Understanding Violent Conflict: a Comparative Study Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Understanding Violent Conflict: a Comparative Study Of UNDERSTANDING VIOLENT CONFLICT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TAJIKISTAN AND UZBEKISTAN Idil Tuncer Kilavuz Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Central Eurasian Studies, Indiana University August 2007 UMI Number: 3278200 Copyright 2007 by Tuncer Kilavuz, Idil All rights reserved. UMI Microform 3278200 Copyright 2007 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. __________________________ William Fierman, Ph.D. __________________________ Gardner Bovington Doctoral Committee __________________________ Henry E. Hale __________________________ Nazif Shahrani April 16, 2007 ii © 2007 Idil Tuncer Kilavuz ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I have to thank a lot of people for the help, support and encouragement that they gave so generously during the planning, research, and writing stages of this project—both during my studies in Turkey and the United States, and during my field research in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Since these amount to hundreds of people altogether, I unfortunately cannot name everyone. Also now, at the end of a difficult and hectic process of dissertation-writing, I am afraid that I will probably forget someone that I should have named. In any case I am, and always will be, truly grateful for their help. I would like to start by thanking my professors in the Political Science Department of Marmara University, which I entered as an undergraduate, and in which I am proud (and fortunate) to now teach as a lecturer. First, Gunay Goksu Ozdogan gave me invaluable guidance during my studies there. I received from her my initial education on how to do research: how to ask questions, look for answers, and write papers. Her encouragement and support while I was away from home was very touching. Busra Ersanli’s marvelous classes on Central Asia, together with the passion and generosity with which she shares her knowledge, inspired my interest in the region. She too was very supportive and encouraging throughout my undergraduate and graduate years. I owe special thanks to Ayhan Aktar, who encouraged me to pursue a Ph.D. in the US. I am grateful to him for his support and confidence in me and my work, which I would never have attempted without his encouragement. Sule Kut and Gencer Ozcan, outstanding former members of the Marmara University faculty, also inspired me during my studies. I learned a lot from all these professors. They were true mentors as well as friends, and I am thoroughly grateful to them. They inspired me to teach. I will be happy if I can be half as good a teacher and researcher. Also I would like to thank my friend and colleague Erhan Dogan for all his encouragement. When I had doubts as to whether I would ever be able to finish this project, he believed in me, and made me believe in myself. iv I was very fortunate in having wonderful professors in the US as well. First, I’d like to thank the chair of my dissertation committee, William Fierman. He served as my advisor throughout my graduate studies at Indiana University, and was always there to help. He was very generous in sharing his knowledge of Central Asia and its people. His support during my research in Uzbekistan was extremely significant. He carefully read these chapters, and his invaluable comments helped me to clarify my arguments. He provided wonderful editorial support as well. Without him, this project would have been impossible. I am also grateful to Nazif Shahrani. I learned a lot from him during my graduate studies at IU, and his comments greatly benefited this dissertation. He taught me to pay attention to empirical details, to carefully listen to and report what people say, and (most importantly) to constantly ask questions and pursue answers. The input of Henry Hale during my graduate studies, and during this project, was enormous. He taught me to think in terms of scientific puzzles, and ways to solve them. He always reminded me to think about the broader theoretical implications of this project. I am grateful to Gardner Bovington for serving on my committee. His invaluable insights, comments, and ideas helped this dissertation a lot. During my field research in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, I greatly benefited from the contributions of many people in the region. It is very unfortunate that I cannot name them, but I am sure they understand that I acknowledge them and their support. It is no exaggeration to say that without their help, this dissertation would have been very different, and perhaps would not have been written at all. I owe many thanks to friends and colleagues in various universities, institutes and