DOCSLIB.ORG

Emperor Hirohito and the February 26 Army Uprising

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Emperor Hirohito and the February 26 Army Uprising 01 Chapter H:Master Testpages Enigma 6/6/07 15:01 Page 1 CHAPTER 1 Emperor Hirohito and the February 26 Army Uprising ‘I shall personally assume command of the Imperial Guards Division ...’ Tempered pride n 8 September 1932, accompanied by members of his staff, OLieutenant General Honjo¯ Shigeru, former commander-in- chief of the Kwantung Army, appeared before the emperor to report on military affairs in Manchuria. Arriving at Tokyo Station at 11 o’clock in the morning, Honjo¯ and his entourage were met by a horse-drawn carriage provided by the Imperial Household Ministry, and rode in style across the Niju¯bashi Bridge into the palace grounds. After a formal greeting, there was to be a luncheon in the Hall of Ceremonies (Homeiden) hosted by the emperor himself, followed by tea and an opportunity for more informal conversation. All in all, it was top-drawer treatment, the kind that would be accorded to a triumphant commander. Considering General Honjo¯’s recent achievements, such a reception was to be expected: his ten-thousand-man Kwantung Army had routed a Chinese force some ten times its strength, brought almost all of Manchuria under Japanese control in just six months, and had founded the new state of Manchukuo. But there were factors which tempered Honjo¯’s pride; he was no Scipio returning from Carthage flushed with victory. For one thing, the spark that ignited the Manchurian Incident, the demolition of a section of South Manchurian Railway track, was the result of a plot masterminded by Lt. Colonel Ishiwara Kanji and Colonel Itagaki Seishiro¯ of Honjo¯’s own staff. Honjo¯ had reacted by going ahead with ever-expanding military operations, ignoring the 1 01 Chapter H:Master Testpages Enigma 6/6/07 15:01 Page 2 Hirohito: The Sho¯wa Emperor in War and Peace Japanese government’s international assurances that it would not expand hostilities, and brushing aside the attempts of the high command in Tokyo to limit the conflict. Moreover, the Kwantung Army had soon been joined by elements of the Japanese army in Korea, also acting independently, which had crossed the border into Manchuria on the pretext of coming to the aid of Honjo¯’s forces. All of this radically overstepped the bounds of independent initiative (dokudan senko¯ ) permitted by the Imperial Army Field Code, and could easily have been punished by court martial as criminal acts violating the emperor’s right of supreme command over the armed forces. Yet the emperor was widely seen as a remote figure – ‘above the clouds’, in the traditional phrase – unlikely to be aware of such events. At least that is what Major Katakura Tadashi, one of the staff officers who accompanied Honjo¯ to the imperial audience, thought. What he heard there startled him out of his complacency. During the informal discussion after the luncheon, the emperor turned to Honjo¯ and said quite bluntly: ‘There are rumours that the Manchurian Incident was a plot on the part of certain individuals – Is there anything to that?’ A hush fell over the room. General Honjo¯ rose to his feet, bowed deeply, and responded: ‘After the Incident, I too heard it said that a plot had been engineered by some army men and civilians, but I assure you that neither the Kwantung Army nor I were involved in any plot at the time.’l The emperor did not pursue the matter any further, much to Katakura’s relief, and no doubt to that of Lt. Colonel Ishiwara Kanji, ringleader of the plot, who was also present to hear Honjo¯ ’s smooth reply. Ishiwara, with remarkable arrogance, muttered: ‘Somebody’s certainly been whispering a lot of stuff in His Majesty’s ear.’ About six months after the audience, in April 1933, Honjo¯ was promoted to the rank of full general, and assigned to serve at the emperor’s side as his chief aide-de- camp.2 At the time, the newspapers said that ‘the incomparable integrity and loyalty of his character’ had inspired those selecting Honjo¯ for this post; how mistaken this judgement was would become glaringly obvious during the February 26 Incident two- and-a-half years later. Katakura and Itagaki would also be caughtup 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hirohito the Showa Emperor in War and Peace. Ikuhiko Hata.Pdf
