DOCSLIB.ORG

BIBLIOGRAPHY Chapter 1: "A Conflagration Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BIBLIOGRAPHY Chapter 1: Bibliography - “The 23rd Cycle:Learning to live with a stormy star” Dr. Sten Odenwald ©2000 B I B L I O G R A P H Y Chapter 1: "A Conflagration of Storms" Allen, Joe. 1990. 1989 solar activity and its consequences at Earth and in space. Seventh Symposium on Single Event Effects Conference. April 24-25, 1990. Los Angeles. Broad, William. 1989. Space shuttle problem could cut flight short", The New York Times, March 15, 1989 p. A16. Boston Globe Staff. Quebec blackout halts power for 3 million. The Boston Globe. March 14, 1989 p.6. Curran, Peggy. 1989. Hydro blames sun for power failure. The Montreal Gazette. March 14, 1989 p.1. ------ 1989. Hydro execs start post-mortem on huge blackout. The Montreal Gazette. March 15, 1989 A3. Fairbanks Daily News Staff. 1989. Solar flare possibly the biggest ever recorded. The Fairbanks Daily News, March 12, 1989 p. E10. ------ 1989. Solar storm sets night skies afire. The Fairbanks Daily News. March 14, 1989 p.3. Fisher, Lawrence. 1997. Failure of AT&T satellite will alter deal with Loral. The New York Times. January 18, 1997 p. 36. Johnson, Jason. 1997. Power failure throws stadium for a loop. The Boston Herald. January 13, 1997 p. 7. Kappenman, John. 1990. Bracing for the geomagnetic storms. IEEE Spectrum. March 1990. P. 27-32. 1 Bibliography - “The 23rd Cycle:Learning to live with a stormy star” Dr. Sten Odenwald ©2000 Los Angeles Times Staff. 1997. AT&T working to regain link with satellite: Telecom Telstar 401 is part of communications business to be sold to Loral for $712.5 million. The Los Angeles Times. January 15, 1997 p1. Montreal Gazette Staff. 1989. 11-hour power failure stopped the presses. The Montreal Gazette. March 12, 1989 p. A3. ------ 1989. Hydros export clients lend a hand with power. The Montreal Gazette. March 14, 1989 A3. New York Times Staff. 1989. Large solar flare erupts anew", The New York Times, March 13, 1989 p.1. Orlando Sentinel Staff. 1997. AT&T moves signals after satellite halts broadcast. The Orlando Sentinel. January 12, 1997 p.A22. Perera, Judith. 1989. March flares mark solar unrest. New Scientist, 25 March 1989. Rinehart, Steve. 1989. Light Show amazes, worries, Lower 48 watchers", The Anchorage Daily News, March 15, 1989 p.B11. Showstack, Randy. 1998. Upcoming solar maximum could affect wide range of technologies. EOS Transactions. 79:601 Toronto Star Staff. 1989. Huge storms on Sun linked to blackout that crippled Quebec", Toronto Star, March 13 1989 p. A3 Vestner, Charlie. 1998. The sky's the limit:In the 21st century satellites will connect the globe. Individual Investor. June 1998,. pp. 56-64. 2 Bibliography - “The 23rd Cycle:Learning to live with a stormy star” Dr. Sten Odenwald ©2000 Chapter 2: "Dancing in the Light" Anselmo, Joseph, Solar storm eyed as satellite killer. Aviation Week and Space Technology, January 27, 1997, p. 61. Bone, Neil. 1996. The aurora: Sun-earth interactions. New York:Wiley and Sons. Brekke, Pal. 1998. Solar eruptions and effects on the Earth's environment. May 18, 1998. www.uio.no/~paalb/report/report.html Dooling, Dave. 1995. Stormy weather in space, IEEE Spectrum, June 1995 p.64. Green, Arthur and William Brown. 1997. Reducing the risk from geomagnetic hazards; On the watch for geomagnetic storms. United States Geological Service Fact Sheet [USGS177-97] (geohazards.cr.usgs.gov/factsheets/html_files/geomag/geomag.html). Holliman, John. 1997. Sun ejection killed TV satellite. CNN.com, Jan 21, 1997 (www.cnn.com/TECH/9701/21/cosmic.chaos/) DeCotis, Mark. 1997. AT&T's Telstar 401 satellite fails. Florida Today: Space Online. (http://www.flatoday.com/space/explore/stories/1997/011397f.htm.) Leary, Warren. 1997. Researchers get first detailed look at magnetic cloud from sun. New York Times. January 23, 1997 p. A17. McCaffery, Richard, "Faulty Materials Blamed in Failure of Telstar 401. Space News, May 26, 1997 p.1. Odenwald, Sten. 1999. Solar Storms; coming to a sky near you. Washington Post, March 10, 1999, p.H01. -----. 