Daftar Pustaka

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Daftar Pustaka DAFTAR PUSTAKA A.Referensi Buku Arifin, Anwar. Sistem Penyiaran Indonesia. Jakarta: Pustaka Indonesia untuk Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Persada Indonesia Y.A.I, 2012. Armando, Ade.Televisi Jakarta Di Atas Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Bentang, 2011. Djamal, Hidajanto, dan Andi Fachrudin. Dasar-Dasar Penyiaran, Sejarah, Organisasi, Operasional dan Regulasi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011. Judhariksawan. Hukum Penyiaran. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2010. M.A, Morissan. Manajemen Media Penyiaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2008. Marzuki, Mahmud, Peter. Penelitian Hukum, Edisi Pertama, Cetakan ke-2. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 2006. Masduki. Regulasi Penyiaran Dari Otoriter ke Liberal. Yogyakarta: LKis, 2007. McQuail, Dennis. Teori Komunikasi Massa. Jakarta: Erlangga, 1987. Mufid, Muhammad. Komunikasi dan Regulasi Penyiaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2005. Mulgan, Geoff. Politik dalam Sebuah Era Anti-Politik, Jakarta: Yayasan untuk Indonesia. 1993. Nugroho, Y., Siregar, MF., Laksimi, S. (2012). Memetakan Kebijakan Media di Indonesia (Edisi Bahasa Indonesia). Laporan. Bermedia, Memberdayakan Masyarakat: Memahami kebijakan dan tatakelola media di Indonesia melalui kacamata hak warga negara. Kerjasama riset antara Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance dan HIVOS Kantor Regional Asia Tenggara, didanai oleh Ford Fondation. Jakarta: CIPG dan HIVOS. Putra, Fadillah. Partai Politik dan Kebijakan Publik, Yogyakarta: Averroes Press- Pustaka Pelajar, 2003. Rachbini, J, Didik. Ekonomi Politik, Paradigma dan Teori Pilihan Publik, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2002. Rianto, Puji dkk. Kepemilikan dan Intervensi Siaran. Yogyakarta: Pemantau Regulasi dan Regulator Media, 2014. 118 Rivers L. William. Media Massa dan Masyarakat Modern Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2004. Rodman, George. Mass Media In a Changing World. United States: The McGraw-Hill, 2006. Siregar, Effendi, Amir. Mengawal Demokratisasi Media: Menolak Konsentrasi, Membangun Keberagaman. Jakarta: Kompas, 2014. Soekanto, Soerjono. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat,. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada, 1983. Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press, 2007 Sulistiowati. Aspek Hukum dan Realitas Bisnis Perusahaan Grup Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2010. Sunggono, Bambang. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada, 1997. Tim Pemantau Regulasi dan Regulator Media Ironi Eksistensi Regulator Media Di Era Demokrasi. Yogyakarta: Pemantau Regulasi dan Regulator media & Yayasan Tifa, 2011. Widjaja, Gunawan. Hak Individu dan Kolektif Para Pemegang Saham, Jakarta: Forum Sahabat, Jakarta, 2008. B. Jurnal Amir Effendi Siregar, Melawan dan Mencegah Monopoli Serta Membangun Keanekaragaman, Jurnal Sosial Demokrasi, Volume 3, No 1, Juli – September 2008. Eriyanto, Konsentrasi Kepemilikan Media dan Ancaman Ruang Publik, Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Volume 12 Nomor 2, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik UGM Yogyakarta, November 2008. Emmy Pangaribuan, Perusahaan Kelompok. Seri Hukum Dagang Fak.Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 1994. Hardijan Rusli. “Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Bagaimana?”, Law Review, Vol. V No. 3 Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pelita Harapan Tangerang, Maret 2006. 119 Mike Feintuck and Mike Varney, Media Regulation, Public Interest and The law, Second Edition, Edinburgh Univeristy Press Ltd, 2006. Meray Hendrik Mezak, “Jenis, Metode, dan Pendekatan dalam Penelitian Hukum”, Law Review, Vol. V No.3 Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pelita Harapan Tangerang, Maret 2006. C. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tentang Penyiaran.2002. Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 50 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Lembaga Penyiaran Swasta. 2005. Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas. 2007. Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tentang Organisasi Perangkat Desa. 2007. D. Putusan Peradilan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 78/PUU-IX/2011 perihal Pengujian Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2002 tentang Penyiaran terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi 20 Oktober 2012. Resolusi PBB No.217 A (III), 1948 sekalipun dalam bentuk deklarasi, akan DUHAM telah diterima secara luas sebagai hukum kebiasaan interntional yang mengikat negara-negara. Resolusi PBB No.2200 A (XXI), 1966 yang telah ditandatangani dan diratifikasi ratusan negara. E. Wawancara Drs. Amir Effendi Siregar, MA. Dosen Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta (UII ), 23 Oktober 2014. Masduki, M.si, MA. Dosen Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta (UII), 20 Oktober 2014 120 Drs. Ignatius Haryanto, MHum, Dosen Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Multimedia Nusantara, Tangerang (UMN), 20 Oktober 2014 Hendrayana, S.H., Tenaga Ahli Hukum Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia Pusat, 13 Oktober 2014 Dandhy Dwi Laksono, Anggota Aliansi Jurnalis Independen Indonesia Divisi Penyiaran dan Media Baru (AJI Pusat), 24 November 2014. F. Data Elektronik “Laporan Tahunan PT. Elang Mahkota Teknologi, Tbk Tahun 2013” <http://www.idx.co.id/idid/beranda/perusahaantercatat/laporankeuanganda ntahunan.aspx> diakses 16 September 2014 “Laporan Tahunan PT. Media Nusantara Citra Tbk, Tahun 2013” <http://www.idx.co.id/idid/beranda/perusahaantercatat/laporankeuanganda ntahunan.aspx> diakses 16 September 2014 “Laporan Tahunan PT. Mahaka Media Tbk Tahun 2013” <http://www.idx.co.id/idid/beranda/perusahaantercatat/laporankeuanganda ntahunan.aspx> diakses 16 September 2014 “PT. Visi Media Asia Tbk, Laporan Tahunan 2013 PT. Visi Media Asia Tbk”<http://www.idx.co.id/idid/beranda/perusahaantercatat/laporankeuan gandantahunan.aspx> diakses 16 September 2014 “Grup Kompas Media” < http://www.kompas.tv/front/profile/>, diakses 16 September 2014 “Perusahaan Induk” <http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perusahaan_induk>, 16 September 2014 “Matinya Media?” <http://remotivi.or.id/kupas/matinya-media>, 23 September 2014 “Kepemilikan Silang di Media Penyiaran” <http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/hol1335/font-sizel colorff0000bkepemilikan-silang-di-media-penyiaran-hfntbr-kebebasan-pers-atau- ancaman-demokrasi>, diakses 23 Sepetember 2014 “Demokrasi Ekonomi”, <http://www.berdikarionline.com>, diakses 29 September 2014. “Grup Indika” < http://www.netmedia.co.id/about>, diakses 10 November 2014. 121 “PT Media Inti Televisi Nusantara” <http://www.tempo.co/read/news/2010/03/02/114229265/TEMPO-TV- Kini-Disiarkan-27-TV-Lokal>, diakses 10 November 2014, “Ketentuan Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2002 Tentang Penyiaran terkait Haluan Dasar, Karaktersitik Penyiaran, dan Prinsip Dasar Penyiaran di Indonesia.”<http://www.google.co.id/url?url=http://www.kpi.go.id/downlo ad/regulasi/Ketentuan%2520UU%2520Penyiaran%2520terkait%2520Hal uan%2520Dasar,%2520Karakteristik,%2520dan%2520Prinsip%2520Dasa r%2520Penyiaran%2520di%2520Indonesia.doc&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&sa=U &ei=qJ1hVPHDJNGkuQTUlIHwDQ&ved=0CBMQFjAA&sig2=Yf4rIjr DwGoxnmp_3HgzoA&usg=AFQjCNHXdo2ix1CL9h5RHHU160y4Voo3 bA>, diakses 11 November 2014 “Company Profile MNCTV” <http://www.mnctv.com/>, diakses 13 November 2014 “Hary Tanoesoedibjo Kampanye Lewat Tayangan yanga da di medianya,”<http://www.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/politik/14/04/07/n 3ma6s-hary-tanoesoedibjo-kampanye-lewat-tayangan-yang-ada-di- medianya>, diakses pada tanggal 16 November 2014. “BeritaSatu Media Holdings” <http://beritasatumedia.com/content/aboutus/> diakses 19 November 2014 “Grup CT” < http://www.ctcorpora.com/about.php>, diakses 19 November 2014, “Grup Jawa Pos” < http://jtv.co.id/about-us/>, diakses 19 November 2014, “Grup Media” < http://www.metrotvnews.com/aboutus/> diakses 19 November 2014 Grup Rajawali < http://www.rtv.co.id/info/aboutus> diakses 19 November 2014 “Company Profile KompasTV” < http://www.kompas.tv/front/profile/> diakses 26 November 2014. Mengapa Sistem TV berjaringan harus dijalankan?. <https://adearmando.