    00 Prelims H:Master Testpages Enigma 6/6/07 15:00 Page i HIROHITO: THE SHO¯ WA EMPEROR IN WAR AND PEACE 00 Prelims H:Master Testpages Enigma 6/6/07 15:00 Page ii General MacArthur and Emperor Hirohito photographed in the US Embassy, Tokyo, shortly after the start of the Occupation in September 1945. (See page 187) 00 Prelims H:Master Testpages Enigma 6/6/07 15:00 Page iii Hirohito: The Sho¯wa Emperor in War and Peace Ikuhiko Hata NIHON UNIVERSITY Edited by Marius B. Jansen GLOBAL ORIENTAL 00 Prelims H:Master Testpages Enigma 6/6/07 15:00 Page iv HIROHITO: THE SHO¯ WA EMPEROR IN WAR AND PEACE by Ikuhiko Hata Edited by Marius B. Jansen First published in 2007 by GLOBAL ORIENTAL LTD P.O. Box 219 Folkestone Kent CT20 2WP UK www.globaloriental.co.uk © Ikuhiko Hata, 2007 ISBN 978-1-905246-35-9 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the Publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A CIP catalogue entry for this book is available from the British Library Set in Garamond 11 on 12.5 pt by Mark Heslington, Scarborough, North Yorkshire Printed and bound in England by Athenaeum Press, Gateshead, Tyne & Wear 00 Prelims H:Master Testpages Enigma 6/6/07 15:00 Page vi 00 Prelims H:Master Testpages Enigma 6/6/07 15:00 Page v Contents The Author and the Book vii Editor’s Preface
    [Show full text]
  • Omori Sogen the Art of a Zen Master
    Omori Sogen The Art of a Zen Master Omori Roshi and the ogane (large temple bell) at Daihonzan Chozen-ji, Honolulu, 1982. Omori Sogen The Art of a Zen Master Hosokawa Dogen First published in 1999 by Kegan Paul International This edition first published in 2011 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © The Institute of Zen Studies 1999 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 10: 0–7103–0588–5 (hbk) ISBN 13: 978–0–7103–0588–6 (hbk) Publisher’s Note The publisher has gone to great lengths to ensure the quality of this reprint but points out that some imperfections in the original copies may be apparent. The publisher has made every effort to contact original copyright holders and would welcome correspondence from those they have been unable to trace. Dedicated to my parents Contents Acknowledgements Introduction Part I - The Life of Omori Sogen Chapter 1 Shugyo: 1904–1934 Chapter 2 Renma: 1934–1945 Chapter 3 Gogo no Shugyo: 1945–1994 Part II - The Three Ways Chapter 4 Zen and Budo Chapter 5 Practical Zen Chapter 6 Teisho: The World of the Absolute Present Chapter 7 Zen and the Fine Arts Appendices Books by Omori Sogen Endnotes Index Acknowledgments Many people helped me to write this book, and I would like to thank them all.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawsuit Seeks Japanese Government Compensation for Siberian Detention
    Volume 7 | Issue 48 | Number 1 | Article ID 3261 | Nov 30, 2009 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Lawsuit Seeks Japanese Government Compensation for Siberian Detention: Who was Responsible for Abandoning Japanese Soldiers and Settlers in Mainland Asia After World War II? 連載特集 法廷で裁かれる日本の戦争責任４０。賠償起訴の 始まり シベリア抑留国家賠償請求起訴日本政府の棄兵、棄民政策を問 う。 Murai Toyoaki Lawsuit Seeks Japanese Government Declaration—August 15, 19453—the Soviet Compensation for SiberianUnion declared war against Japan on August 8, Detention: Who was Responsible for 1945, renouncing the Japan-Soviet Neutrality Treaty of 1941. The USSR immediately crossed Abandoning Japanese Soldiers and the borders of northeast China (Manchuria), Settlers in Mainland Asia After northern Korea, and southern Sakhalin (which World War II? were all Japanese colonies), and the Kuril Islands. They engaged in combat with the Japanese army in these areas. Even after the Murai Toyoaki Potsdam Declaration’s de facto ending of World War II, fighting between Japan and the Soviet Nobuko ADACHI translator Union continued through early September until Why Compensation? a cease fire was declared. 4 We submitted a “Request for Compensation for Joseph Stalin, the leader of the Soviet Union Siberian Detention” to the Kyoto Local Court and the Head of the National Defense on December 26, 2007, seeking redress from Committee of the USSR, on August 23, 1945 the Japanese government. We are asking for issued the top secret order “Regarding the ¥30,000,0001 for each plaintiff as compensation Arrest of Half a Million Japanese Soldiers: How (and accepting ¥10,000,0002 compensation as and Where to Detain Them, and How to Utilize partial settlement).
