DOCSLIB.ORG

Analyzing Glacier Surface Motion Using Lidar Data

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analyzing Glacier Surface Motion Using Lidar Data Portland State University PDXScholar Geology Faculty Publications and Presentations Geology 3-17-2017 Analyzing Glacier Surface Motion Using LiDAR Data Jennifer W. Tellig University of Houston Craig Glennie University of Houston Andrew G. Fountain Portland State University, [email protected] David C. Finnegan Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory Remote Sensing/GIS Center of Excellence Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/geology_fac Part of the Geology Commons, and the Glaciology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Telling, J. W., Glennie, C., Fountain, A. G., & Finnegan, D. C. (2017). Analyzing Glacier Surface Motion Using LiDAR Data. Remote Sensing, 9(3), 1-12. doi:10.3390/rs9030283 This Article is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. remote sensing Article Analyzing Glacier Surface Motion Using LiDAR Data Jennifer W. Telling 1,*, Craig Glennie 1, Andrew G. Fountain 2 and David C. Finnegan 3 1 National Center for Airborne Laser Mapping, University of Houston, 5000 Gulf Freeway, Building 4, Room 216, Houston, TX 77204-5059, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Geology, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207-0751, USA; [email protected] 3 U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory Remote Sensing/GIS Center of Excellence, ATTN: CEERD-PA-H, 72 Lyme Road, Hanover, NH 03755-1290, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-201-835-8478 Academic Editors: Guoqing Zhou, Xiaofeng Li and Prasad S. Thenkabail Received: 31 January 2017; Accepted: 14 March 2017; Published: 17 March 2017 Abstract: Understanding glacier motion is key to understanding how glaciers are growing, shrinking, and responding to changing environmental conditions. In situ observations are often difficult to collect and offer an analysis of glacier surface motion only at a few discrete points. Using light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data collected from surveys over six glaciers in Greenland and Antarctica, particle image velocimetry (PIV) was applied to temporally-spaced point clouds to detect and measure surface motion. The type and distribution of surface features, surface roughness, and spatial and temporal resolution of the data were all found to be important factors, which limited the use of PIV to four of the original six glaciers. The PIV results were found to be in good agreement with other, widely accepted, measurement techniques, including manual tracking and GPS, and offered a comprehensive distribution of velocity data points across glacier surfaces. For three glaciers in Taylor Valley, Antarctica, average velocities ranged from 0.8–2.1 m/year. For one glacier in Greenland, the average velocity was 22.1 m/day (8067 m/year). Keywords: terrestrial laser scanning; airborne laser scanning; LiDAR; morphology; glacier surface velocity 1. Introduction Glaciers are dynamic and in constant flux, and understanding glacial motion provides important information about their growth and retreat [1]. However, the size and extent of glaciers, along with challenging environmental conditions, can severely limit data collection in the field or, in particularly hazardous conditions, field work may be precluded entirely [2–4]. As remote sensing data becomes more widely available, it is becoming a primary data collection technique in the cryosphere, particularly in areas that are inaccessible to traditional field methods [2]. Traditional methods of collecting glacier velocity data rely on stakes drilled into the ice and/or GPS deployed on the glacier surface [5–8]. The optical and geodetic surveys require little post-processing but only provide data at discrete points, usually covering a fraction of the entire glacier. Remote sensing techniques, including synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and multispectral imagery, are increasingly being used to detect and monitor changes in the cryosphere [4,9–12]. In difficult to reach areas of the Himalayas, SAR has been used to measure flow velocities at the Kangshung and Khumbu Glaciers [11]. SAR was also used to measure flow velocities at the Shirase Glacier, Antarctica, and at Helheim Glacier, in Greenland [9,10,12]. Often, these methods