2000. Solar storms: The silent menace. Sky and Telescope March 2000. (In Press). Reeves, Geoff. 1997. Discover Magazine. June 1997, p. 36. 3 Bibliography - “The 23rd Cycle:Learning to live with a stormy star” Dr. Sten Odenwald ©2000 Roylance, Frank. 1997. Tracking a solar storm from cradle to grave. The Baltimore Sun. January 23, 1997 p.1. Savage, Candace. 1994. Aurora: The Mysterious Northern Lights, San Francisco:Sierra Club Books, pp. 37-38. Sawyer, Kathy. 1997. Earth takes a one-two punch from a solar magnetic cloud. The Washington Post. January 23, 1997 p.1. Sheldon, Robert. 1998. On the Physical Origin and Prediction of Killer Electron Storms. Journal of Geophysical Research, (Submitted). Summary at: http://cspar181.uah.edu/RbS/GRL5/grl_may.html Reply to Referees at: http://cspar181.uah.edu/RbS/GRL5/referee1a.html. Thomsen, Michell and Borovsky, Joe, Reaction of magnetosphere to Jan10-11 event, as Seen by 3 MPA Instruments at Geosynchronous Orbit. www- istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/istp/cloud_jan97/lanl-jan10-11.html Walker, Matt. 1998. Flirting with disaster: The ever-shrinking microchip is increasingly vulnerable to an invisible enemy. New Scientist, November 7, 1998. Chapter 3: "Hello is anyone there? Adams, W.G. 1881. Magnetic disturbances, auroras and earth currents. Nature. 25:66. American Journal of Science and Arts Staff. Aurora borealis (of November 17, 1848). American Journal of Science and Arts. 12:442. Barrett, W. 1886. Earth-Currents and Aurora. Nature. 34:408. Bernard, Fredrick. 1837. Aurora Borealis of November 14, 1837. American Journal of Science and Arts. 34:286 4 Bibliography - “The 23rd Cycle:Learning to live with a stormy star” Dr. Sten Odenwald ©2000 Boss, Lewis. 1941. The aurora of September 18-19, 1941. Popular Astronomy,. 49:504. Boston Globe Staff. 1892. Tide of light: Telegraphic communication suffers some. The Boston Globe, February 14, 1892, p. 2. (The Great Aurora of February 1892). -------1940. US hit by magnetic storm: Wires, cable, radio crippled for hours. The Boston Globe March 25, 1940. P. 1. ------ 1946. Aurora borealis flash startles hub area. Boston Globe, July 27, 1946 p.1 Chester, Charles. 1848. On the electric telegraph of Prof. Morse. Journal of American Science and Arts. 5: 55. Chicago Daily News. 1958. Aurora puts on display in northern sky. Chicago Daily Tribune. February 11, 1958 p.4. Chicago Tribune Staff. 1946. Chicagoans see sky alight with aurora display. The Chicago Tribune July 27, 1946, p. 5 Dietrich, William et al. 1942. Auroral burst supreme. Sky and Telescope. 1:14. (Great Aurora of 1941) Fahie, John 1974. A history of electric telegrapy to the year 1837. New York:Arno Press. 1974. Henry, Joseph. 1847. On the induction of atmospheric electricity on the wires of the electrical telegraph. Journal of American Science and Arts. 3:25. Herrick, E. 1849. Aurora borealis of November 17, 1848. American Journal of Science and Arts. 7:127, 7:293. ------ 1860. The great auroral exhibition of August 28th to September 4th, 1859. American Journal of Science and Artst. 28:385-408, 29: 92-97. Herron, Edward. 1969. Miracle of the air waves: A history of radio. New York:Messner, 5 Bibliography - “The 23rd Cycle:Learning to live with a stormy star” Dr. Sten Odenwald ©2000 1969p. 68. Highton, Edward. 1852. The Electric Telegraph: It's History and Progress. London, p.144. Lefroy, J. 1852. Second report on observations of the aurora borealis, 1850-1851. The American Journal of Science and Arts. 14:155. Leinbach, Harold. 1956. February sunspots and a red aurora. Sky and Telescope. 15:329. London Times Staff. 1903. Telegraph disturbance in France. London Times, November 2, 1903 p. 6. ------ 1921. Sunspots and Earth storms. London Times, May 19, 1921 p.7. (May 1921 Great Aurora) ------1926. U.S. wireless reception experiments: partial success", London Times, January 28, 1926 p. 13. Nature Staff. 