    [Show full text]
  • The Atomic Bombs and the Soviet Invasion: What Drove Japan's Decision to Surrender?
    Volume 5 | Issue 8 | Article ID 2501 | Aug 01, 2007 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus The Atomic Bombs and the Soviet Invasion: What Drove Japan's Decision to Surrender? Tsuyoshi Hasegawa The Atomic Bombs and the SovietFrank, have recently confronted this issue Invasion: What Drove Japan’s Decision to head-on, arguing that the atomic bombing of Surrender? Hiroshima had a more decisive effect on Japan’s decision to surrender than did Soviet Tsuyoshi HASEGAWA entry into the war.[4] This essay challenges that view. It argues that (1) the atomic Almost immediately following the end of World bombing of Nagasaki did not have much effect War II, Americans began to question the use of on Japan’s decision; (2) of the two factors—the the atomic bomb and the circumstances atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Soviet entry surrounding the end of the Pacific War. More into the war—the Soviet invasion had a more than half a century later, books and articles on important effect on Japan’s decision to the atomic bomb still provoke storms of debate surrender; (3) nevertheless, neither the atomic among readers and the use of atomic weapons bombs nor Soviet entry into the war served as remains a sharply contested subject.[1] As the “a knock-out punch” that had a direct, decisive, 1995 controversy over the Enola Gay exhibit at and immediate effect on Japan’s decision to the Smithsonian’s National Air and Space surrender; (4) the most important, immediate Museum revealed, the issues connected with cause behind Japan’s decision to surrender the dropping of the bombs on Hiroshima and were the emperor’s “sacred decision” to do so, Nagasaki continue to touch a sensitive nerve in engineered by a small group of the Japanese Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Analecta Nipponica
    5/2016 Analecta Nipponica JOURNAL OF POLISH ASSOCIATION FOR JAPANESE STUDIES Analecta Nipponica JOURNAL OF POLISH ASSOCIATIOn FOR JapanESE STUDIES 5/2016 Analecta Nipponica JOURNAL OF POLISH ASSOCIATIOn FOR JapanESE STUDIES Analecta Nipponica JOURNAL OF POLISH ASSOCIATIOn FOR JapanESE STUDIES Editor-in-Chief Alfred F. Majewicz Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń Editorial Board Agnieszka Kozyra University of Warsaw, Jagiellonian University in Kraków Iwona Kordzińska-Nawrocka University of Warsaw Editing in English Aaron Bryson Editing in Japanese Fujii Yoko-Karpoluk Editorial Advisory Board Moriyuki Itō Gakushūin University in Tokyo Mikołaj Melanowicz University of Warsaw Sadami Suzuki International Research Center for Japanese Studies in Kyoto Hideo Watanabe Shinshū University in Matsumoto Estera Żeromska Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań The publication was financed by Takashima Foundation Copyright© 2015 by Polish Association for Japanese Studies and Contributing Authors. ANALECTA NIPPONICA: Number 5/2015 ISSN: 2084-2147 Published by: Polish Association for Japanese Studies Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28, 00-927 Warszawa, Poland www.psbj.orient.uw.edu.pl University of Warsaw Printers (Zakłady Graficzne UW) Order No. 1312/2015 Contents Editor’s preface ...............................................................7 ARTICLES Iijima Teruhito, 日本の伝統芸術―茶の美とその心 .............................11 English Summary of the Article Agnieszka Kozyra, The Oneness of Zen and the Way of Tea in the Zen Tea Record (Zencharoku) .............................................21
    [Show full text]
  • The Issues of War with Japan Coverage in the Presidential Project «Fundamental Multi-Volume Work» the Great Patriotic War of 1941 - 1945 «»