rely on satellite based platforms, which offer regular, long duration coverage, but they can be inhibited by severe topography and viewing Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 283; doi:10.3390/rs9030283 www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 283 2 of 12 Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 283 2 of 13 offerangle regular, [11,12]. Inlong addition, duration SAR coverage, tends to but have they low ca backscatteringn be inhibited intensity by severe over topography dry snow, and reducing viewing the volumeangle [11,12]. of data In collected addition, in SAR some tends environments to have low [11 backscattering,12]. intensity over dry snow, reducing the volumeTerrestrial of data and collected airborne laserin some scanning environments (TLS and [11,12]. ALS, respectively) are two active remote sensing techniquesTerrestrial that useand lightairborne detection laser and scanning ranging (TLS (LiDAR), and ALS, typically respectively) in the near-infrared are two active wavelengths, remote sensingto provide techniques precise 3Dthat elevation use light models detection of surfaces. and ranging TLS and(LiDAR), ALS have typically both beenin the used near-infrared to survey wavelengths,glaciers to create to provide highly precise detailed 3D digital elevation elevation model modelss of surfaces. (DEMs) TLS for and the ALS purpose have ofboth determining been used tointerannual survey glaciers variability to create in surface highly elevation detailed in di ordergital toelevation estimate models mass balance (DEMs) or for long-term the purpose volume of determiningchange [2,3,13 interannual,14]. variability in surface elevation in order to estimate mass balance or long- term Involume this study, change we [2,3,13,14]. use LiDAR DEMs, collected over time, to calculate glacier surface velocity using two differentIn this study, methods—particle we use LiDAR DEMs, image collected velocimetry over (PIV) time, andto calculate manual glacier tracking. surface Applying velocity PIV, using an twoimage different processing methods—particle technique [15–18 image], to LiDAR velocimetry data provides (PIV) and an opportunity manual tracking. to measure Applying velocity PIV, across an imageentire glaciersprocessing rapidly technique and the [15–18], ability to measureLiDAR data high provides resolution an nuances opportunity in the to flow measure field thatvelocity may acrossbe missed entire using glaciers other rapidly techniques. and the When ability compared to measure to other high methodsresolution such nuances as feature in the extraction, flow field that and mayother be image missed correlation using other techniques, techniques. PIV When offers compar an approached to other that methods is sensitive such to as small feature scale, extraction, locally variableand other changes. image correlation This is especially techniques, important PIV offers on glacier an approach surfaces that where is sensitive common to features small scale, may deformlocally variableslightly betweenchanges. the This collection is especially of repeat important data. Successful on glacier application surfaces of where this method common will features make another may deformtechnique slightly available between for assessing the collection velocity of ofrepeat glaciers data. and Successful other slow application moving landforms. of this method The PIV will results make anotherare compared technique to manual available tracking for assessing results and, velocity where of available,glaciers and in situother data. slow The moving new method landforms. is tested The PIVon ALS results and are TLS compared point clouds to ofmanual six glaciers tracking in Antarcticaresults and, and where Greenland, available, with in data situ covering data. The a range new methodof spatial is andtested temporal on ALS resolutions. and TLS point clouds of six glaciers in Antarctica and Greenland, with data covering a range of spatial and temporal resolutions. 2. Study Sites 2. Study Sites The horizontal surface motion for six glaciers—five from Taylor Valley, Antarctica (Canada, Commonwealth,The horizontal Rhone, surface Suess, motion Taylor) for and six one glaciers—five from Greenland from (Helheim)—was Taylor Valley, analyzedAntarctica in the(Canada, study. TaylorCommonwealth, Valley (Figure Rhone,1) is oneSuess, of theTaylor) McMurdo and one Dry from Valleys Greenland (MDV) located(Helheim)—was in East Antarctica analyzed (77.5 in the◦S, 163study.