1938. The aurora of January 25. Nature. 141: 232. New York Times Staff. 1882. A storm of electricity: Telegraph wires useless for several hours. New York Times, November 18, 1882 . p. 1. ------ 1903. Northern lights display: Telegraph and cable lines suffer by electrical disturbance. New York Times, November 1, 1903. P. 1. ------ 1903. Made the wires deadly. New York Times. November 1, 1903. p. 6. ------ 1917. Wires held up: Earth currents put them out of commission for hours. The New York Times. August 9, 1917 p.8. ------ 1937. Sunspots predict radio disturbances. The New York Times April 5, 1937, p.15. ------ 1937. Magnetic storm worst in century. The New York Times April 29, 1937, p. 23. ------ 1937. Aurora borealis hits wire services:Current from magnetic pole causes record interference in Canada. The New York Times. April 29, 1937 p.23. 6 Bibliography - “The 23rd Cycle:Learning to live with a stormy star” Dr. Sten Odenwald ©2000 ------ 1938. Aurora borealis startles Europe: People flee in fear, call firemen. The New York Times, January 26, 1938, p. 25. ----- 1940. Sunspot tornado disrupts cables, phones and telegraphs for hours: Electrical disturbance plays havoc with the short-wave, 1,000,000 Easter messages, and police and press teletypes. The New York Times, March 25, 1940 p. 1. ------ 1941. Northern lights soon: Unexpected sunspots may cause magnetic storms. The New York Times. September 18, 1941 p. 1. ------ 1941. Aurora borealis gives city a show as sun spots disorganize radio. The New York Times. September 19, 1941 p. 25. ------ 1941. Sunspots add some radio spice", The New York Times. September 20, 1941 p.41. ------ 1946. Sun spots block radio messages: Magnetic storm is sweeping the Earth due to intensify for 12 more days . New York Times February 3, 1946 p. 26. ------ 1956. Rare aurora glimpsed: Northern lights with red arc seen in Alaska.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spacecraft System Failures and Anomalies Attributed to the Natural Space Environment
    NASA Reference Publication 1390 - j Spacecraft System Failures and Anomalies Attributed to the Natural Space Environment K.L. Bedingfield, R.D. Leach, and M.B. Alexander, Editor August 1996 NASA Reference Publication 1390 Spacecraft System Failures and Anomalies Attributed to the Natural Space Environment K.L. Bedingfield Universities Space Research Association • Huntsville, Alabama R.D. Leach Computer Sciences Corporation • Huntsville, Alabama M.B. Alexander, Editor Marshall Space Flight Center • MSFC, Alabama National Aeronautics and Space Administration Marshall Space Flight Center ° MSFC, Alabama 35812 August 1996 PREFACE The effects of the natural space environment on spacecraft design, development, and operation are the topic of a series of NASA Reference Publications currently being developed by the Electromagnetics and Aerospace Environments Branch, Systems Analysis and Integration Laboratory, Marshall Space Flight Center. This primer provides an overview of seven major areas of the natural space environment including brief definitions, related programmatic issues, and effects on various spacecraft subsystems. The primary focus is to present more than 100 case histories of spacecraft failures and anomalies documented from 1974 through 1994 attributed to the natural space environment. A better understanding of the natural space environment and its effects will enable spacecraft designers and managers to more effectively minimize program risks and costs, optimize design quality, and achieve mission objectives. .o° 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Probability of Collision in the Geostationary Orbit*