    Vyatcheslav Zimonin Captain (Russia NAVY) Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor of Military University, Honored Scientist Of The Russian Federation and Academy of Natural Sciences The issues of war with Japan coverage in the Presidential project «Fundamental multi-volume work» The Great Patriotic War of 1941 - 1945 «» Fundamental multi-volume work «The Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945» is being developed in accordance with the Decree № 240-рп of May 5, 2008 of the President of the Russian Federation. The work is developed under the organizational leadership of the main drafting committee headed by the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation Army General Sergey Shoigu. Major General V.A. Zolotarev, well-known Russian scientist, Doctor of Historical and Legal Sciences, Professor, Academician of the Academy of Natural Sciences, State Councilor of the Russian Federation Deputy Chairman of the GRK is appointed as scientific director of the multi-volume work. Fundamental structure of a multivolume work: Volume 1 - «The main facts of the war,» Volume 2 - «The origin and the beginning of the war» Volume 3 - «Battles and actions that changed the course of the war,» Volume 4 - «Freeing of the USSR, 1944 « Volume 5 - «The final victory. Final operations of World War II in Europe. War with Japan « Volume 6 - «The Secret War. Intelligence and counterintelligence in the Great Patriotic War « Volume 7 - «Economy and weapons of war» Volume 8 - «Foreign policy and diplomacy of the Soviet Union during the war» Volume 9 - «Allies of the USSR in the war» Volume 10 - «The power, society and war» Volume 11 - «Policy and Strategy of Victory.
    [Show full text]
  • August 20, 1945 Cable from Aleksandr Vasilevsky to Stalin
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified August 20, 1945 Cable from Aleksandr Vasilevsky to Stalin Citation: “Cable from Aleksandr Vasilevsky to Stalin,” August 20, 1945, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, Library of Congress, Manuscript Division, Dmitriĭ Antonovich Volkogonov papers, 1887-1995, mm97083838, Reel 5, containers 7 through 9. Also published in V.P. Galitskii, V.P. Zimonin, “Desant na Khokkaido Otmenit’,” Voenno-Istoricheskii Zhurnal, No. 3 (1994), pp. 7-8. Translated by Sergey Radchenko. https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/122336 Summary: Vasilevsky reports on the progress of the Soviet invasion of Manchuria and the surrender of Japanese forces. Original Language: Russian Contents: English Translation Scan of Original Document Moscow. Cde. Stalin Copy: General Staff Cde. Antonov Reporting on the situation on the Far Eastern front at the end of 19.8.45. 1. On 19.8.45 on all fronts in Manchuria the resistance of the Japanese forces ceased and our forces began planned disarmament of the forces of the enemy. During the day of 19.8.45 about 65 thousand Japanese-Manchurian forces were disarmed. 2. During the day the forces of the Transbaikal Front deployed air troops with responsible representatives of the command of the Front to Changchun and Mukden [Shenyang], 250-300 people in each city. Our forces in the aforesaid cities were met with warm welcome on the part of the Japanese command and representatives of the Japanese authorities. All demands of our representatives are being fully implemented. During the night of 20.8.45 these cities are being approached by our forward mobile detachments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manchurian Incident
    Part 1 - The Manchurian Incident Chronology 1911 October 10 - Xinhai Revolution 1922 February 6 - Nine-Powers Treaty (Washington Naval Conference) 1931 September 18 - Manchurian Incident 1932 March 1 - Manchukuo is founded September 4 - Lytton Report is released 1933 March 27 - Japan withdraws from the League of Nations (effective 1935 March 27) May 31 - Tanggu Truce 1935 June 10 - He-Umezu Agreement 1936 December 12 - Xian Incident 1937 July 7 - Marco Polo Bridge Incident July 11 - Local ceasefire agreement July 29 - Tongzhou Massacre August 9 - Murder of Sublieutenant Oyama August 13 - Battle of Shanghai August 15 - Chiang Kai-shek issues general mobilization order August 21 - Sino-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact October 2 - Landing of Japan's 10th Army at Hangzhou Bay leads to the collapse of the Chinese Army in Shanghai November 5 - Japan makes peace offer through German Ambassador to China Oskar Trautmann December 1 - Order to capture Nanking is issued December 13 - Fall of Nanking, the Japanese Army enters Nanking December 22 - Japan reissues its peace terms through Trautmann 1938 January 16 - First Konoe Statement cuts ties with Chiang Kai- shek's regime November 3 - Second Konoe Statement declares a new order in Asia December 22 - Third Konoe Statement enunciates the principles of friendly relations with neighbors, anti-communism, and economic cooperation 1940 March 30 - Establishment of the Republic of China in Nanking 1943 November 5-6 - Greater East Asia Conference is convened in Tokyo 1 How did 10,400 Japanese soldiers occupy Manchuria? On September 18, 1931, a line of the South Manchuria Railway at Liutiaogou, about eight kilometers north of the city of Mukden, was blown apart.