◦E). Taylor The valley Valley landscape (Figure 1) is composedis one of the of McMurdo sandy, gravelly Dry Valleys valleybottoms (MDV) located with expanses in East ofAntarctica exposed (77.5°S,bedrock 163°E). and is populatedThe valley withlandscape perennially is composed ice-covered of sandy, lakes gravelly and ephemeral valley bo streamsttoms with originating expanses from of exposedglaciers thatbedrock flow intoand theis populated valleys from with the surroundingperennially ice-covered mountains [lakes19]. Air and temperatures ephemeral averagestreams originatingabout −17 ◦ Cfrom and glaciers summer that temperatures flow
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Calving Processes and the Dynamics of Calving Glaciers ⁎ Douglas I
    Earth-Science Reviews 82 (2007) 143–179 www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Calving processes and the dynamics of calving glaciers ⁎ Douglas I. Benn a,b, , Charles R. Warren a, Ruth H. Mottram a a School of Geography and Geosciences, University of St Andrews, KY16 9AL, UK b The University Centre in Svalbard, PO Box 156, N-9171 Longyearbyen, Norway Received 26 October 2006; accepted 13 February 2007 Available online 27 February 2007 Abstract Calving of icebergs is an important component of mass loss from the polar ice sheets and glaciers in many parts of the world. Calving rates can increase dramatically in response to increases in velocity and/or retreat of the glacier margin, with important implications for sea level change. Despite their importance, calving and related dynamic processes are poorly represented in the current generation of ice sheet models. This is largely because understanding the ‘calving problem’ involves several other long-standing problems in glaciology, combined with the difficulties and dangers of field data collection. In this paper, we systematically review different aspects of the calving problem, and outline a new framework for representing calving processes in ice sheet models. We define a hierarchy of calving processes, to distinguish those that exert a fundamental control on the position of the ice margin from more localised processes responsible for individual calving events. The first-order control on calving is the strain rate arising from spatial variations in velocity (particularly sliding speed), which determines the location and depth of surface crevasses. Superimposed on this first-order process are second-order processes that can further erode the ice margin.
    [Show full text]
  • LESSON PLAN #2: Creating the Driftless: a Study in Glacial Movement
    LESSON PLAN #2: Creating the Driftless: A Study in Glacial Movement Overview: Glaciers are moving mountains of ice. They move like slow rivers and actually flow. Gravity and the sheer weight of the ice mass are the causes of glacial motion. Ice is softer than rock so is easily deformed by the pressure of its own weight. Movement at the underside of a glacier is slower than movement along the top. Glaciers retreat and advance, depending on snow accumulation, evaporation, or ice melt. Glaciers transport materials as they move. They also sculpt and carve the land beneath them. A glacier’s weight combined with gradual movement, reshapes the land over hundreds to thousands of years. The ice erodes the land surface and carries broken rock and soil debris far from their original places, resulting in some interesting glacial landforms. Due to the nature of land formations, some areas in northwest Illinois along with southwest Wisconsin, southeast Minnesota, and northeast Iowa were missed by the four glaciers that at different times covered the rest of these states. This area not covered by glaciers and the resulting glacial drift is called “The Driftless Area.” This Driftless Area is rich with historic and geological information free from glacial impact. Duration: 30 minutes Subject Areas: Earth Science, Physical Science, Geography Standards Addressed: 4-PS3-1 4-PS3-4 5-ESS3-1 MS-ESS3-1 MS-ESS2-5 MS-ESS2-3 MS-ESS1-C MS-PS2-4 Objectives: Gain an understanding of how glaciers move Understand the types of landforms created from glacial movement and glacial scraping Define what is meant by The Driftless Area Teacher Background: Glaciers are made up of fallen snow that, over many years, compresses into large, thickened ice masses.