    PROBABILITY OF COLLISION IN THE GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT* Raymond A. LeClair and Ramaswamy Sridharan MIT Lincoln Laboratory, 244 Wood Street, Lexington, Massachusetts 02420 USA, Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT/RESUME The initial Geosynchronous Encounter Analysis (GEA) CRDA spanned two years beginning in mid 1997. The advent of geostationary satellite communication During this period, Lincoln Laboratory provided timely 37 years ago, and the resulting continued launch activ- warning of encounters between Telstar 401 and partner ity, has created a population of active and inactive geo- satellites and precision orbits for these objects for use synchronous satellites which will interact, with genu- in avoidance maneuver planning [1]. In all, 32 en- ine possibility of collision, for the foreseeable future. counters between Telstar 401 and a partner satellite As a result of the failure of Telstar 401 three years ago, were supported in 24 months leading to nine avoidance MIT Lincoln Laboratory, in cooperation with commer- maneuvers incorporated into routine station keeping cial partners, began an investigation into this situation. and six dedicated avoidance maneuvers. This process Under the agreement, Lincoln worked to ensure a col- has led to a validated concept of operations for en- lision did not occur between Telstar 401 and partner counter support at Lincoln. satellites and to understand the scope and nature of the Active problem. The results of this cooperative activity and Satellites recent results to carefully characterize the actual prob- SOLIDARIDAD 02 ANIK E1 04-Oct-1999 ability of collision in the geostationary orbit are de- 114 SOLIDARIDAD 1 GOES 07 scribed. ANIK E2 112 MSAT M01 ) ANIK C1 110 GSTAR 04 deg USA 0114 1.
    [Show full text]
  • <> CRONOLOGIA DE LOS SATÉLITES ARTIFICIALES DE LA
    1 SATELITES ARTIFICIALES. Capítulo 5º Subcap. 10 <> CRONOLOGIA DE LOS SATÉLITES ARTIFICIALES DE LA TIERRA. Esta es una relación cronológica de todos los lanzamientos de satélites artificiales de nuestro planeta, con independencia de su éxito o fracaso, tanto en el disparo como en órbita. Significa pues que muchos de ellos no han alcanzado el espacio y fueron destruidos. Se señala en primer lugar (a la izquierda) su nombre, seguido de la fecha del lanzamiento, el país al que pertenece el satélite (que puede ser otro distinto al que lo lanza) y el tipo de satélite; este último aspecto podría no corresponderse en exactitud dado que algunos son de finalidad múltiple. En los lanzamientos múltiples, cada satélite figura separado (salvo en los casos de fracaso, en que no llegan a separarse) pero naturalmente en la misma fecha y juntos. NO ESTÁN incluidos los llevados en vuelos tripulados, si bien se citan en el programa de satélites correspondiente y en el capítulo de “Cronología general de lanzamientos”. .SATÉLITE Fecha País Tipo SPUTNIK F1 15.05.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK F2 21.08.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK 01 04.10.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK 02 03.11.1957 URSS Científico VANGUARD-1A 06.12.1957 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 01 31.01.1958 USA Científico VANGUARD-1B 05.02.1958 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 02 05.03.1958 USA Científico VANGUARD-1 17.03.1958 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 03 26.03.1958 USA Científico SPUTNIK D1 27.04.1958 URSS Geodésico VANGUARD-2A
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts
    Federal Aviation Administration 2013 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts May 2013 FAA Commercial Space Transportation (AST) and the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) • i • 2013 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover: The Orbital Sciences Corporation’s Antares rocket is seen as it launches from Pad-0A of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport at the NASA Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia, Sunday, April 21, 2013. Image Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. • i • Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 1 COMSTAC 2013 COMMERCIAL GEOSYNCHRONOUS ORBIT LAUNCH DEMAND FORECAST .