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/mengapa-sistem-tv- berjaringan-harus-dijalankan/>, diakses 26 November 2014 122 “Akuisisi Indosiar Dinilai Melanggar UU Penyiaran” <http://www.republika.co.id/berita/breaking-news/ekonomi/11/03/23/171741- akuisisi-indosiar-dinilai-langgar-uu-penyiaran>, 03 Desember 2014 “CNN Indonesia Bakal Andalkan Jaringan TransMedia dan TV berlangganan” <http://www.the-marketeers.com/archives/CNN-Indonesia-Bakal- Andalkan-Jaringan-Trans-Media-dan-TV-Berlangganan%20.html>, 03 Desember 2014 “Mengapa Sistem TV berjaringan harus dijalankan?” <https://adearmando.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/mengapa-sistem-tv- berjaringan-harus-dijalankan/>, 03 Desember 2014 “Televisi Republik Indonesia” <http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Televisi_Republik_Indonesia>, diakses 03 Desember 2014 (Menuju Televisi Berjaringan oleh Muzayin Nazaruddin, staf pengajar Komunikasi Universitas Islam Indonesia, <http://communication.uii.ac.id/images/artikel/MENUJU%20TELEVISI% 20BERJARINGAN%20(1).pdf> diakses 18 Desember 2014. “Komersialisasi” <http://kbbi.web.id/komersialisasi>, diakses 07 Januari 2015. 123.
Recommended publications
  • Indonesia in View a CASBAA Market Research Report
    Indonesia in View A CASBAA Market Research Report In Association with Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 6 1.1 Large prospective market providing key challenges are overcome 6 1.2 Fiercely competitive pay TV environment 6 1.3 Slowing growth of paying subscribers 6 1.4 Nascent market for internet TV 7 1.5 Indonesian advertising dominated by ftA TV 7 1.6 Piracy 7 1.7 Regulations 8 2. FTA in Indonesia 9 2.1 National stations 9 2.2 Regional “network” stations 10 2.3 Local stations 10 2.4 FTA digitalization 10 3. The advertising market 11 3.1 Overview 11 3.2 Television 12 3.3 Other media 12 4. Pay TV Consumer Habits 13 4.1 Daily consumption of TV 13 4.2 What are consumers watching 13 4.3 Pay TV consumer psychology 16 5. Pay TV Environment 18 5.1 Overview 18 5.2 Number of players 18 5.3 Business models 20 5.4 Challenges facing the industry 21 5.4.1 Unhealthy competition between players and high churn rate 21 5.4.2 Rupiah depreciation against US dollar 21 5.4.3 Regulatory changes 21 5.4.4 Piracy 22 5.5 Subscribers 22 5.6 Market share 23 5.7 DTH is still king 23 5.8 Pricing 24 5.9 Programming 24 5.9.1 Premium channel mix 25 5.9.2 SD / HD channel mix 25 5.9.3 In-house / 3rd party exclusive channels 28 5.9.4 Football broadcast rights 32 5.9.5 International football rights 33 5.9.6 Indonesian Soccer League (ISL) 5.10 Technology 35 5.10.1 DTH operators’ satellite bands and conditional access system 35 5.10.2 Terrestrial technologies 36 5.10.3 Residential DTT services 36 5.10.4 In-car terrestrial service 36 5.11 Provincial cable operators 37 5.12 Players’ activities 39 5.12.1 Leading players 39 5.12.2 Other players 42 5.12.3 New entrants 44 5.12.4 Players exiting the sector 44 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Pt Mahaka Media Tbk. Dan Entitas Anak
    DAFTAR ISI 06 PROFIL PERSEROAN CORPORATE PROFILE Visi Misi & Filosofi 8 Vision Mission & Philosophy Sekilas Mahaka Media 10 Mahaka Media at a Glance Jejak Langkah Perseroan 14 Corporate Milestone Bidang Usaha 18 Line of Business Struktur Organisasi 20 Organization Structure Diagram Mahaka Media & Entitas Anak 2015 22 Mahaka Media Chart & Subsidiaries 2015 Struktur Kepemilikan Saham 24 06 Share Ownership Structure Kronologis Pencatatan Saham 25 Share Listing Chronology Kapitalisasi Pasar 25 Market Capitalization Komposisi Pemegang Saham 26 Shareholder Composition Informasi Harga Saham Dalam 2 (Dua) Tahun Terakhir 27 Stock Price Information The Last 2 (Two)Years Harga Saham 27 Quaterly Stock Price Ikhtisar Keuangan 28 Financial Highlights 2011-2015 34128 34 LAPORAN MANAJEMEN MANAGEMENT REPORT Sambutan Komisaris Utama 36 Foreword from The President Commissioner Dewan Komisaris 40 Board of Commissioners Laporan Direktur Utama 44 Report from The President Director Dewan Direksi 50 Board of The Directors 64 Kode Etik 54 Code of Ethics 1 Sumber Daya Manusia 58 Human Resources Data Karyawan 59 Employees Data Penghargaan & Sertfikasi 61 Award & Certification 64 TINJAUAN OPERASIONAL OPERATING REVIEW Prospek Usaha 2016 66 Business Prospect 2016 ii Mahaka Media Annual Report 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS KINERJA 2015 72 2015 PERFORMANCE PT Republika Media Mandiri (Harian Republika) 76 PT Pustaka Abdi Bangsa (Republika Penerbit) 80 PT Republika Media Visual (RMV) 86 PT Avabanindo Perkasa (Mahaka Advertising) 92 PT Media Golfindo (Golf Digest) 96 PT Metromakmur