    [Show full text]
  • A Globally Complete Inventory of Glaciers
    Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 60, No. 221, 2014 doi: 10.3189/2014JoG13J176 537 The Randolph Glacier Inventory: a globally complete inventory of glaciers W. Tad PFEFFER,1 Anthony A. ARENDT,2 Andrew BLISS,2 Tobias BOLCH,3,4 J. Graham COGLEY,5 Alex S. GARDNER,6 Jon-Ove HAGEN,7 Regine HOCK,2,8 Georg KASER,9 Christian KIENHOLZ,2 Evan S. MILES,10 Geir MOHOLDT,11 Nico MOÈ LG,3 Frank PAUL,3 Valentina RADICÂ ,12 Philipp RASTNER,3 Bruce H. RAUP,13 Justin RICH,2 Martin J. SHARP,14 THE RANDOLPH CONSORTIUM15 1Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA 2Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA 3Department of Geography, University of ZuÈrich, ZuÈrich, Switzerland 4Institute for Cartography, Technische UniversitaÈt Dresden, Dresden, Germany 5Department of Geography, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada E-mail: [email protected] 6Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA 7Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway 8Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden 9Institute of Meteorology and Geophysics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria 10Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK 11Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA 12Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 13National Snow and Ice Data Center, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA 14Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 15A complete list of Consortium authors is in the Appendix ABSTRACT. The Randolph Glacier Inventory (RGI) is a globally complete collection of digital outlines of glaciers, excluding the ice sheets, developed to meet the needs of the Fifth Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for estimates of past and future mass balance.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaciers and Their Significance for the Earth Nature - Vladimir M
    HYDROLOGICAL CYCLE – Vol. IV - Glaciers and Their Significance for the Earth Nature - Vladimir M. Kotlyakov GLACIERS AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE EARTH NATURE Vladimir M. Kotlyakov Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia Keywords: Chionosphere, cryosphere, glacial epochs, glacier, glacier-derived runoff, glacier oscillations, glacio-climatic indices, glaciology, glaciosphere, ice, ice formation zones, snow line, theory of glaciation Contents 1. Introduction 2. Development of glaciology 3. Ice as a natural substance 4. Snow and ice in the Nature system of the Earth 5. Snow line and glaciers 6. Regime of surface processes 7. Regime of internal processes 8. Runoff from glaciers 9. Potentialities for the glacier resource use 10. Interaction between glaciation and climate 11. Glacier oscillations 12. Past glaciation of the Earth Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary Past, present and future of glaciation are a major focus of interest for glaciology, i.e. the science of the natural systems, whose properties and dynamics are determined by glacial ice. Glaciology is the science at the interfaces between geography, hydrology, geology, and geophysics. Not only glaciers and ice sheets are its subjects, but also are atmospheric ice, snow cover, ice of water basins and streams, underground ice and aufeises (naleds). Ice is a mono-mineral rock. Ten crystal ice variants and one amorphous variety of the ice are known.UNESCO Only the ice-1 variant has been – reve EOLSSaled in the Nature. A cryosphere is formed in the region of interaction between the atmosphere, hydrosphere and lithosphere, and it is characterized bySAMPLE negative or zero temperature. CHAPTERS Glaciology itself studies the glaciosphere that is a totality of snow-ice formations on the Earth's surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Edges of Ice-Sheet Glaciology
    Important Things Ice Sheets Do, but Ice Sheet Models Don’t Dr. Robert Bindschadler Chief Scientist Hydrospheric and Biospheric Sciences Laboratory NASA Goddard Space Flight Center [email protected] I’ll talk about • Why we need models – from a non-modeler • Why we need good models – recent observations have destroyed confidence in present models • Recent ice-sheet surprises • Responsible physical processes “…understanding of (possible future rapid dynamical changes in ice flow) is too limited to assess their likelihood or provide a best estimate or an upper bound for sea level rise.” IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Summary for Policy Makers (2007) Future Sea Level is likely underestimated A1B IPCC AR4 (2007) Ice Sheets matter Globally Source: CReSIS and NASA Land area lost by 1-meter rise in sea level Impact of 1-meter sea level rise: Source: Anthoff et al., 2006 Maldives 20th Century Greenland Ice Sheet Sea level Change (mm/a) -1 0 +1 accumulation 450 Gt/a melting 225 Gt/a ice flow 225 Gt/a Approximately in “mass balance” 21st Century Greenland Ice Sheet Sea level Change (mm/a) -1 0 +1 accumulation melting