    [Show full text]
  • NASA NASA - NSSDC - Spacecraft - Query Results
    Cronología de Lanzamientos Espaciales Año 1993 Recopilación de datos Ing. Eladio Miranda Batlle. Los textos, imágenes y tablas fueron obtenidos de la National Space Science. Data Center. NASA NASA - NSSDC - Spacecraft - Query Results Wednesday, 04 May 2011 NSSDC Master Catalog Search Spacecraft Experiments Data Collections Spacecraft Query Results Personnel Publications There were 116 spacecraft returned. Maps Spacecraft Name NSSDC ID Launch Date New/Updated Data ACTS 1993-058B 1993-09-11 Lunar/Planetary Events Alexis 1993-026A 1993-04-24 Arasene 1993-031B 1993-05-11 ASCA 1993-011A 1993-02-19 Astra 1C 1993-031A 1993-05-11 Atlas 2 ATLAS2 1993-04-07 Cosmos 2230 1993-001A 1993-01-11 Cosmos 2231 1993-004A 1993-01-18 Cosmos 2232 1993-006A 1993-01-25 Cosmos 2233 1993-008A 1993-02-08 Cosmos 2234 1993-010A 1993-02-16 Cosmos 2235 1993-010B 1993-02-16 Cosmos 2236 1993-010C 1993-02-16 Cosmos 2237 1993-016A 1993-03-25 Cosmos 2238 1993-018A 1993-03-29 Cosmos 2239 1993-020A 1993-04-01 Cosmos 2240 1993-021A 1993-04-01 Cosmos 2241 1993-022A 1993-04-05 Cosmos 2242 1993-024A 1993-04-15 Cosmos 2243 1993-028A 1993-04-26 Cosmos 2244 1993-029A 1993-04-27 Cosmos 2245 1993-030A 1993-05-10 Cosmos 2246 1993-030B 1993-05-10 Cosmos 2247 1993-030C 1993-05-10 Cosmos 2248 1993-030D 1993-05-10 Cosmos 2249 1993-030E 1993-05-10 Cosmos 2250 1993-030F 1993-05-10 Cosmos 2251 1993-036A 1993-06-15 Cosmos 2252 1993-038A 1993-06-23 Cosmos 2253 1993-038B 1993-06-23 Cosmos 2254 1993-038C 1993-06-23 Cosmos 2255 1993-038D 1993-06-23 Cosmos 2256 1993-038E 1993-06-23 Cosmos 2257 1993-038F
    [Show full text]
  • About the Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation (Ast) and the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (Comstac)
    2000 COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION FORECASTS Federal Aviation Administration’s Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation (AST) and the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) May 2000 ABOUT THE ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR FOR COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION (AST) AND THE COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (COMSTAC) The Federal Aviation Administration’s senior executives from the U.S. commercial Associate Administrator for Commercial Space space transportation and satellite industries, Transportation (AST) licenses and regulates U.S. space-related state government officials, and commercial space launch activity as authorized other space professionals. by Executive Order 12465, Commercial Expendable Launch Vehicle Activities, and the The primary goals of COMSTAC are to: Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984, as amended. AST’s mission is to license and • Evaluate economic, technological and regulate commercial launch operations to ensure institutional issues relating to the U.S. public health and safety and the safety of commercial space transportation industry property, and to protect national security and foreign policy interests of the United States • Provide a forum for the discussion of issues during commercial launch operations. The involving the relationship between industry Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984 and the and government requirements 1996 National Space Policy also direct the Federal Aviation Administration to encourage, • Make recommendations to the Administrator facilitate, and promote commercial launches. on issues and approaches for Federal policies and programs regarding the industry. The Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) provides Additional information concerning AST and information, advice, and recommendations to the COMSTAC can be found on AST’s web site, at Administrator of the Federal Aviation http://ast.faa.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Spacecraft System Failures and Anomalies Attributed to the Natural Space Environment
    NASA Reference Publication 1390 Spacecraft System Failures and Anomalies Attributed to the Natural Space Environment K.L. Bedingfield, R.D. Leach, and M.B. Alexander, Editor Neutral ThermosphereNeutral Thermal Environment Solar EnvironmentSolar ll SSppaacc Plasma rraa ee uu EE tt nn v aa v Ionizing i Ionizing i r Meteoroid/ N N r Radiation o Orbital Debris o Radiation e e n n h h m m T T e e n n t t s s Geomagnetic Field Gravitational Field August 1996 NASA Reference Publication 1390 Spacecraft System Failures and Anomalies Attributed to the Natural Space Environment K.L. Bedingfield Universities Space Research Association • Huntsville, Alabama R.D. Leach Computer Sciences Corporation • Huntsville, Alabama M.B. Alexander, Editor Marshall Space Flight Center • MSFC, Alabama National Aeronautics and Space Administration Marshall Space Flight Center • MSFC, Alabama 35812 August 1996 i PREFACE The effects of the natural space environment on spacecraft design, development, and operation are the topic of a series of NASA Reference Publications currently being developed by the Electromagnetics