Surakarta, 1945-1960S: Its Role in Efforts to Maintain Indonesian Independence and the Formation of National Culture
    Indonesian Historical Studies, Vol. 1, No. 2, 138-153 © 2017 Radio Republik Indonesia Surakarta, 1945-1960s: Its Role in Efforts to Maintain Indonesian Independence and the Formation of National Culture Dhanang Respati Puguh Department of History, Faculty of Humanities, Diponegoro University * Corresponding Author: [email protected] Abstract This article discusses the role of Radio Republik Indonesia (RRI, The Radio of RepuBlic of Indonesia) Surakarta in the period 1945-1960s. In that period RRI Surakarta had two roles in the context of decolonization. In the period 1945-1949, RRI Surakarta had a role in the effort to maintain the independence of Indonesia. The RRI Surakarta employees struggled to maintain the existence of RRI Surakarta with rescueing the station and Received: transmitter so that the struggle of the Indonesian nation in defending the 8 DecemBer 2017 independence of Indonesia could Be Broadcasted to various parts. In the period 1950-1960s RRI Surakarta participated in efforts to formation a Accepted: 18 DecemBer 2017 national culture. When the discourse of national culture continued to Be discussed By the elite of Indonesia, since 1950 the Bureau of the Radio of RepuBlic of Indonesia had set the estaBlishment and the choice of ways to Build a national culture. In this connection, RRI should Be directed to build a national culture. Based on the policy of the Bureau of Radio of RepuBlic of Indonesia, RRI Surakarta realized that idea By organizing Javanese art Broadcasts (gamelan, wayang wong, kethoprak, and shadow puppets), “local entertainment” and national music, and organizing Radio Star Competition. RRI Surakarta Radio Star made an important role in the creation of popular music in Indonesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategi Pembelajaran Sejarah Berbasis Lagu-Lagu Perjuangan Dalam Konteks Kesadaran Nasionalisme
    STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN SEJARAH BERBASIS LAGU………| 1 STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN SEJARAH BERBASIS LAGU-LAGU PERJUANGAN DALAM KONTEKS KESADARAN NASIONALISME Brigida Intan Printina* Abstrak Di masa-masa kebangkitan nasional lagu-lagu perjuangan menjadi sarana vital dalam membangkitkan kesadaran nasional para pemuda bangsa. Namun, mayoritas pemuda saat ini tidak mampu menunjukkan semangat nasionalismenya karena kurang mengerti akan makna lagu-lagu perjuangan. Maraknya lagu asing semakin menggerus nilai nasionalisme. Penelitian ini menggunakan kualitatif deskriptif melalui studi pustaka. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengembangkan strategi pembelajaran sejarah agar setiap pemuda dapat membangun diri dan mampu membentuk kesadaran nasionalisme dengan menyanyikan dan menghayati lagu-lagu perjuangan di setiap kesempatan. Kata Kunci : strategi pembelajaran sejarah, lagu perjuangan, nasionalisme Pendahuluan kepada etnis Jawa atau salah satu budaya Tumbuh dan berkembangnya etnis di Nusantara, melainkan harus bersifat nasionalisme di Indonesia tidak semata- universal seperti dalam kedudukan musik mata didasarkan pada persamaan- diatonis. (R.M. Soedarsono, 1998 : 39). persamaan primordialistik, akan tetapi Di samping memiliki kemampuan sudah bersifat terbuka. Diilhami oleh cita- dalam pengajaran, guru juga harus cita kebangkitan nasional dari tahun 1908, mengembangkan strategi belajar mengajar. pada tanggal 28 Oktober 1928 para pemuda Salah satu cara untuk membentuk karakter Indonesia mengikrarkan Sumpah Pemuda, peserta didik dalam pembelajaran sejarah yaitu
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article (PDF)
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 136 2nd International Conference on Social and Political Development (ICOSOP 2017) The Power of the Screen: Releasing Oneself from the Influence of Capital Owners Puji Santoso Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara University (UMSU) Email: [email protected] Abstract— Indonesia’s Media has long played a pivotal role in every changing. The world’s dependence on political, economic, and cultural changes leads the media playing an active role in the change order. It is not uncommon that the media has always been considered as an effective means to control changes or the process of social transformation. In the current era of reformation, the press, especially television industry has been experiencing rapid development. This is triggered by the opportunities opened for capital owners to invest their money into media business of television. Furthermore, the entrepreneurs or the capital owners capitalize the benefits by establishing several media subsidiaries. They try to seize the freely opened opportunity to create journalistic works. The law stipulates that press freedom is a form of popular sovereignty based on the principles of democracy, justice, and legal sovereignty. The mandate of this law indicates that press freedom should reflect people’s sovereignty. The sovereign people are the people in power and have the power to potentially develop their life-force as much as possible. At present, Indonesia has over 15 national television stations, 12 of which are networked televisions, and no less than 250 local television stations. This number is projected to be increasing based on data on the number of lined up permit applicants registered at the Ministry of Communications and Information office (Kemenkominfo) or at the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission (KPI) office both at the central and regional levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitalism Vs Business Ethics in Indonesia's Television
    SEA - Practical Application of Science Volume VI, Issue 16 (1 / 2017) Rendra WIDYATAMA Károly Ihrig Doctoral School of Management and Business University of Debrecen, Hungary Communication Department University of Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia Case CAPITALISM VS BUSINESS ETHICS IN Study INDONESIA’S TELEVISION BROADCASTING Keywords Television Business, Capitalism, Business ethics, Broadcasting License, Broadcasting Guidelines JEL Classification D22; L50; L82; M20; P12 Abstract Generally, in every country, there is supervision of the television broadcasting system. In Indonesia, all television broadcasting is supervised by the Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia/KPI (Indonesian Broadcasting Commission). This commission oversees broadcast television, to ensure all TV broadcasts in Indonesia comply with government regulations. Often the KPI imposes sanctions, but frequent violations still occur. This article describes the results of research on the contradiction between business interests and ethics in the television industry in Indonesia. This study uses the method of evaluation research, where researchers analyze data, here in the form of sanctions documents released by broadcasting commissions. The results reveal that all national private television stations often violate regulations. They prioritize their business interests rather than follow broadcasting guidelines, especially since KPI does not have the full authority to grant and revoke a broadcasting license. The granting and revocation of permits remains under the authority of the government, where political lobbying plays a more significant role. 27 SEA - Practical Application of Science Volume VI, Issue 16 (1 / 2017) INTRODUCTION liberal economic tradition such as America does not provide the business arrangements for Each country has its own system to manage the television to broadcast using market mechanisms television broadcasting business.
    [Show full text]