ice flow Things could get a little better or a lot worse Increased ice flow will dominate the future rate of change A History Lesson • Less ice in HIGH SEA LEVEL Less warmer ice climates • Ice sheets More shrink faster LOW ice than they TEMPERATURE WARM grow • Sea level change is not COLD THEN NOW smooth Time Decreasing Mass Balance (Source: Luthcke et al., unpub.) Greenland Ice Sheet Mass Balance GREENLAND (Source: IPCC FAR) Antarctic Ice Sheet Mass Balance ANTARCTICA (Source: IPCC FAR) Pace of ice sheet changes have astonished experts is the common agent behind these changes Ice sheets HATE water! Fastest Flow at the Edges Interior: 1000’s meters thick and slow Perimeter: 100’s meters thick and fast Source: Rignot and Thomas Response time and speed of perturbation propagation are tied directly to ice flow speed 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ilulissat Icefjord
    World Heritage Scanned Nomination File Name: 1149.pdf UNESCO Region: EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA __________________________________________________________________________________________________ SITE NAME: Ilulissat Icefjord DATE OF INSCRIPTION: 7th July 2004 STATE PARTY: DENMARK CRITERIA: N (i) (iii) DECISION OF THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE: Excerpt from the Report of the 28th Session of the World Heritage Committee Criterion (i): The Ilulissat Icefjord is an outstanding example of a stage in the Earth’s history: the last ice age of the Quaternary Period. The ice-stream is one of the fastest (19m per day) and most active in the world. Its annual calving of over 35 cu. km of ice accounts for 10% of the production of all Greenland calf ice, more than any other glacier outside Antarctica. The glacier has been the object of scientific attention for 250 years and, along with its relative ease of accessibility, has significantly added to the understanding of ice-cap glaciology, climate change and related geomorphic processes. Criterion (iii): The combination of a huge ice sheet and a fast moving glacial ice-stream calving into a fjord covered by icebergs is a phenomenon only seen in Greenland and Antarctica. Ilulissat offers both scientists and visitors easy access for close view of the calving glacier front as it cascades down from the ice sheet and into the ice-choked fjord. The wild and highly scenic combination of rock, ice and sea, along with the dramatic sounds produced by the moving ice, combine to present a memorable natural spectacle. BRIEF DESCRIPTIONS Located on the west coast of Greenland, 250-km north of the Arctic Circle, Greenland’s Ilulissat Icefjord (40,240-ha) is the sea mouth of Sermeq Kujalleq, one of the few glaciers through which the Greenland ice cap reaches the sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Gradient Approach to INSAR Modelling of Glacial Dynamics and Morphology
    Gradient approach to INSAR modelling of glacial dynamics and morphology A. I. Sharov Institute of Digital Image Processing, Joanneum Research, Wastiangasse 6, A - 8010 Graz, Austria E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: differential interferometry, phase gradient, change detection, glacier velocity, geodetic survey ABSTRACT: This paper describes the development and testing of an original gradient approach (GINSAR) to the reconstruction of glacial morphology and ice motion estimation from the interferometric phase gradient that does not involve the procedure of interferometric phase unwrapping, thus excluding areal error propagation and improving the modelling accuracy. The global and stringent GINSAR algorithm is applicable to unsupervised glacier change detection, ice motion estimation and glacier mass balance measurement at regional scale. Experimental studies and field surveys proved its efficacy and robustness. Some algorithmic singularities and limitations are discussed. 1 INTRODUCTION detect and to measure quite small glacier motions and ice deformations in the centimetre range from There is a close interrelation between glacier motion spaceborne SAR interferograms with a nominal and glacial topography. Irregularities in the glacier ground resolution of several tens of meters. Accurate width, thickness, slope or direction alter the reconstruction of the configuration and external character of ice flow. On the other hand, glacial structure of the glacier surface from INSAR data is topography is dynamically supported by the moving also possible. Differential interferometry (DINSAR) ice (Fatland & Lingle 1998). Both, glacier dynamic based on differencing between two different SAR quantities and topographic variables are essential interferograms of the same glacier allows the parameters for studying the glacier mass balance and impacts of glacial topography and surface monitoring actual and potential glacier changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacial Processes and Landforms