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article (PDF)
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 136 2nd International Conference on Social and Political Development (ICOSOP 2017) The Power of the Screen: Releasing Oneself from the Influence of Capital Owners Puji Santoso Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara University (UMSU) Email: [email protected] Abstract— Indonesia’s Media has long played a pivotal role in every changing. The world’s dependence on political, economic, and cultural changes leads the media playing an active role in the change order. It is not uncommon that the media has always been considered as an effective means to control changes or the process of social transformation. In the current era of reformation, the press, especially television industry has been experiencing rapid development. This is triggered by the opportunities opened for capital owners to invest their money into media business of television. Furthermore, the entrepreneurs or the capital owners capitalize the benefits by establishing several media subsidiaries. They try to seize the freely opened opportunity to create journalistic works. The law stipulates that press freedom is a form of popular sovereignty based on the principles of democracy, justice, and legal sovereignty. The mandate of this law indicates that press freedom should reflect people’s sovereignty. The sovereign people are the people in power and have the power to potentially develop their life-force as much as possible. At present, Indonesia has over 15 national television stations, 12 of which are networked televisions, and no less than 250 local television stations. This number is projected to be increasing based on data on the number of lined up permit applicants registered at the Ministry of Communications and Information office (Kemenkominfo) or at the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission (KPI) office both at the central and regional levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking National Identity in an Age of Commercial Islam: the Television Industry, Religious Soap Operas, and Indonesian Youth
    Rethinking National Identity in an Age of Commercial Islam: The Television Industry, Religious Soap Operas, and Indonesian Youth by Inaya Rakhmani, S.Sos (UI), MA (UvA) This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Murdoch University 2013 I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary institution. ………………………………………….. Inaya Rakhmani ii ABSTRACT This thesis is about what it means to be Indonesian in an age of commercial Islam. It set out to understand the growing trend of “Islamisation” in Indonesian television after the end of the authoritarian New Order regime (1962 to 1998), which coincided with the rise of Islamic commodification in other sectors (Fealy, 2008). To achieve this, the thesis looks at the institutional practices, Islamic representation, and the reception of the most-watched television format with an Islamic theme, sinetron religi (religious drama). Studies on Indonesian television so far have focused on its structure, construct, and audience as separate entities (e.g. Sen & Hill, 2000; Kitley, 2000; Ida, 2006; Barkin, 2004; Loven, 2008). This thesis is the first research on Indonesian television that understands the institutional frameworks, identity constructs, and its reception as a whole. As the industry’s livelihood is determined by advertising revenue that relies on audience ratings, it is in the interest of the television stations to broadcast Islamic symbols that are acceptable to the general, “national” viewers. This study takes a look into the tension between Islamic ideologies and commercial interest in the practices that surround sinetron religi.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Thesis