and Aerospace Environments Branch, Systems Analysis and Integration Laboratory, Marshall Space Flight Center. This primer provides an overview of seven major areas of the natural space environment including brief definitions, related programmatic issues, and effects on various spacecraft subsystems. The primary focus is to present more than 100 case histories of spacecraft failures and anomalies documented from 1974 through 1994 attributed to the natural space environment. A better understanding of the natural space environment and its effects will enable spacecraft designers and managers to more effectively minimize program risks and costs, optimize design quality, and achieve mission objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Lanzamientos De Satélites Notificados En 1993
    This electronic version (PDF) was scanned by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Library & Archives Service from an original paper document in the ITU Library & Archives collections. La présente version électronique (PDF) a été numérisée par le Service de la bibliothèque et des archives de l'Union internationale des télécommunications (UIT) à partir d'un document papier original des collections de ce service. Esta versión electrónica (PDF) ha sido escaneada por el Servicio de Biblioteca y Archivos de la Unión Internacional de Telecomunicaciones (UIT) a partir de un documento impreso original de las colecciones del Servicio de Biblioteca y Archivos de la UIT. (ITU) ﻟﻼﺗﺼﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻻﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﻓﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺤﻔﻮﻇﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﻗﺴﻢ ﺃﺟﺮﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺋﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﺴﺢ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻧﺘﺎﺝ (PDF) ﺍﻹﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺨﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ .ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺤﻔﻮﻇﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻮﻓﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺛﺎﺋﻖ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺃﺻﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺭﻗﻴﺔ ﻭﺛﻴﻘﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻘﻼ ً◌ 此电子版（PDF版本）由国际电信联盟（ITU）图书馆和档案室利用存于该处的纸质文件扫描提供。 Настоящий электронный вариант (PDF) был подготовлен в библиотечно-архивной службе Международного союза электросвязи путем сканирования исходного документа в бумажной форме из библиотечно-архивной службы МСЭ. © International Telecommunication Union sta lista integra todos los satélites artificiales lanzados en 1993. Está basada en la información propor­ E cionada por administraciones de teleco­ municaciones de países Miembros de la UIT, el Comité de investigaciones espaciales (COSPAR), organismos nacionales de investigación espacial, la Oficina de radio­ comunicaciones (BR) de la UIT, y en los datos publicados por la prensa especiali­ zada.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 17 December 1999
    United Nations A/AC.105/734 General Assembly Distr.: General 17 December 1999 Original: English Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space Disposal of satellites in geosynchronous orbit Report by the Secretariat Contents Paragraphs Page I. Introduction ....................................................... 1-2 2 II. Standards and recommendations on geosynchonous satellite disposal ........ 3-8 2 III. Examples of the GSO disposal policy .................................. 9-15 3 A. Intelsat....................................................... 10 3 B. Canadian Space Agency ......................................... 11-12 4 C. Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales................................ 13 4 D. European Space Agency ........................................ 14 4 E. EUMETSAT.................................................. 15 4 IV. Situation near the geostationary orbit................................... 16-20 4 V. Conclusions ....................................................... 21 5 Annex. Statistical data....................................................................... 6 V.99-91115 (E) A/AC.105/734 I. Introduction (b) Every reasonable effort should be made to shorten the lifetime of debris in the transfer orbit; 1. At its forty-second session, the Committee on the (c) A geostationary satellite at the end of its life Peaceful Uses of Outer Space agreed1 that the Scientific should be transferred, before complete exhaustion of its and Technical Subcommittee, at its thirty-seventh session, propellant, to a supersynchronous
    [Show full text]
  • Tutorial Review on Space Manipulators for Space Debris Mitigation