    Glacial Processes and Landforms I. INTRODUCTION A. Definitions 1. Glacier- a thick mass of flowing/moving ice a. glaciers originate on land from the compaction and recrystallization of snow, thus are generated in areas favored by a climate in which seasonal snow accumulation is greater than seasonal melting (1) polar regions (2) high altitude/mountainous regions 2. Snowfield- a region that displays a net annual accumulation of snow a. snowline- imaginary line defining the limits of snow accumulation in a snowfield. (1) above which continuous, positive snow cover 3. Water balance- in general the hydrologic cycle involves water evaporated from sea, carried to land, precipitation, water carried back to sea via rivers and underground a. water becomes locked up or frozen in glaciers, thus temporarily removed from the hydrologic cycle (1) thus in times of great accumulation of glacial ice, sea level would tend to be lower than in times of no glacial ice. II. FORMATION OF GLACIAL ICE A. Process: Formation of glacial ice: snow crystallizes from atmospheric moisture, accumulates on surface of earth. As snow is accumulated, snow crystals become compacted > in density, with air forced out of pack. 1. Snow accumulates seasonally: delicate frozen crystal structure a. Low density: ~0.1 gm/cu. cm b. Transformation: snow compaction, pressure solution of flakes, percolation of meltwater c. Freezing and recrystallization > density 2. Firn- compacted snow with D = 0.5D water a. With further compaction, D >, firn ---------ice. b. Crystal fabrics oriented and aligned under weight of compaction 3. Ice: compacted firn with density approaching 1 gm/cu. cm a.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacier Movement
    ISSN 2047-0371 Glacier Movement C. Scott Watson1 and Duncan Quincey1 1 School of Geography and water@leeds, University of Leeds ([email protected]) ABSTRACT: Quantification of glacier movement can supplement measurements of surface elevation change to allow an integrated assessment of glacier mass balance. Glacier velocity is also closely linked to the surface morphology of both clean-ice and debris-covered glaciers. Velocity applications include distinguishing active from inactive ice on debris-covered glaciers, identifying glacier surge events, or inferring basal conditions using seasonal observations. Surface displacements can be surveyed manually in the field using trigonometric principles and a total station or theodolite for example, or dGPS measurements, which allow horizontal and vertical movement to be quantified for accessible areas. Semi-automated remote sensing techniques such as feature tracking (using optical or radar imagery) and interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) (using radar imagery), can provide spatially distributed and multi-temporal velocity fields of horizontal glacier surface displacement. Remote-sensing techniques are more practical and can provide a greater distribution of measurements over larger spatial scales. Time-lapse imagery can also be exploited to track surface displacements, providing fine temporal and spatial resolution, although the latter is dependent upon the range between camera and glacier surface. This chapter outlines the costs, benefits, and methodological considerations
    [Show full text]
  • Glacial Geomorphology☆ John Menzies, Brock University, St
    Glacial Geomorphology☆ John Menzies, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This is an update of H. French and J. Harbor, 8.1 The Development and History of Glacial and Periglacial Geomorphology, In Treatise on Geomorphology, edited by John F. Shroder, Academic Press, San Diego, 2013. Introduction 1 Glacial Landscapes 3 Advances and Paradigm Shifts 3 Glacial Erosion—Processes 7 Glacial Transport—Processes 10 Glacial Deposition—Processes 10 “Linkages” Within Glacial Geomorphology 10 Future Prospects 11 References 11 Further Reading 16 Introduction The scientific study of glacial processes and landforms formed in front of, beneath and along the margins of valley glaciers, ice sheets and other ice masses on the Earth’s surface, both on land and in ocean basins, constitutes glacial geomorphology. The processes include understanding how ice masses move, erode, transport and deposit sediment. The landforms, developed and shaped by glaciation, supply topographic, morphologic and sedimentologic knowledge regarding these glacial processes. Likewise, glacial geomorphology studies all aspects of the mapped and interpreted effects of glaciation both modern and past on the Earth’s landscapes. The influence of glaciations is only too visible in those landscapes of the world only recently glaciated in the recent past and during the Quaternary. The impact on people living and working in those once glaciated environments is enormous in terms, for example, of groundwater resources, building materials and agriculture. The cities of Glasgow and Boston, their distinctive street patterns and numerable small hills (drumlins) attest to the effect of Quaternary glaciations on urban development and planning. It is problematic to precisely determine when the concept of glaciation first developed.