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changkufeng and Nomonhan Incidents – the Undeclared Border War and Its Impact on World War Ii
    University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2014-01-01 The hC angkufeng And Nomonhan Incidents - The Undeclared Border War And Its Impact on World War II Tobias Block University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the Asian History Commons, Asian Studies Commons, Military History Commons, Slavic Languages and Societies Commons, and the Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Commons Recommended Citation Block, Tobias, "The hC angkufeng And Nomonhan Incidents - The ndeU clared Border War And Its Impact on World War II" (2014). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 1588. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/1588 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CHANGKUFENG AND NOMONHAN INCIDENTS – THE UNDECLARED BORDER WAR AND ITS IMPACT ON WORLD WAR II TOBIAS BLOCK DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY APPROVED: __________________________________________ Joshua Fan, Ph.D., Chair __________________________________________ Paul Edison, Ph.D. __________________________________________ Jose Villalobos, Ph.D. __________________________________ Bess Sirmon-Taylor, Ph.D. Interim Dean of the Graduate School THE CHANGKUFENG AND NOMONHAN INCIDENTS - THE UNDECLARED BORDER WAR AND ITS IMPACT ON WORLD WAR II by Tobias Block, BA Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department Of HISTORY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS OF EL PASO May 2014 Table of Contents Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • The Move to Global War Japan 1931-1941
    Timeline of Key Events - Paper 1 - The Move to Global War Japan 1931-1941 Revision Activities - Remembering the chronological order and specific dates is an ​ important skill in IBDP History and can help you to organise the flow of events and how they are connected. Studied the timeline of key events below, taken from the IBDP specification, and test yourself often. ​ Japanese Foreign Policy Events - Events related to International Cooperation and ​ ​ Collective Security - International Responses to Japanese Aggression ​ ​ 1853 July - Commodore Perry sails into Nagasaki harbour to open trade negotiations ​ ​ ​ ​ with the Japanese emperor 1854 31 March - Treaty of Kanagawa with the USA signed by Shogun Tokugawa ​ ​ ​ Yoshinobu 1868 3 January - Meiji Restoration - Restoration of Meiji rule is declared. The Boshin ​ ​ ​ ​ War breaks out between forces of the ex-Tokugawa Shogun and Imperial Court. ​ 1873 Mass conscription is introduced ​ 1874 1 February - Meirokusha (Meiji 6 Society) is formed to promote what is called ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ‘civilisation and enlightenment’ through its social-criticism journal ‘Meiroku Zasshi’ 1877 29 January - The Satsuma Rebellion of disaffected Samurai begins. By ​ ​ ​ September, its leader, Saigo Takamori, committed suicide ending the last and most serious uprising against the new Meiji government 1881 Gen'yōsha (Dark/Black Ocean Society) founded in Japan as an ultranationalist ​ secret political and social group. It used criminal means to achieve its ends, believing in Pan-Asianism and called for increasing Japanese influence over mainland Asia. 1882 4 January - The Imperial Rescript to Soldiers and Sailors is published. ​ ​ ​ Established the principle of absolute loyalty to the Emperor, and banned soldiers from expressing political opinions or comments on imperial policy 1889 11 February - The Emperor promulgates the Constitution of the Empire of Japan ​ ​ providing Japan with a constitutional monarchy on the Prussian model.