    Master Thesis Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan Media Management Master Program Utilization of New Media by Traditional Media Companies in Indonesian Media Industry Charlie Tjokrodinata Degree project in: Media Management i Supervisor: Dr Christopher Rosenqvist - SSE ii Abstract – English The rise of social media represents a new challenge to the traditional media industry. Some traditional media companies either shy away on the idea of utilizing social media to enhance their services, but many others actually embrace this as an opportunity to reposition themselves within the industry. This study tries to figure out the extent of the proliferation of social media by the traditional players. The research approach focused on case study methodology through quantitative and qualitative methods. Record analysis of social media utilization by the traditional media companies represented the quantitative method. As many as 483 media companies from radio, television and printed media companies were sampled, they are companies under twelve national media conglomerates and one largest independent media group in Indonesia. Availability and a few simple statistics of web sites and three most popular social media platforms were recorded. The interviews with three different media companies and observations represented the qualitative method. The purpose is to understand the background motives of the social media utilization. The study reveals that utilization of web sites and social media platforms by the traditional media companies is quite extensive. The result revealed that 72% media companies have a web site, and more than 90% have Facebook accounts. Twitter, while not as popular as Facebook, still has as much as 73.6% of sampled media companies joining the platform.
    [Show full text]
  • Survei Indeks Kualitas Program Siaran Televisi Periode 5 Tahun 2016
    Survei Indeks Kualitas Program Siaran Televisi Periode 5 tahun 2016 1 2 Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia Survei Indeks Kualitas Program Siaran Televisi Periode 5 tahun 2016 3 4 Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia PENDAHULUAN PENDAHULUAN 1. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh posisi pengukuran rating yang sangat penting bagi televisi di Indonesia. 2. Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia (KPI) perlu data “rating” sendiri sesuai dengan misi, fungsi dan tugas KPI. 3. Salah satu fungsi KPI adalah melakukan pengawasan agar program siaran televisi makin baik dan berkualitas. 4. Data “rating” yang dibuat tersebut harus mencakup aspek kualitas siaran sehingga bisa menjadi bahan evaluasi bagi KPI dan stasiun televisi untuk memperbaiki mutu dan kualitas siaran televisi. TUJUAN 1. Mengevaluasi kualitas program siaran televisi berdasarkan kategori program siaran secara periodik 2. Menyusun pemeringkatan kualitas program siaran televisi berdasarkan kategori program siaran secara periodik URGENSI 1. Hasil penelitian diharapkan bisa diakses dan dimanfaatkan sebanyak mungkin stakeholder yang punya concern dengan program siaran televisi: perguruan tinggi, LSM, kelompok masyarakat sipil dsb. 2. Hasil penelitian diharapkan bisa menjadi fungsi pemberdayaan agar program acara televisi bisa lebih baik. Kegiatan ini lebih bersifat penilaian (assesment) terhadap program siaran televisi, dengan harapan stasiun televisi bisa melakukan pembenahan. Survei Indeks Kualitas Program Siaran Televisi Periode 53 tahun 2016 1 DESAIN RISET 1. Agar hasil riset dipakai, pelaku industri penyiaran dilibatkan dari awal. Kita tidak memposisikan industri penyiaran sebagai “objek evaluasi”. Sebaliknya, kita perlu mendengarkan apa kebutuhan mereka, keinginan mereka dan hambatan mereka terkait dengan data kepemirsaan televisi. Kebutuhan industri penyiaran ini juga harus dikaitkan fungsi KPI sebagai regulator da pemantau program acara televisi. 2. Dengan melibatkan pelaku industri sejak awal, hasil riset ini diharapkan akan lebih bisa diterima dan dijadikan acuan dalam menyusun program acara yang berkualitas.