research centers in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. They had long discussions with me about their countries; helped me to better understand the politics and society of the region; helped me arrange interviews with political leaders; hosted me in their homes (and made me feel at home); helped me during my journeys, and through various difficulties in the field; showed concern for me when I was late in returning from an v interview, or visiting a place they considered dangerous; and also fed me with delicious Central Asian meals. I miss them and their countries, and would like to go back again very much. I consider them my families in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, and will always be indebted to them. I am also grateful to all those who assisted me in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan—for example by helping me arrange interviews, or traveling with me to difficult, distant regions of their countries. My fellow IU graduate students Halim Kara and Yilmaz Bingol (now teaching at different universities in Turkey) are wonderful friends and brilliant colleagues that anyone would be blessed to have. I am grateful to them for their friendship, support, encouragement and academic inspiration. I am grateful to another IU graduate student, David Bell, for his friendship in Bloomington, and for helping to edit this dissertation. Thanks also to Emily Kara for being such a good friend, and for supporting me during the dissertation-writing stage. She too helped edit this dissertation, for which I owe her special thanks. This dissertation was in a very different shape before Emily and David contributed their superb editorial skills. Micah Aki, another IU graduate student, was a great friend and great companion to have in Bloomington. I am grateful to many other people whom I met in Bloomington, and who became lifelong friends. Kadir Cakmak and Erica Vagedes are truly the most wonderful friends that one can have. Their support, encouragement, and friendship were outstanding during my stay in Bloomington. I consider myself very lucky to have met Tuba and Tohan Hazinedar and Gunsel Bingol during my studies in Indiana University. Whenever my studies became too stressful, Tuba’s cheerful personality would remind me of the joyful side of the world. Tohan was always there to help when I needed, and I am thankful to Gunsel for her friendship and generous nature. vi It was great to have the company of brilliant and enthusiastic colleagues in the field. I was very lucky to meet Ebru Erdem in Tashkent. I am also grateful to my friend Thomas Welsford, a fellow graduate student in IU who was also in Tashkent during my fieldwork there. Looking back on our discussions of our projects and difficulties, I greatly enjoyed the cheerful conversations that we had together. They were great companions and great friends. I would also like to thank April Younger, Indiana University’s CEUS Department Secretary, who was great at supporting me in technical and administrative matters. She was always there to help me, and always had solutions and answers to my questions. Special thanks go to my husband, Mehmet Kilavuz, who was very supportive during my graduate studies in Indiana University, and during the dissertation-writing process. I am grateful to him for his love, trust, and encouragement, and for being such a good husband. Mehmet was truly great during the ups and downs of this project. I also want to thank our son, Mustafa Mert (who was born during the writing stage), for being the great little guy that he is. If not for their patience and understanding, I know that it would have been much, much harder to finish this project. Finally I would like to thank my parents, Sema and Aygun Tuncer, for their constant love, support, and confidence. They helped me in every way possible during life, and encouraged my studies—all the way from primary school, to this last step of the education ladder. At last I understand that raising a child is the most difficult undertaking in the world. I hope I can be as good as a parent to my child as they were to me. I dedicate this dissertation to them. Idil Tuncer Kilavuz Bloomington, Indiana, April 2007 vii Idil Tuncer Kilavuz UNDERSTANDING VIOLENT CONFLICT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TAJIKISTAN AND UZBEKISTAN This dissertation asks how we can explain the occurrence of civil war in Tajikistan and, contrary to what the theories and explanations of violent conflict in the literature lead us to expect, its absence in Uzbekistan. The factors cited in the literature on violent conflict in general and on the Tajikistan civil war in particular as the causes of violent conflict were present both in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, nevertheless only the latter experienced civil war.