    [Show full text]
  • 66 Journal of Glaciology the Formation of Fjords Many
    66 JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY THE FORMATION OF FJORDS By RENE KOECHLIN (Blonay, Switzerland) MANY explanations of the origin of fjords are to be found in works on geography and geology as well as in guide books, but none of them seems fully to meet the case. Fjords are the natural result of the laws which govern the movement of glaciers; they are formed by erosion of the beds of glaciers as they flow into the sea and in the course of centuries become displaced inland. For a further account the reader is referred to my two papers on the theory of glacier mechanism. *f The Laws of Glacier Movement. Just as liquid precipitation in temperate countries follows its course to the ocean under the impulse of gravity, so does the solid precipitation transformed by compression into ice in Polar regions make its way seawards, eroding its bed as it flows and excavating a rock channel. The erosion is slight in the accumulation areas, but increases greatly at lower levels where I have calculated that it is of the order of i cm. a year, as opposed to no more than o-2 to i-o mm. a year for the whole glacier system; the latter figures have been established by the measurement of the amount of solid material found in the streams issuing from glaciers. Erosion takes place uniformly throughout the'bed of the ice stream, so that the glacier gradually sinks into the ground parallel to the surface. At the same time it cuts its way headward (see Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaciers and Glaciation
    M18_TARB6927_09_SE_C18.QXD 1/16/07 4:41 PM Page 482 M18_TARB6927_09_SE_C18.QXD 1/16/07 4:41 PM Page 483 Glaciers and Glaciation CHAPTER 18 A small boat nears the seaward margin of an Antarctic glacier. (Photo by Sergio Pitamitz/ CORBIS) 483 M18_TARB6927_09_SE_C18.QXD 1/16/07 4:41 PM Page 484 limate has a strong influence on the nature and intensity of Earth’s external processes. This fact is dramatically illustrated in this chapter because the C existence and extent of glaciers is largely controlled by Earth’s changing climate. Like the running water and groundwater that were the focus of the preceding two chap- ters, glaciers represent a significant erosional process. These moving masses of ice are re- sponsible for creating many unique landforms and are part of an important link in the rock cycle in which the products of weathering are transported and deposited as sediment. Today glaciers cover nearly 10 percent of Earth’s land surface; however, in the recent ge- ologic past, ice sheets were three times more extensive, covering vast areas with ice thou- sands of meters thick. Many regions still bear the mark of these glaciers (Figure 18.1). The basic character of such diverse places as the Alps, Cape Cod, and Yosemite Valley was fashioned by now vanished masses of glacial ice. Moreover, Long Island, the Great Lakes, and the fiords of Norway and Alaska all owe their existence to glaciers. Glaciers, of course, are not just a phenomenon of the geologic past. As you will see, they are still sculpting and depositing debris in many regions today.
    [Show full text]