    [Show full text]
  • INDONESIA ENERGY SUBSIDY BRIEFING a Bi-Monthly Review of Developments in Indonesian Energy Subsidy Policy and Energy Markets
    INDONESIA ENERGY SUBSIDY BRIEFING A bi-monthly review of developments in Indonesian energy subsidy policy and energy markets As part of its work on energy policy and sustainable development in April 2016 Indonesia, the Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI) of the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) publishes a regular briefing on issues related to energy subsidies. For more information, contact Lucky Lontoh at [email protected] and Lasse Toft at [email protected]. Highlights • On 30 March, the Indonesian government an- • The government is considering reforming nounced new prices of subsidized fuels to be diesel subsidies. A full removal of diesel subsi- applied from 1 April 2016. dies is anticipated to save IDR 16 trillion (USD 1.21 billion). • The price changes in April are the second round of price adjustments since the govern- • Coal companies are calling on the govern- ment announced in November 2015 that it ment to subsidize coal, but are being coun- would evaluate and adjust the price of subsi- tered by civil society organizations. dized fuel every three months. April Fuel Price Changes Table 1: Indonesian Subsidized Fuel Price Adjustments in April 2016 On 30 March, the Indonesian government announced Type of Subsi- Price January new prices of subsidized fuels to be applied from 1 Price April 2016 April 2016. This includes gasoline (RON 88) and auto- dized Fuel 2016 motive diesel (CN 48) which were both lowered by IDR Gasoline (RON 6,950 6,450 500 per litre (USD 0.04). The price of kerosene remains 88) – for regions (USD 0.52) (USD 0.49) the same at IDR 2500 per litre (USD 0.19) (Antara, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Laporan Akhir Analisis Dan Evaluasi Hukum Terkait Penyiaran
    LAPORAN AKHIR ANALISIS DAN EVALUASI HUKUM TERKAIT PENYIARAN BADAN PEMBINAAN HUKUM NASIONAL KEMENTERIAN HUKUM DAN HAM RI TAHUN 2020 Laporan Akhir Analisis dan Evaluasi Hukum Terkait Penyiaran Disusun oleh Pokja Analisis dan Evaluasi Hukum Terkait Penyiaran Penanggungjawab: Liestiarini Wulandari., S.H., M.H. di bawah pimpinan: Dr. Muhammad Riyanto, S.H., M.H. dengan anggota: Umri, S.Sos.,M.Si.; Drs. Jayanto Arus Adi,MM.; Apri Listiyanto, S.H.; Alice Angelica,S.H.,M.H.; Yuharningsih,S.H.; Iva Shofiya, S.H.,M.Si.; Dicky Mochammad Faisal, S.H.; Deasy Kamila,S.H.; Hendra Simak, S.H.; Jupiter Zalukhu,S.H. copyright© BADAN PEMBINAAN HUKUM NASIONAL KEMENTERIAN HUKUM DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA REPUBLIK INDONESIA Jl. Mayjend Soetoyo Nomor 10 - Cililitan, Jakarta Timur Telp : 62-21 8091908 (hunting), Faks : 62-21 8011753 Website: www.bphn.go.id Cetakan Pertama - Oktober 2020 ISBN : 978-623-7918-15-8 Hak Cipta dilindungi oleh Undang-Undang. Dilarang mengutip atau memperbanyak sebagian atau seluruh isi buku ini tanpa izin tertulis dari Pemegang Hak Cipta. Dicetak oleh: Percetakan Pohon Cahaya KATA SAMBUTAN KEPALA BADAN PEMBINAAN HUKUM NASIONAL Segala puji dan syukur kami panjatkan kepada Allah SWT atas segala limpahan rahmat, hidayah, karunia-Nya serta pengetahuan yang telah diberikan, sehingga Kelompok Kerja (Pokja) Analisis dan Evaluasi Hukum dapat menyelesaikan tahapan kegiatan melalui rapat-rapat Pokja, focus group discussion dan rapat dengan narasumber/pakar hingga menghasilkan laporan analisis dan evaluasi hukum yang dapat diselesaikan oleh Tim Kelompok Kerja (Pokja) di masa pandemi Covid-19 ini. Pusat Analisis dan Evaluasi Hukum Nasional, Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Kementerian Hukum dan HAM berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 29 Tahun 2015 tentang Struktur Organisasi Tata Kerja Kementerian Hukum dan HAM, melaksanakan salah satu tugas dan fungsi yaitu melakukan Analisis dan Evaluasi Hukum Nasional.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Stock of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia Deloitte Indonesia Business and Industry Updates