Recommended publications
  • The University of Chicago Old Elites Under Communism: Soviet Rule in Leninobod a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Di
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO OLD ELITES UNDER COMMUNISM: SOVIET RULE IN LENINOBOD A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY FLORA J. ROBERTS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS JUNE 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures .................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ vi A Note on Transliteration .................................................................................................. ix Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter One. Noble Allies of the Revolution: Classroom to Battleground (1916-1922) . 43 Chapter Two. Class Warfare: the Old Boi Network Challenged (1925-1930) ............... 105 Chapter Three. The Culture of Cotton Farms (1930s-1960s) ......................................... 170 Chapter Four. Purging the Elite: Politics and Lineage (1933-38) .................................. 224 Chapter Five. City on Paper: Writing Tajik in Stalinobod (1930-38) ............................ 282 Chapter Six. Islam and the Asilzodagon: Wartime and Postwar Leninobod .................. 352 Chapter Seven. The
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction on the Book Review Roundtable
    CIVIL WARS 2018, VOL. 20, NO. 3, 436–437 BOOK REVIEW Introduction on the Book Review Roundtable The Origins of the Civil War in Tajikistan: Nationalism, Islamism and Violent Conflict in Post-Soviet Space, by Tim Epkenhans, Lanham et al.: Lexington Books, 2016, 401 p, £84.63 (Hc). ISBN: 978-1-4985-3278-5 Located in Central Asia and bordering the north of Afghanistan, post-communist Tajikistan experienced a vicious five-year (1992–97) civil war only months into its independence from the Soviet Union, a war which, according to Islam, Iran and Central Asian historian, Professor Tim Epkenhans of the University of Freiburg, took anywhere from 40,000 to 100,000 lives out of a then population of 5.5 million. Tajikistan’s civil war thus took the second highest toll by way of body count in the post-Soviet space after the two Chechnya–Russia wars in the 1990s, which had resulted, according to The New York Times, in an estimated 160,000 dead. It is fair to state that the causes of the Tajik civil war were multiple, including the spread of Islamism among a segment of the population which had been inspired by their Persian speaking kin in Afghanistan and Iran, in addition to serious economic dislocation in the immediate aftermath of communist rule, and the consequent scramble for control of state-owned resources on the local and national levels by armed groups strengthened by ethno-regional and ideological fervour. The war pitted an alliance of neo-Soviets primarily based in the capital city Dushanbe and the southern Kulob region against Islamists largely made up of individuals of mountainous eastern Gharm origins, many of whose parents and grandparents had voluntarily moved in the Soviet era to the newly irrigated southern Vakhsh valley to become state cotton farmers in Tajikistan’s southern Qurghonteppa region, which became the violent epicentre of clashes during the civil war.
    [Show full text]
  • Performing and Remembering Subnational Internationalism in the Age of Developed Socialism
    Asymmetries of Internationalism: Performing and Remembering Subnational Internationalism in the Age of Developed Socialism TIMOTHY NUNAN In 1976, Dushanbe’s community of some 150 Iranian socialists traveled 28 kilometers into the mountains to attend the opening of a resort for the exclusive use of the Iranian community in the Tajik SSR. The resort reflected the initiative of several members of the Tudeh Party of Iran exiled to Dushanbe.1 As one exile noted, “on Saturdays and Sundays, more than fifty to sixty Iranian emigrants gathered there with their families. This resort took on the name “Iran Zone” (Iran Zon/Mantaqah-ye Iran).”2 The opening of “Iran Zone” was but one chapter in a long history of exchange between the Persian-speaking lands of the Tajik SSR, Iran, and Afghanistan during the twentieth century. The Soviet Union had sponsored the creation of Tajikistan as a Union Republic in 1929 partly to offer Iranians and Afghans a socialist model. And against the background of the Tajik SSR’s transformation into a “laboratory of socialist development” in the 1960s, Dushanbe also become a place of refuge and education for Iranian and Afghan socialists.3 The opening of a complex like I would like to thank the Volkswagen Foundation and the German Research Foundation for their support. I am also grateful to both Siarhei Bohdan and Natasha Klimenko at the Free University of Berlin for their feedback on various iterations of this article, and to Kurt Schultz of The Russian Review for guiding this article into print. The author acknowledges support by the Freie Universität Berlin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fault Lines of Violent Conflict in Tajikistan
    The Fault Lines of Violent Conflict in Tajikistan A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Australian National University. August 2011 Centre for Arab and Islamic Studies (The Middle East and Central Asia) College of Arts and Social Sciences The Australian National University Christian Mark Bleuer 2 Declaration Except where otherwise acknowledged in the text, this thesis is based upon my own original research. The work contained in this thesis has not been submitted for a higher degree to any other university or institute. _________________________ 12 August 2011 3 Acknowledgements First of all I would like to thank my dissertation committee: Professor Amin Saikal, Dr. Kirill Nourzhanov and Dr. Robert L. Canfield. I am extremely grateful to have had the benefit of this high level of expertise on Central Asia while a PhD candidate at The Centre for Arab and Islamic Studies (The Middle East and Central Asia). Professor Saikal provided the firm guidance that kept me on track and reasonably on time with my work. His knowledge of Central Asian culture, history and politics was invaluable. Dr. Nourzhanov’s deep understanding of Tajikistan and Central Asia is what allowed me to produce this dissertation. He never failed to guide me towards the best sources, and the feedback he provided on my numerous drafts enabled me to vastly improve on the work that I had produced. I am also very grateful to Dr. Canfield who, despite being far away at Washington University in St. Louis, graciously agreed to be on my dissertation committee. His comments and criticism were valuable in refining my dissertation into the state that it is now in.