    Review Tutorial Review on Space Manipulators for Space Debris Mitigation Alex Ellery Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; [email protected] Received: 14 February 2019; Accepted: 19 April 2019; Published: 26 April 2019 Abstract: Space-based manipulators have traditionally been tasked with robotic on-orbit servicing or assembly functions, but active debris removal has become a more urgent application. We present a much-needed tutorial review of many of the robotics aspects of active debris removal informed by activities in on-orbit servicing. We begin with a cursory review of on-orbit servicing manipulators followed by a short review on the space debris problem. Following brief consideration of the time delay problems in teleoperation, the meat of the paper explores the field of space robotics regarding the kinematics, dynamics and control of manipulators mounted onto spacecraft. The core of the issue concerns the spacecraft mounting which reacts in response to the motion of the manipulator. We favour the implementation of spacecraft attitude stabilisation to ease some of the computational issues that will become critical as increasing level of autonomy are implemented. We review issues concerned with physical manipulation and the problem of multiple arm operations. We conclude that space robotics is well-developed and sufficiently mature to tackling tasks such as active debris removal. Keywords: space manipulators; space robot; active debris removal; freeflyers; robotic grasping ________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. Introduction Space-based manipulators have traditionally been tasked with robotic on-orbit servicing functions, but despite several decades of development since the 1980s, this has yet to come to pass.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Space Insurance
    Mémoire présenté devant le Centre d’Etudes Actuarielles pour l’obtention du diplôme du Centre d’Etudes Actuarielles et l’admission à l’Institut des Actuaires le : 27 Janvier 2012 Par : Jean-François GAUCHE Titre : SPACE RISKS ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ Confidentialité : NON OUI (Durée : 1an 2 ans) Les signataires s’engagent à respecter la confidentialité indiquée ci-dessus Membre présent du jury de signature Entreprise : l’Institut des Actuaires : Nom : ______________________________ ________________________ Signature : Membres présents du jury du Directeur de mémoire en entreprise : Centre d’Etudes Actuarielles : Thomas BEHAR Nom : ______________________________ Signature : Vincent DAMAS Invité : Gérard CROSET Arnaud COHEN Nom : ______________________________ Signature : Jean-Pierre DIAZ Brigitte DUBUS Paul ESMEIN Autorisation de publication et de Michel FROMENTEAU mise en ligne sur un site de Stéphane MENART diffusion de documents actuariels (après expiration de l’éventuel délai de Christophe IZART confidentialité) Pierre PETAUTON Signature du responsable entreprise Florence PICARD Olivier LOPEZ Secrétariat : Signature du candidat Bibliothèque : 4 rue Chauveau Lagarde 75008 Paris Tél. : 01 44 51 72 72 / Fax : 01 44 51 72 73 MMéémmooiirree AAccttuuaarriiaatt SSppaaccee RRiisskkss Jean-François Gauché Centre d’Etude Décembre 2011 Actuarielle Forewords The present paper is the final work to validate the graduation of actuary studies in the “Centre d’Etude Actuarielle”. The purpose of this work is to analyze the space business environment with an actuary angle in order to find solutions to manage efficiently the underlying space risks. This is an attempt to formalize the business practices with statistics and mathematical models. The main outcome is to calculate the “cost of risk” in the space sector.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iridium 33 – Cosmos 2251 Collision
    THE IRIDIUM 33 – COSMOS 2251 COLLISION Creating Liability Awareness for Space Property Contemplating the Future of Space Surveillance A Research Paper by Michael A. Earl Canadian Satellite Tracking and Orbit Research May 2009 i Copyright Notice All original contents contained within this document are copyright ©2009 Michael A. Earl: Canadian Satellite Tracking and Orbit Research. The reproduction or transmission of any portion of this document, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without prior written consent by the author. Cover Image The cover image was courtesy of the European Space Agency (ESA): Space Debris - Evolution in Pictures: http://esamultimedia.esa.int/images/spacecraft-operations/space_debris/Bee- Hive-1_H1.jpg Acknowledgments A special note of gratitude goes to Ms. Jane E. Yaeger for taking the time to read and edit this paper over the past several weeks. Thanks to Lt. Col (Retd.) Philip W. Somers who introduced me to the exciting and multi-faceted world of satellite tracking. A special thanks to everyone diligently working in the Space Surveillance Network, the 1st Space Command Squadron, the Joint Space Operations Center, North American Air Defense and all others doing their best to keep the satellite population safe. i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................1 THE IRIDIUM 33 – COSMOS 2251 COLLISION ..................................................................2 DEFINING AND REDEFINING TERMS................................................................................5
    [Show full text]