    Deloitte Indonesia Business and Industry Updates Taking stock of the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia Deloitte Indonesia Business and Industry Updates Taking stock of the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia More than nine months after the first Figure 1: Rolling 7-day average of daily confirmed COVID-19 cases in Indonesia confirmed COVID-19 case was reported in (March-December 2020) 1 Indonesia on 2 March 2020 , the world’s 7000 Indonesia fourth most populous country continues to grapple with the monumental task of 6000 controlling the outbreak, while keeping its 5000 economy running as smoothly and safely as 4000 possible. 3000 At this time of writing, Indonesia has 2000 experienced more than 840,000 confirmed COVID-19 cases and 24,500 deaths2, with 1000 a rolling 7-day average of about 7,000 daily 0 confirmed cases at the end of 2020 (see 2 Mar 2020 30 Apr 19 Jun 8 Aug 27 Sep 16 Nov 31 Dec 2020 Figure 1). Source: Our World in Data, 2020. This is an unprecedented time for the economy, and even as some level of optimism rebounds with the launch of Indonesia’s mass vaccination program on 13 January 20213, there remains a significant amount of uncertainty regarding the economy and its recovery prospects. Across the globe, the battle against COVID-19 continues. With the rollout of vaccination programs worldwide, it is perhaps timely to take stock of the pandemic’s impacts on several key industries in Indonesia’s economy, and the considerations that businesses will need to make as they look forward to a post- pandemic future.
    [Show full text]
  • Bab Ii Gambaran Umum Subjek Dan Objek
    BAB II GAMBARAN UMUM SUBJEK DAN OBJEK PENELITIAN A. Gambaran Umum Subjek Penelitian 1. Profil Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia (KPI) Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia (KPI) adalah sebuah lembaga independen di Indonesia yang kedudukannya setingkat dengan lembaga negara lainnya yang berfungsi sebagai regulator penyelenggaraan penyiaran di Indonesia. Komisi ini berdiri sejak tahun 2002 berdasarkan Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2002 Tentang Penyiaran dengan tujuan mengatur segala hal mengenai penyiaran di Indonesia. KPI terdiri atas Lembaga Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia Pusat (KPI Pusat) dan Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia Daerah (KPID) yang bekerja di wilayah setingkat Provinsi.Wewenang dan lingkup tugas Komisi Penyiaran meliputi pengaturan penyiaran yang diselenggarakan oleh Lembaga Penyiaran Publik, Lembaga Penyiaran Swasta, dan Lembaga Penyiaran Komunitas. KPI dan KPID sebagai lembaga perwujudan dan partisipasi masyarakat dalam penyiaran adalah mewadahi aspirasi dan mewakili kepentingan masyarakat akan penyiaran di Indonesia. Adapun yang dimaksud dengan Lembaga Negara Independen adalah Lembaga Negara yang dalam menjalankan tugas beserta fungsinya bebas dari tekanan maupun intervensi dari pihak manapun baik 45 itu campur tangan pemerintah itu sendiri, parpol, maupun pihak-pihak lainnya. Meskipun anggaran KPI/KPID berasal dari APBN/APBD tidak akan mengurangi independensi. Karena APBN/APBD berasal dari rakyat, milik rakyat, dan untuk rakyat, yang dihimpun pemerintah melalui pembayaran pajak, dan hasil pengelolaan kekayaan negara lain yang ditangani