    [Show full text]
  • Tajikistan: an Epidemic of Pneumonia Or Is It Coronavirus After All?
    Tajikistan: an epidemic of pneumonia or is it coronavirus after all? Tajik authorities still insist that there are no registered cases of coronavirus infection in the country. But the facts of mysterious deaths of dozens of people, transfer of bodies of deceased with strict precautionary measures, and quarantine of their relatives questions these allegations. Follow us on LinkedIn The first mysterious death in Tajikistan was revealed in early April. According to authorities, at that time a resident of Jabbor Rasulov district of the Sughd region, Khabibullo Shodiev died of pneumonia, and after his death the authorities quarantined all his relatives. The regional hospital of Jabbor Rasulov district where Shodiev was hospitalized was quarantined Central hospital of Jabbor Rasulov district. Photo: CABAR.asia along with the doctors who looked after the deceased. The reports about Shodiev’s death in Tajikistan were the reason for the start of a widespread debate about coronavirus in the public. Representatives of the Ministry of Health and Social Protection were forced to organize a special briefing, where they stated that the resident of Jabbor Rasulov district, died of pneumonia and not of coronavirus. Authorities stated that Shodiev tested negative for coronavirus. However, the Ministry of Health ignored requests from the representatives of civil society and the media for publication of the test Tajikistan: an epidemic of pneumonia or is it coronavirus after all? results thus heightening doubts about the accuracy of the Ministry’s claims. Ten days after the death of Khabibullo Toshev, another resident of Jabbor Rasulov district, Khojimuhammad Toshev, head of the resource center of the Education Department of Jabbor Rasulov district, also died from pneumonia.
    [Show full text]
  • "Book Reviews," Religion, State & Society
    Carfax Publishing Religion, State & Society, Vo!. 31, No. 2, 2003 • ",., Taylor Eo Francis Group Book Reviews Politics of Compromise: the Tajikistan Peace Process edited by Kamoludin Abdullaev and Catherine Barnes. Conciliation Resources, London, 2001, 100 pp. (Accord no. 10). £15.00/$25.00. Within months of the appearance of this collection of essays, Tajikistan was caught up in renewed conflict, though this time not of its own making - the aftermath of the September 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States, which saw this impoverished Central Asian state playing host to forces militarily engaged in neighbouring Afghanistan. For the outside world, Tajikistan was a useful base close to the action. Renewed interest in the country did little to help the instability and poverty persisting within Tajikistan in the aftermath of its own civil war which raged from summer 1992 to the peace agreement signed between the government and the opposition in Moscow in June 1997. This useful collection - with background essays by historians and actors in the conflict and its resolution, maps, documents (including the main points of the 1997 peace agreement), a chronology, profiles of key actors and political parties, and internet and book resources for further reading - is aimed at clarifying the issues that caused the war and at helping their resolution. Conciliation Resources, a London­ based peace-building NGO, hopes the book will renew interest in the legacy of a forgotten conflict among policy-makers, politicians, activists and ordinary people and will help 'draw lessons that could be used elsewhere'. Of all the wars which broke out as the Soviet Union disintegrated, Tajikistan's civil war was unique: it was the only nationwide conflict between different factions which had diverging ideological and religious views of how the state should be structured.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Party Development and Party “Gravity” in Semi-Authoritarian States the Cases of Azerbaijan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan
    Taiwan Journal of Democracy, Volume 4, No.1: 33-53 Political Party Development and Party “Gravity” in Semi-Authoritarian States The Cases of Azerbaijan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan John Ishiyama Abstract What has affected the development of political parties in the competitive authoritarian regimes of the former Soviet Union? In this essay, the author examines the development of political parties in the predominantly Muslim Central Eurasian states of Azerbaijan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan. In particular, he examines the extent to which political parties have become the primary channels for political recruitment, or the extent to which they have political gravity for electoral candidates. The author finds the greatest level of party gravity in Tajikistan, followed by Azerbaijan, and then Kyrgyzstan. A variety of social and political explanations are provided to account for these differences. Key words: Post-communist politics, semi-authoritarianism, political parties, Central Asia, Southern Caucasus. What has affected the development of political parties in the competitive authoritarian regimes of the former Soviet Union? In this essay, I examine the development of political parties in the predominantly Muslim Central Eurasian states of Azerbaijan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan.1 Although all are decidedly nondemocratic, they resemble “competitive authoritarian regimes” that have active, yet circumscribed, oppositions. Although there is a growing literature on semi- authoritarian regimes,2 there is very little literature on party John Ishiyama is Professor of Political Science in the Department of Political Science, University of North Texas. <[email protected]> 1 These three states were selected (although Azerbaijan is technically in the Caucasus and Kyrgzstan and Tajikistan are in Central Asia) because they share several common characteristics, most notably that they are predominantly Muslim, are all former Soviet States, and each fits the definition of a semi-authoritarian regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Islam After Communism UC-Khalid (E).Qxd 9/15/2006 1:02 PM Page Ii UC-Khalid (E).Qxd 9/15/2006 1:02 PM Page Iii
    UC-Khalid (E).qxd 9/15/2006 1:02 PM Page i Islam after Communism UC-Khalid (E).qxd 9/15/2006 1:02 PM Page ii UC-Khalid (E).qxd 9/15/2006 1:02 PM Page iii Islam after Communism Religion and Politics in Central Asia Adeeb Khalid UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley . Los Angeles . London UC-Khalid (E).qxd 9/15/2006 1:02 PM Page iv University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholar- ship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu. University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England © 2007 by The Regents of the University of California Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Khalid, Adeeb, 1964–. Islam after communism : religion and politics in Central Asia / Adeeb Khalid. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn-13: 978-0-520-24204-3 (cloth : alk. paper) isbn-10: 0-520-24204-1 (cloth : alk. paper) isbn-13: 978-0-520-24927-1 (pbk. : alk. paper) isbn-10: 0-520-24927-5 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Islam—Asia, Central. 2. Islamic renewal— Asia, Central. 3. Islam and politics—Asia, Central. 4. Religion and politics—Asia, Central. 5. Asia, Central—Politics and government. I. Title. BP63.A34K535 2007 297.2'720958—dc22 2006021901 Manufactured in the United States of America 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 10987654321 This book is printed on New Leaf EcoBook 50, a 100% recycled fiber of which 50% is de-inked postconsumer waste, processed chlorine-free.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Fragile Areas: Case Studies from Central Asia
    Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance Mapping Fragile Areas: Case Studies from Central Asia Elizaveta Chmykh Eugenia Dorokhova Hine-Wai Loose Kristina Sutkaityte Rebecca Mikova Richard Steyne Sarabeth Murray Edited by dr Grazvydas Jasutis Mapping Fragile Areas: Case Studies from Central Asia About DCAF DCAF – Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance is dedicated to improving the se- curity of states and their people within a framework of democratic governance, the rule of law, respect for human rights, and gender equality. Since its founding in 2000, DCAF has contributed to making peace and development more sustainable by assisting partner states, and international actors supporting these states, to improve the governance of their security sector through inclusive and participatory reforms. It creates innovative knowledge products, promotes norms and good practices, provides legal and policy advice and supports capacity-building of both state and non-state security sector stakeholders. DCAF’s Foundation Council is comprised of representatives of about 60 member states and the Canton of Geneva. Active in over 80 countries, DCAF is interna- tionally recognized as one of the world’s leading centres of excellence for security sector governance (SSG) and security sector reform (SSR). DCAF is guided by the principles of neutrality, impartiality, local ownership, inclusive participation, and gender equality. For more information visit www.dcaf.ch and follow us on Twitter @DCAF_Geneva. The views and opinions expressed in this study