    [Show full text]
  • The Failure of Japanese Tactics at Changkufeng and Nomonhan And
    “Because We Were Japanese Soldiers”: The Failure of Japanese Tactics at Changkufeng and Nomonhan and Lessons Left Unlearned Ryan Schultz Oberlin College Department of History Honors Thesis April 29, 2011 Table of Contents Abbreviations iii Acknowledgements iv Introduction: The Winding Course to War 1 Section I: A Natural Sphere of Influence 5 Section II: Building Manchuria 9 Section III: Battle of Lake Khasan/Ch ōkoh ō Jiken 20 Section IV: Battle of Khalkin Gol/Nomonhan Jiken 32 Conclusion: Tactical Failure and Strategic Underestimation 54 Epilogue: Another “August Storm” 58 Works Cited 63 ii Abbreviations AA – anti-aircraft AP – armor piercing CER – Chinese Eastern Railway IJA – Imperial Japanese Army MG – machine gun MPR – Mongolian People’s Republic iii Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude to a number of people who have invaluably assisted me with the research and preparation of this paper. Emer O’Dwyer provided the original impetus two years ago, when I was first introduced to these far off, indistinct battles in her seminar course on the history of northeastern China. My consideration of Operation ‘August Storm’ is also adapted from my final paper for that course, and it was Professor O’Dwyer who encouraged me to make an honors project out of it. Leonard Smith has been my indefatigable advisor during Professor O’Dwyer’s leave, providing me with both the sharp considerations of someone well- versed in this history but also the criticism and insight of a non-Asian specialist. Ann Sherif provided me with a basic understanding of how to read wartime Japanese documents and encouraged me to persist even when they seemed indecipherable.
    [Show full text]
  • Tokyo Modern I: Koizumi Kishio's 100 Views of the Imperial Capital (1928–1940)
    MODERNITY’S UNDERCURRENTS In celebrating Tokyo’s rebirth, the “creative prints” (sōsaku-hanga) artists revealed themselves to be thoroughly bourgeois urbanites. Industrialization drew their attention mostly in the form of engineering projects, smokestacks, Western-style buildings, and the revolution in mass transportation. Working-class activities were observed fleetingly at best. In Koizumi’s series, for example, this includes dying cloth for kimono and two contrasting versions of a picturesque lumberyard. “This is an unusual view from the old days,” Koizumi wrote in his 1940 annotation for this print created ten years earlier. “I wonder if it still exists?” “Dye Factory at Waseda (#08),” November 1930 "Tokyo Modern l" by James T. Ulak 4 - 1 “Lumberyards at Kiba (#65),” July 1935 “Lumberyards at Kiba in the Snow (#65-revised),” February 1940 Private collection The only hint of agriculture—and the fact that the great majority of Japan’s population was engaged in this—was Koizumi’s rendering of the new central vegetable market in Kanda, and a nostalgic depiction of a post-earthquake suburb where daikon, the succulent big white radish, was still grown. "Tokyo Modern l" by James T. Ulak 4 - 2 “Vegetable Market at Kanda (#16),” September 1931 Damage from the earthquake required the reconstruction of Tokyo's food markets, including the Central Wholesale Market at Tsukij. Vegetable sales were transacted under tented stalls along the Kanda River to facilitate the shipping of goods. The concrete-and-glass warehouse was built to withstand future earthquakes and fire. Harvesting daikon. “Landscape at Nerima Ward (#73),” November 1935 "Tokyo Modern l" by James T.
    [Show full text]