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia's Effort to Enforce the Sovereign Right in the North Natuna Sea Amid the South China Sea Conflict
    International Journal of Arts and Social Science www.ijassjournal.com ISSN: 2581-7922, Volume 4 Issue 3, May-June 2021 Indonesia's Effort to Enforce the Sovereign Right in the North Natuna Sea amid the South China Sea Conflict Nour Zattullah1 1(Peace and Conflict Resolution Department, Indonesian Defense University, Indonesia) ABSTRACT: The conflict in the South China Sea is one of the conflicts in the ASEAN region. Indonesia's involvement in the South China Sea conflict began in 2012, when the People’s Republic of China (PRC) made absolute claims over the entire South China Sea territory. This absolute claim also includes the North Natuna Sea area which intersects with the PRC’s nine dash line claims. This paper attempts to elaborate on Indonesia's position in the conflict with the PRC in the North Natuna Sea using game theory and policies that have been and might be able to be implemented by Indonesia based on offense-defense theory and total defense doctrine. Indonesia is considered to have to avoid potential open conflicts that may occur with the PRC. Thus, it is considered that Indonesia should prioritize defensive action rather than offensive one. Policies in the form of increasing military presence and voicing rejection of the PRC's claims that have been applied so far are considered appropriate. However, alternative policies are needed to support the enforcement of Indonesia's sovereign rights in EEZ of the North Natuna Sea in the framework of total defense doctrine, among others, by increasing natural resource exploration in the North Natuna Sea and empowering fishermen there to maximize the presence of Indonesia in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT KODE ETIK CODE of ETHICS Atif
    ANNUAL REPORT KODE ETIK CODE OF ETHICS atif V NO Edukatif I T EA MW ORK K REDI RASA ANTUSIASME FOKUS TANGGUNG DAN B ilitas JAWAB AKTIF DAFTAR ISI TABLE OF CONTENTS PROFIL PERSEROAN KINERJA 2014 CORPORATE PROFILE 2014 PERFORMANCE Filosofi & Visi Misi 06 Tinjauan Umum 2014 58 Philosophy & Vision Mission 2014 General Review Sekilas Mahaka Media 08 Harian Republika 59 Mahaka Media at a Glance Republika Penerbit 60 04 Jejak Langkah Perseroan 10 Republika Media Visual 61 56 Corporate Milestone Mahaka Advertising 62 Bidang Usaha & Struktur Organisasi 13 Golf Digest 63 Line of Business & Organization Structure Parents Indonesia 64 Struktur Kepemilikan Saham 16 Shareholders Structure Jak TV 65 Komposisi Pemegang Saham 18 Gen FM 66 Shareholder Composition Jak FM 67 Kronologis Pencatatan Saham 20 Harian Indonesia 68 Share Listing Chronology Masima Radionet 69 Ikhtisar Keuangan 22 Alive Indonesia 70 Financial Highlights CardPlus 71 Informasi Anak Perusahaan 26 Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Corporate Subsidiaries Information 72 Corporate Social Responsibilities Kalender Kegiatan 2014 74 2014 Calendar Events LAPORAN MANAJEMEN MANAGEMENT REPORT Sambutan Komisaris Utama 31 ANALISA & KINERJA PERUSAHAAN Foreword from The President Commissioner ANALYSIS & PERFORMANCE OF THE Dewan Komisaris 34 COMPANY Board of Commissioner Laporan Ketua Direktur 38 Analisa & Kinerja Perusahaan 78 28 Analysis & Performance of the Company Report from The President Director Dewan Direksi 42 Analisa Arus Kas 82 Board of The Directors Cashflow Analysis 76 Jumlah Karyawan &
    [Show full text]