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of Tajikistan
    COUNTRY FACT SHEET THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN May 2014 This Country Fact Sheet was financed by the European Refugee Fund and the Austrian Federal Office for Asylum and Immigration. The opinions expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Organization for Migration (IOM). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IOM concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning its frontiers or boundaries. IOM is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society. As an intergovernmental organization, IOM acts with its partners in the international community to: assist in meeting the operational challenges of migration; advance understanding of migration issues; encourage social and economic development through migration; and uphold the human dignity and well-being of migrants. Publisher: International Organization for Migration (IOM) Country Office for Austria Nibelungengasse 13/4 1010 Vienna Austria Tel: +43.1.585 33 22 Fax: +43.1.585 33 22 30 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.iom.int _____________________________________________________ © 2014 International Organization for Migration (IOM) _____________________________________________________ All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Tajikistan
    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 28 February 2010 OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission Final Report Warsaw 6 July 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 3 II. INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................... 5 III. BACKGROUND AND POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT................................................................ 5 IV. ELECTION SYSTEM AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................. 7 V. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................................... 8 A. FORMATION AND COMPOSITION OF ELECTION COMMISSIONS ....................................................... 8 B. TRANSPARENCY OF ELECTION COMMISSION WORK ...................................................................... 9 C. FUNCTIONING AND ACTIVITIES OF ELECTION COMMISSIONS ...................................................... 10 VI. VOTER REGISTRATION AND VOTER LISTS......................................................................... 11 VII. CANDIDATE REGISTRATION.................................................................................................... 11 A. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS ....................................................... 11 B. NOMINATION AND REGISTRATION OF CANDIDATES .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Text In
    The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS ISSN: 2357-1330 https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.12.04.388 SCTCMG 2019 International Scientific Conference «Social and Cultural Transformations in the Context of Modern Globalism» OUTSKIRTS OF EMPIRE IN MAELSTROM OF GLOBALIZATION: GORNO-BADAKHSHAN IN 1992-1994 Vladimir Shorokhov (a)*, Dmitry Ovsyannikov (b) *Corresponding author (a) St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya emb., St. Petersburg, Russia, [email protected], +79219723084 (b) St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya emb., St. Petersburg, Russia, [email protected], +79046447954 Abstract The article provides an analysis of the military-political situation in the Gorno-Badakhshan Autonomous Region in 1992-1994. The authors consider the events taking into account synchronous global trends of globalization. The new technological order gave rise to centrifugal and destructive processes on the periphery of the world system. The attempt to form national statehood in Tajikistan was blocked due to the disunity of various ethno-local groups of the population. Various actors were involved in the bloody civil war which lasted from 1992 to 1997. Before the war, their activities were checked by an alternative world development project and effective control over border regions. The policy of democratization, cultural “revival”, promotion of private initiative and foreign investment which began during the “restructuring” era opened the region for criminal-financial flows (drug trafficking) and migrants from neighboring Afghanistan. The attempts to raise status of the GBAO and legitimize the Autonomous Republic of Badakhshan were not successful; participation of a large number of actors aggravated the situation and did not contribute to the unity of the Pamir.
    [Show full text]